Two machine preemptive scheduling problem with release dates,equal processing times and precedence constraints

We consider a scheduling problem with two identical parallel machines and n jobs. For each job we are given its release date when job becomes available for processing. All jobs have equal processing times. Preemptions are allowed. There are precedence constraints between jobs which are given by a (di)graph consisting of a set of outtrees and a number of isolated vertices. The objective is to find a schedule minimizing mean flow time. We suggest an O(n²) algorithm to solve this problem.The suggested algorithm also can be used to solve the related two-machine open shop problem with integer release dates, unit processing times and analogous precedence constraints.     

Approximating total weighted completion time on identical parallel machines with precedence constraints and release dates

We present a $(2+2ln2+\epsilon )$-approximation algorithm for the classical nonpreemptive scheduling problem to minimize the total weighted completion time of jobs on identical parallel machines subject to release dates and precedence constraints, improving upon the previously best known 4-approximation algorithm from 1998. The result carries over to the more general problem with precedence delays and generalizes a recent result by Li (2017) for the problem without release dates or delays.     

Maximization Problems in Single Machine Scheduling

Problems of scheduling n jobs on a single machine to maximize regular objective functions are studied. Precedence constraints may be given on the set of jobs and the jobs may have different release times. Schedules of interest are only those for which the jobs cannot be shifted to start earlier without changing job sequence or violating release times or precedence constraints. Solutions to the maximization problems provide an information about how poorly such schedules can perform. The most general problem of maximizing maximum cost is shown to be reducible to n similar problems of scheduling n?1 jobs available at the same time. It is solved in O(mn+n ²) time, where m is the number of arcs in the precedence graph. When all release times are equal to zero, the problem of maximizing the total weighted completion time or the weighted number of late jobs is equivalent to its minimization counterpart with precedence constraints reversed with respect to the original ones. If there are no precedence constraints, the problem of maximizing arbitrary regular function reduces to n similar problems of scheduling n?1 jobs available at the same time.     

Scheduling linearly shortening jobs under precedence constraints

We consider the problem of scheduling a set of dependent jobs on a single machine with the maximum completion time criterion. The processing time of each job is variable and decreases linearly with respect to the starting time of the job. Applying a uniform approach based on the calculation of ratios of expressions that describe total processing times of chains of jobs, we show basic properties of the problem. On the basis of these properties, we prove that if precedence constraints among jobs are in the form of a set of chains, a tree, a forest or a series–parallel digraph, the problem can be solved in O(n log n) time, where n denotes the number of the jobs.     

On the single machine serial batching scheduling problem to minimize total completion time with precedence constraints, release dates and identical processing times

We consider the single machine, serial batching, total completion time scheduling problem with precedence constraints, release dates and identical processing times in this paper. The complexity of this problem is reported as open in the literature. We provide an O(n⁵) time algorithm to solve this problem.     

Parallel-machine scheduling with release dates and rejection

In this paper, we consider the parallel-machine scheduling problem with release dates and rejection. A job is either rejected, in which case a rejection penalty has to be paid, or accepted and processed on one of the m identical parallel machines. The objective is to minimize the sum of the makespan of the accepted jobs and the total rejection penalty of the rejected jobs. When m is a fixed constant, we provide a pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm and a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme for the problem. When m is arbitrary, we present a 2-approximation algorithm for the problem.     

Batch delivery scheduling with batch delivery cost on a single machine

We consider a scheduling problem in which n independent and simultaneously available jobs are to be processed on a single machine. The jobs are delivered in batches and the delivery date of a batch equals the completion time of the last job in the batch. The delivery cost depends on the number of deliveries. The objective is to minimize the sum of the total weighted flow time and delivery cost. We first show that the problem is strongly NP-hard. Then we show that, if the number of batches is B, the problem remains strongly NP-hard when B ? U for a variable U ? 2 or B ? U for any constant U ? 2. For the case of B ? U, we present a dynamic programming algorithm that runs in pseudo-polynomial time for any constant U ? 2. Furthermore, optimal algorithms are provided for two special cases: (i) jobs have a linear precedence constraint, and (ii) jobs satisfy the agreeable ratio assumption, which is valid, for example, when all the weights or all the processing times are equal.     

A bicriteria flowshop scheduling with a learning effect

In many situations, a worker’s ability improves as a result of repeating the same or similar tasks; this phenomenon is known as the learning effect. In this paper the learning effect is considered in a two-machine flowshop. The objective is to find a sequence that minimizes a weighted sum of total completion time and makespan. Total completion time and makespan are widely used performance measures in scheduling literature. To solve this scheduling problem, an integer programming model with n² + 6n variables and 7n constraints where n is the number of jobs is formulated. Because of the lengthy computing time and high computing complexity of the integer programming model, the problem with up to 30 jobs can be solved. A heuristic algorithm and a tabu search based heuristic algorithm are presented to solve large size problems. Experimental results show that the proposed heuristic methods can solve this problem with up to 300 jobs rapidly. According to the best of our knowledge, no work exists on the bicriteria flowshop with a learning effect.     

The two-machine no-wait general and proportionate open shop makespan problem

We consider the two-machine no-wait open shop minimum makespan problem in which the determination of an optimal solution requires an optimal pairing of the jobs followed by the optimal sequencing of the job pairs. We show that the required enumeration can be curtailed by reducing the pair sequencing problem for a given pair set to a traveling salesman problem which is equivalent to a two-machine no-wait flow shop problem solvable in O(n log n) time. We then propose an optimal O(n log n) algorithm for the proportionate problem with equal machine speeds in which each job has the same processing time on both machines. We show that our O(n log n) algorithm also applies to the more general proportionate problem with equal machine speeds and machine-specific setup times. We also analyze the proportionate problem with unequal machine speeds and conclude that the required enumeration can be further curtailed (compared to the problem with arbitrary job processing times) by eliminating certain job pairs from consideration.     

Parallel machine scheduling with a convex resource consumption function

We consider some problems of scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines where job-processing times are controllable through the allocation of a nonrenewable common limited resource. The objective is to assign the jobs to the machines, to sequence the jobs on each machine and to allocate the resource so that the makespan or the sum of completion times is minimized. The optimization is done for both preemptive and nonpreemptive jobs. For the makespan problem with nonpreemptive jobs we apply the equivalent load method in order to allocate the resources, and thereby reduce the problem to a combinatorial one. The reduced problem is shown to be NP-hard. If preemptive jobs are allowed, the makespan problem is shown to be solvable in O(n²) time. Some special cases of this problem with precedence constraints are presented and the problem of minimizing the sum of completion times is shown to be solvable in O(n log n) time.     

Single machine scheduling with release dates and rejection

In this paper, we consider the single machine scheduling problem with release dates and rejection. A job is either rejected, in which case a rejection penalty has to be paid, or accepted and processed on the machine. The objective is to minimize the sum of the makespan of the accepted jobs and the total rejection penalty of the rejected jobs. We show that the problem is NP-hard in the ordinary sense. Then we provide two pseudo-polynomial-time algorithms. Consequently, two special cases can be solved in polynomial-time. Finally, a 2-approximation algorithm and a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme are given for the problem.     

On-line scheduling on a batch processing machine with unbounded batch size to minimize the makespan

We present on-line algorithms to minimize the makespan on a single batch processing machine. We consider a parallel batching machine that can process up to b jobs simultaneously. Jobs in the same batch complete at the same time. Such a model of a batch processing machine has been motivated by burn-in ovens in final testing stage of semiconductor manufacturing. We deal with the on-line scheduling problem when jobs arrive over time. We consider a set of independent jobs. Their number is not known in advance. Each job is available at its release date and its processing requirement is not known in advance. This general problem with infinite machine capacity is noted 1∣p − batch, r_j, b = ∞∣C_max. Deterministic algorithms that do not insert idle-times in the schedule cannot be better than 2-competitive and a simple rule based on LPT achieved this bound [Z. Liu, W. Yu, Scheduling one batch processor subject to job release dates, Discrete Applied Mathematics 105 (2000) 129–136]. If we are allowed to postpone start of jobs, the performance guarantee can be improved to 1.618. We provide a simpler proof of this best known lower bound for bounded and unbounded batch sizes. We then present deterministic algorithms that are best possible for the problem with unbounded batch size (i.e., b = ∞) and agreeable processing times (i.e., there cannot exist an on-line algorithm with a better performance guarantee). We then propose another algorithm that leads to a best possible algorithm for the general problem with unbounded batch size. This algorithm improves the best known on-line algorithm (i.e. [G. Zhang, X. Cai, C.K. Wong, On-line algorithms for minimizing makespan on batch processing machines, Naval Research Logistics 48 (2001) 241–258]) in the sense that it produces a shortest makespan while ensuring the same worst-case performance guarantee.     

Preemptive scheduling of two uniform parallel machines to minimize total tardiness

We consider the problem of preemptive scheduling n jobs on two uniform parallel machines. All jobs have equal processing requirements. For each job we are given its due date. The objective is to find a schedule minimizing total tardiness ∑T_i. We suggest an O(n log n) algorithm to solve this problem.     

The just-in-time scheduling problem in a flow-shop scheduling system

We study the problem of maximizing the weighted number of just-in-time (JIT) jobs in a flow-shop scheduling system under four different scenarios. The first scenario is where the flow-shop includes only two machines and all the jobs have the same gain for being completed JIT. For this scenario, we provide an O(n³) time optimization algorithm which is faster than the best known algorithm in the literature. The second scenario is where the job processing times are machine-independent. For this scenario, the scheduling system is commonly referred to as a proportionate flow-shop. We show that in this case, the problem of maximizing the weighted number of JIT jobs is NP-hard in the ordinary sense for any arbitrary number of machines. Moreover, we provide a fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for its solution and a polynomial time algorithm to solve the special case for which all the jobs have the same gain for being completed JIT. The third scenario is where a set of identical jobs is to be produced for different customers. For this scenario, we provide an O(n³) time optimization algorithm which is independent of the number of machines. We also show that the time complexity can be reduced to O(n log n) if all the jobs have the same gain for being completed JIT. In the last scenario, we study the JIT scheduling problem on m machines with a no-wait restriction and provide an O(mn²) time optimization algorithm.     

Fast approximation algorithm for job sequencing with deadlines

The problem under consideration is to schedule jobs on a machine in order to minimize the sum of the penalties of delayed jobs. A “range-and-bound” method is proposed for finding a tight bound P? such that P?≤P1≤2P?, P1 being the minimal sum desired. The considered scheduling problem, for n jobs and accuracy ε > 0, is solved by a fully polynomial ε-approximation algorithm in $\text{O(n}{}^2\text{log n +}\text{n}{}^2\text{ε}\text{)}$ time and $\text{O(}\text{n}{}^2\text{ε}\text{)}$ space.     

Approximating Fixed Points of Weakly Contracting Mappings

We consider the problem of approximating fixed points of contractive functions whose contraction factor is close to 1. In a previous paper (1993, K. Sikorski et al., J. Complexity9, 181–200), we proved that for the absolute error criterion, the upper bound on the number of function evaluations to compute ε-approximations is O(n³(ln(1/ε)+ln(1/(1−q))+ln n)) in the worst case, where 0<q<1 is the contraction factor in the Euclidean norm and n is the dimension of the problem. This upper bound is achieved by the circumscribed ellipsoid (CE) algorithm combined with a dimensional deflation process. In this paper we present an inscribed ellipsoid (IE) algorithm that enjoys O(n(ln(1/ε)+ln(1/(1−q)))) bound. For q close to 1, the IE algorithm thus runs in many fewer iterations than the simple iteration method, that requires ⌈ln(1/ε)/ln(1/q)⌉ function evaluations. Our analysis also implies that: (1) The dimensional deflation procedure in the CE algorithm is not necessary and that the resulting “plain” CE algorithm enjoys O(n²(log(1/ε)+log(1/(1−q)))) upper bound on the number of function evaluations. (2) The IE algorithm solves the problem in the residual sense, i.e., computes x such that 6f(x)−x6⩽δ, with O(n ln(1/δ)) function evaluations for every q⩽1.     

Exact and approximation algorithms for the min–max k-traveling salesmen problem on a tree

Given k identical salesmen, where k ? 2 is a constant independent of the input size, the min–max k-traveling salesmen problem on a tree is to determine a set of k tours for the salesmen to serve all customers that are located on a tree-shaped network, so that each tour starts from and returns to the root of the tree with the maximum total edge weight of the tours minimized. The problem is known to be NP-hard even when k = 2. In this paper, we have developed a pseudo-polynomial time exact algorithm for this problem with any constant k ? 2, closing a question that has remained open for a decade. Along with this, we have further developed a (1 + ?)-approximation algorithm for any ? > 0.