共查询到3条相似文献,搜索用时 3 毫秒
1.
Nanotechnology and the public: Effectively communicating nanoscale science and engineering concepts 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
O. M. Castellini G. K. Walejko C. E. Holladay T. J. Theim G. M. Zenner W. C. Crone 《Journal of nanoparticle research》2007,9(2):183-189
Researchers are faced with challenges when addressing the public on concepts and applications associated with nanotechnology.
The goal of our work was to understand the public’s knowledge of nanotechnology in order to identify appropriate starting
points for dialog. Survey results showed that people lack true understanding of concepts associated with atoms and the size
of the nanoscale regime. Such gaps in understanding lead to a disappointing lack of communication between researchers and
the public concerning fundamental concepts in nanoscale science and engineering. Strategies are offered on how scientists
should present their research when engaging the public on nanotechnology topics.
Since the time of writing, O.M. Castellini has relocated to the Department of Science and Technology, Museum of Science and
Industry, 57th Street and Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. 相似文献
2.
We report data from the first representative national phone survey of Americans' perceptions about nanotechnology (N =1536). Public opinion about nanotechnology is in its infancy, and knowledge about it is quite limited. Yet, Americans' initial reaction to nanotechnology is thus far generally positive, probably rooted in a generally positive view of science overall. Survey respondents expected benefits of nanotechnology to be more prevalent than risks, and they reported feeling hopeful about nanotechnology rather than worried. Their most preferred potential benefit of nanotechnology is new and better ways to detect and treat human diseases, and they identified losing personal privacy to tiny new surveillance devices as the most important potential risk to avoid. The most discouraging aspect to the data is respondents' lack of trust in business leaders to minimize nanotechnology risks to human health. Overall, these data indicate that while Americans do not necessarily presume benefits and the absence of risks, their outlook is much more positive than not. 相似文献
3.
The North American opinion climate for nanotechnology and its products: Opportunities and challenges
Susanna Priest 《Journal of nanoparticle research》2006,8(5):563-568
A January 2005 telephone survey of 1200 people in the U.S. and 2000 Canadians provides a snapshot of current North American opinion regarding nanotechnology at this crucial early point in its emergence from the laboratory to the arena of public discourse and public understanding. Using a typology of “publics” developed through analysis of a previous comparative survey (Priest, S., 2006) and subsequently tested against these newer data (Priest, S., 2005) this article describes the opinion climate for nanotechnology across North America. The comparison of key results from the two countries helps illustrate how social and cultural differences contribute to reactions to new technologies, including nanotech. The article also discusses implications for nanotechnology-related public outreach and risk communication efforts. 相似文献