A Zeolite‐Like Zinc Phosphonocarboxylate Framework and Its Transformation into Two‐ and Three‐Dimensional Structures

Three zinc phosphonocarboxylates, Zn₂(pbc)₂?Hdma?H₃O?2H₂O ( 1 ), Zn(pbc)?Hdma ( 2 ), and Zn_4.5(pbc)₃(OH)(H₂O)_0.5?Hdma ( 3 ) (H₃pbc=4‐phosphonobenzoic acid, dma=dimethylamine) were synthesized by the mixed solvothermal reaction of Zn(Ac)₂?2H₂O and 4‐phosphonobenzoic acid in N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) and water. The zigzag and ladderlike chains completely constructed by triply fused 4‐membered rings (denoted SBU‐1) are linked by the organic moieties to form the 3D zeolite‐like structure 1 and the layered structure 2 , respectively. As for structure 3 , a new second building unit (SBU‐2) formed by the inset of the [Zn₃O₁₂] trimer into the 4‐membered ring as well as SBU‐1 is observed. The connections between the two types of SBUs lead to a “zinc phosphate” layer, which is linked by the organic groups to generate a 3D pillar‐layered structure. Both solution‐mediated and solid‐state transformations of 1 to 2 and 3 were observed. A possible mechanism for the transformation is proposed. Gas sorption studies show that 1 has accessible pores for methanol and water and exhibits size selectivity for alcohols.     

Homo‐ and Heterovalent Polynuclear Cerium and Cerium/Manganese Aggregates

Reactions of Ce^III(NO₃)₃?6 H₂O or (NH₄)₂[Ce^IV(NO₃)₆] with Mn‐containing starting materials result in seven novel polynuclear Ce or Ce/Mn complexes with pivalato (^tBuCO ) and, in most cases, auxiliary N,O‐ or N,O,O‐donor ligands. With nuclearities ranging from 6–14, the compounds present aesthetically pleasing structures. Complexes [Ce^IV₆(μ₃‐O)₄(μ₃‐OH)₄(μ‐O₂C^tBu)₁₂] ( 1 ), [Ce^IV₆Mn^III₄(μ₄‐O)₄(μ₃‐O)₄(O₂C^tBu)₁₂(ea)₄(OAc)₄]?4 H₂O?4 MeCN (ea^?=2‐aminoethanolato; 2 ), [Ce^IV₆Mn^III₈(μ₄‐O)₄(μ₃‐O)₈(pye)₄(O₂C^tBu)₁₈]₂[Ce^IV₆(μ₃‐O)₄(μ₃‐OH)₄(O₂C^tBu)₁₀(NO₃)₄] [Ce^III(NO₃)₅(H₂O)]?21 MeCN (pye^?=pyridine‐2‐ethanolato; 3 ), and [Ce^IV₆Ce^III₂Mn^III₂(μ₄‐O)₄(μ₃‐O)₄(^tbdea)₂(O₂C^tBu)₁₂(NO₃)₂(OAc)₂]?4 CH₂Cl₂ (^tbdea^2?=2,2′‐(tert‐butylimino]bis[ethanolato]; 4 ) all contain structures based on an octahedral {Ce^IV₆(μ₃‐O)₈} core, in which many of the O‐atoms are either protonated to give (μ₃‐OH)^? hydroxo ligands or coordinate to further metal centers (Mn^III or Ce^III) to give interstitial (μ₄‐O)^2? oxo bridges. The decanuclear complex [Ce^IV₈Ce^IIIMn^III(μ₄‐O)₃(μ₃‐O)₃(μ₃‐OH)₂(μ‐OH)(bdea)₄(O₂C^tBu)_9.5(NO₃)_3.5(OAc)₂]?1.5 MeCN (bdea^2?=2,2′‐(butylimino]bis[ethanolato]; 5 ) contains a rather compact Ce^IV₇ core with the Ce^III and Mn^III centers well‐separated from each other on the periphery. The aggregate in [Ce^IV₄Mn^IV₂(μ₃‐O)₄(bdea)₂(O₂C^tBu)₁₀(NO₃)₂]?4 MeCN ( 6 ) is based on a quasi‐planar {Mn^IV₂Ce^IV₄(μ₃‐O)₄} core made up of four edge‐sharing {Mn^IVCe^IV₂(μ₃‐O)} or {Ce^IV₃(μ₃‐O)} triangles. The structure of [Ce^IV₃Mn^IV₄Mn^III(μ₄‐O)₂(μ₃‐O)₇(O₂C^tBu)₁₂(NO₃)(furan)]?6 H₂O ( 7 ?6 H₂O) can be considered as {Mn^IV₂Ce^IV₂O₄} and distorted {Mn^IV₂Mn^IIICe^IVO₄} cubane units linked through a central (μ₄‐O) bridge. The Ce₆Mn₈ equals the highest nuclearity yet reported for a heterometallic Ce/Mn aggregate. In contrast to most of the previously reported heterometallic Ce/Mn systems, which contain only Ce^IV and either Mn^IV or Mn^III, some of the aggregates presented here show mixed valency, either Mn^IV/Mn^III (see 7 ) or Ce^IV/Ce^III (see 4 and 5 ). Interestingly, some of the compounds, including the heterovalent Ce^IV/Ce^III 4 , could be obtained from either Ce^III(NO₃)₃?6 H₂O or (NH₄)₂[Ce^IV(NO₃)₆] as starting material.     

Trapping Aluminum Hydroxide Clusters with Trisilanols during Speciation in Aluminum(III)–Water Systems: Reproducible,Large Scale Access to Molecular Aluminate Models

To gain molecular level insights into the properties of certain functions and units of extended oxides/hydroxides, suitable molecular model compounds are needed. As an attractive route to access such compounds the trapping of early intermediates during the hydrolysis of suitable precursor compounds with the aid of stabilizing ligands is conceivable, which was tested for the aluminum(III)/water system. Indeed, trisilanols proved suitable trapping reagents: their presence during the hydrolysis of AlⁱBu₂H in dependence on the amount of water used allowed for the isolation of tri‐ and octanuclear aluminum hydroxide cluster complexes [Al₃(μ₂‐OH)₃(THF)₃(PhSi(OSiPh₂O)₃)₂] ( 1 ) and [Al₈(μ₃‐OH)₂(μ₂‐OH)₁₀(THF)₃(p‐anisylSi(OSiPh₂O)₃)₄] ( 2 ). 1 can be regarded as the Al(OH)₃ cyclic trimer, where six protons have been replaced by silyl residues. While 2 features a unique [Al₈(μ₃‐OH)₂(μ₂‐OH)₁₀]¹²⁺ core. In contrast to most other known aggregates of this type, 1 and 2 can be readily prepared at reasonable scales, dissolve in common solvents, and retain an intact framework even in the presence of excessive amounts of water. This finding paves the way to future research addressing the reactivity of the individual functional groups.     

Trapping Aluminum Hydroxide Clusters with Trisilanols during Speciation in Aluminum(III)–Water Systems: Reproducible,Large Scale Access to Molecular Aluminate Models

To gain molecular level insights into the properties of certain functions and units of extended oxides/hydroxides, suitable molecular model compounds are needed. As an attractive route to access such compounds the trapping of early intermediates during the hydrolysis of suitable precursor compounds with the aid of stabilizing ligands is conceivable, which was tested for the aluminum(III)/water system. Indeed, trisilanols proved suitable trapping reagents: their presence during the hydrolysis of AlⁱBu₂H in dependence on the amount of water used allowed for the isolation of tri‐ and octanuclear aluminum hydroxide cluster complexes [Al₃(μ₂‐OH)₃(THF)₃(PhSi(OSiPh₂O)₃)₂] ( 1 ) and [Al₈(μ₃‐OH)₂(μ₂‐OH)₁₀(THF)₃(p‐anisylSi(OSiPh₂O)₃)₄] ( 2 ). 1 can be regarded as the Al(OH)₃ cyclic trimer, where six protons have been replaced by silyl residues. While 2 features a unique [Al₈(μ₃‐OH)₂(μ₂‐OH)₁₀]¹²⁺ core. In contrast to most other known aggregates of this type, 1 and 2 can be readily prepared at reasonable scales, dissolve in common solvents, and retain an intact framework even in the presence of excessive amounts of water. This finding paves the way to future research addressing the reactivity of the individual functional groups.     

Mechanistic Insight into Peroxo‐Shunt Formation of Biomimetic Models for Compound II,Their Reactivity toward Organic Substrates,and the Influence of N‐Methylimidazole Axial Ligation

High‐valent iron‐oxo species have been invoked as reactive intermediates in catalytic cycles of heme and nonheme enzymes. The studies presented herein are devoted to the formation of compound II model complexes, with the application of a water soluble (TMPS)Fe^III(OH) porphyrin ([meso‐tetrakis(2,4,6‐trimethyl‐3‐sulfonatophenyl)porphinato]iron(III) hydroxide) and hydrogen peroxide as oxidant, and their reactivity toward selected organic substrates. The kinetics of the reaction of H₂O₂ with (TMPS)Fe^III(OH) was studied as a function of temperature and pressure. The negative values of the activation entropy and activation volume for the formation of (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(OH) point to the overall associative nature of the process. A pH‐dependence study on the formation of (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(OH) revealed a very high reactivity of OOH^? toward (TMPS)Fe^III(OH) in comparison to H₂O₂. The influence of N‐methylimidazole (N‐MeIm) ligation on both the formation of iron(IV)‐oxo species and their oxidising properties in the reactions with 4‐methoxybenzyl alcohol or 4‐methoxybenzaldehyde, was investigated in detail. Combined experimental and theoretical studies revealed that among the studied complexes, (TMPS)Fe^III(H₂O)(N‐MeIm) is highly reactive toward H₂O₂ to form the iron(IV)‐oxo species, (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(N‐MeIm). The latter species can also be formed in the reaction of (TMPS)Fe^III(N‐MeIm)₂ with H₂O₂ or in the direct reaction of (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(OH) with N‐MeIm. Interestingly, the kinetic studies involving substrate oxidation by (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(OH) and (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(N‐MeIm) do not display a pronounced effect of the N‐MeIm axial ligand on the reactivity of the compound II mimic in comparison to the OH^? substituted analogue. Similarly, DFT computations revealed that the presence of an axial ligand (OH^? or N‐MeIm) in the trans position to the oxo group in the iron(IV)‐oxo species does not significantly affect the activation barriers calculated for C?H dehydrogenation of the selected organic substrates.     

Cyaarside (CAs−) and 1,3‐Diarsaallendiide (AsCAs2−) Ligands Coordinated to Uranium and Generated via Activation of the Arsaethynolate Ligand (OCAs−)

Reaction of the trivalent uranium complex [((^Ad,MeArO)₃N)U(DME)] with one molar equiv [Na(OCAs)(dioxane)₃], in the presence of 2.2.2‐crypt, yields [Na(2.2.2‐crypt)][{((^Ad,MeArO)₃N)U^IV(THF)}(μ‐O){((^Ad,MeArO)₃N)U^IV(CAs)}] ( 1 ), the first example of a coordinated η¹‐cyaarside ligand (CAs^?). Formation of the terminal CAs^? is promoted by the highly reducing, oxophilic U^III precursor [((^Ad,MeArO)₃N)U(DME)] and proceeds through reductive C?O bond cleavage of the bound arsaethynolate anion, OCAs^?. If two equiv of OCAs^? react with the U^III precursor, the binuclear, μ‐oxo‐bridged U₂^IV/IV complex [Na(2.2.2‐crypt)]₂[{((^Ad,MeArO)₃N)U^IV}₂(μ‐O)(μ‐AsCAs)] ( 2 ), comprising the hitherto unknown μ:η¹,η¹‐coordinated (AsCAs)^2? ligand, is isolated. The mechanistic pathway to 2 involves the decarbonylation of a dimeric intermediate formed in the reaction of 1 with OCAs^?. An alternative pathway to complex 2 is by conversion of 1 via addition of one further equiv of OCAs^?.     

Rearrangements in Model Peptide‐Type Radicals via Intramolecular Hydrogen‐Atom Transfer

Intramolecular H‐atom transfer in model peptide‐type radicals was investigated with high‐level quantum‐chemistry calculations. Examination of 1,2‐, 1,3‐, 1,5‐, and 1,6[C ? N]‐H shifts, 1,4‐ and 1,7[C ? C]‐H shifts, and 1,4[N ? N]‐H shifts (Scheme 1), was carried out with a number of theoretical methods. In the first place, the performance of UB3‐LYP (with the 6‐31G(d), 6‐31G(2df,p), and 6‐311+G(d,p) basis sets) and UMP2 (with the 6‐31G(d) basis set) was assessed for the determination of radical geometries. We found that there is only a small basis‐set dependence for the UB3‐LYP structures, and geometries optimized with UB3‐LYP/6‐31G(d) are generally sufficient for use in conjunction with high‐level composite methods in the determination of improved H‐transfer thermochemistry. Methods assessed in this regard include the high‐level composite methods, G3(MP2)‐RAD, CBS‐QB3, and G3//B3‐LYP, as well as the density‐functional methods B3‐LYP, MPWB1K, and BMK in association with the 6‐31+G(d,p) and 6‐311++G(3df,3pd) basis sets. The high‐level methods give results that are close to one another, while the recently developed functionals MPWB1K and BMK provide cost‐effective alternatives. For the systems considered, the transformation of an N‐centered radical to a C‐centered radical is always exothermic (by 25 kJ ? mol^?1 or more), and this can lead to quite modest barrier heights of less than 60 kJ ? mol^?1 (specifically for 1,5[C ? N]‐H and 1,6[C ? N]‐H shifts). H‐Migration barriers appear to decrease as the ring size in the transition structure (TS) increases, with a lowering of the barrier being found, for example when moving from a rearrangement proceeding via a four‐membered‐ring TS (e.g., the 1,3[C ? N]‐H shift, CH₃? C(O)? NH^. → ^.CH₂? C(O)? NH₂) to a rearrangement proceeding via a six‐membered‐ring TS (e.g., the 1,5[C ? N]‐H shift, ^.NH? CH₂? C(O)? NH? CH₃ → NH₂? CH₂? C(O)? NH? CH₂^.).     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of a Tetranuclear Cerium(IV) Oxo Cluster Supported by the Kläui Tripodal Ligand [Co(η5‐C5H5){P(O)(OEt)2}3]−

A tetranuclear Ce^IV oxo cluster compound containing the Kläui tripodal ligand [Co(η⁵‐C₅H₅){P(O)(OEt)₂}₃]^? (L_OEt^?) has been synthesized and its reactions with H₂O₂, CO₂, NO, and Brønsted acids have been studied. The treatment of [Ce(L_OEt)(NO₃)₃] with Et₄NOH in acetonitrile afforded the tetranuclear Ce^IV oxo cluster [Ce₄(L_OEt)₄O₇H₂] ( 1 ) containing an adamantane‐like {Ce₄(μ₂‐O)₆} core with a μ₄‐oxo ligand at the center. The reaction of 1 with H₂O₂ resulted in the formation of the peroxo cluster [Ce₄(L_OEt)₄(μ₄‐O)(μ₂‐O₂)₄(μ₂‐OH)₂] ( 2 ). The treatment of 1 with CO₂ and NO led to isolation of [Ce(L_OEt)₂(CO₃)] and [Ce(L_OEt)(NO₃)₃], respectively. The protonation of 1 with HCl, ROH (R=2,4,6‐trichlorophenyl), and Ph₃SiOH yielded [Ce(L_OEt)Cl₃] ( 3 ), [Ce(L_OEt)(OR)₃] ( 4 ), and [Ce(L_OEt)(OSiPh₃)₃] ( 5 ), respectively. The chloride ligands in 3 are labile and can be abstracted by silver(I) salts. The treatment of 3 with AgOTs (OTs^?=tosylate) and Ag₂O afforded [Ce(L_OEt)(OTs)₃] ( 6 ) and 1 , respectively. The electrochemistry of the Ce‐L_OEt complexes has been studied by using cyclic voltammetry. The crystal structures of complexes 1 – 5 have been determined.     

Germanates of 1D Chains, 2D Layers,and 3D Frameworks Built from Ge–O Clusters by Using Metal‐Complex Templates: Host–Guest Symmetry and Chirality Transfer

The self‐assembly of Ge–O polyhedra by metal‐complex templates leads to initial examples of open germanate structures under mild solvothermal conditions. These materials are constructed from Ge–O cluster building bocks (Ge₇X₁₉ (X=O, OH, or F) or Ni@Ge₁₄O₂₄(OH)₃) and span the full range of dimensionalities from 1D chains of Ge₇O₁₃(OH)₂F₃?Cl?2[Ni(dien)₂] (FJ‐ 6 ) to 2D layers of Ge₇O₁₄F₃?0.5[In(dien)₂]?0.5H₃dien? 2H₂O ( 1 ) and 3D frameworks of Ni@ Ge₁₄O₂₄(OH)₃?2[Ni(L)₃] (FJ‐ 1 a /FJ‐ 1 b ) (dien=diethylenetriamine, L=ethylenediamine (en) or 1,2‐diaminopropane (enMe)). The Ge₇X₁₉ cluster in FJ‐ 6 and 1 is formed by condensation of four GeX₄ tetrahedra, two GeX₅ trigonal bipyramids, and one GeX₆ octahedron with a μ₃‐O atom at the center of the cluster, whereas the Ni@ Ge₁₄O₂₄(OH)₃ cluster in FJ‐ 1 a /FJ‐ 1 b is formed by condensation of nine peripheral GeO₄ tetrahedra and five interior GeO₃Ni units with one μ₅‐Ni atom at the center of the cluster. FJ‐ 6 is characterized by a pair of racemic Ge₇O₁₄(OH)₂F₃ cluster chains and represents only one example of 1D germanates; 1 exhibits unique germanate layers with uniform 10‐membered‐ring apertures encapsulating an unknown indium complex, and the framework structure of FJ‐ 1 a /FJ‐ 1 b with large 24‐membered‐ring channels is the first example of porous materials that contain metal–metal bonds (Ge²⁺? Ni⁺). These initial examples of germanates from metal‐complex templates provide a useful model system for understanding the mechanisms of host–guest interactions, which may further facilitate the design and development of new porous materials “on demand”. It is shown that the symmetry and configuration of the guest metal complex can be imprinted onto the host inorganic framework through hydrogen bonding between host and guest.     

1‐Hydroxy‐1H‐benzo[d][1,2,6]oxazaborinin‐4(3H)‐one

The structure of the title compound, C₇H₆BNO₃, a new boron heterocycle, prepared by the condensation of (2‐ethoxycarbonylphenyl)boronic acid and hydroxylamine, reveals the specific mode of intramolecular condensation between a phenylboronic acid and an ortho hydroxamic acid substituent. The crystal structure shows that dehydration occurs to form a planar oxazaborinine ring possessing both phenol‐like B—O—H and lactam functional groups. In the extended structure, intermolecular hydrogen bonding generates a 14‐membered ring. To our knowledge, this is the first crystal structure determination involving a six‐membered ring that exhibits consecutive B—OH, O, NH, and C=O functional groups.     

Methods of preparation of novel composites of poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) and a modified Mg/Al hydrotalcite

12‐Hydroxydodecanoate (HD) anions were intercalated, via an ion‐exchange procedure, onto a Mg/Al hydrotalcite‐like compound with the formula [Mg_0.65Al_0.35(OH)₂](NO₃)_0.35·0.56H₂O. The obtained intercalate, characterized by chemical and thermal analyses, X‐ray powder diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, had the formula [Mg_0.65Al_0.35(OH)₂](NO₃)_0.08(HD)_0.28·0.56H₂O and an interlayer distance of 2.27 nm. Structural considerations indicated that the charge‐balancing HO? (CH₂)₁₁? COO^? anions were accommodated in the interlayer region as a monofilm of partially interdigitated alkyl chains in a trans planar conformation and bearing the alcoholic group. The organically modified hydrotalcite was used to prepare novel composites based on poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) with different procedures: (1) solvent casting, (2) ring‐opening polymerization of ?‐caprolactone, and (3) blending of precursors consisting of a PCL intercalated oligomer with a high‐molecular‐weight PCL. Microcomposites were obtained by the solvent casting of a mixture of a high‐molecular‐weight PCL and the modified hydrotalcite. The ring‐opening polymerization of ?‐caprolactone initiated by the ? OH groups of the alkyl chains intercalated in the hydrotalcite led to hybrid materials in which a low‐molecular‐weight PCL was in part intercalated into the modified hydrotalcite. Nanocomposites containing exfoliated hydrotalcite were obtained through the mixing, in different weight ratios, of hybrids consisting of PCL oligomers and modified hydrotalcite with a commercial high‐molecular‐weight PCL. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 2281–2290, 2005     

Structure and Photocatalytic Property of a Cobalt(II) Compound Containing Pentanuclear [Co5(mtpo)2(μ3‐OH)2(μ2‐OH)2(COO)3] Clusters as Building Subunits

The cobalt(II) compound [Co₅(mtpo)₂(pdc)₃(μ₃‐OH)₂(μ₂‐OH)₂(H₂O)₂]_n ( 1 ) (mtpo = 7‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐1,3,4‐triazaindolizine, H₂pdc = terephthalic acid) was synthesized by hydrothermal reaction of Co(NO₃)₂, mtpo, and H₂pdc. X‐ray structural analysis shows that compound 1 features a 3D framework containing pentanuclear [Co₅(mtpo)₂(μ₃‐OH)₂(μ₂‐OH)₂(COO)₃] clusters as building subunits. Topological analysis reveals that compound 1 can be simplified into a 6‐connected pcu topological network. Notably, this compound can be used as visible‐light‐driven photocatalyst for photodegradation of MB.     

Multi‐Pyrene Assemblies Supported on Stannoxane Frameworks: Synthesis,Structure and Photophysical Studies

Organostannoxanes have been used as scaffolds for the preparation of multi‐chromophore assemblies. A single‐step synthesis procedure allows the preparation of compounds in which the number of chromophore units can be varied from two to six. Thus, the reactions of pyrene sulfonic acid (PySO₃H) or C₁₆H₉CHNC₆H₃(COOH)₂ (LH₂) with various organotin precursors gave pyrene‐containing organostannoxanes, that is, [Ph₃SnPySO₃]₆ ( 1 ), [{(Me₂Sn)₂(μ₃‐O)(μ‐OH)PySO₃}₂{(Me₂Sn)₂(μ₃‐O)(μ‐OH)H₂O}₂ ? 2 PySO₃] ( 2 ), [{tBu₂Sn(OH)PySO₃}₂] ( 3 ), [{(nBuSn)₁₂(O)₁₄(OH)₆{PySO₃}₂] ( 4 ), and [{(nBu₂Sn)L}₃]₂ ? C₆H₅CH₃ ( 5 ). Compounds 1 – 5 were characterized by using X‐ray crystallography. Compounds 1 and 5 are 24‐membered macrocycles. Macrocycle 1 possesses intramolecular π–π stacking interactions. An unusual co‐crystal of two tetrameric ladders in 2 was observed in which one of the components of the co‐crystal is neutral whereas the other is dicationic and two pyrenesulfonate counterions are present to balance the overall charge. In the solid state these compounds reveal rich supramolecular structures. Photophysical studies on 1 – 5 reveal that interactions in the solid state lead to considerable broadening of the emission bands.     

Mechanistic Studies on the Oxidation of Glyoxylic and Pyruvic Acid by a [Mn4O6]4+ Core in Aqueous Media: Kinetics of Oxo‐Bridge Protonation

In aqueous media (pH 2.5–6.0), the Mn^IV tetramer [Mn₄(μ‐O)₆(bipy)₆]⁴⁺ ( 1 ⁴⁺; bipy = 2,2′‐bipyridine) oxidizes both glyoxylic and pyruvic acid to formic and acetic acid, respectively, under formation of CO₂. Kinetics studies suggest that the species 1 ⁴⁺, its oxo‐bridge protonated form [ 1 H]⁵⁺, i.e., [Mn₄(μ‐O)₅(μ‐OH)(bipy)₆]⁵⁺, the reducing acids (RH) and their conjugate bases (R^?) all take part in the reaction. The oxo‐bridge protonated oxidant [ 1 H]⁵⁺ was found to react much faster than 1 ⁴⁺. Thereby, the gem‐diol forms of the α‐oxo acids (especially in the case of glyoxylic acid) are the possible reductants. A one‐electron/one‐proton electroprotic mechanism operates in the rate‐determining step.     

Syntheses,Structures, Electrochemistry,and Electrocatalysis of Three Copper(II) Coordination Polymers constructed from 5‐[4‐(1H‐Imidazol‐1‐yl)phenyl]‐1H‐tetrazole

Three coordination polymers (CPs) based on the 5‐[4‐(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)phenyl]‐1H‐tetrazole ( HL ) ligand, namely, [Cu(μ₂‐ L )(μ₄‐pbda)(H₂O)] ( 1 ), [Cu₂(μ‐Hbtc)(H₂btc)(μ₃‐OH)(μ₄‐ HL )] ( 2 ) and [Cu₅(μ₃‐ L )(μ₄‐ L )(μ₃‐ip)(μ₃‐OH)(H₂O)₂] · 2H₂O ( 3 ) (H₂pbda = 1,4‐benzenedicarboxylic acid, H₃btc = 1,3,5‐benzenetricarboxylic acid, H₂ip = isophthalic acid) were hydrothermally synthesized and structurally characterized. Complex 1 represents “weave”‐type 2D layers consisting of wave‐like 1D chains and 1D straight chains, which are further connected by hydrogen bonds to form a 3D supramolecular structure. Complex 2 exhibits a uninodal (4)‐connected 2D layer with a point symbol of {4⁴ · 6²}, in which the L ligand can be described as μ₅‐bridging and the H₂btc^– ions display multiple kinds of coordination modes to connect Cu^II ions into 1D “H”‐type Cu‐H₂btc chains. In complex 3 , 2D Cu‐ L layers with two kinds of grids and 1D “stair”‐type Cu‐ip chains link each other to construct a 3D {4¹² · 6³} framework, which contains the pentanuclear subunits. Deprotonated degree and coordination modes of carboxylate ligands may consequentially influence the coordination patterns of main ligands and the final structures of complexes 1 – 3 . Furthermore, electrochemical behaviors and electrocatalytic activities of the title complexes were analyzed at room temperature, suggesting practical applications in areas of electrocatalytic reduction toward nitrite and hydrogen dioxide in aqueous solutions, respectively.     

C 5 and C7 intramolecular hydrogen bonds stabilize the structure of N‐pyrazinoyl‐gabapentin (Pyr‐Gpn‐OH)

2‐{1‐[(Pyrazin‐2‐ylformamido)methyl]cyclohexyl}acetic acid (Pyr‐Gpn‐OH), C₁₄H₁₉N₃O₃, is an N‐protected derivative of gabapentin (Gpn). The compound crystallizes in the triclinic space group P and the molecular conformation is stabilized by intramolecular five‐ (C₅) and seven‐membered (C₇) hydrogen‐bonded rings. The packing of the molecules reveals intermolecular O—H...O and C—H...N hydrogen bonds, together with π–π interactions.     

Hydrolyseprodukte von Hexabromoosmat(IV), OsBr62−

Hydrolysis Products of Hexabromoosmate (IV), OsBr₆^2? As a result of the acidic hydrolysis of hexabromoosmate(IV), OsBr₆^2?, products were obtained which were separated by ion column chromatography using diethylaminoethylcellulose. On the basis of the analytically determined Os: Br ratios, the ionic charges that could be deduced from the elution behaviour, and the absorption spectra the products have been characterized as OsBr₅(H₂O)^?, Br₄(H₂O)Os? ;OH? ;Os(H₂O)Br₄^?, Br₃(H₂O)₂Os? ;OH? ;Os(OH)(H₂O)Br₃, Br₂(H₂O)₂(OH)Os? ;OH? ;Os(OH)(H₂O)₂Br₂⁺ and OsBr(OH)_m(H₂O) (0 ? m ? 2). In the dimers intramolecular formation of hydrogen bonds is assumed.     

7‐Phenyl‐1‐oxa‐4‐thiaspiro[4.5]decan‐7‐ol stereoisomers

The stereoisomers of 7‐phenyl‐1‐oxa‐4‐thia­spiro­[4.5]­decan‐7‐ol, C₁₄H₁₈O₂S, have the same stereochemistry at the C atom bearing an OH group, i.e. axial OH and equatorial phenyl groups. However, the acetal S and O atoms are axial and equatorial, respectively, in one isomer and reversed in the second. Furthermore, the crystals of one isomer are composed of hydrogen‐bonded mol­ecules involving the hydroxyl H atom and the O atom of the five‐membered heterocyclic ring, with an O?O distance of 2.962 (3) Å, forming a polymeric chain along the b axis. The asymmetric unit of the other isomer is composed of two mol­ecules, wherein hydroxyl H atoms and the O atoms of the five‐membered heterocyclic rings display intramolecular O—H?O hydrogen bonds with O?O separations of 2.820 (2) and 2.834 (2) Å.     

A Flexible Photoactive Titanium Metal–Organic Framework Based on a [TiIV3(μ3‐O)(O)2(COO)6] Cluster

The synthesis of titanium–carboxylate metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) is hampered by the high reactivity of the commonly employed alkoxide precursors. Herein, we present an innovative approach to titanium‐based MOFs by the use of titanocene dichloride to synthesize COK‐69, the first breathing Ti MOF, which is built up from trans‐1,4‐cyclohexanedicarboxylate linkers and an unprecedented [Ti^IV₃(μ₃‐O)(O)₂(COO)₆] cluster. The photoactive properties of COK‐69 were investigated in depth by proton‐coupled electron‐transfer experiments, which revealed that up to one Ti^IV center per cluster can be photoreduced to Ti^III while preserving the structural integrity of the framework. The electronic structure of COK‐69 was determined by molecular modeling, and a band gap of 3.77 eV was found.     

(Ni3–xMgx)[B3P3O12(OH)6] · 6 H2O (x ≈ 1.5): A Novel BorophosphateHydrate Containing Isolated Six‐Membered Rings of Tetrahedra

A novel borophosphate‐hydrate, (Ni_3–xMg_x)[B₃P₃O₁₂(OH)₆] · 6 H₂O (x ≈ 1.5), has been prepared by hydrothermal synthesis (T = 170 °C) from a mixture of NiCl₂ · 6 H₂O, Mg(OH)₂, B₂O₃ and H₃PO₄. The crystal structure was determined at 293 K from single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data (trigonal, R3c (no. 167), a = 14.957(10) Å, c = 13.812(6) Å, V = 2676(2) ų, Z = 6, R₁ = 0.0276, wR₂ = 0.0714 for 779 observed reflections with I > 2σ(I)). The crystal structure contains unbranched six‐membered rings [B₃P₃O₁₂(OH)₆]^6– of alternating corner linked borate and phosphate tetrahedra, which are stacked along [001] and connected via M^IIO₂(OH)₂(H₂O)₂ coordination polyhedra. Hydrogen bonding between the tetrahedral six‐membered rings and M^IIO₂(OH)₂(H₂O)₂ octahedra leads to a further cross‐linking. With respect to the arrangement of isolated six‐membered tetrahedral rings the crystal structure of this borophosphate‐hydrate is closely related to the cyclo‐hexasilicate dioptase, Cu₆[Si₆O₁₈] · 6 H₂O.