蕴含权重的偏序集多准则决策法

针对偏序集方法不能解决含有权重的多准则决策问题,提出一种“隐式”赋权的偏序决策方法。首先将含有m个方案和n个准则的决策问题表示成偏序集,之后按权重由大到小的顺序,对准则进行逐步相加形成n个新的准则,得到一个新的偏序集。根据偏序集间的包含关系,证明了新偏序集不仅蕴含了权重信息,而且比初始偏序集有更强的排序能力。结果表明,该法在应用中仅需获取权重排序信息,无需精确权重,适用于权重难以确定的多准则决策问题。以三峡库区水质评价为例,例子表明新方法明显优于原有的偏序决策方法,能够对13个方案进行聚类和排序,而原有方法在该例中几乎难以应用。     

基于共识性测度的概率语言多准则群决策方法研究

针对准则值为概率语言术语集的决策问题,提出一种基于共识性测度的概率语言多准则群决策方法.首先,方法定义概率语言共识性测度公式,据此判断个体决策信息是否满足共识性检验.其次,建立考虑决策者协作意愿的群体共识反馈调整模型及权重惩罚体系.此外,利用网络层次分析法(ANP)和共识性测度公式构建指标定权模型,模型可有效解决指标间互相影响导致的权重计算失准问题.随后,提出改进的TODIM决策方法,结合准则权系数及通过共识性检验的群决策矩阵,对方案进行择优排序.最后,通过算例分析验证了该方法的有效性.     

基于概率语言BWM与PROMETHEEII的多准则决策方法

提出了一种改进的偏好顺序结构评估法(Preference Ranking Organization Method For Enrichment Evaluations, PROMETHEE),即基于概率语言BWM与PROMETHEE II的多准则决策方法。针对多准则决策过程中,评价信息的模糊性和不确定性,采用概率语言(Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set, PLTS)处理评价信息,并纳入PROMETHEE II中对备选方案进行排序。针对传统的PROMETHEE II 中准则权重需要从外部获得的问题,采用最优最劣法(Best-worst Method, BWM)确定准则的权重。最后,以某企业无人机改造方案为例进行分析,验证所提方法的有效性和可行性。     

基于相对熵的多粒度语言信息的多属性群决策方法

针对具有多粒度语言评价信息的多属性群决策问题,提出了一种基于二元语义信息处理和相对熵的群决策方法。该方法首先给出了多粒度语言评价信息一致化为由基本语言评价集表示的相同粒度二元语义信息的方法,然后对于属性权重信息不完全的情形,建立了基于相对熵的多目标规划模型获得相应的属性权重,并利用二元语义的集结算子对语言评价信息进行加权集成,从而获得各个决策方案的排序和择优结果;最后给出一个实例分析,说明了该方法的有效性和可行性。     

基于集对分析的混合型多属性决策方法的研究

针对属性权重信息不完全且属性值为实数、区间数和模糊语言值相结合的混合型多属性决策问题,提出了一种基于集对分析的多属性决策方法.该方法所需计算量较少,方法简单,易于计算.最后通过实例验证了该方法的有效性和实用性.     

基于模糊证据推理及改进TOPSIS的多属性群决策方法

针对不同识别框架多属性群决策问题属性准则度量的不确定性、随机性,定义基于梯形模糊数表征的属性准则评价等级相似度量,求解专家决策权重的最优解。对公共识别框架备选方案属性准则采用模糊证据推理过程综合专家评价等级置信度信息;利用可严格区分属性准则评价等级的相似度量,改进TOPSIS方法中备选方案属性准则评价等级置信度距离因子,获取备选方案逼近正负理想解的贴近度。实例分析以某通信企业电信产品市场竞争力评估为例,说明基于模糊证据推理、改进TOPSIS的多属性群决策问题求解过程,从属性准则专家模糊评价等级置信度集中获取直观的待评估产品市场竞争力排序结果,验证该方法解决此类决策问题的可行性与有效性。     

基于VIKOR和关联系数的犹豫三角模糊语言多属性决策方法

针对属性评价值为犹豫三角模糊语言集的多属性决策问题,提出一种基于VIKOR方法的犹豫三角模糊语言多属性决策方法.首先定义了犹豫三角模糊语言集的相关概念.然后运用VIKOR和关联系数方法,在可接受优势和决策过程稳定的条件下对方案进行择优,在理论分析的基础上,提出了这种新方法的计算步骤.并构建了确定最优属性权重的非线性规划模型,研究了当专家权重和属性权重未知情况下的犹豫三角模糊语言多属性决策方法.最后通过实例说明了该方法的有效性和可行性.     

基于多属性群决策的软件可靠性模型选择方案

基于模型评价准则的属性值和专家经验的偏好信息进行软件可靠性增长模型的选择,可归结为多属性群决策问题.模型评价准则的主观专家偏好可利用层次分析方法将其量化得到其主观排序权重;基于失效数据的模型评价准则的计算数据可利用熵权法获得客观排序权重.综合两种权重可得到既能反映专家经验又能综合实际软件可靠性测试数据的模型评价方案.实例分析表明该方案具有合理性和可行性.     

熵权DEA混合多目标评价方法研究

提高多目标决策问题评价结果的客观性、准确性,一直是决策科学研究的重要课题.结合熵权、DEA等数学方法对多目标决策问题进行研究,构造混合评价方法.首先通过构造熵权模型,获取主观权重;其次DEA的方法对多目标决策问题进行综合评价,得到问题的综合评价值,最后根据评价结果进行问题分析和判断.算例结果表明,方法能够应用于多目标决策问题,评价结果客观、准确.     

基于语言值软集的多准则群决策方法及其应用

在语言值评估集上引进适当的运算,建立语言值逻辑代数系统,并利用虚拟术语指标不丢失信息的特点,扩展语言值逻辑代数系统为连续语言值逻辑代数系统。通过加权平均算子将全部专家对各决策方案的语言值评估信息集结,得到专家群对全部决策方案就全部准则的集中评估,全部集中评估值构成决策方案上的语言值软集。建立优化模型计算最优准则权重,利用最优准则权重将专家关于各准则的语言值评估结果进行集结,得到各专家对全部决策方案的评估值,评估值全体可看成专家群上的语言值软集,这里参数集为决策方案集。建立基于决策方案上的语言值软集的粗糙近似模型——语言值粗糙近似模型,通过计算各专家对全部决策方案的评估值关于语言值粗糙近似模型的下近似和上近似,得到专家群上的语言值下近似软集和上近似软集。通过对全部决策方案评估集及其语言值粗糙下近似、上近似进行加权算术平均,分别得到三个决策方案上的语言值模糊集。通过三个语言值模糊集对全部决策方案排序。最后,应用基于语言值软集的多准则群决策方法对电子商务监管系统安全进行多准则综合决策评估,说明本文提出的多准则群决策方法是有效的和合理的。     

基于改进熵权法的区间直觉模糊TOPSIS方法

本文对区间直觉模糊信息的TOPSIS多属性决策方法进行了研究。在属性权重信息完全未知的情况下,通过研究熵权法以及区间直觉模糊集本身的一些性质特点,将熵权法拓展到区间直觉模糊环境中来确定属性权重,进而提供了一种可直接利用评估信息的新的TOPSIS决策方法。该方法不仅拓展了传统熵权法的应用范围,而且不需要决策者事先给出权重信息,结果更加客观和可靠。应用实例表明该方法的可行性和有效性,具有推广应用价值。     

Using TODIM to evaluate green supply chain practices under uncertainty

This study approaches the problem of exploring the importance and performance levels in green supply chain practices (GSCP) under conditions of uncertainty. This contribution creates a mechanism that assists in the process of analyzing and selecting the alternatives aligned with the proposed criteria on both the qualitative and quantitative scales. This analysis uses the acronym from the interactive and multi-criteria decision-making method (known as TODIM in Portuguese), a discrete multi-criteria method based on prospect theory. However, the criteria weights and alternatives are described as linguistic preferences and involve quantitative data. The qualitative preferences transformed into crisp values and the quantitative data converts into comparable scale. The results indicate the discrepancies between the importance and performance levels of the GSCP. This study identified set of principal criteria that can influence the recommendations for strategic direction in the most systematic and wide-ranging manner.     

Genetic algorithm-based multi-criteria project portfolio selection

Project portfolio selection is one of the most important decision-making problems for most organizations in project management and engineering management. Usually project portfolio decisions are very complicated when project interactions in terms of multiple selection criteria and preference information of decision makers (DMs) in terms of the criteria importance are taken into consideration simultaneously. In order to solve this complex decision-making problem, a multi-criteria project portfolio selection problem considering project interactions in terms of multiple selection criteria and DMs?? preferences is first formulated. Then a genetic algorithm (GA)-based nonlinear integer programming (NIP) approach is used to solve the multi-criteria project portfolio selection problem. Finally, two illustrative examples are presented for demonstration and verification purposes. Experimental results obtained indicate that the GA-based NIP approach can be used as a feasible and effective solution to multi-criteria project portfolio selection problems.     

Multiple criteria group decision-making with generalized interval-valued fuzzy numbers based on signed distances and incomplete weights

Decision-making information provided by decision makers is often imprecise or uncertain, due to lack of data, time pressure, or the decision makers’ limited attention and information-processing capabilities. Interval-valued fuzzy sets are associated with greater imprecision and more ambiguity than are ordinary fuzzy sets. For these reasons, this paper presents a signed distance-based method for handling fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making problems in which individual assessments are provided as generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, and the information about criterion weights are not precisely but partially known. First, concerning the relative importance of decision makers and the group consensus of fuzzy opinions, all individual decision opinions were aggregated into group opinions using a hybrid average with weighted averaging and signed distance-based ordered weighted averaging operations. Next, considering a decision situation with incomplete weight information of criteria, an integrated programming model was developed to estimate criterion weights and to order the priorities of various alternatives based on signed distances. In addition, several deviation variables were introduced to mitigate the effect of inconsistent evaluations on the importance of criteria. Finally, the feasibility of the proposed method is illustrated by a numerical example of a multi-criteria supplier selection problem. Furthermore, a comparative analysis with other methods was conducted to validate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed methodology.     

属性和专家客观权重未知的多值中智数群决策方法

针对评价信息为多值中智数的多属性决策问题,提出基于最小最大相似度求解属性权重与标准区间求解专家权重的方法.该方法首先根据最小最大模型求解属性权重,将初始评价矩阵集结为综合决策矩阵,其次利用数字分析法求得标准区间,根据各专家与标准区间的相似度确定专家权重,再对综合评价矩阵集结得各方案的综合评价值,对综合评价值排序得最优方...     

基于直觉模糊集的多准则模糊决策问题

提出了一种基于直觉模糊集处理模糊决策问题的新方法.该方法用直觉模糊集描述方案关于准则集的满足程度与不满足程度.而且该方法允许决策者给出准则对于模糊集“重要”的隶属度与非隶属度,即准则的权重也由直觉模糊集表示.这种方法为决策者做出最优决策提供了一种方便有效的方法.     

Pseudo-criteria versus linear utility function in stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis

Stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA) is a multi-criteria decision support method for multiple decision-makers (DMs) in discrete problems. SMAA does not require explicit or implicit preference information from the DMs. Instead, the method is based on exploring the weight space in order to describe the valuations that would make each alternative the preferred one. Partial preference information can be represented in the weight space analysis through weight distributions. In this paper we compare two variants of the SMAA method using randomly generated test problems with 2–12 criteria and 4–12 alternatives. In the original SMAA, a utility or value function models the DMs' preference structure, and the inaccuracy or uncertainty of the criteria is represented by probability distributions. In SMAA-3, ELECTRE III-type pseudo-criteria are used instead. Both methods compute for each alternative an acceptability index measuring the variety of different valuations that supports this alternative, and a central weight vector representing the typical valuations resulting in this decision. We seek answers to three questions: (1) how similar are the results provided by the decision models, (2) what kind of systematic differences exists between the models, and (3) how could one select indifference and preference thresholds of the pseudo-criteria model to match a utility model with given probability distributions?     

基于四参数区间数的多准则决策方法

针对准则权重和准则值均为四参数区间数的多准则决策问题,提出了一种基于四参数区间集结算子的多准则决策方法。首先,定义了四参数区间数以及加权的连续四参数区间数有序加权平均 (WCFP-OWA) 算子和加权的连续四参数区间数有序加权几何平均 (WCFP-OWG) 算子,并利用连续四参数区间数有序加权平均 (CFP-OWA) 算子对四参数区间数准则权重进行处理,然后利用WCFP-OWA算子和WCFP-OWG算子对四参数区间数准则值进行集成得到综合值以确定方案排序。最后将该方法应用于勘探公司的选择,验证了该方法的合理性和有效性。     

Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method using entropy weights-based correlation coefficients of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets

A multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on weighted correlation coefficients using entropy weights is proposed under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment for the some situations where the information about criteria weights for alternatives is completely unknown. To determine the entropy weights with respect to a decision matrix provided as interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs), we propose two entropy measures for IVIFSs and establish an entropy weight model, which can be used to determine the criteria weights on alternatives, and then propose an evaluation formula of weighted correlation coefficient between an alternative and the ideal alternative. The alternatives can be ranked and the most desirable one(s) can be selected according to the values of the weighted correlation coefficients. Finally, two applied examples demonstrate the applicability and benefit of the proposed method: it is capable for handling the multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems with completely unknown weights for criteria.     

基于Vague集的最优路径选择方法（英文）

Optimal route selection is an important function of vehicle traffic flow guidance system. Its core is to determine the index weight for measuring the route merits and to determine the evaluation method for selecting route. In this paper, subjective weighting method which relies on driver preference is used to determine the weight and the paper proposes the multi-criteria weighted decision method based on vague sets for selecting the optimal route. Examples show that, the usage of vague sets to describe route index value can provide more decision-making information for route selection.