Hydroxo‐bridged Tetranuclear CuII Complexes: {[Cu(bpy)(OH)]4Cl2}Cl2 · 6 H2O and {[Cu(phen)(OH)]4(H2O)2}]Cl4 · 4 H2O

The blue tetranuclear Cu^II complexes {[Cu(bpy)(OH)]₄Cl₂}Cl₂ · 6 H₂O ( 1 ) and {[Cu(phen)(OH)]₄(H₂O)₂}Cl₄ · 4 H₂O ( 2 ) were synthesized and characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. ( 1 ): P 1 (no. 2), a = 9.240(1) Å, b = 10.366(2) Å, c = 12.973(2) Å, α = 85.76(1)°, β = 75.94(1)°, γ = 72.94(1)°, V = 1152.2(4) ų, Z = 1; ( 2 ): P 1 (no. 2), a = 9.770(3) Å, b = 10.118(3) Å, c = 14.258(4) Å, α = 83.72(2)°, β = 70.31(1)°, γ = 70.63(1)°, V = 1252.0(9) ų, Z = 1. The building units are centrosymmetric tetranuclear {[Cu(bpy)(OH)]₄Cl₂}²⁺ and {[Cu(phen)(OH)]₄(H₂O)₂}⁴⁺ complex cations formed by condensation of four elongated square pyramids CuN₂(OH)₂L^ap with the apical ligands L^ap = Cl, H₂O, OH. The resulting [Cu₄(μ₂‐OH)₂(μ₃‐OH)₂] core has the shape of a zigzag band of three Cu₂(OH)₂ squares. The cations exhibit intramolecular and intermolecular π‐π stacking interactions and the latter form 2D layers with the non‐bonded Cl^– anions and H₂O molecules in between (bond lengths: Cu–N = 1.995–2.038 Å; Cu–O = 1.927–1.982 Å; Cu–Cl^ap = 2.563; Cu–O^ap(OH) = 2.334–2.369 Å; Cu–O^ap(H₂O) = 2.256 Å). The Cu…Cu distances of about 2.93 Å do not indicate direct interactions, but the strongly reduced magnetic moment of about 2.74 B.M. corresponds with only two unpaired electrons per formula unit of 1 (1.37 B.M./Cu) and obviously results from intramolecular spin couplings (χ_m(T‐θ) = 0.933 cm³ · mol^–1 · K with θ = –0.7 K).     

Three AgI,CuI and CdII coordination polymers based on the new asymmetrical ligand 2‐{4‐[(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)methyl]phenyl}‐5‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole: syntheses,characterization and emission properties

The new asymmetrical organic ligand 2‐{4‐[(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)methyl]phenyl}‐5‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole ( L , C₁₇H₁₃N₅O), containing pyridine and imidazole terminal groups, as well as potential oxdiazole coordination sites, was designed and synthesized. The coordination chemistry of L with soft Ag^I, Cu^I and Cd^II metal ions was investigated and three new coordination polymers (CPs), namely, catena‐poly[[silver(I)‐μ‐2‐{4‐[(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)methyl]phenyl}‐5‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole] hexafluoridophosphate], {[Ag( L )]PF₆}_n, catena‐poly[[copper(I)‐di‐μ‐iodido‐copper(I)‐bis(μ‐2‐{4‐[(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)methyl]phenyl}‐5‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole)] 1,4‐dioxane monosolvate], {[Cu₂I₂( L )₂]·C₄H₈O₂}_n, and catena‐poly[[[dinitratocopper(II)]‐bis(μ‐2‐{4‐[(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)methyl]phenyl}‐5‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole)]–methanol–water (1/1/0.65)], {[Cd( L )₂(NO₃)₂]·2CH₄O·0.65H₂O}_n, were obtained. The experimental results show that ligand L coordinates easily with linear Ag^I, tetrahedral Cu^I and octahedral Cd^II metal atoms to form one‐dimensional polymeric structures. The intermediate oxadiazole ring does not participate in the coordination interactions with the metal ions. In all three CPs, weak π–π interactions between the nearly coplanar pyridine, oxadiazole and benzene rings play an important role in the packing of the polymeric chains.     

Unidimensional Self‐assembling of {HgII[NNN(PhBr)2]2} through Metal‐η4‐arene π‐Interactions: Synthesis and X‐Ray Characterization of a Bis Diaryl Symmetric‐substituted Triazenide Complex Polymer of Mercury(II)

A solution of deprotonated 1,3‐bis(4‐bromophenyl)triazene reacts with Hg(CH₃COO)₂ in methanol / tetrahydrofurane to give yellow crystalline needles of {Hg^II[NNN(PhBr)₂]₂}_n, a triazenide complex polymer of Hg^II with metal‐η²,η²‐arene π‐interactions, performed by coordinated single triazenide chains. The crystal structure of the new polymeric complex of Hg^II belongs to the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. The lattice of [Hg^II(BrPhNNNPhBr)₂]_n can be viewed as a one‐dimensional assembling of planar tectons [Hg^II(BrPhNNNPhBr)₂] linked through metalocene alike Hg^II‐η²,η²‐arene π‐interactions along the crystallographic b axis.     

Assembly of Three 2D Metal‐Organic Frameworks (MOFs) Derived from Flexible Ligands, 1,4‐bis(3‐pyridyl)‐2,3‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene (3‐bpd) and/or 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane (dpe)

Three coordination polymers, {[Cd(3‐bpd)₂(NCS)₂]×C₂H₅OH}_n ( 1 ), {[Cd(3‐bpd)(dpe)(NO₃)₂]×(3‐bpd)}₂ ( 2 ), {[Cd(dpe)₂(NCS)₂]×3‐bpd×2H₂O}_n ( 3 ) (3‐bpd = 1,4‐bis(3‐pyridyl)‐2,3‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene; dpe = 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane), were prepared and structurally characterized by a single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction method. In compound 1 , each Cd(II) ion is six‐coordinate bonded to six nitrogen atoms from four 3‐bpd and two NCS^? ligands. The 3‐bpd acts as a bridging ligand connecting the Cd(II) ion to generate a 2D layered metal‐organic framework (MOF) by using a rhomboidal‐grid as the basic building units with the 4⁴ topology. In compound 2 , the Cd(II) ion is also six‐coordinate bonded to four nitrogen atoms of two 3‐bpd, two dpe and two oxygen atoms of two NO₃^? ligands. The 3‐bpd and dpe ligands both adopt bis‐monodentate coordination mode connecting the Cd(II) ions to generate a 2D layered MOF by using a rectangle‐grid as the basic building units with the 4⁴ topology. In compound 3 , two crystallographically independent Cd(II) ions are both coordinated by four nitrogen atoms of dpe ligands in the basal plane and two nitrogen atom of NCS^? in the axial sites. The dpe acts as a bridging ligand to connect the Cd(II) ions forming a 2D interpenetrating MOFs by using a square‐grid as the basic unit with the 4⁴ topology. All of their 2D layered MOFs in compounds 1 ‐ 3 are then arranged in a parallel non‐interpenetrating ABAB—packing manner in 1 and 2 , and mutually interpenetrating manner in 3 , respectively, to extend their 3D supramolecular architectures with their 1D pores intercalated with solvent (ethanol in 1 or H₂O in 3 ) or free 3‐bpd molecules in 2 and 3 , respectively. The photoluminescence measurements of 1 ‐ 3 reveal that the emission is tentatively assigned to originate from π‐π* transition for 1 and 2 and probably due to ligand‐center luminescence for compounds 3 , respectively.     

The structures of MOFs prepared from 1,3,5‐tris [4‐pyridylethynyl]‐benzene and a copper(I) perchlorate complex

Two copper(I)‐based frameworks of complexes {[Cu(L)₂(ClO₄)]?CH₃CN}( 2 ) and {[Cu(L)(ClO₄)]? 2CH₃CN} ( 3 ) (L = 1,3,5‐tris(4‐pyridylethynyl) benzene) were produced by reacting [Cu(MeCN)₄(ClO₄)] with different amounts of a ligand (L) using a hydrothermal method at temperatures of up to 130°C. The nitrogen atoms in the pyridine moieties of the ligand coordinate to the Cu(I) ion. The charge on the Cu(I) ion can be stabilized by extending the degree of conjugation in the system and by taking advantage of its highly symmetrical structure. The large degree of conjugation also supports numerous π–π interactions in the framework.     

Selective Sensing of Phosphates by a New Bis‐heteroleptic RuII Complex through Halogen Bonding: A Superior Sensor over Its Hydrogen‐Bonding Analogue

The selective phosphate‐sensing property of a bis‐heteroleptic Ru^II complex, 1 [PF₆]₂, which has a halogen‐bonding iodotriazole unit, is demonstrated and is shown to be superior to its hydrogen‐bonding analogue, 2 [PF₆]₂. Complex 1 [PF₆]₂, exploiting halogen‐bonding interactions, shows enhanced phosphate recognition in both acetonitrile and aqueous acetonitrile compared with its hydrogen‐bonding analogue, owing to considerable amplification of the Ru^II‐center‐based metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MLCT) emission response and luminescence lifetime. Detailed solution‐state studies reveal a higher association constant, lower limit of detection, and greater change in lifetime for complex 1 in the presence of phosphates compared with its hydrogen‐bonding analogue, complex 2 . The ¹H NMR titration study with H₂PO₄^? ascertains that the binding of H₂PO₄^? occurs exclusively through halogen‐bonding or hydrogen‐bonding interactions in complexes 1 [PF₆]₂ and 2 [PF₆]₂, respectively. Importantly, the single‐crystal X‐ray structure confirms the first ever report on metal‐assisted second‐sphere recognition of H₂PO₄^? and H₂P₂O₇^2? with 1 through a solitary C?I???anion halogen‐bonding interaction.     

Adipato‐Bridged Mixed Ligand catena Complexes: ${_{\infty}^1}${[M(phen)(H2O)]L2/2} with M = NiII,CuII, ZnII; H2L = Adipic Acid

Three adipato bridged mixed ligand catena complexes {[M(phen)(H₂O)]‐(C₆H₈O₄)_2/2} with M = Ni^II ( 1 ), Cu^II ( 2 ), Zn^II ( 3 ) were synthesized. Structure determination based on X‐ray diffraction shows that they crystallize isostructurally in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no. 15) with cell dimensions of: 1 a = 22.451(4)Å, b = 9.041(1)Å, c = 17.440(2)Å, β = 103.41(1)°, U = 3443.4(9)ų, Z = 8; 2 a = 22.479(2)Å, b = 9.067(1)Å, c = 17.494(3)Å, β = 103.67(1)°, U = 3464.6(8)ų, Z = 8; 3 a = 22.635(3)Å, b = 9.052(1)Å, c = 17.571(3)Å, β = 103.24(1)°, U = 3504.5(9)ų, Z = 8. The crystal structure consists of 1D {[M(phen)(H₂O)]‐(C₆H₈O₄)_2/2} zigzag chains, in which the metal atoms are all octahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligands and four O atoms of one H₂O molecule and two adipato ligands. The zigzag chains are held together by interchain π‐π stacking interactions and interchain hydrogen bonds.     

Synthesis and Characterization of β‐Diketiminate Aluminum Compounds and Their Use in the Ring‐Opening Polymerization of ε‐Caprolactone

Four aluminum alkyl compounds, [CH{(CH₃)CN‐2,4,6‐MeC₆H₂}₂AlMe₂] ( 1 ), [CH{(CH₃)CN‐2,4,6‐MeC₆H₂}₂AlEt₂] ( 2 ), [CH{(CH₃)CN‐2‐iPrC₆H₄}₂AlMe₂] ( 3 ), and [CH{(CH₃)CN‐2‐iPrC₆H₄}₂AlEt₂] ( 4 ), bearing β‐diketiminate ligands [CH{(Me)CN‐2,4,6‐MeC₆H₂}]₂ (L¹H) and [CH{(Me)CN‐2‐ⁱPrC₆H₄}]₂ (L²H) were obtained from the reactions of trimethylaluminum, triethylaluminum with the corresponding β‐diketiminate, respectively. All compounds were characterized by ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, single‐crystal X‐ray structural analysis, and elemental analysis. Compounds 1 – 4 were found to catalyze the ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) of ε‐caprolactone (ε‐CL) with good activity.     

New Heterocyclic Organophosphorus–Sulfur–Nitrogen Compounds,Syntheses and Structures

The new compound C₁₀H₆P(S)[NSi(CH₃)₃]₂P(S) ( 3 ) which contains a P₂N₂ heterocycle has been prepared in low yield by partial thermal decomposition of 1-{[N,N′-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamidinium]sulfido}-3-(trimethylsilylamino)-1 H,3 H,1 λ⁵,3 λ⁵-naphtho[1,8 a,8-cd][1,2,6]thiadiphosphinine-1,3-dithione [CH₃C{NHSi(CH₃)₃}₂]⁺[C₁₀H₆P(S)(NHSiMe₃)SP(S)₂]^– ( 2 ). Reaction of 2 with potassium hydroxide in acetonitrile gives the completely desilylated product [CH₃C(NH₂)₂]⁺[C₁₀H₆P(S)(NH₂)SP(S)₂]^– ( 4 ). The structures of the new compounds 3 and 4 were elucidated by FTIR and NMR spectroscopy methods and by X-ray structure analyses.     

Supramolecular Assembly of Triangulo Pd(II) Diimine Complexes Containing Triply‐Bridging Sulfide Ligands

We report here a substituent effect of diimines on the solid‐state assembly of interesting triangulo Pd(II) complexes, [(Pd(d‐t‐bpy))₃(μJ₃‐S)₂][NO₃]₂ 1 ·[NO₃]₂ and [(Pd(bpy))₃(μ₃‐S)₂][ClO₄]₂ 2 ·[ClO₄]₂ (d‐t‐bpy = 4,4′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine, bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine). 2 ·[ClO₄]₂ shows the intermolecular π···π interactions leading to the formation of one‐dimensional frameworks, whereas 1 ·[NO₃]₂ only shows the discrete structure in the solid state, featuring an interesting herring‐bone arrangement. The variation in structural motifs from 1 ·[NO₃]₂ to 2 ·[ClO₄]₂ is expected to be dominated by the substituent's steric hindrance for the diimine ligand. Thus, the crystal‐engineering approach has proved successful in the solid‐state packing due to a substituent's modification of the diimine ligand.     

Syntheses and crystal structures of two heterometallic iodoplumbates containing mixed‐valence copper(I/II)

Mixed‐valence copper(I/II) atoms have been introduced successfully into a Pb/I skeleton to obtain two heterometallic iodoplumbates, namely poly[bis(tetra‐n‐butylammonium) [bis(μ₃‐dimethyldithiocarbamato)dodeca‐μ₃‐iodido‐hexa‐μ₂‐iodido‐tetracopper(I)copper(II)hexalead(II)]], {(C₁₆H₃₆N)₂[Cu₄^ICu^IIPb₆(C₃H₆NS₂)₂I₁₈]}_n , (I), and poly[[μ₃‐iodido‐tri‐μ₂‐iodido‐iodido[bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)copper(I)]copper(I)copper(II)lead(II)] hemiiodine], {[Cu^ICu^IIPbI₅(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂]·0.5I₂}_n , (II), under solution and solvothermal conditions, respectively. Compound (I) contains two‐dimensional anionic layers, which are built upon the linkages of Cu^II(S₂CNMe₂)₂ units and one‐dimensional anionic Pb/I/Cu^I chains. Tetra‐n‐butylammonium cations are located between the anionic layers and connected to them via C—H…I hydrogen‐bonding interactions. Compound (II) exhibits a one‐dimensional neutral structure, which is composed of [PbI₅] square pyramids, [Cu^II₄] tetrahedra and [Cu^IIN₄I] trigonal bipyramids. Face‐to‐face aromatic π–π stacking interactions between adjacent 1,10‐phenanthroline ligands stabilize the structure and assemble compound (II) into a three‐dimensional supramolecular structure. I₂ molecules lie in the voids of the structure.     

Two Succinato‐bridged Zinc(II) Phenanthroline Complexes: [Zn(phen)L2/2](H2L) and [(phen)2Zn(μ‐L)Zn(phen)2]L � 11H2O with H2L = Succinic Acid

Two mixed ligand Zn^II complexes [Zn(phen)L_2/2](H₂L) ( 1 ) and [(phen)₂Zn(μ‐L)Zn(phen)₂]L � 11H₂O ( 2 ) with H₂L = suc‐cinic acid were prepared and crystallographically characterized. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no. 15) with a = 13.618(1) Å, b = 9.585(1) Å, c = 15.165(1) Å, β = 96.780(6)°, V = 1965.6(3)ų, Z = 4 and complex 2 in the triclinic space group P 1¯ (no. 2) with a = 12.989(2)Å, b = 14.464(2)Å, c = 18.025(3)Å, α = 90.01(1)°, β = 109.69(1)°, γ = 112.32(1)°, V = 2917.4(8) ų, Z = 2. 1 consists of succinic acid molecules and 1D zigzag [Zn(phen)(C₄H₄O₄)_2/2] polymeric chains, in which the tetrahedrally coordinated Zn atoms are bridged by bis ‐ monodentate succinato ligands. Succinic acid molecules play an important role in supramolecular assemblies of the polymeric chains into 2D layers as well as in the stacking of 2D layers. 2 is composed of [(phen)₂Zn(μ‐L)Zn(phen)₂]²⁺ complex cations, succinate anions and hydrogen bonded water molecules. Within the divalent cations, Zn atoms are octahedrally coordinated by four N atoms of two phen ligands and two O atoms of one bis‐chelating succinato ligand. Through the intermolecular π—π stacking interactions, the complex cations form positively charged 2D layers, between which the noncoordinating succinate anions and water molecules are sandwiched.     

A two‐dimensional silver(I) coordination polymer constructed from 4‐aminophenylarsonate and triphenylphosphane: poly[[(μ3‐4‐aminophenylarsonato‐κ3N:O:O)(triphenylphosphane‐κP)silver(I)] monohydrate]

The title compound, {[Ag(C₆H₇AsNO₃)(C₁₈H₁₅P)]·H₂O}_n, has been synthesized from the reaction of 4‐aminophenylarsonic acid with silver nitrate, in aqueous ammonia, with the addition of triphenylphosphane (PPh₃). The Ag^I centre is four‐coordinated by one amino N atom, one PPh₃ P atom and two arsonate O atoms, forming a severely distorted [AgNPO₂] tetrahedron. Two Ag^I‐centred tetrahedra are held together to produce a dinuclear [Ag₂O₂N₂P₂] unit by sharing an O–O edge. 4‐Aminophenylarsonate (Hapa⁻) adopts a μ₃‐κ³N:O:O‐tridentate coordination mode connecting two dinuclear units, resulting in a neutral [Ag(Hapa)(PPh₃)]_n layer lying parallel to the (10) plane. The PPh₃ ligands are suspended on both sides of the [Ag(Hapa)(PPh₃)]_n layer, displaying up and down orientations. There is an R₂²(8) hydrogen‐bonded dimer involving two arsonate groups from two Hapa⁻ ligands related by a centre of inversion. Additionally, there are hydrogen‐bonding interactions involving the solvent water molecules and the arsonate and amine groups of the Hapa⁻ ligands, and weak π–π stacking interactions within the [Ag(Hapa)(PPh₃)]_n layer. These two‐dimensional layers are further assembled by weak van der Waals interactions to form the final architecture.     

Vinylene‐Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks by Base‐Catalyzed Aldol Condensation

Two 2D covalent organic frameworks (COFs) linked by vinylene (?CH=CH?) groups (V‐COF‐1 and V‐COF‐2) are synthesized by exploiting the electron deficient nature of the aromatic s‐triazine unit of C₃‐symmetric 2,4,6‐trimethyl‐s‐triazine (TMT). The acidic terminal methyl hydrogens of TMT can easily be abstracted by a base, resulting in a stabilized carbanion, which further undergoes aldol condensation with multitopic aryl aldehydes to be reticulated into extended crystalline frameworks (V‐COFs). Both V‐COF‐1 (with terepthalaldehyde (TA)) and V‐COF‐2 (with 1,3,5‐tris(p‐formylphenyl)benzene (TFPB)) are polycrystalline and exhibit permanent porosity and BET surface areas of 1341 m² g^?1 and 627 m² g^?1, respectively. Owing to the close proximity (3.52 Å) of the pre‐organized vinylene linkages within adjacent 2D layers stacked in eclipsed fashion, [2+2] photo‐cycloadditon in V‐COF‐1 formed covalent crosslinks between the COF layers.     

Two Glutarato Bridged Coordination Polymers: ${_{\infty}^1}${[Mn(phen)]2L4/2} and ${_{\infty}^1}${[Zn(phen)(H2O)]L2/2}·H2O with H2L = Glutaric Acid

Two new glutarato bridged coordination polymers {[Mn(phen)]₂(C₅H₆O₄)_4/2} ( 1 ) and {[Zn(phen)(H₂O)](C₅H₆O₄)_2/2}· H₂O ( 2 ) were structurally characterized on the basis of single crystal X‐ray diffraction data. Crystal data: ( 1 ) P2/c (no. 13), a = 10.340(2)Å, b = 10.525(2)Å, c = 13.891(2)Å, β = 98.31(1)°, U = 1495.9(5)ų, Z = 2; ( 2 ) P2₁/n (no. 14), a = 6.738(1)Å, b = 25.636(3)Å, c = 10.374(1)Å, β = 106.13(1)°, U = 1721.4(4)ų, Z = 4. Complex 1 consists of 1D ribbon‐like {[Mn(phen)]₂(C₅H₆O₄)_4/2} chains, in which the [Mn(phen)] units were interlinked by glutarato ligands to generate 8‐ and 16‐membered rings. The Mn atoms are octahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and four O atoms of three glutarato ligands with d(Mn‐N) = 2.270, 2.276Å, d(Mn‐O) = 2.114—2.283Å. Through the interchain π‐π stacking interactions, the 1D chains are assembled into 2D puckered layers, which are further held together by interlayer π‐π stacking interactions into a 3D network. Complex 2 is built up by 1D {[Zn(phen)(H₂O)](C₅H₆O₄)_2/2} linear chains and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The Zn atoms are coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and three O atoms of one H₂O molecule and two glutarato ligands to form slightly elongated trigonal bipyramids with the water O atom and one phen N atom at the apical positions (d(Zn‐N) = 2.101, 2.168Å, d(Zn‐O) = 1.991—2.170Å). The 1D linear chains result from [Zn(phen)(H₂O)] units bridged by bis‐monodentate glutarato ligands. The resulting 1D chains are assembled by π‐π stacking interactions into 2D layers, between which the hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules are situated.     

Desymmetrization of an Octahedral Coordination Complex Inside a Self‐Assembled Exoskeleton

The synthesis of a centrally functionalized, ribbon‐shaped [6]polynorbornane ligand L that self‐assembles with Pd^II cations into a {Pd₂ L ₄} coordination cage is reported. The shape‐persistent {Pd₂ L ₄} cage contains two axial cationic centers and an array of four equatorial H‐bond donors pointing directly towards the center of the cavity. This precisely defined supramolecular environment is complementary to the geometry of classic octahedral complexes [M(XY)₆] with six diatomic ligands. Very strong binding of [Pt(CN)₆]^2? to the cage was observed, with the structure of the host–guest complex {[Pt(CN)₆]@Pd₂L₄} supported by NMR spectroscopy, MS, and X‐ray data. The self‐assembled shell imprints its geometry on the encapsulated guest, and desymmetrization of the octahedral platinum species by the influence of the D_4h‐symmetric second coordination sphere was evidenced by IR spectroscopy. [Fe(CN)₆]^3? and square‐planar [Pt(CN)₄]^2? were strongly bound. Smaller octahedral anions such as [SiF₆]^2?, neutral carbonyl complexes ([M(CO)₆]; M=Cr, Mo, W) and the linear [Ag(CN)₂]^? anion were only weakly bound, showing that both size and charge match are key factors for high‐affinity binding.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Magnetic Properties of {[Cu(phen)]2(C4H2O4)2} · 4.5H2O with C4H4O4 = Maleic Acid

Reaction of CuCl₂ · 2H₂O, phenanthroline, maleic acid and NaOH in CH₃OH/H₂O (1:1 v/v) at pH = 7.0 yielded blue {[Cu(phen)]₂(C₄H₂O₄)₂} · 4.5H₂O, which crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no. 15) with cell dimensions: a = 18.127(2)Å, b = 12.482(2)Å, c = 14.602(2)Å, β = 103.43(1)°, U = 3213.5(8)ų, Z = 4. The crystal structure consists of the centrosymmetric dinuclear {[Cu(phen)]₂(C₄H₂O₄)₂} complex molecules and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The Cu atoms are each square‐pyramidally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and three carboxyl O atoms of two maleato ligands with one carboxyl O atom at the apical position (d(Cu‐N) = 2.008, 2.012Å, equatorial d(Cu‐O) = 1.933, 1.969Å, axial d(Cu‐O) = 2.306Å). Two square‐pyramids are condensed via two apical carboxyl O atoms with a relatively larger Cu···Cu separation of 3.346(1)Å. The dinuclear complex molecules are assembled via the intermolecular π—π stacking interactions into 1D ribbons. Crossover of the resulting ribbons via interribbon π—π stacking interactions forms a 3D network with the tunnels occupied by H₂O molecules. The title complex behaves paramagnetically between 5—300 K, following the Curie‐Weiss law _χm(T—θ) = 0.435 cm³ · mol^—1 · K with θ = 1.59 K.     

Two Heteroleptic Zinc(II) Complexes: [Zn(phen)(C9H15O6)2] and [Zn2(phen)2(H2O)2(C10H16O4)2] · 3H2O

Reactions of a freshly prepared Zn(OH)_2‐2x(CO₃)x · yH₂O precipitate, phenanthroline with azelaic and sebacic acid in CH₃OH/H₂O afforded [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] ( 1 ) and [Zn₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₂(C₁₀H₁₆O₄)₂] · 3H₂O ( 2 ), respectively. They were structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction methods. Compound 1 consists of complex molecules [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] in which the Zn atoms are tetrahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and two O atoms of different monodentate hydrogen azelaato groups. Intermolecular C(alkyl)‐H···π interactions and the intermolecular C(aryl)‐H···O and O‐H···O hydrogen bonds are responsible for the supramolecular assembly of the [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] complexes. Compound 2 is built up from crystal H₂O molecules and the centrosymmetric binuclear [Zn₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₂(C₁₀H₁₆O₄)₂] complex, in which two [Zn(phen)(H₂O)]²⁺ moieties are bridged by two sebacato ligands. Through the intermolecular C(alkyl)‐H···O hydrogen bonds and π‐π stacking interactions, the binuclear complex molecules are assembled into layers, between which the lattice H₂O molecules are sandwiched. Crystal data: ( 1 ) C2/c (no. 15), a = 13.887(2), b = 9.790(2), c = 22.887(3)Å, β = 107.05(1)°, U = 2974.8(8)ų, Z = 4; ( 2 ) P1¯ (no. 2), a = 8.414(1), b = 10.679(1), c = 14.076(2)Å, α = 106.52(1)°, β = 91.56(1)°, γ = 99.09(1)°, U = 1193.9(2)ų, Z = 1.     

Syntheses and structures of three macrocyclic supramolecular complexes and one ZnII‐containing coordination polymer generated from a semi‐rigid multidentate N‐containing ligand

Semirigid organic ligands can adopt different conformations to construct coordination polymers with more diverse structures when compared to those constructed from rigid ligands. A new asymmetric semirigid organic ligand, 4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine ( L ), has been prepared and used to synthesize three bimetallic macrocyclic complexes and one coordination polymer, namely, bis(μ‐4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine)bis[dichloridozinc(II)] dichloromethane disolvate, [Zn₂Cl₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·2CH₂Cl₂, ( I ), the analogous chloroform monosolvate, [Zn₂Cl₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·CHCl₃, ( II ), bis(μ‐4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine)bis[diiodidozinc(II)] dichloromethane disolvate, [Zn₂I₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·2CH₂Cl₂, ( III ), and catena‐poly[[[diiodidozinc(II)]‐μ‐4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine] chloroform monosolvate], {[ZnI₂(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)]·CHCl₃}_n, ( IV ), by solution reaction with ZnX₂ (X = Cl and I) in a CH₂Cl₂/CH₃OH or CHCl₃/CH₃OH mixed solvent system at room temperature. Complex ( I ) is isomorphic with complex ( III ) and has a bimetallic ring possessing similar coordination environments for both of the Zn^II cations. Although complex ( II ) also contains a bimetallic ring, the two Zn^II cations have different coordination environments. Under the influence of the I^? anion and guest CHCl₃ molecule, complex ( IV ) displays a significantly different structure with respect to complexes ( I )–( III ). C—H…Cl and C—H…N hydrogen bonds, and π–π stacking or C—Cl…π interactions exist in complexes ( I )–( IV ), and these weak interactions play an important role in the three‐dimensional structures of ( I )–( IV ) in the solid state. In addition, the fluorescence properties of L and complexes ( I )–( IV ) were investigated.     

Variability in the Coordination Modes of 2‐Pyridineformamide Thiosemicarbazone (HAm4DH) in some Zinc(II), Cadmium(II), and Mercury(II) Complexes

The reduction of 2‐cyanopyridine by sodium in dry methanol in the presence of thiosemicarbazide produces 2‐pyridineformamide thiosemicarbazone, HAm4DH. The reactions of the potentially tridentate ligand HAm4DH with salts of Zn, Cd, and Hg gave a variety of metal‐ligand complexes. The complexes were characterized by mass spectrometry as well as IR and multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ¹³C CP/MAS, ¹¹³Cd, ¹⁹⁹Hg) spectroscopy. The crystal structures of [Zn(Am4DH)(OAc)]₂·H₂O, [Hg(HAm4DH)₂Br₂]·C₂H₅OH and [Hg(μ‐S‐Am4DH)Br] were obtained. Coordination of anionic Am4DH^? occurs through the pyridyl nitrogen, imine nitrogen and thiolato sulfur atoms, while the neutral ligands in [Hg(HAm4DH)₂Br₂] coordinate as monodentate ligands through their thione sulfur atoms. One of the acetate ligands in [Zn(Am4DH)(OAc)]₂·H₂O is bridging monodentate and the other bridging bidentate. [Hg(μ‐S‐Am4DH)Br] features five‐coordinate mercury centers with bridging thiolato sulfur atoms. The intermolecular arrangement is dictated by hydrogen bonding from the amino groups and by π‐π stacking of the pyridine rings.