Eliminating the chlorite interference in US Environmental Protection Agency Method 317.0 permits analysis of trace bromate levels in all drinking water matrices

A post-column reagent (PCR) method for bromate analysis in drinking water with a method detection limit (MDL) and method reporting limit (MRL) of 0.1 and 0.5 microg/l, respectively, has been developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for future publication as EPA Method 317.0. The PCR method provides comparable results to the EPA's Selective Anion Concentration (SAC) method used to support the laboratory analysis of Information Collection Rule (ICR) low-level bromate samples and offers a simple, rugged, direct injection method with potential to be utilized as a compliance monitoring technique for all inorganic Disinfectants/Disinfection By-Products (D/DBPs). It has superior sensitivity for bromate compared to EPA Method 300.1, which was promulgated as the compliance monitoring method for bromate under Stage 1 of the D/DBP rule. This paper addresses elimination of the chlorite interference that was previously reported in finished waters from public water systems (PWSs) that employ chlorine dioxide as the disinfectant. An evaluation of Method 317.0 for the analysis of bromate in commercial bottled waters is also reported.     

Challenges encountered in extending the sensitivity of US Environmental Protection Agency Method 314.0 for perchlorate in drinking water

Concerns about the potential adverse health effects of perchlorate at concentrations below the minimum reporting level (MRL) of US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 314.0 (generally recognized as 4.0 microg/l) have led to an interest in increasing the sensitivity of the method. This work describes the use of 2 mm columns with a large-loop direct injection method, a column concentration technique and this concentration technique with a background reduction step, to increase the sensitivity for the analysis of trace levels of perchlorate in high ionic strength matrices. The concentrator columns studied were the Dionex TAC LP-1 and a new Dionex high capacity Cryptand concentrator column. The use of a surrogate to monitor trapping efficiency for the concentration technique and the use of confirmational columns to minimize the potential for false positives are also discussed. The large-loop direct injection method and the column concentration methods provided acceptable data when the samples were pre-treated with solid phase pretreatment cartridges. The background reduction technique did not provide acceptable data with either of the concentrator columns evaluated.     

US Environmental Protection Agency Method 314.1, an automated sample preconcentration/matrix elimination suppressed conductivity method for the analysis of trace levels (0.50 microg/L) of perchlorate in drinking water

Since 1997 there has been increasing interest in the development of analytical methods for the analysis of perchlorate. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 314.0, which was used during the first Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation (UCMR) cycle, supports a method reporting limit (MRL) of 4.0 microg/L. The non-selective nature of conductivity detection, combined with very high ionic strength matrices, can create conditions that make the determination of perchlorate difficult. The objective of this work was to develop an automated, suppressed conductivity method with improved sensitivity for use in the second UCMR cycle. The new method, EPA Method 314.1, uses a 35 mm x 4 mm cryptand concentrator column in the sample loop position to concentrate perchlorate from a 2 mL sample volume, which is subsequently rinsed with 10 mM NaOH to remove interfering anions. The cryptand concentrator column is combined with a primary AS16 analytical column and a confirmation AS20 analytical column. Unique characteristics of the cryptand column allow perchlorate to be desorbed from the cryptand trap and refocused on the head of the guard column for subsequent separation and analysis. EPA Method 314.1 has a perchlorate lowest concentration minimum reporting level (LCMRL) of 0.13 microg/L in both drinking water and laboratory synthetic sample matrices (LSSM) containing up to 1,000 microg/L each of chloride, bicarbonate and sulfate.     

Determination of volatile compounds in wine by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection: comparison between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 3sigma approach and Hubaux-Vos calculation of detection limits using ordinary and bivariate least squares

A capillary GC-flame ionization detection (FID) method to determine volatile compounds (ethyl acetate, 1,1-diethoxyethane, methyl alcohol, 1-propanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 1-butanol, and 2-butanol) in wine was investigated in terms of calculation of detection limits and calibration method. The main objectives were: (1) calculation of regression coefficient parameters by ordinary least-squares (OLS) and bivariate least-squares (BLS) regression models, taking into account errors in both axes; (2) estimation of linear dynamic range (LDR) according to International Conference on Harmonization recommendations; (3) performance evaluation of a method by using three different internal standards (ISs) such as acetonitrile, acetone, and 1-pentanol; (4) evaluation of LODs according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 3sigma approach and the Hubaux-Vos (H-V) method; (5) application of H-V theory to a gas chromatographic analytical method and to a food matrix; and (6) accuracy assessment of the method relative to methyl alcohol content through a Unione Italiana Vini (UIV) interlaboratory proficiency test. Calibration curves calculated via BLS and OLS show similar slopes, while intercepts are closer to zero in the first case, independent of the chosen IS. The studied ISs show a substantially equivalent behavior, even though the IS closer to the analyte retention time seems to be more appropriate in terms of LDR and LOD. Results indicate an underestimation of LODs using the EPA 3sigma approach instead of the more realistic H-V method, both with OLS and BLS regression models. Methanol contents compared with UIV average values indicate recovery between 90 and 110%.     

US Environmental Protection Agency Method 326.0, a new method for monitoring inorganic oxyhalides and optimization of the postcolumn derivatization for the selective determination of trace levels of bromate

The development of US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 317.0 provided a more sensitive, acceptable alternative to EPA Method 300.1 to be proposed as one of the recommended compliance monitoring methods for Stage II of the Disinfectants/Disinfection By-Products (DBP) Rule. This work was initiated to evaluate other postcolumn reagents (PCRs) that might be utilized to provide an additional, alternative method in order to augment compliance monitoring flexibility for inorganic oxyhalide DBP anions. Modifications of the method reported by Salhi and von Gunten, which included adjustment and optimization of flow-rates, reaction temperature, and delivery of the PCR, improved the method performance. Method 326.0 incorporates an acidic solution of potassium iodide containing catalytic amounts of molybdenum(VI) as the PCR and provides acceptable precision and accuracy for all analytes and a postcolumn bromate detection limit in reagent water of 0.17 microg/l.     

Universal screening method for the determination of US Environmental Protection Agency phenols at the lower ng l(-1) level in water samples by on-line solid-phase extraction-high-performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry within a single run

The applicability of a previously optimized method for the analysis of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations phenols, based on on-line solid-phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric (MS) detection in different matrix loaded water samples is demonstrated. The comprehensive optimization of the mobile phase conditions and their influence on the ionization process in atmospheric pressure ionization is described in detail. In particular, MS detection of the weakly acidic phenols such as phenol, monochlorinated phenols and methylated phenols requires the absence of acidic mobile phase modifiers and buffers. Thus lower retention times and slight peak broadening of the more acidic dinitrophenols are obtained if the entire range of EPA phenols is analyzed within a single chromatographic run. The figures of merit for the method were determined and the applicability to real water samples was investigated. Limits of detection for phenols ranging from 40 to 280 ng l(-1) and relative standard deviations below 8% in SCAN mode are obtained for all phenols if only 10-ml river water samples with low dissolved organic carbon (DOC 5 mg C l(-1) concentrations are preconcentrated. The method was used to detect 2-nitrophenol and 4-nitrophenol in river water samples in the lower ng l(-1) range. The analysis of highly matrix-loaded samples (DOC 210 mg C l(-1)) requires a reduced enrichment volume resulting in decreased sensitivity. Still the method is capable of reaching excellent detection limits which demonstrates its excellent suitability for screening analysis.