The Unexpected Mechanism Underlying the High‐Valent Mono‐Oxo‐Rhenium(V) Hydride Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of CN Functionalities: Insights from a DFT Study

In this study, we theoretically investigated the mechanism underlying the high‐valent mono‐oxo‐rhenium(V) hydride Re(O)HCl₂(PPh₃)₂ ( 1 ) catalyzed hydrosilylation of C?N functionalities. Our results suggest that an ionic S_N2‐Si outer‐sphere pathway involving the heterolytic cleavage of the Si?H bond competes with the hydride pathway involving the C?N bond inserted into the Re?H bond for the rhenium hydride ( 1 ) catalyzed hydrosilylation of the less steric C?N functionalities (phenylmethanimine, PhCH=NH, and N‐phenylbenzylideneimine, PhCH=NPh). The rate‐determining free‐energy barriers for the ionic outer‐sphere pathway are calculated to be ～28.1 and 27.6 kcal mol^?1, respectively. These values are slightly more favorable than those obtained for the hydride pathway (by ～1–3 kcal mol^?1), whereas for the large steric C?N functionality of N,1,1‐tri(phenyl)methanimine (PhCPh=NPh), the ionic outer‐sphere pathway (33.1 kcal mol^?1) is more favorable than the hydride pathway by as much as 11.5 kcal mol^?1. Along the ionic outer‐sphere pathway, neither the multiply bonded oxo ligand nor the inherent hydride moiety participate in the activation of the Si?H bond.     

Mechanism of the Tyrosine Ammonia Lyase Reaction—Tandem Nucleophilic and Electrophilic Enhancement by a Proton Transfer

Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations in tyrosine ammonia lyase (TAL) ruled out the hypothetical Friedel–Crafts (FC) route for ammonia elimination from L ‐tyrosine due to the high energy of FC intermediates. The calculated pathway from the zwitterionic L ‐tyrosine‐binding state (0.0 kcal mol^?1) to the product‐binding state ((E)‐coumarate+H₂N? MIO; ?24.0 kcal mol^?1; MIO=3,5‐dihydro‐5‐methylidene‐4H‐imidazol‐4‐one) involves an intermediate (IS, ?19.9 kcal mol^?1), which has a covalent bond between the N atom of the substrate and MIO, as well as two transition states (TS1 and TS2). TS1 (14.4 kcal mol^?1) corresponds to a proton transfer from the substrate to the N1 atom of MIO by Tyr300? OH. Thus, a tandem nucleophilic activation of the substrate and electrophilic activation of MIO happens. TS2 (5.2 kcal mol^?1) indicates a concerted C? N bond breaking of the N‐MIO intermediate and deprotonation of the pro‐S β position by Tyr60. Calculations elucidate the role of enzymic bases (Tyr60 and Tyr300) and other catalytically relevant residues (Asn203, Arg303, and Asn333, Asn435), which are fully conserved in the amino acid sequences and in 3D structures of all known MIO‐containing ammonia lyases and 2,3‐aminomutases.     

Computational studies on azaphosphiridines, or how to effect ring-opening processes through selective bond activation

The relative energies of azaphosphiridine and its isomers, the ring stability towards valence isomerization, and the ring strain, as well as the kinetics and thermodynamics of possible ring‐opening reactions of P^III derivatives ( 1 – 5 ) and P^V chalcogenides ( 6 – 9 ; O to Te), were studied at high levels of theory (up to CCSD(T)). The barrier to inversion at the nitrogen atom in the trimethyl‐substituted P^III derivative 5 increases from 12.11 to 15.25 kcal mol^?1 in the P‐oxide derivative 6 (P^V); the relatively high barrier to inversion at the phosphorus in 5 (75.38 kcal mol^?1) points to a configurationally stable center (MP2/def2‐TZVPP//BP86/def2‐TZVP). The ring strain for azaphosphiridine 5 (av. 22.6 kcal mol^?1) was found to increase upon P‐oxidation ( 6 ) (30.8 kcal mol^?1; same level of theory). Various ring‐bond‐activation processes were studied: N‐protonation of P^III ( 5 ) and P^V ( 6 , 7 ) derivatives leads to highly activated species that readily undergo P? N bond cleavage. In contrast, metal chlorides such as LiCl, CuCl, CuCl₂, BeCl₂, BCl₃, AlCl₃, TiCl₃, and TiCl₄ show little P? N bond activation in 5 and 7 . Remarkably, TiCl₃ selectively activates the C? N bond, and induces stronger bond activation for P^V ( 6, 7 ) than for P^III azaphosphiridines ( 5 ). The ring‐expanding rearrangement of P^V azaphosphiridines 6 – 9 to yield P^III 1,3,2‐chalcogena‐azaphosphetidines 32 a – d is predicted to be preferred for the heavier chalcogenides 7 – 9 , but not for the P‐oxide 6 . The first comparative analysis of three bond strength parameters is presented: 1) the electron density at bond critical points, 2) Wiberg’s bond index, and 3) the relaxed force constant. This reveals the usefulness of these parameters in assessing the degree of ring bond activation.     

Rearrangements in Model Peptide‐Type Radicals via Intramolecular Hydrogen‐Atom Transfer

Intramolecular H‐atom transfer in model peptide‐type radicals was investigated with high‐level quantum‐chemistry calculations. Examination of 1,2‐, 1,3‐, 1,5‐, and 1,6[C ? N]‐H shifts, 1,4‐ and 1,7[C ? C]‐H shifts, and 1,4[N ? N]‐H shifts (Scheme 1), was carried out with a number of theoretical methods. In the first place, the performance of UB3‐LYP (with the 6‐31G(d), 6‐31G(2df,p), and 6‐311+G(d,p) basis sets) and UMP2 (with the 6‐31G(d) basis set) was assessed for the determination of radical geometries. We found that there is only a small basis‐set dependence for the UB3‐LYP structures, and geometries optimized with UB3‐LYP/6‐31G(d) are generally sufficient for use in conjunction with high‐level composite methods in the determination of improved H‐transfer thermochemistry. Methods assessed in this regard include the high‐level composite methods, G3(MP2)‐RAD, CBS‐QB3, and G3//B3‐LYP, as well as the density‐functional methods B3‐LYP, MPWB1K, and BMK in association with the 6‐31+G(d,p) and 6‐311++G(3df,3pd) basis sets. The high‐level methods give results that are close to one another, while the recently developed functionals MPWB1K and BMK provide cost‐effective alternatives. For the systems considered, the transformation of an N‐centered radical to a C‐centered radical is always exothermic (by 25 kJ ? mol^?1 or more), and this can lead to quite modest barrier heights of less than 60 kJ ? mol^?1 (specifically for 1,5[C ? N]‐H and 1,6[C ? N]‐H shifts). H‐Migration barriers appear to decrease as the ring size in the transition structure (TS) increases, with a lowering of the barrier being found, for example when moving from a rearrangement proceeding via a four‐membered‐ring TS (e.g., the 1,3[C ? N]‐H shift, CH₃? C(O)? NH^. → ^.CH₂? C(O)? NH₂) to a rearrangement proceeding via a six‐membered‐ring TS (e.g., the 1,5[C ? N]‐H shift, ^.NH? CH₂? C(O)? NH? CH₃ → NH₂? CH₂? C(O)? NH? CH₂^.).     

Atomistic understanding of the C·T mismatched DNA base pair tautomerization via the DPT: QM and QTAIM computational approaches

It was established that the cytosine·thymine (C·T) mismatched DNA base pair with cis‐oriented N1H glycosidic bonds has propeller‐like structure (|N3C4C4N3| = 38.4°), which is stabilized by three specific intermolecular interactions–two antiparallel N4H…O4 (5.19 kcal mol^?1) and N3H…N3 (6.33 kcal mol^?1) H‐bonds and a van der Waals (vdW) contact O2…O2 (0.32 kcal mol^?1). The C·T base mispair is thermodynamically stable structure (ΔG_int = ?1.54 kcal mol^?1) and even slightly more stable than the A·T Watson–Crick DNA base pair (ΔG_int = ?1.43 kcal mol^?1) at the room temperature. It was shown that the C·T ? C*·T* tautomerization via the double proton transfer (DPT) is assisted by the O2…O2 vdW contact along the entire range of the intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC). The positive value of the Grunenberg's compliance constants (31.186, 30.265, and 22.166 Å/mdyn for the C·T, C*·T*, and TS_{C·T ? C*·T*}, respectively) proves that the O2…O2 vdW contact is a stabilizing interaction. Based on the sweeps of the H‐bond energies, it was found that the N4H…O4/O4H…N4, and N3H…N3 H‐bonds in the C·T and C*·T* base pairs are anticooperative and weaken each other, whereas the middle N3H…N3 H‐bond and the O2…O2 vdW contact are cooperative and mutually reinforce each other. It was found that the tautomerization of the C·T base mispair through the DPT is concerted and asynchronous reaction that proceeds via the TS_{C·T ? C*·T*} stabilized by the loosened N4? H? O4 covalent bridge, N3H…N3 H‐bond (9.67 kcal mol^?1) and O2…O2 vdW contact (0.41 kcal mol^?1). The nine key points, describing the evolution of the C·T ? C*·T* tautomerization via the DPT, were detected and completely investigated along the IRC. The C*·T* mispair was revealed to be the dynamically unstable structure with a lifetime 2.13·× 10^?13 s. In this case, as for the A·T Watson–Crick DNA base pair, activates the mechanism of the quantum protection of the C·T DNA base mispair from its spontaneous mutagenic tautomerization through the DPT. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Heterolysis of H2 Across a Classical Lewis Pair, 2,6‐Lutidine⋅BCl3: Synthesis,Characterization, and Mechanism

We report that 2,6‐lutidine?trichloroborane (Lut?BCl₃) reacts with H₂ in toluene, bromobenzene, dichloromethane, and Lut solvents producing the neutral hydride, Lut?BHCl₂. The mechanism was modeled with density functional theory, and energies of stationary states were calculated at the G3(MP2)B3 level of theory. Lut?BCl₃ was calculated to react with H₂ and form the ion pair, [LutH⁺][HBCl₃^?], with a barrier of ΔH^≠=24.7 kcal mol^?1 (ΔG^≠=29.8 kcal mol^?1). Metathesis with a second molecule of Lut?BCl₃ produced Lut?BHCl₂ and [LutH⁺][BCl₄^?]. The overall reaction is exothermic by 6.0 kcal mol^?1 (Δ_rG°=?1.1). Alternate pathways were explored involving the borenium cation (LutBCl₂⁺) and the four‐membered boracycle [(CH₂{NC₅H₃Me})BCl₂]. Barriers for addition of H₂ across the Lut/LutBCl₂⁺ pair and the boracycle B?C bond are substantially higher (ΔG^≠=42.1 and 49.4 kcal mol^?1, respectively), such that these pathways are excluded. The barrier for addition of H₂ to the boracycle B?N bond is comparable (ΔH^≠=28.5 and ΔG^≠=32 kcal mol^?1). Conversion of the intermediate 2‐(BHCl₂CH₂)‐6‐Me(C₅H₃NH) to Lut?BHCl₂ may occur by intermolecular steps involving proton/hydride transfers to Lut/BCl₃. Intramolecular protodeboronation, which could form Lut?BHCl₂ directly, is prohibited by a high barrier (ΔH^≠=52, ΔG^≠=51 kcal mol^?1).     

Strong N−X⋅⋅⋅O−N Halogen Bonds: A Comprehensive Study on N‐Halosaccharin Pyridine N‐Oxide Complexes

A study of the strong N?X???^?O?N⁺ (X=I, Br) halogen bonding interactions reports 2×27 donor×acceptor complexes of N‐halosaccharins and pyridine N‐oxides (PyNO). DFT calculations were used to investigate the X???O halogen bond (XB) interaction energies in 54 complexes. A simplified computationally fast electrostatic model was developed for predicting the X???O XBs. The XB interaction energies vary from ?47.5 to ?120.3 kJ mol^?1; the strongest N?I???^?O?N⁺ XBs approaching those of 3‐center‐4‐electron [N?I?N]⁺ halogen‐bonded systems (ca. 160 kJ mol^?1). ¹H NMR association constants (K_XB) determined in CDCl₃ and [D₆]acetone vary from 2.0×10⁰ to >10⁸ m ^?1 and correlate well with the calculated donor×acceptor complexation enthalpies found between ?38.4 and ?77.5 kJ mol^?1. In X‐ray crystal structures, the N‐iodosaccharin‐PyNO complexes manifest short interaction ratios (R_XB) between 0.65–0.67 for the N?I???^?O?N⁺ halogen bond.     

Chemoselectivity as a Delineator of Cuprate Structure in Catalytic 1,4‐Addition of Diorganozinc Reagents to Michael Acceptors

Reaction of the cyclic thioacetal (RS)₂CHCHO [R=1/2×? (CH₂)₃? ] with HCCCOMe, followed by treatment with TsCl/DABCO (Ts=tosyl, DABCO=1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane) affords the mono‐protected 1,4‐benzoquinone dithioacetal. The reactivity of this SR‐protected 1,4‐benzoquinone has been compared with the behavior of the analogous OR‐protected acetal in copper‐catalyzed additions of ZnMe₂ by using chiral phosphoramidite ligands. The activation energy for 1,4‐methylation of the latter OR‐acetals with ZnMe₂ (>95 % ee) has been determined for two CuX₂ pre‐catalysts (X=OAc, 12.2 kcal mol^?1; X=OTf, 6.7 kcal mol^?1; Tf=triflate). The dithioacetal SR aromatizes in the presence of Cu^I/ZnMe₂ giving 1,4‐HOC₆H₄S(CH₂)₃SMe through C? S bond formation. The disparate behavior of these two very closely related substrates is in accordance with the formation of closely related cuprate intermediates that were optimized by DFT calculations, supporting the synthetic and kinetic studies and thus defining the mechanisms of both pathways.     

The fragmentations of [M-H]- anions derived from underivatised peptides. The side-chain loss of H2S from Cys. A joint experimental and theoretical study

Loss of H₂S is the characteristic Cys side‐chain fragmentation of the [M? H]^? anions of Cys‐containing peptides. A combination of experiment and theory suggests that this reaction is initiated from the Cys enolate anion as follows: RNH‐^?C(CH₂SH)CONHR′ Ø [RNHC(?CH₂)CONHR′ (HS^?)] Ø [RNHC(?CH₂)CO‐HNR′‐H]^?+H₂S. This process is facile. Calculations at the HF/6‐31G(d)//AM1 level of theory indicate that the initial anion needs only ≥20.1 kcal mol^?1 of excess energy to effect loss of H₂S. Loss of CH₂S is a minor process, RNHCH(CH₂SH)CON^?‐R′ Ø RNHCH(CH₂S^?)CONHR′ Ø RNH ^?CHCONHR+CH₂S, requiring an excess energy of ≥50.2 kcal mol^?1. When Cys occupies the C‐terminal end of a peptide, the major fragmentation from the [M–H]^? species involves loss of (H₂S+CO₂). A deuterium‐labelling study suggests that this could either be a charge‐remote reaction (a process which occurs remote from and uninfluenced by the charged centre in the molecule), or an anionic reaction initiated from the C‐terminal CO₂^? group. These processes have barriers requiring the starting material to have an excess energy of ≥79.6 (charge‐remote) or ≥67.1 (anion‐directed) kcal mol^?1, respectively, at the HF/6‐31G(d)//AM1 level of theory. The corresponding losses of CH₂O and H₂O from the [M? H]^? anions of Ser‐containing peptides require ≥35.6 and ≥44.4 kcal mol^?1 of excess energy (calculated at the AM1 level of theory), explaining why loss of CH₂O is the characteristic side‐chain loss of Ser in the negative ion mode. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Insight into Oxide‐Bridged Heterobimetallic Al/Zr Olefin Polymerization Catalysts

Reaction of (TBBP)AlMe ? THF with [Cp*₂Zr(Me)OH] gave [(TBBP)Al(THF)?O?Zr(Me)Cp*₂] (TBBP=3,3’,5,5’‐tetra‐tBu‐2,2'‐biphenolato). Reaction of [DIPPnacnacAl(Me)?O?Zr(Me)Cp₂] with [PhMe₂NH]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]^? gave a cationic Al/Zr complex that could be structurally characterized as its THF adduct [(DIPPnacnac)Al(Me)?O?Zr(THF)Cp₂]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]^? (DIPPnacnac=HC[(Me)C=N(2,6‐iPr₂?C₆H₃)]₂). The first complex polymerizes ethene in the presence of an alkylaluminum scavenger but in the absence of methylalumoxane (MAO). The adduct cation is inactive under these conditions. Theoretical calculations show very high energy barriers (ΔG=40–47 kcal mol^?1) for ethene insertion with a bridged AlOZr catalyst. This is due to an unfavorable six‐membered‐ring transition state, in which the methyl group bridges the metal and ethene with an obtuse metal‐Me‐C angle that prevents synchronized bond‐breaking and making. A more‐likely pathway is dissociation of the Al‐O‐Zr complex into an aluminate and the active polymerization catalyst [Cp*₂ZrMe]⁺.     

Interconversion of Molybdenum Imido and Amido Complexes by Proton‐Coupled Electron Transfer

Interconversion of the molybdenum amido [(^PhTpy)(PPh₂Me)₂Mo(NHtBuAr)][BArF²⁴] (^PhTpy=4′‐Ph‐2,2′,6′,2“‐terpyridine; tBuAr=4‐tert‐butyl‐C₆H₄; ArF²⁴=(C₆H₃‐3,5‐(CF₃)₂)₄) and imido [(^PhTpy)(PPh₂Me)₂Mo(NtBuAr)][BArF²⁴] complexes has been accomplished by proton‐coupled electron transfer. The 2,4,6‐tri‐tert‐butylphenoxyl radical was used as an oxidant and the non‐classical ammine complex [(^PhTpy)(PPh₂Me)₂Mo(NH₃)][BArF²⁴] as the reductant. The N?H bond dissociation free energy (BDFE) of the amido N?H bond formed and cleaved in the sequence was experimentally bracketed between 45.8 and 52.3 kcal mol^?1, in agreement with a DFT‐computed value of 48 kcal mol^?1. The N?H BDFE in combination with electrochemical data eliminate proton transfer as the first step in the N?H bond‐forming sequence and favor initial electron transfer or concerted pathways.     

Thermal [1,5] sigmatropic rearrangements in (σ-7-cycloheptatrienyl)triphenyltin and (σ-5-cyclohepta-1,3-dienyl)triphenyltin: A 1H and 13C NMR reinvestigation

It has been confirmed by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies that Sn(σ-C₇H₇)Ph₃ undergoes either 1,4- or 1,5-shifts of the SnPh₃ moiety around the cycloheptatrienyl ring with ΔH³ = 13.8 ± 0.4 kcal mol^?1, ΔS3 = ?5.6 ± 1.2 cal mol^?1 deg^?1, and ΔG³₃₀₀ = 15.44 ± 0.14 kcal mol^?1. Similarly, (σ-5-cyclohepta-1,3-dienyl)triphenyltin undergoes 1,5-shifts with ΔH³ = 12.4 ± 0.6 kcal mol^?1, ΔS³ = ?11.2 ± 1.8 cal mol^?1 deg^?1, and ΔG³₃₀₀ = 15.76 ± 0.13 kcal mol^?1. It is therefore probable that Sn(σ-5-C₅H₅)R₃ and Sn(σ-3-indenyl)R₃ do not undergo 1,2-shifts as previously suggested but really undergo 1,5-shifts.     

σ‐Insertive Mechanism versus Concerted Non‐insertive Mechanism in the Intramolecular Hydroamination of Aminoalkenes Catalyzed by Phenoxyamine Magnesium Complexes: A Synthetic and Computational Study

The phenoxyamine magnesium complexes [{ONN}MgCH₂Ph] ( 4 a : {ONN}=2,4‐tBu₂‐6‐(CH₂NMeCH₂CH₂NMe₂)C₆H₂O^?; 4 b : {ONN}=4‐tBu‐2‐(CH₂NMeCH₂CH₂NMe₂)‐6‐(SiPh₃)C₆H₂O^?) have been prepared and investigated with respect to their catalytic activity in the intramolecular hydroamination of aminoalkenes. The sterically more shielded triphenylsilyl‐substituted complex 4 b exhibits better thermal stability and higher catalytic activity. Kinetic investigations using complex 4 b in the cyclisation of 1‐allylcyclohexyl)methylamine ( 5 b ), respectively, 2,2‐dimethylpent‐4‐en‐1‐amine ( 5 c ), reveal a first‐order rate dependence on substrate and catalyst concentration. A significant primary kinetic isotope effect of 3.9±0.2 in the cyclisation of 5 b suggests significant N?H bond disruption in the rate‐determining transition state. The stoichiometric reaction of 4 b with 5 c revealed that at least two substrate molecules are required per magnesium centre to facilitate cyclisation. The reaction mechanism was further scrutinized computationally by examination of two rivalling mechanistic pathways. One scenario involves a coordinated amine molecule assisting in a concerted non‐insertive N?C ring closure with concurrent amino proton transfer from the amine onto the olefin, effectively combining the insertion and protonolysis step to a single step. The alternative mechanistic scenario involves a reversible olefin insertion step followed by rate‐determining protonolysis. DFT reveals that a proton‐assisted concerted N?C/C?H bond‐forming pathway is energetically prohibitive in comparison to the kinetically less demanding σ‐insertive pathway (ΔΔG^≠=5.6 kcal mol^?1). Thus, the σ‐insertive pathway is likely traversed exclusively. The DFT predicted total barrier of 23.1 kcal mol^?1 (relative to the {ONN}Mg pyrrolide catalyst resting state) for magnesium?alkyl bond aminolysis matches the experimentally determined Eyring parameter (ΔG^≠=24.1(±0.6) kcal mol^?1 (298 K)) gratifyingly well.     

Nature of the interaction between ammonia derivatives and carbon disulfide. A theoretical investigation

The interactions between NH₃, its methylated and chlorinated derivatives and CS₂ are investigated by ab initio CCSD(T) and density functional BLYP‐D3 methods. The CCSD(T)/aug‐cc‐pVTZ calculated interaction energies of complexes characterized by the S···N chalcogen bonds range between ?1.71 and ?2.78 kcal mol^?1. The S···N bonds are studied by atoms in molecules, natural bond orbital, and noncovalent interaction methods. The lack of correlation between the interaction energies of methylated amines complexes and the electrostatic potential results from the lone pair effect in aliphatic amines. Different structures of CS₂ complexed with ammonia derivatives, stabilized by other than the S···N chalcogen bonds, are also predicted. These structures are characterized by interaction energies ranging between 1.15 and 3.46 kcal mol^?1. The results show that the complexing ability of CS₂ is not very high but this molecule is able to attack the electrophilic or nucleophilic sites of a guest molecule.     

First Principles (DFT) Characterization of RhI/dppp‐Catalyzed CH Activation by Tandem 1,2‐Addition/1,4‐Rh Shift Reactions of Norbornene to Phenylboronic Acid

The C?H activation in the tandem, “merry‐go‐round”, [(dppp)Rh]‐catalyzed (dppp=1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane), four‐fold addition of norborene to PhB(OH)₂ has been postulated to occur by a C(alkyl)?H oxidative addition to square‐pyramidal Rh^III?H species, which in turn undergoes a C(aryl)?H reductive elimination. Our DFT calculations confirm the Rh^I/Rh^III mechanism. At the IEFPCM(toluene, 373.15 K)/PBE0/DGDZVP level of theory, the oxidative addition barrier was calculated to be 12.9 kcal mol^?1, and that of reductive elimination was 5.0 kcal mol^?1. The observed selectivity of the reaction correlates well with the relative energy barriers of the cycle steps. The higher barrier (20.9 kcal mol^?1) for norbornyl–Rh protonation ensures that the reaction is steered towards the 1,4‐shift (total barrier of 16.3 kcal mol^?1), acting as an equilibration shuttle. The carborhodation (13.2 kcal mol^?1) proceeds through a lower barrier than the protonation (16.7 kcal mol^?1) of the rearranged aryl–Rh species in the absence of o‐ or m‐substituents, ensuring multiple carborhodations take place. However, for 2,5‐dimethylphenyl, which was used as a model substrate, the barrier for carborhodation is increased to 19.4 kcal mol^?1, explaining the observed termination of the reaction at 1,2,3,4‐tetra(exo‐norborn‐2‐yl)benzene. Finally, calculations with (Z)‐2‐butene gave a carborhodation barrier of 20.2 kcal mol^?1, suggesting that carborhodation of non‐strained, open‐chain substrates would be disfavored relative to protonation.     

A Highly Oxidizing and Isolable Oxoruthenium(V) Complex [RuV(N4O)(O)]2+: Electronic Structure,Redox Properties,and Oxidation Reactions Investigated by DFT Calculations

The electronic structure and redox properties of the highly oxidizing, isolable Ru^V?O complex [Ru^V(N₄O)(O)]²⁺, its oxidation reactions with saturated alkanes (cyclohexane and methane) and inorganic substrates (hydrochloric acid and water), and its intermolecular coupling reaction have been examined by DFT calculations. The oxidation reactions with cyclohexane and methane proceed through hydrogen atom transfer in a transition state with a calculated free energy barrier of 10.8 and 23.8 kcal mol^?1, respectively. The overall free energy activation barrier (ΔG^≠=25.5 kcal mol^?1) of oxidation of hydrochloric acid can be decomposed into two parts: the formation of [Ru^III(N₄O)(HOCl)]²⁺ (ΔG=15.0 kcal mol^?1) and the substitution of HOCl by a water molecule (ΔG^≠=10.5 kcal mol^?1). For water oxidation, nucleophilic attack on Ru^V?O by water, leading to O? O bond formation, has a free energy barrier of 24.0 kcal mol^?1, the major component of which comes from the cleavage of the H? OH bond of water. Intermolecular self‐coupling of two molecules of [Ru^V(N₄O)(O)]²⁺ leads to the [(N₄O)Ru^IV? O₂? Ru^III(N₄O)]⁴⁺ complex with a calculated free energy barrier of 12.0 kcal mol^?1.     

How different is pyrimidine as a core component of DNA base from its diazine isomers: A DFT study?

Recent photoemission spectroscopic (X‐ray photoemission spectra) study revealed less dramatic chemical changes for pyrimidine (PyM, 1, 3‐diazine) with in its ionization potential. Present systematic study using density functional theory calculations shows that PyM is indeed quite different from its diazine isomers (PyD, 1, 2‐diazine and PyA, 1, 4‐diazine). It is discovered that the most stable isomer PyM is relaxed from C_2V to C₁ point symmetry with a total electronic energy deduction of ?15.86 kcal.mol^?1. Although not substantial, PyM has the smallest molecule shape (electronic spatial extent) and the largest HOMO‐LUMO energy gap of 5.65 eV; only one absorption band in the region of 200–300 nm of the UV‐Vis spectrum but three clusters of chemical shift in the carbon and hydrogen NMR spectra. The energy decomposition analyses revealed that the interaction energy (ΔE_Int) of PyM is preferred over PyA by 4.08 kcal.mol^?1 and over PyD by 22.32 kcal.mol^?1, with the preferred N? C? N bond revealed by graph theory.     

Chiral Lithiated Allylic α‐Sulfonyl Carbanions: Experimental and Computational Study of Their Structure,Configurational Stability,and Enantioselective Synthesis

X‐ray crystal structure analysis of the lithiated allylic α‐sulfonyl carbanions [CH₂?CHC(Me)SO₂Ph]Li ? diglyme, [cC₆H₈SO₂tBu]Li ? PMDETA and [cC₇H₁₀SO₂tBu]Li ? PMDETA showed dimeric and monomeric CIPs, having nearly planar anionic C atoms, only O?Li bonds, almost planar allylic units with strong C?C bond length alternation and the s‐trans conformation around C1?C2. They adopt a C1?S conformation, which is similar to the one generally found for alkyl and aryl substituted α‐sulfonyl carbanions. Cryoscopy of [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF at 164 K revealed an equilibrium between monomers and dimers in a ratio of 83:17, which is similar to the one found by low temperature NMR spectroscopy. According to NMR spectroscopy the lone‐pair orbital at C1 strongly interacts with the C?C double bond. Low temperature ⁶Li,¹H NOE experiments of [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF point to an equilibrium between monomeric CIPs having only O?Li bonds and CIPs having both O?Li and C1?Li bonds. Ab initio calculation of [MeCH?CHC(Me)SO₂Me]Li ? (Me₂O)₂ gave three isomeric CIPs having the s‐trans conformation and three isomeric CIPs having the s‐cis conformation around the C1?C2 bond. All s‐trans isomers are more stable than the s‐cis isomers. At all levels of theory the s‐trans isomer having O?Li and C1?Li bonds is the most stable one followed by the isomer which has two O?Li bonds. The allylic unit of the C,O,Li isomer shows strong bond length alternation and the C1 atom is in contrast to the O,Li isomer significantly pyramidalized. According to NBO analysis of the s‐trans and s‐cis isomers, the interaction of the lone pair at C1 with the π* orbital of the CC double bond is energetically much more favorable than that with the “empty” orbitals at the Li atom. The C1?S and C1?C2 conformations are determined by the stereoelectronic effects n_C–σ_SR* interaction and allylic conjugation. ¹H DNMR spectroscopy of racemic [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li, [iPrCH?CHC(iPr)SO₂tBu]Li and [EtCH?C(Me)C(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in [D₈]THF gave estimated barriers of enantiomerization of ΔG^≠=13.2 kcal mol^?1 (270 K), 14.2 kcal mol^?1 (291 K) and 14.2 kcal mol^?1 (295 K), respectively. Deprotonation of sulfone (R)‐EtCH?CHCH(Et)SO₂tBu (94 % ee) with nBuLi in THF at ?105 °C occurred with a calculated enantioselectivity of 93 % ee and gave carbanion (M)‐[EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li, the deuteration and alkylation of which with CF₃CO₂D and MeOCH₂I, respectively, proceeded with high enantioselectivities. Time‐dependent deuteration of the enantioenriched carbanion (M)‐[EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF gave a racemization barrier of ΔG^≠=12.5 kcal mol^?1 (168 K), which translates to a calculated half‐time of racemization of t_1/2=12 min at ?105 °C.     

Push–Pull Buta‐1,2,3‐trienes: Exceptionally Low Rotational Barriers of Cumulenic CC Bonds and Proacetylenic Reactivity

A variety of asymmetrically donor–acceptor‐substituted [3]cumulenes (buta‐1,2,3‐trienes) were synthesized by developed procedures. The activation barriers to rotation ΔG^≠ were measured by variable temperature NMR spectroscopy and found to be as low as 11.8 kcal mol^?1, in the range of the barriers for rotation around sterically hindered single bonds. The central C?C bond of the push–pull‐substituted [3]cumulene moiety is shortened down to 1.22 Å as measured by X‐ray crystallography, leading to a substantial bond length alternation (BLA) of up to 0.17 Å. All the experimental results are supported by DFT calculations. Zwitterionic transition states (TS) of bond rotation confirm the postulated proacetylenic character of donor–acceptor [3]cumulenes. Additional support for the proacetylenic character of these chromophores is provided by their reaction with tetracyanoethene (TCNE) in a cycloaddition‐retroelectrocyclization (CA–RE) cascade characteristic of donor‐polarized acetylenes.