Exploring the structural landscape of 2‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)‐1,3‐benzothiazole: high‐Z′ packing polymorphism and cocrystallization with calix[4]tube

We report here for the first time a cocrystal of the so‐called neutral calix[4]tube, which is two tail‐to‐tail‐arranged and partially deprotonated tetrakis(carboxymethoxy)calix[4]arenes, including three sodium ions, with 2‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)‐1,3‐benzothiazole, namely trisodium bis(carboxymethoxy)bis(carboxylatomethoxy)calix[4]arene tris(carboxymethoxy)(carboxylatomethoxy)calix[4]arene–2‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)‐1,3‐benzothiazole–dimethyl sulfoxide–water (1/1/2/2), 3Na⁺·C₃₆H₃₀O₁₂^2?·C₃₆H₃₁O₁₂^?·C₁₁H₇NS₂·2C₂H₆OS·2H₂O, which provides a new approach into the host–guest chemistry of inclusion complexes. Three packing polymorphs of the same benzothiazole with high Z′ (one with Z′ = 8 and two with Z′ = 4) were also discovered in the course of our desired cocrystallization. The inspection of these polymorphs and a previously known polymorph with Z′ = 2 revealed that Z′ increases as the strength of intermolecular contacts decreases. Also, these results expand the frontier of invoking calixarenes as a host for nonsolvent small molecules, besides providing knowledge on the rare formation of high‐Z′ packing polymorphs of simple molecules, such as the target benzothiazole.     

Conformational Polymorphism in Racemic 2,4-Di-<Emphasis Type="Italic">o</Emphasis>-Benzoyl-6-<Emphasis Type="Italic">o</Emphasis>-Tosyl <Emphasis Type="Italic">myo</Emphasis>-Inositol 1,3,5-Orthoacetate

The title compound, C₂₉H₂₆O₁₀S, yields two conformational polymorphs concomitantly from dichloromethane-methanol mixture; the major polymorph grows as plates (Form I, monoclinic, P2₁/n) and the minor polymorph grows as needles (Form II, triclinic, P-1). The two forms differ mainly in orientation of the tosyl group. In Form I, sulfonyl oxygen of the tosyl group makes intermolecular C −H…O interactions, whereas the same group in Form II is involved in an intramolecular short dipolar S=O…C=O (sulfonyl-carbonyl) contact. The molecular organization and the influence of various weak non-covalent interactions that stabilize these conformers in the crystal lattices are discussed.     

Two polymorphs of 2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐4‐methylchromenium perchlorate

Crystallization (from ethyl acetate solution) of 2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐4‐methylchromenium perchlorate, C₁₆H₁₂ClO⁺·;ClO₄⁻, (I), yields two monoclinic polymorphs with the space groups P2₁/n [polymorph (Ia)] and P2₁/c [polymorph (Ib)]; in both cases, Z = 4. Cations and anions, disordered in polymorph (Ib), form ion pairs in both polymorphs as a result of Cl—O...π interactions. Related by a centre of symmetry, neighbouring ion pairs in polymorph (Ia) are linked viaπ–π interactions between cationic fragments, and the resulting dimers are linked through a network of C—H...O(perchlorate) interactions between adjacent cations and anions. The ion pairs in polymorph (Ib), arranged in pairs of columns along the a axis, are linked through a network of C—H...O(perchlorate), C—Cl...π, π–π and C—Cl...O(perchlorate) interactions. The aromatic skeletons in polymorph (Ia) are parallel in the cationic fragments involved in dimers, but nonparallel in adjacent ion pairs not constituting dimers. In polymorph (Ib), these skeletons are parallel in pairs of columns, but nonparallel in adjacent pairs of columns; this is visible as a herring‐bone pattern. Differences in the crystal structures of the polymorphs are most probably the cause of their different colours.     

A comparative study of two polymorphs of bis(1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium) carbonate

Alkanolamines have been known for their high CO₂ absorption for over 60 years and are used widely in the natural gas industry for reversible CO₂ capture. In an attempt to crystallize a salt of (RS)‐2‐(3‐benzoylphenyl)propionic acid with 2‐amino‐2‐methylpropan‐1‐ol, we obtained instead a polymorph (denoted polymorph II) of bis(1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium) carbonate, 2C₄H₁₂NO⁺·CO₃²⁻, (I), suggesting that the amine group of the former compound captured CO₂ from the atmosphere forming the aminium carbonate salt. This new polymorph was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis at low temperature (100 K). The salt crystallizes in the monoclinic system (space group C2/c, Z = 4), while a previously reported form of the same salt (denoted polymorph I) crystallizes in the triclinic system (space group P, Z = 2) [Barzagli et al. (2012). ChemSusChem, 5 , 1724–1731]. The asymmetric unit of polymorph II contains one 1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium cation and half a carbonate anion, located on a twofold axis, while the asymmetric unit of polymorph I contains two cations and one anion. These polymorphs exhibit similar structural features in their three‐dimensional packing. Indeed, similar layers of an alternating cation–anion–cation neutral structure are observed in their molecular arrangements. Within each layer, carbonate anions and 1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium cations form planes bound to each other through N—H…O and O—H…O hydrogen bonds. In both polymorphs, the layers are linked to each other via van der Waals interactions and C—H…O contacts. In polymorph II, a highly directional C—H…O contact (C—H…O = 156°) shows as a hydrogen‐bonding interaction. Periodic theoretical density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicate that both polymorphs present very similar stabilities.     

Crystal structures of two polymorphic forms of DOTAM‐mono‐acid dihydrate

The structural chemistry of 2‐[4,7,10‐tris(carbamoylmethyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecan‐1‐yl]acetic acid dihydrate, C₁₆H₃₁N₇O₅·2H₂O, is described. The macrocyclic compound, also known by the abbreviation DOTAM‐mono‐acid, crystallized at room temperature and was isolated concomitantly as two polymorphic forms. The structures of both polymorphs were determined at 90 K. The first polymorph crystallized as a zwitterionic dihydrate [systematic name: 4,7,10‐tris(carbamoylmethyl)‐1‐(carboxylatomethyl)‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecan‐1‐ium dihydrate] in the space group P2₁/n, with Z′ = 1. The second polymorph crystallized as a zwitterionic dihydrate in the space group P2₁ at 90 K, with Z′ = 2. The two independent molecules are related by a local center. In each polymorph, the zwitterion is formed between the negatively‐charged carboxylate group and the ring N atom that bears the acetate pendant arm. Extensive inter‐ and intramolecular hydrogen bonding exists in both polymorphic structures. In polymorph 1, an intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding network propagating parallel to the a direction creates an infinite chain. A second hydrogen‐bonding network is observed through a water molecule of hydration in the b direction. Polymorph 2 also has two intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding networks. One propagates parallel to the a direction, while the other propagates in the [10] direction. Increasing the temperature of polymorph 2 yields the same structure at T = 180 K, but the pseudocenter becomes exact at 299 K. The higher‐temperature structure has Z′ = 1 in the space group P2₁/c.     

Transitions among five polymorphs of chlorpropamide near the melting point

Five polymorphs of chlorpropamide (α, β, δ, γ, and ε) were investigated near the melting point by using DSC. Structure of samples was tested by X-ray powder diffraction. Four first polymorphs were found to transform into ε-polymorph, which melts at T _m=128°C, Δ_m H=24 kJ mol⁻¹. Enthalpy of the polymorph transitions ranges from +3 kJ mol⁻¹ for α→ε to −0.8 kJ mol⁻¹ for β→ε. Structure of three first polymorphs was published elsewhere, and the structure of δ-polymorph is published for the first time. XRPD patterns for all polymorphs are reported, together with the atomic coordinates for the δ-polymorph.     

Polymorphs of the antiviral drug ganciclovir

Ganciclovir (GCV; systematic name: 2‐amino‐9‐{[(1,3‐dihydroxypropan‐2‐yl)oxy]methyl}‐6,9‐dihydro‐1H‐purin‐6‐one), C₉H₁₃N₅O₄, an antiviral drug for treating cytomegalovirus infections, has two known polymorphs (Forms I and II), but only the structure of the metastable Form II has been reported [Kawamura & Hirayama (2009). X‐ray Struct. Anal. Online , 25 , 51–52]. We describe a successful preparation of GCV Form I and its crystal structure. GCV is an achiral molecule in the sense that its individual conformers, which are generally chiral objects, undergo fast interconversion in the liquid state and cannot be isolated. In the crystalline state, GCV exists as two inversion‐related conformers in Form I and as a single chiral conformer in Form II. This situation is similar to that observed for glycine, also an achiral molecule, whose α‐polymorph contains two inversion‐related conformers, while the γ‐polymorph contains a single conformer that is chiral. The hydrogen bonds are exclusively intermolecular in Form I, but both inter‐ and intramolecular in Form II, which accounts for the different molecular conformations in the two polymorphs.     

Influence of protonation on the geometry of 2-{[(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)ethyl]amino}-1-phenylethan-1-ol: crystal structures of the free base and of its chloride and 3-hydroxybenzoate salt forms

The aroxyalkylaminoalcohol derivatives are a group of compounds known for their pharmacological action. The crystal structures of four new xylenoxyaminoalcohol derivatives having anticonvulsant activity are reported, namely, 2-{[2-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)ethyl]amino}-1-phenylethan-1-ol, C₁₈H₂₃NO₂, 1 , the salt N-[2-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)ethyl]-1-hydroxy-1-phenylethan-2-aminium 3-hydroxybenzoate, C₁₈H₂₄NO₂⁺·C₇H₅O₃^?, 2 , and two polymorphs of the salt (R)-N-[2-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)ethyl]-1-hydroxy-1-phenylethan-2-aminium chloride, C₁₈H₂₄NO₂⁺·Cl^?, 3 and 3p . Both polymorphs crystallize in the space group P2₁2₁2 and each has two cations and two anions in the asymmetric unit (Z′ = 2). The molecules in the polymorphs show differences in their molecular conformations and intermolecular interactions. The crystal packing of neutral 1 is dominated by intermolecular O—H…N hydrogen bonds, resulting in the formation of one-dimensional chains. In the crystal structures of the salt forms ( 2 , 3 and 3p ), each protonated N atom is engaged in a charge-assisted hydrogen bond with the corresponding anion. The protonation of the N atom also influences the conformation of the molecular linker between the two aromatic rings and changes the orientation of the rings. The crystal packing of the salt forms is dominated by intermolecular O—H…O hydrogen bonds, resulting in the creation of chains and rings. Structural studies have been enriched by the calculation of Hirshfeld surfaces and the corresponding fingerprint plots.     

Conformational polymorphism in a cobalt(II) dithiocarbamate complex

Two conformational polymorphs of (N,N‐dibutyldithiocarbamato‐κ²S,S′)[tris(3,5‐diphenylpyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN²)hydroborato]cobalt(II), [Co(C₄₅H₃₄BN₆)(C₉H₁₈NS₂)] or [Tp^Ph2Co(S₂CNBu₂)], 1 , are accessible by recrystallization from dichloromethane–methanol to give orthorhombic polymorph 1a , while slow evaporation from acetonitrile produces triclinic polymorph 1b . The two polymorphs have been characterized by IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography at 150 K. Polymorphs 1a and 1b crystallize in the orthorhombic space group Pbca and the triclinic space group P, respectively. The polymorphs have a trans ( 1a ) and cis ( 1b ) orientation of the butyl groups with respect to the S₂CN plane of the dithiocarbamate ligand, which results in an intermediate five‐coordinate geometry for 1a and a square‐pyramidal geometry for 1b . Hirshfeld surface analysis reveals minor differences between the two polymorphs, with 1a exhibiting stronger C—H…S interactions and 1b favouring C—H…π interactions.     

Two polymorphs of 2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐bis(dibenzylamino)‐p‐hydroquinone with flexible dibenzylamino groups

We obtained two conformational polymorphs of 2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐bis(dibenzylamino)‐p‐hydroquinone, C₃₄H₃₀Cl₂N₂O₂. Both polymorphs have an inversion centre at the centre of the hydroquinone ring (Z′ = ), and there are no significant differences between their bond lengths and angles. The most significant structural difference in the molecular conformations was found in the rotation of the phenyl rings of the two crystallographically independent benzyl groups. The crystal structures of the polymorphs were distinguishable with respect to the arrangement of the hydroquinone rings and the packing motif of the phenyl rings that form part of the benzyl groups. The phenyl groups of one polymorph are arranged in a face‐to‐edge motif between adjacent molecules, with intermolecular C—H…π interactions, whereas the phenyl rings in the other polymorph form a lamellar stacking pattern with no significant intermolecular interactions. We suggest that this partial conformational difference in the molecular structures leads to the significant structural differences observed in their molecular arrangements.     

Triclabendazole: An Intriguing Case of Co‐existence of Conformational and Tautomeric Polymorphism

The crystal polymorphism of the anthelmintic drug, triclabendazole ( TCB ), is described. Two anhydrates (Forms I and II), three solvates, and an amorphous form have been previously mentioned. This study reports the crystal structures of Forms I ( 1 ) and II ( 2 ). These structures illustrate the uncommon phenomenon of tautomeric polymorphism. TCB exists as two tautomers A and B. Form I (Z′=2) is composed of two molecules of tautomer A while Form II (Z′=1) contains a 1:1 mixture of A and B. The polymorphs are also characterized by using other solid‐state techniques (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), PXRD, FT‐IR, and NMR spectroscopy). Form I is the higher melting form (m.p.: 177 °C, ΔH_f=≈105±4 J g^?1) and is the more stable form at room temperature. Form II is the lower melting polymorph (m.p.: 166 °C, ΔH_f=≈86±3 J g^?1) and shows high kinetic stability on storage in comparison to the amorphous form but it transforms readily into Form I in a solution‐mediated process. Crystal structure analysis of co‐crystals 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 further confirms the existence of tautomeric polymorphism in TCB . In 3 and 11 , tautomer A is present whereas in 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 the TCB molecule exists wholly as tautomer B. The DFT calculations suggest that the optimized tautomers A and B have nearly the same energies. Single point energy calculations reveal that tautomer A (in Form I) exists in two low‐energy conformations, whereas in Form II both tautomers A and B exist in an unfavorable high‐energy conformation, stabilized by a five‐point dimer synthon. The structural and thermodynamic features of 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 are discussed in detail. Triclabendazole is an intriguing case in which tautomeric and conformational variations co‐exist in the polymorphs.     

Two three‐dimensional networks in two polymorphs of biphenyl‐4,4′‐diaminium bis(3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate) dihydrate

Two polymorphs of biphenyl‐4,4′‐diaminium bis(3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate) dihydrate, C₁₂H₁₄N₂²⁺·2C₇H₅O₆S⁻·2H₂O, have been obtained and crystallographically characterized. Polymorph (I) crystallizes in the space group P2₁/c with Z′ = 2 and polymorph (II) in the space group P with Z′ = 0.5. The benzidinium cation in (II) is located on a crystallographic inversion centre. In both (I) and (II), the sulfonic acid H atoms are transferred to the benzidine N atoms, forming dihydrated 1:2 molecular adducts (base–acid). In the crystal packings of (I) and (II), the component ions are linked into three‐dimensional networks by combinations of X—H...O (X = O, N and C) hydrogen bonds. In addition, π–π interactions are observed in (I) between inversion‐related benzene rings [centroid–centroid distances = 3.632 (2) and 3.627 (2) Å]. In order to simplify the complex three‐dimensional networks in (I) and (II), we also give their rationalized topological analyses.     

Studies on mono- and dinuclear bisoxime copper complexes with different coordination geometries

Two new mono- and dinuclear Cu(II) complexes, namely [CuL¹]·0.5H₂O (1) and [(Cu₂(L²)₂)(DMF)]·0.5DMF (2) (H₂L¹ = 1,2-bis{[(Z)-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazolidin-4(4H)-yl)(phenyl)]methylene-aminooxy}ethane; H₂L² = 1,3-bis{[(Z)-(3-methyl-5-oxo-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazolidin-4(4H)-yl)(phenyl)] methyleneaminooxy}propane), have been synthesized and characterized by X-ray crystallography. The unit cell of complex 1 contains two crystallographically independent but chemically identical [CuL¹] molecules and one crystalline water molecule, showing a slightly distorted square-planar coordination geometry and forming a wave-like pattern running along the a-axis via hydrogen bonding and π···π stacking interactions. Complex 2 has a dinuclear structure, comprising two Cu(II) atoms, two completely deprotonated phenolate bisoxime (L²)²⁻ moieties (in the form of enol), and both coordinated and hemi-crystalline DMF molecules. Complex 2 has square-planar and square-pyramidal geometries around the two copper centers, whose basic coordination planes are almost perpendicular and form an infinite three-dimensional supramolecular network structure involving intermolecular C–H···N, C–H···O, and C–H···π(Ph) hydrogen bonding and π···π stacking interactions of neighboring pyrazole rings.     

Polysulfonylamine. CLXXVIII Onium‐Salze des Benzol‐1,2‐di(sulfonyl)amins (HZ): Eine zweite Kristallform des Ammonium‐Salzes NH4Z·H2O und Kristallstruktur des Bis(triphenylphosphoranyliden)ammonium‐Salzes [Ph3PNPPh3]Z

Polysulfonylamines. CLXXVIII. Onium Salts of Benzene‐1,2‐di(sulfonyl)amine (HZ): A Second Crystal Form of the Ammonium Salt NH₄Z·H₂O and Crystal Structure of the Bis(triphenylphosphoranylidene)ammonium Salt [Ph₃PNPPh₃]Z A dimorphic form of NH₄Z·H₂O, where Z^? is N‐deprotonated ortho‐benzenedisulfonimide, has been obtained and structurally characterized (previously known form 1A : monoclinic, P2₁/c, Z′ = 1; new polymorph 1B : monoclinic, P2₁/n, Z′ = 1). Both structures are dominated by an abundance of classical hydrogen bonds N⁺–H/O–H···O=S/OH₂, whereby the anionic N^? function does not act as an acceptor. The major difference between the dimorphs arises from the topology of the hydrogen bond network, which is two‐dimensional in 1A , leading to a packing of discrete lamellar layers, but three‐dimensional in 1B . Moreover, the latter network is reinforced by a set of weak C–H··O/N hydrogen bonds, whereas the layered structure of 1A displays only one independent C–H···O bond, providing a link between adjacent layers. The compound [Ph₃PNPPh₃]Z ( 2 , monoclinic, P2₁/c, Z′ = 1) is the first structurally authenticated example of an ionic Z^? derivative in which the cation contains neither metal bonding sites nor strong hydrogen bond donors. This structure exhibits columns of anions, surrounded by four parallel columns of cations, giving a square array. The large cations are associated into a three‐dimensional framework via weak C–H···C(π) interactions and an offset face‐to‐face phenyl interaction, while the anions occupy tunnels in this framework and are extensively bonded to the surrounding cations by C–H···O/N^? hydrogen bonds and C–H···C(π) interactions.     

Conformational Properties of (Z,Z)-, (E,Z)-, and (E,E)-Cycloocta-1,4-dienes

Summary.  Ab initio calculations at the HF/6-31G^* level of theory for geometry optimization and the MP2/6-31G^*//HF/6-31G^* level for a single point total energy calculation are reported for (Z,Z)-, (E,Z)-, and (E,E)-cycloocta-1,4-dienes. The C ₂-symmetric twist-boat conformation of (Z,Z)-cycloocta-1,4-diene was calculated to be by 3.6 kJ·mol⁻¹ more stable than the C _S-symmetric boat-chair form; the calculated energy barrier for ring inversion of the twist-boat conformation via the C _S-symmetric boat-boat geometry is 19.1 kJ·mol⁻¹. Interconversion between twist-boat and boat-chair conformations takes place via a half-chair (C ₁) transition state which is 43.5 kJ·mol⁻¹ above the twist-boat form. The unsymmetrical twist-boat-chair conformation of (E,Z)-cycloocta-1,4-diene was calculated to be by 18.7 kJ·mol⁻¹ more stable than the unsymmetrical boat-chair form. The calculated energy barrier for the interconversion of twist-boat-chair and boat-chair is 69.5 kJ·mol⁻¹, whereas the barrier for swiveling of the trans-double bond through the bridge is 172.6 kJ·mol⁻¹. The C _S symmetric crown conformation of the parallel family of (E,E)-cycloocta-1,4-diene was calculated to be by 16.5 kJ·mol⁻¹ more stable than the C _S-symmetric boat-chair form. Interconversion of crown and boat-chair takes place via a chair (C _S) transition state which is 37.2 kJ·mol⁻¹ above the crown conformation. The axial- symmetrical twist geometry of the crossed family of (E,E)-cycloocta-1,4-diene is 5.9 kJ·mol⁻¹ less stable than the crown conformation. Corresponding author. E-mail: isayavar@yahoo.com Received March 25, 2002; accepted April 3, 2002     

Polymorphs of gabapentin

Gabapentin [or 1‐(aminomethyl)cyclohexaneacetic acid], C₉H₁₇NO₂, exists as a zwitterion [1‐(ammoniomethyl)cyclohexaneacetate] in the solid state. The crystal structures and bonding networks of two new monoclinic polymorphs (β‐gabapentin and γ‐gabapentin) are studied and compared with a previously reported gabapentin polymorph [α‐gabapentin: Ibers (2001). Acta Cryst. C 57 , 641–643]. All three polymorphs have extensive networks of hydrogen bonds between the NH₃⁺ and COO⁻ groups of neighbouring molecules. In β‐gabapentin, there is an additional weak intramolecular hydrogen bond.     

A new polymorph of the gastrokinetic drug cisapride monohydrate

Cisapride monohydrate (systematic name: 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐N‐{(3RS,4SR)‐1‐[3‐(4‐fluorophenoxy)propyl]‐3‐methoxypiperidin‐4‐yl}‐2‐methoxybenzamide monohydrate), C₂₃H₂₉ClFN₃O₄·H₂O, is a nondopamine‐blocking gastrokinetic drug. A new polymorph of cisapride monohydrate has been reported nearly three decades after the report of its first known crystal structure [Collin et al. (1989). J. Mol. Struct. 214 , 159–175]. The second polymorph is also monoclinic, but with different unit‐cell parameters. A comparison of both polymorphic forms shows that the difference is thus not in the molecular conformation but in the arrangements of molecules in the crystal packing. The crystal morphology of two forms was predicted with the BFDH model in Materials Studio and inferred that the powder of the new polymorph has better flowability than the original polymorph. The results of DSC (differential scanning calorimetry) analysis and slurry experiments show that both polymorphs are stable at room temperature.     

5‐Iodobenzofurazan 1‐oxide: polymorphs,pseudosymmetry and disorder

5‐Iodobenzofurazan 1‐oxide (systematic name: 5‐iodobenzo‐1,2,5‐oxadiazole 1‐oxide), C₆H₃IN₂O₂, occurs in two polymorphic forms, both monoclinic in P2₁/c with Z′ = 2. The intermolecular interactions in the two polymorphs are quite different. In polymorph (I), there are strong intermolecular I...O interactions, with I...O distances of 3.114 (8) and 3.045 (8) Å. In polymorph (II), there are strong intermolecular I...N interactions, with I...N distances of 3.163 (4) and 3.175 (5) Å. In (I), there is about 15% disorder in one molecule and about 5% in the other. In both polymorphs, there are pseudosymmetric relationships between the crystallographically independent molecules.     

A twinned triclinic polymorph of dibromidotetra­kis(tetra­hydro­furan‐κO)magnesium(II)

The title compound, [MgBr₂(C₄H₈O)₄], forms crystals which appear to be monoclinic but are actually twinned triclinic. The current form is a new triclinic polymorph, with Z′= 2, in addition to the already known tetra­gonal polymorph. Although the geometric parameters of the two polymorphs agree well, their packing patterns are completely different.     

Concomitant polymorphism and conformational isomerism in 4‐acetylresorcinol

Two polymorphs of the title compound [systematic name: 1‐(2,4‐dihydroxyphenyl)ethanone], C₈H₈O₃, were investigated. The known structure [designated (I‐M); P2₁/c, Z = 4; previously investigated at room temperature by Robert, Moore, Eichhorn & Rillema (2007). Acta Cryst. E 63 , o4252] was redetermined at low temperature, and a new form [(I‐O); P2₁2₁2₁, Z = 12] was discovered in the same sample. In both forms, the molecules are planar (apart from the methyl H atoms) and they contain intramolecular O—H...O=C hydrogen bonds. In polymorph (I‐M), molecules are linked into chains by a single intermolecular O—H...O hydrogen bond, and the chains are linked into sheets by two C—H...O hydrogen bonds. Three O—H...O hydrogen bonds link the molecules of polymorph (I‐O) into chains and neighbouring chains are connected by one C—H...O interaction to form an offset layer structure. Two weak methyl C—H...O interactions link the layers.