Neue 1,1′-Ferrocendichalkogenato-Komplexe des Rutheniums und Osmiums

New 1,1′-Ferrocene Dichalcogenato Complexes of Ruthenium and Osmium Both trinuclear 1,1′-ferrocene dichalcogenato complexes(¹) such as fc(E[ML_n])₂ ( 1a—c ) (with [ML_n] = Ru(CO)₂Cp*; E = S, Se, Te) and dinuclear [3]ferrocenophane derivatives of the type fcE₂[ML_n] (with [ML_n] = Ru(CO)(η⁶-C₆Me₆) ( 2a, b ), Ru(NO)Cp* ( 3a, b ) (E = S, Se) or Os(NO)Cp* ( 4a—c ) (E = S, Se, Te)) were synthesized and characterized by their IR-, ¹H- and ¹³C NMR spectra as well as their mass spectra. The molecular structure of fcS₂[Os(NO)Cp*] ( 4a ) was determined by an X-Ray structure analysis; the long Fe…?Os distance of 431.1(1)pm excludes any direct bonding interactions.     

Chalkogen‐Derivate der Halbsandwich‐Wolfram(V)‐Komplexe Cp*WCl4 und Cp*WCl4(PMe3). Röntgen‐Kristallstrukturanalysen von anti‐[Cp*W(Se)(μ‐Se)]2 und Cp*W(S)2(OMe)

Chalcogen Derivatives of the Halfsandwich Tungsten(V) Complexes Cp*WCl₄ and Cp*WCl₄(PMe₃). X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analyses of anti ‐[Cp*W(Se)(μ‐Se)]₂ and Cp*W(S)₂(OMe) The chalcogenation of Cp*WCl₄ ( 1 ) by E(SiMe₃)₂ (E = S, Se) and Te(SiMe₂^tBu)₂ in chloroform solution leads to dimeric products of the type anti‐[Cp*W(E)(μ‐E)]₂ (E = S ( 3 a ), Se ( 3 b ) and Te ( 3 c )). An X‐ray structure determination of 3 b indicates a centrosymmetric molecule containing a planar W(μ‐Se)₂W ring, the W–W distance (297.9(1) pm) corresponds to a single bond. In the presence of air the two terminal chalcogenido ligands (E) in 3 a – c are stepwise replaced by oxido ligands (O) to give [Cp*W(O)(μ‐E)]₂ (E = S ( 5 a ), Se ( 5 b ) and Te ( 5 c )) in quantitative yields. The reaction of Cp*WCl₄ with H₂S or ammonium polysulfide, (NH₄)₂S_x (x ∼ 10), leads to Cp*W(S)₂Cl ( 6 a ); the corresponding methoxy derivative, Cp*W(S)₂OCH₃ ( 9 a ), has been characterized by an X‐ray structure analysis. On the other hand, the reaction of Cp*WCl₄(PMe₃) ( 2 ) with sodium tetrasulfide, Na₂S₄, in dimethylformamide solution gives a mixture of mononuclear Cp*W(S)(S₂)Cl ( 8 a ), dinuclear [Cp*W(S)(μ‐S)]₂ ( 3 a ) and a trinuclear side‐product of composition Cp*₂W₃S₇ ( 13 a ). Terminal sulfido ligands are replaced by terminal oxido ligands in solution in the presence of oxygen. Thus, 6 a is stepwise converted into Cp*W(O)(S)Cl ( 10 a ) and CpW(O)₂Cl ( 12 a ), whereas 8 a gives Cp*W(O)(S₂)Cl ( 11 a ) and 13 a leads to Cp*₂W₃(O)S₆ ( 14 a ). The disulfido complexes 8 a and 11 a are desulfurized by triphenylphosphane to give 6 a and 10 a . The new complexes have been characterized by their IR and NMR spectra and by mass spectrometry.     

Four‐Membered Heterometallacyclic d0 and d1 Complexes of Group 4 Metallocenes with Amidato Ligands

A study of the coordination chemistry of different amidato ligands [(R)N?C(Ph)O] (R=Ph, 2,6‐diisopropylphenyl (Dipp)) at Group 4 metallocenes is presented. The heterometallacyclic complexes [Cp₂M(Cl){κ²‐N,O‐(R)N?C(Ph)O}] M=Zr, R=Dipp ( 1 a ), Ph ( 1 b ); M=Hf, R=Ph ( 2 )) were synthesized by reaction of [Cp₂MCl₂] with the corresponding deprotonated amides. Complex 1 a was also prepared by direct deprotonation of the amide with Schwartz reagent [Cp₂Zr(H)Cl]. Salt metathesis reaction of [Cp₂Zr(H)Cl] with deprotonated amide [(Dipp)N?C(Ph)O] gave the zirconocene hydrido complex [Cp₂M(H){κ²‐N,O‐(Dipp)N?C(Ph)O}] ( 3 ). Reaction of 1 a with Mg did not result in the desired Zr(III) complex but in formation of Mg complex [(py)₃Mg(Cl) {κ²‐N,O‐(Dipp)N?C(Ph)O}] ( 4 ; py=pyridine). The paramagnetic complexes [Cp′₂Ti{κ²‐N,O‐(R)N?C(Ph)O}] (Cp′=Cp, R=Ph ( 7 a ); Cp′=Cp, R=Dipp ( 7 b ); Cp′=Cp*, R=Ph ( 8 )) were prepared by the reaction of the known titanocene alkyne complexes [Cp₂′Ti(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)] (Cp′=Cp ( 5 ), Cp′=Cp* ( 6 )) with the corresponding amides. Complexes 1 a , 2 , 3 , 4 , 7 a , 7 b , and 8 were characterized by X‐ray crystallography. The structure and bonding of complexes 7 a and 8 were also characterized by EPR spectroscopy.     

New Routes to a Series of σ‐Borane/Borate Complexes of Molybdenum and Ruthenium

A series of agostic σ‐borane/borate complexes have been synthesized and structurally characterized from simple borane adducts. A room‐temperature reaction of [Cp*Mo(CO)₃Me], 1 with Li[BH₃(EPh)] (Cp*=pentamethylcyclopentadienyl, E=S, Se, Te) yielded hydroborate complexes [Cp*Mo(CO)₂(μ‐H)BH₂EPh] in good yields. With 2‐mercapto‐benzothiazole, an N,S‐carbene‐anchored σ‐borate complex [Cp*Mo(CO)₂BH₃(1‐benzothiazol‐2‐ylidene)] ( 5 ) was isolated. Further, a transmetalation of the B‐agostic ruthenium complex [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BHL₂] ( 6 , L=C₇H₄NS₂) with [Mn₂(CO)₁₀] affords a new B‐agostic complex, [Mn(CO)₃(μ‐H)BHL₂] ( 7 ) with the same structural motif in which the central metal is replaced by an isolobal and isoelectronic [Mn(CO)₃] unit. Natural‐bond‐orbital analyses of 5–7 indicate significant delocalization of the electron density from the filled σ_B?H orbital to the vacant metal orbital.     

Neue Rheniumkomplexe mit Trichalkogenido- und Tetrachalkogenido-Chelatliganden

New Rhenium Complexes Containing Trichalcogenido and Tetrachalcogenido Chelate Ligands The reactions of Cp*ReCl₄ with polychalcogenide salts such as Na₂S₄ or (NEt₄)₂Se₆ lead initially to the violet trichalcogenido chelate complexes Cp*ReCl₂(E₃) (E = S ( 3a ), Se ( 3b )) which, due to their functional chloro ligands, can be used as intermediates for further reactions. Upon hydrolysis in moist solvents or aminolysis with tert. butylamine 3a, b are converted into the tetrachalcogenido chelate complexes Cp*Re(O)(E₄) (E = S ( 4a ), Se ( 4b )) and Cp*Re(N^tBu)(E₄) (E = S ( 5a ), Se ( 5b )), respectively. X-Ray structure analyses were carried out for the three mononuclear cyclo-oligoselenido compounds 3b–5b . It appears that the size of the Se^2?_n chelate ring (n = 3 or 4) essentially depends on steric factors within the coordination sphere of rhenium.     

Syntheses,Crystal Structures,and Reactivity of [enH]4[Sn2Se6]·en, [enH]4[Sn2Te6]·en and [enH]4[Sn2S6]: Known Anions within Novel Coordination Spheres obtained by Novel Synthesis Routes

The hexachalcogenodistannates K₆[Sn^III₂Se₆] or Li₄[Sn^IV₂Te₆]·8en were recently reported to simultaneously act as mild oxidants and chalcogenide sources in reactions with CoCl₂/LiCp* (Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienide) while the Sn—E (E = Se, Te) fragment is not kept in the products, e.g. [(Cp*Co)₃(μ₃‐Se)₂], [(Cp*Co)₃(μ₃‐Se)₂][Cl₂Co(μ₂‐Cl)₂Li(thf)₂] or [(Cp*Co)₄(μ₃‐Te)₄]. In search of related reagents with possibly different reaction behavior, we isolated and crystallographically characterized isotypic compounds [enH]₄[Sn^IV₂Se₆]�en ( 1 ), and [enH]₄[Sn^IV₂Te₆]·en ( 2 ) (en = 1, 2‐diaminoethane), that result from an uncommon disproportion/re‐arrangement reaction: distannate(III) K₆[Sn₂E₆] (E = Se, Te) was reacted with en·2HCl to yield 1 or 2 under disproportion of Sn^III to Sn^II and Sn^IV. Another pathway was necessary to synthesize the respective but solvent‐free thiostannate [enH]₄ [Sn^IV₂S₆] ( 3 ), since the phase “K₆[Sn₂S₆]” is unknown. This second method started out from SnCl₄·2THF and S(SiMe₃)₂ in en solution. However, using E(SiMe₃)₂ (E = Se, Te) instead of S(SiMe₃)₂, 1 and 2 are also obtained this way. 1—3 are the first chalcogenostannates that exhibit exclusively [enH]⁺ counterions. The compounds were characterized by means of X‐ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. They seem to be suitable for reactions towards group 8‐10 metal complexes. Preliminary experiments indicate that the binary anions 1 — 3 coordinated by 1‐aminoethylammonium ions react more slowly compared to the anionic phases tested until now.     

Preparation of chalcogenolato-bridged dinuclear Tp*Rh-Cp*Ru complexes (Tp*= hydrotris(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)borate, Cp*=eta(5)-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) and binding of dioxygen to their Ru sites

Reactions of [Tp*Rh(coe)(MeCN)](1; Tp*= hydrotris(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl); coe = cyclooctene) with one equiv of diphenyl dichalcogenides PhEEPh (E = Se, Te) afforded the mononuclear Rh(III) complexes [Tp*Rh(EPh)(2)(MeCN)](2b: E = Se; 2c: E = Te), as reported previously for the formation of [Tp*Rh(SPh)(2)(MeCN)](2a) from the reaction of 1 and PhSSPh. Complexes 2a-2c were treated with the Ru(II) complex [(Cp*Ru)(4)(mu(3)-Cl)(4)](Cp*=eta(5)-C(5)Me(5)) in THF at room temperature, yielding the chalcogenolato-bridged dinuclear complexes [Tp*RhCl(mu-EPh)(2)RuCp*(MeCN)](3). Complex 3a (E = S) in solution was converted slowly into a mixture of 3a and the sterically less encumbered dinuclear complex [Tp*RhCl(SPh)(mu-eta(1)-S-eta(6)-Ph)RuCp*](4a) at room temperature. In 4a, one SPh group binds only to the Rh center as a terminal ligand, while the other SPh group bridges the Rh and Ru atoms by coordinating to the former at the S atom and to the latter with the Ph group in a pi fashion. The Se analogue 3b also underwent a similar transformation under more forcing conditions, e.g. in benzene at reflux, whereas formation of the mu-eta(1)-Te-eta(6)-Ph complex was not observed for the Te analogue 3c even under these forcing conditions. When complexes 3 was dissolved in THF exposed to air, the MeCN ligand bound to Ru was substituted by dioxygen to give the peroxo complexes [Tp*RhCl(mu-EPh)(2)RuCp*(eta(2)-O(2))](5a: E = S; 5b: E = Se; 5c: E = Te). X-Ray analyses have been undertaken to determine the detailed structures for 2c, 3a, 3b, 4a, 5a, 5b, and 5c.     

Organometallic Niobium and Tantalum Complexes with Primary Phosphine Ligands: Syntheses and Molecular Structures of [Cp*MCl4(PH2R)] (M = Nb,Ta; Cp* = C5Me5;R = But,Ad, Cy,Ph, 2, 4, 6‐Me3C6H2 (Mes))

The reaction of [Cp*MCl₄] (M = Nb, Ta; Cp* = C₅Me₅) with PH₂R in toluene at room temperature gives the primary phosphine complexes [Cp*MCl₄(PH₂R)] [Cp* = C₅Me₅; M = Nb: R = Bu^t ( 1a ), Ad ( 2a ), Cy ( 3a ), Ph ( 4a ), 2, 4, 6‐Me₃C₆H₂ (Mes) ( 5a ); M = Ta: R = Bu^t ( 1b ), Ad ( 2b ), Cy ( 3b ), Ph ( 4b ), Mes ( 5b )] in high yield. 1—5 were characterized spectroscopically (NMR, IR, MS) and by crystal structure determinations. The starting material [Cp*TaCl₄] is monomeric in the solid state, as shown by crystal structure determination.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Optical Properties of New Cadmium Chalcogenide Clusters of the Type [Cd10E4(E'Ph)12(PR3)4], (E,E' = Te,Se, S)

New cadmium chalcogenide cluster molecules [Cd₁₀E₄(E'Ph)₁₂(PⁿPr₃)₄], E = Te, E' = Te ( 1 ) and [Cd₁₀E₄(E'Ph)₁₂ (PⁿPr₂Ph)₄] E = Te, E' = Se ( 2 ); E = Te E' = S ( 3 ); E = Se, E' = S ( 4 ) have been synthesized and structurally characterized by single crystal X‐ray structure analysis. The influence of the variation of the chalcogen atom is investigated by structural means and by optical spectroscopy. All cluster‐molecules have a broad emission in the blue‐visible range at low temperature as indicated by photo luminescence (PL) measurements. A clear classification of the emission peak position can be made based on the E' species suggesting that the emission is assigned to transitions associated with the cluster surface ligands. Photoluminescence excitation and absorption measurements display a systematic shift of the band gap to the higher energies with the variation of E and E' from Te to Se to S, as also occurs in the respective series of the bulk semiconductors.     

Fine Tuning of Metallaborane Geometries: Chemistry of Metallaboranes of Early Transition Metals Derived from Metal Halides and Monoborane Reagents

Reaction of [Cp_nMCl_4?x] (M=V: n=x=2; M=Nb: n=1, x=0) or [Cp*TaCl₄] (Cp=η⁵‐C₅H₅, Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅), with [LiBH₄?thf] at ?70 °C followed by thermolysis at 85 °C in the presence of [BH₃?thf] yielded the hydrogen‐rich metallaboranes [(CpM)₂(B₂H₆)₂] ( 1 : M=V; 2 : M = Nb) and [(Cp*Ta)₂(B₂H₆)₂] ( 3 ) in modest to high yields. Complexes 1 and 3 are the first structurally characterized compounds with a metal–metal bond bridged by two hexahydroborate (B₂H₆) groups forming a symmetrical complex. Addition of [BH₃?thf] to 3 results in formation of a metallaborane [(Cp*Ta)₂B₄H₈(μ‐BH₄)] ( 4 ) containing a tetrahydroborate ligand, [BH₄]^?, bound exo to the bicapped tetrahedral cage [(Cp*Ta)₂B₄H₈] by two Ta‐H‐B bridge bonds. The interesting structural feature of 4 is the coordination of the bridging tetrahydroborate group, which has two B? H bonds coordinated to the tantalum atoms. All these new metallaboranes have been characterized by mass, ¹H, ¹¹B, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis and the structural types were established unequivocally by crystallographic analysis of 1 – 4 .     

η4‐HBCC‐σ,π‐Borataallyl Complexes of Ruthenium Comprising an Agostic Interaction

Thermolysis of [Cp*Ru(PPh₂(CH₂)PPh₂)BH₂(L₂)] 1 (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅; L=C₇H₄NS₂), with terminal alkynes led to the formation of η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complexes [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)B{R‐C=CH₂}(L)₂] ( 2 a – c ) and η²‐vinylborane complexes [Cp*Ru(R‐C=CH₂)BH(L)₂] ( 3 a – c ) ( 2 a , 3 a : R=Ph; 2 b , 3 b : R=COOCH₃; 2 c , 3 c : R=p‐CH₃‐C₆H₄; L=C₇H₄NS₂) through hydroboration reaction. Ruthenium and the HBCC unit of the vinylborane moiety in 2 a – c are linked by a unique η⁴‐interaction. Conversions of 1 into 3 a – c proceed through the formation of intermediates 2 a – c . Furthermore, in an attempt to expand the library of these novel complexes, chemistry of σ‐borane complex [Cp*RuCO(μ‐H)BH₂L] 4 (L=C₇H₄NS₂) was investigated with both internal and terminal alkynes. Interestingly, under photolytic conditions, 4 reacts with methyl propiolate to generate the η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complexes [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{R‐C=CH₂}(L)] 5 and [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{HC=CH‐R}(L)] 6 (R=COOCH₃; L=C₇H₄NS₂) by Markovnikov and anti‐Markovnikov hydroboration. In an extension, photolysis of 4 in the presence of dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate yielded η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complex [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{R‐C=CH‐R}(L)] 7 (R=COOCH₃; L=C₇H₄NS₂). An agostic interaction was also found to be present in 2 a – c and 5 – 7 , which is rare among the borataallyl complexes. All the new compounds have been characterized in solution by IR, ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and the structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of 2 b , 3 a – c and 5 – 7 . DFT calculations were performed to evaluate possible bonding and electronic structures of the new compounds.     

Syntheses and Characterization of New Vinyl‐Borylene Complexes by the Hydroboration of Alkynes with [(μ3‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)2(μ‐CO)Fe(CO)3]

Room temperature photolysis of a triply‐bridged borylene complex, [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO)Fe(CO)₃] ( 1 a ; Cp*=C₅Me₅), in the presence of a series of alkynes, 1,2‐diphenylethyne, 1‐phenyl‐1‐propyne, and 2‐butyne led to the isolation of unprecedented vinyl‐borylene complexes (Z)‐[(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO)B(CR)(CHR′)] ( 2 : R, R′=Ph; 3 : R=Me, R′=Ph; 4 : R, R′=Me). This reaction permits a hydroboration of alkyne through an anti ‐ Markovnikov addition. In stark contrast, in the presence of phenylacetylene, a metallacarborane, closo‐[1,2‐(Cp*Ru)₂(μ‐CO)₂{Fe₂(CO)₅}‐4‐Ph‐4,5‐C₂BH₂] ( 5 a) , is formed. A plausible mechanism has been proposed for the formation of vinyl‐borylene complexes, which is supported by density functional theory (DFT) methods. Furthermore, the calculated ¹¹B NMR chemical shifts accurately reflect the experimentally measured shifts. All the new compounds have been characterized in solution by mass spectrometry and IR, ¹H, ¹¹B, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies and the structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of 2 , 5 a , and 5 b .     

Sterically Less‐Hindered Half‐Titanocene(IV) Phenoxides: Ancillary‐Ligand Effect on Mono‐, Bis‐, and Tris(2‐Alkyl‐/arylphenoxy) Titanium(IV) Chloride Complexes

A series of mono‐, bis‐, and tris(phenoxy)–titanium(IV) chlorides of the type [Cp*Ti(2‐R? PhO)_nCl_3?n] (n=1–3; Cp*=pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) was prepared, in which R=Me, iPr, tBu, and Ph. The formation of each mono‐, bis‐, and tris(2‐alkyl‐/arylphenoxy) series was authenticated by structural studies on representative examples of the phenyl series including [Cp*Ti(2‐Ph? PhO)Cl₂] ( 1 PhCl2 ), [Cp*Ti(2‐Ph? PhO)₂Cl] ( 2 PhCl ), and [Cp*Ti(2‐Ph? PhO)₃] ( 3 Ph ). The metal‐coordination geometry of each compound is best described as pseudotetrahedral with the Cp* ring and the 2‐Ph? PhO and chloride ligands occupying three leg positions in a piano‐stool geometry. The mean Ti? O distances, observed with an increasing number of 2‐Ph? PhO groups, are 1.784(3), 1.802(4), and 1.799(3) Å for 1 PhCl2 , 2 PhCl , and 3 Ph , respectively. All four alkyl/aryl series with Me, iPr, tBu, and Ph substituents were tested for ethylene homopolymerization after activation with Ph₃C⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]^? and modified methyaluminoxane (7% aluminum in isopar E; mMAO‐7) at 140 °C. The phenyl series showed much higher catalytic activity, which ranged from 43.2 and 65.4 kg (mmol of Ti?h)^?1, than the Me, iPr, and tBu series (19.2 and 36.6 kg (mmol of Ti?h)^?1). Among the phenyl series, the bis(phenoxide) complex of 2 PhCl showed the highest activity of 65.4 kg (mmol of Ti?h)^?1. Therefore, the catalyst precursors of the phenyl series were examined by treating them with a variety of alkylating reagents, such as trimethylaluminum (TMA), triisobutylaluminum (TIBA), and methylaluminoxane (MAO). In all cases, 2 PhCl produced the most catalytically active alkylated species, [Cp*Ti(2‐Ph? PhO)MeCl]. This enhancement was further supported by DFT calculations based on the simplified model with TMA.     

Versatile reactivity of half-sandwich Ir and Rh complexes toward carboranylamidinates and their derivatives: synthesis, structure, and catalytic activity for norbornene polymerization

Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of carboranylamidinate‐based half‐sandwich iridium and rhodium complexes are reported for the first time. Treatment of dimeric metal complexes [{Cp*M(μ‐Cl)Cl}₂] (M=Ir, Rh; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with a solution of one equivalent of nBuLi and a carboranylamidine produces 18‐electron complexes [Cp*IrCl(Cab^N‐DIC)] ( 1 a ; Cab^N‐DIC=[iPrN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NHiPr)]), [Cp*RhCl(Cab^N‐DIC)] ( 1 b ), and [Cp*RhCl(Cab^N‐DCC)] ( 1 c ; Cab^N‐DCC=[CyN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NHCy)]). A series of 16‐electron half‐sandwich Ir and Rh complexes [Cp*Ir(Cab^N′‐DIC)] ( 2 a ; Cab^N′‐DIC=[iPrN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NiPr)]), [Cp*Ir(Cab^N′‐DCC)] ( 2 b , Cab^N′‐DCC=[CyN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NCy)]), and [Cp*Rh(Cab^N′‐DIC)] ( 2 c ) is also obtained when an excess of nBuLi is used. The unexpected products [Cp*M(Cab^N,S‐DIC)], [Cp*M(Cab^N,S‐DCC)] (M=Ir 3 a , 3 b ; Rh 3 c , 3 d ), formed through BH activation, are obtained by reaction of [{Cp*MCl₂}₂] with carboranylamidinate sulfides [RN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NHR)]S^? (R=iPr, Cy), which can be prepared by inserting sulfur into the C? Li bond of lithium carboranylamidinates. Iridium complex 1 a shows catalytic activities of up to 2.69×10⁶ g_PNB ${{\rm{mol}}_{{\rm{Ir}}}^{ - {\rm{1}}} }Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of carboranylamidinate-based half-sandwich iridium and rhodium complexes are reported for the first time. Treatment of dimeric metal complexes [{Cp*M(μ-Cl)Cl}(2)] (M = Ir, Rh; Cp* = η(5)-C(5)Me(5)) with a solution of one equivalent of nBuLi and a carboranylamidine produces 18-electron complexes [Cp*IrCl(Cab(N)-DIC)] (1?a; Cab(N)-DIC = [iPrN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NHiPr)]), [Cp*RhCl(Cab(N)-DIC)] (1?b), and [Cp*RhCl(Cab(N)-DCC)] (1?c; Cab(N)-DCC = [CyN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NHCy)]). A series of 16-electron half-sandwich Ir and Rh complexes [Cp*Ir(Cab(N')-DIC)] (2?a; Cab(N')-DIC = [iPrN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NiPr)]), [Cp*Ir(Cab(N')-DCC)] (2?b, Cab(N')-DCC = [CyN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10)(NCy)]), and [Cp*Rh(Cab(N')-DIC)] (2?c) is also obtained when an excess of nBuLi is used. The unexpected products [Cp*M(Cab(N,S)-DIC)], [Cp*M(Cab(N,S)-DCC)] (M = Ir 3?a, 3?b; Rh 3?c, 3?d), formed through BH activation, are obtained by reaction of [{Cp*MCl(2)}(2)] with carboranylamidinate sulfides [RN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NHR)]S(-) (R = iPr, Cy), which can be prepared by inserting sulfur into the C-Li bond of lithium carboranylamidinates. Iridium complex 1?a shows catalytic activities of up to 2.69×10(6) g(PNB) mol(Ir)(-1) h(-1) for the polymerization of norbornene in the presence of methylaluminoxane (MAO) as cocatalyst. Catalytic activities and the molecular weight of polynorbornene (PNB) were investigated under various reaction conditions. All complexes were fully characterized by elemental analysis and IR and NMR spectroscopy; the structures of 1?a-c, 2?a, b; and 3?a, b, d were further confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Nucleophilic Attack at Pentaarsaferrocene [Cp*Fe(η5-As5)]—The Way to Larger Polyarsenide Ligands

By the reaction of [Cp*Fe(η⁵-As₅)] ( I ) (Cp*=C₅Me₅) with main group nucleophiles, unique functionalized products with η⁴-coordinated polyarsenide (As_n) units (n=5, 6, 20) are obtained. With carbon-based nucleophiles such as MeLi or KBn (Bn=CH₂Ph), the anionic organo-substituted polyarsenide complexes, [Li(2.2.2-cryptand)][Cp*Fe(η⁴-As₅Me)] ( 1 a ) and [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][Cp*Fe{η⁴-As₅(CH₂Ph)}] ( 1 b ), are accessible. The use of KAsPh₂ leads to a selective and controlled extension of the As₅ unit and the formation of the monoanionic compound [K(2.2.2-cryptand][Cp*Fe(η⁴-As₆Ph₂)] ( 2 ). When I is reacted with [M]As(SiMe₃)₂ (M=Li ⋅ THF; K), the formation of the largest known anionic polyarsenide unit in [M′(2.2.2-cryptand)]₂[(Cp*Fe)₄{μ₅-η⁴:η⁴:η³:η³:η¹:η¹-As₂₀}] ( 3 ) occurred (M′=Li ( 3 a ), K ( 3 b )).     

Syntheses and Structures of Facial and Meridional Stereoisomers of κ2-N,S-Chelated Ruthenium Borate Complexes

The trans-mer-[(κ²-N,S-NS₂C₇H₄)PR₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-H₂B (NS₂C₇H₄)₂}], (trans-mer -1 a : R=Cy; trans-mer -1 b : R=Ph) complexes are kinetically controlled products that upon thermolysis led to the formation of cis-mer-[(κ²-N,S-NS₂C₇H₄)PR₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-H₂B(NS₂C₇H₄)₂}], (cis-mer- 2 a : R=Cy; cis-mer- 2 b : R=Ph) and cis-fac-[(κ²-N,S-NS₂C₇H₄)PR₃Ru{κ³-H,S,S′-H₂B(NS₂C₇H₄)₂}], (cis-fac- 3 a : R=Cy; cis-fac- 3 b : R=Ph) along with complex cis-[(κ²-N,S-NS₂C₇H₄)₂Ru(PPh₃)₂], (cis- 4 ). One of the main intentions of this study was to examine the flexibility of the borate and hemilabile N,S-chelating mercapto-benzothiazole ligands in adapting different spatial arrangements around metal center. Multinuclear spectroscopic analyses have been done to characterize all new complexes and the structures were further confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Further, Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations were performed to provide an insight into the bonding of the complexes.     

Syntheses,Structures, and Electronic Properties of Mono- and Bimetallic Thiolato Complexes Containing Unusual Coordination Modes of Thiolato Ligands

Synthesis, bonding and chemistry of mono- and bimetallic complexes supported by chelating thiolato ligands have been established. Treatment of [Cp*VCl₂]₃ ( 1 ) with [LiBH₄ ⋅ THF] followed by the addition of ethane-1,2-dithiol led to the formation of an EPR active bimetallic vanadium thiolato complex [(Cp*V){μ-(SCH₂CH₂S)-κ²S,S′)₂{V(SCH₂CH₂S-SH)}] ( 2 ). In complex 2 , two ethane-1,2-dithiolato ligands are symmetrically coordinated to two vanadium atoms through μ-S atoms. Interestingly, when similar reactions were carried out with heavier group 5 metal precursors, such as [Cp*NbCl₄] ( 3 a ), it afforded monometallic thiolato complex [Cp*Nb(SCH₂CH₂S)(SCH₂CH₂S−CH₂S)] ( 4 a ). On the other hand, the Ta-analogue [Cp*TaCl₄] ( 3 b ) yielded thiolato species [Cp*Ta(SCH₂CH₂S)(SCH₂CH₂S−CH₂S)] ( 4 b ) and [Cp*Ta(SCH₂CH₂S) (SCH₂CH₂S−S)] ( 5 ). In complexes 4 a and 4 b , one ethane-1,2-dithiolato and one trithiolato ligand are coordinated to Nb and Ta centers, respectively. Whereas, in complex 5 , one ethane-1,2-dithiolato and one 2-disulfanylethanethiolato is coordinated to the Ta center. Moreover, the photolytic reaction of 5 with [Mo(CO)₅ ⋅ THF] yielded heterobimetallic thiolato complex [(Cp*Ta){μ-(SCH₂CH₂S)-κ²S,S′}{μ-(SCH₂CH₂S−CH₂(CH₃)S)κ²S′′ : κ¹S-′′′′ : κ¹S′′′′′}{Mo(CO)₃}] ( 6 ). All the complexes have been characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. Further, computational analyses were performed to provide an insight into the bonding of these complexes.     

Synthese und Kristallstruktur des ersten Cp*‐geschützten Cobalttelluridclusters: Darstellung von [(Cp*Co)4(μ3‐Te)4] durch milde Oxidation von [Cp*CoCl]2 mittels Li4Sn2Te6 · 8 en

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the First Known Cp* Ligated Cobalt Telluride Cluster: Mild Oxidation of [Cp*CoCl]₂ by Li₄Sn₂Te₆ · 8 en to give [(Cp*Co)₄(μ₃‐Te)₄] Oxidation of cobalt(II) complex [Cp*CoCl]₂ (Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadiene) with binary Zintl polyanion hexatellurodistannate(IV) [Sn₂Te₆]^4– in Li₄Sn₂Te₆ · 8 en (en = 1,2‐diaminoethane) leads to the formation of the first Cp* ligated cobalt telluride cluster [(Cp*Co)₄(μ₃‐Te)₄]. The compound crystallizes as black cuboids that are suitable for X‐ray structural analysis. Space group P 1, lattice dimensions at 203 K: a = 1127.9(2), b = 1156.2(3), c = 1882.3(4) pm, α = 83.27(2), β = 83.24(2), γ = 66.11(1)°, V = 2222.3(9) · 10⁶ pm³, R₁ = 0.0681. The molecular structure of the compound features a Co₄Te₄ heterocubane and thus distributes to the completion of the series of known transition metal chalcogenide heterocubanes.     

Terminal Alkynes in the Coordination Sphere of Titanocene Complexes – Elementary Steps in Catalytic Dimerizations and Oligomerizations of Alkynes

The titanocene acetylene complex [Cp*₂Ti(η²-Me₃SiC≡CSiMe₃)] ( 14 ) reacts with 1-alkynes such as phenylacetylene ( 15 a ), 1-hexyne ( 15 b ), 1-dodecyne ( 15 c ) and trimethylsilylacetylene ( 15 d ) by ligand exchange and proton shift, to yield exclusively the 1-alkenyltitanocene acetylides [Cp*₂Ti(CH=CHR)(C≡CR)] ( 21 ) (R = Ph ( 21 a ), CH₃(CH₂)₃ ( 21 b ), CH₃(CH₂)₉ ( 21 c ), SiMe₃ ( 21 d )). The X-ray structure of 21 a is presented. In reaction of acetylene HC≡CH ( 15 e ) with 14 other products are formed. However, no intermediates, like [Cp*₂Ti(η²-RC≡CH)] ( 17 ), [Cp*₂Ti(H)C≡CR] ( 17 ) or [Cp*₂Ti=C=CHR] ( 22 ) in reactions of 14 with 15 are detectable. On the other hand, a stable titanocenehydride [Cp*₂Ti(H)OCH₃] ( 23 ) is obtained by oxidative addition of CH₃OH with Cp*₂Ti, generated from 14 .     

Synthesis and structure of heterometallic complexes (RhFe, CoFe) containing bridging 1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecarborane-1,2-dichalcogenolato ligands

The prototype hetero-binuclear complexes containing metal-metal bonds, {CpRh[E2C2(B10H10)]}[Fe(CO)3] (Cp = Cp* = eta 5-Me5C5, E = S(5a), Se(5b); Cp = Cp = eta 5-1,3-tBu2C5H3, E = S(6a), Se(6b)) and {CpCo[E2C2(B10H10)]}[Fe(CO)3] (Cp = Cp* = eta 5-Me5C5, E = S(7a), Se(7b); Cp = Cp = eta 5-C5H5, E = S(8a), Se(8b)) were obtained from the reactions of 16-electron complexes CpRh[E2C2(B10H10)] (Cp = Cp*, E = S(1a), Se(1b); Cp = Cp, E = S(2a), Se(2b)), CpCo[E2C2(B10H10)] (Cp = Cp*, E = S(3a), Se(3b); Cp = Cp, E = S(4a), Se(4b)) with Fe(CO)5 in the presence of Me3NO. The molecular structures of {Cp*Rh[E2C2(B10H10)]}[Fe(CO)3] (E = S(5a), Se(5b)), {CpRh[S2C2(B10H10)]}[Fe(CO)3] (6a) {Cp*Co[S2C2(B10H10)]}[Fe(CO)3] (7a) and {CpCo[S2C2(B10H10)]}[Fe(CO)3] (8a) have been determined by X-ray crystallography. All these complexes were characterized by elemental analysis and IR and NMR spectra.