Structurally Defined Potassium‐Mediated Zincation of Pyridine and 4‐R‐Substituted Pyridines (R=Et,iPr, tBu,Ph, and Me2N) by Using Dialkyl–TMP–Zincate Bases

Two potassium–dialkyl–TMP–zincate bases [(pmdeta)K(μ‐Et)(μ‐tmp)Zn(Et)] ( 1 ) (PMDETA=N,N,N′,N′′,N′′‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine, TMP=2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidide), and [(pmdeta)K(μ‐nBu)(μ‐tmp)Zn(nBu)] ( 2 ), have been synthesized by a simple co‐complexation procedure. Treatment of 1 with a series of substituted 4‐R‐pyridines (R=Me₂N, H, Et, iPr, tBu, and Ph) gave 2‐zincated products of the general formula [{2‐Zn(Et)₂‐μ‐4‐R‐C₅H₃N}₂ ? 2{K(pmdeta)}] ( 3 – 8 , respectively) in isolated crystalline yields of 53, 16, 7, 23, 67, and 51 %, respectively; the treatment of 2 with 4‐tBu‐pyridine gave [{2‐Zn(nBu)₂‐μ‐4‐tBu‐C₅H₃N}₂ ? 2{K(pmdeta)}] ( 9 ) in an isolated crystalline yield of 58 %. Single‐crystal X‐ray crystallographic and NMR spectroscopic characterization of 3 – 9 revealed a novel structural motif consisting of a dianionic dihydroanthracene‐like tricyclic ring system with a central diazadicarbadizinca (ZnCN)₂ ring, face‐capped on either side by PMDETA‐wrapped K⁺ cations. All the new metalated pyridine complexes share this dimeric arrangement. As determined by NMR spectroscopic investigations of the reaction filtrates, those solutions producing 3 , 7 , 8 , and 9 appear to be essentially clean reactions, in contrast to those producing 4 , 5 , and 6 , which also contain laterally zincated coproducts. In all of these metalation reactions, the potassium–zincate base acts as an amido transfer agent with a subsequent ligand‐exchange mechanism (amido replacing alkyl) inhibited by the coordinative saturation, and thus, low Lewis acidity of the 4‐coordinate Zn centers in these dimeric molecules. Studies on analogous trialkyl–zincate reagents in the absence and presence of stoichiometric or substoichiometric amounts of TMP(H) established the importance of Zn? N bonds for efficient zincation.     

Iridium Complexes of 2,2′‐Bidipyrrins

The reaction of [{Ir(cod)(μ‐Cl)}₂] and K₂CO₃ or of [{Ir(cod)(μ‐OMe)}₂] alone with the non‐natural tetrapyrrole 2,2′‐bidipyrrin (H₂BDP) yields, depending on the stoichiometry, the mononuclear complex [Ir(cod)(HBDP)] or the homodinuclear complex [{Ir(cod)}₂(BDP)]. Both complexes react readily with carbon monoxide to yield the species [Ir(CO)₂(HBDP)] and [{Ir(CO)₂}₂(BDP)], respectively. The results from NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray diffraction reveal different conformations for the tetrapyrrolic ligand in both complexes. The reaction of [{Ir(coe)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] with H₂BDP proceeds differently and yields the macrocyclic [4e^?,2H⁺]‐oxidized product [IrCl₂(9‐Meic)] (9‐Meic = monoanion of 9‐methyl‐9,10‐isocorrole), which can be addressed as an iridium analog of cobalamin.     

Zur Reaktivität von alkylthioverbrückten 44‐CVE‐triangularen Platinclustern: Umsetzungen mit bidentaten Phosphanliganden

On the Reactivity of Alkylthio Bridged 44 CVE Triangular Platinum Clusters: Reactions with Bidentate Phosphine Ligands The 44 cve (cluster valence electrons) triangular platinum clusters [{Pt(PR₃)}₃(μ‐SMe)₃]Cl (PR₃ = PPh₃, 2a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 2b ; P(n‐Bu)₃, 2c ) were found to react with PPh₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppm) in a degradation reaction yielding dinuclear platinum(I) complexes [{Pt(PR₃)}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl (PR₃ = PPh₃, 3a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 3b ; P(n‐Bu)₃; 3e ) and the platinum(II) complex [Pt(SMe)₂(dppm)] ( 4 ), whereas the addition of PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe) to cluster 2a afforded a mixture of degradation products, among others the complexes [Pt(dppe)₂] and [Pt(dppe)₂]Cl₂. On the other hand, the treatment of cluster 2a with PPh₂CH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppp) ended up in the formation of the cationic complex [{Pt(dppp)}₂(μ‐SMe)₂]Cl₂ ( 5 ). Furthermore, the terminal PPh₃ ligands in complex 3a proved to be subject to substitution by the stronger donating monodentate phosphine ligands PMePh₂ and PMe₂Ph yielding the analogous complexes [{Pt(PR₃)}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl (PR₃ = PMePh₂, 3c ; PMe₂Ph, 3d ). NMR investigations on complexes 3 showed an inverse correlation of Tolmans electronic parameter ν with the coupling constants ¹J(Pt,P) and ¹J(Pt,Pt). All compounds were fully characterized by means of NMR and IR spectroscopy. X‐ray diffraction analyses were performed for the complexes [{Pt{P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃}}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl ( 3b ), [Pt(SMe)₂(dppm)] ( 4 ), and [{Pt(dppp)}₂(μ‐SMe)₂]Cl₂ ( 5 ).     

Cyclometalation of Phenylpyridines by Rhodium(I) via Room‐temperature C–H Bond Activation

A convenient synthesis of cyclometalated complexes [{Rh(μ‐Cl)(C N)₂}₂] [C N = ppy, 2‐phenylpyridinato ( 2 ); C N = ptpy, 2‐(p‐tolyl)pyridinato ( 3 ); 4‐Clppy = 4‐chloro‐2‐phenylpyridinato ( 4 )] at room temperature is described. The compounds were obtained by the oxidative addition reaction of the corresponding 2‐phenylpyridines to [{Rh(μ‐Cl)(coe)₂}₂] ( 1 ) (coe = cis‐cyclooctene) in dichloromethane solution. The rate of the reaction seems to depend on the electronic influence of the substituents on the phenyl rings of the corresponding 2‐phenylpyridines. The analogous iridium complex of 1 reacted markedly only at higher temperatures in suitable solvents under cyclometalation. The molecular structure of the new compound 4 was additionally confirmed by an X‐ray diffraction study.     

Synthesis,Characterization, Catalytic and Antibacterial Activity of Two Series of Dinuclear Ruthenium Sulphoxide Complexes Using 5,5¢‐Methylenebis(pyridine) as Bis‐chelating Bridging Ligand

The reaction of a new heterocyclic bidentate N containing spacer, (ligand) 5,5′‐methylenebis(pyridine) with ruthenium sulphoxide precursors resulted, dinuclear complexes. We herein report three formulations; [{cis,fac‐RuCl₂(so)₃}₂(μ‐mbp)].3so; [{trans,mer‐RuCl₂(so)₃₂}₂(μ‐mbp)].3so and [{trans‐RuCl₄(so)}₂(μ‐mbp)]^2?[X]₂⁺; where so = dimethyl‐sulfoxide/tetramethylenesulfoxide; mbp = 5,5′‐methylenebis(pyridine) and [X]⁺ = [(dmso)₂H]⁺, Na⁺ or [(tmso)H]⁺. These complexes were characterized on the basis of elemental analyses, molar conductance measurement, magnetic susceptibility, FT‐IR, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C{¹H}‐NMR, electronic spectroscopy and FAB‐Mass spectrometry. Catalytic activity of these complexes has been investigated in hydrolysis of benzonitrile. All the complexes exhibit good antibacterial activity against gram‐negative bacteria Escherichia coli in comparison to Chloramphenicol.     

Structural Diversity of Metallosupramolecular Assemblies from Cu(phen)2+ (phen = 1,10‐Phenanthroline) Building Blocks and 4,4′‐Bipyridine

Attempts to crystal engineer metallosupramolecularcomplexes from Cu(phen)²⁺ building blocks and the prototypical,rod‐like, exo‐bidentate ligand 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) by layering techniques are described. Reactions of Cu(phen)²⁺ (phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline) with 4,4′‐bipy in the presence of NO₃^– counterions yielded two distinct, discrete, dinuclear, C_i symmetric, dumbbell‐typecomplexes, [{Cu(NO₃)₂(phen)}₂(4,4′‐bipy)] ( 1 ) and [{Cu(NO₃)(phen)(H₂O)}₂(4,4′‐bipy)](NO₃)₂ ( 2 ), depending upon the mixture of solvents used for crystallization. In compound 1 , a mono‐ and a bidentate nitrato group coordinate to Cu²⁺, whereas in 2 the monodentate nitrato groups are replaced by aqua ligands, which introduce additional hydrogen‐bond donor functionality to the molecule. The crystal structure of 1 was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis at 296 and 110 K. Upon cooling, a disorder‐order transition occurs, with retention of the space group symmetry. The crystal structure of 2 at room temperature was reported previously [Z.‐X. Du, J.‐X. Li, Acta Cryst. 2007 , E63, m2282]. We have redetermined the crystal structure of 2 at 100 K. A phase transition is not observed for 2 , but the low temperature single‐crystal structure determination is of significantly higher precision than the room temperature study. Both 1 and 2 are obtained phase‐pure, as proven by powder X‐ray diffraction of the bulk materials. Crystals of [Cu(phen)(CF₃SO₃)₂(4,4′‐bipy) · 0.5H₂O]_n ( 3 ), a one‐dimensional coordination polymer, were obtained from [Cu(CF₃SO₃)₂(phen)(H₂O)₂] and 4,4′‐bipy. In 3 , Cu(phen)²⁺ corner units are joined by 4,4′‐bipy via the two vacant cis sites to form polymeric zig‐zag chains, which are tightly packed in the crystal. Compounds 1 – 3 were further studied by infrared spectroscopy.     

Cyclopentadienyl Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Bridging Alkynylphosphine Ligands: Synthesis and Electrochemical Studies

The reaction of [CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂] (Cp=cyclopentadienyl) and [CpRuCl(dppe)] (dppe=Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂) with bis‐ and tris‐phosphine ligands 1,4‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₂C₆H₄ ( 1 ) and 1,3,5‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₃C₆H₃ ( 2 ), prepared by Ni‐catalysed cross‐coupling reactions between terminal alkynes and diphenylchlorophosphine, has been investigated. Using metal‐directed self‐assembly methodologies, two linear bimetallic complexes, [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₂(μ‐dppab)] ( 3 ) and [{CpRu(dppe)}₂(μ‐dppab)](PF₆)₂ ( 4 ), and the mononuclear complex [CpRuCl(PPh₃)(η¹‐dppab)] ( 6 ), which contains a “dangling arm” ligand, were prepared (dppab=1,4‐bis[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene). Moreover, by using the triphosphine 1,3,5‐tris[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene (tppab), the trimetallic [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₃(μ₃‐tppab)] ( 5 ) species was synthesised, which is the first example of a chiral‐at‐ruthenium complex containing three different stereogenic centres. Besides these open‐chain complexes, the neutral cyclic species [{CpRuCl(μ‐dppab)}₂] ( 7 ) was also obtained under different experimental conditions. The coordination chemistry of such systems towards supramolecular assemblies was tested by reaction of the bimetallic precursor 3 with additional equivalents of ligand 2 . Two rigid macrocycles based on cis coordination of dppab to [CpRu(PPh₃)] were obtained, that is, the dinuclear complex [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₂](PF₆)₂ ( 8 ) and the tetranuclear square [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₄](PF₆)₄ ( 9 ). The solid‐state structures of 7 and 8 have been determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis and show a different arrangement of the two parallel dppab ligands. All compounds were characterised by various methods including ESIMS, electrochemistry and by X‐band ESR spectroscopy in the case of the electrogenerated paramagnetic species.     

Stable N‐Heterocyclic Germylenes of the Type [Fe{(η5‐C5H4)NR}2Ge] and Their Oxidation Reactions with Sulfur,Selenium, and Diphenyl Diselenide

Three new N‐heterocyclic germylenes of the type [Fe{(η⁵‐C₅H₄)NR}₂Ge] ( 1R Ge) containing particularly bulky alkyl [R = 2‐adamantyl (Ad), 1,1,2,2‐tetramethylpropyl (Pr*)] or aryl substituents [R = 2,6‐diisopropylphenyl (Dipp)] were prepared and structurally characterized, in two cases (R = Ad, Dipp), by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Together with the previously described homologues with R = trimethylsilyl (TMS), tert‐butyl (tBu), and mesityl (Mes) their oxidative addition reactions with S₈ and Se₈ were studied, which afforded compounds of the type [ 1R Ge(μ‐E)]₂ (E = S, Se). The low solubility of most of these products severely hampered their purification and characterization. Nevertheless, their structural characterization by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction was possible in six cases (E = S, R = Ad, Pr*; E = Se, R = Ad, Pr*, Mes, Dipp). No solubility problems were encountered in oxidative addition reactions with diphenyl diselenide, affording products of the type 1R Ge(SePh₂)₂, whose crystal structures could be determined in four cases (R = TMS, tBu, Mes, Dipp). Short intramolecular CH ··· Se contacts compatible with hydrogen bonds were observed for [ 1Ad Ge(μ‐Se)]₂, [ 1Pr* Ge(μ‐Se)]₂, and 1tBu Ge(SePh₂)₂.     

Beryllium Halide Complexes Incorporating Neutral or Anionic Ligands: Potential Precursors for Beryllium Chemistry

Reactions of the beryllium dihalide complexes [BeX₂(OEt₂)₂] (X=Br or I) with N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA), a series of diazabutadienes, or bis(diphenylphosphino)methylene (DPPM) have yielded the chelated complexes, [BeX₂(TMEDA)], [BeX₂{(RN=CH)₂}] (R=tBu, mesityl (Mes), 2,6‐diethylphenyl (Dep) or 2,6‐diisopropylphenyl (Dip)), and the non‐chelated system, [BeI₂(κ¹‐P‐DPPM)₂]. Reactions of lithium or potassium salts of a variety of β‐diketiminates have given both three‐coordinate complexes, [{HC(RCNAr)₂}BeX] (R=H or Me; Ar=Mes, Dep or Dip; X=Br or I); and four‐coordinate systems, [{HC(MeCNPh)₂}BeBr(OEt₂)] and [{HC(MeCNDip)(MeCNC₂H₄NMe₂}BeI]. Alkali metal salts of ketiminate, guanidinate, boryl/phosphinosilyl amide, or terphenyl ligands, lead to dimeric [{BeI{μ‐[(OCMe)(DipNCMe)]CH}}₂], and monomeric [{iPr₂NC(NMes)₂}BeI(OEt₂)], [κ²‐N,P‐{(HCNDip)₂B}(PPh₂SiMe₂)NBeI(OEt₂)] and [{C₆H₃Ph₂‐2,6}BeBr(OEt₂)], respectively. Compound [{HC(MeCNPh)₂}BeBr(OEt₂)] undergoes a Schlenk redistribution reaction in solution, affording the homoleptic complex, [{HC(MeCNPh)₂}₂Be]. The majority of the prepared complexes have been characterized by X‐ray crystallography and multi‐nuclear NMR spectroscopy. The structures and stability of the complexes are discussed, as is their potential for use as precursors in poorly developed low oxidation state beryllium chemistry.     

Synthesen und NMR‐Untersuchungen von Salzen mit den neuen Anionen [PtXn(CF3)6‐n]2— (n = 0 ‐ 5, X = F,OH, Cl,CN) und die Kristallstrukturanalyse von K2[(CF3)2F2Pt(μ‐OH)2PtF2(CF3)2]·2H2O

Syntheses and NMR Spectroscopic Ivestigations of Salts containing the Novel Anions [PtX_n(CF₃)_6‐n]^2— (n = 0 ‐ 5, X = F, OH, Cl, CN) and Crystal Structure of K₂[(CF₃)₂F₂Pt(μ‐OH)₂PtF₂(CF₃)₂]·2H₂O The first syntheses of trifluoromethyl‐complexes of platinum through fluorination of cyanoplatinates are reported. The fluorination of tetracyanoplatinates(II), K₂[Pt(CN)₄], and hexacyanoplatinates(IV), K₂[Pt(CN)₆], with ClF in anhydrous HF leads after working up of the products to K₂[(CF₃)₂F₂Pt(μ‐OH)₂PtF₂(CF₃)₂]·2H₂O. The structure of the salt is determined by a X‐ray structure analysis, P2₁/c (Nr. 14), a = 11.391(2), b = 11.565(2), c = 13.391(3)Å, β = 90.32(3)°, Z = 4, R₁ = 0.0326 (I > 2σ(I)). The reaction of [Bu₄N]₂[Pt(CN)₄] with ClF in CH₂Cl₂ generates mainly cis‐[Bu₄N]₂[PtCl₂(CF₃)₄] and fac‐[Bu₄N]₂[PtCl₃(CF₃)₃], but in contrast that of [Bu₄N]₂[Pt(CN)₆] with ClF in CH₂Cl₂ results cis‐[Bu₄N]₂[PtX₂(CF₃)₄], [Bu₄N]₂[PtX(CF₃)₅] (X = F, Cl) and [Bu₄N]₂[Pt(CF₃)₆]. In the products [Bu₄N]₂[PtX_n(CF₃)_6‐n] (X = F, Cl, n = 0—3) it is possibel to exchange the fluoro‐ligands into chloro‐ and cyano‐ligands by treatment with (CH₃)₃SiCl und (CH₃)₃SiCN at 50 °C. With continuing warming the trifluoromethyl‐ligands are exchanged by chloro‐ and cyano‐ligands, while as intermediates CF₂Cl and CF₂CN ligands are formed. The identity of the new trifluoromethyl‐platinates is proved by ¹⁹⁵Pt‐ and ¹⁹F‐NMR‐spectroscopy.     

Preparation and Characterization of Trimethylsilylpyridylacetylene Bridged,Dicobalt Carbonyl Complexes Containing Bis(diphenylphosphino)methylene or Bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene Ligand

Reaction of an alkyne‐bridged dicobalt complex, [Co₂(CO)₆(μ‐Me₃SiC=Cpy)] 4 , with bis(diphenylphosphino)methylene (DPPM) or bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene (DPPE) in THF at 55 °C yielded a DPPM or DPPE doubly bridged dicobalt compound, [{μ‐P,P‐PPh₂CH₂PPh₂}Co₂(CO)₄(μ‐Me₃SiC=Cpy)] 5 or [{μ‐P,P‐PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂}Co₂(CO)₄(μ‐Me₃SiC≡Cpy)] 6 . Compound 5 and 6 were characterized by spectroscopic means as well as X‐ray crystal structure determination.     

Half‐Sandwich Iridium Complexes Bearing a Diprotic Glyoxime Ligand: Structural Diversity Induced by Reversible Deprotonation

Synthesis and deprotonation reactions of half‐sandwich iridium complexes bearing a vicinal dioxime ligand were studied. Treatment of [{Cp*IrCl(μ‐Cl)}₂] (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with dimethylglyoxime (LH₂) at an Ir:LH₂ ratio of 1:1 afforded the cationic dioxime iridium complex [Cp*IrCl(LH₂)]Cl ( 1 ). The chlorido complex 1 undergoes stepwise and reversible deprotonation with potassium carbonate to give the oxime–oximato complex [Cp*IrCl(LH)] ( 2 ) and the anionic dioximato(2?) complex K[Cp*IrCl(L)] ( 3 ) sequentially. Meanwhile, twofold deprotonation of the sulfato complex [Cp*Ir(SO₄)(LH₂)] ( 4 ) resulted in the formation of the oximato‐bridged dinuclear complex [{Cp*Ir(μ‐L)}₂] ( 5 ). X‐ray analyses disclosed their supramolecular structures with one‐dimensional infinite chain ( 1 and 2 ), hexagonal open channels ( 3 ), and a tetrameric rhomboid ( 4 ) featuring multiple intermolecular hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions.     

Lewis Base Behavior of Bridging Nitrido Ligands of Titanium Polynuclear Complexes

The Lewis base behavior of μ₃‐nitrido ligands of the polynuclear titanium complexes [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1 ) and [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₄] ( 2 ) to MX Lewis acids has been observed for the first time. Complex 1 entraps one equivalent of copper(I ) halide or copper(I ) trifluoromethanesulfonate through the basal NH imido groups to give cube‐type adducts [XCu{(μ₃‐NH)₃Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] (X=Cl ( 3 ), Br ( 4 ), I ( 5 ), OSO₂CF₃ ( 6 )). However, the treatment of 1 with an excess (≥2 equiv) of copper reagents afforded complexes [XCu{(μ₃‐NH)₃Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₄‐N)(CuX)}] (X=Cl ( 7 ), Br ( 8 ), I ( 9 ), OSO₂CF₃ ( 10 )) by incorporation of an additional CuX fragment at the μ₃‐N nitrido apical group. Similarly, the tetranuclear cube‐type nitrido derivative 2 is capable of incorporating one, two, or up to three CuX units at the μ₃‐N ligands to give complexes [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)_4?n{(μ₄‐N)CuX}_n] (X=Br ( 11 ), n=1; X=Cl ( 12 ), n=2; X=OSO₂CF₃ ( 13 ), n=3). Compound 2 also reacts with silver(I ) trifluoromethanesulfonate (≥1 equiv) to give the adduct [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₃{(μ₄‐N)AgOSO₂CF₃}] ( 14 ). X‐ray crystal structure determinations have been performed for complexes 8 – 13 . Density functional theory calculations have been carried out to understand the nature and strength of the interactions of [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1′ ) and [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₄] ( 2′ ) model complexes with copper and silver MX fragments. Although coordination through the three basal NH imido groups is thermodynamically preferred in the case of 1′ , in both complexes the μ₃‐nitrido groups act as two‐electron donor Lewis bases to the appropriate Lewis acids.     

An Air‐ and Water‐Tolerant Zinc Hydride Cluster That Reacts Selectively With CO2

The reaction of [Zn₃Cl₃ L ], in which L ^3? is a tris(β‐diketiminate) cyclophane, with K(sBu)₃BH afforded [Zn₃(μ‐H)₃ L ] ( 2 ), as confirmed by NMR spectroscopy, NOESY, and X‐ray crystallography. The complex 2 was air‐stable and unreactive towards water, methanol, and other substrates (e.g., nitriles) at room temperature over 24 h but reacted with CO₂ (ca. 1 atm) to generate [Zn₃(μ‐H)₂(μ‐1,1‐O₂CH)] ( 3 ). In contrast, [Zn₃(OH)₃ L ] ( 4 ) was found to be unreactive toward CO₂ over the course of several days at 90 °C.     

Synthesis and Structures of New Oxidation/ Cycloaddition Products of λ3‐Cyclodiphosphazanes

Reaction of the cyclodiphosphazane [(OC₄H₈N)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P(HN‐t‐Bu)] ( 1 ) with an equimolar quantity of diisopropyl azodicarboxylate afforded the phosphinimine product [(OC₄H₈N)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂ ‐i‐Pr)NHCO₂‐i‐Pr] ( 6 ) having a P^III‐N‐P^V skeleton. Similar products [(t‐BuNH)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂Et)NHCO₂Et] ( 7 ) and [(CO₂‐i‐Pr)HNN(CO₂‐i‐Pr)](t‐BuN=P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂POCH₂CMe₂CH₂O[P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂‐i‐Pr)NH(CO₂‐i‐Pr)] ( 8 ) were spectroscopically characterized in the reaction of [(t‐BuNH)P‐N‐t‐Bu]₂ ( 2 ) and [(t‐BuNH)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂POCH₂CMe₂CH₂OP(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P(NH‐t‐Bu)] ( 3 ) with diethyl‐ and diisopropyl azodicarboxylate, respectively. By contrast, the reaction of [(μ‐t‐BuN)P]₂[O‐6‐t‐Bu‐4‐Me‐C₆H₂]₂CH₂ ( 4 ) and [(C₅H₁₀N)P‐μ‐N‐t‐Bu]₂ ( 5 ) with diisopropyl azodicarboxylate afforded the mono‐ and bis‐oxidized compounds [(O)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P][O‐6‐t‐Bu‐4‐Me‐C₆H₂]₂CH₂ ( 9 ) and [(C₅H₁₀N)(O)P‐μ‐N‐t‐Bu]₂ ( 10 ), respectively. Oxidative addition of o‐chloranil to 7 and its DIAD analogue [(t‐BuNH)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂‐i‐Pr)NHCO₂‐i‐Pr] ( 11 ) afforded [(C₆Cl₄‐1, 2‐O₂)(t‐BuNH)P(μ‐N‐t‐Bu)₂P=N‐t‐Bu)(N(CO₂R)NHCO₂R] [R = Et ( 12 ) and i‐Pr ( 13 )] containing tetra‐ and pentacoordinate P^V atoms in the cyclodiphosphazane ring. The structures of 6 , 9 , 12 and 13 have been confirmed by X‐ray structure determination. For comparison, the X‐ray structure of the double cycloaddition product [(C₆Cl₄‐1, 2‐O₂)(t‐BuNH)PN‐t‐Bu]₂ ( 14 ), obtained from the reaction of 2 with two mole equivalents of o‐chloranil is also reported.     

Chalcogenide Derivatives of Imidotin Cage Complexes

Reaction of the secocubane [Sn₃(μ₂‐NHtBu)₂(μ₂‐NtBu)(μ₃‐NtBu)] ( 1 ) with dibutylmagnesium produces the heterobimetallic cubane [Sn₃Mg(μ₃‐NtBu)₄] ( 4 ) which forms the monochalcogenide complexes of general formula [ESn₃Mg(μ₃‐NtBu)₄] ( 5 a , E=Se; 5 b , E=Te) upon reaction with elemental chalcogens in THF. By contrast, the reaction of the anionic lithiated cubane [Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? with the appropriate quantity of selenium or tellurium leads to the sequential chalcogenation of each of the three Sn^II centres. Pure samples of the mono‐ or dichalcogenides are, however, best obtained by stoichiometric redistribution reactions of [Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? and the trichalcogenides [E₃Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? (E=Se, Te). These reactions are conveniently monitored by using ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy. The anion [Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄]^? also acts as an effective chalcogen‐transfer reagent in reactions of selenium with the neutral cubane [{Snμ₃‐N(dipp)}₄] ( 8 ) (dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) to give the dimer [(thf)Sn{μ‐N(dipp)}₂Sn(μ‐Se)₂Sn{μ‐N(dipp)}₂Sn(thf)] ( 9 ), a transformation that results in cleavage of the Sn₄N₄ cubane into four‐membered Sn₂N₂ rings. The X‐ray structures of 4 , 5 a , 5 b , [Sn₃Li(thf)(μ₃‐NtBu)₄(μ₃‐Se)(μ₂‐Li)(thf)]₂ ( 6 a ), [TeSn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄][Li(thf)₄] ( 6 b ), [Te₂Sn₃Li(μ₃‐NtBu)₄][Li([12]crown‐4)₂] ( 7 b′′ ) and 9 are presented. The fluxional behaviour of cubic imidotin chalcogenides and the correlation between NMR coupling constants and tin–chalcogen bond lengths are also discussed.     

Synthesis and X‐ray Structures of the Polycyclic Dimers {[PhB(μ‐NtBu)2AsN(tBu)H]LiI}2 and [PhB(μ‐NtBu)2AsN(tBu)Li]2

The metathesis of [PhB(μ‐NtBu)₂]AsCl and tBuN(H)Li in 1:1 molar ratio in diethyl ether produced the amido derivative [PhB(μ‐NtBu)₂AsN(tBu)H] ( 1 ) in good yield. The lithiation of 1 with one equivalent of nBuLi afforded the lithium salt [PhB(μ‐NtBu)₂AsN(tBu)Li] ( 2a ). Both 1 and 2a were characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. The crystal structure of 2a is comprised of a U‐shaped, centrosymmetric dimer in which the monomeric [PhB(μ‐NtBu)₂AsN(tBu)]^?Li⁺ units are linked by Li‐N interactions to give a six‐rung ladder. Oxidation of 2a with one‐half equivalent of I₂ in diethyl ether resulted in hydrogen abstraction from the solvent to give the dimeric lithium iodide adduct {[PhB(μ‐NtBu)₂AsN(tBu)H]LiI}₂ ( 1 ·LiI) with a central Li₂I₂ ring.     

Cyclometalated Iridium(III) Complexes Containing Semicarbazone Ligands: Synthesis,Characterization, Photophysical and Biological Studies

The synthesis, crystal structure, photophysical properties, and biological activity of the novel bis‐cyclometalated complexes [Ir(ptpy)₂(vnsc)] ( 2 ) and [Ir(ptpy)₂(acsc)] ( 3 ) [ptpy = 2‐(p‐tolyl)pyridinato, vnsc = vanillin semicarbazone, acsc = acetone semicarbazone] are described. The new compounds were prepared by the reaction of [{Ir(μ‐Cl)(ptpy)₂}₂] ( 1 ) with the corresponding semicarbazone ligands under basic conditions. The molecular structure of compound 3 was confirmed by a single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction study. The complex crystallized from chloroform as a mono‐ solvate in the orthorhombic space group Pcab with eight molecules in the unit cell.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Two Succinato‐Bridged Macrocyclic Nickel(II) Complexes

Two dinuclear succinato‐bridged nickel(II) complexes [Ni(RR‐L)]₂(μ‐SA)(ClO₄)₂ ( 1 ) and [Ni(SS‐L)]₂(μ‐SA)(ClO₄)₂ ( 2 ) (L = 5, 5, 7, 12, 12, 14‐hexamethyl‐1, 4, 8, 11‐tetraazacyclotetradecane, SA = succinic acid) were synthesized and characterized by EA, Circular dichroism (CD), as well as IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses revealed that the Ni^II atoms display a distorted octahedral coordination arrangement, and the succinato ligand bridges two central Ni^II atoms in a bis bidentate fashion to form dimers in 1 and 2 . The monomers of {[Ni(RR‐L)]₂(μ‐SA)}²⁺ and {[Ni(SS‐L)]₂(μ‐SA)}²⁺ are connected by O–H ··· O and N–H ··· O hydrogen bonds into a 1D right‐handed and left‐handed helical chain along the b axis, respectively. The homochiral natures of 1 and 2 are confirmed by the results of CD spectroscopy.     

The First [4+2]‐Coordinated Tetraorganolead Compound: Synthesis,Structure and Conversion into a Triorganolead Cation,a Benzoxaphosphaplumbole,and Diorganolead Dihalides

The syntheses and molecular structures, as determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis, of the first intramolecularly [4+2]‐coordinated tetraorganolead compound {4‐t‐Bu‐2, 6‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂C₆H₂}PbPh₃ ( 2 ) and the triphenyllead chloride adduct of the first intramolecularly coordinated benzoxaphosphaplumbole {[1(Pb), 3(P)‐Pb(Ph)₂OP(O)(OEt)‐5‐t‐Bu‐7‐P(O)(OEt)₂]C₆H₂·Ph₃PbCl} ( 3a ) are reported. The reaction of 2 with [Ph₃C]⁺ [PF₆]^— and p‐MeC₆H₄SO₃H, respectively, provides the triorganolead salts {4‐t‐Bu‐2, 6‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂C₆H₂}PbPh₂⁺X^— ( 4 , X = PF₆; 4a , X = p‐MeC₆H₄SO₃). Reaction of 2 with bromine and hydrogen chloride, respectively, gives the diorganolead dihalides {4‐t‐Bu‐2, 6‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂C₆H₂}PbPhX₂ ( 5 , X = Br; 6 , X = Cl).