P?C‐Activated Bimetallic Rhodium Xantphos Complexes: Formation and Catalytic Dehydrocoupling of Amine–Boranes

{Rh(xantphos)}‐based phosphido dimers form by P C activation of xantphos (4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene) in the presence of amine–boranes. These dimers are active dehydrocoupling catalysts, forming polymeric [H₂BNMeH]_n from H₃B⋅NMeH₂ and dimeric [H₂BNMe₂]₂ from H₃B⋅NMe₂H at low catalyst loadings (0.1 mol %). Mechanistic investigations support a dimeric active species, suggesting that bimetallic catalysis may be possible in amine–borane dehydropolymerization.     

Ir(PCy3)2(H)2(H2B-NMe2)]+ as a latent source of aminoborane: probing the role of metal in the dehydrocoupling of H3B⋅NMe2H and retrodimerisation of [H2BNMe2]2

The Ir^III fragment {Ir(PCy₃)₂(H)₂}⁺ has been used to probe the role of the metal centre in the catalytic dehydrocoupling of H₃B?NMe₂H ( A ) to ultimately give dimeric aminoborane [H₂BNMe₂]₂ ( D ). Addition of A to [Ir(PCy₃)₂(H)₂(H₂)₂][BAr^F₄] ( 1 ; Ar^F=(C₆H₃(CF₃)₂), gives the amine‐borane complex [Ir(PCy₃)₂(H)₂(H₃B?NMe₂H)][BAr^F₄] ( 2 a ), which slowly dehydrogenates to afford the aminoborane complex [Ir(PCy₃)₂(H)₂(H₂B? NMe₂)][BAr^F₄] ( 3 ). DFT calculations have been used to probe the mechanism of dehydrogenation and show a pathway featuring sequential BH activation/H₂ loss/NH activation. Addition of D to 1 results in retrodimerisation of D to afford 3 . DFT calculations indicate that this involves metal trapping of the monomer–dimer equilibrium, 2 H₂BNMe₂ ? [H₂BNMe₂]₂. Ruthenium and rhodium analogues also promote this reaction. Addition of MeCN to 3 affords [Ir(PCy₃)₂(H)₂(NCMe)₂][BAr^F₄] ( 6 ) liberating H₂B? NMe₂ ( B ), which then dimerises to give D . This is shown to be a second‐order process. It also allows on‐ and off‐metal coupling processes to be probed. Addition of MeCN to 3 followed by A gives D with no amine‐borane intermediates observed. Addition of A to 3 results in the formation of significant amounts of oligomeric H₃B?NMe₂BH₂?NMe₂H ( C ), which ultimately was converted to D . These results indicate that the metal is involved in both the dehydrogenation of A , to give B , and the oligomerisation reaction to afford C . A mechanism is suggested for this latter process. The reactivity of oligomer C with the Ir complexes is also reported. Addition of excess C to 1 promotes its transformation into D , with 3 observed as the final organometallic product, suggesting a B? N bond cleavage mechanism. Complex 6 does not react with C , but in combination with B oligomer C is consumed to eventually give D , suggesting an additional role for free aminoborane in the formation of D from C .     

Oxygen Reduction with a Bifunctional Iridium Dihydride Complex

The iridium dihydride [Ir(H)₂(HPNP)]⁺ (PNP=N(CH₂CH₂PtBu₂)₂) reacts with O₂ to give the unusual, square‐planar iridium(III) hydroxide [Ir(OH)(PNP)]⁺ and water. Regeneration of the dihydride with H₂ closes a quasi‐catalytic synthetic oxygen‐reduction reaction (ORR) cycle that can be run several times. Experimental and computational examinations are in agreement with an oxygenation mechanism via rate‐limiting O₂ coordination followed by H‐transfer at a single metal site, facilitated by the cooperating pincer ligand. Hence, the four electrons required for the ORR are stored within the two covalent M? H bonds of a mononuclear metal complex.     

An Intramolecular Silylene Borane Capable of Facile Activation of Small Molecules,Including Metal‐Free Dehydrogenation of Water

The first single‐component N‐heterocyclic silylene borane 1 (LSi‐R‐BMes₂; L=PhC(N^t Bu)₂; R=1,12‐xanthendiyl spacer; Mes=2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂), acting as a frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) in small‐molecule activation, can be synthesized in 65 % yields. Its HOMO is largely localized at the silicon(II) atom and the LUMO has mainly boron 2p character. In small‐molecule activation 1 allows access to the intramolecular silanone–borane 3 featuring a Si=O→B interaction through reaction with O₂, N₂O, or CO₂, and formation of silanethione borane 4 from reaction with S₈. The Si^II center in 1 undergoes immediate hydrogenation if exposed to H₂ at 1 atm pressure in benzene, affording the silane borane 5‐H₂ , L(H₂)Si‐R‐BMes₂. Remarkably, no H₂ activation occurs if the single silylene LSiPh and Mes₃B intermolecularly separated are exposed to dihydrogen. Unexpectedly, the pre‐organized Si–B separation in 1 enables a metal‐free dehydrogenation of H₂O to give the silanone–borane 3 as reactive intermediate.     

An Intramolecular Silylene Borane Capable of Facile Activation of Small Molecules,Including Metal‐Free Dehydrogenation of Water

The first single‐component N‐heterocyclic silylene borane 1 (LSi‐R‐BMes₂; L=PhC(N^t Bu)₂; R=1,12‐xanthendiyl spacer; Mes=2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂), acting as a frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) in small‐molecule activation, can be synthesized in 65 % yields. Its HOMO is largely localized at the silicon(II) atom and the LUMO has mainly boron 2p character. In small‐molecule activation 1 allows access to the intramolecular silanone–borane 3 featuring a Si=O→B interaction through reaction with O₂, N₂O, or CO₂, and formation of silanethione borane 4 from reaction with S₈. The Si^II center in 1 undergoes immediate hydrogenation if exposed to H₂ at 1 atm pressure in benzene, affording the silane borane 5‐H₂ , L(H₂)Si‐R‐BMes₂. Remarkably, no H₂ activation occurs if the single silylene LSiPh and Mes₃B intermolecularly separated are exposed to dihydrogen. Unexpectedly, the pre‐organized Si–B separation in 1 enables a metal‐free dehydrogenation of H₂O to give the silanone–borane 3 as reactive intermediate.     

Manganese‐σ‐Borane Complexes from Dihaloboranes

The hydride complex K[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)₂H] reacted with a range of dihalo(organyl)boranes X₂BR (X = Cl, Br; R = tBu,Mes, Ferrocenyl) to give the corresponding borane complexes[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)₂(HB(X)R)]., The presence of a hydride in bridging position between manganese and boron was deduced from ¹¹B decoupled ¹H NMR spectra. Additionally, the structure of the tert‐butyl borane complex was confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

The Simplest Amino‐borane H2B=NH2 Trapped on a Rhodium Dimer: Pre‐Catalysts for Amine–Borane Dehydropolymerization

The μ‐amino–borane complexes [Rh₂(L^R)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐H₂B=NHR′)][BAr^F₄] (L^R=R₂P(CH₂)₃PR₂; R=Ph, ⁱPr; R′=H, Me) form by addition of H₃B?NMeR′H₂ to [Rh(L^R)(η⁶‐C₆H₅F)][BAr^F₄]. DFT calculations demonstrate that the amino–borane interacts with the Rh centers through strong Rh‐H and Rh‐B interactions. Mechanistic investigations show that these dimers can form by a boronium‐mediated route, and are pre‐catalysts for amine‐borane dehydropolymerization, suggesting a possible role for bimetallic motifs in catalysis.     

Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ammonia Borane Mediated by a Pt(0)/Borane Frustrated Lewis Pair: Theoretical Design

A new efficient metal-based frustrated Lewis pair constructed by (P^tBu₃)₂Pt and B(C₆F₅)₃ was designed through density functional theory calculations for the catalytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane (AB). The reaction was composed by the successive dehydrogenation of AB and H₂ liberation, which occurs through the cooperative functions of the Pt(0) center and the B(C₆F₅)₃ moiety. Two equivalents of H₂ were predicted to be liberated from each AB molecule. The generation of the second H2 is the rate-determining step, with a Gibbs energy barrier and reaction energy of 27.4 and 12.8 kcal/mol, respectively.     

Access to FeII Bis(σ‐B−H) Aminoborane Complexes through Protonation of a Borohydride Complex and Dehydrogenation of Amine‐Boranes

Herein, we report on the first synthesis and structural characterization of the iron based aminoborane complexes [Fe(PNP)(H)(η²:η²‐H₂B=NR₂)]⁺ (R=H, Me). These species are formed upon protonation of the borohydride complex [Fe(PNP)(H)(η²‐BH₄)] by ammonium salts [NH₂R₂]⁺ (R=H, Me). For R=Me, the reaction proceeds via the cationic dinuclear intermediate [{Fe(PNP)(H)}₂(μ²,η²:η²‐BH₄)]⁺. A mechanism for the reaction is proposed based on DFT calculations that also indicate the final aminoborane complex as the thermodynamic product. All complexes were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, HRMS, and X‐ray crystallography.     

Benzyl Borane NHC Adducts: Beyond B−C Bond Scission

Benzyl-substituted boronates and borates are widely employed as mild sources in radical or anionic transfer reactions of benzyl entities. In this process the B−C bond to the benzyl moiety is essentially ruptured. In contrast, reactions with retention of the B−C bond are poorly investigated although several other reactive sites in benzyl–boron systems are clearly inherent. In this respect, the novel reactivity of the representative borane adduct IiPr−BH₂Bn [IiPr=:C{N(iPr)CH}₂, Bn=CH₂C₆H₅] is demonstrated. Dihalogenation of the BH₂ entity is observed with BCl₃ and BBr₃, whereas BI₃ either affords IiPr−BHI₂ or proceeds with borylation of the aromatic phenyl ring to give a hydride-bridged bisborylated species. The photochemical mono- and dihalogenation of the benzylic CH₂ group was demonstrated with elemental bromine Br₂. The brominated product IiPr−BBr₂−CHBr−C₆H₅ was borylated at the benzylic carbon atom in an umpolung event with BI₃ to afford the zwitterion IiPr−BI−CH(BI₃)−C₆H₅.     

PC‐Activated Bimetallic Rhodium Xantphos Complexes: Formation and Catalytic Dehydrocoupling of Amine–Boranes

{Rh(xantphos)}‐based phosphido dimers form by P? C activation of xantphos (4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene) in the presence of amine–boranes. These dimers are active dehydrocoupling catalysts, forming polymeric [H₂BNMeH]_n from H₃B?NMeH₂ and dimeric [H₂BNMe₂]₂ from H₃B?NMe₂H at low catalyst loadings (0.1 mol %). Mechanistic investigations support a dimeric active species, suggesting that bimetallic catalysis may be possible in amine–borane dehydropolymerization.     

On the Use of Amine–Borane Complexes To Synthesize Iron Nanoparticles

The effectiveness of amine–borane as reducing agent for the synthesis of iron nanoparticles has been investigated. Large (2–4 nm) Fe nanoparticles were obtained from [Fe{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂]. Inclusion of boron in the nanoparticles is clearly evidenced by extended X‐ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy and Mössbauer spectrometry. Furthermore, the reactivity of amine–borane and amino–borane complexes in the presence of pure Fe nanoparticles has been investigated. Dihydrogen evolution was observed in both cases, which suggests the potential of Fe nanoparticles to promote the release of dihydrogen from amine–borane and amino–borane moieties.     

An Ethylene‐Bridged Phosphane/Borane Frustrated Lewis Pair Featuring the ‐B(Fxyl)2 Lewis Acid Component

Hydroboration of dimesitylvinylphosphane with bis[3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borane [HB(Fxyl)₂] gave the intramolecular ethylene‐bridged P/B frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) Mes₂PCH₂CH₂B(Fxyl)₂. The new compound underwent a variety of typical FLP reactions such as P/B‐addition to the carbonyl group of p‐chloro‐benzaldehyde. Cooperative N,N‐addition to nitric oxide gave the respective persistent P/B FLPNO^. radical, which readily reacted with 1,4‐cyclohexadiene by H‐atom abstraction to yield the corresponding P/B FLPNOH product. The B(Fxyl)₂‐containing FLP reacted as a template for the HB(C₆F₅)₂ reduction of carbon monoxide to the formyl stage to give the respective FLP(η²‐formylborane) product. Most products were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystal structure analysis.     

Amine–Borane Dehydropolymerization: Challenges and Opportunities

The dehydropolymerization of amine–boranes, exemplified as H₂RB⋅NR′H₂, to produce polyaminoboranes (HRBNR′H)_n that are inorganic analogues of polyolefins with alternating main-chain B−N units, is an area with significant potential, stemming from both fundamental (mechanism, catalyst development, main-group hetero-cross-coupling) and technological (new polymeric materials) opportunities. This Concept article outlines recent advances in the field, covering catalyst development and performance, current mechanistic models, and alternative non-catalytic routes for polymer production. The substrate scope, polymer properties and applications of these exciting materials are also outlined. Challenges and opportunities in the field are suggested, as a way of providing focus for future investigations.     

“Activated Borane” – A Porous Borane Cluster Network as an Effective Adsorbent for Removing Organic Pollutants

The unprecedented co-thermolysis of decaborane(14) (nido-B₁₀H₁₄) and toluene results in a novel porous material (that we have named “activated borane”) containing micropores between 1.0 and 1.5 nm in diameter and a specific surface area of 774 m² g⁻¹ (Ar, 87 K) that is thermally stable up to 1000 °C. Solid state ¹H, ¹¹B and ¹³C MAS NMR, UV-vis and IR spectroscopies suggest an amorphous structure of borane clusters interconnected by toluene moieties in a ratio of about three toluene molecules for every borane cluster. In addition, the structure contains Lewis-acidic tri-coordinated boron sites giving it some unique properties. Activated borane displays high sorption capacity for pollutants such as sulfamethoxazole, tramadol, diclofenac and bisphenol A that exceed the capacity of commercially-available activated carbon. The consistency in properties for each batch made, and the ease of its synthesis, make activated borane a promising porous material worthy of broad attention.     

A Germylene/Borane Lewis Pair and the Remarkable C=O Bond Cleavage Reaction toward Isocyanate and Ketone Molecules

A germylene/borane Lewis pair ( 2 ) was prepared from a 1,1‐carboboration of amidinato phenylethynylgermylene ( 1 ) by B(C₆F₅)₃. Compound 2 reacted with iPrNCO and (4‐MeOC₆H₄)C(O)Me, respectively, with cleavage of the C=O double bond. In the first instance, O and iPrNC insert separately into the Ge?B bond to yield a GeBC₂O‐heterocycle ( 3 ) and a GeBC₃‐heterocycle ( 4 ). In the second case (4‐MeOC₆H₄)(Me)C inserts into the Ge?N bond of 2 while O is incorporated in the Ge?B bond to form a Ge‐centered spiroheterocycle ( 5 ). The reaction of 2 with tBuNC to give 6 , which has almost the same structure as 4 , proved the formation of the isonitrile during transformation from 2 and iPrNCO to 3 and 4 . The kinetic study of the reaction of 2 and iPrNCO gave evidence of proceeding through a GeBC₃O‐heterocycle intermediate. In addition, a DFT study was performed to elucidate the reaction mechanism.     

Phosphoramidate‐Supported Cp*IrIII Aminoborane H2B=NR2 Complexes: Synthesis,Structure, and Solution Dynamics

Reaction of aminoboranes H₂B=NR₂ (R=iPr or Cy) with the cationic Cp*Ir^III phosphoramidate complex [IrCp*{κ²‐N,O‐Xyl(N)P(O)(OEt)₂}][BAr^F₄] generates the aminoborane complexes [IrCp*(H){κ¹‐N‐η²‐HB‐Xyl(N)P(OBHNR₂)(OEt)₂}][BAr^F₄] (R=iPr or Cy) in which coordination of a P=O bond with boron weakens the B=N multiple bond. For these complexes, solution‐ and solid‐state, as well as DFT computational techniques, have been employed to substantiate B?N bond rotation of the coordinated aminoborane.     

Platinum Complexes of a Borane‐Appended Analogue of 1,1′‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene: Flexible Borane Coordination Modes and in situ Vinylborane Formation

A bis(phosphine)borane ambiphilic ligand, [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)(η⁵‐C₅H₄PtBu{C₆H₄(BPh₂)‐ortho})] (FcPPB), in which the borane occupies a terminal position, was prepared. Reaction of FcPPB with tris(norbornene)platinum(0) provided [Pt(FcPPB)] ( 1 ) in which the arylborane is η³BCC‐coordinated. Subsequent reaction with CO and CNXyl (Xyl=2,6‐dimethylphenyl) afforded [PtL(FcPPB)] {L=CO ( 2 ) and CNXyl ( 3 )} featuring η²BC‐ and η¹B‐arylborane coordination modes, respectively. Reaction of 1 or 2 with H₂ yielded [PtH(μ‐H)(FcPPB)] in which the borane is bound to a hydride ligand on platinum. Addition of PhC₂H to [Pt(FcPPB)] afforded [Pt(C₂Ph)(μ‐H)(FcPPB)] ( 5 ), which rapidly converted to [Pt(FcPPB′)] ( 6 ; FcPPB′=[Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)(η⁵‐C₅H₄PtBu{C₆H₄(BPh‐CPh=CHPh‐Z)‐ortho}]) in which the newly formed vinylborane is η³BCC‐coordinated. Unlike arylborane complex 1 , vinylborane complex 6 does not react with CO, CNXyl, H₂ or HC₂Ph at room temperature.     

Borane Adducts of Hydrazoic Acid and Organic Azides: Intermediates for the Formation of Aminoboranes

The reaction of HN₃ with the strong Lewis acid B(C₆F₅)₃ led to the formation of a very labile HN₃?B(C₆F₅)₃ adduct, which decomposed to an aminoborane, H(C₆F₅)NB(C₆F₅)₂, above ?20 °C with release of molecular nitrogen and simultaneous migration of a C₆F₅ group from boron to the nitrogen atom. The intermediary formation of azide–borane adducts with B(C₆F₅)₃ was also demonstrated for a series of organic azides, RN₃ (R=Me₃Si, Ph, 3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃), which also underwent Staudinger‐like decomposition along with C₆F₅ group migration. In accord with experiment, computations revealed rather small barriers towards nitrogen release for these highly labile azide adducts for all organic substituents except R=Me₃Si (m.p. 120 °C, T_dec=189 °C). Hydrolysis of the aminoboranes provided C₆F₅‐substituted amines, HN(R)(C₆F₅), in good yields.     

Mononuclear and Terminal Zirconium and Hafnium Methylidenes

The dimethyl aryloxide complexes [(PNP)M(CH₃)₂(OAr)] (M=Zr or Hf; PNP^?=N[2‐P(CHMe₂)₂‐4‐methylphenyl]₂); Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃), which were readily prepared from [(PNP)M(CH₃)₃] by alcoholysis with HOAr, undergo photolytically induced α‐hydrogen abstraction to cleanly produce complexes [(PNP)M=CH₂(OAr)] with terminal methylidene ligands. These unique systems have been fully characterized, including the determination of a solid‐state structure in the case of M=Zr.