Polymer Architectures via Reversible Addition Fragmentation Chain Transfer (RAFT) Polymerization

Various versatile chain transfer agents (CTAs) have been synthesized for reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerzation. Such CTAs have been used to modify hydroxyl containing materials and produce well-controlled molecular architectures such as amphiphilic copolymer from poly (ethylene glycol), AB block copolymer consisting of a biodegradable segment, poly (l-lactic acid) (PLLA) and grafted copolymers of poly (styrene), poly (methyl methacrylate) and poly (methyl acrylate) from cellulose.     

Kinetic Analysis of Reversible Addition Fragmentation Chain Transfer (RAFT) Polymerizations: Conditions for Inhibition,Retardation, and Optimum Living Polymerization

Careful simulations of conversion vs. time plots and full molecular weight distributions have been performed using the PREDICI® program package in conjunction with the kinetic scheme suggested by the CSIRO group for the reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) process to probe RAFT agent mediated polymerizations. In particular, conditions leading to inhibition and rate retardation have been examined to act as a guide to optimum living polymerization behavior. It is demonstrated that an inhibition period of considerable length is induced by either slow fragmentation of the intermediate RAFT radicals appearing in the pre‐equilibrium or by slow re‐initiation of the leaving group radical of the initial RAFT agent. The absolute values of the rate coefficients governing the core equilibrium of the RAFT process – at a fixed value of the equilibrium constant – are confirmed to be crucial in controlling the polydispersity of the resulting molecular weight distributions: A higher interchange frequency effects narrower distributions. It is further demonstrated that the size of the rate coefficient controlling the addition reaction of propagating radicals to polyRAFT agent, k_β, is mainly responsible for optimizing the control of the polymerization. The fragmentation rate coefficient, k_–β, of the macroRAFT intermediate radical, on the other hand, may be varied over orders of magnitude without affecting the amount of control exerted over the polymerization. On the basis of the basic RAFT mechanism, its value mainly governs the extent of rate retardation in RAFT polymerizations.     

A Critical Survey of Dithiocarbamate Reversible Addition‐Fragmentation Chain Transfer (RAFT) Agents in Radical Polymerization

This article provides a critical review of the properties, synthesis, and applications of dithiocarbamates Z′Z″NC(=S)SR as mediators in reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. These are among the most versatile RAFT agents. Through choice of substituents on nitrogen (Z′, Z″), the polymerization of most monomer types can be controlled to provide living characteristics (i.e., low dispersities, high end‐group fidelity, and access to complex architectures). These include the more activated monomers (MAMs; e.g., styrenes and acrylates) and the less activated monomers (LAMs; e.g., vinyl esters and vinylamides). Dithiocarbamates with balanced activity (e.g., 1H‐pyrazole‐1‐carbodithioates) or switchable RAFT agents [e.g., a N‐methyl‐N‐(4‐pyridinyl)dithiocarbamate] allow control MAMs and LAMs with a single RAFT agent and provide a pathway to low‐dispersity poly(MAM)‐block‐poly(LAM). © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2019 , 57, 216–227     

RAFTing down under: Tales of missing radicals,fancy architectures,and mysterious holes

This highlight describes recent developments in reversible addition–fragmentation transfer (RAFT) polymerization. Succinct coverage of the RAFT mechanism is supplemented by details of synthetic methodologies for making a wide range of architectures ranging from stars to combs, microgels, and blocks. In addition, RAFT reactions in different media such as emulsion and ionic liquids receive attention. Finally, a specific example of a novel material design is briefly introduced, whereas polymers prepared via RAFT are adopted for microporous/honeycomb membrane design. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 365–375, 2003     

Controlled,radical reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer polymerization in high‐surfactant‐concentration ionic miniemulsions

Living free‐radical polymerization of methacrylate and styrenic monomers with ionic surfactants was carried out with reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer in miniemulsion with different surfactant types and concentrations. The previously reported problem of phase separation was found to be insignificant at higher surfactant concentrations, and control of the molar mass and polydispersity index was superior to that of published miniemulsion systems. Cationic and anionic surfactants were used to examine the validity of the argument that ionic surfactants interfere with transfer agents. Ionic surfactants were suitable for miniemulsion polymerization under certain conditions. The colloidal stability of the miniemulsions was consistent with the predictions of a specific model. The living character of the polymer that comprised the latex material was shown by its transformation into block copolymers. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 960–974, 2004     

Continuous Reversible Addition‐Fragmentation Chain Transfer Polymerization in Miniemulsion Utilizing a Multi‐Tube Reaction System

Summary: A unique, multi‐tube, continuous reactor has been successfully designed and implemented for the study of reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) in miniemulsions. Data collection is greatly enhanced by the ability to simultaneously collect samples at five different residence times. The results of a styrene homopolymerization show that kinetically, the reactor exhibits similar behavior to a batch reaction. Number‐average molecular weights increased linearly with conversion, typical of living polymerizations.

The number‐average molecular weight of the polymers produced in the tubular reactor increased linearly with conversion, indicative of a controlled polymerization.     

Experimental Requirements for an Efficient Control of Free‐Radical Polymerizations via the Reversible Addition‐Fragmentation Chain Transfer (RAFT) Process

Summary: Reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization is a recent and very versatile controlled radical polymerization technique that has enabled the synthesis of a wide range of macromolecules with well‐defined structures, compositions, and functionalities. The RAFT process is based on a reversible addition‐fragmentation reaction mediated by thiocarbonylthio compounds used as chain transfer agents (CTAs). A great variety of CTAs have been designed and synthesized so far with different kinds of substituents. In this review, all of the CTAs encountered in the literature from 1998 to date are reported and classified according to several criteria : i) the structure of their substituents, ii) the various monomers that they have been polymerized with, and iii) the type of polymerization that has been performed (solution, dispersed media, surface initiated, and copolymerization). Moreover, the influence of various parameters is discussed, especially the CTA structure relative to the monomer and the experimental conditions (temperature, pressure, initiation, CTA/initiator ratio, concentration), in order to optimise the kinetics and the efficiency of the molecular‐weight‐distribution control.

Schematic of the RAFT polymerization.     

Stimuli-responsive star polymers

Stimuli-responsive star polymers gain more and more interest over the last decades due to their unique properties compared to their linear counterparts. The branched structure for instance has influence on the responsive behavior of these polymers. This review offers an overview of stimuli-responsive star polymers generated by different polymerization techniques, e.g. anionic and controlled radical polymerization (CRP). Beside conventional branched homopolymers different other types like block copolymers, miktoarm star copolymers, core crosslinked star polymers (CCS) and comb polymers are also presented. Furthermore their responsive behavior in solution or immobilized on a substrate, and their applications are outlined. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 2980–2994     

A Strategy for Synthesis of Ion‐Bonded Supramolecular Star Polymers by Reversible Addition‐Fragmentation Chain Transfer (RAFT) Polymerization

We have developed a novel strategy for the preparation of ion‐bonded supramolecular star polymers by RAFT polymerization. An ion‐bonded star supramolecule with six functional groups was prepared from a triphenylene derivative containing tertiary amino groups and trithiocarbonate carboxylic acid, and used as the RAFT agent in polymerizations of tert‐butyl acrylate (tBA) and styrene (St). Molecular weights and structures of the polymers were characterized by ¹H NMR and GPC. The results show that the polymerization possesses the character of living free‐radical polymerization and the ion‐bonded supramolecular star polymers PSt, PtBA, and PSt‐b‐PtBA, with six well‐defined arms, were successfully synthesized.

     

From NMP to RAFT and Thiol‐Ene Chemistry by In Situ Functionalization of Nitroxide Chain Ends

A straightforward, novel strategy based on the in situ functionalization of polymers prepared by nitroxide‐mediated polymerization (NMP), for the use as an extension toward block copolymers and post‐polymerization modifications, has been investigated. The nitroxide end group is exchanged for a thiocarbonylthio end group by a rapid transfer reaction with bis(thiobenzoyl) disulfide to generate in situ reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) macroinitiators. Moreover, not only have these macroinitiators been used in chain extension and block copolymerization experiments by the RAFT process but also a thiol‐terminated polymer is synthesized by aminolysis of the RAFT end group and subsequently reacted with dodecyl vinyl ether by thiol‐ene chemistry.     

Living free‐radical polymerization of styrene under a constant source of γ radiation

Living polymerization of styrene was observed using γ radiation as a source of initiation and 1‐phenylethyl phenyldithioacetate as a reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agent. The γ radiation had little or no detrimental effect on the RAFT agent, with the molecular weight of the polymer increasing linearly with conversion (up to the maximum measured conversions of 30%). The polymerization had kinetics (polym.) consistent with those of a living polymerization (first order in monomer) and proportional to the square root of the radiation‐dose rate. This initiation technique may facilitate the grafting of narrow polydispersity, well‐defined polymers onto existing polymer surfaces as well as allow a wealth of kinetic experiments using the constant radical flux generated by γ radiation. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 19–25, 2002     

Preparation and characterization of heteroarm H‐shaped terpolymers by combination of reversible addition‐fragmentation transfer polymerization and ring‐opening polymerization

Heteroarm H‐shaped terpolymers, [(poly(L ‐lactide))(polystyrene)]poly(ethylene oxide)[(polystyrene)(poly(L ‐lactide))], [(PLLA)(PS)]PEO[(PS)(PLLA)], in which PEO acts as a main chain and PS and PLLA as side arms, have been successfully prepared via combination of reversible addition–fragmentation transfer (RAFT) polymerization and ring‐opening polymerization (ROP). The first step is the synthesis of the PEO capped with one terminal dithiobenzoate group and one hydroxyl group at every chain end, [(HOCH₂)(PhC(S)S)]PEO[(S(S)CPh)(CH₂OH)] from the reaction of carboxylic acid with ethylene oxide. Then, the RAFT polymerization of styrene (St) was carried out using [(HOCH₂)(PhC(S)S)]PEO[(S(S)CPh)(CH₂OH)] as RAFT agent and AIBN as initiator, and the triblock copolymer, [(HOCH₂)(PS)]PEO[(PS)(CH₂OH)], was formed. Finally, the heteroarm H‐shaped terpolymers, [(PLLA)(PS)]PEO[(PS)(PLLA)], were produced by ROP of LLA, using triblock copolymer, [(HOCH₂)(PS)]PEO[(PS)(CH₂OH)], as macroinitiator and Sn(Oct)₂ as catalyst. The target products and intermediates were characterized by ¹H NMR spectroscopy and gel permeation chromatography. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 789–799, 2007     

Thermoresponsive Block Copolymer–Protein Conjugates Prepared by Grafting‐from via RAFT Polymerization

Well‐defined “smart” block copolymer–protein conjugates were prepared by two consecutive “grafting‐from” reactions via reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. The initiating portion (R‐group) of the RAFT agent was anchored to a model protein such that the thiocarbonylthio moiety was readily accessible for chain transfer with propagating chains in solution. Well‐defined polymer‐protein conjugates of poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were prepared at room temperature in aqueous media. The retained trithiocarbonate moiety on the free end group of the immobilized polymer allowed the homopolymer conjugate to be extended by polymerization of N,N‐dimethylacrylamide. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, size exclusion chromatography, and NMR spectroscopy confirmed the synthesis of the various conjugates and revealed that the polymerizations were well controlled. As expected, the resulting block copolymer–protein conjugates demonstrated thermoresponsive behavior due to the temperature‐sensitivity of the PNIPAM block, as evidenced by turbidity measurements and dynamic light scattering analysis.

     

Reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer graft polymerization of styrene: Solid phases for organic and peptide synthesis

The γ‐initiated reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer (RAFT)‐agent‐mediated free‐radical graft polymerization of styrene onto a polypropylene solid phase has been performed with cumyl phenyldithioacetate (CPDA). The initial CPDA concentrations range between 1 × 10^?2 and 2 × 10^?3 mol L^?1 with dose rates of 0.18, 0.08, 0.07, 0.05, and 0.03 kGy h^?1. The RAFT graft polymerization is compared with the conventional free‐radical graft polymerization of styrene onto polypropylene. Both processes show two distinct regimes of grafting: (1) the grafting layer regime, in which the surface is not yet totally covered with polymer chains, and (2) a regime in which a second polymer layer is formed. Here, we hypothesize that the surface is totally covered with polymer chains and that new polymer chains are started by polystyrene radicals from already grafted chains. The grafting ratio of the RAFT‐agent‐mediated process is controlled via the initial CPDA concentration. The molecular weight of the polystyrene from the solution (PS_free) shows a linear behavior with conversion and has a low polydispersity index. Furthermore, the loading of the grafted solid phase shows a linear relationship with the molecular weight of PS_free for both regimes. Regime 2 has a higher loading capacity per molecular weight than regime 1. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 4180–4192, 2002     

RAFT polymerization kinetics and polymer characterization of P3HT rod–coil block copolymers

Here an in‐depth analysis of reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization kinetics is reported in order to provide better definition of poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (P3HT) rod–coil block copolymers thru a more thorough understanding of the RAFT polymerization of the coil block. To this end, a new P3HT macroRAFT agent is synthesized and utilized to prepare rod–coil block copolymers with P3HT and poly(styrene), poly(tert‐butylacrylate), and poly(4‐vinylpyridine), and the RAFT polymerization kinetics of each system are fully detailed. This is achieved by a comprehensive analysis of characterization data from ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, and matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight spectroscopy, which are used as complementary techniques in order to address difficulties in accurately characterizing the synthesized polymer systems. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 3575–3585     

Narrowly Distributed Dendronized Polymethacrylates by Reversible Addition‐Fragmentation Chain Transfer (RAFT) Polymerization

Summary: RAFT is applied to the dendronized macromonomers of the first and second generation, 1 and 2 , respectively. Good results are obtained in the presence of AIBN as radical initiator, with compound 6 as mediator and at mediator to monomer ratios of 2:200 for monomer 1 ( = 320 000, PDI = 1.24) and monomer 2 ( = 178 000, PDI = 1.20). The common characteristics of a controlled polymerization are reasonably met. The more sterically demanding G2 monomer 2 requires higher polymerization temperatures.

     

Kinetics of methyl methacrylate and n‐butyl acrylate copolymerization mediated by 2‐cyanoprop‐2‐yl dithiobenzoate as a RAFT agent

The RAFT (co)polymerization kinetics of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and n‐butyl acrylate (BA) mediated by 2‐cyanoprop‐2‐yl dithiobenzoate was studied with various RAFT concentrations and monomer compositions. The homopolymerization of MMA gave the highest rate. Increasing the BA fraction f_BA dramatically decreased the copolymerization rate. The rate reached the lowest point at f_MMA ～ 0.2. This observation is in sharp contrast to the conventional RAFT‐free copolymerization, where BA homopolymerization gave the highest rate and the copolymerization rate decreased monotonously with increasing f_MMA. This peculiar phenomenon can be explained by the RAFT retardation effect. The RAFT copolymerization rate can be described by 〈R_p〉/〈R_p〉₀ = (1 + 2(〈k_c〉/〈k_t〉)〈K〉)[RAFT]₀)^?0.5, where 〈R_p〉₀ is the RAFT‐free copolymerization rate and 〈K〉 is the apparent addition–fragmentation equilibrium coefficient. A theoretical expression of 〈K〉 based on a terminal model of addition and fragmentation reactions was derived and successfully applied to predict the RAFT copolymerization kinetics with the rate parameters obtained from the homopolymerization systems. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 3098–3111, 2007     

Facile Fabrication of Water Dispersible Latex Particles with Homogeneous or Chain‐Segregated Surface from RAFT Polymerization Using a Mixture of Two Macromolecular Chain Transfer Agents

Water dispersible latex particles with randomly mixed shells or chain segregated surface are synthesized from one‐pot reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer heterogeneous polymerization of benzyl methacrylate (BzMA) using a mixture of poly(glycerol monomethacrylate) (PGMA) and poly(2,3‐bis(succinyloxy)propyl methacrylate) (PBSPMA) macromolecular chain transfer agents. In methanol, the two in situ synthesized PGMA‐b‐PBzMA and PBSPMA‐b‐PBzMA diblock copolymers coaggregate into spherical micelles, which contain PBzMA core and discrete PGMA and PBSPMA nanodomains on the shell. In contrast, in water–methanol mixture (V/V = 9/1), latex particles with homogeneous distribution of PGMA and PBSPMA polymer chains on the shell are obtained. The reasons leading to formation of latex particles with homogenous or chain‐segregated surface are discussed, and polymerization kinetics and physical state of PBSPMA in methanol and water–methanol mixtures are ascribed. These polymeric micelles with patterned functional group on the surface are potentially important for application in supracolloidal hierarchical assemblies and catalysis.

     

Characterization and rheological properties of model alkali‐soluble rheology modifiers synthesized by reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer polymerization

Model alkali‐soluble rheology modifiers of different molar masses were synthesized by the reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer polymerization of methyl methacrylate, methacrylic acid, and two different associative macromonomers. The polymerization kinetics showed good living character including well‐controlled molar mass, molar mass linearly increasing with conversion, and the ability to chain‐extend by forming an AB block copolymer. The steady‐shear and dynamic properties of a core‐shell emulsion, thickened with the different model alkali‐soluble rheology modifiers, were measured at constant pH and temperature. The steady‐shear data for latex solutions with conventional rheology modifiers exhibited the expected thickening, whereas the associative rheology modifiers showed contrasting rheology behavior. The dynamic measurements revealed that the latex solutions thickened with the conventional rheology modifiers exhibit solid‐like (dominant G′) behavior as compared with the associative rheology modifiers that give the latex solution a liquid‐like (dominant G″) character. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 223–235, 2003