Novel cyclohexyl‐based aminophosphine ligands and use of their Ru(II) complexes in transfer hydrogenation of ketones

Two new aminophosphines – furfuryl‐(N‐dicyclohexylphosphino)amine, [Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃O] ( 1 ) and thiophene‐(N‐dicyclohexylphosphino)amine, [Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃S] ( 2 ) – were prepared by the reaction of chlorodicyclohexylphosphine with furfurylamine and thiophene‐2‐methylamine. Reaction of the aminophosphines with [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(μ‐Cl)Cl]₂ or [Ru(η⁶‐benzene)(μ‐Cl)Cl]₂ gave corresponding complexes [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃O)(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₂] ( 1a ), [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃O)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂] ( 1b ), [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃S)(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₂] ( 2a ) and [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃S)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂] ( 2b ), respectively, which are suitable catalyst precursors for the transfer hydrogenation of ketones. In particular, [Ru(Cy₂PNHCH₂–C₄H₃S)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂] acts as a good catalyst, giving the corresponding alcohols in 98–99% yield in 30 min at 82 °C (up to time of flight ≤ 588 h^?1). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Highly Effective Ru/BaCeO3 Catalysts on Supports with Strong Basic Sites for Ammonia Synthesis

BaCeO₃‐a and BaCeO₃‐b, with strong basic sites, were synthesized by using a co‐precipitation method at different calcination temperatures, and used as supports to evaluate their performance in ammonia synthesis. The ammonia synthesis rate with the 1.25 % Ru/BaCeO₃‐a catalyst is 24 mmol g^?1 h^?1, which is higher than that of 1.25 % Ru/BaCeO₃‐b catalyst (18 mmol g^?1 h^?1) at 3 MPa and 450 °C. Moreover, the performance of the 4 % Cs‐1.25 % Ru/BaCeO₃‐a catalyst was further improved to 28 mmol g^?1 h^?1, and no sign of deactivation was observed after a reaction time of 120 h. The XPS and H₂ temperature‐programmed reduction analyses indicated that the Ru/BaCeO₃‐a catalyst has more oxygen vacancies than the Ru/BaCeO₃‐b catalyst. In addition, the average Ru particle size of the Ru/BaCeO₃‐a catalyst is closer to 2 nm than the Ru/BaCeO₃‐b catalyst, which promotes the generation of B₅‐type sites (the active site for N₂ dissociation). The CO₂ temperature‐programmed desorption analysis indicates that BaCeO₃‐a has a high basic density, which is beneficial for electron transfer to Ru and further facilitates the dissociation of N≡N bonds.     

The Modifiable Character of a Novel Ru-Fe-B/ZrO2 Catalyst for Benzene Selective Hydrogenation to Cyclohexene

A novel Ru‐Fe‐B/ZrO₂ catalyst for the selective hydrogenation of benzene to cyclohexene was prepared by the chemical reduction method. A yield of cyclohexene of 57.3% was achieved at benzene conversion of 80.6% on this catalyst. The activity and yield of cyclohexene were higher than those studied previously. The structural characterizations of the catalyst were performed by TEM‐SAED, XRD, and N₂‐physisorption. Moreover, cyclohexene selectivities on this catalyst increased and the activities decreased with the increase of the ZnO dosages, however, the activities increased and cyclohexene selectivities decreased with the increase of the H₂SO₄ dosages. Different feeding manners of H₂SO₄ or ZnO exerted definitely influence on the performances of this catalyst, but the degrees of influence were different due to the character of chemisorptions. Furthermore, the activity and cyclohexene selectivity on the catalysts could be reversibly modified by adding H₂SO₄ or ZnO into reaction slurry, which provides an easy method to recover the activity and selectivity of Ru‐Fe‐B/ZrO₂ catalysts during the process of producing cyclohexene. And the modifiable mechanisms involved were speculated.     

ZnSO4和La2O3作共修饰剂单金属Ru催化剂上苯选择加氢制环己烯

用沉淀法制备了单金属纳米Ru（0）催化剂,考察了ZnSO₄和La₂O₃作共修饰剂对该催化剂催化苯选择加氢制环己烯性能的影响,并用X射线衍射（XRD）、X射线荧光（XRF）光谱、X射线光电子能谱（XPS）、俄歇电子能谱（AES）、透射电镜（TEM）和N₂物理吸附等手段对加氢前后催化剂进行了表征. 结果表明,在ZnSO₄存在下,随着添加碱性La₂O₃量的增加,ZnSO₄水解生成的（Zn（OH）₂）₃（ZnSO₄）（H₂O）_x（x=1,3）盐量增加,催化剂活性单调降低,环己烯选择性单调升高. 当La₂O₃/Ru 物质的量比为0.075 时,Ru催化剂上苯转化率为77.6%,环己烯选择性和收率分别为75.2%和58.4%. 且该催化体系具有良好的重复使用性能. 传质计算结果表明,苯、环己烯和氢气的液-固扩散限制和孔内扩散限制都可忽略. 因此,高环己烯选择性和收率的获得不能简单归结为物理效应,而与催化剂的结构和催化体系密切相关. 根据实验结果,我们推测在化学吸附有（Zn（OH）₂）₃（ZnSO₄）（H₂O）_x（x=1,3）盐的Ru（0）催化剂有两种活化苯的活性位：Ru⁰和Zn²⁺. 因为Zn²⁺将部分电子转移给了Ru,Zn²⁺活化苯的能力比Ru⁰弱. 同时由于Ru和Zn²⁺的原子半径接近,Zn²⁺可以覆盖一部分Ru⁰活性位,导致解离H₂的Ru⁰活性位减少. 这导致了Zn²⁺上活化的苯只能加氢生成环己烯和Ru（0）催化剂活性的降低. 本文利用双活性位模型来解释Ru基催化剂上的苯加氢反应,并用Hückel分子轨道理论说明了该模型的合理性.     

Synthesis new Co–Mn mixed oxide catalyst for the production of light olefins by tuning the catalyst structure

In order to increase the catalyst activity for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS), the preparation methods of two new catalysts were studied. The chemically identical bimetallic Co–Mn/Al₂O₃ catalysts were synthesized by different synthetic methods: (a) via thermal decomposition of the complex [Co_1.33Mn_0.667(C₇H₃NO₄)₂(H₂O)₅].2H₂O ( 1 ) and (b) by the impregnation technique. The complex was characterized by the single‐crystal analysis, elemental analysis, and Fourier‐transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy. Both catalysts were characterized by powder X‐ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X‐ray spectrometry (EDS), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area, hydrogen temperature‐programmed reduction (H₂‐TPR), and H₂‐chemisorption. The catalysts' activity was investigated for the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in a fixed bed microreactor. Higher activity was obtained for the catalyst prepared by thermal decomposition of the inorganic precursor due to its small particle size, superior dispersion, and higher surface area. The results show that the catalyst prepared thermal decomposition has 21% ethylene, 10% propylene, and 50% C₅⁺ selectivity, while methane selectivity of this catalyst is 11% at 250°C. On the other hand, the catalyst obtained by the impregnation method displays 15% ethylene, 8% propylene, 29% C₅⁺_, and 29% methane selectivity at the same temperature.     

Ruthenium bidentate phosphine complexes for the coordination and catalytic dehydrogenation of amine- and phosphine-boranes

Addition of the amine–boranes H₃B ? NH₂tBu, H₃B ? NHMe₂ and H₃B ? NH₃ to the cationic ruthenium fragment [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(OH₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; xantphos=4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene; BAr^F₄=[B{3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄]^?) affords the η¹‐B? H bound amine–borane complexes [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₂tBu)H][BAr^F₄] ( 5 ), [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NHMe₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 6 ) and [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₃)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ). The X‐ray crystal structures of 5 and 7 have been determined with [BAr^F₄] and [BPh₄] anions, respectively. Treatment of 2 with H₃B ? PHPh₂ resulted in quite different behaviour, with cleavage of the B? P interaction taking place to generate the structurally characterised bis‐secondary phosphine complex [Ru(xantphos)(PHPh₂)₂H][BPh₄] ( 9 ). The xantphos complexes 2 , 5 and 9 proved to be poor precursors for the catalytic dehydrogenation of H₃B ? NHMe₂. While the dppf species (dppf=1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) [Ru(dppf)(PPh₃)HCl] ( 3 ) and [Ru(dppf)(η⁶‐C₆H₅PPh₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 4 ) showed better, but still moderate activity, the agostic‐stabilised N‐heterocyclic carbene derivative [Ru(dppf)(ICy)HCl] ( 12 ; ICy=1,3‐dicyclohexylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) proved to be the most efficient catalyst with a turnover number of 76 h^?1 at room temperature.     

Ceria supported Ru~0-Ru~(δ+) clusters as efficient catalyst for arenes hydrogenation

Selective hydrogenation of aromatic amines,especially chemicals such as aniline and bis(4-aminocyclohexyl)methane for non-yellowing polyurethane,is of particular interests due to the extensive applications.To conquer the existing difficulties,in selective hydrogenation,,the Ru~0-Ru~(δ+)/CeO_2 catalyst with solid frustrated Lewis pairs was developed for aromatic amines hydrogenation with excellent activity and selectivity under relative milder conditions.The morphology,electronic and chemical properties,especially the Ru~O-Ru~(δ+) clusters and reducible ceria were characterized by X-ray diffraction(XRD),transmission electron microscopy(TEM),sca nning electronic microscopy(SEM),X-ray photoelectron sp ectroscopy(XPS),CO_2 tempe rature programmed deso rption(CO_2-TPD),H_2 tempe rature programmed reduction(H_2-TPR),H_2 diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy(H_2-DRIFT),Raman,etc.The 2% Ru/CeO_2 catalyst exhibited good conversion of 95% and selectivity greater than 99% toward cyclohexylamine.The volcano curve describing the activity and Ru state was found.Owning to the "acidic site isolation" by surrounding alkaline sites,condensation between the neighboring amine molecules could be effectively suppressed.The catalyst also showed good stability and applicability for other aromatic amines and heteroarenes containing different functional groups.     

Tris(2,2′‐bipyridine)ruthenium Derivatives with Multiple Viologen Acceptors: Quadratic Dependence of Photocatalytic H2 Evolution Rate on the Local Concentration of the Acceptor Site

Three Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ derivatives tethered to multiple viologen acceptors, [Ru(bpy)₂(4,4′‐MV2)]⁶⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(4,4′‐MV4)]¹⁰⁺, and [Ru(bpy)(4,4′‐MV4)₂]¹⁸⁺ [bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, 4,4′‐MV2=4‐ethoxycarbonyl‐4′‐(N‐G₁‐carbamoyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine, and 4,4′‐MV4=4,4′‐bis(N‐G₁‐carbamoyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine, where G₁=Asp(NHG₂)‐NHG₂ and G₂=‐(CH₂)₂‐N⁺C₅H₄‐C₅H₄N⁺‐CH₃] were prepared as “photo‐charge separators (PCSs)”. Photoirradiation of these complexes in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor (EDTA) results in storage of electrons per PCS values of 1.3, 2.7, and 4.6, respectively. Their applications in the photochemical H₂ evolution from water in the presence of a colloidal Pt H₂‐evolving catalyst were investigated, and are discussed along with those reported for [Ru(bpy)₂(5,5′‐MV4)]¹⁰⁺, [Ru(4,4′‐MV4)₃]²⁶⁺, and [Ru(5,5′‐MV4)₃]²⁶⁺ (Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016 , 3, 671–680). The PCSs with high dimerization constants (K_d=10⁵–10⁶ m ^?1) are superior in driving H₂ evolution at pH 5.0, whereas those with lower K_d values (10³–10⁴ m ^?1) are superior at pH 7.0, where K_d=[(MV⁺)₂]/[MV^{+ .} ]². The (MV⁺)₂ site can drive H₂ evolution only at pH 5.0 as a result of its 0.15 eV lower driving force for H₂ evolution relative to MV^{+ .} , whereas the PCSs with lower K_d values exhibit higher performance at pH 7.0 owing to the higher population of free MV^{+ .} . Importantly, the rate of electron charging over the PCSs is linear to the apparent H₂ evolution rate, and shows an intriguing quadratic dependence on the number of MV²⁺ units per PCS.     

Ultrasound-assisted synthesis of monodisperse Ru–B amorphous alloys with enhanced catalytic activity in maltose hydrogenation

Monodisperse Ru–B amorphous alloy catalysts were synthesized by ultrasound-assisted chemical reduction of (NH₄)₂RuCl₆ with BH ₄ ^? . With the characterization of X-ray diffraction (XRD), selective area electronic diffraction (SAED), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the resulting Ru–B nanoparticles were identified to be amorphous alloys ranging in size from 2.4 to 4.9 nm. During liquid-phase maltose hydrogenation, the as-synthesized Ru–B catalyst was extremely active compared to the regular Ru–B obtained via the reduction of RuCl₃ with BH ₄ ^? . The Ru–B sample prepared under ultrasonication with 60 W was proven to be the most active catalyst. Its catalytic activity was nearly 11 times that of industrial Raney Ni, and could be used repetitively for more than six times without significant deactivation.     

Applications of transition metal complexes containing aminophosphine ligand to transfer hydrogenation of ketones

Hydrogen transfer reduction processes are attracting increasing interest from synthetic chemists in view of their operational simplicity. Reaction of [Ph₂PNHCH₂‐C₄H₃S] with [Ru(η⁶‐benzene)(µ‐Cl)Cl]₂, [Rh(µ‐Cl)(cod)]₂ and [Ir(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(µ‐Cl)Cl]₂ gave a range of new monodendate complexes [Ru(Ph₂PNHCH₂‐C₄H₃S)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂], 1, [Rh(Ph₂PNHCH₂‐C₄H₃S)(cod)Cl], 2, and [Ir(Ph₂PNHCH₂‐C₄H₃S)(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Cl₂], 3, respectively. All new complexes were fully characterized by analytical and spectroscopic methods. ¹H? ³¹P NMR, ¹H? ¹³C HETCOR or ¹H? ¹H COSY correlation experiments were used to confirm the spectral assignments. 1–3 are suitable catalyst precursors for the transfer hydrogenation of acetophenone derivatives. Notably [Ru(Ph₂PNHCH₂‐C₄H₃S)(η⁶‐benzene)Cl₂], 1, acts as an excellent catalyst, giving the corresponding alcohols in 98–99% yields in 30 min at 82 °C (TOF ≤200 h^?1) for the transfer hydrogenation reaction in comparison to analogous rhodium or iridium complexes. This transfer hydrogenation is characterized by low reversibility under these conditions. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Role of ZnNb2O6 in ZnO-promoted amorphous-Nb2O5 supported Ru catalyst for the partial hydrogenation of benzene

Ruthenium catalysts supported on zinc-promoted amorphous-niobium mixed oxides were prepared, characterized, and studied in the additive-free partial hydrogenation of benzene reaction. The amorphous matrix of Nb₂O₅ was responsible for a highly active Ru/Nb₂O₅ catalyst, although less selective than those containing zinc. The ZnO-containing supports were prepared by wet impregnation technique, followed by incipient wetness of ruthenium chloride salt. The catalysts were characterized by textural analysis, X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, H₂ chemisorption, temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), Scanning electron microscopy, H₂ temperature-programmed desorption, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the calcined-reduced samples. Chlorine retention was observed on zinc-containing samples. An unexpected ZnNb₂O₆ oxide phase, ascribed to a selectivity increase with less activity loss, was obtained for the supports at lower temperatures than those related on the literature. A very complex electronic environment of Ru- and Zn-containing species interactions was observed by TPR. The presence of surface-reduced (Ru⁰) and partially reduced (Ru^δ+) Ru species observed by XPS justified well, respectively, the activity and selectivity achieved with every catalyst. The addition of water as a solvent resulted in very constant yield to cyclohexene, as expected, despite activity diminution due to low solubility of the reactants.     

Electrochemical and physical characterization of Pt–Ru alloy catalyst deposited onto microporous–mesoporous carbon support derived from Mo2C at 600 °C

The electrochemical reduction of oxygen on binary Pt–Ru alloy deposited onto microporous–mesoporous carbon support was studied in 0.5 M H₂SO₄ solution using cyclic voltammetry, rotating disk electrode (RDE), and impedance method. The microporous–mesoporous carbon support C(Mo₂C) with specific surface area of 1,990 m²?g^?1 was prepared from Mo₂C at 600 °C using the chlorination method. Analysis of X-ray diffraction, photoelectron spectroscopy, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy data confirms that the Pt–Ru alloy has been formed and the atomic fraction of Ru in the alloy was ～0.5. High cathodic oxygen reduction current densities (?160 A?m^?2 at 3,000 rev?min^?1) have been measured by the RDE method. The O₂ diffusion constant (1.9?±?0.3?×?10^?5?cm²?s^?1) and the number of electrons transferred per electroreduction of one O₂ molecule (～4), calculated from the Levich and Koutecky–Levich plots, are in agreement with literature data. Similarly to the Ru/RuO₂ system in H₂SO₄ aqueous solution, nearly capacitive behavior was observed from impedance data at very low ac frequencies, explained by slow electrical double-layer formation limited by the adsorption of reaction intermediates and products into microporous–mesoporous Pt–Ru–C(Mo₂C) catalyst. All results obtained for C(Mo₂C) and Pt–Ru–C(Mo₂C) electrodes have been compared with corresponding data for commercial carbon VULCAN® XC72 (C(Vulcan)) and Pt–Ru–C(Vulcan) electrodes processed and measured in the same experimental conditions. Higher activity for C(Mo₂C) and Pt–Ru–C(Mo₂C) has been demonstrated.     

Ru/Ni/MgAl<Subscript>2</Subscript>O<Subscript>4</Subscript> catalysts for steam reforming of methane: effects of Ru content on self-activation property

The effects of Ru on the self-reducibility of Ru-doped Ni/MgAl₂O₄ catalysts, which do not need pre-reduction treatment with H₂, were investigated in the steam reforming of methane (SRM). The Ru-promoted Ni/MgAl₂O₄ catalysts with various amounts of Ru (0–0.5 wt%) were prepared by stepwise impregnation and co-impregnation methods using hydrotalcite-like MgAl₂O₄ support. For comparison, Ru/MgAl₂O₄ catalysts with the same amount of Ru were also prepared by the impregnation method. The catalysts were characterized by the N₂-sorption, XRD, H₂-TPR, H₂-chemisorption, and XPS methods. Ni/MgAl₂O₄ catalyst in the presence of even the trace amount of Ru (Ru content ≥0.05 wt%) showed higher conversion without pre-reduction as compared to Ru/MgAl₂O₄ catalysts in SRM under the same conditions. The self-activation of Ru–Ni/MgAl₂O₄ catalysts is mainly attributed to the spillover of hydrogen, which is produced on Ru at first and then reduces NiO species under reaction conditions. Besides, Ru doping makes the reduction of NiO easier. The stepwise impregnated Ru/Ni/MgAl₂O₄ catalyst produced superior performance as compared to co-impregnated Ru–Ni/MgAl₂O₄ catalyst for SRM.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of RuII Complexes with Trimethylsilylethinylamidinate Ligands

The mononuclear amidinate complexes [(η⁶‐cymene)‐RuCl( 1a )] ( 2 ) and [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)RuCl( 1b )] ( 3 ), with the trimethylsilyl‐ethinylamidinate ligands [Me₃SiC≡CC(N‐c‐C₆H₁₁)₂]^– ( 1a^– ) and[Me₃SiC≡CC(N‐i‐C₃H₇)₂]^– ( 1b^– ) were synthesized in high yields by salt metathesis. In addition, the related phosphane complexes[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )] ( 4a ) [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )] ( 4b ), and [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)Ru(PPh₃)( 1b )](BF₄) ( 5 ‐BF₄) were prepared by ligand exchange reactions. Investigations on the removal of the trimethyl‐silyl group using [Bu₄N]F resulted in the isolation of [(η⁶‐C₆H₆)Ru(PPh₃){(N‐i‐C₃H₇)₂CC≡CH}](BF₄) ( 6 ‐BF₄) bearing a terminal alkynyl hydrogen atom, while 2 and 3 revealed to yield intricate reaction mixtures. Compounds 1a / b to 6 ‐BF₄ were characterized by multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P) and IR spectroscopy and elemental analyses, including X‐ray diffraction analysis of 1b , 2 , and 3 .     

Influence of Cyclopentadienyl Ring‐Tilt on Electron‐Transfer Reactions: Redox‐Induced Reactivity of Strained [2] and [3]Ruthenocenophanes

In contrast to ruthenocene [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)₂] and dimethylruthenocene [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄Me)₂] ( 7 ), chemical oxidation of highly strained, ring‐tilted [2]ruthenocenophane [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CH₂)₂] ( 5 ) and slightly strained [3]ruthenocenophane [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CH₂)₃] ( 6 ) with cationic oxidants containing the non‐coordinating [B(C₆F₅)₄]^? anion was found to afford stable and isolable metal?metal bonded dicationic dimer salts [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CH₂)₂]₂[B(C₆F₅)₄]₂ ( 8 ) and [Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂(CH₂)₃]₂[B(C₆F₅)₄]₂ ( 17 ), respectively. Cyclic voltammetry and DFT studies indicated that the oxidation potential, propensity for dimerization, and strength of the resulting Ru?Ru bond is strongly dependent on the degree of tilt present in 5 and 6 and thereby degree of exposure of the Ru center. Cleavage of the Ru?Ru bond in 8 was achieved through reaction with the radical source [(CH₃)₂NC(S)S?SC(S)N(CH₃)₂] (thiram), affording unusual dimer [(CH₃)₂NCS₂Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η³‐C₅H₄)C₂H₄]₂[B(C₆F₅)₄]₂ ( 9 ) through a haptotropic η⁵–η³ ring‐slippage followed by an apparent [2+2] cyclodimerization of the cyclopentadienyl ligand. Analogs of possible intermediates in the reaction pathway [C₆H₅ERu(η⁵‐C₅H₄)₂C₂H₄][B(C₆F₅)₄] [E=S ( 15 ) or Se ( 16 )] were synthesized through reaction of 8 with C₆H₅E?EC₆H₅ (E=S or Se).     

Ru 前驱体对 Ru/MgO-CeO2 氨合成催化剂性能的影响

 分别以 K₂RuO₄, Ru(Ac)₃ 和 RuCl₃ 为 Ru 前驱体, 制备了 Ru/MgO-CeO₂ 催化剂, 并运用 X 射线衍射、X 射线荧光光谱, CO 吸附、N₂ 物理吸附和 H₂程序升温还原等技术对催化剂进行了表征, 考察了 Ru 前驱体对 Ru/MgO-CeO₂ 催化剂氨合成性能的影响. 结果表明, Ru 前驱体对载体 MgO-CeO₂ 和 Ru 的还原性能、氯残留量和催化剂比表面积的影响都很大, 从而导致催化剂的氨合成性能的不同. 其中以 K₂RuO₄ 为 Ru 前驱体制备的催化剂的载体和 Ru 容易还原, 无氯离子, 且比表面积较高, 因而催化剂活性和氨合成转换频率较高. 在 10 MPa, 425 °C, 10 000 h^-1 条件下, K₂RuO₄, Ru(Ac)₃ 和 RuCl₃ 作前驱体制备的催化剂上氨合成转换频率比为 1.33:1.05:1.     

Mononuclear Complexes of Platinum Group Metals Containing η6‐ and η5‐Cyclic Π‐Perimeter Hydrocarbon and Pyridylpyrazolyl Derivatives: Syntheses and Structural Studies

Piano‐stool‐shaped platinum group metal compounds, stable in the solid state and in solution, which are based on 2‐(5‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine ( L ) with the formulas [(η⁶‐arene)Ru( L )Cl]PF₆ {arene = C₆H₆ ( 1 ), p‐cymene ( 2 ), and C₆Me₆, ( 3 )}, [(η⁶‐C₅Me₅)M( L )Cl]PF₆ {M = Rh ( 4 ), Ir ( 5 )}, and [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 6 ), [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Os(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 7 ), [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 8 ), and [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)( L )]PF₆ ( 9 ) were prepared by a general method and characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The molecular structures of compounds 4 and 5 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In each compound the metal is connected to N1 and N11 in a k² manner.     

Identification of the Structural Determinants for Anticancer Activity of a Ruthenium Arene Peptide Conjugate

Organometallic Ru(arene)–peptide bioconjugates with potent in vitro anticancer activity are rare. We have prepared a conjugate of a Ru(arene) complex with the neuropeptide [Leu⁵]‐enkephalin. [Chlorido(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(5‐oxo‐κO‐2‐{(4‐[(N‐tyrosinyl‐glycinyl‐glycinyl‐phenylalanyl‐leucinyl‐NH₂)propanamido]‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐1‐yl)methyl}‐4H‐pyronato‐κO)ruthenium(II)] ( 8 ) shows antiproliferative activity in human ovarian carcinoma cells with an IC₅₀ value as low as 13 μM , whereas the peptide or the Ru moiety alone are hardly cytotoxic. The conjugation strategy for linking the Ru(cym) (cym=η⁶‐p‐cymene) moiety to the peptide involved N‐terminal modification of an alkyne‐[Leu⁵]‐enkephalin with a 2‐(azidomethyl)‐5‐hydroxy‐4H‐pyran‐4‐one linker, using Cu^I‐catalyzed alkyne–azide cycloaddition (CuAAC), and subsequent metallation with the Ru(cym) moiety. The ruthenium‐bioconjugate was characterized by high resolution top‐down electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS) with regard to peptide sequence, linker modification and metallation site. Notably, complete sequence coverage was obtained and the Ru(cym) moiety was confirmed to be coordinated to the pyronato linker. The ruthenium‐bioconjugate was analyzed with respect to cytotoxicity‐determining constituents, and through the bioconjugate models [{2‐(azidomethyl)‐5‐oxo‐κO‐4H‐pyronato‐κO}chloride (η⁶‐p‐cymene)ruthenium(II)] ( 5 ) and [chlorido(η⁶‐p‐cymene){5‐oxo‐κO‐2‐([(4‐(phenoxymethyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐1‐yl]methyl)‐4H‐pyronato‐κO}ruthenium(II)] ( 6 ) the Ru(cym) fragment with a triazole‐carrying pyronato ligand was identified as the minimal unit required to achieve in vitro anticancer activity.     

Quantitative Monitoring and Visualization of Hydrogen Sulfide In Vivo Using a Luminescent Probe Based on a Ruthenium(II) Complex

Development of novel bioanalytical methods for monitoring of H₂S is key toward understanding the physiological and pathological functions of this gasotransmitter in live organisms. A ruthenium(II)‐complex‐based luminescence probe, Ru‐MDB (MDB: 4’‐methyl‐[2,2’‐bipyridine]‐4‐yl)methyl 2‐((2,4‐dinitrophenyl)thio)benzoate), was developed by introducing a new H₂S responsive masking moiety to a red‐emitting Ru^II luminophore. Cleavage of this masking group by a H₂S‐triggered reaction leads to a luminescence “off–on” response. The long‐lived emissions of Ru‐MDB and its reaction product with H₂S allowed quantitative detection of H₂S in autofluorescence‐rich human sera and adult zebrafish organs using the time‐gated luminescence mode. Ru‐MDB exhibits red emission, a large Stokes shift, high specificity and sensitivity for H₂S detection, and low cytotoxicity, which enables imaging and flow cytometry analysis of lysosomal H₂S generation in live inflamed cells under drug stimulation. Monitoring of H₂S in live Daphnia magna, zebrafish embryos, adult zebrafish, and mice, was conducted by in vivo imaging using Ru‐MDB as a probe.     

Synthesis and properties of carboxy-substituted half-sandwich ruthenium complexes with chelating bisphosphine ligands (η-C5H4CO2H)Ru(η-L)X (X = I, H)

Several Ru(II) complexes (η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂H)Ru(η²-L)I have been prepared by the hydrolysis of the ester linkage in (η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂t-Bu)Ru(η²-L)Cl with trimethylsilyl iodide. The hydrides (η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂H)Ru(η²-L)H may be prepared by reduction of the iodide complexes in KOH/MeOH solutions followed by acidification. Complexes with several chelating bisphosphine ligands have been prepared in this way. The carboxylate anions [(η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂)Ru(η²-L)H]⁻ are readily protonated by weak acids to give the carboxyCp complexes. The pK_a of the carboxy proton of (η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂H)Ru(dppe)H (dppe = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) is 11.3 in DMSO. Protonation of the neutral hydride complex (η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂H)Ru(dppf)H gives the cationic dihydride (η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂H)Ru(dppf)H⁺₂; the dihydride structure has been confirmed by measuring the T₁ of its ¹H NMR hydride resonance over a range of temperatures. The oxidations of the halide complexes (η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂H)Ru(dppf)I and (η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂t-Bu)Ru(dppf)Cl (dppf = 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) have been studied by cyclic voltammetry.