First Principles (DFT) Characterization of RhI/dppp‐Catalyzed CH Activation by Tandem 1,2‐Addition/1,4‐Rh Shift Reactions of Norbornene to Phenylboronic Acid

The C?H activation in the tandem, “merry‐go‐round”, [(dppp)Rh]‐catalyzed (dppp=1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane), four‐fold addition of norborene to PhB(OH)₂ has been postulated to occur by a C(alkyl)?H oxidative addition to square‐pyramidal Rh^III?H species, which in turn undergoes a C(aryl)?H reductive elimination. Our DFT calculations confirm the Rh^I/Rh^III mechanism. At the IEFPCM(toluene, 373.15 K)/PBE0/DGDZVP level of theory, the oxidative addition barrier was calculated to be 12.9 kcal mol^?1, and that of reductive elimination was 5.0 kcal mol^?1. The observed selectivity of the reaction correlates well with the relative energy barriers of the cycle steps. The higher barrier (20.9 kcal mol^?1) for norbornyl–Rh protonation ensures that the reaction is steered towards the 1,4‐shift (total barrier of 16.3 kcal mol^?1), acting as an equilibration shuttle. The carborhodation (13.2 kcal mol^?1) proceeds through a lower barrier than the protonation (16.7 kcal mol^?1) of the rearranged aryl–Rh species in the absence of o‐ or m‐substituents, ensuring multiple carborhodations take place. However, for 2,5‐dimethylphenyl, which was used as a model substrate, the barrier for carborhodation is increased to 19.4 kcal mol^?1, explaining the observed termination of the reaction at 1,2,3,4‐tetra(exo‐norborn‐2‐yl)benzene. Finally, calculations with (Z)‐2‐butene gave a carborhodation barrier of 20.2 kcal mol^?1, suggesting that carborhodation of non‐strained, open‐chain substrates would be disfavored relative to protonation.     

Understanding the Deactivation Pathways of Iridium(III) Pyridine-Carboxiamide Catalysts for Formic Acid Dehydrogenation

The degradation pathways of highly active [Cp*Ir(κ²-N,N-R-pica)Cl] catalysts (pica=picolinamidate; 1 R=H, 2 R=Me) for formic acid (FA) dehydrogenation were investigated by NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations. Under acidic conditions (1 equiv. of HNO₃), 2 undergoes partial protonation of the amide moiety, inducing rapid κ²-N,N to κ²-N,O ligand isomerization. Consistently, DFT modeling on the simpler complex 1 showed that the κ²-N,N key intermediate of FA dehydrogenation ( I_NH ), bearing a N-protonated pica, can easily transform into the κ²-N,O analogue ( I_NH2 ; ΔG^≠≈11 kcal mol⁻¹, ΔG ≈−5 kcal mol⁻¹). Intramolecular hydrogen liberation from I_NH2 is predicted to be rather prohibitive (ΔG^≠≈26 kcal mol⁻¹, ΔG≈23 kcal mol⁻¹), indicating that FA dehydrogenation should involve mostly κ²-N,N intermediates, at least at relatively high pH. Under FA dehydrogenation conditions, 2 was progressively consumed, and the vast majority of the Ir centers (58 %) were eventually found in the form of Cp*-complexes with a pyridine-amine ligand. This likely derived from hydrogenation of the pyridine-carboxiamide via a hemiaminal intermediate, which could also be detected. Clear evidence for ligand hydrogenation being the main degradation pathway also for 1 was obtained, as further confirmed by spectroscopic and catalytic tests on the independently synthesized degradation product 1 c . DFT calculations confirmed that this side reaction is kinetically and thermodynamically accessible.     

Influence of metal ion on chelate–aryl stacking interactions

CCSD(T)/CBS and DFT methods are employed to study the stacking interactions of acetylacetonate‐type (acac‐type) chelates of nickel, palladium, and platinum with benzene. The strongest chelate–aryl stacking interactions are formed by nickel and palladium chelate, with interaction energies of −5.75 kcal mol⁻¹ and −5.73 kcal mol⁻¹, while the interaction of platinum chelate is weaker, with interaction energy of −5.36 kcal mol⁻¹. These interaction energies are significantly stronger than stacking of two benzenes, −2.73 kcal mol⁻¹. The strongest nickel and palladium chelate–aryl interactions are with benzene center above the metal area, while the strongest platinum chelate–aryl interaction is with the benzene center above the C2 atom of the acac‐type chelate ring. These preferences arise from very different electrostatic potentials above the metal ions, ranging from very positive above nickel to slightly negative above platinum. While the differences in electrostatic potentials above metal atoms cause different geometries with the most stable interaction among the three metals, the dispersion (correlation energy) component is the largest contribution to the total interaction energy for all three metals.     

Nd[Al(iPrO)4]3, a novel tetranuclear alkoxide forming merohedrally twinned crystals

The new tetranuclear alkoxide hexa‐μ₂‐isopropoxy‐1:2κ⁴O;1:3κ⁴O;1:4κ⁴O‐hexaisopropoxy‐2κ²O,3κ²O,4κ²O‐trialumin­ium(III)­neodymium(III), [Nd{Al(C₃H₇O)₄}₃], has a metal–oxy­gen NdAl₃O₁₂ core which consists of four metal atoms arranged in an approximately planar triangular geometry. The central Nd atom is six‐coordinated by O atoms and the Al atoms are four‐coordinated by O atoms.     

Bis­(di‐μ‐acetato‐aqua{2‐[N‐ethyl‐N‐(2‐hydroxy‐4‐methyl­benzyl)­amino­methyl]‐1‐methyl­benz­imid­az­ole}­nickel)­nickel(II) tetra­hy­drate

The previously unknown title compound, tetra‐μ‐ace­tato‐1:2κ²O;1:2κ²O:O′;­2:3κ²O;­2:3κ²O:O′‐di­aqua‐1κO,3κO‐bis­(μ‐2‐{[N‐ethyl‐N‐(2‐hy­droxy‐5‐methylbenzyl)­am­ino]­methyl}‐1‐methyl‐1H‐benz­imid­az­ole)‐1κ³N³,N,O:2κO;3κ³N³,N,O:2κO‐tri­nickel(II) tetra­hy­drate, [Ni₃(C₁₈H₂₂N₃O)₂(C₂H₃O₂)₄(H₂O)₂]·­4H₂O, (I), is a centrosymmetric linear trinuclear nickel(II) complex, where the Ni atoms are in an octahedral coordination and the ligand heteroatoms act so as to model amino acid residues.     

σ‐Insertive Mechanism versus Concerted Non‐insertive Mechanism in the Intramolecular Hydroamination of Aminoalkenes Catalyzed by Phenoxyamine Magnesium Complexes: A Synthetic and Computational Study

The phenoxyamine magnesium complexes [{ONN}MgCH₂Ph] ( 4 a : {ONN}=2,4‐tBu₂‐6‐(CH₂NMeCH₂CH₂NMe₂)C₆H₂O^?; 4 b : {ONN}=4‐tBu‐2‐(CH₂NMeCH₂CH₂NMe₂)‐6‐(SiPh₃)C₆H₂O^?) have been prepared and investigated with respect to their catalytic activity in the intramolecular hydroamination of aminoalkenes. The sterically more shielded triphenylsilyl‐substituted complex 4 b exhibits better thermal stability and higher catalytic activity. Kinetic investigations using complex 4 b in the cyclisation of 1‐allylcyclohexyl)methylamine ( 5 b ), respectively, 2,2‐dimethylpent‐4‐en‐1‐amine ( 5 c ), reveal a first‐order rate dependence on substrate and catalyst concentration. A significant primary kinetic isotope effect of 3.9±0.2 in the cyclisation of 5 b suggests significant N?H bond disruption in the rate‐determining transition state. The stoichiometric reaction of 4 b with 5 c revealed that at least two substrate molecules are required per magnesium centre to facilitate cyclisation. The reaction mechanism was further scrutinized computationally by examination of two rivalling mechanistic pathways. One scenario involves a coordinated amine molecule assisting in a concerted non‐insertive N?C ring closure with concurrent amino proton transfer from the amine onto the olefin, effectively combining the insertion and protonolysis step to a single step. The alternative mechanistic scenario involves a reversible olefin insertion step followed by rate‐determining protonolysis. DFT reveals that a proton‐assisted concerted N?C/C?H bond‐forming pathway is energetically prohibitive in comparison to the kinetically less demanding σ‐insertive pathway (ΔΔG^≠=5.6 kcal mol^?1). Thus, the σ‐insertive pathway is likely traversed exclusively. The DFT predicted total barrier of 23.1 kcal mol^?1 (relative to the {ONN}Mg pyrrolide catalyst resting state) for magnesium?alkyl bond aminolysis matches the experimentally determined Eyring parameter (ΔG^≠=24.1(±0.6) kcal mol^?1 (298 K)) gratifyingly well.     

C−H Bond Activation/Arylation Catalyzed by Arene–Ruthenium–Aniline Complexes in Water

Water‐soluble arene–ruthenium complexes coordinated with readily available aniline‐based ligands were successfully employed as highly active catalysts in the C?H bond activation and arylation of 2‐phenylpyridine with aryl halides in water. A variety of (hetero)aryl halides were also used for the ortho‐C?H bond arylation of 2‐phenylpyridine to afford the corresponding ortho‐ monoarylated products as major products in moderate to good yields. Our investigations, including time‐scaled NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry studies, evidenced that the coordinating aniline‐based ligands, having varying electronic and steric properties, had a significant influence on the catalytic activity of the resulting arene–ruthenium–aniline‐based complexes. Moreover, mass spectrometry identification of the cycloruthenated species, {(η⁶‐arene)Ru(κ²‐C,N‐phenylpyridine)}⁺, and several ligand‐coordinated cycloruthenated species, such as [(η⁶‐arene)Ru(4‐methylaniline)(κ²‐C,N‐phenylpyridine)]⁺, found during the reaction of 2‐phenylpyridine with the arene–ruthenium–aniline complexes further authenticated the crucial roles of these species in the observed highly active and tuned catalyst. At last, the structures of a few of the active catalysts were also confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Theoretical Study of the Reaction Formalhydrazone with Singlet Oxygen. Fragmentation of the C=N Bond,Ene Reaction and Other Processes

Photobiologic and synthetic versatility of hydrazones has not yet been established with ¹O₂ as a route to commonly encountered nitrosamines. Thus, to determine whether the “parent” reaction of formalhydrazone and ¹O₂ leads to facile C=N bond cleavage and resulting nitrosamine formation, we have carried out CCSD(T)//DFT calculations and analyzed the energetics of the oxidation pathways. A [2 + 2] pathway occurs via diradicals and formation of 3‐amino‐1,2,3‐dioxazetidine in a 16 kcal/mol^?1 process. Reversible addition or physical quenching of ¹O₂ occurs either on the formalhydrazone carbon for triplet diradicals at 2–3 kcal mol^?1, or on the nitrogen (N(3)) atom forming zwitterions at ~15 kcal/mol^?1, although the quenching channel by charge‐transfer interaction was not computed. The computations also predict a facile conversion of formalhydrazone and ¹O₂ to hydroperoxymethyl diazene in a low‐barrier ‘ene’ process, but no 2‐amino‐oxaziridine‐O‐oxide (perepoxide‐like) intermediate was found. A Benson‐like analysis (group increment calculations) on the closed‐shell species are in accord with the quantum chemical results.     

A mixed bridged trinuclear copper(II)–1,10‐phenanthroline complex with a linear structure

The title compound, diaqua‐1κO,3κO‐di‐μ‐hydroxido‐1:2κ²O:O,2:3κ²O:O‐di‐μ‐methacrylato‐1:2κ²O:O′,2:3κ²O:O′‐bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)‐1κ²N,N′;3κ²N,N′‐tricopper(II) dinitrate dihydrate, [Cu₃(C₄H₅O₂)₂(OH)₂(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(H₂O)₂](NO₃)₂·2H₂O, has the central Cu atom on an inversion centre. The three Cu^II atoms are in a linear arrangement linked by methacrylate and hydroxide groups. The coordination environments of the Cu^II ions are five‐coordinated distorted square‐pyramidal for the outer Cu atoms and four‐coordinated square‐planar for the central Cu atom. All nitrate ions, hydroxide groups and water molecules are linked by hydrogen bonds, forming a linear structure. The complex exhibits ferromagnetic exchange coupling, which is helpful in elucidating magnetic interactions between copper ions and other metallic ions in heteronuclear complexes.     

Designing a heterotrinuclear CuII—NiII—CuII complex from a mononuclear CuII Schiff base precursor with dicyanamide as a coligand: synthesis,crystal structure,thermal and photoluminescence properties

Schiff bases are considered `versatile ligands' in coordination chemistry. The design of polynuclear complexes has become of interest due to their facile preparations and varied synthetic, structural and magnetic properties. The reaction of the `ligand complex' [CuL] {H₂L is 2,2′‐[propane‐1,3‐diylbis(nitrilomethanylylidene)]diphenol} with Ni(OAc)₂·4H₂O (OAc is acetate) in the presence of dicyanamide (dca) leads to the formation of bis(dicyanamido‐1κN¹)bis(dimethyl sulfoxide)‐2κO,3κO‐bis{μ‐2,2′‐[propane‐1,3‐diylbis(nitrilomethanylylidene)]diphenolato}‐1:2κ⁶O,O′:O,N,N′,O′;1:3κ⁶O,O′:O,N,N′,O′‐dicopper(II)nickel(II), [Cu₂Ni(C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂)₂(C₂N₃)₂(C₂H₆OS)₂]. The complex shows strong absorption bands in the frequency region 2155–2269 cm⁻¹, which clearly proves the presence of terminal bonding dca groups. A single‐crystal X‐ray study revealed that two [CuL] units coordinate to an Ni^II atom through the phenolate O atoms, with double phenolate bridges between Cu^II and Ni^II atoms. Two terminal dca groups complete the distorted octahedral geometry around the central Ni^II atom. According to differential thermal analysis–thermogravimetric analysis (DTA–TGA), the title complex is stable up to 423 K and thermal decomposition starts with the release of two coordinated dimethyl sulfoxide molecules. Free H₂L exhibits photoluminescence properties originating from intraligand (π–π*) transitions and fluorescence quenching is observed on complexation of H₂L with Cu^II.     

Synthesis,Enantiomeric Conformations,and Stereodynamics of Aromatic ortho‐Substituted Disulfones

Aromatic ortho‐disulfone derivatives are readily accessible from diiodide precursors by Cu^I‐mediated reaction with sodium sulfinate salts (DMF, 110°). The sulfonyl substituents adopt in solution and in the solid state two enantiomeric conformations (λ and δ) as evidenced by ³¹P‐ and ¹H‐NMR data of the chiral D₃‐symmetric tris{4,5‐bis[(4‐methylphenyl)sulfonyl]benzene‐1,2‐diolato(2?)‐κO,κO′}phosphate(v) anion ( 3a ) and 1,2‐bis(camphor‐10‐sulfonyl)‐4,5‐dimethoxybenzene ((=1,2‐bis{{[(1S,4R)‐7,7‐dimethyl‐2‐oxobicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐1‐yl]methyl}sulfonyl}‐4,5‐dimethoxybenzene; 6c ). X‐Ray structure analysis of 1,2‐dimethoxy‐4,5‐bis(methylsulfonyl)benzene ( 6a ) and 1,2‐dimethoxy‐4,5‐bis(4‐methylphenyl)sulfonyl]benzene ( 6b ) confirmed in the solid state the preferred chiral orientation of the sulfonyl groups. Dynamic conformational isomerism was detected for 6c in its ¹H‐NMR in the temperature range of 110°, the corresponding free energy being 19.8 kcal?mol^?1.     

A Computational Study of the Olefin Epoxidation Mechanism Catalyzed by Cyclopentadienyloxidomolybdenum(VI) Complexes

A DFT analysis of the epoxidation of C₂H₄ by H₂O₂ and MeOOH (as models of tert‐butylhydroperoxide, TBHP) catalyzed by [Cp*MoO₂Cl] ( 1 ) in CHCl₃ and by [Cp*MoO₂(H₂O)]⁺ in water is presented (Cp*=pentamethylcyclopentadienyl). The calculations were performed both in the gas phase and in solution with the use of the conductor‐like polarizable continuum model (CPCM). A low‐energy pathway has been identified, which starts with the activation of ROOH (R=H or Me) to form a hydro/alkylperoxido derivative, [Cp*MoO(OH)(OOR)Cl] or [Cp*MoO(OH)(OOR)]⁺ with barriers of 24.9 (26.5) and 28.7 (29.2) kcal mol^?1 for H₂O₂ (MeOOH), respectively, in solution. The latter barrier, however, is reduced to only 1.0 (1.6) kcal mol^?1 when one additional water molecule is explicitly included in the calculations. The hydro/alkylperoxido ligand in these intermediates is η²‐coordinated, with a significant interaction between the Mo center and the O^β atom. The subsequent step is a nucleophilic attack of the ethylene molecule on the activated O^α atom, requiring 13.9 (17.8) and 16.1 (17.7) kcal mol^?1 in solution, respectively. The corresponding transformation, catalyzed by the peroxido complex [Cp*MoO(O₂)Cl] in CHCl₃, requires higher barriers for both steps (ROOH activation: 34.3 (35.2) kcal mol^?1; O atom transfer: 28.5 (30.3) kcal mol^?1), which is attributed to both greater steric crowding and to the greater electron density on the metal atom.     

A photochromic dinuclear compound: aquatetrakis(μ‐2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)bis(2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)ethanolbis(1,10‐phenanthroline)dilanthanum(III)

The title dinuclear complex, (aqua‐1κO)tetrakis(μ‐2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato‐1:2κ²O:O′)bis(2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)‐1κO;2κO‐(ethanol‐2κO)bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)‐1κ²N,N′;2κ²N,N′‐dilanthanum(III), [La₂(C₁₅H₁₁O₂)₆(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(C₂H₅OH)(H₂O)], contains two similar La^III centres with distorted [LaO₆N₂] bicapped triganol–prismatic coordination polyhedra formed by six phenylcinnamate (PCA⁻ or 2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoate) ligands, two 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) ligands, a coordinating ethanol molecule and a coordinating water molecule. The two metal centres are bridged by four μ‐PCA⁻ ligands, with the remaining two PCA⁻ ligands coordinated in a monodentate fashion. The noncoordinated carboxylate O atoms on the terminal PCA⁻ ligands form O—H...O hydrogen bonds with the coordinated solvent molecules. Each La centre is also coordinated by a bidentate phen ligand. The PCA⁻ ligands all adopt syn–syn orientations, with the two phenyl rings presenting dihedral angles of about 70°. The compound displays photochromic behaviour both in solution and in the solid state.     

Phenalenyl‐Based Organozinc Catalysts for Intramolecular Hydroamination Reactions: A Combined Catalytic,Kinetic, and Mechanistic Investigation of the Catalytic Cycle

Herein, we report the synthesis and characterization of two organozinc complexes that contain symmetrical phenalenyl (PLY)‐based N,N‐ligands. The reactions of phenalenyl‐based ligands with ZnMe₂ led to the formation of organozinc complexes [N(Me),N(Me)‐PLY]ZnMe ( 1 ) and [N(iPr),N(iPr)‐PLY]ZnMe ( 2 ) under the evolution of methane. Both complexes ( 1 and 2 ) were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The solid‐state structures of complexes 1 and 2 were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 1 and 2 were used as catalysts for the intramolecular hydroamination of unactivated primary and secondary aminoalkenes. A combined approach of NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations was utilized to obtain better insight into the mechanistic features of the zinc‐catalyzed hydroamination reactions. The progress of the catalysis for primary and secondary aminoalkene substrates with catalyst 2 was investigated by detailed kinetic studies, including kinetic isotope effect measurements. These results suggested pseudo‐first‐order kinetics for both primary and secondary aminoalkene activation processes. Eyring and Arrhenius analyses for the cyclization of a model secondary aminoalkene substrate afforded ΔH^≠=11.3 kcal mol^?1, ΔS^≠=?35.75 cal K^?1 mol^?1, and E_a=11.68 kcal mol^?1. Complex 2 exhibited much‐higher catalytic activity than complex 1 under identical reaction conditions. The in situ NMR experiments supported the formation of a catalytically active zinc cation and the DFT calculations showed that more active catalyst 2 generated a more stable cation. The stability of the catalytically active zinc cation was further supported by an in situ recycling procedure, thereby confirming the retention of catalytic activity of compound 2 for successive catalytic cycles. The DFT calculations showed that the preferred pathway for the zinc‐catalyzed hydroamination reactions is alkene activation rather than the alternative amine‐activation pathway. A detailed investigation with DFT methods emphasized that the remarkably higher catalytic efficiency of catalyst 2 originated from its superior stability and the facile formation of its cation compared to that derived from catalyst 1 .     

Two different one‐dimensional CdII halide coordination polymers constructed through bridging carboxylate ligands

Two cadmium halide complexes, catena‐poly[[chloridocadmium(II)]‐di‐μ‐chlorido‐[chloridocadmium(II)]‐bis[μ₂‐4‐(dimethylamino)pyridin‐1‐ium‐1‐acetate]‐κ³O:O,O′;κ³O,O′:O], [CdCl₂(C₉H₁₂N₂O₂)]_n, (I), and catena‐poly[1‐cyanomethyl‐1,4‐diazoniabicyclo[2.2.2]octane [[dichloridocadmium(II)]‐μ‐oxalato‐κ⁴O¹,O²:O^1′,O^2′] monohydrate], {(C₈H₁₅N₃)[CdCl₂(C₂O₄)]·H₂O}_n, (II), were synthesized in aqueous solution. In (I), the Cd^II cation is octahedrally coordinated by three O atoms from two carboxylate groups and by one terminal and two bridging chloride ligands. Neighbouring Cd^II cations are linked together by chloride anions and bridging O atoms to form a one‐dimensional zigzag chain. Hydrogen‐bond interactions are involved in the formation of the two‐dimensional network. In (II), each Cd^II cation is octahedrally coordinated by four O atoms from two oxalic acid ligands and two terminal Cl⁻ ligands. Neighbouring Cd^II cations are linked together by oxalate groups to form a one‐dimensional anionic chain, and the water molecules and organic cations are connected to this one‐dimensional zigzag chain through hydrogen‐bond interactions.     

Constructing mixed‐metal coordination polymers from copper(II)–pyridinedicarboxylate metalloligands

In the mixed‐metal complex catena‐poly[bis[diaquasilver(I)] [bis[aquacopper(II)]‐μ₃‐pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylato‐2′:1:1′κ⁵N,O²:O⁵:O⁵,O^5′‐μ‐pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylato‐2:1κ⁴N,O²:O⁵,O^5′‐disilver(I)‐μ₃‐pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylato‐1:1′:2′′κ⁵O⁵,O^5′:O⁵:N,O²‐μ‐pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylato‐1′:2′′′κ⁴O⁵,O^5′:N,O²] hexahydrate], {[Ag(H₂O)₂][AgCu(C₇H₃NO₄)₂(H₂O)]·3H₂O}_n, a square‐pyramidal Cu^II center is coordinated by two N atoms and two O atoms from two pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylate (2,5‐pydc) ligands and a water molecule, forming a [Cu(2,5‐pydc)₂(H₂O)]²⁻ metalloligand. One Ag^I center is coordinated by five O atoms from three 2,5‐pydc ligands and, as a result, the [Cu(2,5‐pydc)₂(H₂O)]²⁻ metalloligands act as linkers in a unique μ₃‐mode connecting Ag^I centers into a one‐dimensional anionic double chain along the [101] direction. The other Ag^I center is coordinated by two water molecules, forming an [Ag(H₂O)₂]⁺ cation. Four adjacent Ag^I centers are associated by Ag...Ag interactions [3.126 (1) and 3.118 (1) Å], producing a Z‐shaped Ag₄ unit along the [010] direction and connecting the anionic chains into a two‐dimensional layer structure. This study offers information for engineering mixed‐metal complexes based on copper(II)–pyridinedicarboxylate metalloligands.     

Three different functions of a phosphinic amidato ligand in LNi(LLi)(LH) {L = [tBu2P(O)NEt]−}

The title paramagnetic compound, chloro‐2κCl‐[di‐tert‐butyl­phos­phinic ethylamide‐1κO]­bis­[μ‐di‐tert‐butyl­phos­phin­ic ethyl­amidato(1?)‐1:2κ⁴O:N]­lithium(I)­nickel(II), [NiLiCl(C₁₀H₂₃NOP)₂(C₁₀H₂₄NOP)], revealed an incomplete bischelation of Ni²⁺ by L^? {L = [^tBu₂P(O)NEt]^?}, with the formation of a pseudo‐tetrahedral NiON₂Cl chromophore. The Ni atom is coordinated by Cl^?, bidentate L^? and mono­dentate LLi (via N).     

Adsorption and dissociation of carbon trioxide on Ag(100)

Using density functional theory methods, we have studied carbon trioxide, its adsorption and dissociation on Ag(100). In the gas phase, two isomers are found, D_3h and C_2v, with the latter of 2.0 kcal mol^?1 lower in energy at the PW91PW91/6?31G(d) level. For CO₃ on Ag(100), the calculated adsorption energy is 91.2 and 89.1 kcal mol^?1 for the bi‐coord perpendicular and tri‐coord parallel structures, respectively. Upon the adsorption, 0.50 ～ 0.56 electron is transferred from silver to CO₃, indicative of significant ionic characters of the adsorbate‐surface bonding. In addition, the geometry of CO₃ is largely changed by its strong interaction with silver. For CO_3(ad) → O_(ad) + CO_2(gas), the energy barrier is calculated to be 19.8 kcal mol^?1 through the bi‐coord path. The process is endothermic with an enthalpy change of +17.3 ～ +26.7 kcal mol^?1 and the weakly chemisorbed CO₂ is identified as an intermediate on the potential energy surface. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2010     

Structure and Isotope Effects of the β‐H Agostic (α‐Diimine)Nickel Cation as a Polymerization Intermediate

Single‐crystal X‐ray characterization of cationic (α‐diimine)Ni‐ethyl and isopropyl β‐agostic complexes, which are key intermediates in olefin polymerization and oligomerization, are presented. The sharp Ni‐C_α‐C_β angles (75.0(3)° and 74.57(18)°) and short C_α−C_β distances (1.468(7) and 1.487(5) Å) provide unambiguous evidence for a β‐agostic interaction. An inverse equilibrium isotope effect (EIE) for ligand coordination upon cleavage of the agostic bond highlights the weaker bond strength of Ni−H relative to the C−H bond. An Eyring plot for β‐hydride elimination–olefin rotation–reinsertion is constructed from variable‐temperature NMR spectra with ¹³C‐labeled agostic complexes. The enthalpy of activation (ΔH ^≠) for β‐H elimination is 13.2 kcal mol⁻¹. These results offer important mechanistic insight into two critical steps in polymerization: ligand association upon cleavage of the β‐agostic bonds and chain‐migration via β‐H elimination.     

β‐Hydrogen transfer from poly(methyl methacrylate) propagating radicals to the nitroxide SG1: Analysis of the chain‐end and determination of the rate constant

Methyl methacrylate (MMA) was polymerized in bulk at 70 °C in the presence of an alkoxyamine initiator with low dissociation temperature (the so‐called BlocBuilder?) and increasing amounts of free N‐tert‐butyl‐N‐(1‐diethylphosphono‐2,2‐dimethylpropyl) nitroxide (SG1). Low final monomer conversions were reached, indicating a loss in radical activity due to side reactions such as irreversible homoterminations between the propagating radicals and β‐hydrogen transfer (also called disproportionation) from a propagating radical to a free‐SG1 nitroxide. Proton NMR and MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry were used to analyze the polymer chain‐ends and to clearly identify the main mechanism of irreversible termination. In particular, it was shown that all polymer chains were terminated by an alkene function in the presence of a large excess of free SG1, meaning that β‐hydrogen transfer from PMMA propagating radicals to the nitroxide SG1 was the major chain‐stopping event. On the other hand, for a low excess of free SG1, the two termination modes coexisted. Kinetic modeling was then performed using the PREDICI software, and the rate constant of β‐hydrogen transfer, k_βHtr, was estimated to be 1.69 × 10³ L mol^?1 s^?1 at 70 °C. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 6333–6345, 2008