Crystal Structure Analysis of 1′,2′,3′,4′‐tetrahydro‐1,3‐diphenyl‐4‐chlorospiro[2‐pyrazoline‐5,2‐napthalen]1′one

The crystal structure of the title compound “1′,2′,3′,4′‐tetrahydro‐1,3‐diphenyl‐4‐chlorospiro[2‐pyrazoline‐5,2‐napthalen] 1′one” has been determined. The structure consists of a pyrazoline ring, three aromatic rings and a tetralone moiety. All the aromatic rings are planar while the cyclohexonone ring of the tetralone moiety is in the distorted sofa conformation. The molecular packing is stabilized by C‐H…O and C‐H…π type inter molecular interactions.     

Structure Analysis of Methyl‐3,4‐dihydro‐3‐(p‐methylphenyl)‐4‐oxo‐2‐quinazolinyl thiopropionate

The crystal structure of methyl‐3, 4‐dihydro‐3‐(p‐methylphenyl)‐4‐oxo‐2‐quinazolinyl thiopropionate (C₁₉H₁₈N₂O₃S) has been determined by X‐ray diffraction methods. The compound crystallizes in the triclinic space group P with unit cell parameters: a = 9.094(2), b = 9.428(3), c = 10.612(3) Å, α = 94.55(3), β = 95.44(2), γ = 106.75(3)° and Z = 2. The structure has been refined to an R‐value of 0.054 for 2533 observed reflections [F_o > 4σ(F_o)]. The quinazoline moiety and the methyl substituted phenyl ring is almost planar. The dihedral angle between these two moieties is 84.96(8)° . The crystal structure is stabilized by an intermolecular C‐H … O interaction.     

Crystal and Molecular Structure of (9R)‐10,11‐dihydro‐6′‐methoxy‐cinchonan‐9‐ol‐4‐chlorobenzoate hydrochloride

The crystal structure of the title compound has been determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction methods. C₂₇H₂₉N₂O₃Cl.HCl is one of the cinchona alkaloids. It crystallizes in the space group P2₁2₁2₁ with a = 11.745(3), b = 12.353(6), c = 17.253(6) Å and Z = 4. The structure was refined to a final R value of 0.062 for 2155 observed reflections. The C—N distances are unequal in the quinoline ring system. In quinulidine ring, the bonds around N are more tetrahedral. The spatial arrangement and torsion angles show the open conformation of the molecule. The molecular packing is stabilized by hydrogen bonding.     

Crystal and molecular structure of 3‐phenyl‐4‐(p‐chlorobenzylamino)‐4,5‐dihydro‐1‐H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐on

The structure of the title compound, C₁₅H₁₃N₄OCl was determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction technique. The structure consists of a p‐chlorobenzylamino moiety and triazol and phenyl rings. The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 14.368(3), b = 6.255(3), c = 17.631(3) Å, β = 113.24(3)°, Z = 4, V = 1455.8(8) ų and D_x = 1.372 gcm^‐3. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full‐matrix least‐squares method (R=0.0477). The dihedral angle between the triazole moiety and the phenyl ring is 28.8(3)°. The molecular packing is stabilized by N‐H…N and N‐H…O types of inter molecular hydrogen bonds. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

The Crystal Structures of O,O‐Dimethylalpinumisoflavone and 5‐O‐Methyl‐4'‐O‐(3‐methyl‐but‐2‐en‐1‐yl)alpinumisoflavone

The petrol extract of the rootbark of Milletia Thonningii obtained by column chromatography afforded sixteen different crystalline samples to be isolated. The crystal structures of two of these compounds, O,O‐Dimethylalpinumisoflavone (I) and 5‐O‐Methyl‐4'‐O‐(3‐methyl‐but‐2‐en‐1‐yl)alpinumisoflavone (II) are being reported here. (II) has two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit and differs from (I) in a longer side chain attached to C(15) of the phenyl ring. The structural features of the three molecules in the title compounds are reported and compared. The derivatives, being subject of this article are the first reported crystal structures where the isoflavone fragment is fused to a further six membered ring that results in a tricyclic ring system. The benzopyrone fragments are planar. The dihedral angles between the benzopyrone fragment and the phenyl ring being 55.38(6)° for (I) and 44.75(15)° /44.64(15)° for the respective independent molecules of (II) are within the range of values observed for similar structures.     

Crystal structure of 2‐(2'‐hydroxyphenyl)‐6‐tributylstannyl‐4‐(3H )‐quinazolinone and 2‐(2'‐hydroxyphenyl)‐6‐iodo‐4‐(3H)‐quinazolinone

The structures of the title compounds C₂₆H₃₇N₂O₂Sn ( I ) and C₁₄H₉IN₂O₂ ( II ) were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction technique. Compound I crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 with a = 9.560(3) Å, b = 16.899(6) Å, c = 17.872(5) Å, α = 65.957(7)°, β = 83.603(5)°, γ ( = 75.242(5)°, V = 2549.8(13) ų, Z = 4, and D =1.374 g/cm³. The compound consists of a quinazolinone ring with phenol and tributylstannyl moieties. Compound II crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 7.6454(12) Å, b = 5.9270(9) Å, c = 27.975(4) Å; α = 90°, β = 95.081(3)°, γ = 90°, V = 1262.7(3) ų, Z = 4, and D = 1.915 g/cm³. The compound consists of a quinazolinone ring with phenol and iodine substituents. For both I and II , the short intramolecular O–H…N and two long intermolecular N–H…O hydrogen bonds are highly effective in holding the molecular system in a stable state. (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Crystal structure and optical properties of 4‐nitrophenyl 4‐butoxybenzoate

The title compound, C₁₇H₁₇N₁O₅, has been synthesized and characterized by single crystal X‐ray analysis and UV‐Vis spectra. The crystals are monoclinic, P 2₁/c, a = 17.994 (5) Å, b = 4.0592 (9) Å, c = 21.625 (5) Å, β = 99.634 (5)°, V = 1557.2 (6) ų and Z = 4. The molecule has an almost stretched form with a molecular length of 17.505 Å and an imbricated structure known for liquid crystals. The structure contains no direction‐specific intermolecular interactions like aromatic π‐π stacking and C‐H… π(arene) other than two weak C‐H…O hydrogen bonds. Good optical transmittance in the entire visible region of the UV‐Vis spectrum suggests that it is a potential candidate for optoelectronic applications. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Crystal structure of 4‐(1‐methyl‐1‐mesitylcyclobutane‐3‐yl)‐2‐aminothiazole

The crystal structure of 4‐(1‐methyl‐1‐mesitylcyclobutane‐3‐yl)‐2‐aminothiazole (C₁₇H₂₂N₂S₁) has been determined by X‐ray crystallographic techniques. The compound crystallizes in the triclinic space group P‐1 with Z = 6. The crystal structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full‐matrix least squares to a final R‐value of 0.052 for 2298 observed reflections [I > 2σ ( I ) ]. There are three crystallographically independent molecules, I, II and III. These molecules are held together by intermolecular N‐H...N hydrogen bonds. © 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim     

Crystal structures of N1, N5‐dibenzoyltetrahydro‐4‐methyl‐1, 5‐benzodiazepin‐2‐one (DBTBO) and tetrahydro‐4‐methyl‐1, 5‐benzodiazepin‐2‐one (TBO)

Adducing structural analogies between the two fused systems, N1, N5‐Dibenzoyltetrahydro‐4‐methyl‐1,5‐benzodiazepin‐2‐one, C₂₄H₂₀N₂O₃ (DBTBO CCDC 200341) and Tetrahydro‐4‐methyl‐1,5‐benzodiazepin‐2‐one, C₁₀H₁₂ N₂O (TBO CCDC 200342) helps to find the pharmacological differences from the view point of variant hetero atom substitutions in the hetero cycle. Both the diazepines crystallized in identical monoclinic space group P2₁/n with a = 14.1134(1) Å, b = 9.2444(1) Å, c = 16.3812(1) Å; β = 107.11(1)º, V = 2042.7(3) ų for DBTBO and a = 9.3363(7) Å, b = 10.4895(8) Å, c = 9.9852(7) Å, β = 91.314(1)º, V = 977.62(1) ų for TBO, respectively. The two structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full‐matrix least‐squares procedure to final R‐values of R1 = 0.0575(DBTBO) and R1 = 0.0984(TBO). Structural differences include non‐identical boat conformations of these seven‐membered rings and the different non‐bonding interactions in the benzodiazepine pair.     

Synthesis and crystal structure determination of 6,7‐dihydro‐2‐methoxy‐4‐(substituted)‐5H ‐benzo[6,7]cyclohepta[1,2‐b ]pyridine‐3‐carbonitrile

The compounds 6,7‐dihydro‐2‐methoxy‐4‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5H ‐benzo[6.7]cyclohepta[1,2‐b ]pyridine‐3‐carbonitrile (compound IIIa) and 4‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐6,7‐dihydro‐2‐methoxy‐5H ‐benzo[6,7]cyclohepta[1,2‐b ]pyridine‐3‐carbonitrile (compound IIIb) were synthesized and their structures have been determined from three dimensional X‐ray data using direct method and refined by full matrix least squares with anisotropic thermal parameters for non‐hydrogen atoms to conventional R(gt) of 0.036 and 0.038 for the two compounds respectively. For compound (IIIa) the crystals are monoclinic, space group C_c, with a=11.2909 (5) Å, b=17.7755(8) Å, c=9.1437(4) Å and β=95.428(3)°, while the crystals of the second compound (IIIb) are triclinic, space group P1, with a=8.7465(3)Å, b=10.3958(3)Å, c=10.9011(4)Å, α= 108.3870(10)°, β=101.3741(12)°, γ=97.9594(12)°. The molecular structure of the two compounds have nearly the same configuration, where the cyclohepta ring takes the boat shape and the methoxy and the carbonitrile groups are attached at the same position C₂ and C₈. The difference occurs only at the position C₄, where the substituent is methylphenyl for compound (IIIa) and chlorophenyl for the other. The bond lengths, valency angles and the hydrogen bonding were calculated and fully discussed. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Growth and characterization of 4‐(2‐hydroxyphenylamino)‐pent‐3‐en‐2‐one single crystals

4‐(2‐hydroxyphenylamino)‐pent‐3‐en‐2‐one (HPAP) was synthesized and single crystals were grown by the solution growth technique using methanol as a solvent. The crystals having orthorhombic symmetry were characterized by single crystal XRD, FTIR spectroscopy, NMR spectroscopy, TGA, DSC and dielectric studies. Very less variation in the value of dielectric constant is found for different frequencies of applied field. The crystals were exhibiting positive photoconductivity and poor NLO responses. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Analysis of the crystal structures of 1,3‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,3,2‐diazasilol‐2‐ylidene and 1,3‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,2‐dichloro‐1,3‐diaza‐2‐sila‐4‐cyclopentene

The crystal structures of the title compounds, 1,3‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,3,2‐diazasilol‐2‐ylidene, C₁₀H₂₀N₂Si ( 1 ) and 1,3‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,2‐dichloro‐1,3‐diaza‐2‐sila‐4‐cyclopentene, C₁₀H₂₀N₂SiCl2 ( 3 ) were solved and are reported. Compound ( 1 ) crystallized in space group P mmn and each molecule has a mirror plane, which bisects the C‐C backbone of the N‐C‐C‐N framework. Compound ( 1 ) was also found to have a 2‐fold twin component. In compound ( 3 ) the space group P 2₁/m results with the mirror plane passing through the N‐C‐C‐N backbone. We compare these structures with the gas phase determination previously reported for ( 1 ) and the incomplete single crystal data for ( 3 ). (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Crystal and molecular structure of 1‐allyl‐5‐(4‐methylbenzoyl)‐4‐(4‐methylphenyl)pyrimidine‐2(1H)‐thione

The crystal structure of 1‐allyl‐5‐(4‐methylbenzoyl)‐4‐(4‐methylphenyl)pyrimidine‐2(1H)‐thione (C₂₂H₂₀N₂OS) has been determined from three dimensional single crystal X‐ray diffraction data. The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2₁/c, with a = 10.6674(13), b = 10.1077(7), c = 17.9467(19) Å, β = 98.460(9)°, V = 1914.0(3) ų, D_calc = 1.251 g cm^–3, Z = 4. In the title compound, the allyl group shows positional disorder. Molecules are linked by C‐H···O, C‐H···N and C‐H···S intermolecular interactions forming two‐dimensional network. (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

The Crystal and Molecular Structure of tert‐Butoxycarbonyl ‐ α‐aminoisobutyryl ‐ isoleucyl ‐methylester

The crystal structure of the synthetic peptide Boc — Aib — Ile ‐ OMe (C₁₆ H₃ 0 N₂ O₅ ) has been determined from three‐dimensional X — ray diffraction data. The peptide crystallizes in triclinic space group P1 with a = 9.570(9), b = 10.261(7), c = 10.610(2) Å , α = 101.9(0), β = 91.7(0), γ = 98.6(0)° V = 1006.1(12) ų, Z = 2, D_calc = 1.09 Mg m^‐3. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full‐matrix least‐squares method to an R value of 0.072 (λ = 1.5418Å). The conformation of Aib residue in molecule A is αL and in molecule B is αR. The Ile residue in molecule A adopts folded conformation, while in molecule B it is in the extended region. The peptide units are trans and show significant deviations from planarity.     

Crystal structure of N‐[(1Z)‐1‐(3‐methyl‐3‐phenylcyclobutyl)‐2‐thiomorpholin‐4‐ylethylidene] thiourea

The crystal structure of N‐[(1Z)‐1‐(3‐methyl‐3‐phenylcyclobutyl)‐2‐thiomorpholin‐4‐ylethylidene] thiourea (C₁₈H₂₆N₄S₂) has been determined by X‐ray crystallographic techniques. The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbca, with unit cell parameters: a = 15.692(3), b = 20.803(8), c = 11.979(6)Å, Z = 8, V = 3911(7)ų. The crystal structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full‐matrix least squares to a final R‐value of 0.084 for 1447 observed reflections [I > 2σ ( I ) ]. In the thiosemicarbazide moiety, the S = C bond length is 1.656(6), N‐C‐N angle is 115.6(5)°. The crystal structure is stabilized by the intermolecular N‐H...S hydrogen bonds. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Crystallographic Investigations of 3β‐acetoxy‐5α‐cholestan‐6‐one‐semicarbazone ‐ A Steroid

The crystal structure of 3b‐acetoxy‐5a‐cholestan‐6‐one‐semicarbazone (C₃₀H₅₁O₃N₃) has been determined by X‐ray diffraction methods. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁ with cell parameters a = 11.641(1), b = 16.552(1) c = 31.181(4) Å and Z = 8. The structure has been refined to an R‐value of 0.050 for 4407 observed reflections. Two molecules in the asymmetric unit have been observed. In both the crystallographically independent molecules, all the three six‐membered rings (A, B and C ) of steroid nucleus exist in chair conformation, while the five‐ membered ring D exists in 13β distorted‐envelope in molecule‐I and 13β, 14α half‐chair conformation in molecule‐II. Three intermolecular N‐H … O hydrogen bonds have been observed.