Reactions of RSe− (R = Me,Ph) Groups in [RSeFe(CO)4I and [RSeCr(CO)5−]

The anionic [MeSeFe(CO)₄] and [MeSeCr(CO)₅] complexes were synthesized by reaction of [PPN][HFe(CO)₄] and [PPN][HCr(CO)₅] with MeSeSeMe respectively via nucleophilic cleavage of the Se-Se bond. The ease of cleavage of the Se-Se bond follows the nucleophilic strength of metal-hydride complexes. Methylation of [RSeCr(CO)₅^?] by the soft alkylating agent MeI resulted in the formation of neutral (MeSeMe)Cr(CO)₅ in THF at 0°C. In contrast, the [ICr(CO)₅^?] was isolated at ambient temperature. Reaction of [MeSeFe(CO)₄^?] or [MeSeCr(CO)₅^?] with HBF₄ yielded (CO)₃Fc(μ-SeMe)₂Fe(CO)₃ dimer and anionic [(CO )₅Cr (μ-SeMe)Cr(CO)₅^?] respectively, and no neutral (HSeMe)Fe(CO)₄ and (HSeMe)Cr(CO)₅ were detected spectrally (IR) even at low temperature. Reaction of NOBF₄ or [Ph₃C][BF₄] and [MeSeCr(CO)₅^?] resulted in the neutral monodentate (MeSeSeMe)Cr(CO)₅ complex. Addition of 1 equiv CpFe(CO)₂I to 2 equiv [MeSeCr(CO)₅^?] gave CpFe(CO)₂(SeMe) and the anionic [(CO)₅Cr(μ-SeMe)Cr(CO)₅^?] in THF at ambient temperature.     

Oxidative Addition of Diphenyl Disulfide/Thiophenol to [Mn(CO)5]−: Crystal Structure of cis-[Mn(CO)4(SPh)2]−

Oxidative addition of diphenyl disulfide to the coordinatively unsaturated [Mn(CO)₅]^? led to the formation of low-spin, six-coordinate cis-[Mn(CO)₄(SPh)₂]^?. The complex cis-[PPN][Mn(CO)₄(SPh)₂] crystallized in monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 9.965(2) Å, b = 24.604(5) Å, c = 19.291(4) Å, β = 100.05(2)°, V = 4657(2)ų, and Z = 4; final R = 0.036 and R_w = 0.039. Thermal transformation of cis-[Mn(CO)₄(SPh)₂]^? to [(CO)₃Mn(μ-SPh)₃Mn(CO)₃]^? was completed overnight in THF at room temperature. Additionally, reaction of [Mn(CO)₅]^? and PhSH in 1:2 mole ratio also led to cis-[PPN](Mn(CO)₄(SPh)₂]. Presumably, oxidative addition of PhSH to [Mn(CO)₄]^? was followed by a Lewis acid-base reaction to form cis-[Mn(CO)₄(SPh)₂]^? with evolution of H₂.     

The pentacoordinated [Cr(CO)5]2− dianion in [2,2,2‐crypt‐K]2[Cr(CO)5] ethylenediamine monosolvate

Bis[(4,7,13,16,21,24‐hexaoxa‐1,10‐diazabicyclo[8.8.8]hexacosane)potassium(+)] pentacarbonylchromate(2−) ethylenediamine monosolvate, [K(C₁₈H₃₆N₂O₆)]₂[Cr(CO)₅]·C₂H₈N₂, was obtained from the reaction between K₃Cd₂Sb₂ and Cr(CO)₆ in ethylenediamine in the presence of the macrocyclic 2,2,2‐crypt ligand. The structure provides the first crystallographic characterization of the pentacoordinated [Cr(CO)₅]²⁻ dianion. The central Cr^III atom is coordinated by five carbonyl ligands in a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal geometry. The distribution of the Cr—C bond lengths indicates a greater degree of back bonding from Cr^III to the equatorial carbonyl ligands compared with the axial carbonyl ligands.     

Reaktionen des [η2-{P–PtBu2}Pt(PPh3)2] und [η2-{P–PtBu2}Pt(dppe)] mit Metallcarbonylen. Bildung von [η2-{(CO)5M · PPtBu2}Pt(PPh3)2] (M = Cr,W) und [η2-{(CO)5Cr · PPtBu2}Pt(dppe)]

Coordination Chemistry of P-rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVI [1] Reactions of [g²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] and [g²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] with Metal Carbonyls. Formation of [g²-{(CO)₅M · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] (M = Cr, W) and [g²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] [η²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 4 reacts with M(CO)₅ · THF (M = Cr, W) by adding the M(CO)₅ group to the phosphinophosphinidene ligand yielding [η²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 1 , or [η²-{(CO)₅W · PP^tBu₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 2 , respectively. Similarly, [η²-{P–P^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] 5 yields [η²-{(CO)₅Cr · PP^tBu₂}Pt(dppe)] 3 . Compounds 1 , 2 and 3 are characterized by their ¹H- and ³¹P-NMR spectra, for 2 and 3 also crystal structure determinations were performed. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n (no. 14) with a = 1422.7(1) pm, b = 1509.3(1) pm, c = 2262.4(2) pm, β = 103.669(9)°. 3 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (no. 2) with a = 1064.55(9) pm, b = 1149.9(1) pm, c = 1693.2(1) pm, α = 88.020(8)°, β = 72.524(7)°, γ = 85.850(8)°.     

The [CH5NO]+ ˙ potential energy surface: Distonic ions,lon-dipole complexes and hydrogen-bridged radical cations

By combining results from a variety of mass spectrometric techniques (metastable ion, collisional activation, collision-induced dissociative ionization, neutralization-reionization spectrometry, ²H, ¹³C and ¹⁸O isotopic labelling and appearance energy measurements) and high-level ab initio molecular orbital calculations, the potential energy surface of the [CH₅NO]^{+ ˙} system has been explored. The calculations show that at least nine stable isomers exist. These include the conventional species [CH₃ONH₂]^{+ ˙} and [HO? CH₂? NH₂]^{+ ˙}, the distonic ions [O? CH₂? NH₃]^{+ ˙}, [O? NH₂? CH₃]^{+ ˙}, [CH₂? O(H)? NH₂]^{+ ˙}, [HO? NH₂? CH₂]^{+ ˙}, and the ion-dipole complex CH₂?NH₂⁺ …? OH˙. Surprisingly the distonic ion [CH₂? O? NH₃]^{+ ˙} was found not to be a stable species but to dissociate spontaneously to CH₂?O + NH₃^{+ ˙}. The most stable isomer is the hydrogen-bridged radical cation [H? C?O …? H …? NH₃]^{+ ˙} which is best viewed as an immonium cation interacting with the formyl dipole. The related species [CH₂?O …? H …? NH₂]^{+ ˙}, in which an ammonium radical cation interacts with the formaldehyde dipole is also a very stable ion. It is generated by loss of CO from ionized methyl carbamate, H₂N? C(?O)? OCH₃ and the proposed mechanism involves a 1,4-H shift followed by intramolecular ‘dictation’ and CO extrusion. The [CH₂?O …? H …? NH₂]^{+ ˙} product ions fragment exothermically, but via a barrier, to NH₄^{+ ˙} HCO^…? and to H₃N? C(H)?O^{+ ˙} H˙. Metastable ions [CH₃ONH₂]^+…? dissociate, via a large barrier, to CH₂?O + NH₃⁺ + and to [CH₂NH₂]⁺ + OH˙ but not to CH₂?O^{+ ˙} + NH₃. The former reaction proceeds via a 1,3-H shift after which dissociation takes place immediately. Loss of OH˙ proceeds formally via a 1,2-CH₃ shift to produce excited [O? NH₂? CH₃]^{+ ˙}, which rearranges to excited [HO? NH₂? CH₂]^{+ ˙} via a 1,3-H shift after which dissociation follows.     

Functionalization of [Ge9] with Small Silanes:[Ge9(SiR3)3]– (R = iBu,iPr, Et) and the Structures of (CuNHCDipp)[Ge9{Si(iBu)3}3], (K‐18c6)Au[Ge9{Si(iBu)3}3]2, and (K‐18c6)2[Ge9{Si(iBu)3}2]

Novel silylation reactions at [Ge₉] Zintl clusters starting from the chlorosilanes SiR₃Cl (R = iBu, iPr, Et) and the Zintl phase K₄Ge₉ are reported. The formation of the tris‐silylated anions [Ge₉(SiR₃)₃]^– [R = iBu ( 1a ), iPr ( 1b ), Et ( 1c )] by heterogeneous reactions in acetonitrile was monitored by ESI‐MS measurements. For R = iBu ¹H, ¹³C and ²⁹Si NMR experiments confirmed the exclusive formation of 1a . Subsequent reactions of 1a with CuNHC^DippCl and Au(PPh₃)Cl result in formation of the neutral metal complex (CuNHC^Dipp)[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₃]·0.5 tol ( 2 ·0.5 tol) and the metal bridged dimeric unit {Au[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₃]₂}^– ( 3a ), isolated as a (K‐18c6)⁺ salt in (K‐18c6)Au[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₃]₂·tol ( 3 ·tol), respectively. Finally, from a toluene/hexane solution of 1a in presence of 18‐crown‐6, crystals of the compound (K‐18c6)₂[Ge₉{Si(iBu)₃}₂]·tol ( 4 ·tol), containing the bis‐silylated cluster anion [Ge₉(Si(iBu)₃)₂]^2– ( 4a ), were obtained. The compounds 2 ·0.5 tol, 3 ·tol and 4 ·tol were characterized by single‐crystal structure determination.     

Protonation and Hydrogen Atom Abstraction Reactions in the Synthesis of the [HP7M(CO)3]2– Ions (M = Cr,W)

Ethylenediamine (en) solutions of [P₇M(CO)₃]^3– (M = Cr, W) react with weak acids to give [HP₇M(CO)₃]^2– ions where M = Cr ( 4 a ) and W ( 4 b ) in high yields. Competition studies with known acids revealed a pK_a range for 4 b in DMSO of 17.9 to 22.6. The [P₇M(CO)₃]^3– complexes also react with one-half equivalent of I₂ to give 4 through an oxidation/hydrogen atom abstraction process. Labeling studies show that the abstracted hydrogen originates from the [K(2,2,2-crypt)]⁺ ions or from the solvent (DMSO-d₆) in the absence of [K(2,2,2-crypt)]⁺ or other good hydrogen atom donors. In the solid state, the ions have no crystallographic symmetry but in solution they show virtual C_s symmetry (³¹P NMR spectroscopy) due to an intramolecular wagging process. Crystallographic data for [K(2,2,2-crypt)]₂[HP₇W(CO)₃]: triclinic, P 1, a = 10.9709(8) Å, b = 13.9116(10) Å, c = 19.6400(14) Å, α = 92.435(6)°, β = 93.856(6)°, γ = 108.413(6)°, V = 2831.2(4) ų, Z = 2, R(F) = 7.65%, R(wF²) = 14.17% for all 7400 reflections. For [K(2,2,2-crypt)]₂[HP₇Cr(CO)₃]: triclinic, P 1, a = 12.000(3) Å, b = 14.795(3) Å, c = 17.421(4) Å, α = 93.01(2)°, β = 93.79(2)°, γ = 110.72(2)°, V = 2877(2) ų, Z = 2.     

Structures and stabilities of [C3H2]+ ˙ and [C3H2]2+ ions

Ab initio molecular orbital theory using basis sets up to 6-311G^{* *}, with electron correlation incorporated via configuration interaction calculations with single and double substitutions, has been used to study the structures and energies of the C₃H₂ monocation and dication. In agreement with recent experimental observations, we find evidence for stable cyclic and linear isomers of [C₃H₂]^{+ ˙}. The cyclic structure (, a) represents the global minimum on the [C₃H₂]^{+ ˙} potential energy surface. The linear isomer (, b) lies somewhat higher in energy, 53 kJ mol^?1 above a. The calculated heat of formation for [HCCCH]^{+ ˙} (1369 kJ mol^?1) is in good agreement with a recent experimental value (1377 kJ mol^?1). For the [C₃H₂]²⁺ dication, the lowest energy isomer corresponds to the linear [HCCCH]²⁺ singlet (h). Other singlet and triplet isomers are found not to be competitive in energy. The [HCCCH]²⁺ dication (h) is calculated to be thermodynamically stable with respect to deprotonation and with respect to C? C cleavage into CCH⁺ + CH⁺. The predicted stability is consistent with the frequent observation of [C₃H₂]²⁺ in mass spectrometric experiments. Comparison of our calculated ionization energies for the process [C₃H₂]^{+ ˙} → [C₃H₂]²⁺ with the Q_min values derived from charge-stripping experiments suggests that the ionization is accompanied by a significant change in structure.     

Co‐Adsorption of O2 and CO on Au2−: Infrared Photodissociation Spectroscopy and Theoretical Study of [Au2O2(CO)n]− (n=2–6)

The co‐adsorption of O₂ and CO on anionic sites of gold species is considered as a crucial step in the catalytic CO oxidation on gold catalysts. In this regard, the [Au₂O₂(CO)_n]^? (n=2–6) complexes were prepared by using a laser vaporization supersonic ion source and were studied by using infrared photodissociation spectroscopy in the gas phase. All the [Au₂O₂(CO)_n]^? (n=2–6) complexes were characterized to have a core structure involving one CO and one O₂ molecule co‐adsorbed on Au₂^? with the other CO molecules physically tagged around. The CO stretching frequency of the [Au₂O₂(CO)]^? core ion is observed around =2032–2042 cm^?1, which is about 200 cm^?1 higher than that in [Au₂(CO)₂]^?. This frequency difference and the analyses based on density functional calculations provide direct evidence for the synergy effect of the chemically adsorbed O₂ and CO. The low lying structures with carbonate group were not observed experimentally because of high formation barriers. The structures and the stability (i.e., the inertness in a sense) of the co‐adsorbed O₂ and CO on Au₂^? may have relevance to the elementary reaction steps on real gold catalysts.     

Studies on the Reactivity of [Ge9]4− towards [Fe(cot)(CO)3]: Synthesis and Characterization of [Ge8Fe(CO)3]3− and of the Anionic Organometallic Species [Fe(cot)(CO)3]−

Reaction of cyclooctatetraene (COT) iron(II) tricarbonyl, [Fe(cot)(CO)₃], with one equivalent of K₄Ge₉ in ethylenediamine (en) yielded the cluster anion [Ge₈Fe(CO)₃]^3? which was crystallographically‐characterized as a [K(2,2,2‐crypt)]⁺ salt in [K(2,2,2‐crypt)]₃[Ge₈Fe(CO)₃]. The chemically‐reduced organometallic species [Fe(η³‐C₈H₈)(CO)₃]^? was also isolated as a side‐product from this reaction as [K(2,2,2‐crypt)][Fe(η³‐C₈H₈)(CO)₃]. Both species were further characterized by EPR and IR spectroscopy and electrospray mass spectrometry. The [Ge₈Fe(CO)₃]^3? cluster anion represents an unprecedented functionalized germanium Zintl anion in which the nine‐atom precursor cluster has lost a vertex, which has been replaced by a transition‐metal moiety.     

Komplexe mit Antimon‐Liganden: [tBu2(Cl)SbW(CO)5], [tBu2(OH)SbW(CO)5], O[SbPh2W(CO)5]2, E[SbMe2W(CO)5]2 (E = Se,Te), cis‐[(Me2SbSeSbMe2)2Cr(CO)4]

Complexes Containing Antimony Ligands: [^tBu₂(Cl)SbW(CO)₅], [^tBu₂(OH)SbW(CO)₅], O[SbPh₂W(CO)₅]₂, E[SbMe₂W(CO)₅]₂ (E = Se, Te), cis‐[(Me₂SbSeSbMe₂)₂Cr(CO)₄] Syntheses of [^tBu₂(Cl)SbW(CO)₅] ( 1 ), [^tBu₂(OH)SbW(CO)₅] ( 2 ), O[SbPh₂W(CO)₅]₂ ( 3 ), Se[SbMe₂W(CO)₅]₂ ( 4 ), cis‐[(Me₂SbSeSbMe₂)₂Cr(CO)₄] ( 5 ) Te[SbMe₂W(CO)₅]₂ ( 6 ) and crystal structures of 1 – 5 are reported.     

Effect of External Pressure on the Excitation Energy Transfer from [Cr(ox)3]3− to [Cr(bpy)3]3+ in [Rh1−xCrx(bpy)3][NaM1−yCry(ox)3]ClO4

Resonant excitation energy transfer from [Cr(ox)₃]^3? to [Cr(bpy)₃]³⁺ in the doped 3D oxalate networks [Rh_1?xCr_x(bpy)₃][NaM^III_1?yCr_y(ox)₃]ClO₄ (ox=C₂O₄^?, bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, M=Al, Rh) is due to two types of interaction, namely super exchange coupling and electric dipole–dipole interaction. The energy transfer probability for both mechanisms is proportional to the spectral overlap of the ²E→⁴A₂ emission of the [Cr(ox)₃]^3? donor and the ⁴A₂→²T₁ absorption of the [Cr(bpy)₃]³⁺ acceptor. The spin‐flip transitions of (pseudo‐)octahedral Cr³⁺ are known to shift to lower energy with increasing pressure. Because the shift rates of the two transitions in question differ, the spectral overlap between the donor emission and the acceptor absorption is a function of applied pressure. For [Rh_1?xCr_x(bpy)₃][NaM_1?yCr_y(ox)₃]ClO₄ the spectral overlap is thus substantially reduced on increasing pressure from 0 to 2.5 GPa. As a result, the energy transfer probability decreases with increasing pressure as evidenced by a decrease in the relative emission intensity from the [Cr(bpy)₃]³⁺ acceptor.     

Syntheses and Characterization of Manganese-Tellurolate Complexes by Using Chelating Metalloligand cis-[Mn(Co)4(TePh)2]− and Potential Electrophilic TeMe+ Reagent

The cis-[Mn(CO)₄(TePh)₂]^?, similar to bidentate ligand PhTe(CH₂)₃TePh, acts as a “chelating metalloligand” for the synthesis of metallic tellurolate compounds. The reaction of cis[Mn(CO)₄(TePh)₂]^? with BrMn(CO)₅ in THF leads to a mixture of products[(CO)₃,BrMn(μ-TePh)₂Mn(CO)₄]^? (1) and Mn₂(μ-TePh)₂(CO)_g (2). Complex 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group Pl? with a = 11.309(3) Å, b = 14.780(5) Å, c = 19.212(6) Å, a = 76.05(3)° β = 72.31(3)°, γ = 70.41(3)° V = 2848(2) Å₃, Z = 2. Final R = 0.034 and R_w = 0.035 resulting from refinement of 10021 total reflections with 677 parameters, Dropwise addition of (MeTe)₂ to a solution of [Me₃O][BF₄] in CH₃CN leads to formation of [Me₂TeTeMe][BF₄], a potential MeTe⁺ donor ligand. In contrast to oxidative addition of diphenyl ditelluride to [Mn(CO)s]^? to give cis-[Mn(CO)₄(TePh)₂]^? which was thermally transformed into [(CO)₃Mn(μ-TePh)₃Mn(CO)₃]^?, reaction of [Mn(CO)₅]^?with [Me₂TeTeMe]⁺ proceeded to give the monomeric species MeTeMn(CO)₅ as initial product which was then dimerized into Mn₂(μ-TeMe)₂(CO)_g (4).     

Synthesis,Reactivity, and Fluxional Behaviour of [Ir2Rh2(CO)12], and Crystal Structure of [Ir2Rh2(CO)8(norbornadiene)2]

The synthesis of [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₁₂] ( 1 ) by the literature method gives a mixture 1 /[IrRh₃(CO)₁₂] which cannot be separated using chromatography. The reaction of [Ir(CO)₄]^? with 1 mol-equiv. of [Rh(CO)₂(THF)₂]⁺ in THF gives pure 1 in 61% yield. Crystals of 1 are highly disordered, unlike those of its derivative [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₅(μ₂-CO)₃(norbornadiene)₂] which were analysed using X-ray diffraction. The ground-state geometry of 1 in solution has three edge-bridging CO's on the basal IrRh₂ face of the metal tetrahedron. Time averaging of CO's takes place above 230 K. The CO site exchange of lowest activation energy is due to one synchronous change of basal face, as shown by 2D- and VT-¹³C-NMR. Substitution of CO by X^? in 1 takes place at a Rh-atom giving [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₈(μ₂-CO)₃X]^? (X = Br, I). Substitution by bidentate ligands gives [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₇(μ₂-CO)₃(η⁴-L)] (L = norbornadiene, cycloocta-1,5-diene) where the ligand L is chelating a Rh-atom of the basal IrRh₂ face. Carbonyl substitution by tridentate ligands gives [Ir₂Rh₂(CO)₆(μ₂-CO)₃(μ₃-L)] (L = 1,3,5-trithiane, tripod) with L capping the triangular basal face of the metal tetrahedron. Carbonyl scrambling is also observed in these substituted derivatives of 1 and is mainly due to the rotation of three terminal CO's about a local C₃ axis on the apical Ir-atom.     

Komplexchemie P-reicher Phosphane und Silylphosphane. XI [1]. Bildung,Reaktionen und Strukturen von Chromcarbonylkomplexen aus Reaktionen von Li(THF)2[η2-(tBu2P)2P] mit Cr(CO)5 · THF und Cr(CO)4 · NBD

Transition Metal Complexes of P-rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XI. Formation, Reactions, and Structures of Chromium Carbonyl Complexes from Reactions of Li(THF)₂[η₂-(^tBu₂P)₂P] with Cr(CO)₅ · THF and Cr(CO)₄ · NBD Reactions of Li(THF)₂[η²-(^tBu₂P)₂P] 1 with Cr(CO)₅ · THF yield Li(THF)₂Et₂O[Cr(CO)₄{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂P}η¹-Cr(CO)₅] 2 and the compounds [Cr(CO)₄{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂PH}] 3 , [Cr(CO)₅{η¹-(^tBu₂P)₂PH}] 4 , (^tBu₂P)₂PH 5 and ^tBu₂PH · Cr(CO)₅ 6 . The formation of 3, 4, 5 and 6 is due to byproducts coming from the synthesis of 1. 2 reacts with CH₃COOH under formation of 3 . After addition of 12-crown-4 1 with NBD · Cr(CO)₄ in THF forms Li(12-crown-4)₂[Cr(CO)₄-{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂P}] 7 (yellow crystals). 7 reacts with CH₃COOH to 3 – which regenerates 7 with LiBu – with Cr(CO)₅THF to compound 2 , with NBD · Cr(CO)₄ in THF to 2 and 3 (ratio 1 : 1). With EtBr, 7 forms [Cr(CO)₄{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂PEt}] 8 , and [Cr(CO)₄{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂PBr}] 9 with BrCH₂? CH₂Br. The compounds were characterized by means of ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, ⁷Li NMR spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, elementary analysis, mass spectra, and 2, 3 and 4 additionally by means of X-ray diffraction analysis. 2 crystallizes in the space group P1 with 2 formula units in the elementary cell; a = 10.137(9), b = 15.295(12), c = 15.897(14) Å; α = 101.82(7), β = 91.65(7), γ = 98.99(7)°; 3 crystallizes in the space group P2_t/n with 4 molecules in the elementary unit; a = 11.914(6), b = 15.217(10), c = 14.534(10) Å; α = 90, β = 103.56(5), γ = 90°. 4 : space group P1 with 2 molecules in the elementary unit; a = 8.844(4), b = 12.291(6), c = 14.411(7) Å, α = 66.55(2), β = 89.27(2), γ = 71.44(2)°.     

SnCl2 als Brückenligand in [{(CO)5M}2Sn(Cl)2]2− (M = Cr,Mo, W) — Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität

SnCl₂ as a Bridging Ligand in [{(CO)₅M}₂Sn(Cl)₂]^2? (M = Cr, Mo, W) — Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity [{(CO)₅Cr}₂Sn(Cl)₂]^2?, 1 , may be obtained from [(CO)₅Cr]^2? or [(CO)₅CrSnCl₂ · THF] in fair yields. Alternatively, 1 is accessible by the reaction of [Cr₂(CO)₁₀]^2? with SnCl₂. This procedure may be extended to the synthesis of [{(CO)₅M}₂Sn(Cl)₂]^2? (M = Mo, 2 ; M = W, 3 ). The compounds 1–3 are crystallized as their alkalimetal (12-crown-4)₂ or [2,2,2]cryptand salts. X-ray analyses demonstrate bridging SnCl₂-moieties with M? Sn? M-angles close to 130° in each case. The relation of the bonding situation in 1–3 to the ones observed for stannylene or ?inidene”? complexes, respectively, is discussed. The transformation of 1 into the rhombododecahedral (X-ray analysis) Sn? O-cage compound [{(CO)₅CrSn}₆(μ₃-O)₄(μ₃-OH)₄], 4 , demonstrates the reactivity of the dianions 1–3 .     

Formation and Characterization of the Boron Dicarbonyl Complex [B(CO)2]−

We report the synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of the boron dicarbonyl complex [B(CO)₂]^?. The bonding situation is analyzed and compared with the aluminum homologue [Al(CO)₂]^? using state‐of‐the‐art quantum chemical methods.     

Reaktionen von Cyclostibanen (RSb)n [R = (Me3Si)2CH,n = 3; Me3CCH2, n = 4, 5] mit den Übergangsmetallcarbonyl‐Komplexen [W(CO)5(thf)], [CpxMn(CO)2(thf)], [CpxCr(CO)3]2 und [Co2(CO)8]; Cpx = MeC5H4

Reactions of Cyclostibanes, (RSb)_n [R = (Me₃Si)₂CH, n = 3; Me₃CCH₂, n = 4, 5] with the Transition Metal Carbonyl Complexes [W(CO)₅(thf)], [Cp^xMn(CO)₂(thf)], [Cp^xCr(CO)₃]₂, and [Co₂(CO)₈]; Cp^x = MeC₅H₄ (RSb)₃ [R = (Me₃Si)₂CH] reacts with [W(CO)₅(thf)], [Cp^xMn(CO)₂(thf)], or [Co₂(CO)₈] to give [(RSb)₃W(CO)₅] ( 1 ), [RSb{Mn(CO)₂Cp^x}₂] ( 2 ) or [RSbCo(CO)₃]₂ ( 3 ). The reaction of (R′Sb)_n (n = 4, 5; R′ = Me₃CCH₂) with [Cp^xCr(CO)₃]₂ leads to [(R′Sb)₄{Cr(CO)₂Cp^x}₂] ( 4 ); Cp^x = MeC₅H₄, thf = Tetrahydrofuran.     

Enantioselective Synthesis of Planar Chiral [Cr(η6-Arene)(CO)3] complexes via nucleophilic addition/hydride abstraction. Preliminary communication

Non-racemic, planar chiral 1, 2-disubstituted [Cr(η⁶-arene)(CO)₃] complexes were obtained via external chiral ligand-controlled nucleophilic addition of alkyl-, vinyl-, and aryllithium reagents to monosubstituted complexes followed by an endo-hydride abstraction with trityl cation. The reactions with [Cr(CO)₃(η⁶-phenyloxazoline)], [Cr(CO)₃(η⁶-phenylmethaneimine)], and [Cr(CO)₃ (η⁶-phenylmethanenydrazone)] took place with complete ortho-selectivity and a high degree of enantioselectivity (up to 98% ee).     

Salts of HCN‐Cyanide Aggregates: [CN(HCN)2]− and [CN(HCN)3]−

Although pure hydrogen cyanide can spontaneously polymerize or even explode, when initiated by small amounts of bases (e.g. CN^?), the reaction of liquid HCN with [WCC]CN (WCC=weakly coordinating cation=Ph₄P, Ph₃PNPPh₃=PNP) was investigated. Depending on the cation, it was possible to extract salts containing the formal dihydrogen tricyanide [CN(HCN)₂]^? and trihydrogen tetracyanide ions [CN(HCN)₃]^? from liquid HCN when a fast crystallization was carried out at low temperatures. X‐ray structure elucidation revealed hydrogen‐bridged linear [CN(HCN)₂]^? and Y‐shaped [CN(HCN)₃]^? molecular ions in the crystal. Both anions can be considered members of highly labile cyanide‐HCN solvates of the type [CN(HCN)_n]^? (n=1, 2, 3 …) as well as formal polypseudohalide ions.