Periodic Mesoporous Organosilicas with Helical and Concentric Circular Pore Architectures

This study systematically investigates periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PMOs) with controlled helical and concentric circular (CC) pore architectures prepared through a basic‐catalyzed sol–gel process by using an achiral cationic surfactant trimethyloctadecylammonium bromide (C₁₈TAB) as a structure‐directing agent, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) as an additive, and 1,2‐bis(triethoxysilyl)ethane (BTEE) as a hybrid silica precursor. By increasing the weight ratio of PFOA/C₁₈TAB, a pore architecture transition of PMO materials from hexagonal‐arrayed, straight longitudinal channels to helical and CC mesostructures is achieved; such a transition has not been observed before in PMO materials. Our discovery is helpful in understanding the supramolecular cooperative assembly of hybrid materials and their structural and morphological evolution, which are important in the future applications of PMO materials.     

Self‐Assembly and Gelation of Poly(aryl ether) Dendrons Containing Hydrazide Units: Factors Controlling the Formation of Helical Structures

Self‐assembly of AB₂ and AB₃ type low molecular weight poly(aryl ether) dendrons that contain hydrazide units were used to investigate mechanistic aspects of helical structure formation during self‐assembly. The results suggest that there are three important aspects that control helical structure formation in such systems with acyl hydrazide/hydrazone linkage: i) J‐type aggregation, ii) the hydrogen‐bond donor/acceptor ability of the solvent, and iii) the dielectric constant of the solvent. The monomer units self‐assemble to form dimer structures through hydrogen‐bonding and further assembly of the hydrogen‐bonded dimers leads to macroscopic chirality in the present case. Dimer formation was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and by mass spectrometry. The self‐assembly in the system was driven by hydrogen‐bonding and π–π stacking interactions. The morphology of the aggregates formed was examined by scanning electron microscopy, and the analysis suggests that aprotic solvent systems facilitate helical fibre formation, whereas introduction of protic solvents results in the formation of flat ribbons. This detailed mechanistic study suggests that the self‐assembly follows a nucleation–elongation model to form helical structures, rather than the isodesmic model.     

Controlled Stability of the Triple‐Stranded Helical Structure of a β‐1,3‐Glucan with a Chromophoric Aromatic Moiety at a Peripheral Position

We synthesized a semiartificial β‐1,3‐glucan, curdlan with dialkylaniline groups (CUR‐DA), that bears chromophoric aromatic groups at its peripheral positions. Spectroscopic studies as well as microscopic observations indicate that CUR‐DA adopts a triple‐stranded helical structure in water‐ or methanol‐rich solutions of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). This triple‐stranded helical structure exhibits high thermal stability and resistance to base, attributes that are similar to those of the triple‐stranded helical structure of native β‐1,3‐glucans such as schizophyllan. Moreover, we found that the stability of the triple‐stranded helical structure can be easily modulated by solvent composition and metal‐ion (Zn²⁺) binding. As β‐1,3‐glucan polysaccharides are known to serve as “polymeric” hosts, including certain DNA molecules, carbon nanotubes, and conjugated polymers, and complexation occurs only with the single‐stranded structure, this information is very useful for the creation of these attractive polymeric composites, the controlled release of DNA, and so on.     

Redox‐Controlled Helical Self‐Assembly of a Polyoxometalate Complex

Polyoxometalate (POM) complex (DODA)₂[Mo₆O₁₉] with a symmetrical linear structure was prepared conveniently by replacing the tetrabutylammonium (TBA) counterions of Lindquist‐type cluster (TBA)₂[Mo₆O₁₉] with cationic surfactant dioctadecyldimethylammonium (DODA). A helical self‐assembled structure of the complex was formed in dichloromethane/propanol. The dynamically reversible transformation between helical and spherical assemblies on alternate UV irradiation and H₂O₂ oxidation was characterized by SEM, TEM, and UV/Vis studies. The redox‐controlled morphology change is modulated by variation of the electrostatic interactions between the inorganic polyanion and the organic cation DODA through controlling the redox properties of the POM component, as shown by the XRD, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopic, and ¹H NMR measurements. The strategy applied herein is a unique example of targeted smart and helical assembly of POM complexes.     

Helical stacking tuned by alkoxy side chains in pi-conjugated triphenylbenzene discotic derivatives

We report on the synthesis and self-assembly of a new series of discotic molecules containing triphenylbenzene as the core and alkoxy side chain with varying length. It was found that compounds 3 a-c, 4 b and 5 b could form stable gels in several apolar solvents. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images revealed that their morphologies were very different for the different alkoxy-substituted organogels. In toluene or hexane, 3 b and 3 c resulted in both left- and right-handed helical fibers, whereas 3 a resulted in straight rigid fibers; 4 b and 5 b resulted in most straight fibers with a few twisted fibers. The results from FT-IR and UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy indicated that the hydrogen bonding and pi-pi interactions were the main driving forces for the formation of the self-assembled gels. Further detailed analysis of their aggregation modes were conducted by UV-visible absorption spectra and X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements. Based on these findings, the influence of these peripheral alkoxy substituents on the gel formation and the aggregation mode were discussed. The special enhanced fluorescent emissions, which resulted from aggregation, were also found in the gel phase.     

Self‐Assembly of α‐Helical Polypeptides Driven by Complex Coacervation

Reported is the ability of α‐helical polypeptides to self‐assemble with oppositely‐charged polypeptides to form liquid complexes while maintaining their α‐helical secondary structure. Coupling the α‐helical polypeptide to a neutral, hydrophilic polymer and subsequent complexation enables the formation of nanoscale coacervate‐core micelles. While previous reports on polypeptide complexation demonstrated a critical dependence of the nature of the complex (liquid versus solid) on chirality, the α‐helical structure of the positively charged polypeptide prevents the formation of β‐sheets, which would otherwise drive the assembly into a solid state, thereby, enabling coacervate formation between two chiral components. The higher charge density of the assembly, a result of the folding of the α‐helical polypeptide, provides enhanced resistance to salts known to inhibit polypeptide complexation. The unique combination of properties of these materials can enhance the known potential of fluid polypeptide complexes for delivery of biologically relevant molecules.     

Helical Arrangement of Porphyrins along DNA: Towards Photoactive DNA‐Based Nanoarchitectures

Stack them helically : A self‐assembled helically stacked array of up to 11 porphyrin (Po)‐modified uridines (red and blue in the double strand shown) is based on the supramolecular scaffold of duplex DNA and shows promising optical properties. Such architectures could find application as functional molecules for photoactive nanomaterials and photonic nanostructures.

     

Helical complexes containing diamide-bridged benzene-o-dithiolato/catecholato ligands

The benzene-o-dithiol/catechol ligands H4-2 and H4-3 react with [TiO(acac)2] to give the dinuclear, double-stranded anionic complexes [Ti2(L)2(mu-OCH3)2](2-) ([22](2-), L=2(4-); [23](2-), L=3(4-)). NMR spectroscopic investigations reveal that the complex anion [Ti2(2)2(mu-OCH3)(2)](2-) is formed as a mixture of three of four possible isomers/pairs of enantiomers, whereas only one isomer of the complex anion [Ti2(3)2(mu-OCH3)(2)](2-) is obtained. The crystal structure analysis of (PNP)2[Ti2(3)2(mu-OCH3)2] shows a parallel orientation of the ligand strands, whereas the structure determination for (AsPh4)2[Ti2(2)2(mu-OCH3)2] does not yield conclusive results about the orientation of the ligand strands due the presence of different isomers in solution, the possible co-crystallisation of different isomers and severe disorder in the crystal. NMR spectroscopy shows that ligand H4-3 reacts at elevated temperature with [TiO(acac)2] to give the triple-stranded helicate (PNP)4[Ti2(3)3] ((PNP)4[24]) as a mixture of two isomers, one with a parallel orientation of the ligand strands and one with an antiparallel orientation. Exclusively the triple-stranded helicates [Ti2(L)(3)](4-) ([25](4-), L=1(4-); [26](2-), L=4(4-)) are formed in the reaction of ligands H4-1 and H4-4 with [TiO(acac)2]. The molecular structures of Na(PNP)3[Ti2(1)3]CH(3)OHH(2)OEt(2)O (Na(PNP)3[25]CH(3)OHH(2)OEt(2)O) and Na(1.5)(PNP)(6.5)[Ti2(4)3]2.3 DMF (Na(1.5)(PNP)(6.5)[26]2.3 DMF) reveal a parallel orientation of the ligand strands in both complexes, which is retained in solution. The sodium cations present in the crystal structures lead to two different kinds of aggregation in the solid state. Na-[25]-Na-[25]-Na polymeric chains are formed from compound Na(PNP)3[25], with the sodium cations coordinated by the carbonyl groups of two ligand strands from two different [Ti2(1)3](4-) ions in addition to solvent molecules. In contrast to this, two [Ti2(4)3](4-) ions are connected by a sodium cation that is coordinated by the three meta oxygen atoms of the catecholato groups of each complex tetraanion to form a central {NaO6} octahedron in the anionic pentanuclear complex {[26]-Na-[26]}(7-).     

The Formation of Organogels and Helical Nanofibers from Simple Organic Salts

Simple organic salts based on aniline‐derived cations and D ‐tartrate anions formed organogels and helical nanofibers. The organic salt (p‐fluoroanilinium)(D ‐tartrate) was found to generate an organogel despite the absence of a hydrophobic alkyl chain, whereas (p‐iodoanilinium)(D ‐tartrate) formed helical nanofibers in braided ropelike structures through a rolling‐up process. The helicity of these nanofibers could be reversed by changing the growth solvent. The driving forces responsible for the formation of the nanofibers were determined to be 1D O?H???O^? hydrogen‐bonding interactions between D ‐tartrate anions and π stacking of anilinium cations, as well as steric hindrance between the hydrogen‐bonded chains.     

Twisted Morphologies and Novel Chiral Macroporous Films from the Self‐Assembly of Optically Active Helical Polyphosphazene Block Copolymers

A series of optically active helical polyphosphazene block copolymers of general formula R? [N?P(O₂C₂₀H₁₂)]_n‐b‐[N?PMePh]_m (R‐ 7 a – c ) was synthesized and characterized. The polymers were prepared by sequential living cationic polycondensation of N‐silylphosphoranimines using the mono‐end‐capped initiator [Ph₃P?N?PCl₃][PCl₆] ( 5 ) and exhibit a low polydispersity index (ca. 1.3). The temperature dependence of the specific optical activity ([α]_D) of R‐ 7 a , b relative to that for the homopolymers R‐[N?P(O₂C₂₀H₁₂)]_n (R‐ 8 a ) and the R/S analogues (R/S‐ 7 a , b ), revealed that the binaphthoxy–phosphazene segments induce a preferential helical conformation in the [N?PMePh] blocks through a “sergeant‐and‐soldiers” mechanism, an effect that is unprecedented in polyphosphazenes. The self‐assembly of drop‐cast thin films of the chiral block copolymer R‐ 7 b (bearing a long chiral and rigid R? [N?P(O₂C₂₀H₁₂)] segment) evidenced a transfer of helicity mechanism, leading to the formation of twisted morphologies (twisted “pearl necklace”), not observed in the nonchiral R/S‐ 7 b . The chiral R‐ 7 a and the nonchiral R/S‐ 7 a , self‐assemble by a nondirected morphology reconstruction process into regular‐shaped macroporous films with chiral‐rich areas close to edge of the pore. This is the first nontemplate self‐assembly route to chiral macroporous polymeric films with pore size larger than 50 nm. The solvent annealing (THF) of these films leads to the formation of regular spherical nanostructures (ca. 50 nm), a rare example of nanospheres exclusively formed by synthetic helical polymers.     

Selective Synthesis of Single‐ and Multi‐Walled Supramolecular Nanotubes by Using Solvophobic/Solvophilic Controls: Stepwise Radial Growth via “Coil‐on‐Tube” Intermediates

Novel hexa‐peri‐hexabenzocoronene (HBC) derivatives, ^FHBC and ^FHBC*, which carry perfluoroalkyl segments on one side of the HBC core and long alkyl tails on the other, were synthesized. Their perfluoroalkyl segments are highly solvated in C₆F₆ (solvophilic effect) and do not assemble, whereas in CH₂Cl₂, they are excluded (solvophobic effect) and assemble together consequently. For example, the use of C₆F₆ and CH₂Cl₂ as assembling media for ^FHBC leads to the selective formation of single‐ and multi‐walled nanotubes, respectively. When a higher monomer concentration is applied in CH₂Cl₂, multi‐walled nanotubes with a larger number of walls result. ^FHBC in CH₂Cl₂ self‐assembles rather slowly, thereby allowing for the observation of coil‐on‐tube structures, which are possible intermediates for the stepwise radial growth of the nanotubular wall. Casting of the multi‐walled nanotubes onto a quartz plate yields a superhydrophobic thin film with a water contact angle of 161±2°.     

Heterometallic Complexes with Gold(I) Metalloligands: Self‐Assembly of Helical Dimers Stabilized by Weak Intermolecular Interactions and Solvophobic Effects

New gold(I) alkynyl metalloligands bpylC?CAuL, bpyl′C?CAuPPh₃, and PPN[Au(C?Cbpyl′)₂] (bpyl or bpyl′=2,2′‐bipyridin‐5‐yl or ?4‐yl, respectively; L=PMe_xPh_3?x (x=1–3), P(C₆H₃Me₂‐3,5)₃, PCy₃, XyNC) have been synthesized. Ligands bpylC?CH and metalloligands bpylC?CAuL (L=PPh₃, PMePh₂, PCy₃, CNXy) react with MX₂ (M=Fe, Zn, X=ClO₄; M=Co, X=BF₄) to give complexes [M(bpylC?CZ)₃]X₂ (Z=H or AuL). In most cases, these complexes are mixtures of fac and mer isomers in a statistical distribution, in both CH₂Cl₂ and MeCN. However, for L=PPh₃, the fac isomer is dominant in MeCN. NMR and ESI‐MS studies, together with the crystal structure of [Co(bpylC?CAuPPh₃)₃](BF₄)₂, suggest that this solvent dependence is originated by the formation of helical dimers between two fac complexes in MeCN. These dimers are stabilized by solvophobic effects and multiple intermolecular interactions. Complex [Fe(Ph₃PAuC?CbpdiylC?CAuPPh₃)₃](ClO₄)₂ (bpdiyl=2,2′‐bipyridin‐5,5′‐diyl) was obtained by reaction of three diauro diethynylbipyridines and Fe(ClO₄)₂.     

Evolution from lyotropic liquid crystal to helical fibrous organogel of an achiral fluorescent twin-tapered bi-1,3,4-oxadiazole derivative

We report an unprecedented hierarchical self‐assembly of an achiral twin‐tapered bi‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole derivative (2,2‐bis(3,4,5‐trioctanoxyphenyl)‐bi‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole, BOXD‐T8). This molecule can form a layer‐structured lyotropic liquid crystal and further forms a helical fibrous organogel in DMF at concentrations above 0.6 wt %. The self‐assembly process of BOXD‐T8 in DMF is accompanied by a change in its fluorescence. The pitches of the helical fibers are non‐uniform, and both left‐ and right‐handed helical fibers are observed in equal quantities. Intermolecular π–π interactions between aromatic segments have been demonstrated to be the driving force for aggregate formation. This helical structure of BOXD‐T8 is dependent on the solvent, concentration, and the layer‐structured intermediate liquid‐crystalline state.     

Evolution of a Constitutional Dynamic Library Driven by Self‐Organisation of a Helically Folded Molecular Strand

Conversion of macrocyclic imine entities into helical strands was achieved through three‐ and four‐component exchange reactions within constitutionally dynamic libraries. The generation of sequences of the intrinsic helicity codon, based on the hydrazone–pyrimidine fragment obtained by condensation of pyrimidine dialdehyde A with pyrimidine bis‐hydrazine B , shifted the equilibrium between all the possible macrocycles and strands towards the full expression (>98%) of helical product [ A / B ]. Furthermore, it was shown that chain folding accelerated the dynamic exchange reactions among the library members. Lastly, in four‐component experiments (involving A , B , E and either C or D ), even though the macrocyclic entities ([ A / C ], [ B / E ]; [ A / D ], [ B / E ]) were the kinetically preferred products, over time dialdehyde A relinquished its initial diamine partners C or D to opt for bis‐hydrazine B , which allowed the preferential formation of the helically folded strand. The present results indicate that self‐organisation pressure was able to drive the dynamic system towards the selective generation of the strand undergoing helical folding.