Synthesis of a new monomer N′‐(β‐methacryloyloxyethyl)‐2‐pyrimidyl‐(p‐benzyloxycarbonyl)aminobenzenesulfonamide and its copolymerization with N‐phenyl maleimide

The new monomer N′‐(β‐methacryloyloxyethyl)‐2‐pyrimidyl‐(p‐benzyloxy‐ carbonyl)aminobenzenesulfonamide (MPBAS) (M₁) is synthesized using sulfadiazine as parent compound. It could be homopolymerized and copolymerized with N‐phenyl maleimide (NPMI) (M₂) by radical mechanism using AIBN as initiator at 60 °C in dimethylformamide. The new monomer MPBAS and polymers were identified by IR, element analysis and ¹H NMR in detail. The monomer reactivity ratios in copolymerization were determined by YBR method, and r₁ (MPBAS) = 2.39 ± 0.05, r₂ (NPMI) = 0.33 ± 0.02. In the presence of ammonium formate, benzyloxycarbonyl groups could be broken fluently from MPBAS segments of copolymer by catalytic transfer hydrogenation, and the copolymer with sulfadiazine side groups are recovered. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 2548–2554, 2000     

Synthesis and polymerization of 5‐(methacrylamido)tetrazole,a water‐soluble acidic monomer

The reaction of methacryloyl chloride with 5‐aminotetrazole gave the polymerizable methacrylamide derivative 5‐(methacrylamido)tetrazole ( 4 ) in one step. The monomer had an acidic tetrazole group with a pK_a value of 4.50 ± 0.01 in water methanol (2:1). Radical polymerization proceeded smoothly in dimethyl formamide or, after the conversion of monomer 4 into sodium salt 4‐Na , even in water. A superabsorbent polymer gel was obtained by the copolymerization of 4‐Na and 0.08 mol % N,N′‐methylenebisacrylamide. Its water absorbency was about 200 g of water/g of polymer, although the extractable sol content of the gel turned out to be high. The consumption of 4‐Na and acrylamide (as a model compound for the crosslinker) during a radical polymerization at 57 °C in D₂O was followed by ¹H NMR spectroscopy. Fitting the changes in the monomer concentration to the integrated form of the copolymerization equation gave the reactivity ratios r _4‐Na = 1.10 ± 0.05 and r_acrylamide = 0.45 ± 0.02, which did not differ much from those of an ideal copolymerization. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 4333–4343, 2002     

Monomer reactivity ratios for acrylonitrile–methyl acrylate free‐radical copolymerization

Nonlinear monomer reactivity ratios for the homogeneous free‐radical copolymerization of acrylonitrile and methyl acrylate were determined from ¹H NMR and real‐time Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analyses. All ¹H NMR data were obtained on polymers isolated at low conversions (<10%), whereas the FTIR data were collected in situ. The copolymerizations were conducted in N,N‐dimethylformamide at 62 °C and were initiated with azobisisobutyronitrile. The real‐time FTIR technique allowed for many data points to be collected for each feed composition, which enabled the calculation of copolymer compositions (dM₁/dM₂) with better accuracy. Monomer reactivity ratios were estimated with the Mayo–Lewis method and then were refined via a nonlinear least‐squares analysis first suggested by Mortimer and Tidwell. Thus, monomer reactivity ratios at the 95% confidence level were determined to be 1.29 ± 0.2 and 0.96 ± 0.2 for acrylonitrile and methyl acrylate, respectively, which were valid under the specific system conditions (i.e., solvent and temperature) studied. The results are useful for the development of acrylonitrile (<90%) and methyl acrylate, melt‐processable copolymer fibers and films, including precursors for carbon fibers. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 2994–3001, 2004     

Spontaneous alternating copolymerization of N-phenylmaleimide with ethyl α-phenylacrylate

The spontaneous copolymerization of N-phenylmaleimide (NPMI) (M₁) with ethyl α-phenylacrylate (EPA)(M₂) were carried out in dioxane at 85°C. A high alternating tendency was observed. The monomer reactivity ratios were r₁ = 0.07 ±0.01 and r₂ = 0.09 ± 0.02. The maximum copolymerization rate and molecular weight occurs at 70–80 mol% (M₁) in feed ratio. The spontaneous alternating copolymerization is considered to be carried out via a contact-type charge transfer complex (CTC) formed between the monomers. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) indicate the resulting copolymers have high thermal stability. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 36: 2927–2931, 1998     

Synthesis and characterization of cationic copolymers of butylacrylate and [3‐(methacryloylamino)‐propyl]trimethylammonium chloride

Cationic copolymers of butylacrylate (BA) and [3‐(methacryloylamino)‐propyl]trimethylammonium chloride (MAPTAC) were synthesized by free‐radical‐solution polymerization in methanol and ethanol. An FT‐Raman Spectrometer and NMR were used to monitor the polymerization process. The copolymers were characterized by light scattering, NMR, DSC, and thermogravimetric analysis. It was found that random copolymers could be prepared, and the molar fractions of BA and cationic monomers in the copolymers were close to the feed ratios. The copolymer prepared in methanol had a higher molecular weight than that prepared in ethanol. As the cationic monomer content increased, the glass‐transition temperature (T_g) of the copolymer also increased, whereas the thermal stability decreased. The reactivity ratios for the monomers were evaluated. The copolymerization of BA (M₁) with MAPTAC (M₂) gave reactivity ratios such as r₁ = 0.92 and r₂ = 2.61 in ethanol as well as r₁ = 0.79 and r₂ = 0.90 in methanol. This study indicated that a random copolymer containing a hydrophobic monomer (BA) and a cationic hydrophilic monomer (MAPTAC) could be prepared in a proper polar solvent such as methanol or ethanol. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 39: 1031–1039, 2001     

Atom transfer radical copolymerization of styrene and N‐cyclohexylmaleimide

Atom transfer radical copolymerization of Styrene (St) and N‐cyclohexylmaleimide (NCMI) with the CuBr/bipyridine catalyst in anisole, initiated by 1‐phenylethyl bromide (1‐PEBr) or tetra‐(bromomethyl)benzene (TBMB), afforded well‐defined copolymers with predetermined molecular weights and low polydispersities, M_w/M_n < 1.5. The influences of several factors, such as temperature, solvent, and monomer ratio, on the copolymerization with the CuBr/bpy catalyst system were subsequently investigated. The apparent enthalpy of activation for the overall copolymerization was measured to be 28.2 kJ/mol. The monomer reactivity ratios were evaluated to be r_NCMI = 0.046 and r_St = 0.127. Using TBMB as the initiator produced four‐armed star copolymer. The copolymerization of styrene and NCMI with TBMB/CuBr/bpy in PhOCH₃ at 110 °C was found to provide good control of molecular weights and polydispersities and the similar copolymerization in cyclohexanone displayed poor control. The glass transition temperature of the resultant copolymer increases with increasing f_NCMI, which indicates that the heat resistance of the copolymer has been improved by increasing NCMI. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 1203–1209, 2000     

Synthesis and polymerization of fluorinated monomers bearing a reactive lateral group. XII. Copolymerization of vinylidene fluoride with 2,3,3‐trifluoroprop‐2‐enol

An improved synthesis of 2,3,3‐trifluoroprop‐2‐enol (FA1) and its copolymerization in solution with vinylidene fluoride (VDF, or 1,1‐difluoroethylene) initiated by tert‐butyl peroxypivalate are presented. A new synthesis of FA1, with NaH and lithium diisopropylamine as bases, from 2,2,3,3‐tetrafluoropropanol is described. A series of nine copolymerization reactions were investigated from initial [VDF]₀/[FA1]₀ molar ratios of 9.1/90.9 to 94.2/5.8. The copolymer compositions were calculated via ¹⁹F NMR spectroscopy. From the Tidwell–Mortimer method, the reactivity ratios of both comonomers were determined (r_FA1 = 0.11 ± 0.22 and r_VDF = 0.83 ± 0.77 at 50°C), and they showed an azeotropic point. Alfrey and Price's Q and e values of FA1 were calculated to be 0.0178 (from Q_VDF = 0.008), 0.039 (from Q_VDF = 0.015), and 0.275 (from Q_VDF = 0.036) and 2.74 (vs e_VDF = 1.20), 2.04 (vs e_VDF = 0.50), and 1.94 (vs e_VDF = 0.4), respectively, and they indicated that FA1 is an electron‐accepting monomer. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 3634–3643, 2002     

Synthesis and copolymerization of fluorinated monomers bearing a reactive lateral group. XX. Copolymerization of vinylidene fluoride with 4‐bromo‐1,1,2‐trifluorobut‐1‐ene

The radical copolymerization of vinylidene fluoride (VDF) with 4‐bromo‐1,1,2‐trifluorobut‐1‐ene (C₄Br) was examined. This bromofluorinated alkene was synthesized in three steps, which started with the addition of bromine to chlorotrifluoroethylene. In contrast to the ethylenation of 1,1‐difluoro‐1,2‐dibromochlorethane, which failed, that of 2‐chloro‐1,1,2‐trifluoro‐1,2‐dibromoethane was optimized and led to 2‐chloro‐1,1,2‐trifluoro‐1,4‐dibromobutane. The kinetics of the copolymerization of VDF with this brominated monomer initiated by t‐butyl peroxypivalate led to an assessment of the reactivity ratios, r_VDF = 0.96 ± 0.67 and r_C4Br = 0.09 ± 0.63, at 50 °C. The suspension copolymerization was also carried out, and the chemical modifications of the resulting bromo‐containing poly(vinylidene fluoride)s were attempted and consisted mainly of elimination or nucleophilic substitution of the bromine. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 917–935, 2005     

Determination of the reactivity ratios of methyl acrylate with the vinyl acetate,vinyl 2,2-dimethyl-propanoate,and vinyl 2-ethylhexanoate

The course of composition drift in copolymerization reactions is determined by reactivity ratios of the contributing monomers. Since polymer properties are directly correlated with the resulting chemical composition distribution, reactivity ratios are of paramount importance. Furthermore, obtaining correct reactivity ratios is a prerequisite for good model predictions. For vinyl acetate (VAc), vinyl 2,2-dimethyl-propanoate also known as vinyl pivalate (VPV), and vinyl 2-ethylhexanoate (V2EH), the reactivity ratios with methyl acrylate (MA) have been determined by means of low conversion bulk polymerization. The mol fraction of MA in the resulting copolymer was determined by ¹H-NMR. Nonlinear optimization on the thus-obtained monomer feed–copolymer composition data resulted in the following sets of reactivity ratios: r_MA = 6.9 ± 1.4 and r_VAc = 0.013 ± 0.02; r_MA = 5.5 ± 1.2 and r_VPV = 0.017 ± 0.035; r_MA = 6.9 ± 2.7 and r_V2EH = 0.093 ± 0.23. As a result of the similar and overlapping reactivity data of the three methyl acrylate–vinyl ester monomer systems, for practical puposes these data can be described with one set of reactivity data. Nonlinear optimization of all monomer feed–copolymer composition data together resulted in r_MA = 6.1 ± 0.6 and r_VEst = 0.0087 ± 0.023. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Anionic copolymerization of optically active α-methylbenzyl methacrylate and trityl methacrylate. I. Reactivity of monomers

The monomer reactivity ratios were determined in the anionic copolymerization of (S)- or (RS)-α-methylbenzyl methacrylate (MBMA) and trityl methacrylate (TrMA) with butyllithium at ?78°C, and the stereoregularity of the yielded copolymer was investigated. In the copolymerization of (S)-MBMA (M₁) and TrMA (M₂) in toluene the monomer reactivity ratios were r₁ = 8.55 and r₂ = 0.005. On the other hand, those in the copolymerization of (RS)-MBMA with TrMA were r₁ = 4.30 and r₂ = 0.03. The copolymer of (S)-MBMA and TrMA prepared in toluene was a mixture of two types of copolymer: one consisted mainly of the (S)-MBMA unit and was highly isotactic and the other contained both monomers copiously. The same monomer reactivity ratios, r₁ = 0.39 and r₂ = 0.33, were obtained in the copolymerizations of the (S)-MBMA–TrMA and (RS)-MBMA–TrMA systems in tetrahydrofuran (THF). The microstructures of poly[(S)-MBMA-co-TrMA] and poly-[(RS)-MBMA-co-TrMA] produced in THF were similar where the isotacticity increased with an increase in the content of the TrMA unit.     

Copolymerization of 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate

Copolymers of 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate, (SEM) were prepared with ethyl methacrylate, ethyl acrylate, vinylidene chloride, and styrene in 1,2-dimethoxyethane solution with N,N′-azobisisobutyronitrile as initiator. The monomer reactivity ratios with SEM (M₁) were: vinylidene chloride, r₁ = 3.6 ± 0.5, r₂ = 0.22 ± 0.03; ethyl acrylate, r₁ = 3.2 ± 0.6, r₂ = 0.30 ± 0.05; ethyl methacrylate, r₁ = 2.0 ± 0.4, r₂ = 1.0 ± 0.1; styrene, r₁ = 0.6 ± 0.2, r₂ = 0.37 ± 0.03. The values of the copolymerization parameters calculated from the monomer reactivity ratios were e = +0.6 and Q = 1.4. Comparison of the monomer reactivities indicates that SEM is similar to ethyl methacrylate with regard to copolymerization reactivity in 1,2-dimethoxyethane solution. The sodium salt of 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate, SEM^?Na^⊕, was copolymerized with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (M₂) in water solution. Reactivity ratios of r₁ = 0.7 ± 0.1 and r₂ = 1.6 ± 0.1 were obtained, indicating a lower reactivity of SEM^?Na^⊕ in water as compared to SEM in 1,2-dimethoxyethane. This decreased reactivity was attributed to greater ionic repulsion between reacting species in the aqueous medium.     

Nitroxide‐mediated free‐radical copolymerization of styrene with butyl acrylate

Controlled free‐radical copolymerization of styrene (S) and butyl acrylate (BA) was achieved by using a second‐generation nitroxide, N‐tert‐butyl‐N‐[1‐diethylphosphono‐(2,2‐dimethylpropyl)] nitroxide (DEPN), and 2,2‐azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) at 120 °C. The time‐conversion first‐order plot was linear, and the number‐average molecular weight increased in direct proportion to the ratio of monomer conversion to the initial concentration, providing copolymers with low polydispersity. The monomer reactivity ratios obtained were r_S = 0.74 and r_BA = 0.29, respectively. To analyze the convenience of applying the Mayo–Lewis terminal model, the cumulative copolymer composition against conversion and the individual conversion of each monomer as a function of copolymerization time were studied. The theoretical values of the propagating radical concentration ratio were also examined to investigate the copolymerization rate behavior. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 4168–4176, 2004     

Copolymerization of 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione with p-chlorostyrene and vinylidene chloride

The copolymerization of 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione (M₂) with p-chlorostyrene and vinylidene chloride is reported. The copolymers were prepared in sealed tubes under nitrogen with azobisisobutyronitrile initiator. Infrared absorption bands at 1580 cm.^?1 revealed the presence of a highly enolic β-diketone and indicated that copolymerization had occurred. The copolymer compositions were determined from the chlorine analyses and the reactivity ratios were evaluated. The copolymerization with p-chlorostyrene (M₁) was highly alternating and provided the reactivity ratios r₁ = 0.32 ± 0.06, r₂ = 0.02 ± 0.01. Copolymerization with vinylidene chloride (M₁) afforded the reactivity ratios r₁ = 2.4 ± 0.6, r₂ = 0.15 ± 0.05. The Q and e values for the dione (Q = 0.13, e = 1.37), as evaluated from the results of the vinylidene chloride case, agree closely with the previously reported results of copolymerization with methyl methacrylate and acrylonitrile and confirm the general low reactivity of 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione in nonalternating systems.     

Polymerization of β-cyanopropionaldehyde. X. Anionic copolymerization with methyl isocyanate

Anionic copolymerization of β-cyanopropionaldehyde (M₁) with methyl isocyanate (MeI, M₂) was studied with use of benzophenone–dilithium complex as initiator at ?78°C. The values of monomer reactivity ratio were determined to be r₁ = 8.3 ± 0.3 and r₂ = 0.01 ± 0.01. The structure of resulting copolymer was investigated by means of NMR analysis. The MeI unit is presumed to enter the copolymer chain through its C?N opening.     

Copolymerization of 2-Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate with Alkyl Met hacrylates

2-Hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2-HPMA) has been copolym-erized with ethyl methacrylate (EMA), n-butyl methacrylate (BMA), and 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate (EHMA) in bulk at 60°C using benzoyl peroxide as initiator. The copolymer composition has been determined from the hydroxyl content. The reactivity ratios have been calculated by the Yezrielev, Brokhina, and Raskin method. For copolymerization of 2-HPMA (M₁) with EMA (M₂), the reactivity ratios are r₁ = 1.807 ± 0.032 and r₂ = 0.245 ± 0.021; with BMA (M₂) they are n = 2.378 ± 0.001 and r₂ = 0.19 ± 0.01; and with EHMA the values are r₁ = 4.370 ± 0.048 and r₂ = 0.103 ± 0.006. Since reactivity ratios are the measure of distribution of monomer units in copolymer chain, the values obtained are compared and discussed. This enables us to choose a suitable copolymer for synthesizing thermoset acrylic polymers, which are obtained from cross-linking of hydroxy functional groups of HPMA units, for specific end-uses.     

Copolymerization of 2-Hydtoxypropyl Methacrylate with Alkyl Methacrylates

2-Hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2 HPMA) has been copolym-erized with ethyl methacrylate (EMA), n-butyl methacrylate (BMA), and 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate (EHMA) in bulk at 60°C using benzoyl peroxide as initiator. The copolymer composition has been determined from the hydroxyl content. The reactivity ratios have been calculated by the YBR method. For copolymerization of 2-HPMA (M₁) with EMA (M₂), the reactivity ratios are: r₁=1.807 ± 0.032, r₂=0.245 ± 0.021; with BMA (M₂) they are r₁=2.378 ± 0.001, r₂=0.19 ± 0.01; and with EHMA the values are r₁=4.370 ± 0.048, r₂=0.103 ± 0.006. Since the reactivity ratios are the measure of distribution of monomer units in a copolymer chain, the values obtained are compared and discussed. This enables us to choose a suitable copolymer for synthesizing thermoset acrylic polymers, which are obtained from cross-linking of hydroxy functional groups of HPMA units, for specific end uses.     

Novel Copolymers of N‐(4‐Bromophenyl)‐2‐Methacrylamide with 2‐Acrylamido‐2‐Methyl‐1‐Propanesulfonic Acid

The new acrylamide monomer, N‐(4‐Bromophenyl)‐2‐methacrylamide (BrPMAAm) has been synthesized by reacting 4‐Bromoaniline with methacryloyl chloride in the presence of triethylamine(NR₃) at 0–5°C. The radical‐initiated copolymerization of (BrPMAAm), with 2‐acrylamido‐2‐methyl‐1‐propanesulfonic acid (AMPS) has been carried out in dimethylformamide (DMF) solution at 70±1°C using 2,2′‐azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) as an initiator with different monomer‐to‐monomer ratios in the feed. The copolymers were characterized by FTIR, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy. The copolymer composition was evaluated by nitrogen content (N for AMPS‐units) in polymers led to the determination of reactivity ratios. The monomer reactivity ratios for BrPMAAm (M₁)‐AMPS (M₂) pair were computed using the Fineman‐Ross (F‐R), Kelen‐Tüdös (KT) and Extended Kelen‐Tüdös (EKT) methods. These parameters were also estimated using a non‐linear computational fitting procedure, known as reactivity ratios error in variable model (RREVM). The mean sequence lengths determination indicated that the copolymer was statistically in nature. By TGA and DSC analyses, the thermal properties of the polymers have been studied. The antimicrobial effects of polymers were also tested on various bacteria, and yeast.     

Synthesis of styrene/methyl methacrylate copolymers by atom transfer radical polymerization: 2D NMR investigations

Copolymers of styrene and methyl methacrylate were synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization using methyl 2‐bromopropionate as initiator and CuBr/N,N,N′,N′,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine as catalyst. Molecular weight distributions were determined by gel permeation chromatography. The composition of the copolymer was determined by ¹H NMR. The comonomer reactivity ratios, determined by both Kelen–Tudos and nonlinear error‐in‐variables methods, were r_S = 0.64 ± 0.08, r_M = 0.63 ± 0.08 and r_S = 0.66, r_M = 0.65, respectively. The α‐methyl and carbonyl carbon resonances were found to be compositionally and configurationally sensitive. Complete spectral assignments of the ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra of the copolymers were done by distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer and two‐dimensional NMR techniques such as heteronuclear single quantum coherence and heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 2076–2085, 2006     

Polar,functionalized diene‐based materials. V. Free‐radical polymerization of 2‐[(N‐benzyl‐n‐methylamino)methyl]‐1,3‐butadiene and copolymerization with styrene

2‐[(N‐Benzyl‐N‐methylamino)methyl]‐1,3‐butadiene (BMAMBD), the first asymmetric tertiary amino‐containing diene‐based monomer, was synthesized by sulfone chemistry and a nickel‐catalyzed Grignard coupling reaction in high purity and good yield. The bulk and solution free‐radical polymerizations of this monomer were studied. Traditional bulk free‐radical polymerization kinetics were observed, giving polymers with 〈M_n〉 values of 21 × 10³ to 48 × 10³ g/mol (where M_n is the number‐average molecular weight) and polydispersity indices near 1.5. In solution polymerization, polymers with higher molecular weights were obtained in cyclohexane than in tetrahydrofuran (THF) because of the higher chain transfer to the solvent. The chain‐transfer constants calculated for cyclohexane and THF were 1.97 × 10^?3 and 5.77 × 10^?3, respectively. To further tailor polymer properties, we also completed copolymerization studies with styrene. Kinetic studies showed that BMAMBD incorporated into the polymer chain at a faster rate than styrene. With the Mayo–Lewis equation, the monomer reactivity ratios of BMAMBD and styrene at 75 °C were determined to be 2.6 ± 0.3 and 0.28 ± 0.02, respectively. Altering the composition of BMAMBD in the copolymer from 17 to 93% caused the glass‐transition temperature of the resulting copolymer to decrease from 64 to ?7 °C. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 39: 3227–3238, 2001     

Radical copolymerization of vinylidene fluoride with 1‐bromo‐2,2‐difluoroethylene

The radical copolymerization of vinylidene fluoride (VDF) and 1‐bromo‐2,2‐difluoroethylene (BDFE) in 1,1,1,3,3‐pentafluorobutane solution at different monomer molar ratios (ranging from 96/4 to 25/75 mol %) and initiated by tert‐butylperoxypivalate (TBPPI, mainly) is presented. Poly(VDF‐co‐BDFE) copolymers of various aspects (from white powders to yellow viscous liquids) were produced depending on the copolymer compositions. The microstructures of the obtained copolymers were characterized by ¹⁹F and ¹H NMR spectroscopy and by elementary analysis and these techniques enabled one to assess the contents of both comonomers in the produced copolymers. VDF was shown to be more incorporated in the copolymer than BDFE. From the extended Kelen and Tudos method, the kinetics of the radical copolymerization led to the determination of the reactivity ratios, r_i, of both comonomers (r_VDF = 1.20 ± 0.50 and r_{BDFE =} 0.40 ± 0.15 at 75 °C) showing that VDF is more reactive than BDFE. Alfrey‐Price's Q and e values of BDFE monomer were calculated to be 0.009 (from Q_VDF = 0.008) or 0.019 (from Q_VDF = 0.015) and +1.22 (vs. e_VDF = 0.40) or +1.37 (vs. e_VDF = 0.50), respectively, indicating that BDFE is an electron‐accepting monomer. Statistic cooligomers were produced with molar masses ranging from 1,800 to 5,500 g/mol (assessed by GPC with polystyrene standards). A further evidence of the successful copolymerization was shown by the selective reduction of bromine atoms in poly(VDF‐co‐BDFE) cooligomers that led to analog PVDF. The thermal properties of the poly(VDF‐co‐BDFE) cooligomers were also determined and those containing a high VDF amount exhibited a high thermal stability. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 3964–3976, 2010.