Synthesis and properties of copolymers of ethylene/carbon monoxide with styrene/carbon monoxide

The terpolymerization of ethylene, styrene, and carbon monoxide was accomplished by two different palladium‐based catalysts: a phosphine‐based ligand system and a nitrogen‐based ligand system. The range of possible compositions and the composition dependence of the properties of the resulting polymers were determined. These polymers were essentially carbon monoxide versions of the ethylene styrene interpolymers recently presented by Dow. A comparison between the two families of polymers is attempted. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 752–757, 2000     

Activation of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide at aluminium surfaces

Dynamic photoelectron spectroscopy has shown that the adsorption of carbon dioxide at aluminium surfaces is followed by a dissociative reaction leading to the formation of a metastable surface carbonate in the temperature range 80-120 K. The carbonate is subsequently reduced (120–475 K) (deoxygenated) to generate two different forms of surface carbon, one carbidic C^δ- (a) and the other less ionic C⁰(a) possibly graphitic. Quantification of the C(ls) and O(ls) spectra enable each of the species O^2-(a), CO₃^2-(a), C^δ-(a) and C⁰ (a) to be distinguished and their surface concentrations calculated over a wide temperature range. The temperature and pressure dependences of CO₂ reduction suggest the participation of a precursor dimer state (CO₂^---CO₂)(a) which then disproportionates. Furthermore studies of the coadsorption of ammonia and carbon dioxide in analogous systems indicate that a discrete and specifically reactive species, O^- (s), is formed during carbonate formation. The results are discussed in the context of recent theoretical studies of FREUND and MESSMER and also comparisons made with metal-CO₂ complexes.The facile surface reduction of CO₂ via a surface carbonate suggested that a possible route to carbon-oxygen bond cleavage in carbon monoxide interaction with an sp-metal surface (aluminium) was a step-wise oxidation to CO₂ leading to surface carbonate which was then readily deoxygenated. Studies of carbon monoxide: dioxygen mixtures (100: I) confirmed that this indeed occurred. A modified ELEY-RIDEAL type mechanism involving a hopping "non-adsorbed" CO molecule and a short-lived surface O^- (s) species is suggested.     

Recombination of carbon monoxide and oxygen atoms

The recombination of carbon monoxide and oxygen atoms was studied in reflected shock waves in H₂:O₂:CO:Ar = 0.1:1:24:75 with 1300 < T₅ 2200 K and 2 < P₅ < 4 atm. Reaction progress was monitored by observations of the carbon monoxide flame spectrum near 435 nm and carbon dioxide thermal emission near 4.2 μm. Data analysis was accomplished with the aid of computer modeling using a 27-reaction mechanism. Computer modeling experiments also showed that these measurements were sensitive primarily to the rate of the reaction CO + O + M = CO₂ + M and only slightly sensitive to the rates of other reactions. The best fit to the data was achieved with a rate constant for this reaction of 7.7 × 10^?35 exp[19 kJ/RT] cm⁶ s for the temperature range of these experiments. Correlation of this result and previous data covering the temperature range 250 < T < 11,000 K confirms that this recombination reaction is governed by a nonadiabatic curve crossing with an activation barrier of about 20 kJ and subsequent deactivation of a singlet CO₂ molecule.     

Quadrupole polarizability and hyperpolarizability of carbon monoxide

Summary We report a study of the electric dipole-quadrupole (A _,,), quadrupole-quadrupole (C _,,), dipole-octopole (E _,) polarizability and the dipole-dipole-quadrupole (B _,,) hyperpolarizability of carbon monoxide. All values are obtained from finite-field self-consistent field (SCF) and fourth-order manybody perturbation theory (MP4) calculations. Our best values for the dipole-octopole polarizability areE _z,zzz=60.19 andE _x,xxx=–38.06e ² a ₀ ⁴ E _h ^–1 . For the dipole-dipole-quadrupole hyperpolarizability we reportB _zz,zz=–296,B _xz,xz=–170,B _xx,zz=88 andB _xx,xx=–178e ³ a ₀ ⁴ E _h ^–2 .