How and Why Does Ni0 Promote Smooth Etheric CO Bond Cleavage and CC Bond Formation? A Theoretical Study

Ni‐catalyzed cross‐coupling between aryl alkyl ethers (ArOR) and Grignard reagents (RMgBr), known since 1979, proceeds under mild conditions in many cases. Although the reaction routes of various synthetic protocols involving transition‐metal‐catalyzed C?O bond activation have been elucidated, the mechanism of this etheric Kumada–Tamao–Curriu reaction remains enigmatic. This is because oxidative addition of inert etheric C?O to Ni⁰ is thermodynamically and kinetically unfavorable, making it hard to explain the observed high reactivity of ether toward Ni catalysts. In this work, we used DFT calculations to identify a plausible reaction pathway by the Ni⁰‐ate complex, which enables smooth C?O bond cleavage and R‐group transfer with reasonable activation barriers; this mechanism also accounts for the ineffectiveness of Pd catalysts. These results throw new light on both C?O activation and cross‐coupling, and should be valuable for further rational development of the methodologies.     

Reaction of Acetals with Various Carbon Nucleophiles under Non‐Acidic Conditions: C?C Bond Formation via a Pyridinium‐Type Salt

Mild substitution reactions of acetals with carbon nucleophiles via the pyridinium‐type salts generated by the treatment of acetals with TESOTf‐2,4,6‐collidine or 2,2′‐bipyridyl have been developed. Various carbon nucleophiles, such as organocuprates, silyl enol ethers, enamines, etc., reacted with the pyridinium‐type salts to give the corresponding substituted products in good yields. The reactions proceeded under very mild conditions (non‐acidic conditions) and thus acid‐sensitive functional groups can be tolerated during the reaction. In addition, only an acetal can form the pyridinium‐type salt and react with nucleophiles in the presence of a ketal. This unusual selectivity is in contrast to general methods conducted under acidic conditions.     

Transition‐metal‐catalyzed aminations and aziridinations of C?H and CC bonds with iminoiodinanes

Catalytic insertion or addition of a metal‐imido/nitrene species, generated from reaction of a transition‐metal catalyst with iminoiodanes, to C? H and C?C bonds offers a convenient and atom economical method for the synthesis of nitrogen‐containing compounds. Following this groundbreaking discovery during the second half of the last century, the field has received an immense amount of attention with a myriad of impressive metal‐mediated methods for the synthesis of amines and aziridines having been developed. This review will cover the significant progress made in improving the efficiency, versatility and stereocontrol of this important reaction. This will include the various iminoiodanes, their in situ formation, and metal catalysts that could be employed and new ligands, both chiral and non‐chiral, which have been designed, as well as the application of this functional group transformation to natural product synthesis and the preparation of bioactive compounds of current therapeutic interest. DOI 10.1002/tcr.201100018     

Direct Synthesis of Titanium Complexes with Chelating cis‐9,10‐Dihydrophenanthrenediamide Ligands through Sequential C?C Bond‐Forming Reactions from o‐Metalated Arylimines

A series of new titanium(IV) complexes with o‐metalated arylimine and/or cis‐9,10‐dihydrophenanthrenediamide ligands, [o‐C₆H₄(CH?NR)TiCl₃] (R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ ( 3 a ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 3 b ), tBu ( 3 c )), [cis‐9,10‐PhenH₂(NR)₂TiCl₂] (PhenH₂=9,10‐dihydrophenanthrene; R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ ( 4 a ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 4 b ), tBu ( 4 c )), [{cis‐9,10‐PhenH₂(NR)₂}{o‐C₆H₄(HC?NR)}TiCl] (R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ ( 5 a ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 5 b ), tBu ( 5 c )), have been synthesised from the reactions of TiCl₄ with o‐C₆H₄(CH?NR)Li (R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃, 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃, tBu). Complexes 4 and 5 were formed unexpectedly from the reactions of TiCl₄ with two or three equivalents of the corresponding o‐C₆H₄(CH?NR)Li followed by sequential intramolecular C? C bond‐forming reductive elimination and oxidative coupling reactions. Attempts to isolate the intermediates, [{o‐C₆H₄(CH?NR)}₂TiCl₂] ( 2 ), were unsuccessful. All complexes were characterised by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, and the molecular structures of 3 a , 4 a – c , 5 a , and 5 c were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

The Mechanism of Stereospecific C?H Oxidation by Fe(Pytacn) Complexes: Bioinspired Non‐Heme Iron Catalysts Containing cis‐Labile Exchangeable Sites

A detailed mechanistic study of the hydroxylation of alkane C? H bonds using H₂O₂ by a family of mononuclear non heme iron catalysts with the formula [Fe^II(CF₃SO₃)₂(L)] is described, in which L is a tetradentate ligand containing a triazacyclononane tripod and a pyridine ring bearing different substituents at the α and γ positions, which tune the electronic or steric properties of the corresponding iron complexes. Two inequivalent cis‐labile exchangeable sites, occupied by triflate ions, complete the octahedral iron coordination sphere. The C? H hydroxylation mediated by this family of complexes takes place with retention of configuration. Oxygen atoms from water are incorporated into hydroxylated products and the extent of this incorporation depends in a systematic manner on the nature of the catalyst, and the substrate. Mechanistic probes and isotopic analyses, in combination with detailed density functional theory (DFT) calculations, provide strong evidence that C? H hydroxylation is performed by highly electrophilic [Fe^V(O)(OH)L] species through a concerted asynchronous mechanism, involving homolytic breakage of the C? H bond, followed by rebound of the hydroxyl ligand. The [Fe^V(O)(OH)L] species can exist in two tautomeric forms, differing in the position of oxo and hydroxide ligands. Isotopic‐labeling analysis shows that the relative reactivities of the two tautomeric forms are sensitively affected by the α substituent of the pyridine, and this reactivity behavior is rationalized by computational methods.     

Nickel Complexes of a Pincer Amidobis(amine) Ligand: Synthesis,Structure, and Activity in Stoichiometric and Catalytic C?C Bond‐Forming Reactions of Alkyl Halides

Get a grip! Ni^II complexes of the new pincer amidobis(amine) ligand are described. The Ni chloride complex catalyzes Kumada–Corriu–Tamao coupling of unactivated alkyl halides with alkyl Grignard reagents, as well as double C–C coupling of CH₂Cl₂ with alkyl Grignard reagents (see schemes).

     

Dioxygen Reactivity of Biomimetic Iron–Catecholate and Iron–o‐Aminophenolate Complexes of a Tris(2‐pyridylthio)methanido Ligand: Aromatic C?C Bond Cleavage of Catecholate versus o‐Iminobenzosemiquinonate Radical Formation

An iron(III)–catecholate complex [L¹Fe^III(DBC)] ( 2 ) and an iron(II)–o‐aminophenolate complex [L¹Fe^II(HAP)] ( 3 ; where L¹=tris(2‐pyridylthio)methanido anion, DBC=dianionic 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylcatecholate, and HAP=monoanionic 4,6‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐aminophenolate) have been synthesised from an iron(II)–acetonitrile complex [L¹Fe^II(CH₃CN)₂](ClO₄) ( 1 ). Complex 2 reacts with dioxygen to oxidatively cleave the aromatic C? C bond of DBC giving rise to selective extradiol cleavage products. Controlled chemical or electrochemical oxidation of 2 , on the other hand, forms an iron(III)–semiquinone radical complex [L¹Fe^III(SQ)](PF₆) ( 2^ox‐PF₆ ; SQ=3,5‐di‐tert‐butylsemiquinonate). The iron(II)–o‐aminophenolate complex ( 3 ) reacts with dioxygen to afford an iron(III)–o‐iminosemiquinonato radical complex [L¹Fe^III(ISQ)](ClO₄) ( 3^ox‐ClO₄ ; ISQ=4,6‐di‐tert‐butyl‐o‐iminobenzosemiquinonato radical) via an iron(III)–o‐amidophenolate intermediate species. Structural characterisations of 1 , 2 , 2^ox and 3^ox reveal the presence of a strong iron? carbon bonding interaction in all the complexes. The bond parameters of 2^ox and 3^ox clearly establish the radical nature of catecholate‐ and o‐aminophenolate‐derived ligand, respectively. The effect of iron? carbon bonding interaction on the dioxygen reactivity of biomimetic iron–catecholate and iron–o‐aminophenolate complexes is discussed.     

Luminescent Pincer Platinum(II) Complexes with Emission Quantum Yields up to Almost Unity: Photophysics,Photoreductive C?C Bond Formation,and Materials Applications

Luminescent pincer‐type Pt^II complexes supported by C‐deprotonated π‐extended tridentate R C^N^N R′ ligands and pentafluorophenylacetylide ligands show emission quantum yields up to almost unity. Femtosecond time‐resolved fluorescence measurements and time‐dependent DFT calculations together reveal the dependence of excited‐state structural distortions of [Pt(R C^N^N R′)(CC‐C₆F₅)] on the positional isomers of the tridentate ligand. Pt complexes [Pt(R‐C^N^N R′)(CC‐Ar)] are efficient photocatalysts for visible‐light‐induced reductive C C bond formation. The [Pt(R‐C^N^N R′)(CC‐C₆F₅)] complexes perform strongly as phosphorescent dopants for green‐ and red‐emitting organic light‐emitting diodes (OLEDs) with external quantum efficiency values over 22.1 %. These complexes are also applied in two‐photon cellular imaging when incorporated into mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs).     

Intramolecular Methylacridan–Methylacridinium Complexes with a Phenanthrene‐4,5‐diyl or Related Skeleton: Geometry–Property Relationships in Isolable C?H Bridged Carbocations

Bridging the gap : Snapshots of 1,6‐H‐shift precursors indicate that a narrower C? H???C⁺ separation (D in the ORTEP diagram) in the title complexes induces faster degenerate rearrangement of 1 ⁺. A contact distance of less than 2.7 Å is necessary to realize the organic three‐center two‐electron bond of [C? H? C]⁺, as indicated by extrapolation of the X‐ray data.

     

Direct C?H Metalation with Chromium(II) and Iron(II): Transition‐Metal Host / Benzenediide Guest Magnetic Inverse‐Crown Complexes

Check M(etal)ate: The chessboard and the figures represent a special reaction in which different low‐polarity metals can metalate arenes directly when they are brought into the right position. In a combination of queen (sodium) and knight (chromium or iron), it is possible for the knight (usually the weaker piece) to make a direct deadly hit on the king (benzene) in this game of elemental chess.

     

Origin of the Correlation of the Rate Constant of Substrate Hydroxylation by Nonheme Iron(IV)–oxo Complexes with the Bond‐Dissociation Energy of the C?H Bond of the Substrate

A series of hydrogen‐abstraction barriers of a nonheme iron(IV)–oxo oxidant mimicking the active species of taurine/α‐ketoglutarate dioxygenase (TauD) are rationalized by using a valence‐bond curve‐crossing diagram (see figure). It is shown that the barriers correlate with the strength of the C? H bond. Furthermore, electronic differences explain the differences between nonheme and heme iron(IV)–oxo hydrogen‐abstraction barriers.