The Butterfly Complex [{Cp*Cr(CO)3}2(μ,η1:1-P4)] as a Versatile Ligand and Its Unexpected P1/P3 Fragmentation

The versatile coordination behavior of the P₄ butterfly complex [{Cp*Cr(CO)₃}₂(μ,η^1:1-P₄)] ( 1 ) towards Lewis acidic pentacarbonyl compounds of Cr, Mo and W is reported. The reaction of 1 with [W(CO)₄(nbd)] (nbd=norbornadiene) yields the complex [{Cp*Cr(CO)₃}₂(μ₃,η^1:1:1:1-P₄){W(CO)₄}] ( 2 ) in which 1 serves as a chelating P₄ butterfly ligand. In contrast, reactions of 1 with [M(CO)₄(nbd)] (M=Cr ( a ), Mo ( b )) result in the step-wise formation of [{Cp*Cr(CO)₂}₂(μ₃,η^3:1:1-P₄){M(CO)₅}] ( 3 a,b ) and [{Cp*Cr(CO)₂}₂-(μ₄,η^3:1:1:1-P₄){M(CO)₅}₂] ( 4 a,b ) which contain a folded cyclo-P₄ unit. Complex 4 a undergoes an unprecedented P₁/P₃-fragmentation yielding the cyclo-P₃ complex [Cp*Cr(CO)₂(η³-P₃)] ( 5 ) and the as yet unknown phosphinidene complex [Cp*Cr(CO)₂{Cr(CO)₅}₂(μ₃-P)] ( 6 ). The identity of 6 is confirmed by spectroscopic methods and by the in situ formation of [{Cp*Cr(CO)₂(tBuNC)}P{Cr(CO)₅}₂(tBuNC)] ( 7 ). DFT calculations throw light on the bonding situation of the reported products.     

Selective Formation and Unusual Reactivity of Tetraarsabicyclo[1.1.0]butane Complexes

The selective formation of the dinuclear butterfly complexes [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ,η^1:1‐E₄)] (E=P ( 1 a ), As ( 1 b )) and [{Cp*Cr(CO)₃}₂(μ,η^1:1‐E₄)] (E=P ( 2 a ), As ( 2 b )) as new representatives of this rare class of compounds was found by reaction of E₄ with the corresponding dimeric carbonyl complexes. Complexes 1 b and 2 b are the first As₄ butterfly compounds with a bridging coordination mode. Moreover, first studies regarding the reactivity of 1 b and 2 b are presented, revealing the formation of the unprecedented As₈ cuneane complexes [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂{Cp′′′Fe(CO)}₂(μ₄,η^1:1:2:2‐As₈)] ( 3 b ) and [{Cp*Cr(CO)₃}₄(μ₄,η^1:1:1:1‐As₈)] ( 4 ). The compounds are fully characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy as well as by X‐ray structure analysis. In addition, DFT calculations give insight into the transformation pathway from the E₄ butterfly to the corresponding cuneane structural motif.     

E4 Butterfly Complexes (E=P,As) as Chelating Ligands

The coordination properties of new types of bidentate phosphane and arsane ligands with a narrow bite angle are reported. The reactions of [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ,η^1:1‐P₄)] ( 1 a ) with the copper salt [Cu(CH₃CN)₄][BF₄] leads, depending on the stoichiometry, to the formation of the spiro compound [{{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ₃,η^1:1:1:1‐P₄)}₂Cu]⁺[BF₄]^? ( 2 ) or the monoadduct [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ₃,η^1:1:2‐P₄){Cu(MeCN)}]⁺[BF₄]^? ( 3 ). Similarly, the arsane ligand [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ,η^1:1‐As₄)] ( 1 b ) reacts with [Cu(CH₃CN)₄][BF₄] to give [{{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ₃,η^1:1:1:1‐As₄)}₂Cu]⁺[BF₄]^? ( 5 ). Protonation of 1 a occurs at the “wing tip” phosphorus atoms, which is in line with the results of DFT calculations. The compounds are characterized by spectroscopic methods (heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy and IR spectrometry) and by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.     

An Approach to Mixed PnAsm Ligand Complexes

The reaction of a P₄ butterfly complex with yellow arsenic yields the largest mixed P_nAs_m ligand complexes synthesized to date. [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ,η^1:1‐P₄)] reacts with As₄ to yield [{Cp′′′Fe}₂(μ,η^4:4‐P_nAs_4‐n)] and [Cp′′′Fe(η⁵‐P_nAs_5‐n)]. Mass spectrometry together with NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography give clear evidence about the arrangement of the E positions within the cyclo‐E₅ and E₄ moieties of the products. Moreover, the results of DFT calculations agree well with the experimental determined outcomes. By coordinating the E₄ complex [{Cp′′′Fe}₂(μ,η^4:4‐P_nAs_4‐n)] with CuCl, a rearrangement of the E positions occurs in favor with a preferred phosphorus coordination towards copper atoms in the resulting 1D polymeric chain.     

Mehrkernige Eisen/Tantal‐ und Tantal‐Komplexe mit Asn‐Liganden

Polynuclear Iron/Tantalum and Tantalum Complexes with As_n Ligands Starting with [Cp@Ta(CO)₄] ( 1 ) (Cp@ = C₅H₃^tBu₂‐1,3) and As₄ or (^tBuAs)₄ ( 2 ) its thermolysis at 190 °C in decalin gives [{Cp@Ta}₂(μ‐η⁴ : η⁴‐As₈)] ( 3 ), which is also formed according to equation (2) in addition to [{Cp@Ta}₃As₆] ( 5 ). The reaction of 1 or [{Cp*(OC)₂Fe}₂] ( 6 ) with 3 affords 5 or [{Cp*Fe}{Cp@Ta}As₅] ( 8 ) demonstrating the use of 3 as As_n source. 8 can also be synthesized from 1 and [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 7 ) for which the cothermolysis of 2 and 6 gives a better yield.     

LiE(SiMe3)2 (E = P,As) als Synthesebaustein zur Darstellung von Molybdänkomplexen mit EH funktionellen Liganden

LiE(SiMe₃)₂ (E = P, As) as Building Unit of Molybdenum Complexes with EH Ligands The complex [{CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ‐H)(μ‐PH₂)] ( 1 ) can be obtained in a one‐pot reaction using [CpMo(CO)₂]₂, LiP(SiMe₃)₂, MeOH and HBF₄. Experiments to synthesize [{CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ‐H)(μ‐AsH₂)] in an analogous reaction sequence using [CpMo(CO)₂]₂ and LiAs(SiMe₃)₂ failed. However, the products ‐[{CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ, η²‐As₂)] and [{CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ‐H)(μ₄‐As){CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ₄, η¹:η¹‐As₂H){CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ‐H)] ( 3 ) could be obtained via this reaction. The deprotonated derivative of 1 , K[{CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ‐PH₂)] ( 2 ), which can be obtained by reaction of 1 with KH, doesn't react with GaCl₃ under KCl elimination as expected. Instead, the Lewis acid/base adduct K[{CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ‐PH₂)(GaCl₃)] ( 4 ) is formed, which adopts a polymeric chain structure in the solid state. The structural and the spectroscopic data of the products are discussed.     

Reaction of Pentelidene Complexes with Diazoalkanes: Stabilization of Parent 2,3‐Dipnictabutadienes

The reaction of the phosphinidene complex [Cp*P{W(CO)₅}₂] ( 1 a ) with diphenyldiazomethane leads to [{W(CO)₅}Cp*P=NN{W(CO)₅}=CPh₂] ( 2 ). Compound 2 is a rare example of a phosphadiazadiene ligand (R‐P=N?N=CR′R′′) complex. At temperatures above 0 °C, 2 decomposes into the complex [{W(CO)₅}PCp*{N(H)N=CPh₂)₂] ( 3 ), among other species. The reaction of the pentelidene complexes [Cp*E{W(CO)₅}₂] (E=P, As) with diazomethane (CH₂NN) proceeds differently. For the arsinidene complex ( 1 b ), only the arsaalkene complex 4 b [{W(CO)₅}₂{η^1:2‐(Cp*)As=CH₂}] is formed. The reaction with the phosphinidene complex ( 1 a ) results in three products, the two phosphaalkene complexes [{W(CO)₅}₂{η^1:2‐(R)P=CH₂}] ( 4 a : R=Cp*, 5 : R=H) and the triazaphosphole derivative [{W(CO)₅}P(Cp*)‐CH₂‐N{W(CO)₅}=N‐N(N=CH₂)] ( 6 a ). The phosphaalkene complex ( 4 a ) and the arsaalkene complex ( 4 b ) are not stable at room temperature and decompose to the complexes [{W(CO)₅}₄(CH₂=E?E=CH₂)] ( 7 a : E=P, 7 b : E=As), which are the first examples of complexes with parent 2,3‐diphospha‐1,3‐butadiene and 2,3‐diarsa‐1,3‐butadiene ligands.     

Unusual tetra- and penta-ruthenium complexes from linking of ethylidyne and vinylidene ligands

The complexes [Ru₂(CO)₂(μ-CO)(μ-CMe)(η-C₅H₅)₂]^? and [Ru₂CO₂(μ-CO)(μ-CCH₂)(η-C₅H₅)₂] react together to give [{Ru₂CO)₃(η-C₅H₅)₂}₂(μ-CMeCHCH)]⁺ and [{Ru₃(CO)₃(η-C₅H₅)₃}(μ-CCH₂CHC){Ru₂(CO)₃(η-C₅H₅)₂}], each characterised by X-ray diffraction. The former results from ethylidyne-vinylidene linking followed by an alkylidyne to vinyl rearrangement.     

Stepwise Formation of a 1,3‐Butadiene Analogue of Mixed Heavier Group 15 Elements

The reaction of the phosphinidene complex [Cp*P{W(CO)₅}₂] ( 1 a ) with di‐tert‐butylcarboimidophosphene leads to the P? C cage compound 6 and the Lewis acid–base adduct [Cp*P{W(CO)₅}₂(CNtBu)] ( 2 a ). In contrast, the arsinidene complex shows a different reactivity. At low temperatures, the arsaphosphene complex [{W(CO)₅}{η²‐(Cp*)As?P(tBu)}{W(CO)₅}] ( 3 ) is formed. At these temperatures, 3 reacts further with a second equivalent of carboimidophosphene to form [{W(CO)₅}{η²‐{(Cp*)(tBu)P}As?P(tBu)}{W(CO)₅}] ( 5 ), probably by the insertion of a phosphinidene unit (tBuP) into an As? C bond. In contrast, at room temperature 3 reacts further by a radical‐type reaction to form [{(tBu)P?As? As?P(tBu)}{W(CO)₅}₄] ( 4 ). Compound 4 is the first example of a neutral, 1,3‐butadiene analogue containing only mixed heavier Group 15 elements. It consists of two P?As double bonds connected by arsenic atoms.     

Rearrangement of a P4 Butterfly Complex—The Formation of a Homoleptic Phosphorus–Iron Sandwich Complex

The versatile coordination behavior of the P₄ butterfly complex [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ,η^1:1-P₄)] ( 1 , Cp′′′=η⁵-C₅H₂^tBu₃) towards different iron(II) compounds is presented. The reaction of 1 with [FeBr₂⋅dme] (dme=dimethoxyethane) leads to the chelate complex [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ₃,η^1:1:2-P₄){FeBr₂}] ( 2 ), whereas, in the reaction with [Fe(CH₃CN)₆][PF₆]₂, an unprecedented rearrangement of the P₄ butterfly structural motif leads to the cyclo-P₄ moiety in {(Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂)₂(μ₃,η^1:1:4-P₄)}₂Fe][PF₆]₂ ( 3 ). Complex 3 represents the first fully characterized “carbon-free” sandwich complex containing cyclo-P₄R₂ ligands in a homoleptic-like iron–phosphorus-containing molecule. Alternatively, 2 can be transformed into 3 by halogen abstraction and subsequent coordination of 1 . The additional isolated side products, [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ₃,η^1:1:2-P₄){Cp′′′Fe(CO)}][PF₆] ( 4 ) and [{Cp′′′Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ₃,η^1:1:4-P₄){Cp′′′Fe}][PF₆] ( 5 ), give insight into the stepwise activation of the P₄ butterfly moiety in 1 .     

Highly Dynamic Coordination Behavior of Pn Ligand Complexes towards “Naked” Cu+ Cations

Reactions of Cu⁺ containing the weakly coordinating anion [Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄]^? with the polyphosphorus complexes [{CpMo(CO)₂}₂(μ,η²:η²‐P₂)] ( A ), [CpM(CO)₂(η³‐P₃)] (M=Cr( B1 ), Mo ( B2 )), and [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] ( C ) are presented. The X‐ray structures of the products revealed mononuclear ( 4 ) and dinuclear ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) Cu^I complexes, as well as the one‐dimensional coordination polymer ( 5 a ) containing an unprecedented [Cu₂( C )₃]²⁺ paddle‐wheel building block. All products are readily soluble in CH₂Cl₂ and exhibit fast dynamic coordination behavior in solution indicated by variable temperature ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy.     

Size-determining dependencies in supramolecular organometallic host-guest chemistry

Treatment of the pentaphosphaferrocene [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] with Cu^I halides in the presence of different templates leads to novel fullerene‐like spherical molecules that serve as hosts for the templates. If ferrocene is used as the template the 80‐vertex ball [Cp₂Fe]@[{Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)}₁₂{CuCl}₂₀] ( 4 ), with an overall icosahedral C₈₀ topological symmetry, is obtained. This result shows the ability of ferrocene to compete successfully with the internal template of the reaction system [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)], although the 90‐vertex ball [{Cp*Fe(η⁵:η¹:η¹:η¹:η¹:η¹‐P₅)}₁₂(CuCl)₁₀(Cu₂Cl₃)₅{Cu(CH₃CN)₂}₅] ( 2 a ) containing pentaphosphaferrocene as a guest is also formed as a byproduct. With use of the triple‐decker sandwich complex [(CpCr)₂(μ,η⁵‐As₅)] as a template the reaction between [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] and CuBr leads to the 90‐vertex ball [(CpCr)₂(μ,η⁵‐As₅)]@[{Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)}₁₂{CuBr}₁₀{Cu₂Br₃}₅{Cu(CH₃CN)₂}₅] ( 6 ), in which the complete molecule acts as a template. However, if the corresponding reaction is instead carried out with CuCl, cleavage of the triple‐decker complex is found and the 80‐vertex ball [CpCr(η⁵‐As₅)]@[{Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)}₁₂{CuCl}₂₀] ( 5 ) is obtained. This accommodates as its guest [CpCr(η⁵‐As₅)], which has only 16 valence electrons in a triplet ground state and is not known as a free molecule. The triple‐decker sandwich complex [(CpCr)₂(μ,η⁵‐As₅)] requires 53.1 kcal mol^?1 to undergo cleavage (as calculated by DFT methods) and therefore this reaction is clearly endothermic. All new products have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. A favoured orientation of the guest molecules inside the host cages has been identified, which shows π???π stacking of the five‐membered rings (Cp and cyclo‐As₅) of the guests and the cyclo‐P₅ rings of the nanoballs of the hosts.     

Coordination Behavior of a P4-Butterfly Complex towards Transition Metal Lewis Acids: Preservation versus Rearrangement

The reactivity of the P₄ butterfly complex [{Cp’’’Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ,η^1:1-P₄)] ( 1 , Cp’’’=η⁵-C₅H₂tBu₃) towards divalent Co, Ni and Zn salts is investigated. The reaction with the bromide salts leads to [{Cp’’’Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ₃,η^2:1:1-P₄){MBr₂}] (M=Co ( 2Co ), Ni ( 2Ni ), Zn ( 2Zn )) in which the P₄ butterfly scaffold is preserved. The use of the weakly ligated Co complex [Co(NCCH₃)₆][SbF₆]₂, results in the formation of [{(Cp’’’Fe(CO)₂)₂(μ₃,η^4:1:1-P₄)}₂Co][SbF₆]₃ ( 3 ), which represents the second example of a homoleptic-like octaphospha-metalla-sandwich complex. The formation of the threefold positively charged complex 3 occurs via redox processes, which among others also enables the formation of [{Cp’’’Fe(CO)₂}₄(μ₅,η^4:1:1:1:1-P₈){Co(CO)₂}][SbF₆] ( 4 ), bearing a rare octaphosphabicyclo[3.3.0]octane unit as a ligand. On the other hand, the reaction with [Zn(NCCH₃)₄][PF₆]₂ yields the spiro complex [{(Cp’’’Fe(CO)₂)₂(μ₃,η^2:1:1-P₄)}₂Zn][PF₆]₂ ( 5 ) under preservation of the initial structural motif.     

First Stabilization of 14‐Electron Rhodium(I) Complexes by Hemichelation

Hemichelation is emerging as a new mode of coordination where non‐covalent interactions crucially contribute to the cohesion of electron‐unsaturated organometallic complexes. This study discloses an unprecedented demonstration of this concept to a Group 9 metal, that is, Rh^I. The syntheses of new 14‐electron Rh^I complexes were achieved by choosing the anti‐[(η⁶:η⁶‐fluorenyl){Cr(CO)₃}₂] anion as the ambiphilic hemichelating ligand, which was treated with [{Rh(nbd)Cl}₂] (nbd=norbornadiene) and [{Rh(CO)₂Cl}₂]. The new T‐shaped Rh^I hemichelates were characterized by analytical and structural methods. Investigations using the methods of the DFT and electron‐density topology analysis (NCI region analysis, QTAIM theory) confirmed the closed‐shell, non‐covalent and attractive characters of the interaction between the Rh^I center and the proximal Cr(CO)₃ moiety. This study shows that, by appropriate tuning of the electronic properties of the ambiphilic ligand, truly coordination‐unsaturated Rh^I complexes can be synthesized in a manageable form.     

Iridium Complexes of 2,2′‐Bidipyrrins

The reaction of [{Ir(cod)(μ‐Cl)}₂] and K₂CO₃ or of [{Ir(cod)(μ‐OMe)}₂] alone with the non‐natural tetrapyrrole 2,2′‐bidipyrrin (H₂BDP) yields, depending on the stoichiometry, the mononuclear complex [Ir(cod)(HBDP)] or the homodinuclear complex [{Ir(cod)}₂(BDP)]. Both complexes react readily with carbon monoxide to yield the species [Ir(CO)₂(HBDP)] and [{Ir(CO)₂}₂(BDP)], respectively. The results from NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray diffraction reveal different conformations for the tetrapyrrolic ligand in both complexes. The reaction of [{Ir(coe)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] with H₂BDP proceeds differently and yields the macrocyclic [4e^?,2H⁺]‐oxidized product [IrCl₂(9‐Meic)] (9‐Meic = monoanion of 9‐methyl‐9,10‐isocorrole), which can be addressed as an iridium analog of cobalamin.     

Molecular Polyarsenides of the Rare‐Earth Elements

Reduction of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] with [Cp′′₂Sm(thf)] (Cp′′=η⁵‐1,3‐(tBu)₂C₅H₃) under various conditions led to [(Cp′′₂Sm)(μ,η⁴:η⁴‐As₄)(Cp*Fe)] and [(Cp′′₂Sm)₂As₇(Cp*Fe)]. Both compounds are the first polyarsenides of the rare‐earth metals. [(Cp′′₂Sm)(μ,η⁴:η⁴‐As₄)(Cp*Fe)] is also the first d/f‐triple decker sandwich complex with a purely inorganic planar middle deck. The central As₄^2? unit is isolobal with the 6π‐aromatic cyclobutadiene dianion (CH)₄^2?. [(Cp′′₂Sm)₂As₇(Cp*Fe)] contains an As₇^3? cage, which has a norbornadiene‐like structure with two short As?As bonds in the scaffold. DFT calculations confirm all the structural observations. The As?As bond order inside the cyclo As₄ ligand in [(Cp′′₂Sm)(μ,η⁴:η⁴‐As₄)(Cp*Fe)] was estimated to be in between an As?As single bond and a formally aromatic As₄^2? system.     

Di- and poly-nuclear transition metal complexes as catalysts for the metal carbonyl substitution reaction. The role of supported metals and metal oxides as catalyst promoters

Various di- and poly-nuclear transition metal complexes have been investigated as catalysts for the metal carbonyl substitution reaction. The complexes [{(η⁵-C₅H₄R)Fe(CO)₂} ₂] (R = H, Me, CO₂Me, OMe, O(CH₂)₄OH) and [{(η⁵-C₅H₅)-Ru(CO)₂} ₂] are active catalysts for a range of substitution reactions including the probe reaction [Fe(CO)₄(CNBu^t)] + Bu^tNC → [Fe(CO)₃(CNBu^t)₂] + CO. [{(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Fe(CO)₂}₂] is catalytically active only on irradiation with visible light. For [{η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)₂}₂] and a range ofisocyanides RNC ( R = Bu^t, C₆H₅CH₂, 2,6-Me₂C₆H₃), catalyst modification by substitution with isocyanide is a major factor influencing the degree of the catalytic effects observed, e.g. [{(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)(CNBu^t)}₂] is approximately 35 times as active as [(η⁵-C₅H₅)₂FE₂(CO)₃(CNBu^t)] for the [Fe(CO)₄(CNBu^t)] → [Fe(CO)₃(CNBu^t)₂] conversion. Mechanistic studies on this system suggest that the catalytic substitution step probably involves a rapid intermolecular attack of isonitrile, possibly on a labile catalyst-substrate radical intermediate such as {[Fe(CO)₄(CNR)][(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)₂]}; or on a reactive radical cation such as [Fe(CO)₄(CNR)]⁺ generated via electron transfer between the substrate and the catalyst. Other transition metal complexes which also catalyze the substitution of CO by isocyanide in [Fe(CO)₄(CNR)] (and [M(CO)₆] (M = Cr, Mo, W), [Mn₂(CO)₁₀], [Re₂(CO)₁₀]) include [Ru₃(CO)₁₂], [H₄Ru₄(CO)₁₂], [M₄(CO)₁₂] (M = Co, Ir) and [Co₂(CO)₈]. These reactions conform to the general mechanistic patterns established for [{(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)₂}₂], suggesting a similar mechanism. A range of materials, notably PtO₂, PdO and Pd/C, act as promoters for the homogeneous di- and poly-nuclear transition metal catalysts, and can even be used to induce activity in normally inactive dimer and cluster complexes e.g. [Os₃(CO)₁₂]. This promotion is attributed to at least three possible effects: the removal of catalyst inhibitors, a catalyzed substitution of the homogeneous catalyst partner, and a possible homogeneous-heterogeneous interaction which promotes the formation of catalytic intermediates.     

Dreiecksdodekaedrische Heterotri‐ und ‐tetrametall‐Eisen–Ruthenium‐Cluster mit CpR‐ und Pn‐Liganden (n = 5, 4)

Triangulated Dodecahedral Heterotrimetallic‐ and ‐tetrametallic Iron–Ruthenium Clusters with Cp^R and P_n Ligands (n = 5, 4) The cothermolysis of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] ( 1 ) and [{Cp″(OC)₂Ru}₂](Ru–Ru) ( 2 ), Cp″ = C₅H₃But₂‐1,3, affords low yields of [Cp″Ru(η⁵‐P₅)] ( 3 ) and [{Cp″Ru}₂P₄] ( 4 ) as well as the triangulated dodecahedral hetero‐ and homotrimetallic clusters [{Cp″Ru}₂{Cp*Fe}P₅] ( 5 ), [{Cp″Ru}₃P₅] ( 6 ), [{Cp*Fe}₂{Cp″Ru}P₅] ( 7 ) and the tetranuclear compound [{Cp″Ru}₃{Cp*Fe}P₄] ( 8 ). X‐ray crystallographic studies show that the P₅ ligand in the distorted M₂M′P₅‐triangulated dodecahedra of 5 and 7 offers an unusual novel coordination mode derived from the educt 1 .     

Synthesis and Platinum Complexes of an Alane‐Appended 1,1′‐Bis(phosphino)ferrocene Ligand

An aryldimethylalane‐appended analogue of 1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene, FcPPAl, was prepared, and reaction with [Pt(nb)₃] (nb=norbornene) afforded [Pt(η²‐nb)(FcPPAl)] ( 1 ). Heating a solution of 1 to 80 °C resulted in crystallization of [{Pt(FcPPAl)}₂] ( 2 ), whereas treatment of 1 with C₂H₄, C₂Ph₂, H₂, or CO provided [PtL(FcPPAl)] [L=C₂H₄ ( 3 ), C₂Ph₂ ( 4 )], [PtH₂(FcPPAl)] ( 5 ), and [Pt(CO)(FcPPAl)] ( 6 ). In all complexes, the FcPPAl ligand is coordinated through both phosphines and the alane. Whereas 2 adopts a T‐shaped geometry at platinum, 3 – 5 are square‐pyramidal, and 6 is distorted square‐planar. The hydride and carbonyl complexes feature unusual multicenter bonding involving platinum, aluminum, and a hydride or carbonyl ligand.     

Reaktionen des [η2-{P–PtBu2}Pt(PPh3)2] und [η2-{P–PtBu2}Pt(dppe)] mit Metallcarbonylen. Bildung von [η2-{(CO)5M · PPtBu2}Pt(PPh3)2] (M = Cr,W) und [η2-{(CO)5Cr · PPtBu2}Pt(dppe)]

Coordination Chemistry of P-rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVI [1] Reactions of [g²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] and [g²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] with Metal Carbonyls. Formation of [g²-{(CO)₅M · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] (M = Cr, W) and [g²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] [η²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 4 reacts with M(CO)₅ · THF (M = Cr, W) by adding the M(CO)₅ group to the phosphinophosphinidene ligand yielding [η²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 1 , or [η²-{(CO)₅W · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 2 , respectively. Similarly, [η²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] 5 yields [η²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] 3 . Compounds 1 , 2 and 3 are characterized by their ¹H- and ³¹P-NMR spectra, for 2 and 3 also crystal structure determinations were performed. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n (no. 14) with a = 1422.7(1) pm, b = 1509.3(1) pm, c = 2262.4(2) pm, β = 103.669(9)°. 3 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (no. 2) with a = 1064.55(9) pm, b = 1149.9(1) pm, c = 1693.2(1) pm, α = 88.020(8)°, β = 72.524(7)°, γ = 85.850(8)°.