Linked bis(β-diketiminato) yttrium and lanthanum complexes as catalysts in asymmetric hydroamination/cyclization of aminoalkenes (AHA)

Linked bis(β-diketiminato) rare-earth metal complexes based on the ethylene-bridged ligand [C₂H₄(BDI^DClP)₂]H₂ [DClP = 2,6-Cl₂C₆H₃] and the cyclohexyl-bridged ligands [Cy(BDI^Ar)₂]H₂ [Ar = PMP (= p-MeOC₆H₄), Mes (= 2,4,6-Me₃C₆H₂), DIPP (= 2,6-iPr₂C₆H₃)] were prepared via amine elimination starting from [Ln{N(SiMe₃)₂}₃] (Ln = La, Y). The three cyclohexyl-bridged complexes [{(R,R)-Cy(BDI^Mes)₂}YN(SiMe₃)₂] ((R,R)-3), [{(R,R)-Cy(BDI^Mes)₂}LaN(SiMe₃)₂] ((R,R)-4), and [{(R,R)-Cy(BDI^DIPP)₂}LaN(SiMe₃)₂] ((R,R)-5) were obtained enantiomerically pure. The X-ray crystal structure analysis of the racemic variants of 3 and 4 revealed a distorted square pyramidal coordination geometry around the rare-earth metal, in which the amido ligand occupies the apical position and the two linked β-diketiminato moieties form the basis. The two aromatic substituents adopt a transoid arrangement and both β-diketiminato moieties are bound in a η⁵ coordination mode with close Ln?C contacts. Due to the smaller ionic radius of yttrium vs. lanthanum, the front side of the yttrium complex 3 is sterically more hindered than in the lanthanum complex 4, but there is much more empty coordination space on the rear side, which may rationalize the observed differences in selectivity of 3 in comparison to 4. The catalytic efficiency of the β-diketiminato complexes was strongly affected by steric factors such as ionic radius of the metal and the steric bulk of the aryl substituents, which is an indication for highly steric encumbered catalytic species. The complexes displayed good to moderate catalytic activity in the hydroamination/cyclization of aminoalkenes depending on the steric hindrance around the metal center. The sterically most demanding diisopropylphenyl-substituted complex (R,R)-5 displayed significantly higher enantioselectivities (up to 76% ee), but lower catalytic activity in comparison to the sterically more open mesityl-substituted complex (R,R)-4. The smaller yttrium metal center in complex (R,R)-3 led to reduced activity as well as a reversal in enantioselectivity, which may be rationalized by a change of the approach of the alkene moiety to the Ln-amido bond in the cyclization transition state.     

A series of novel 2,6-bis(imino)pyridyl iron catalysts: synthesis, characterization and ethylene oligomerization

A series of novel 2,6-bis(imino)pyridyl iron complexes {2,6-(2-X-4-Y-5-ZC₆H₂NCCH₃)₂C₅H₃N}FeCl₂ (X = Cl, Y = CH₃, Z = H (2); X = Br, Y = CH₃, Z = H (3); X = F, Y = H, Z = CH₃ (4); X = Cl, Y = H, Z = CH₃ (5); X = Cl, Y = F (7)) have been synthesized and characterized with elemental analysis and IR. These iron coordinative complexes, activated with methylaluminoxane (MAO), lead to highly active ethylene oligomerization (>10⁷ g/mol Fe h) and the products are mostly linear α-olefins (>90%). The catalytic activities and product properties depend on the substituents on aryl rings and the reaction conditions. As reaction temperature increases, the catalytic activities decrease rapidly and more low-molar-mass products are produced. The product distributions are almost independent of the Al/Fe molar ratio, but the catalytic activities change in different trends when the ortho-substituents on the aryl rings are different. The other three complexes have also been synthesized for comparison to investigate the steric hindrance and electronic effect on the properties of complexes. The complex with adaptable steric hindrance and electronic properties exhibits the highest catalytic activities.     

Effect of chelating agent on the oxidation rate of PCP in the magnetite/H2O2 system at neutral pH

The complex [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂ reacts with two molar equivalent of pyridine carboxylic acids ligands Py-2-COOH(a), Py-3-COOH(b) and Py-4-COOH(c) to yield rhodium(I) dicarbonyl chelate complex [Rh(CO)₂(L^/)](1a) {L^/ = η²-(N,O) coordinated Py-2-COO⁻(a^/)} and non-chelate complexes [Rh(CO)₂ClL^//](1b,c) {L^// = η¹-(N) coordinated Py-3-COOH(b), Py-4-COOH(c)}. The complexes 1 undergo oxidative addition (OA) reactions with different electrophiles such as CH₃I, C₂H₅I, C₆H₅CH₂Cl and I₂ to give penta coordinated Rh(III) complexes of the types [Rh(CO)(CORⁿ)XL^/], {n = 1,2,3; R¹ = CH₃(2a); R² = C₂H₅(3a); X = I and R³ = CH₂C₆H₅ (4a); X = Cl}, [Rh(CO)I₂L^/](5a), [Rh(CO)(CORⁿ)ClXL^//] {R¹ = CH₃(6b,c); R² = C₂H₅(7b,c); X = I and R³ = CH₂C₆H₅ (8b,c); X = Cl} and [Rh(CO)ClI₂L^//](9b,c). The complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis, IR and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. Kinetic data for the reaction of 1a–b with CH₃I indicate a first order reaction. The catalytic activity of 1a–c for the carbonylation of methanol to acetic acid and its ester is evaluated and a higher turn over number (TON = 810–1094) is obtained compared with that of the well-known commercial species [Rh(CO)₂I₂]⁻ (TON = 653) at mild reaction conditions (temperature 130 ± 5 °C, pressure 35 ± 5 bar).     

Reactivity of intramolecularly coordinated aluminum compounds to R3EOH (E = Sn,Si). Remarkable migration of N,C,N and O,C,O pincer ligands

The reaction of organoaluminum compounds containing O,C,O or N,C,N chelating (so called pincer) ligands [2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]AlⁱBu₂ (Y = MeO 1, ^tBuO 2, Me₂N 3) with R₃SnOH (R = Ph or Me) gives tetraorganotin complexes [2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]SnR₃ (Y = MeO, R = Ph 4, Y = MeO, R = Me 5; Y = ^tBuO, R = Ph 6, Y = ^tBuO, R = Me 7; Y = Me₂N, R = Ph 8, Y = Me₂N, R = Me 9) as the result of migration of O,C,O or N,C,N pincer ligands from aluminum to tin atom. Reaction of 1 and 2 with (ⁿBu₃Sn)₂O proceeded in similar fashion resulting in 10 and 11 ([2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]SnⁿBu₃, Y = MeO 10; Y = ^tBuO 11) in mixture with ⁿBu₃SnⁱBu. The reaction 1 and 3 with 2 equiv. of Ph₃SiOH followed another reaction path and ([2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]Al(OSiPh₃)₂, Y = MeO 12, Me₂N 13) were observed as the products of alkane elimination. The organotin derivatives 4–11 were characterized by the help of elemental analysis, ESI-MS technique, ¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy and in the case 6 and 8 by single crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD). Compounds 12 and 13 were identified using elemental analysis,¹H, ¹³C, ²⁹Si NMR and IR spectroscopy.     

Molybdenum complexes bearing a diaminosubstituted-phosphiteboryl ligand: Syntheses,structures, and reactivity involving the Mo–B,B–P,and B–H activation

Photoreaction of diaminosubstituted-phosphiteborane, BH₃P(NMeCH₂)₂(OMe) with a methyl molybdenum complex, (η⁵-C₅R₅)Mo(CO)₃Me (R₅ = Me₅, Me₄H, H₅) yielded a phosphiteboryl molybdenum complex, (η⁵-C₅R₅)Mo(CO)₃BH₂{P(NMeCH₂)₂(OMe)} (R₅ = Me₅: 2, Me₄H: 3, H₅: 4). In the reaction of 2 with MeI, the Mo–B bond was activated to give (η⁵-C₅Me₅)Mo(CO)₃Me, in the reaction with PMe₃, the B–P bond was activated to give (η⁵-C₅Me₅)Mo(CO)₃(BH₂PMe₃). Complex 2 in solution was gradually converted into (η⁵-C₅Me₅)MoH(CO)₂{P(NMeCH₂)₂(OMe)} (8) via the B–H bond activation of 2. Structures of 2, 3, and 8 were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction studies.     

Enantioselective 1,4-addition of arylboronic acids to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds catalyzed by rhodium(I)-chiral phosphoramidite complexes

A chiral bidentate phosphoramidite (5a) was synthesized from Shibasaki’s linked-(R)-BINOL and P(NMe₂)₃ as a new ligand for rhodium(I)-catalyzed asymmetric 1,4-addition of arylboronic acids to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds. The effects of 5a and Feringa’s monodentate phosphoramidite (4, R¹, R² = Et) on the yields and enantioselectivities were fully investigated. The reaction was significantly accelerated in the presence of a base such as KOH and Et₃N, allowing the reaction to be completed at the lower temperatures than 50 °C. The addition to cyclic enones such as 2-cyclopentenone, 2-cyclohexenone and 2-cycloheptenone at 50 °C in the presence of an [Rh(coe)₂Cl]₂-4 (R¹, R² = Et) complex resulted in enantioselectivities up to 98%, though it was less effective for acyclic enones (0–70% ee). On the other hand, a complex between [Rh(nbd)₂]BF₄ and 5a completed the addition to cyclic enones within 2 h at room temperature in the presence of Et₃N with 86–99% yields and 96–99.8% ee. This catalyst was also effective for acyclic enones, resulting in 62–98% yields and 66–94% ee. The 1,4-additions of arylboronic acids to unsaturated lactones and acyclic esters with rhodium(I)-phosphoramidites complexes were also investigated.     

Synthesis and structure of mono- and di-nuclear complexes of ortho-palladated derived from phosphorus ylides

The phosphorus ylides Ph₃PCHC(O)C₆H₄R (R = 4-Me 1a, 4-Br 1b) react with PdCl₂ in equimolar ratios to give the C,C-orthopalladated [Pd{CHP(C₆H₄)Ph₂CO-C₆H₄-R)}(μ-Cl)]₂ (R = 4-Me 2a, 4-Br 2b) which react with NaClO₄/dppe, NaClO₄/dppm, py and PPh₃ to give the mononuclear derivatives [Pd{CH{P(C₆H₄)Ph₂}COC₆H₄-R}(dppe-P,P′)[(ClO₄) (R = 4-Me 3a, 4-Br 3b), [Pd{CH{P(C₆H₄)Ph₂}COC₆H₄-R}(dppm-P,P′)[(ClO₄ ( (R = 4-Me 4a, 4-Br 4b), [Pd{CH{P(C₆H₄)Ph₂}COC₆H₄-R}Cl(L)] (L = py, R = 4-Me 5a, 4-Br 5b, L = PPh₃, R = 4-Me 6a, 4-Br 6b). The C, C-metalated chelate are demonstrated by an X-ray diffraction study of 3a and 4a. Characterization of the obtained compounds was also performed by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H, ³¹P, and ¹³C NMR.     

Stereochemistry of the insertion of disubstituted alkynes into the metal aminocarbyne bond in diiron complexes

Terminal alkynes (HCCR^′) (R^′=COOMe, CH₂OH) insert into the metal-carbyne bond of the diiron complexes [Fe₂{μ-CN(Me)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(NCMe)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R=Xyl, 1a; CH₂Ph, 1b; Me, 1c; Xyl=2,6-Me₂C₆H₃), affording the corresponding μ-vinyliminium complexes [Fe₂{μ-σ:η³-C(R^′)CHCN(Me)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R=Xyl, R^′=COOMe, 2; R=CH₂Ph, R^′=COOMe, 3; R=Me, R^′=COOMe, 4; R=Xyl, R^′=CH₂OH, 5; R=Me, R^′=CH₂OH, 6). The insertion is regiospecific and C-C bond formation selectively occurs between the carbyne carbon and the CH moiety of the alkyne. Disubstituted alkynes (R^′CCR^′) also insert into the metal-carbyne bond leading to the formation of [Fe₂{μ-σ:η³-C(R^′)C(R^′)CN(Me)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R^′=Me, R=Xyl, 8; R^′=Et, R=Xyl, 9; R^′=COOMe, R=Xyl, 10; R^′=COOMe, R=CH₂Ph, 11; R^′=COOMe, R=Me, 12). Complexes 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 and 11, in which the iminium nitrogen is unsymmetrically substituted, give rise to E and/or Z isomers. When iminium substituents are Me and Xyl, the NMR and structural investigations (X-ray structure analysis of 2 and 8) indicate that complexes obtained from terminal alkynes preferentially adopt the E configuration, whereas those derived from internal alkynes are exclusively Z. In complexes 8 and 9, trans and cis isomers have been observed, by NMR spectroscopy, and the structures of trans-8 and cis-8 have been determined by X-ray diffraction studies. Trans to cis isomerization occurs upon heating in THF at reflux temperature. In contrast to the case of HCCR^′, the insertion of 2-hexyne is not regiospecific: both [Fe₂{μ-σ:η³-C(CH₂CH₂CH₃)C(Me)CN(Me)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R=Xyl, 13; R=Me, 15) and [Fe₂{μ-σ:η³-C(Me)C(CH₂CH₂CH₃)CN(Me)(R)}(μ-CO)(CO)(Cp)₂][SO₃CF₃] (R=Xyl, 14, R=Me, 16) are obtained and these compounds are present in solution as a mixture of cis and trans isomers, with predominance of the former.     

Reaction of isocyanides with iminophosphorane-based carbene ligands: Synthesis of unprecedented ketenimine–ruthenium complexes

The RuC bond of the bis(iminophosphorano)methandiide-based ruthenium(II) carbene complexes [Ru(η⁶-p-cymene)(κ²-C,N-C[P{NP(O)(OR)₂}Ph₂]₂)] (R = Et (1), Ph (2)) undergoes a C–C coupling process with isocyanides to afford ketenimine derivatives [Ru(η⁶-p-cymene)(κ³-C,C,N-C(CNR′)[P{NP(O)(OR)₂}Ph₂]₂)] (R = Et, R′ = Bz (3a), 2,6-C₆H₃Me₂ (3b), Cy (3c); R = Ph, R′ = Bz (4a), 2,6-C₆H₃Me₂ (4b), Cy (4c)). Compounds 3–4a–c represent the first examples of ketenimine–ruthenium complexes reported to date. Protonation of 3–4a with HBF₄ · Et₂O takes place selectively at the ketenimine nitrogen atom yielding the cationic derivatives [Ru(η⁶-p-cymene)(κ³-C,C,N-C(CNHBz)[P{NP(O)(OR)₂}Ph₂]₂)][BF₄] (R = Et (5a), Ph (6a)).     

Mono- and di-nuclear complexes of thiosemicarbazones with copper(I): Synthesis,spectroscopy and structures

Reactions of copper(I) halides with a series of thiosemicarbazones, namely, benzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (R¹R²CN–NH–C(S)–NH₂, R¹ = Ph, R² = H; Hbtsc), 2-benzoylpyridine thiosemicarbazone (R¹ = Ph, R² = py; Hbpytsc), and acetone thiosemicarbazone (R¹ = R² = Me; Hactsc), in the presence of PPh₃ has formed dimeric complexes, viz. sulfur bridged [Cu₂(μ-S-Hbtsc)₂Br₂(PPh₃)₂]·2H₂O (1), iodo-bridged [Cu₂(μ-I)₂(η¹-S-Hbtsc)₂(PPh₃)₂] (2), and heterobridged [Cu₂(μ₃-S,N³-Hactsc)(η¹-Br)(μ-Br)(PPh₃)₂] (3), as well as mononuclear complexes [CuX(η¹-S-Hbpytsc)(PPh₃)₂]·CH₃CN (X = Br, 4; Cl, 5). Complexes 1, 2, 4 and 5 involve thiosemicarbazone ligands in η¹-S bonding mode while in compound 3, ligand acts in N³, S-chelation-cum-S-bridging mode (μ₃-S,N³ mode). The intermolecular interactions such as, N²H?X, HN¹H?X (X = S, Br, Cl), CH?π interactions lead to 2D networks. All the complexes have been characterized with the help of elemental analyses, IR, ¹H, and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy, and single crystal X-ray crystallography. The role of a solvent in alteration of nuclearity and bonding modes of complexes has been highlighted.     

[Pd(Fmes)2(tmeda)]: A Case of Intermittent C?H⋅⋅⋅F?C Hydrogen‐Bond Interaction in Solution

The X‐ray structure of the title compound [Pd(Fmes)₂(tmeda)] (Fmes=2,4,6‐tris(trifluoromethyl)phenyl; tmeda=N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine) shows the existence of uncommon C? H???F? C hydrogen‐bond interactions between methyl groups of the TMEDA ligand and ortho‐CF₃ groups of the Fmes ligand. The ¹⁹F NMR spectra in CD₂Cl₂ at very low temperature (157 K) detect restricted rotation for the two ortho‐CF₃ groups involved in hydrogen bonding, which might suggest that the hydrogen bond is responsible for this hindrance to rotation. However, a theoretical study of the hydrogen‐bond energy shows that it is too weak (about 7 kJ mol^?1) to account for the rotational barrier observed (ΔH^≠=26.8 kJ mol^?1), and it is the steric hindrance associated with the puckering of the TMEDA ligand that should be held responsible for most of the rotational barrier. At higher temperatures the rotation becomes fast, which requires that the hydrogen bond is continuously being split up and restored and exists only intermittently, following the pulse of the conformational changes of TMEDA.     

Synthesis,structure, and property of a triruthenium cluster having a μ-alkyl ligand: Transformation of a μ3(⊥)-alkyne ligand into a μ-alkyl ligand via a μ3-vinylidene complex

A triruthenium μ-alkyl complex, (Cp¹Ru)₃(μ-η²-HCHCH₂R)(μ-CO)₂(μ₃- CO) (2a, R = Ph; 2b, R = ^tBu, Cp¹ = η⁵-C₅Me₅), which contains a two-electron and three-center interaction among Ru, C, and H atoms, has been synthesized by the reaction of a perpendicularly coordinated 1-alkyne complex, {Cp¹Ru(μ-H)}₃(μ₃-η²:η²(⊥)-RCCH) (1a; R = Ph, 1b; R = ^tBu), with carbon monoxide. A diffraction study for 2b clearly represented the bridging neohexyl group on one Ru–Ru edge. This μ-alkyl group exhibited dynamic behavior resulting in site-exchange of the α-hydrogen atoms between the terminal and bridging positions, which was synchronized with the migration of the μ-alkyl groups between the two ruthenium atoms. The agostic C–H bond was readily cleaved upon pyrolysis. Whereas the μ-phenethylidene intermediate resulting from the σ-C–H bond cleavage has never been observed, a μ₃-phenethylidyne complex, {Cp¹Ru(μ-CO)}₃(μ₃-CCH₂Ph) (7a), and a μ₃-methylidyne complex, {Cp¹Ru(μ-CO)}₃(μ₃-CH) (8), were obtained by the successive C–H/C–H and C–H/C–C bond cleavages at the μ-alkyl moiety, respectively.     

1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of diaryldiazomethanes across N-ethoxy-carbonyl-N-(2,2,2-trichloroethylidene)amine and reactivity of the resulting 2-azabutadienes towards thiolates and cyclic amides

1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of diaryldiazomethanes Ar₂CN₂ across Cl₃C–CHN–CO₂Et 1 yields Δ³-1,2,4-triazolines 2. Thermolysis of 2 leads, via transient azomethine ylides 3, to diaryldichloroazabutadienes [Ar(Ar')CN–CHCCl₂] 4. Treatment of 4a (Ar = Ar' = C₆H₅) and 4c (Ar = Ar' = p-ClC₆H₄) with NaSR in DMF yields 2-azabutadienes [Ar₂CN–C(H)C(SR)₂] 5. In contrast, nucleophilic attack of NaStBu on 4 affords azadienic dithioethers [Ar₂CN–C(S^tBu)C(H)(S^tBu)] (7a Ar = C₆H₅; 7b Ar' = p-ClC₆H₄). The reaction of 4a with NaSEt conducted in neat EtSH produces [Ph₂CN–C(H)(SEt)–CCl₂H] 8, which after dehydrochloration by NaOMe and subsequent addition of NaSEt is converted to [Ph₂CN–C(SEt)C(H)(SEt)] 7c. Upon the reaction of 4c with NaSⁱPr, the intermediate dithioether [(p-ClC₆H₄)₂CN–CHC(SⁱPr)₂] 5k is converted to tetrakisthioether [(p-ⁱPrSC₆H₄)₂CN–CHC(SⁱPr)₂] 6. Treatment of 4a with the sodium salt of piperidine leads to [Ph₂CN–CHC(NC₅H₁₀)₂] 10. The coordination of 6 on CuBr affords the macrocyclic dinuclear Cu(I) complex 11. The crystal structures of 5i, 7a,b, 10 and 11 have been determined by X-ray diffraction.     

Insertion of alkynes into the heterocycle of (η-pentaalkyl-2,3-dihydro-1,3-diborolyl)(η-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium: Formation and characterization of 4-borataborepine ruthenium complexes

The violet ruthenium complex [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru(η⁵-C₃B₂Me₄R¹)] (2a, R¹ = Me) reacts with terminal alkynes R²CCH to give yellow 4-borataborepine compounds [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru{η⁷-(MeC)₃(R¹B)₂(R²C₂H)}] (4c, R¹ = Me, R² = Ph; 4d, R¹ = Me, R² = SiMe₃; 4e, R¹ = Me, R² = H). The insertion of alkynes into the folded C₃B₂ heterocycle of 2a causes some steric hindrance, which yields with elimination of the distant boranediyl group the corresponding boratabenzene complexes 5 as byproducts. The analogous reactions with internal alkynes R²CCR² proceed slowly and afford predominantly the boratabenzene complexes [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru{η⁶-(MeC)₃(MeB)(R²C)₂}] (5f, R² = Et, 5g, R² = p-tolyl), respectively. In the latter case, three byproducts are formed: methylboronic acid and 1,2,3,4-tetra-p-tolyl-1,3-butadiene (9) due to hydrolysis of the postulated 2,3,4,5-tetra-p-tolyl-1-methylborole (10) and unexpectedly, the cationic triple-decker complex [{(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ru}₂{μ,η⁷-(MeC)₃(MeB)₂(CH)₂}]Cl (11) having two separated CH groups. The new compounds were characterized by NMR, MS, and single-crystal X-ray studies of 4c, 5f, 9 and 11.     

Reactions of a hydrido(hydrosilylene)tungsten complex with oxiranes

Reactivity of a hydrido(hydrosilylene)tungsten complex, Cp¹(CO)₂(H)WSi(H)[C(SiMe₃)₃] (1), toward oxiranes was investigated. Treatment of 1 with racemic mono-substituted oxiranes with a substituent R (R = Ph, vinyl, ^tBu, or ⁿBu) at room temperature produced dihydrido(vinyloxysilyl)tungsten complexes, (E)- and/or (Z)-Cp¹(CO)₂(H)₂W{Si(H)(OCHCHR)[C(SiMe₃)₃]} [(E/Z)-2: R = Ph, (E)-3: R = vinyl, (E)-4: R = ^tBu, (E/Z)-5: R = ⁿBu] in high yields via regioselective ring-opening of oxiranes. When the substituent R on oxirane was relatively large, (E)-isomers (2, 3, and 4) were obtained predominantly (87–97%), while the substituent was a relatively small ⁿBu group, an approximately 1:1 mixture of (E)- and (Z)-isomers [(E/Z)-5] was obtained. Reaction of 1 with 2,2-dimethyloxirane afforded the corresponding complex, Cp¹(CO)₂(H)₂W{Si(H)(OCHCMe₂)[C(SiMe₃)₃]} (6), quantitatively. A reaction mechanism is also discussed.     

Les cations ammoniums chiraux de type [R1R2R3R4N]+, de nouveaux templates pour les réseaux bimétalliques à pont oxalate

Chiral ammonium cations of the type [R¹R²R³R⁴N]⁺, new templates for a new family of bimetallic oxalate bridged networks. This work deals with the obtention of a new family of bimetallic [R¹R²R³R⁴N][MnCr(C₂O₄)₃] oxalate bridged 2D networks templated by chiral ammonium cations of the type [R¹R²R³R⁴N]⁺, in which R stands for n-alkyl groups from methyl to dodecyl. To cite this article: M. Gruselle et al., C. R. Chimie 6 (2003).     

Six-coordinate uranium complexes featuring a bidentate anilide ligand

The synthesis of a new bidentate anilide ligand and four uranium amide complexes utilizing the ligand are reported. The secondary aniline HN[R]Ar_MeL (R = C(CD₃)₂CH₃, Ar_MeL = 2-NMe₂-5-MeC₆H₃) is prepared by condensation of H₂NAr_MeL and acetone-d₆ followed by alkylation of the resulting imine with MeLi. The ligand precursors (Et₂O)Li(N[R]Ar_MeL) and K(N[R]Ar_MeL) are prepared through deprotonation of HN[R]Ar_MeL with n-BuLi and KH, respectively. Treatment of UI₃(THF)₄ with (Et₂O)Li(N[R]Ar_MeL) (2 equiv) provides the uranium(III) -ate complex Li[I₂U(N[R]Ar_MeL)₂] (Li[1]), while treatment of UI₃ with three equiv. of K(N[R]Ar_MeL) provides the neutral uranium(III) complex U(N[R]Ar_MeL)₃ (2). Both uranium(III) complexes are susceptible to 1e oxidation, as is demonstrated by the syntheses of the uranium(IV) derivatives I₂U(N[R]Ar_MeL)₂ (1) and [U(N[R]Ar_MeL)₃][OTf] ([2][OTf]; OTf = CF₃SO₃). The spectroscopic and X-ray structural characterization of all four uranium complexes is described. The structures of 2 and [2][OTf] exhibit a large degree of steric pressure about the uranium center, effectively preventing the [2]⁺ ion from achieving a seven-coordinate structure.     

Synthese und strukturuntersuchungen von zwei stannylwolframpentacarbonylen R2Sn-W(CO)5 (R = (o-dimethylaminomethyl)phenyl bzw. (o-diphenylphosphinomethyl)phenyl)

The compounds [o-C₆-H₄CH₂E]₂Sn-W(CO)₅, (E = NMe₂ (1) or PPh₂ (2)) have been prepared by reaction of o-LiC₆H₄CH₂E with pentacarbonyltungsten tin(II) chloride (CO)₅WSnCl₂. The complexes were characterized by ¹³C, ³¹P, and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy and by X-ray diffraction analyses. 1 crystallizes monoclinically in the space group C/c (no. 15) with a 1310.2(4), b 1552.1(4), c 1202.9(4) pm, β 90.11(4)°, and Z = 4. 2 crystallizes monoclinically in the space goup P2₁/n (no. 14) with a 2108.1(4), b 1707.7(4), c 1283.7(3) pm, β 97.47(2)° and Z = 4. The structures were refined to final R values of 0.029 and 0.039, respectively.The SnW bond distances of 274.9 and 276.2 pm are very similar in both complexes. The Sn atoms are penta-coordinated by 2C, 2N and W in 1 and by 2C, 2P and W in 2. The penta-coordination comprises one SnW and two SnC single bonds, and either a SnN (in 1) or a SnP bond (in 2) of bond order 0.45. In the stannyl group of 1 the SnN bond distances both are identical by symmetry (256.4 pm), whereas the two SnP bond lengths of 2 differ to some extent (283.1 and 301.2 pm).     

Asymmetric nitrogen−35 : Structure and properties of l(s)-α-carboxyethyl-3, 3-bis(trifluoromethyl)diaziridine and its derivatives

A second-kind asymmetric transformation involving N-atom inversion has been observed at 20° for 1(S) - α - carboxyethyl - 3,3 - bis(trifluoromethyl)diaziridine 1 and its methyl ester 2. X-Ray data for the diastereomer (1S, 2S, α-S), 1A (which is thermodynamically preferred in the crystalline phase), ¹H NMR spectra of ethyl ester 3-¹⁵N(1) and 3-¹⁵N(2), CD spectra of 1A,B, 2A,B, potassium salt 4A,B and semiempirical calculations (MINDO/3 and INDO) for 1A, show that the stereospecificity of crystallization of the diastereomer A is due to the higher energy of the crystal lattice of the diastereomer (1R, 2R, α-S), 1B because of hindered charge compensation as well as to the hindrance by the CF₃, groups to intermolecular H-bonds. According to semiempirical calculations, the stability of 3,3 - bis(trifluoromethyl) - diaziridines (TFD) to the action ofel w-orbital energies and depolarization of the C-N bonds due to hyperconjugation and the inductive effect of the CF₃,-groups. The steric effect of these groups is the reason of the low configurational stability of TFD compared with the 3,3-dimethyl analogues.     

Charge density studies on [(NO)Fe(S2C6H4)2][PPN] and [(NO)3Fe(S2C6H4)3] complexes

Charge density studies of chemical bonds for two iron complexes, [(NO)Fe(S,S-C₆H₄)₂] [PPN] (1), where PPN = N(Pph₃)₂ and Fe₃(NO)₃(S,S-C₆H₄)₃ (2) are investigated in terms of the topological properties at bond critical points based on the ‘atoms in molecule’ theory. The one electron reduction form (1R) of complex 1 and the one electron oxidation form (2O) of complex 2 are also included for comparison. The X-ray absorption spectroscopy of Fe K- and L_III,II-edges, as well as the N/S K-edge are applied to verify the illustration in the variation of the electronic structures. Based on the ρ_c, ?²ρ_c, and H_b values among the compound studied, Fe-S/N can be regarded as polarized covalent bond, and Fe-N bonds show stronger covalent character than that of the Fe–S bond, which is believed to be a highly polarized covalent bond.