The hapticity of cyclooctatetraene in its first row mononuclear transition metal carbonyl complexes: Several examples of octahapto coordination

The two cyclooctatetraene metal carbonyls that have been synthesized are the tetrahapto derivative (η⁴-C₈H₈)Fe(CO)₃ and the hexahapto derivative (η⁶-C₈H₈)Cr(CO)₃ using the reactions of cyclooctatetraene with Fe(CO)₅ and with fac-(CH₃CN)₃Cr(CO)₃, respectively. Related C₈H₈M(CO)_n (M = Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni; n = 4, 3, 2, 1) species have now been investigated by density functional theory in order to explore the scope of cyclooctatetraene metal carbonyl chemistry. In this connection, the existence of octahapto (η⁸-C₈H₈)M(CO)_n species is predicted as long as the central metal M does not exceed the 18-electron configuration by receiving eight electrons from the η⁸-C₈H₈ ring. Thus the lowest energy structures (η⁸-C₈H₈)Ti(CO)_n (n = 3, 2, 1), (η⁸-C₈H₈)M(CO)_n (M = V, Cr; n = 2, 1), and (η⁸-C₈H₈)Mn(CO) all have octahapto η⁸-C₈H₈ rings. An exception is (η⁶-C₈H₈)Fe(CO), with a hexahapto η⁶-C₈H₈ ring and thus only a 16-electron configuration for the iron atom. Hexahapto (η⁶-C₈H₈)M(CO)_n structures are predicted for the known (η⁶-C₈H₈)Cr(CO)₃ as well as the unknown (η⁶-C₈H₈)Ti(CO)₄, (η⁶-C₈H₈)V(CO)₃, (η⁶-C₈H₈)Mn(CO)₂, and (η⁶-C₈H₈)Fe(CO)₂ with 18, 18, 17, 17, and 18 electron configurations, respectively, for the central metal atoms. There are two types of tetrahapto C₈H₈M(CO)_n complexes. In the 1,2,3,4-tetrahapto (η⁴-C₈H₈)M(CO)_n complexes two adjacent CC double bonds, forming a 1,3-diene unit similar to butadiene, are bonded to the metal atom. In the 1,2,5,6-tetrahapto (η^2,2-C₈H₈)M(CO)₃ derivatives two non-adjacent CC double bonds of the C₈H₈ ring are bonded to the metal atom. The known (η⁴-C₈H₈)Fe(CO)₃ is a 1,2,3,4-tetrahapto complex. The unknown isomeric 1,2,5,6-tetrahapto complex (η^2,2-C₈H₈)Fe(CO)₃ is predicted to lie ∼15 kcal/mol above (η⁴-C₈H₈)Fe(CO)₃. The related 1,2,5,6-tetrahapto complexes (η^2,2-C₈H₈)Cr(CO)₄, (η^2,2-C₈H₈)Mn(CO)₄, [(η^2,2-C₈H₈)Mn(CO)₃]⁻, (η^2,2-C₈H₈)Co(CO)₂, and (η^2,2-C₈H₈)Ni(CO)₂ are all predicted to be low-energy structures.     

The hapticity of octafluorocyclooctatetraene in its first-row mononuclear transition metal carbonyl complexes: effect of perfluorination

The iron tricarbonyl complex of octafluorocyclooctatetraene was synthesized by Hughes and co-workers and shown by X-ray crystallography to have a trihapto–monohapto structure (η^3,1-C₈F₈)Fe(CO)₃ in contrast to the tetrahapto structure (η⁴-C₈H₈)Fe(CO)₃ formed by the non-fluorinated cyclooctatetraene. This difference has stimulated a comprehensive density functional theoretical study of the octafluorocyclooctatetraene metal carbonyl complexes (C₈F₈)M(CO) _n (n = 4, 3, 2, 1 for M = Ti, V, Cr, Mn, and Fe; n = 3, 2, 1 for M = Co, Ni) for comparison with their hydrogen analogues (C₈H₈)M(CO) _n . In most such systems, the substitution of fluorine for hydrogen leads to relatively small changes in the preferred structures. However, for the iron carbonyl derivatives (C₈X₈)Fe(CO)₃ (X = H, F), the difference observed experimentally has been confirmed by theory with (η^3,1-C₈F₈)Fe(CO)₃ and (η⁴-C₈H₈)Fe(CO)₃ being the lowest energy structures by 4 and 14 kcal/mol, respectively. The ligand exchange reactions C₈H₈ + (C₈F₈)M(CO) _n  → C₈F₈ + (C₈H₈)M(CO) _n are predicted to be exothermic for almost all of the systems considered, with the (η^3,1-C₈X₈)Fe(CO)₃ system being the main exception. This suggests that the C₈F₈ ligand generally bonds more weakly to transition metals than the C₈H₈ ligand in accord with the electron-withdrawing effect of the ligand fluorine atoms.     

Metal–metal bonding in biscycloheptatrienyl dimetal compounds of the second‐row transition metals

Density functional theory has been used to examine the dimetallocene‐like dicycloheptatrienyl dimetal compounds of the second‐row transition metals (C₇H₇)₂M₂ (M = Ru, Tc, Mo, Nb, Zr). The lowest energy (C₇H₇)₂Mo₂ structure is a coaxial structure with terminal η⁷? C₇H₇ rings, whereas the lowest energy (C₇H₇)₂M₂ structures (M = Ru, Tc, Nb, Zr) are perpendicular structures with bridging η⁴,η⁴? C₇H₇ rings except for the perpendicular (η⁴,η³? C₇H₇)₂Ru₂ structure. The metal–metal bond orders in the (C₇H₇)₂M₂ structures (M = Ru, Tc, Mo, Nb), as determined by analysis of their frontier molecular orbitals, suggest preferred 16‐ rather than 18‐electron configurations for the central metal atoms. Thus, in the coaxial (η⁷? C₇H₇)₂M₂ structures the formal bond orders are two for M = Tc and three for M = Mo. For the perpendicular structures both (η⁴,η³? C₇H₇)₂Ru₂ and (η⁴,η⁴? C₇H₇)₂Tc₂ have 16‐electron configurations with metal–metal single bonds owing to the different modes of bonding of the bridging C₇H₇ rings in the two structures. For the (C₇H₇)₂Zr₂ system the perpendicular structure has a formal Zr?Zr double bond and the coaxial structure has a very long (～3.5 Å) Zr? Zr bond indicating only 12‐ to 14‐electron configurations for the zirconium atoms.     

An unexpected cluster opening upon the formation of electronically unsaturated η-(cyclooctenyl)metallacarboranes of rhodium(III) and iridium(III) with sterically reduced [(PhCH2)2C2B9H9] ligand

The room-temperature metallation reactions of the K⁺ salt of the [7,8-(PhCH₂)₂-7,8-nido-C₂B₉H₁₀]⁻ anion (1) with the COD-metal μ-chloride dimers [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)₂Rh₂(μ-Cl)₂] (2) and [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)₂Ir₂(μ-Cl)₂] (3) in benzene/ethanol solution gave formally 16-electron pseudocloso-type complexes with the η³-cyclooctenyl ligand at the metal vertices, [3-{(1-3-η³)-C₈H₁₃}-1,2-(PhCH₂)₂-pseudocloso-3,1,2-MC₂B₉H₉] [4, M = Rh(III); 5, M = Ir(III)]. No evidence supporting the existence of an agostic C-H?M bonding interaction in these compounds was obtained either from the crystallographic or the phase-sensitive 2-D [¹H-¹H] NOESY/EXSY studies of 4. The extraordinary stability of complexes 4 and 5 can therefore be associated with their cage-deformed cluster structures, where electronically-deficient (16-electron) metal centers are believed to be stabilized by additional electron density released from the polyhedral C-C bond cleavage. DFT solid-state calculations performed for closo (18-electron) and pseudocloso (16-electron) Rh(III) complexes, [3-(η⁵-C₅Me₅)-1,2-(PhCH₂)₂-closo-3,1,2-RhC₂B₉H₉] (6, C-C, 1.7397 Å) and [3-{(1-3-η³)-C₈H₁₃}-1,2-(4′-MeC₆H₄)₂-pseudocloso-3,1,2-RhC₂B₉H₉] (9, C?C, 2.420(2) Å), showed that the electron density transfer from the carborane moiety to the rhodium center is marginally greater for complex 9, in accordance with the idea that electronics rather than sterics play a crucial role in the stabilization of 16-electron pseudocloso-metallacarborane species.     

Reactions of the metallocene dichlorides [M(Cp)2Cl2] (M = Zr, Hf) and [Ti(MeCp)2Cl2] with the pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate(−2) ligand: Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization and X-ray structures of the products

The reactivity pattern of the 16-electron species [M(Cp)₂Cl₂] (M = Zr, Hf; Cp⁻ = η⁵-C₅H₅⁻) and [Ti(MeCp)₂Cl₂] (MeCp⁻ = η⁵-C₅H₄CH₃⁻) towards the dipicolinate(−2) (dipic²⁻) ligand under mild (ambient temperature) and convenient (aerobic reactions, aqueous media) conditions have been investigated. The syntheses, molecular structures and spectroscopic (IR, ¹H NMR) characterization are reported for the 18-electron products [Zr(Cp)₂(dipic)] (1), [Hf(Cp)₂(dipic)] (2) and [Ti(MeCp)₂(dipic)] (3). The dipic²⁻ ion behaves as N,O,O′-chelating ligand in the three complexes, while the centroids of the Cp⁻ (1, 2) and MeCp⁻ (3) rings formally occupy the fourth and fifth coordination sites about the central metal. The two identical/very similar bite angles of only ∼70° make the dipic²⁻ ligand particularly suited to form stable metallocene derivatives with 5-coordinate geometry. IR and ¹H NMR data are discussed in terms of the known structures and the tridentate chelating mode of the dipic²⁻ ligand.     

Synthesis of homo- and heterodinuclear metal complexes with dimethylsilylene bridged unsymmetrical bis(cyclopentadienyl) ligand

The reaction of the dilithium salt Li₂[Me₂Si(C₅H₄)(C₅Me₄)] (2) of Me₂Si(C₅H₅)(C₅HMe₄) (1) with [MCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir) and [RhCl(CO)₂]₂ afforded homodinuclear metal complexes [{Me₂Si(η⁵-C₅H₄)(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}{M(C₈H₁₂)}₂] (M=Rh: 3; M=Ir: 4) and [{Me₂Si(η⁵-C₅H₄)(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Rh₂(CO)₂(μ-CO)] (5), respectively. The reaction of 2 with RhCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂ afforded a mononuclear metal complex [{Me₂Si(C₅HMe₄)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}Rh(CO)PPh₃] (6) leaving the C₅HMe₄ moiety intact. Taking advantage of the difference in reactivity of the two cyclopentadienyl moieties of 2, heterodinuclear complexes were prepared in one pot. Thus, the reaction of 2 with RhCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂, followed by the treatment with [MCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir) afforded a homodinuclear metal complex [Rh(CO)PPh₃{(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Rh(C₈H₁₂)] (7) consisting of two rhodium centers with different ligands and a heterodinuclear metal complex [Rh(CO)(PPh₃){(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Ir(C₈H₁₂)] (8). The successive treatment of 2 with [IrCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ and [RhCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ provided heterodinuclear metal complex [Ir(C₈H₁₂){(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Rh(C₈H₁₂)] (9). The reaction of 2 with CoCl(PPh₃)₃ and then with PhCCPh gave a mononuclear cobaltacyclopentadiene complex [{Me₂Si(C₅Me₄H)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}Co(CPhCPhCPhCPh)(PPh₃)] (10). However, successive treatment of 2 with CoCl(PPh₃)₃, PhCCPh and [MCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ in this order afforded heterodinuclear metal complexes [M(C₈H₁₂){(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Co(η⁴-C₄Ph₄)] (M=Rh: 11; M=Ir: 12) in which the cobalt center was connected to the C₅Me₄ moiety. Although the heating of 10 afforded a tetraphenylcyclobutadiene complex [{Me₂Si(C₅Me₄H)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}Co(η⁴-C₄Ph₄)] (13), in which the cobalt center was connected to the C₅H₄ moiety, simple heating of the reaction mixture of 2, CoCl(PPh₃)₃ and PhCCPh resulted in the formation of a tetraphenylcyclobutadiene complex [{Me₂Si(C₅H₅)(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Co(η⁴-C₄Ph₄)] (14), in which the cobalt center was connected to the C₅Me₄ moiety. The mechanism of the cobalt transfer was suggested based on the electrophilicity of the formal trivalent cobaltacyclopentadiene moiety. In the presence of 1,5-cyclooctadiene, the reaction of 2 with CoCl(PPh₃)₃ provided a mononuclear cobalt cyclooctadiene complex [{Me₂Si(C₅Me₄H)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}Co(C₈H₁₂)] (15). The reaction of 15 with n-BuLi followed by the treatment with [MCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir) afforded the heterodinuclear metal complexes of [Co(C₈H₁₂){(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}M(C₈H₁₂)] (M=Rh: 16; M=Ir: 17). Treatment of 6 with Fe₂(CO)₉ at room temperature afforded a heterodinuclear metal complex [{Me₂Si(C₅HMe₄)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}{Rh(PPh₃)(μ-CO)₂Fe(CO)₃}] (18) in which the C₅HMe₄ moiety was kept intact. Treatment of dinuclear metal complex 5 with Fe₂(CO)₉ afforded a heterotrinuclear metal complex [{(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}{Rh(CO)Rh(μ-CO)₂Fe(CO)₃}] (19) having a triangular metal framework. The crystal and molecular structures of 3, 11, 12, 18 and 19 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.     

Niobium organometallic chemistry : I. Reactions of DI-η5 -cyclopentadienyl compounds with sulfur and some sulfur-containing compounds

The 17-electron species (η-C₅H₅)₂ NbMe₂ reacts with cyclooctasulfur and with carbon disulfide to give, the 18-electron species (η-C₅H₅)₂ NbS₂Me (III) and (η-C₅H₅)₂Nb(CS₂)Me (IV), respectively. Addition of methyl iodide to IV gives [(η-C₅H₅)₂Nb{C(S)SMe}MeI]. With sodium diethyldithiocarbamate and M′X (NH₄PF₆, NaBF₄), (η-C₅H₅)₂NbCl₂ yields the compounds [(η-C₅H₅)₂Nb(S₂CNEt₂)]⁺X^?.     

Heteroleptic rhodium complexes containing both the dipyrrin/cyclooctadiene ligands and application of [(η-C8H12)Rh(4-pyrdpm)] in the construction of homo-/hetero-bimetallic complexes

Heteroleptic rhodium(I) complexes with the general formulations [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)Rh(L)] [η⁴-C₈H₁₂ = 1,5-cyclooctadiene; L = 5-(4-cyanophenyl)dipyrromethene, cydpm; 5-(4-nitrophenyl)dipyrromethene, ndpm; and 5-(4-benzyloxyphenyl)dipyrromethene, bdpm; 5-(4-pyridyl)dipyrromethene, 4-pyrdpm; 5-(3-pyridyl)dipyrromethene, 3-pyrdpm] have been synthesized. The complex [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)Rh(4-pyrdpm)] have been used as a synthon in the construction of homo-bimetallic complex [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)Rh(μ-4-pyrdpm)Rh(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Cl₂] and hetero-bimetallic complexes [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)Rh(μ-4-pyrdpm)Ir(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Cl₂], [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)Rh(μ-4-pyrdpm)Ru(η⁶-C₁₀H₁₄)Cl₂] and [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)Rh(μ-4-pyrdpm)Ru(η⁶-C₆H₆)Cl₂]. Resulting complexes have been characterized by elemental analyses and spectral studies. Molecular structures of the representative mononuclear complexes [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)Rh(ndpm)] and [(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)Rh(4-pyrdpm)] have been authenticated crystallographically.     

Bonding analysis and electronic structure of transition metal-benzoquinoline complexes: A theoretical study

The geometric and electronic structures of a series of hypothetical compounds of the types CpM(C₁₃H₉N) and (CO)₃M(C₁₃H₉N) (M = first row transition metal and C₁₃H₉N = 7,8-benzoquinoline) have been investigated by means of density functional theory (DFT). The benzoquinoline ligand can bind to the metal through η¹-η⁶ coordination modes, adopting structures of types a, b and c, in agreement with the electron count and the nature of the metal. In the investigated species, the most favored closed-shell count is 18-MVE, except for the Ti and V models which prefer the open-shell 16-MVE configuration. This study has shown the difference in the coordination ability of this heteropolycyclic ligand and coordination of the inner C₆ ring is less favored than the outer C₆ and C₅N rings, in agreement with the π-electron density localization.     

Study of half-sandwich platinum group metal complexes bearing dpt-NH2 ligand

A quite general approach for the preparation of η⁵-and η⁶-cyclichydrocarbon platinum group metal complexes is reported. The dinuclear arene ruthenium complexes [(η⁶-arene)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ (arene = C₆H₆, C₁₀H₁₄ and C₆Me₆) and η⁵-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl rhodium and iridium complexes [(η⁶-C₅Me₅)M(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ (M = Rh, Ir) react with 2 equiv. of 4-amino-3,5-di-pyridyltriazole (dpt-NH₂) in presence of NH₄PF₆ to afford the corresponding mononuclear complexes of the type [(η⁶-arene)Ru(dpt-NH₂)Cl]PF₆ {arene = C₁₀H₁₄ (1), C₆H₆ (2) and C₆Me₆ (3)} and [(η⁶-C₅Me₅)M(dpt-NH₂)Cl]PF₆ {M = Rh (4), Ir (5)}. However, the mononuclear η⁵-cyclopentadienyl analogues such as [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl], [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Os(PPh₃)₂Br], [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] and [(η⁵-C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] complexes react in presence of 1 equiv. of dpt-NH₂ and 1 equiv. of NH₄PF₆ in methanol yielded mononuclear complexes [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Ru(PPh₃)(dpt-NH₂)]PF₆ (6), [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Os(PPh₃)(dpt-NH₂)]PF₆ (7), [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru(PPh₃)(dpt-NH₂)]PF₆ (8) and [(η⁵-C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)(dpt-NH₂)]PF₆ (9), respectively. These compounds have been totally characterized by IR, NMR and mass spectrometry. The molecular structures of 4 and 6 have been established by single crystal X-ray diffraction and some of the representative complexes have also been studied by UV–Vis spectroscopy.     

Spectral, structural and DFT studies of platinum group metal 3,6-bis(2-pyridyl)-4-phenylpyridazine complexes and their ligand bonding modes

Reactions of 3,6-bis(2-pyridyl)-4-phenylpyridazine (L^ph) with [(η⁶-arene)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ (arene = C₆H₆, p-ⁱPrC₆H₄Me and C₆Me₆), [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)M(μ-Cl)Cl]₂, (M = Rh and Ir) and [(η⁵-Cp)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] (Cp = C₅H₅, C₅Me₅ and C₉H₇) afford mononuclear complexes of the type [(η⁶-arene)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆, [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)M(L^ph)Cl]PF₆ and [(Cp)Ru(L^ph)(PPh₃)]PF₆ with different structural motifs depending on the π-acidity of the ligand, electronic properties of the central metal atom and nature of the co-ligands. Complexes [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆1, [(η⁶-p-ⁱPrC₆H₄Me)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆2, [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ir(L^ph)Cl]PF₆5, [(η⁵-Cp)Ru(PPh₃)(L^ph)]PF₆, (Cp = C₅H₅, 6; C₅Me₅, 7; C₉H₇, 8) show the type-A binding mode (see text), while complexes [(η⁶-C₆Me₆)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆3 and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Rh(L^ph)Cl]PF₆4 show the type-B binding mode (see text). These differences reflect the more electron-rich character of the [(η⁶-C₆Me₆)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Rh(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ complexes compared to the other starting precursor complexes. Binding modes of the ligand L^ph are determined by ¹H NMR spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray analysis as well as evidence obtained from the solid-state structures and corroborated by density functional theory calculations. From the systems studied here, it is concluded that the electron density on the central metal atom of these complexes plays an important role in deciding the ligand binding sites.     

Octahapto cyclooctatetraene rings and metal-metal multiple bonds in binuclear niobium carbonyl chemistry

Theoretical studies on (C₈H₈)₂Nb₂(CO)_n (n = 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1) predict structures mainly with octahapto and tetrahapto C₈H₈ rings. In all cases, the lowest energy singlet spin state structures lie below the corresponding lowest energy triplet spin state structures. Thus the lowest energy (C₈H₈)₂Nb₂(CO)₄ structure has two η⁸-C₈H₈ rings and an unbridged Nb-Nb single bond of length ∼3.15 Å. The lowest energy (C₈H₈)₂Nb₂(CO)₂ structure has two η⁸-C₈H₈ rings but a doubly bridged NbNb triple bond of length ∼2.64 Å. The lowest energy structure of (C₈H₈)₂Nb₂(CO)₃ also has a formal NbNb triple bond of similar length (2.66 Å) but with only one of the rings fully coordinated as an octahapto η⁸-C₈H₈ ligand. The other C₈H₈ ring in this tricarbonyl has “slipped” to form a hexahapto η⁶-C₈H₈ ligand. The lowest energy structure of the monocarbonyl (C₈H₈)₂Nb₂(CO) again has two octahapto η⁸-C₈H₈ rings and an extremely short NbNb distance of 2.45 Å, suggesting a formal quadruple bond. The lowest energy structures for the carbonyl-richer species (C₈H₈)₂Nb₂(CO)_n (n = 6, 5) have one η⁸-C₈H₈ and one η⁴-C₈H₈ ring (n = 5) and two η⁴-C₈H₈ rings (n = 6). The qualitatively assigned Nb-Nb bond orders are consistent with the Wiberg bond indices obtained from the Weinhold natural bond orbital analysis. Comparison of the (C₈H₈)₂Nb₂(CO)_n (n = 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1) derivatives with the isovalent (C₇H₇)₂Mo₂(CO)_n is made.     

A synthetic, structural and reactivity study of [(η-C4R4)Co(η-C5H4X)] complexes, R = Me or Et; X = CHO, CHCHFc, CHCH(η-C5H4)Co(η-C4Ph4), CHC(CN)2: Unexpected formation of [(η-cyclopentadienyl)(η-3,4,5,6-tetraethyl-α-pyrone)cobalt]

The tetraethyl- and tetramethyl-cyclobutadiene complexes [(η⁴-C₄R₄)Co(η⁵-C₅H₄CHO)] R = Et, 5, R = Me, 7, and [(η⁴-C₄R₄)Co(η⁵-C₅H₄CO₂Me)] R = Et, 6, R = Me, 8, are conveniently prepared by photolysis of the corresponding isocobaltocenium cations [(η⁴-C₄R₄)Co(η⁶-C₆H₅Me)]⁺ in acetonitrile, and subsequent treatment with Na[C₅H₄CHO] or Na[C₅H₄CO₂Me]. The aldehydes 5 and 7 undergo Wittig and Knoevenagel reactions with [FcCH₂PPh₃]I and CH₂(CN)₂, to form [(η⁴-C₄R₄)Co(η⁵-C₅H₄CH=CHFc)] and [(η⁴-C₄R₄)Co(η⁵-C₅H₄CH=C(CN)₂], 11 and 15, respectively. The Horner-Wittig reaction of [(η⁴-C₄R₄)Co(η⁵-C₅H₄CH₂P(O)(OEt)₂] with [(η⁴-C₄Ph₄)Co(η⁵-C₅H₄CHO)] yields [(η⁴-C₄R₄)Co(η⁵:η⁵-C₅H₄CHCH-C₅H₄)Co(η⁴-C₄Ph₄)], 12 and 13. [(η⁴-C₄Me₄)Co(η⁵-C₅H₄CHO)] also reacts with t-BuLi and FcLi to furnish the corresponding secondary alcohols, 16 and 17, respectively. Surprisingly, the attempted direct synthesis of 5 by reaction of Na[C₅H₅] and ethyl formate with [(η⁴-C₄Et₄)Co(CO)₂I], 1, instead yielded [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Co(η⁴-3,4,5,6-tetraethyl-α-pyrone)], 18, and a mechanistic proposal is advanced. The X-ray crystal structures of 1, 7, 8, 11(Z), 15 and 18, and also the isocobaltocenium salts [(η⁴-C₄Et₄)Co(η⁶-C₆H₅Me)][PF₆], 2, and [(η⁴-C₄Et₄)Co(η⁶-1,3,5-C₆H₃Me₃)][PF₆], 4, are reported.     

Iron-Gallium and Cobalt-Gallium Tetraphosphido Complexes

The synthesis and characterization of two heterobimetallic complexes [K([18]crown-6){(η⁴-C₁₄H₁₀)Fe(μ-η⁴:η²-P₄)Ga(nacnac)}] ( 1 ) (C₁₄H₁₀ = anthracene) and [K(dme)₂{(η⁴-C₁₄H₁₀)Co(μ-η⁴:η²-P₄)Ga(nacnac)}] ( 2 ) with strongly reduced P₄ units is reported. Compounds 1 and 2 are prepared by reaction of the gallium(III) complex [(nacnac)Ga(η²-P₄)] (nacnac = CH[CMeN(2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃)]₂) with bis(anthracene)ferrate(1–) and -cobaltate(1–) salts. The molecular structures of 1 and 2 were determined by X-ray crystallography and feature a P₄ chain which binds to the transition metal atom via all four P atoms and to the gallium atom via the terminal P atoms. Multinuclear NMR studies on 2 suggest that the molecular structure is preserved in solution.     

(η4-cycloocta-1,5-diene)(η6-cycloocta-1,3,5-triene)ruthenium(0): mechanistic study on carbonylation and synthesis of (η4-cycloheptatriene)tricarbonylruthenium

The carbonylation of Ru(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)(η⁶-C₈H₁₀) (I) (C₈H₁₂ = cycloocta-1,5-diene, C₈H₁₀ = cycloocta-1,3,5-triene) occurs readily at room temperature and one atmosphere pressure of carbon monoxide. The initial product is Ru(CO)-(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)(η⁴-C₈H₁₀) (II); its formation was monitored by IR spectroscopy and shown to be first order with respect to I. Further reaction with CO produces Ru(CO)₃(η⁴-C₈H₁₂). In the presence of C₇H₈ (C₇H₈ = cycloheptatriene) two major products are formed Ru(CO)₃(η⁴-C₇H₈) and Ru(CO)₂(η⁶-C₇H₈).     

Facile synthesis of new polyolefinic ruthenium(0) complexes from ruthenium(II) precursors

The new ruthenium(II) complex [(C₈H₁₀)RuCl₂]_n (1) (C₈H₁₀ = 1,3,5-cyclooctatriene; n ⩾ 2) has been obtained from the reaction of RuCl₃·xH₂O with 1,3,5,7-cyclooctatetraene in refluxing ethanol. Reduction of [(C₈H₁₀)RuCl₂]_n and [(C₇H₈)RuCl₂]₂ (2) (C₇H₈ = 1,3,5-cyclooctatriene) by Na/Hg amalgam in the presence of isoprene (C₅H₈) gives the novel ruthenium(O) complexes [(η⁶-C₈H₁₀)Ru(η⁴-C₅H₈)] (3) and [(η⁶-C₇H₈)Ru(η⁴-C₅H₈)] (4). [(η⁶-C₇H₈Ru(η⁴-C₅H₈)] reacts with CO and HBF₄ to give [(η⁶-C₇H₈)Ru(η³-C₅H₉)(CO)][BF₄] (C₅H₉ = trans-1,2-dimethylallyl (5a); 1,1-dimethylallyl (5b)).     

(Indenyl)iridacarborane (η<Superscript>5</Superscript>-indenyl)Ir(η-7,8-C<Subscript>2</Subscript>B<Subscript>9</Subscript>H<Subscript>11</Subscript>): synthesis,structure, and bonding

A reaction of iodide [(η⁵-indenyl)IrI₂]_n (1) with thallium dicarbollide Tl[Tl(η-7,8-C₂B₉H₁₁)] leads to (indenyl)iridacarborane (η⁵-indenyl)Ir(η-7,8-C₂B₉H₁₁) (2) in 32% yield. The X-ray diffraction study showed that in the structure of 2, the five-membered rings C₅ and C₂B₃ have a cisoid conformation, in which the bridgehead carbon atoms of the indenyl ligand are arranged opposite to the carborane cage carbon atoms. The DFT calculations showed that the Ir—indenyl bond in compound 2 is weaker than the Ir—Cp bond in the complex (η-7,8-C₂B₉H₁₁)IrCp.     

Synthesis and characterization of complexes imparting N-pyridyl bonded meso-pyridyl substituted dipyrromethanes

The meso-pyridyl substituted dipyrromethane ligands 5-(4-pyridyl)dipyrromethane (4-dpmane) and 5-(3-pyridyl)dipyrromethane (3-dpmane) have been employed in the synthesis of a series of complexes with the general formulations [(η⁶-arene)RuCl₂(L)] (η⁶-arene = C₆H₆, C₁₀H₁₄) and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)MCl₂(L)] (M = Rh, Ir). The reaction products have been characterized by microanalyses and spectral studies and molecular structures of the complexes [(η⁶-C₁₀H₁₄)RuCl₂(4-dpmane)] and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)IrCl₂(3-dpmane)] have been determined crystallographically. For comparative studies, geometrical optimization have been performed on the complex [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)IrCl₂(4-dpmane)] using exchange correlation functional B3LYP. Optimized bond length and angles are in good agreement with the structural data of the complex [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)IrCl₂(3-dpmane)]. The complexes [(η⁶-C₁₀H₁₄)RuCl₂(3-dpmane)], [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)RhCl₂(3-dpmane)] and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)IrCl₂(3-dpmane)] have been employed as a transfer hydrogenation catalyst in the reduction of aldehydes. It was observed that the rhodium and iridium complexes mentioned above are more effective in this regard in comparison to the ruthenium complex.     

The structure of silyl cyclopentadienes

Calculations have been made in the MNDO approximation of the structures and energies of three isomeric forms of (η¹-C₅H₅)SiR₃ (R = H, Me) and of (η⁵-C₅H₅)SiR₃, together with potential energy curves for the folding of the C₅ ring in 5-R₃SiC₅H₅; all the η¹ species have planar C₅rings at equilibrium. In addition (1,2) and (1,3) shift mechanisms have been investigated for migration of both SiH₃ and hydrogen in (η¹-C₅H₅)SiH₃: the lowest energy pathway in each case is the (1,2) shift mechanism; structures and energies of the transition states are reported.     

Synthesis and structure of mono- and dinuclear cyclopentadienyl–indenyl complexes of iron(II) and further reactions to mixed tri- and tetranuclear iron–cobalt complexes

The reaction of a mixture of sodium cyclopentadienide and the monolithium salt or dilithium salt of 2,2-bis(indenyl)propane with FeCl₂ leads to the mononuclear complex [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(η⁵-ind-C(CH₃)₂-ind)] (ind = 1-indenyl) (1) and the dinuclear complex [{(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(η⁵-ind)}₂C(CH₃)₂] (2), respectively. [(η⁵-Me₅C₅)Fe(tmeda)Cl] reacts with dilithium 1,1′-biindenyl under formation of [{(η⁵-Me₅C₅)Fe}₂(μ-η⁵:η⁵-1,1′-biind)] (4). Due to the annelated arene rings of the η⁵-indenyl ligands, 2 and 4 may act as 4-electron donor ligands, as exemplified by the reaction with the triple-decker complex [{(η⁵-Me₅C₅)Co}₂(μ-η⁶:η⁶-toluene)], which afforded the tetranuclear dimer of triple-decker complexes [{(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(η⁵-Me₅C₅)Co(μ-η⁵:η⁴-1-ind)}₂C(CH₃)₂] (3) and the trinuclear complex [{(η⁵-Me₅C₅)Fe}₂(η⁵-Me₅C₅)Co(μ₃-η⁵:η⁴:η⁵-1,1′-biind)] · Et₂O (5 · Et₂O) by replacement of the central toluene deck, respectively. The [(η⁵-Me₅C₅)Co] fragments of 3 and 5 are bonded via the six-membered rings of the indenyl ligands in a η⁴-fashion. Caused by the coordination to the Co atoms the six-membered rings lose their planarity and adopt a butterfly structure. The coordination geometry of the Fe atoms is similar in all five complexes. Each Fe atom is coordinated by the C atoms of one of the five-membered rings of the indenyl ligands in a slightly distorted η⁵ manner (η³ + η²-coordination) and by a cyclopentadienyl ligand in a regular η⁵-fashion. The structures of 3 and 5 represent the first examples of slipped triple-decker complexes which comprise indenyl ligands in a μ-η⁵:η⁴ coordination mode.