Experimental evidence on robustness of data envelopment analysis

There is an on-going debate about variable selection in data envelopment analysis (DEA) as there are no diagnostic checks for model misspecification. This paper contributes to this debate by investigating the sensitivity of DEA efficiency estimates to including inappropriate and/or omitting several important variables in a large-sample DEA model. Data are simulated from constant, increasing and decreasing returns-to-scale (RS) Cobb–Douglas production processes. For constant and decreasing RS processes with irrelevant inputs, DEA tends to overestimate efficiency in almost all production units. When relevant variables are omitted, variable RS appears to be a safer option. The correct RS specification is vital when the DEA model includes irrelevant variables. The effect of omission of relevant inputs on individual production unit efficiency is more adverse compared to the inclusion of irrelevant ones.     

On some generalization of the DEA models

Inadequate results may arise in some instances of DEA model applications. For example, a data envelopment analysis (DEA) model may show ‘a notoriously inefficient unit’ as an efficient one. In addition, too many efficient units may appear in some DEA models. An elegant and subtle approach was proposed to deal with these problems, which is based on incorporating domination cones in DEA models. Yu, Wei and Brockett suggested the generalized DEA (GDEA) model that unifies and extends most of the well-known DEA models based on using domination cones. In this paper, we propose a model that is more general than the GDEA model, on the one hand, as it covers situations that the GDEA model cannot describe. On the other hand, our model enables one to construct step-by-step any model from the family of the GDEA models by incorporating artificial units and rays in the space of inputs and outputs in the Banker, Charnes, Cooper (BCC) model, which makes the process of model construction visible and more understandable. Moreover, we show that any GDEA model can be approximated by some BCC model.     

Evaluating eco-efficiency with data envelopment analysis: an analytical reexamination

This paper reexamines the unintended consequences of the two widely cited models for measuring environmental efficiency—the hyperbolic efficiency model (HEM) and directional distance function (DDF). I prove the existence of three main problems: (1) these two models are not monotonic in undesirable outputs (i.e., a firm’s efficiency may increase when polluting more, and vice versa), (2) strongly dominated firms may appear efficient, and (3) some firms’ environmental efficiency scores may be computed against strongly dominated points. Using the supply-chain carbon emissions data from the 50 major U.S. manufacturing companies, I empirically compare these two models with a weighted additive DEA model. The empirical results corroborate the analytical findings that the DDF and HEM models can generate spurious efficiency estimates and must be used with extreme caution.     

How to generate regularly behaved production data? A Monte Carlo experimentation on DEA scale efficiency measurement

Monte Carlo experimentation is a well-known approach used to test the performance of alternative methodologies under different hypotheses. In the frontier analysis framework, whatever the parametric or non-parametric methods tested, experiments to date have been developed assuming single output multi-input production functions. The data generated have mostly assumed a Cobb–Douglas technology. Among other drawbacks, this simple framework does not allow the evaluation of DEA performance on scale efficiency measurement. The aim of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, we show how reliable two-output two-input production data can be generated using a parametric output distance function approach. A variable returns to scale translog technology satisfying regularity conditions is used for this purpose. On the other hand, we evaluate the accuracy of DEA technical and scale efficiency measurement when sample size and output ratios vary. Our Monte Carlo experiment shows that the correlation between true and estimated scale efficiency is dramatically low when DEA analysis is performed with small samples and wide output ratio variations.     

Measurement of the worst practice of decision-making units in the presence of non-discretionary factors and imprecise data

The objective of the present paper is to propose a novel pair of data envelopment analysis (DEA) models for measurement of relative efficiencies of decision-making units (DMUs) in the presence of non-discretionary factors and imprecise data. Compared to traditional DEA, the proposed interval DEA approach measures the efficiency of each DMU relative to the inefficiency frontier, also called the input frontier, and is called the worst relative efficiency or pessimistic efficiency. On the other hand, in traditional DEA, the efficiency of each DMU is measured relative to the efficiency frontier and is called the best relative efficiency or optimistic efficiency. The pair of proposed interval DEA models takes into account the crisp, ordinal, and interval data, as well as non-discretionary factors, simultaneously for measurement of relative efficiencies of DMUs. Two numeric examples will be provided to illustrate the applicability of the interval DEA models.     

Relative Efficiency Assessments Using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Data on Rates Departments

This paper examines the nature of information obtained from data envelopment analysis (DEA) in comparative studies of the efficiency of decision-making units, and it discusses the interpretation and practical usefulness of such information. The themes developed in the paper are illustrated by an application of DEA to data on the rate-collection function of London Boroughs and Metropolitan District Councils. The paper begins with an overview of DEA, followed by a discussion of some of the practical considerations arising in the application of DEA. It then describes the structuring of the rate-collection function for assessment by DEA, and explores the extent to which units can be classified as relatively efficient or inefficient. In respect of relatively inefficient units, it illustrates the construction of target inputs and outputs so that their relative efficiency may improve. In respect of relatively efficient units, it is argued that their identification is weak in the sense that for some of them their apparent efficiency may be simply a reflection of an uncommon input-output profile. It is shown, nevertheless, that information about relatively efficient units can be used to identify those of them which may prove examples of good operating practice in given aspects of their function. (Readers not familiar with British taxes may wish to note that rates are a tax on property, levied by local authorities.)     

A generalized model for data envelopment analysis with interval data

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method to estimate the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) performing similar tasks in a production system that consumes multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. So far, a number of DEA models with interval data have been developed. The CCR model with interval data, the BCC model with interval data and the FDH model with interval data are well known as basic DEA models with interval data. In this study, we suggest a model with interval data called interval generalized DEA (IGDEA) model, which can treat the stated basic DEA models with interval data in a unified way. In addition, by establishing the theoretical properties of the relationships among the IGDEA model and those DEA models with interval data, we prove that the IGDEA model makes it possible to calculate the efficiency of DMUs incorporating various preference structures of decision makers.     

基于Shephard距离函数的DEA TOPSIS方法研究

本文通过对Shephard距离函数的引入,正式构建了DEA TOPSIS决策单元排序方法的框架。本文首先定义了正(负)理想决策制定单元(DMU)以及相应的(反)生产可能集,然后在考虑正(负)理想DMU的条件下分别给出DMU的(反)效率评价模型以及对应的Shephard距离函数,然后基于评价对象到理想DMU相对接近度这一综合评价值给出了DMU的一个完全排序。最后,本文通过算例分析说明了该方法的有效性和实用性。     

基于DEA的县域两型农业生产效率评价

在建立两型农业发展状况评价指标体系的基础上,运用DEA方法对湖南省衡阳县两型农业生产的效率进行评价.分析表明,7个乡镇在短期内通过一定的投入调整,可以提高农业投入产出效率.20个乡镇通过适度增加规模便可提高农业生产效率.从总体上来看,衡阳县两型农业生产效率较高,规模效率和技术效率比较明显.根据评价结果,对衡阳县发展两型...     

非期望产出的DEA效率评价

将非期望产出作为投入应用到传统DEA模型上,解决了非期望产出生产活动的效率评价问题.结合生产可能集,将非期望产出直接反映到生产可能集中,建立了基于投入导向的径向和非径向两种DEA模型.并对两种DEA模型效率值的大小关系、相对有效性的等价性问题进行了证明,指出非径向DEA模型更能准确的实现效率定量评价.     

具有包容关系的结构异质DEA效率评价方法

指标结构同质是数据包络分析（DEA）方法的基本假设之一;然而,现实问题的复杂性使得该假设常常难以完全被满足.针对具有包容关系的产出结构异质问题,通过解析决策单元（DMU）之间生产结构的内在关系来构建一种分阶段的DEA效率评价方法.该方法充分考虑了不同结构DMU的主观偏好,较好地规避了传统DEA方法在结构异质DMU效率评价过程中的不公平性.随后,该方法分别被拓展至投入结构异质和多重结构异质的情境中.最后,通过两个算例来说明本文方法的有效性与实用性.     

Measuring dynamic efficiency: Theories and an integrated methodology

Almost all dynamic production systems are subject to lagged productive effects, which are an often-ignored latent source of interference in the efficiency measuring process. Existing data envelopment analysis (DEA) approaches rely on a static production environment. They can easily lead to biased evaluation results due to the erroneous assumption. To tackle this issue, this paper develops a dynamic DEA model that allows intertemporal effects in efficiency measuring. Specifically, the dynamic DEA model incorporates dynamic factors via a linear parametric formulation. Our model can be applied in place of static DEA models to a wide range of applications, such as analyzing longitudinal firm performance and productivity changes. As for the empirical efficiencies, we demonstrate how the lag parameters in the dynamic model can be estimated by the panel vector autoregressive model (PVAR). We use our methodology to evaluate advertising efficiencies of several major automobile and pharmaceutical firms in North America. The result shows that using static DEA in dynamic production can lead to both rank reversals and changes in efficiency scores.     

链式网络DEA模型

数据包络分析(DEA)是评价决策单元(DMU)相对有效性的一种工具,现已得到广泛的应用.传统的DEA不考虑系统内部结构,而是将系统作为一个"黑箱"来度量效率.针对多阶段网络结构提出一个新的网络DEA模型—链式网络DEA模型.研究网络决策单元的网络DEA有效性及各个阶段的弱DEA有效性之间的关系,给出了网络DEA有效的充分必要条件.若网络决策单元不是网络DEA有效的,根据模型可以指出系统在哪些阶段是无效的.     

基于SFA与DEA模型的创新型城市科技创新效率实证研究

分别运用SFA模型和DEA模型对10个样本城市2001-2010年的科技创新效率进行定量测度,并对两种方法测度出的创新型城市科技创新效率值排序进行相关分析和一致性检验.结果表明两种方法测度出的创新型城市科技创新效率在数值上有显著差异,但在效率排序上具有很好的一致性.     

A new approach for technical efficiency estimation in multiple output production

The nonparametric technique of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been used to measure technical efficiency. This approach has proven useful because, unlike regression analyses, it allows multiple outputs and does not require a priori functional form specification. DEA does, however, require correct model specification; inclusion of inappropriate variables or omission of relevant variables leads to distortions. The purpose of this paper is to develop an alternative methodology based on canonical correlation to measure technical efficiency for multiple output production correspondences. Using simulated data, the new methodology is compared with DEA. The results indicate that the canonical regression approach outperforms DEA in most cases.     

Gradual technical and scale efficiency improvement in DEA

In data envelopment analysis (DEA) an inefficient unit can be projected onto an efficient target that is far away, i.e. reaching the target may demand large reductions in inputs and increases in outputs. When the inputs and outputs modifications planned are large, it may be troublesome to carry them out all at once. In order to help an inefficient unit reach a distant target, a strategy of gradual improvements with successive, intermediate targets has been proposed. This paper extends such approach to the variable returns to scale (VRS) case. In the VRS scenario we distinguish between units that are technical efficient and those that are not. On the one hand, for those units that are not technical efficient the proposed approach determines successive intermediate targets leading to the technical efficiency frontier, i.e. the priority for those units is to attain technical efficiency. On the other hand, for those units that are technical efficient but not scale efficient the proposed approach computes a sequence of targets ending in the global efficiency frontier, i.e. when technical efficiency is guaranteed the goal is then to attain global efficiency. In both cases, the successive targets are obtained by iteratively solving specific DEA models that take into account given bounds on the rates of change in inputs and outputs that the unit can implement in each step.     

测算具有方向技术效率的DEA方法

本文总结了现有技术效率的主要测算方法，借鉴定向技术距离函数思想，结合DEA思路，提出了一种新的用于技术效率指数测算的模型，并进一步探讨了如何识别决策单元的技术有效性和如何改进非技术有效决策单元的问题．着重分析了该技术效率指数模型与L型技术效率指数的关系，指出该模型是L型技术效率指数模型的一般形式．     

Bootstrapped efficiency estimates for a model for groups and hierarchies in DEA

We apply some recently introduced bootstrap techniques to derive bias corrected efficiency scores for a model for groups and hierarchies in DEA. The use of the bootstrap makes it possible to overcome some deficiencies of the original formulation of this model, which rests on rescaling individual efficiency scores using average efficiencies calculated from different subsets of the data. These average or structural efficiencies are differently biased and bias varies with sample size when standard DEA techniques are used. Bias correction makes it possible to identify the true differences in efficiency and thus to compare DMUs belonging to different groups via their rescaled individual efficiency scores on one common basis. Moreover, this type of bias problem is present in other DEA applications. Therefore, the method proposed to deal with it has many potential applications beyond the groups and hierarchies model.     

Sensitivity analysis of inefficient units in data envelopment analysis

One important issue in DEA which has been studied by many DEA researchers is the sensitivity of the results of an analysis to perturbations in the data.This paper develops a procedure for performing a sensitivity analysis of the inefficient decision making units (DMUs). The procedure yields an exact “Necessary Change Region” in which the efficiency score of a specific inefficient DMU changes to a defined efficiency score.In what follows, we identify a new frontier, and prove the efficiency score of each arbitrary unit on it which is defined as the efficiency score.     

Short-run and long-run efficiency measures for multiplant firms

The usual Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model for measuring the relative efficiency assumes that all plants belong to distinct firms superior to them. For firms with more than one plant, Koopmans proposes a procedure for deriving the short-run production frontier for each firm. Modifying his idea, a DEA model is constructed in this paper for measuring the short-run efficiency of each plant within a firm. Based on the theory of production economics that the long-run production frontier is an envelop super-imposed upon all short-run production frontiers, another DEA model is constructed to measure the long-run efficiency of every plant. The long-run efficiency is always smaller than or equal to the short-run efficiency. Consequently, it is possible that an inefficient plant can only be improved in the long-run. With the models constructed in this paper, a decision-maker is able to distinguish between what can be achieved in the short-run and what in the long-run. To clarify the idea, an example of Taiwan forests is adopted for illustration. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.