Bounded turning and quasiconformal maps

We considern-dimensional quasiconformal maps of an arbitrary domain onto a domain with specific properties and prove various results related to the Hayman-Wu theorem.     

Alternate compactifications of the moduli space of genus one maps

We extend the definition of an m-stable curve introduced by Smyth to the setting of maps to a projective variety X, generalizing the definition of a Kontsevich stable map in genus one. We prove that the moduli problem of n-pointed m-stable genus one maps of class β is representable by a proper Deligne–Mumford stack ${\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{1,n}^{m}(X,\beta)}$ over Spec ${\mathbb {Z}[1/6]}$ . For ${X=\mathbb {P}^{r},}$ we show that ${\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{1,n}^{m}(\mathbb {P}^{r},d)}$ is irreducible for m sufficiently large. We also show that ${\overline{\mathcal {M}}_{1,n}^{m}(\mathbb {P}^r,d)}$ is smooth if d?+?n ≤ m ≤ 5.     

A tropical view on Bruhat-Tits buildings and their compactifications

We relate some features of Bruhat-Tits buildings and their compactifications to tropical geometry. If G is a semisimple group over a suitable non-Archimedean field, the stabilizers of points in the Bruhat-Tits building of G and in some of its compactifications are described by tropical linear algebra. The compactifications we consider arise from algebraic representations of G. We show that the fan which is used to compactify an apartment in this theory is given by the weight polytope of the representation and that it is related to the tropicalization of the hypersurface given by the character of the representation.     

Submaximal and door compactifications

In this paper, a characterization is given for compact door spaces. We, also, deal with spaces X such that a compactification K(X) of X is submaximal or door.Let X be a topological space and K(X) be a compactification of X.We prove, here, that K(X) is submaximal if and only if for each dense subset D of X, the following properties hold:

(i)

D is co-finite in K(X);

(ii)

for each x∈K(X)?D, {x} is closed.

If X is a noncompact space, then we show that K(X) is a door space if and only if X is a discrete space and K(X) is the one-point compactification of X.     

Noninvertible maps and their embedding into higher dimensional invertible maps

The first part is devoted to a presentation of specific features of noninvertible maps with respect to the invertible ones. When embedded into a three-dimensional invertible map, the specific dynamical features of a plane noninvertible map are the germ of the three-dimensional dynamics, at least for sufficiently small absolute values of the embedding parameter. The form of the paper, as well as its contents, is approached from a non abstract point of view, in an elementary form from a simple class of examples.     

Hausdorff compactifications and lebesgue sets

Let X be a completely regular Hausdorff space and let H be a subset of C¹(X) which separates points and closed sets. By embedding X into a cube whose factors are indexed by H, a Hausdorff compactification e_HX of X is obtained. Given two subsets F and G of C¹(X) which separate points from closed sets, in the present paper we obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for the equivalence of e_FX and e_GX. The condition is expressed in terms of the space X and the sets F and G alone, herewith solving a question raised by Chandler.     

Hausdorff compactifications and Wallman spaces

Acta Mathematica Hungarica -     

Exponentially harmonic maps and their properties

We show that the associated quadratic differentials of exponentially harmonic maps are holomorphic under certain circumstance. We study the sufficient and necessary conditions for axially symmetric maps which are exponentially harmonic. We investigate exponentially harmonic equations for rotationally symmetric maps between rotationally symmetric manifolds of low dimensions.     

On biharmonic maps and their generalizations

We give a new proof of regularity of biharmonic maps from four-dimensional domains into spheres, showing first that the biharmonic map system is equivalent to a set of bilinear identities in divergence form. The method of reverse Hölder inequalities is used next to prove continuity of solutions and higher integrability of their second order derivatives. As a byproduct, we also prove that a weak limit of biharmonic maps into a sphere is again biharmonic. The proof of regularity can be adapted to biharmonic maps on the Heisenberg group, and to other functionals leading to fourth order elliptic equations with critical nonlinearities in lower order derivatives.Received: 6 February 2003, Accepted: 12 March 2003, Published online: 16 May 2003Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 35J60, 35H20Pawel Strzelecki: Current address (till September 2003): Mathematisches Institut der Universität Bonn, Beringstr. 1, 53115 Bonn, Germany (email: strzelec@math.uni-bonn.de). The author is partially supported by KBN grant no. 2-PO3A-028-22;he gratefully acknowledgesthe hospitality of his colleagues from Bonn,and the generosity of Humboldt Foundation.     

Reversible maps and their symmetry lines

In this paper, we present some methods to determine whether a planar map is reversible. Using these methods, we show that four automorphisms are reversible including Cremona map, cubic Hénon map, Knuth map and McMillan map. Some of them are not polynomial automorphism. We give the recurrence formulas of their symmetry lines, draw their phase portraits and symmetry lines with MATLAB software. Some special properties of their symmetry lines are explained and their beauties are also visually displayed.     

Fixed point compactifications

A fixed point compactification of a locally compact noncompact group G is a faithful semigroup compactification S such that \(ap=pa=p\) for all \(p\in S\setminus G\) and \(a\in G\). Since the right translations are continuous, the remainder of a fixed point compactification is a right zero semigroup. Among all fixed point compactifications of G there is a largest one, denoted \(\theta G\). We show that if G is \(\sigma \)-compact, then \(\theta G\setminus G\) contains a copy of \(\beta \omega \setminus \omega \). In contrast, if G is not \(\sigma \)-compact, then \(\theta G\) is the one-point compactification.