Unique representation domains, II

Given a star operation ∗ of finite type, we call a domain R a ∗-unique representation domain (∗-URD) if each ∗-invertible ∗-ideal of R can be uniquely expressed as a ∗-product of pairwise ∗-comaximal ideals with prime radical. When ∗ is the t-operation we call the ∗-URD simply a URD. Any unique factorization domain is a URD. Generalizing and unifying results due to Zafrullah [M. Zafrullah, On unique representation domains, J. Nat. Sci. Math. 18 (1978) 19-29] and Brewer-Heinzer [J.W. Brewer, W.J. Heinzer, On decomposing ideals into products of comaximal ideals, Comm. Algebra 30 (2002) 5999-6010], we give conditions for a ∗-ideal to be a unique ∗-product of pairwise ∗-comaximal ideals with prime radical and characterize ∗-URD’s. We show that the class of URD’s includes rings of Krull type, the generalized Krull domains introduced by El Baghdadi and weakly Matlis domains whose t-spectrum is treed. We also study when the property of being a URD extends to some classes of overrings, such as polynomial extensions, rings of fractions and rings obtained by the D+XD_S[X] construction.     

The t#-property for integral domains

Generalizing work of Gilmer and Heinzer, we define a t#-domain to be a domain R in which for any two distinct subsets and of the set of maximal t-ideals of R. We provide characterizations of these domains, and we show that polynomial rings over t#-domains are again t#-domains. Finally, we study overrings of t#-domains.     

Some characterizations of Krull domains

In this paper, we define the v-finiteness for a length function L_v on the set of all v-ideals of an integral domain R and show that R is a Krull domain if and only if every proper integral v-ideal of R has v-finite length and L_v((AB)_v)=L_v(A)+L_v(B) for every pair of proper integral v-ideals A and B in R. We also give Euclidean-like characterizations of factorial, Krull, and π-domains. Finally we define the notion of quasi-∗-invertibility and show that if every proper prime t-ideal of an integral domain R is quasi-t-invertible, then R is a Krull domain.     

Power series extensions of half-factorial domains

An integral domain is said to be a half-factorial domain (HFD) if every non-zero element a that is not a unit may be factored into a finite product of irreducible elements, while any other such factorization of a has the same number of irreducible factors. While it is known that a power series extension of a factorial domain need not be factorial, the corresponding question for HFD has been open. In this paper we show that the answer is also negative. In the process we answer in the negative, for HFD, an open question of Samuel for factorial domains by showing that for certain quadratic domains R, and independent variables, Y and T, R[[Y]][[T]] is not HFD even when R[[Y]] is HFD. The proof hinges on Samuel’s theorem to the effect that a power series, in finitely many variables, over a regular factorial domain is factorial.     

On the class group and S-class group of formal power series rings

Let ${\text{Cl}}_t(A)$ denote the t-class group of an integral domain A. P. Samuel has established that if A is a Krull domain then the mapping ${\text{Cl}}_t(A)\to {\text{Cl}}_t(A?X?)$, is injective and if A is a regular UFD, then ${\text{Cl}}_t(A)\to {\text{Cl}}_t(A?X?)$, is bijective. Later, L. Claborn extended this result in case A is a regular Noetherian domain. In the first part of this paper we prove that the mapping ${\text{Cl}}_t(A)\to {\text{Cl}}_t(A?X?)$; $[I]?[{(I.A?X?)}_t]$ is an injective homomorphism and in case of an integral domain A such that each υ-invertible υ-ideal of A has υ-finite type, we give an equivalent condition for ${\text{Cl}}_t(A)\to {\text{Cl}}_t(A?X?)$, to be bijective, thus generalizing the result of Claborn. In the second part of this paper, we define the S-class group of an integral domain A: let S be a (not necessarily saturated) multiplicative subset of an integral domain A. Following [11], a nonzero fractional ideal I of A is S-principal if there exist an $s\in S$ and $a\in I$ such that $sI?aA?I$. The S-class group of A, S-${\text{Cl}}_t(A)$ is the group of fractional t-invertible t-ideals of A under t-multiplication modulo its subgroup of S-principal t-invertible t-ideals of A. We generalize some known results developed for the classic contexts of Krull and PυMD domain and we investigate the case of isomorphism S-${\text{Cl}}_t(A)?S$-${\text{Cl}}_t(A?X?)$.     

The class semigroup of local one-dimensional domains

Let R be a local one-dimensional domain. We investigate when the class semigroup S(R) of R is a Clifford semigroup. We make use of the Archimedean valuation domains which dominate R, as a main tool to study its class semigroup. We prove that if S(R) is Clifford, then every element of the integral closure of R is quadratic. As a consequence, such an R may be dominated by at most two distinct Archimedean valuation domains, and coincides with their intersection. When S(R) is Clifford, we find conditions for S(R) to be a Boolean semigroup. We derive that R is almost perfect with Boolean class semigroup if, and only if R is stable. We also find results on S(R), through examination of [V/P:R/M] and v(M), where V dominates R, and P, M are the respective maximal ideals.     

Star stable domains

We introduce and study the notion of ?-stability with respect to a semistar operation ? defined on a domain R; in particular we consider the case where ? is the w-operation. This notion allows us to generalize and improve several properties of stable domains and totally divisorial domains.     

When graded domains are Schreier or pre-Schreier

We characterize, in terms of properties of homogeneous elements, when a graded domain is pre-Schreier or Schreier. As a consequence, the following properties of a commutative monoid domain A[M] are equivalent: (1) A[M] is pre-Schreier; (2) A[M] is Schreier; (3) A and M are Schreier. This is in contrast to pre-Schreier monoids and pre-Schreier integral domains, which need not be Schreier.     

Generalized cover ideals and the persistence property

Let I   be a square-free monomial ideal in R=k[_x1,…,_xn]$R=k[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$, and consider the sets of associated primes Ass(I^s)$\mathrm{Ass}(I^s)$ for all integers s?1$s?1$. Although it is known that the sets of associated primes of powers of I eventually stabilize, there are few results about the power at which this stabilization occurs (known as the index of stability). We introduce a family of square-free monomial ideals that can be associated to a finite simple graph G that generalizes the cover ideal construction. When G   is a tree, we explicitly determine Ass(I^s)$\mathrm{Ass}(I^s)$ for all s?1$s?1$. As consequences, not only can we compute the index of stability, we can also show that this family of ideals has the persistence property.     

Polynomial cycles in finitely generated domains

LetR be a finitely generated domain of zero characteristics, and letN be a given integer. We show that the lengths of all cycles of polynomial mappingsR ^NR ^N defined overR are bounded by a number depending only onR andN.The work of the second author has been supported by the KBN-grant 2-1037-91-01.     

TW-domains and Strong Mori domains

In this paper we are mainly concerned with TW-domains, i.e., domains in which the w- and t-operations coincide. Precisely, we investigate possible connections with related well-known classes. We characterize the TW-property in terms of divisoriality for Mori domains and Noetherian domains. Specifically, we prove that a Mori domain R is a TW-domain if and only if R_M is a divisorial domain for each t-maximal ideal M of R. It turns out that a Mori domain which is a TW-domain is a Strong Mori domain. The last section examines the transfer of the “TW-domain” and “Strong Mori” properties to pullbacks, in order to provide some original examples.     

Products of idempotent matrices over integral domains

We say that a ring R has the idempotent matrices property if every square singular matrix over R is a product of idempotent matrices. It is known that every field, and more generally, every Euclidean domain has the idempotent matrices property. In this paper we show that not every integral domain has the idempotent matrices property and that if a projective free ring has the idempotent matrices property then it must be a Bezout domain. We also show that a principal ideal domain has the idempotent matrices property if and only if every fraction a/b with b≠0 has a finite continued fraction expansion. New proofs are also provided for the results that every field and every Euclidean domain have the idempotent matrices property.     

Trivial extensions defined by Prüfer conditions

This paper deals with well-known extensions of the Prüfer domain concept to arbitrary commutative rings. We investigate the transfer of these notions in trivial ring extensions (also called idealizations) of commutative rings by modules and then generate original families of rings with zero-divisors subject to various Prüfer conditions. The new examples give further evidence for the validity of the Bazzoni-Glaz conjecture on the weak global dimension of Gaussian rings. Moreover, trivial ring extensions allow us to widen the scope of validity of Kaplansky-Tsang conjecture on the content ideal of Gaussian polynomials.     

Almost equal group multiplications

In a recent paper entitled “A commutative analogue of the group ring” we introduced, for each finite group (G,⋅), a commutative graded Z-algebra R_(G,⋅) which has a close connection with the cohomology of (G,⋅). The algebra R_(G,⋅) is the quotient of a polynomial algebra by a certain ideal I_(G,⋅) and it remains a fundamental open problem whether or not the group multiplication ⋅ on G can always be recovered uniquely from the ideal I_(G,⋅).Suppose now that (G,×) is another group with the same underlying set G and identity element e∈G such that I_(G,⋅)=I_(G,×). Then we show here that the multiplications ⋅ and × are at least “almost equal” in a precise sense which renders them indistinguishable in terms of most of the standard group theory constructions. In particular in many cases (for example if (G,⋅) is Abelian or simple) this implies that the two multiplications are actually equal as was claimed in the previously cited paper.     

Note on non-D-rings

Abstract

Recall that an integral domain R is said to be a non-D-ring if there exists a non-constant polynomial f (X) in R[X] (called a uv-polynomial) such that f (a) is a unit of R for every a in R. In this note we generalize this notion to commutative rings (that are not necessarily integral domains) as follows: for a positive integer n, we say that R is an n-non-D-ring if there exists a polynomial f of degree n in R[X] such that f (a) is a unit of R for every a in R. We then investigate the properties of this notion in di?erent contexts of commutative rings.     

On the arithmetic of tame monoids with applications to Krull monoids and Mori domains

Let H be an atomic monoid (e.g., the multiplicative monoid of a noetherian domain). For an element b∈H, let ω(H,b) be the smallest  N∈N₀∪{∞} having the following property: if  n∈N and  a₁,…,a_n∈H are such that b divides  a₁⋅…⋅a_n, then b already divides a subproduct of a₁⋅…⋅a_n consisting of at most N factors. The monoid H is called tame if . This is a well-studied property in factorization theory, and for various classes of domains there are explicit criteria for being tame. In the present paper, we show that, for a large class of Krull monoids (including all Krull domains), the monoid is tame if and only if the associated Davenport constant is finite. Furthermore, we show that tame monoids satisfy the Structure Theorem for Sets of Lengths. That is, we prove that in a tame monoid there is a constant M such that the set of lengths of any element is an almost arithmetical multiprogression with bound M.     

Factoring ideals in Prüfer domains

We show that in certain Prüfer domains, each nonzero ideal I can be factored as , where I^v is the divisorial closure of I and is a product of maximal ideals. This is always possible when the Prüfer domain is h-local, and in this case such factorizations have certain uniqueness properties. This leads to new characterizations of the h-local property in Prüfer domains. We also explore consequences of these factorizations and give illustrative examples.