顶空液相微萃取-气相色谱法测定盐酸雷尼替丁中二氯甲烷和三氯甲烷的残留量

采用顶空液相微萃取与气相色谱联用技术测定雷尼替丁中二氯甲烷和三氯甲烷的残留量。自制了萃取液保护装置。考察了萃取溶剂的种类、萃取时间、萃取温度、萃取液的体积对二氯甲烷和三氯甲烷萃取效果的影响。以正十三烷为萃取剂,在60 ℃下萃取30 min,萃取液滴体积2 μL。二氯甲烷含量在1～10 μg/g范围内与色谱峰高呈线性关系,相关系数(r2)为0.9733;三氯甲烷含量在1～10 μg/g范围内与色谱峰高呈线性关系,r2为0.9724。二氯甲烷和三氯甲烷的最低检出限分别为0.0273 μg/g和0.0410 μg/g,加标回收率分别为93.6%～102%和98.1%～103%。方法简便易行,测定结果准确。     

顶空固相微萃取/气相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱法测定地表水与饮用水中的挥发性有机物

采用部分因子试验设计筛选出顶空固相微萃取的主要影响参数,利用中心复合设计对主要影响参数的取值进行了优化,建立了顶空固相微萃取(HS-SPME)结合气相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)测定地表水和饮用水中55种挥发性有机物(VOCs)的分析方法。取5.0 mL样品于顶空瓶中,加入0.75 g NaCl,使用CAR/PDMS 75μm纤维头,萃取温度40℃,萃取时间40 min,解析温度300℃,在GC-MS/MS选择反应监测(SRM)模式下检测,内标法定量。结果表明,55种VOCs在0.04～0.40、0.4～4.0、4.0～100μg/L质量浓度范围内线性良好,相关系数(r~2)均大于0.99,方法的检出限为0.03～80 ng/L,定量下限为0.1～300 ng/L。55种VOCs在0.2、2.0、40μg/L 3个加标水平下的平均回收率为77.3%～124%,相对标准偏差(RSD,n=6)为1.3%～17%。对3种地表水和3种饮用水进行测定,地表水中有37种VOCs被检出,饮用水中有25种VOCs被检出。实验证明,建立的HS-SPME和GC-MS/MS相结合的检测方法具有准确可靠、简单快速、灵敏度高等优点,适用于地表水和饮用水中VOCs的同时测定。     

静态顶空-气相色谱/质谱法同时检测环境水体中59种挥发性有机物

静态顶空法是一种简单、环保的样品前处理方法.通过对比试验,优化了影响静态顶空进样方法灵敏度的主要因素,确定了较佳的样品盐度(40%)、平衡温度(80℃)、平衡时间(10 min)、平衡压力(0.103 4 MPa)、定量环平衡时间(20 s)、进样时间(3 min)等前处理方法参数.采用优化后水样前处理条件及1.00 k V的检测器电压,59种挥发性有机物在特定的线性范围内,标准曲线线性相关系数均大于0.998,方法检出限为丙烯腈4.4μg/L、硝基苯7.6μg/L,其余挥发性有机物(VOCs)介于0.06~1.4μg/L,饮用水源水及污水处理厂进水实际样品加标回收率为60%~110%,精密度(RSD)为0.33%~22%(n=6).建立的静态顶空-气相色谱/质谱法(HS-GC/MS)水样前处理过程自动化,可同时对水中59种挥发性有机物进行检测.     

顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法测定饮用水源水中1,3,5-三氯苯

采用顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法对饮用水源水中1,3,5-三氯苯进行了测定。以1,2-二氯苯-d4为内标,用PDMS萃取头顶空萃取20min,萃取头于气相色谱进样口解析5min。采用DB-624色谱柱在程序升温条件下进行分离,质谱分析中采用电子轰击离子源(230℃,70eV)及选择离子监测模式测定。结果表明:1,3,5-三氯苯在0.100～2.50μg.L-1范围内呈线性,检出限(3S/N)为0.019μg.L-1。方法用于河流及水库水中的1,3,5-三氯苯的测定,加标回收率在91.5%～126.0%之间。     

多孔膜萃取/微捕集方法及在线测定水中挥发性有机物

基于多孔膜萃取水中挥发性有机物和微捕集技术,构建了一套水中挥发性有机物(Volatile OrganicCompounds,VOCs)样品前处理装置,可自动、在线、连续完成水中挥发性有机物萃取、富集、热解析,传输给气相色谱分离检测。实验分别对膜萃取材料、萃取温度、萃取时间、吹扫气流速等进行了系统优化,并用于氯仿、1,2-二氯甲烷、四氯化碳、三氯乙烯、甲苯、四氯乙烯、乙苯、氯苯、苯乙烯9种挥发性有机物的检测。研究结果表明,采用膜萃取/微捕集装置,与气相色谱联用,在萃取温度60℃,萃取时间30 min,吹扫气流速8 mL/min条件下,采用氢焰离子化检测器(Flame ionization detector,FID),对氯代烃的检出限达到0.003～0.041μg/L,精确度为2.7%～13.0%,线性相关系数均大于0.9936,适用于在线检测水中挥发性有机物。     

顶空固相微萃取/气相色谱-质谱联用测定水中6种挥发性硅氧烷

建立了水中4种环形和2种线形硅氧烷的顶空固相微萃取/气相色谱-质谱联用分析方法.考察了萃取纤维、萃取温度、萃取时间、水样pH值、解析时间、盐效应等因素对实验结果的影响.优化后的条件为:40mL水、40 μL内标(M4Q,500 μg/L)、NaCl(0.1 g/mL)加入60 mL顶空瓶中,选用65μm聚二甲基硅氧烷-二乙烯基苯(PDMS/DVB)纤维于24℃顶空萃取45 min.萃取完成后将纤维插入气相色谱进样口,于200℃解吸2 min进行定性、定量分析.结果表明,6种目标物的方法检出限为(LOD)2.6～7.8 ng/L,回收率为82％～ 96％,相对标准偏差(RSD)为1.1％～7.9％.     

顶空固相微萃取谱-气相色谱-质谱联用测定饮用水中6种致嗅化合物

采用顶空固相微萃取谱-气相色谱-质谱联用法对饮用水中2-甲基异茨醇、土味素、2-甲氧基-3-异丙基吡嗪、2-甲氧基-3-异丁基吡嗪、2,4,6-三氯苯甲醚和2,3,6-三氯苯甲醚共6种致嗅化合物进行了分析。通过对固相微萃取纤维的类型、解吸附时间、NaCl溶液浓度、溶液pH、顶空温度、转速、顶空时间等顶空条件及GC-MS条件的优化,建立了一次性顶空固相微萃取快速测定饮用水中6种致嗅化合物的方法。采用0.10 mol/L的NaOH溶液将水样调至pH 6.0。以DVB/Carboxen/PDMS涂层的固相微萃取纤维头对20 mL添加了NaCl溶液浓度为0.3 g/mL的水样于70℃水浴顶空萃取25 min。被萃取的致嗅化合物于250℃解吸附4 min供GC-MS分析。6种致嗅化合物在0.25～100 ng/L范围内线性关系良好(R>0.986),检出限低于0.1 ng/L。对实际水样进行分析,低、中、高3种不同浓度的加标回收率为93.0%～106.6%,相对标准偏差为3.0%～6.6%(n=6)。该分析方法可对饮用水中6种致嗅化合物进行同时监测。     

顶空-固相微萃取-气相色谱法检测可可麦汁中吡嗪类化合物

建立了顶空-固相微萃取(HS-SPME)-气相色谱快速测定可可麦汁中3种吡嗪类物质(2,5-二甲基吡嗪、2,3,5-三甲基吡嗪和2,3,5,6-四甲基吡嗪)的方法.选择不同的固相微萃取头对萃取温度和时间进行优化,所得最佳萃取条件为:在60℃下,采用75 μm CAR/PDMS萃取头对麦汁样品萃取40 min.本方法的检出限(S/N=3)为0.023～ 0.056 μg/L,线性范围1～500 mg/L;相对标准偏差为3.6％～6.4％;回收率为95.4％～102.7％.本方法应用于样品检测,发现可可麦汁中吡嗪的浓度与原料中可可粉的添加量正相关,显示了很好灵敏性.     

顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱法测定水中三氯乙醛

三氯乙醛在常温下加碱能快速转化为三氯甲烷,通过测量三氯甲烷建立了顶空固相微萃取气相色谱法间接测定水中三氯乙醛的方法。探讨了水中三氯乙醛萃取效率的影响因素,如温度、萃取时间和加盐量等,并确定萃取温度为40℃、萃取时间为5min和3g加盐量作为实验的优化条件。实验结果表明,在0．50-20．0μg／L范围内线性关系良好,方法检出限为0．08μg／L,实际水样加标回收率为103％-120％,测定结果的相对标准偏差不大于2．5％（n=5）。该方法操作简单,重现性好,可用于地表水中三氯乙醛的测定。     

固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法测定饮用水源中53种挥发性有机污染物

应用固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法测定饮用水源中53种挥发性有机污染物的含量。优化的试验条件如下:1萃取纤维为DVB/CAR/PDMS;2萃取温度为25℃;3顶空体积为9mL;4萃取时间为10min;5解吸温度为200℃;6解吸时间为3min。在气相色谱分离中用VF-624MS柱为固定相,在质谱分析中采用全扫描模式。53种挥发性有机污染物在一定的质量浓度范围内与其峰面积呈线性关系,方法的检出限(3S/N)在0.001~0.130μg·L-1之间。方法用于实际水样的分析,加标回收率在75.9%~107%之间,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=5)在0.5%~18%之间。     

高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定水体和沉积物中12种有机磷酸酯类化合物

建立了高效液相色谱-质谱联用技术结合固相萃取和液液萃取方法检测水体和沉积物中12种磷酸酯类(OPEs)化合物残留的方法.水样样品经HLB固相萃取柱富集,乙酸乙酯洗脱两次,沉积物样品以乙腈超声萃取,旋转蒸发至干,用超纯水稀释后重复水样处理步骤,采用ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18色谱柱(150 mm×2.1 mm, 3.5 μm)进行分离,以0.2%甲酸-甲醇作为流动相进行梯度洗脱,采用正离子MRM监测模式,外标法定量分析.水样中,12种OPEs在0.05、0.10和0.50 μg/L加标水平下,除TMP (28.5%~47.8%)和TEHP (22.4%~73.8%) 外,其余目标化合物的平均回收率为66.4%~115.0%,相对标准偏差为0.5%~9.1%,方法定量限(MOQ)为0.001~0.050 μg/L;沉积物中,在5、10和50 μg/kg加标水平下,除TMP(35.7%~44.9%)、TCEP (31.2%~48.9%)外,其余目标化合物的平均回收率为65.9%~120.0%,相对标准偏差为0.01%~9.5%,方法定量限(MOQ)为0.02~2.0 μg/kg(dw).基于上述方法对太湖水样和沉积物样品中目标化合物定量检测分析,∑OPEs含量分别为0.1~1.7 μg/L和8.1~420 μg/kg dw.     

气相色谱法同时测定水中12种挥发性消毒副产物

建立液-液萃取气相色谱法电子捕获检测器(GC/ECD)同时测定饮用水中12种挥发性消毒副产物(Disinfection byproducts, DBPs)的方法.采用过程标准校正降低预处理过程中引入的误差,方法检出限为0.08~0.21 μg/L, 全部组分在21.50 min内测定完成.不同浓度的DBPs在自来水和地表水中的回收率为80.9%~115.7%,相对标准偏差在0.9%~9.9%之间.各组分在0.5~200 μg/L浓度范围内线性关系良好,相关系数R>0.99.应用本方法测定了饮用水和地表水及其氯化后样品中DBPs的含量.本方法简便、快速、稳定,满足饮用水中挥发性DBPs的检测要求.     

Simultaneous determination of three organophosphorus pesticides in different food commodities by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry

A sensitive and selective gas chromatography with mass spectrometry method was developed for the simultaneous determination of three organophosphorus pesticides, namely, chlorpyrifos, malathion, and diazinon in three different food commodities (milk, apples, and drinking water) employing solid‐phase extraction for sample pretreatment. Pesticide extraction from different sample matrices was carried out on Chromabond C₁₈ cartridges using 3.0 mL of methanol and 3.0 mL of a mixture of dichloromethane/acetonitrile (1:1 v/v) as the eluting solvent. Analysis was carried out by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry using selected‐ion monitoring mode. Good linear relationships were obtained in the range of 0.1–50 μg/L for chlorpyrifos, and 0.05–50 μg/L for both malathion and diazinon pesticides. Good repeatability and recoveries were obtained in the range of 78.54–86.73% for three pesticides under the optimized experimental conditions. The limit of detection ranged from 0.02 to 0.03 μg/L, and the limit of quantification ranged from 0.05 to 0.1 μg/L for all three pesticides. Finally, the developed method was successfully applied for the determination of three targeted pesticides in milk, apples, and drinking water samples each in triplicate. No pesticide was found in apple and milk samples, but chlorpyrifos was found in one drinking water sample below the quantification level.     

An evaluation of solid-phase microextraction for analysis of volatile organic compounds in drinking water

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has been applied to the quantitative analysis of 60 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in drinking water. Equilibration curves for the partitioning of the VOCs between the fiber coating and fortified water obtained at 20, 50, and 80 °C are found between the theoretical curves for completely agitated and non-agitated samples. Two important factors for the amount adsorbed by the SPME fiber coating are the extraction time and the fiber coating/water distribution coefficient, K_FW . Both depend on the sample temperature, but in a counteracting manner: Increasing the temperature shortened the equilibration times, especially for the heavier VOCs, but also lead to lower K_FW values, and consequently a lower sensitivity of the method. K_FW values are determined for 33 of the VOCs at 40, 60, and 80°C and the heats of adsorption,–ΔH, are calculated. The nature of the adsorption is found to be exothermic which explains the decreasing sensitivity of the method with increasing temperature. Detection limits were typically from 20 ng/l to 200 ng/l, except for the very light VOCs with which detection difficulties were encountered. For all of the VOCs the linear range extended from the lowest concentration at which they were actually detected to at least 5 mg/l. The precision, 3% average standard deviation when an internal standard was used, was satisfactory for most quantitative routine analysis. SPME was also applied to head-space (HS) analysis of drinking water through the coupled equilibrium between water/head-space/fiber coating. HS-SPME is demonstrated to have shorter equilibration times than SPME directly from the water and equal sensitivities, except for the very light VOCs. Water samples from a drinking water plant contaminated in the low μg/l range with 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethene and tetrachloroethene were analyzed. There seems to be a reasonable agreement between results obtained by SPME and purge & trap. It is concluded that SPME has a great potential for drinking water analysis.     

聚醚砜酮涂层纤维顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱法分析水中痕量的酚类化合物

应用自制的聚醚砜酮(PPESK,30 μm)涂层纤维,采用顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱法测定水中痕量的酚类化合物。优化了固相微萃取温度、萃取时间、pH值和离子强度。方法的检出限为0.003～0.041 μg/L,相对标准偏差低于16%(n=5)。将PPESK涂层纤维与商品化的聚丙烯酸酯涂层纤维对比,结果表明PPESK萃取酚类化合物有较高的萃取富集倍数。用所制备的PPESK萃取头分析自来水、海水等实际水样,20 μg/L添加水平下的回收率分别为100.5%～111.8%和94.8%～117.3%。     

气相色谱法测定地表水中的氯丁二烯

建立固相萃取柱富集–气相色谱法测定地表水中氯丁二烯的方法。采用C18固相萃取小柱对水样进行富集处理,以二氯甲烷作为洗脱液,用带ECD检测器的气相色谱仪测定地表水中氯丁二烯的含量。氯丁二烯的质量浓度在1.0~30.0μg/L范围内与色谱峰面积成良好的线性关系,线性相关系数为0.999 2,方法检出限为0.08μg/L,测定结果的相对标偏差小于2%(n=7),加标回收率为92.3%~97.0%。该方法操作简便、快速,有机试剂用量少,适用于地表水中的氯丁二烯的测定。     

顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用测定饮用水中的2-甲基异莰醇和土臭素

2-甲基异莰醇(2-methylisoborneol, 2-MIB)和土臭素(geosmin, GSM)在水源水中大量分泌排放是造成饮用水土霉异味突发事件、引发居民用水恐慌的重用因素之一。使用顶空固相微萃取(HS-SPME)与气相色谱-质谱联用技术(GC-MS)建立了水库水、水库附近土壤、居民自来水中2-MIB和GSM的测定方法。结合正交分析优化了加盐量、萃取温度、萃取时间条件,在电子轰击(EI)-选择离子扫描(SIM)模式下进行了目标物的定性定量分析。结果表明:在5~1000 ng/L范围内,2-MIB和GSM的色谱峰面积与其质量浓度的线性关系良好(r²≥0.998), 2-MIB与GSM的检出限分别为0.72 ng/L和0.34 ng/L,定量限分别为2.40 ng/L和1.13 ng/L;目标物加标水平为10~600 ng/L时,平均回收率为93.6%~107.7%,相对标准偏差(RSD)≤6.1%(n=6)。基于上述方法,对辽宁省某地区水库水、水库附近土壤、居民自来水中的目标物进行检测,结果表明:水库水目标物质量浓度范围为3.0~3.6 ng/L,水库附近土壤中提取的2-MIB为8.1 ng/L、提取的GSM为17.8 ng/L,居民自来水中的目标物未检出。该方法操作简便、准确可靠,灵敏度高,无需有机溶剂,适合于饮用水中2-MIB和GSM的分析检测。     

Determination of volatile organic compounds in water using ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction followed by gas chromatography

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are toxic compounds in the air, water and land. In the proposed method, ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction (USAEME) combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has been developed for the extraction and determination of eight VOCs in water samples. The influence of each experimental parameter of this method (the type of extraction solvent, volume of extraction solvent, salt addition, sonication time and extraction temperature) was optimized. The procedure for USAEME was as follows: 15 μL of 1-bromooctane was used as the extraction solvent; 10 mL sample solution in a centrifuge tube with a cover was then placed in an ultrasonic water bath for 3 min. After centrifugation, 2 μL of the settled 1-bromooctane extract was injected into the GC-MS for further analysis. The optimized results indicated that the linear range is 0.1-100.0 μg/L and the limits of detection (LODs) are 0.033-0.092 μg/L for the eight analytes. The relative standard deviations (RSD), enrichment factors (EFs) and relative recoveries (RR) of the method when used on lake water samples were 2.8-9.5, 96-284 and 83-110%. The performance of the proposed method was gauged by analyzing samples of tap water, lake water and river water samples.