Four-coordinate Mo(II) as (silox)2Mo(PMe3)2 and its W(IV) congener (silox)2HW(eta2-CH2PMe2)(PMe3) (silox = tBu3SiO)

The reduction of [( (t) Bu 3SiO) 2MoCl] 2 ( 2 2) provided the cyclometalated derivative, (silox) 2HMoMo(kappa-O,C-OSi (t) Bu 2CMe 2CH 2)(silox) ( 3), and alkylation of 2 2 with MeMgBr afforded [( (t) Bu 3SiO) 2MoCH 3] 2 ( 4 2). The hydrogenation of 4 2 was ineffective, but the reduction of 2 2 under H 2 generated [( (t) Bu 3SiO) 2MoH] 2 ( 5 2), and the addition of 2-butyne to 3 gave [(silox) 2Mo] 2(mu:eta (2)eta (2)-C 2Me 2) ( 6), thereby implicating the existence of [(silox) 2Mo] 2 ( 1 2). The addition of (silox)H to Mo(NMe 2) 4 led to (silox) 2Mo(NMe 2) 2 ( 7), but further elaboration of the core proved ineffective. The silanolysis of MoCl 5 afforded (silox) 2MoCl 4 ( 8) and (silox) 3MoCl 3 ( 9) as a mixture from which pure 8 could be isolated, and the addition of THF or PMe 3 resulted in derivatives of 9 as (silox) 2Cl 3MoL (L = THF, 10; PMe 3, 11). Reductions of 11 and (silox) 2WCl 4 ( 15) in the presence of excess PMe 3 provided (silox) 2Cl 2MPMe 3 (M = Mo, 12; W, 16) or (silox) 2HW(eta (2)-CH 2PMe 2)PMe 3 ( 14). While "(silox) 2W(PMe 3) 2" was unstable with respect to W(IV) as 14, a reduction of 12 led to the stable Mo(II) diphosphine, (silox) 2Mo(PMe 3) 2 ( 17). X-ray crystal structures of 10 (pseudo- O h ), 12 (square pyramidal), and 14 and 17 (distorted T d ) are reported. Calculations address the diamagnetism of 12 and 16, and the distortion of 17 and its stability to cyclometalation in contrast to 14.     

Basic metals : XXXIV. Synthesis and reactivity of RuH(η2-CH2PMe2)(PMe3)3

The complex RuH(η²-CH₂PMe₂)(PMe₃)₃ is obtained by reduction of trans-RuCl₂(PMe₃)₄ with Na/Hg in benzene. In contrast to the iron analogue, this complex is configurationally stable on the NMR time scale and does not react with CO or P(OMe)₃ under normal conditions, but it does react with the electrophiles MeI, CS₂ and NH₄PF₆ to form RuI(η²-CH₂PMe₂)(PMe₃)₃, Ru(η³-S₂CHPMe₂CH₂)(PMe₃)₃ and [RuH(PMe₃)₅]PF₆, respectively.     

NiCl2(PMe3)(2)-catalyzed borylation of aryl chlorides

The cross-coupling of aryl chlorides and bis(pinacolato)diboron was achieved using NiCl(2)(PMe(3))(2) catalyst in the presence of metal 2,2,2-trifluoroethoxide. The catalyst smoothly provided the desired products regardless of a variety of functional groups and substituted positions.     

Alternativ-Liganden. XXX [1] Neue Tripod-Liganden XM' (OCH2PMe2)n(CH2CH2PMe2)3−n (M' = Si; Ge; n = 0–3) für Käfigstrukturen

Alternative Ligands. XXX Novel Tripod Ligands XM' (OCH₂PMe₂)_n(CH₂CH₂PMe₂)_3?n (M' = Si, Ge; n = 0–3) for Cage Structures Attempts to prepare new tripod ligands XSi(OCH₂PMe₂)₃ [X = CF₃ ( 15 ), C₆F₅ ( 16 ), NMe₂ ( 17 ), Cl ( 18 ), F ( 19 ), H ( 20 ), OEt ( 21 ), OMe ( 22 )] prove to be unsuccessful in spite of using different pathways, because the groups X undergo following reactions giving insoluble solids (polyadducts) or form inseparable mixtures, e. g. (RO)_nSi(OCH₂PMe₂)_4?n (R = Me, Et). In many cases Si(OCH₂PMe₂)₄ ( 13 ) can be isolated from the reaction mixture. The syntheses of the ligands XSi(CH₂CH₂PMe₂)₃ [X = NMe₂ ( 6 ), Cl ( 7 ), F ( 8 ), OMe ( 9 ), Vi ( 12 )], Si(OCH₂PMe₂)₄ ( 13 ) und Me₃GeOCH₂PMe₂ ( 14 ) are successful. The compounds MeSi(OCH₂PMe₂)₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂ ( 10 ) and MeSi(OCH₂PMe₂)₂CH₂CH₂P(CF₃)₂ ( 11 ) with different donor groups are obtained in good yields. The preparative program includes the synthesis of the known representatives MeSi(OCH₂PMe₃)₃ ( 1 ), MeSi(OCH₂PMe₂)₂CH₂CH₂PMe₂ ( 2 ), MeSi(OCH₂PMe₂)(CH₂CH₂PMe₂)₂ ( 3 ), MeSi(CH₂CH₂PMe₂)₃ ( 4 ) and MeGe(OCH₂PMe₂)₃ ( 5 ). Important preparative steps are the substitution of M'Cl (M' = Si, Ge) by Me₂PCH₂O groups and the photochemically induced or base catalyzed addition of HNMe₂, HPMe₂ or HP(CF₃)₂ to SiVi functions. The novel compounds are characterized by analytical and spectroscopic (IR, NMR, MS) investigations.     

Synthesis and characterization ofM 2(CCR)4(PMe3)4 dimetallapolyynes

The reaction betweenM ₂Cl₄(PMe₃)₄ (M = Mo, W) and four equivalents of LiCCR (R = Me,i-Pr,t-Bu, SiMe₃, Ph) in dimethoxyethane solution yields alkynyl-substituted, quadruply bonded complexes of the type M₂(CCR )₄(PMe₃)₄ in 10–90% yield. The electronic-absorption and¹H-,¹³ ₁₃C-, and³¹P-NMR spectroscopic data for these dimetallapolyyne complexes indicate that they are uncontaminated by chloride-containing impurities, and that they possess theD _2d geometry expected of compounds of the M₂X₄L₄ type. A single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of Mo₂(CCPr ⁱ )₄(PMe₃)₄ confirms this latter conclusion, and also reveals that the Mo₂ core of the complex is three-way disordered within the ordered quasi-cubic array of ligating atoms.     

Transition‐Metal Complexes [(PMe3)2Cl2M(E)] and [(PMe3)2(CO)2M(E)] with Naked Group 14 Atoms (E=C–Sn) as Ligands; Part 1: Parent Compounds

The equilibrium geometries and bond dissociation energies of 16‐valence‐electron(VE) complexes [(PMe₃)₂Cl₂M(E)] and 18‐VE complexes [(PMe₃)₂(CO)₂M(E)] with M=Fe, Ru, Os and E=C, Si, Ge, Sn were calculated by using density functional theory at the BP86/TZ2P level. The nature of the M? E bond was analyzed with the NBO charge decomposition analysis and the EDA energy‐decomposition analysis. The theoretical results predict that the heavier Group 14 complexes [(PMe₃)₂Cl₂M(E)] and [(PMe₃)₂(CO)₂M(E)] with E=Si, Ge, Sn have C_2v equilibrium geometries in which the PMe₃ ligands are in the axial positions. The complexes have strong M? E bonds which are slightly stronger in the 16‐VE species 1ME than in the 18‐VE complexes 2ME . The calculated bond dissociation energies show that the M? E bonds become weaker in both series in the order C>Si>Ge>Sn; the bond strength increases in the order Fe<Ru<Os for 1ME , whereas a U‐shaped trend Ru<Os<Fe is found for 2ME . The M? E bonding analysis suggests that the 16‐VE complexes 1ME have two electron‐sharing bonds with σ and π symmetry and one donor–acceptor π bond like the carbon complex. Thus, the bonding situation is intermediate between a typical Fischer complex and a Schrock complex. In contrast, the 18‐VE complexes 2ME have donor–acceptor bonds, as suggested by the Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson model, with one M←E σ donor bond and two M→E π‐acceptor bonds, which are not degenerate. The shape of the frontier orbitals reveals that the HOMO?2 σ MO and the LUMO and LUMO+1 π* MOs of 1ME are very similar to the frontier orbitals of CO.     

Transition‐Metal Complexes [(PMe3)2Cl2M(E)] and [(PMe3)2(CO)2M(E)] with Naked Group 14 Atoms (E=C–Sn) as Ligands; Part 2: Complexation with W(CO)5

Density functional calculations at the BP86/TZ2P level were carried out to understand the ligand properties of the 16‐valence‐electron(VE) Group 14 complexes [(PMe₃)₂Cl₂M(E)] ( 1ME ) and the 18‐VE Group 14 complexes [(PMe₃)₂(CO)₂M(E)] ( 2ME ; M=Fe, Ru, Os; E=C, Si, Ge, Sn) in complexation with W(CO)₅. Calculations were also carried out for the complexes (CO)₅W–EO. The complexes [(PMe₃)₂Cl₂M(E)] and [(PMe₃)₂(CO)₂M(E)] bind strongly to W(CO)₅ yielding the adducts 1ME–W(CO)₅ and 2ME–W(CO)₅ , which have C_2v equilibrium geometries. The bond strengths of the heavier Group 14 ligands 1ME (E=Si–Sn) are uniformly larger, by about 6–7 kcal mol^?1, than those of the respective EO ligand in (CO)₅W‐EO, while the carbon complexes 1MC–W(CO)₅ have comparable bond dissociation energies (BDE) to CO. The heavier 18‐VE ligands 2ME (E=Si–Sn) are about 23–25 kcal mol^?1 more strongly bonded than the associated EO ligand, while the BDE of 2MC is about 17–21 kcal mol^?1 larger than that of CO. Analysis of the bonding with an energy‐decomposition scheme reveals that 1ME is isolobal with EO and that the nature of the bonding in 1ME–W(CO)₅ is very similar to that in (CO)₅W–EO. The ligands 1ME are slightly weaker π acceptors than EO while the π‐acceptor strength of 2ME is even lower.     

Preparation,characterization and reactivity of Cp2M(PMe3)2 complexes (M = Ti,Zr): the molecular structure of Cp2Zr(PMe3)2

The reduction of Cp₂MCl₂ (M = Ti, Zr) with magnesium in THF in the presence of PMe₃ affords the complexes Cp₂M(PMe₃)₂ in high yields. These compounds lose one or both PMe₃ ligands under very mild conditions. Cp₂Ti(PMe₃)₂ reacts readily with CH₃I, CH₃C(O)Cl, PhSSPh, Me₂PCH₂CH₂PMe₂, CO, RCN (R = Me, t-Bu) or (RN)₂S (R = t-Bu, Me₃Si) to give the corresponding titanocene products. The structure of Cp₂Zr(PMe₃)₂ has been determined by X-ray diffraction; the structural parameters are similar to those of the titanium analog Cp₂Ti(PMe₃)₂ except that the Zr-P and Zr-C distances are longer.     

The Crystal Structures of Trimethylphosphane supported Nickel‐ and Cobalt‐Methyl Complexes: Octahedral mer‐cis‐[CoIIII(CH3)2(PMe3)3] and Square Planar trans‐[NiIICl(CH3)(PMe3)2]

Single crystals of octahedral mer‐cis‐[Co^IIII(CH₃)₂(PMe₃)₃] ( 1 ) and square planar trans‐[Ni^IICl(CH₃)(PMe₃)₂] ( 2 ), were obtained from solvent mixtures (methylcylohexane / pentane 1:1) and have been analyzed by X‐ray crystallography for the first time.     

Darstellung und spektroskopische Untersuchungen von M(CO)4L2- und M(CO)3L3-Komplexen (M = Cr,Mo, W; L = Me3SiOCH2PMe2, Me2(CH2CH) SiOCH2PMe2)

Preparation and spectroscopical Investigations of M(CO)₄L₂ and M(CO)₃L₃ Complexes (M = Cr, Mo, W; L = Me₃SiOCH₂PMe₂, Me₂(CH₂?CH)SiOCH₂PMe₂ The coordinating properties of the ligands L¹ (?Me₃SiOCH₂PMe₂) and L² (?Me₂ViSiOCH₂PMe₂)¹) have been studied by synthesis and spectroscopic investigations (IR, NMR, MS) of their complexes M(CO)₄L₂ and M(CO)₃L₃(M = Cr, Mo, W). The complexes are obtained by replacement of norbornadiene (NBD) in M(CO)₄NBD or cycloheptatriene CHT in M(CO)₃CHT. Spectroscopic data (v(CO), δ δ) support the σ-donor/-π-acceptor model of the MP bonds.