β‐Diketiminate‐Stabilized Magnesium(I) Dimers and Magnesium(II) Hydride Complexes: Synthesis,Characterization, Adduct Formation,and Reactivity Studies

The preparation and characterization of a series of magnesium(II) iodide complexes incorporating β‐diketiminate ligands of varying steric bulk and denticity, namely, [(ArNCMe)₂CH]^? (Ar=phenyl, (^PhNacnac), mesityl (^MesNacnac), or 2,6‐diisopropylphenyl (Dipp, ^DippNacnac)), [(DippNCtBu)₂CH]^? (^tBuNacnac), and [(DippNCMe)(Me₂NCH₂CH₂NCMe)CH]^? (^DmedaNacnac) are reported. The complexes [(^PhNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)], [(^MesNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)], [(^DmedaNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)], [(^MesNacnac)MgI(thf)], [(^DippNacnac)MgI(thf)], [(^tBuNacnac)MgI], and [(^tBuNacnac)MgI(DMAP)] (DMAP=4‐dimethylaminopyridine) were shown to be monomeric by X‐ray crystallography. In addition, the related β‐diketiminato beryllium and calcium iodide complexes, [(^MesNacnac)BeI] and [{(^DippNacnac)CaI(OEt₂)}₂] were prepared and crystallographically characterized. The reductions of all metal(II) iodide complexes by using various reagents were attempted. In two cases these reactions led to the magnesium(I) dimers, [(^MesNacnac)MgMg(^MesNacnac)] and [(^tBuNacnac)MgMg(^tBuNacnac)]. The reduction of a 1:1 mixture of [(^DippNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)] and [(^MesNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)] with potassium gave a low yield of the crystallographically characterized complex [(^DippNacnac)Mg(μ‐H)(μ‐I)Mg(^MesNacnac)]. All attempts to form beryllium(I) or calcium(I) dimers by reductions of [(^MesNacnac)BeI], [{(^DippNacnac)CaI(OEt₂)}₂], or [{(^tBuNacnac)CaI(thf)}₂] have so far been unsuccessful. The further reactivity of the magnesium(I) complexes [(^MesNacnac)MgMg(^MesNacnac)] and [(^tBuNacnac)MgMg(^tBuNacnac)] towards a variety of Lewis bases and unsaturated organic substrates was explored. These studies led to the complexes [(^MesNacnac)Mg(L)Mg(L)(^MesNacnac)] (L=THF or DMAP), [(^MesNacnac)Mg(μ‐AdN₆Ad)Mg(^MesNacnac)] (Ad=1‐adamantyl), [(^tBuNacnac)Mg(μ‐AdN₆Ad)Mg(^tBuNacnac)], and [(^MesNacnac)Mg(μ‐tBu₂N₂C₂O₂)Mg(^MesNacnac)] and revealed that, in general, the reactivity of the magnesium(I) dimers is inversely proportional to their steric bulk. The preparation and characterization of [(^tBuNacnac)Mg(μ‐H)₂Mg(^tBuNacnac)] has shown the compound to have different structural and physical properties to [(^tBuNacnac)MgMg(^tBuNacnac)]. Treatment of the former with DMAP has given [(^tBuNacnac)Mg(H)(DMAP)], the X‐ray crystal structure of which disclosed it to be the first structurally authenticated terminal magnesium hydride complex. Although attempts to prepare [(^MesNacnac)Mg(μ‐H)₂Mg(^MesNacnac)] were not successful, a neutron diffraction study of the corresponding magnesium(I) complex, [(^MesNacnac)MgMg(^MesNacnac)] confirmed that the compound is devoid of hydride ligands.     

Synthesis and Characterization of a Magnesium Boryl and a Beryllium‐Substituted Diazaborole

Reaction of a lithium boryl, [(THF)₂Li{B(DAB)}] (DAB=[(DipNCH)₂]^2?, Dip=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl), with a dinuclear magnesium(I) compound [{(^MesNacnac)Mg}₂] (^MesNacnac=[HC(MeCNMes)₂]^?, Mes=mesityl) unexpectedly afforded a rare example of a terminal magnesium boryl species, [(^MesNacnac)(THF)Mg{B(DAB)}]. Attempts to prepare the magnesium boryl via a salt metathesis reaction between the lithium boryl and a β‐diketiminato magnesium iodide compound, instead led to an intractable mixture of products. Similarly, reaction of the lithium boryl with a β‐diketiminato beryllium bromide precursor, [(^DepNacnac)BeBr] (Dep=2,6‐diethylphenyl) did not give a beryllium boryl, but instead afforded an unprecedented example of a beryllium substituted diazaborole heterocycle, [{(^DepNacnac)Be(4‐DAB^?H)}BBr]. For sake of comparison, the same group 2 halide precursor compounds were treated with a potassium gallyl analogue of the lithium boryl, viz. [(tmeda)K{:Ga(DAB)}] (tmeda=N,N,N’,N’‐tetramethylethylenediamine), but no reactions were observed.     

Sterically controlled reductive oligomerisations of CO by activated magnesium(i) compounds: deltate vs. ethenediolate formation

An extremely bulky, symmetrical three-coordinate magnesium(i) complex, [{(^TCHPNacnac)Mg}₂] (^TCHPNacnac = [{(TCHP)NCMe}₂CH]⁻, TCHP = 2,4,6-tricyclohexylphenyl) has been prepared and shown to have an extremely long Mg–Mg bond (3.021(1) Å) for such a complex. It was shown not to react with either DMAP (4-dimethylaminopyridine) or CO. Three unsymmetrical 1 : 1 DMAP adducts of less bulky Mg–Mg bonded species have been prepared, viz. [(^ArNacnac)Mg–Mg(DMAP)(^ArNacnac)] (^ArNacnac = [(ArNCMe)₂CH]⁻ Ar = 2,6-xylyl (Xyl), mesityl (Mes) or 2,6-diethylphenyl (Dep)), and their reactivity toward CO explored. Like the previously reported bulkier complex, [(^DipNacnac)Mg–Mg(DMAP)(^DipNacnac)] (Dip = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl), [(^DepNacnac)Mg–Mg(DMAP)(^DepNacnac)] reductively trimerises CO to give a rare example of a deltate complex, [{(^DepNacnac)Mg(μ-C₃O₃)Mg(DMAP)(^DepNacnac)}₂]. In contrast, the two smaller adduct complexes react with only two CO molecules, ultimately giving unusual ethenediolate complexes [{(^ArNacnac)Mg{μ-OC(H) C(DMAP^−H)O}Mg(^ArNacnac)}₂] (Ar = Xyl or Mes). DFT calculations show the latter reactions to proceed via reductive dimerizations of CO, and subsequent intramolecular C–H activation of Mg-ligated DMAP by “zig–zag” [C₂O₂]²⁻ fragments of reaction intermediates. Calculations also suggest that magnesium deltate complexes are kinetic products in these reactions, while the magnesium ethenediolates are thermodynamic products. This study shows that subtle changes to the bulk of the reacting 1 : 1 DMAP–magnesium(i) adduct complexes can lead to fine steric control over the products arising from their CO reductive oligomerisations. Furthermore, it is found that the more activated nature of the adduct complexes, relative to their symmetrical, three-coordinate counterparts, [{(^ArNacnac)Mg}₂], likely derives more from the polarisation of the Mg–Mg bonds of the former, than the elongated nature of those bonds.

Subtle changes to the bulk of 1 : 1 adducts of DMAP with magnesium(i) complexes leads to steric control over the products arising from their reductive oligomerisations of carbon monoxide.      

C−H Activation of Inert Arenes using a Photochemically Activated Guanidinato-Magnesium(I) Compound

UV irradiation of solutions of a guanidinate coordinated dimagnesium(I) compound, [{(Priso)Mg}₂] 3 (Priso=[(DipN)₂CNPrⁱ₂]⁻, Dip=2,6-diisopropylphenyl), in either benzene, toluene, the three isomers of xylene, or mesitylene, leads to facile activation of an aromatic C−H bond of the solvent in all cases, and formation of aryl/hydride bridged magnesium(II) products, [{(Priso)Mg}₂(μ-H)(μ-Ar)] 4 – 9 . In contrast to similar reactions reported for β-diketiminate coordinated counterparts of 3 , these C−H activations proceed with little regioselectivity, though they are considerably faster. Reaction of 3 with an excess of the pyridine, p-NC₅H₄Bu^t (py^But), gave [(Priso)Mg(py^ButH)(py^But)₂] 10 , presumably via reduction of the pyridine to yield a radical intermediate, [(Priso)Mg(py^But⋅)(py^But)₂] 11 , which then abstracts a proton from the reaction solvent or a reactant. DFT calculations suggest two possible pathways to the observed arene C−H activations. One of these involves photochemical cleavage of the Mg−Mg bond of 3 , generating magnesium(I) doublet radicals, (Priso)Mg⋅. These then doubly reduce the arene substrate to give “Birch-like” products, which subsequently rearrange via C−H activation of the arene. Circumstantial evidence for the photochemical generation of transient magnesium radical species includes the fact that irradiation of a cyclohexane solution of 3 leads to an intramolecular aliphatic C−H activation process and formation of an alkyl-bridged magnesium(II) species, [{Mg(μ-Priso^−H)}₂] 12 . Furthermore, irradiation of a 1 : 1 mixture of 3 and the β-diketiminato dimagnesium(I) compound, [{(^DipNacnac)Mg}₂] (^DipNacnac=[HC(MeCNDip)₂]⁻), effects a “scrambling” reaction, and the near quantitative formation of an unsymmetrical dimagnesium(I) compound, [(Priso)Mg−Mg(^DipNacnac)] 13 . Finally, the EPR spectrum (77 K) of a glassed solution of UV irradiated 3 is dominated by a broad featureless signal, indicating the presence of a doublet radical species.     

Synthesis of a Hexameric Magnesium 4-pyridyl Complex with Cyclohexane-like Ring Structure via Reductive C-N Activation

The reaction of [{(^Arnacnac)Mg}₂] (^Arnacnac = HC{MeC(NAr)}₂, Ar = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl, Dip, or 2,6-diethylphenyl, Dep) with 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) at elevated temperatures afforded the hexameric magnesium 4-pyridyl complex [{(^Arnacnac)Mg(4-C₅H₄N)}₆] via reductive cleavage of the DMAP C-N bond. The title compound contains a large s-block organometallic cyclohexane-like ring structure comprising tetrahedral (^Arnacnac)Mg nodes and linked by linear 4-pyridyl bridging ligands, and the structure is compared with other ring systems. [(^Dipnacnac)Mg(DMAP)(NMe₂)] was structurally characterised as a by-product.     

Magnesium(I) Reduction of Aluminum(III) Hydride Complexes: Generation of Mixed Valence Aluminum (AlI/Al0) Hydride Cluster Compounds, [Al6H8(NR3)2{Mg(β-diketiminate)}4]**

Reduction of a range of amido- and aryloxy-aluminum dihydride complexes, e.g. [AlH₂(NR₃){N(SiMe₃)₂}] (NR₃=NMe₃ or N-methylpiperidine (NMP)), with β-diketiminato dimagnesium(I) reagents, [{(^ArNacnac)Mg}₂] (^ArNacnac=[HC(MeCNAr)₂]⁻, Ar=mesityl (Mes) or 2,6-xylyl (Xyl)), have afforded deep red mixed valence aluminum hydride cluster compounds, [Al₆H₈(NR₃)₂{Mg(^ArNacnac)}₄], which have an average Al oxidation state of +0.66, the lowest for any well-defined aluminum hydride compound. In the solid-state, the clusters are shown to have distorted octahedral Al₆ cores, having zero-valent Al axial sites and mono-valent AlH₂⁻ equatorial units. Several novel by-products were isolated from the reactions that gave the clusters, including the Mg−Al bonded magnesio-aluminate complexes, [(^ArNacnac)(Me₃N)Mg−Al(μ-H)₃[{Mg(^ArNacnac)}₂(μ-H)]]. Computational analyses of one aluminum hydride cluster revealed its Al₆ core to be electronically delocalized, and to possess one unoccupied, and six occupied, skeletal molecular orbitals.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Group 12 Metal(I) Complexes Bearing Extremely Bulky Boryl/Silyl Substituted Amide Ligands

Two extremely bulky boryl/silyl-substituted amide ligands, –N{B(DipNCH)₂}(SiR₃) (R = Me ^TBoL, R = Ph ^PhBoL; Dip = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl) were used in the preparation of the group 12 metal halide complexes, ^PhBoLZnBr, {^TBoLCd(μ-I)}₂, ^TBoLHgI, and ^PhBoLHgI. The reduction of these, and two previously reported compounds, ^PhBoLZnBr(THF) and {^PhBoLCd(μ-I)}₂, using a magnesium(I) compound, {(^MesNacnac)Mg}₂ (^MesNacnac = [(MesNCMe)₂CH]^–, Mes = mesityl), were carried out, leading to mixed results. In several cases these reactions led to decomposition, and deposition of the group 12 metal. However, in two instances the homobimetallic metal(I) complexes, ^TBoLM–M^TBoL (M = Zn or Hg), were isolated and crystallographically characterized. The reduction of {^PhBoLCd(μ-I)}₂ afforded the known cadmium(I) complex, ^PhBoLCd–Cd^PhBoL, but also gave a very low yield of the thermally unstable complex, ^PhBoLCd–Mg(THF)(^MesNacnac). The X-ray crystal structure of this compound reveals it to contain the first example of a Cd–Mg bond in a molecular compound.     

A Mixed‐Valence Tri‐Zinc Complex, [LZnZnZnL] (L=Bulky Amide), Bearing a Linear Chain of Two‐Coordinate Zinc Atoms

Reduction of a variety of extremely bulky amido Group 12 metal halide complexes, [LMX(THF)_0,1] (L=amide; M=Zn, Cd, or Hg; X=halide) with a magnesium(I) dimer gave a homologous series of two‐coordinate metal(I) dimers, [L′MML′] (L′=N(Ar^?)(SiMe₃), Ar^?=C₆H₂{C(H)Ph₂}₂Prⁱ‐2,6,4); and the formally zinc(0) complex, [L*ZnMg(^MesNacnac)] (L*=N(Ar*)(SiPrⁱ₃); Ar*=C₆H₂{C(H)Ph₂}₂Me‐2,6,4; ^MesNacnac=[(MesNCMe)₂CH]^?, Mes=mesityl), which contains the first unsupported Zn? Mg bond. Two equivalents of [L*ZnMg(^MesNacnac)] react with ZnBr₂ or ZnBr₂(tmeda) to give the mixed valence, two‐coordinate, linear tri‐zinc complex, [L*Zn^IZn⁰Zn^IL*], and the first zinc(I) halide complex, [L*ZnZnBr(tmeda)], respectively. The analogues [L*ZnMZnL*] (M=Cd or Hg), were also prepared, the Cd species contains the first Zn? Cd bond in a molecular compound. Metal–metal bonding was studied by DFT calculations.     

Magnesium(I) dimers as reagents for the reductive coupling of isonitriles and nitriles

The reactivity of two β-diketiminate coordinated magnesium(I) dimers, [LMgMgL], L=[(RNCMe)(2) CH](-) , R=C(6) H(3) iPr(2) -2,6 ((Dip) Nacnac(-) ) or mesityl ((Mes) Nacnac(-) ), towards a series of isonitriles and nitriles have been examined. Reactions with the isonitriles, RN?C: (R=tBu or C(6) H(3) Me(2) -2,6 (Xyl)), led to reductive C?C couplings and the formation of [{((Dip) Nacnac)Mg}(2) {μ-(XylN=C-)(2) }] and [{((Mes) Nacnac)Mg}(2) {μ-(tBuN=C-)(2) }], or a reductive N?C cleavage and the generation of the magnesium cyanide complex, [{((Dip) Nacnac)Mg(μ-CN)}(3) ]. Reactions of the magnesium dimers with benzonitrile, PhC?N, afforded the C?C-coupled products, [((Dip) Nacnac)Mg[μ-{N=C(Ph)-}(2) ]Mg(NCPh)((Dip) Nacnac)], and [{{((Mes) Nacnac)Mg}(2) [μ-{N=C(Ph)-}(2) ]}(2) ], whereas the reductive C?C cleavage of tBuC?N gave rise to a mixture of [((Dip) Nacnac)Mg(tBu)(NCtBu)] and [{((Dip) Nacnac)Mg(μ-CN)}(3) ]. In contrast, a combination of net nitrile isomerization and C?C coupling processes was involved in the reduction of Me(3) SiC?N, which yielded [{((Dip) Nacnac)Mg}(2) {μ-(Me(3) SiN=C-)(2) }]. All new compounds were crystallographically and spectroscopically characterized. The outcomes of the reported reactions were found to be dependent upon both the steric bulk of the magnesium(I) reagent, and the nature of the isonitrile/nitrile substituent. This combined with a high degree of selectivity for the reactions, indicates that magnesium(I) dimers may find use by organic and organometallic chemists as viable alternatives to currently available reducing agents that are utilized for the reduction of unsaturated organic substrates.     

A Dimeric NHC–Silicon Monotelluride: Synthesis,Isomerization, and Reactivity

The reaction of the NHC–disilicon(0) complex [(I_Ar)Si=Si(I_Ar)] ( 1 , I_Ar=:C{N(Ar)C(H)}₂, Ar=2,6‐i Pr₂C₆H₃) with two equiv of elemental Te in toluene at room temperature for three days afforded a mixture of the first dimeric NHC–silicon monotelluride [(I_Ar)Si=Te]₂ ( 2 ) and its isomeric complex [(I_Ar)Si(μ‐Te)Si(I_Ar)=Te] ( 3 ). When the same reaction was performed for ten days, only 3 was isolated from the reaction mixture. Compound 1 reacted with four equiv of elemental Te in toluene for four weeks, which proceeded through the formation of 2 , 3 and the NHC–disilicon tritelluride complex [{(I_Ar)Si(=Te)}₂Te] ( 5‐Te ), to form the dimeric NHC–silicon ditelluride [(I_Ar)Si(=Te)(μ‐Te)]₂ ( 4 ). The reactions are in line with theoretical mechanistic studies for the formation of 4 . Compound 3 reacted with one equiv of elemental sulfur in toluene to form the first NHC–disilicon sulfur ditelluride complex [{(I_Ar)Si(=Te)}₂S] ( 5‐S ).     

A Dimeric NHC–Silicon Monotelluride: Synthesis,Isomerization, and Reactivity

The reaction of the NHC–disilicon(0) complex [(I_Ar)Si=Si(I_Ar)] ( 1 , I_Ar=:C{N(Ar)C(H)}₂, Ar=2,6‐i Pr₂C₆H₃) with two equiv of elemental Te in toluene at room temperature for three days afforded a mixture of the first dimeric NHC–silicon monotelluride [(I_Ar)Si=Te]₂ ( 2 ) and its isomeric complex [(I_Ar)Si(μ‐Te)Si(I_Ar)=Te] ( 3 ). When the same reaction was performed for ten days, only 3 was isolated from the reaction mixture. Compound 1 reacted with four equiv of elemental Te in toluene for four weeks, which proceeded through the formation of 2 , 3 and the NHC–disilicon tritelluride complex [{(I_Ar)Si(=Te)}₂Te] ( 5‐Te ), to form the dimeric NHC–silicon ditelluride [(I_Ar)Si(=Te)(μ‐Te)]₂ ( 4 ). The reactions are in line with theoretical mechanistic studies for the formation of 4 . Compound 3 reacted with one equiv of elemental sulfur in toluene to form the first NHC–disilicon sulfur ditelluride complex [{(I_Ar)Si(=Te)}₂S] ( 5‐S ).     

Diagonally Related s‐ and p‐Block Metals Join Forces: Synthesis and Characterization of Complexes with Covalent Beryllium–Aluminum Bonds

Additions of beryllium–halide bonds in the simple beryllium dihalide adducts, [BeX₂(tmeda)] (X=Br or I, tmeda=N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine), across the metal center of a neutral aluminum(I) heterocycle, [:Al(^DipNacnac)] (^DipNacnac=[(DipNCMe)₂CH]^?, Dip=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl), have yielded the first examples of compounds with beryllium–aluminum bonds, [(^DipNacnac)(X)Al‐Be(X)(tmeda)]. For sake of comparison, isostructural Mg–Al and Zn–Al analogues of these complexes, viz. [(^DipNacnac)(X)Al‐M(X)(tmeda)] (M=Mg or Zn, X=I or Br) have been prepared and structurally characterized. DFT calculations reveal all compounds to have high s‐character metal–metal bonds, the polarity of which is consistent with the electronegativities of the metals involved. Preliminary reactivity studies of [(^DipNacnac)(Br)Al‐Be(Br)(tmeda)] are reported.     

Magnesium(I) Dimers Bearing Tripodal Diimine–Enolate Ligands: Proficient Reagents for the Controlled Reductive Activation of CO2 and SO2

The first examples of magnesium(I) dimers bearing tripodal ligands, [(Mg{κ³‐N,N′,O‐(ArNCMe)₂(OCCPh₂)CH})₂] [Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ (Dip) 7 , 2,6‐Et₂C₆H₃ (Dep) 8 , or mesityl (Mes) 9 ] have been prepared by post‐synthetic modification of the β‐diketiminato ligands of previously reported magnesium(I) systems, using diphenylketene, O?C?CPh₂. In contrast, related reactions between β‐diketiminato magnesium(I) dimers and the isoelectronic ketenimine, MesN?C?CPh₂, resulted in reductive insertion of the substrate into the Mg?Mg bond of the magnesium(I) reactant, and formation of [{(Nacnac)Mg}₂{μ‐κ²‐N,C‐(Mes)NCCPh₂}] (Nacnac=[(ArNCMe)₂CH]^?; Ar=Dep 10 or Mes 11 ). Reactions of the four‐coordinate magnesium(I) dimer 8 with excess CO₂ are readily controlled, and cleanly give carbonate [(LMg)₂(μ‐κ²:κ²‐CO₃)] 12 (L=[κ³‐N,N′,O‐(DepNCMe)₂(OCCPh₂)CH]^?; thermodynamic product), or oxalate [(LMg)₂(μ‐κ²:κ²‐C₂O₄)] 13 (kinetic product), depending on the reaction temperature. Compound 12 and CO are formed by reductive disproportionation of CO₂, whereas 13 results from reductive coupling of two molecules of the gas. Treatment of 8 with an excess of N₂O cleanly gives the μ‐oxo complex [(LMg)₂(μ‐O)] 14 , which reacts facilely with CO₂ to give 12 . This result presents the possibility that 14 is an intermediate in the formation of 12 from the reaction of 8 and CO₂. In contrast to its reactions with CO₂, 8 reacts with SO₂ over a wide temperature range to give only one product; the first example of a magnesium dithionite complex, [(LMg)₂(μ‐κ²:κ²‐S₂O₄)] 16 , which is formed by reductive coupling of two molecules of SO₂, and is closely related to f‐block metal dithionite complexes derived from similar SO₂ reductive coupling processes. On the whole, this study strengthens previously proposed analogies between the reactivities of magnesium(I) systems and low‐valent f‐block metal complexes, especially with respect to small molecule activations.     

Reactions of ytterbium and magnesium gallylene complexes with carbon dioxide and diphenylketene

Reactivity of ytterbium and magnesium complexes of gallylenes against carbon dioxide and diphenylketene has been assessed. Ytterbium complex of redox-active gallylene [{(dpp-bian)Ga}₂Yb(DME)₂] (dpp-bian = 1,2-bis[(2,6-diiso-propylphenyl)imino]acenaphthene) on treatment with CO₂ gives complex [(dpp-bian)Ga(DME)Me], while the treatment of magnesium-stabilized gallylene[{(dpp-bian)Ga}₂Mg(DME)₂] with Ph₂CCO affords cycloadduct [(dpp-bian)(Ph₂CCO)GaMe].     

A neutral, monomeric germanium(I) radical

Stoichiometric reduction of the bulky β-diketiminato germanium(II) chloride complex [((But)Nacnac)GeCl] ((But)Nacnac = [{N(Dip)C(Bu(t))}(2)CH](-), Dip = C(6)H(3)Pr(i)(2)-2,6) with either sodium naphthalenide or the magnesium(I) dimer [{((Mes)Nacnac)Mg}(2)] ((Mes)Nacnac = [(MesNCMe)(2)CH](-), Mes = mesityl) afforded the radical complex [((But)Nacnac)Ge:](?) in moderate yields. X-ray crystallographic, EPR/ENDOR spectroscopic, computational, and reactivity studies revealed this to be the first authenticated monomeric, neutral germanium(I) radical.     

Preparation, characterization, and theoretical analysis of group 14 element(I) dimers: a case study of magnesium(I) compounds as reducing agents in inorganic synthesis

A synthetic route to the new amidine (DipNH)(DipN)C(C(6)H(4)Bu(t)-4) (ButisoH; Dip = C(6)H(3)Pr(i)(2)-2,6) has been developed. Its deprotonation with either LiBu(n) or KN(SiMe(3))(2) yields the amidinate complexes [M(Butiso)] (M = Li or K). Their reactions with group 14 element halides/pseudohalides afford the heteroleptic group 14 complexes [(Butiso)SiCl(3)], [(Butiso)ECl] (E = Ge or Sn), and [{(Butiso)Pb(μ-O(3)SCF(3))(THF)}(∞)], all of which have been crystallographically characterized. In addition, the synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of the homoleptic complex [Pb(Butiso)(2)] is reported. Reductions of the heteroleptic complexes with a soluble magnesium(I) dimer, [{((Mes)Nacnac)Mg}(2)] ((Mes)Nacnac = [(MesNCMe)(2)CH](-); Mes = mesityl), have given moderate-to-high yields of the group 14 element(I) dimers [{(Butiso)E}(2)] (E = Si, Ge, or Sn), the X-ray crystallographic studies of which reveal trans-bent structures. The corresponding lead(I) complex could not be prepared. Comprehensive spectroscopic and theoretical analyses of [{(Butiso)E}(2)] have allowed their properties to be compared. All complexes possess E-E single bonds and can be considered as intramolecularly base-stabilized examples of ditetrelynes, REER. Taken as a whole, this study highlights the synthetic utility of soluble and easy to prepare magnesium(I) dimers as valuable alternatives to the harsh, and often insoluble, alkali-metal reducing agents that are currently widely employed in the synthesis of low-oxidation-state organometallic/inorganic complexes.     

Synthesis and Reactivity Studies of Amido-Substituted Germanium(I)/Tin(I) Dimers and Clusters

Three amide ligands of varying steric bulk and electronic properties were utilized to prepare a series of amido-germanium(II)/tin(II) halide compounds, (LEX)_n, (L= -N{B(DipNCH)₂}(SiMe₃), ^TBoL; -N{B(DipNCH)₂}(SiPh₃), ^PhBoL; -N(Dip)(tBu), ^DBuL; Dip=C₆H₃iPr₂-2,6; E=Ge or Sn; X=Cl or Br; n=1 or 2). Reductions of these with a magnesium(I) dimer, {(^MesNacnac)Mg}₂ (^MesNacnac=[(MesNCMe)₂CH]⁻, Mes=mesityl), afforded singly bonded amido-digermynes (^TBoLGe−Ge^TBoL and ^PhBoLGe−Ge^PhBoL), and an amido-distannyne (^PhBoLSn−Sn^PhBoL), in addition to several low-valent, amido stabilized tetrel–tetrel bonded cluster compounds, (^DBuLGe)₄, (^DBuLSn)₆ and Sn₅(^TBoL)₄. The nature of the products resulting from these reactions was largely dependent on the steric bulk of the amide ligand employed. Cluster (^DBuLGe)₄ possessed an unusual folded butterfly structure, the bonding and electronic of which were examined using DFT calculations. Reactions of the amido-germanium(I) compounds with H₂ were explored, and gave rise to the amido-digermene, ^TBoL(H)Ge=Ge(H)^TBoL and the cyclotetragermane, {^DBuL(H)Ge}₄. Reactions of (^DBuLGe)₄ with a series of unsaturated small molecule substrates yielded ^DBuLGeOGe^DBuL, ^DBuLGe(μ-C₂H₄)₂Ge^DBuL and ^DBuLGe(μ-1,4-C₆H₈)(μ-1,2-C₆H₈)Ge^DBuL. The latter results imply that (^DBuLGe)₄ can act as a masked source of the digermyne ^DBuLGeGe^DBuL in these reactions. All further reactivity studies indicated that the germanium(I) compounds exhibit a “transition-metal-like” behavior, which is closely related to that previously described for bulky digermynes and related compounds.     

Expanded‐Ring N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes for the Stabilization of Highly Electrophilic Gold(I) Cations

Strategies for the synthesis of highly electrophilic Au^I complexes from either hydride‐ or chloride‐containing precursors have been investigated by employing sterically encumbered Dipp‐substituted expanded‐ring NHCs (Dipp=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃). Thus, complexes of the type (NHC)AuH have been synthesised (for NHC=6‐Dipp or 7‐Dipp) and shown to feature significantly more electron‐rich hydrides than those based on ancillary imidazolylidene donors. This finding is consistent with the stronger σ‐donor character of these NHCs, and allows for protonation of the hydride ligand. Such chemistry leads to the loss of dihydrogen and to the trapping of the [(NHC)Au]⁺ fragment within a dinuclear gold cation containing a bridging hydride. Activation of the hydride ligand in (NHC)AuH by B(C₆F₅)₃, by contrast, generates a species (at low temperatures) featuring a [HB(C₆F₅)₃]^? fragment with spectroscopic signatures similar to the “free” borate anion. Subsequent rearrangement involves B?C bond cleavage and aryl transfer to the carbophilic metal centre. Under halide abstraction conditions utilizing Na[BAr^f₄] (Ar^f=C₆H₃(CF₃)₂‐3,5), systems of the type [(NHC)AuCl] (NHC=6‐Dipp or 7‐Dipp) generate dinuclear complexes [{(NHC)Au}₂(μ‐Cl)]⁺ that are still electrophilic enough at gold to induce aryl abstraction from the [BAr^f₄]^? counterion.     

Trapping a Silicon(I) Radical with Carbenes: A Cationic cAAC–Silicon(I) Radical and an NHC–Parent-Silyliumylidene Cation

The trapping of a silicon(I) radical with N-heterocyclic carbenes is described. The reaction of the cyclic (alkyl)(amino) carbene [cAAC_Me] (cAAC_Me=:C(CMe₂)₂(CH₂)NAr, Ar=2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃) with H₂SiI₂ in a 3:1 molar ratio in DME afforded a mixture of the separated ion pair [(cAAC_Me)₂Si:^.]⁺I⁻ ( 1 ), which features a cationic cAAC–silicon(I) radical, and [cAAC_Me−H]⁺I⁻. In addition, the reaction of the NHC–iodosilicon(I) dimer [I_Ar(I)Si:]₂ (I_Ar=:C{N(Ar)CH}₂) with 4 equiv of I_Me (:C{N(Me)CMe}₂), which proceeded through the formation of a silicon(I) radical intermediate, afforded [(I_Me)₂SiH]⁺I⁻ ( 2 ) comprising the first NHC–parent-silyliumylidene cation. Its further reaction with fluorobenzene afforded the C_Ar−H bond activation product [1-F-2-I_Me-C₆H₄]⁺I⁻ ( 3 ). The isolation of 2 and 3 confirmed the reaction mechanism for the formation of 1 . Compounds 1 – 3 were analyzed by EPR and NMR spectroscopy, DFT calculations, and X-ray crystallography.     

Heavy Alkali Metal Manganate Complexes: Synthesis,Structures and Solvent-Induced Dissociation Effects

Rare examples of heavier alkali metal manganates [{(AM)Mn(CH₂SiMe₃)(N^‘Ar)₂}_∞] (AM=K, Rb, or Cs) [N^‘Ar=N(SiMe₃)(Dipp), where Dipp=2,6-iPr₂-C₆H₃] have been synthesised with the Rb and Cs examples crystallographically characterised. These heaviest manganates crystallise as polymeric zig-zag chains propagated by AM⋅⋅⋅π-arene interactions. Key to their preparation is to avoid Lewis base donor solvents. In contrast, using multidentate nitrogen donors encourages ligand scrambling leading to redistribution of these bimetallic manganate compounds into their corresponding homometallic species as witnessed for the complete Li - Cs series. Adding to the few known crystallographically characterised unsolvated and solvated rubidium and caesium s-block metal amides, six new derivatives ([{AM(N^‘Ar)}_∞], [{AM(N^‘Ar)⋅TMEDA}_∞], and [{AM(N^‘Ar)⋅PMDETA}_∞] where AM=Rb or Cs) have been structurally authenticated. Utilising monodentate diethyl ether as a donor, it was also possible to isolate and crystallographically characterise sodium manganate [(Et₂O)₂Na(ⁿBu)Mn[(N^‘Ar)₂], a monomeric, dinuclear structure prevented from aggregating by two blocking ether ligands bound to sodium.