Synthesis and Fluorescence Properties of Pyrimidine‐Based Diboron Complexes with Donor–π–Acceptor Structures

Pyrimidine‐based diboron complexes bearing β‐iminoenolate ligands and phenyl groups as bulky substituents on the boron atoms were synthesized as novel fluorescent dyes, and their fluorescence properties were investigated in solution and in the solid state. The diboron complexes with donor–π–acceptor structures showed positive solvatochromism in the fluorescence spectra. The cyano derivative exhibited the most dramatic redshift of the fluorescence maximum F_max with increasing solvent polarity (from 551 nm in n‐hexane to 710 nm in acetonitrile). The diboron complexes showed solid‐state fluorescence in the range of 578–706 nm with fluorescence quantum yields of 0.06–0.28. Additionally, the trifluoromethyl derivative exhibited solvent‐inclusion solid‐state fluorescence. The trifluoromethyl derivative formed toluene‐inclusion and ethyl acetate‐inclusion crystals. The toluene‐inclusion crystal (F_max=668 nm, Φ_f=0.16) showed a blueshifted F_max and higher Φ_f value compared to the original trifluoromethyl derivative (F_max=694 nm, Φ_f=0.08) in the solid state. On the other hand, the F_max (709 nm) and Φ_f (0.04) values of the ethyl acetate‐inclusion crystal were redshifted and lower, respectively.     

Host–Guest Recognition and Fluorescence of a Tetraphenylethene‐Based Octacationic Cage

We report the synthesis and characterization of a three‐dimensional tetraphenylethene‐based octacationic cage that shows host–guest recognition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g. coronene) in organic media and water‐soluble dyes (e.g. sulforhodamine 101) in aqueous media through CH???π, π–π, and/or electrostatic interactions. The cage?coronene exhibits a cuboid internal cavity with a size of approximately 17.2×11.0×6.96 ų and a “hamburger”‐type host–guest complex, which is hierarchically stacked into 1D nanotubes and a 3D supramolecular framework. The free cage possesses a similar cavity in the crystalline state. Furthermore, a host–guest complex formed between the octacationic cage and sulforhodamine 101 had a higher absolute quantum yield (Φ_F=28.5 %), larger excitation–emission gap (Δλ_ex‐em=211 nm), and longer emission lifetime (τ=7.0 ns) as compared to the guest (Φ_F=10.5 %; Δλ_ex‐em=11 nm; τ=4.9 ns), and purer emission (Δλ_FWHM=38 nm) as compared to the host (Δλ_FWHM=111 nm).     

Synthesis of an Interrupted AST‐Type Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework

Presented here is a new interrupted AST‐type zeolitic imidazolate framework, Zn₅(OH)(dmbim)₉(H₂O)? 4(DMF) ( 1 ) with cub and interrupted ast cages, which exhibits permanent porosity, high hydrophobicity and strong solid‐state photoluminescent properties. More importantly, structural ordered DMF molecules are firmly confined in the ‐ast cage by strong host‐guest interactions.     

A Solid‐State Fluorescent Host System with a 21‐Helical Column Consisting of Chiral (1R,2S)‐2‐Amino‐1,2‐diphenylethanol and Fluorescent 1‐Pyrenecarboxylic Acid

A solid‐state fluorescent host system was created by self‐assembly of a 2₁‐helical columnar organic fluorophore composed of (1R,2S)‐2‐amino‐1,2‐diphenylethanol and fluorescent 1‐pyrenecarboxylic acid. This host system has a characteristic 2₁‐helical columnar hydrogen‐ and ionic‐bonded network. Channel‐like cavities are formed by self‐assembly of this column, and various guest molecules can be included by tuning the packing of this column. Moreover, the solid‐state fluorescence of this host system can change according to the included guest molecules. This occurs because of the change in the relative arrangement of the pyrene rings as they adjust to the tuning of the packing of the shared 2₁‐helical column, according to the size of the included guest molecules. Therefore, this host system can recognize slight differences in molecular size and shape.     

Five related N′‐(2,2,2‐trichloroethanimidoyl)benzene‐1‐carboximidamides

In the solid state, 4‐methoxy‐N′‐(2,2,2‐trichloroethanimidoyl)benzene‐1‐carboximidamide, C₁₀H₁₀Cl₃N₃O, (I), N′‐(2,2,2‐trichloroethanimidoyl)benzene‐1‐carboximidamide, C₉H₈Cl₃N₃, (II), 4‐chloro‐N′‐(2,2,2‐trichloroethanimidoyl)benzene‐1‐carboximidamide, C₉H₇Cl₄N₃, (III), 4‐bromo‐N′‐(2,2,2‐trichloroethanimidoyl)benzene‐1‐carboximidamide, C₉H₇BrCl₃N₃, (IV), and 4‐trifluoromethyl‐N′‐(2,2,2‐trichloroethanimidoyl)benzene‐1‐carboximidamide, C₁₀H₇Cl₃F₃N₃, (V), display strong intramolecular N—H...N hydrogen bonding across the chelate ring and also intramolecular N—H...Cl contacts. Additional intermolecular hydrogen bonds link the molecules into chains, double chains or sheets in all cases except for compound (V). For compound (II), there are three independent molecules per asymmetric unit.     

Poly[[aquabis(μ2‐isonicotinato‐κ3N:O,O′)cadmium(II)] 1,4‐di‐3‐pyridyl‐2,3‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene hemisolvate]

The title compound, {[Cd(C₆H₄NO₂)₂(H₂O)]·0.5C₁₂H₁₀N₄}_n, presents an intricate three‐dimensional network with cavities traversing it in three orthogonal directions, where the (disordered) guest molecules lodge. The compound is a member of a series of coordination polymers presenting the same main host framework but with guests of variable size and geometry, to which the flexible skeleton seems to adapt. The disorder in the structure is explained in terms of an apparently well defined specificity in the position/orientation of the guest molecules, as determined by the main framework.     

Synthesis of α‐Cyclodextrin‐Conjugated Poly(ε‐lysine)s and Their Inclusion Complexation Behavior

Novel functional polymers utilizing specific host/guest interactions were designed by introducing α‐CD host molecules into poly(ε‐lysine) chains as side groups. An interesting phase separation was observed as a result of the inclusion complexation between the polymeric host and 3‐(trimethylsilyl)propionic acid as a model guest in aqueous media. This water‐soluble polymeric host would be useful for various applications, particularly drug delivery, due to its biodegradability, low toxicity, and unique functionality represented as a complexation‐induced phase separation.     

Supramolecular Assemblies of (±-2,2''''-Dihydroxy-1,1''''-binaphthyl with 2,2''''-Bipyridine and Naphthodiazine

Introduction Optically active 1,1'-bi-2-naphthol (BINOL) and its derivatives have been widely used as chiral ligands of catalysts for asymmetric reactions and effective host compounds for the isolation or optical resolution of a wide range of organic guest molecules through the for-mation of crystalline inclusion complexes.1,2 The wide-ranging and important applications of these com-pounds in organic synthesis have stimulated great inter-est in developing efficient methods for their prepara-…     

A Systematic Study of Fluorescence‐Based Detection of Nitroexplosives and Other Aromatics in the Vapor Phase by Microporous Metal–Organic Frameworks

A systematic study is conducted on four microporous metal–organic framework compounds built on similar ligands but different structures, namely [Zn₃(bpdc)₃(bpy)] ? 4 DMF ? H₂O ( 1 ), [Zn₃(bpdc)₃(2,2′dmbpy)] ? 4 DMF ? H₂O ( 2 ), [Zn₂(bpdc)₂(bpe)] ? 2 DMF ( 3 ), and [Zn(bpdc)(bpe)] ? DMF ( 4 ) (bpdc=4,4′‐biphenyldicarboxylate; bpy=4,4′‐bipyridine; 2,2′dmbpy=2,2′‐dimethyl‐4,4′bipyridine; bpe=1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane; DMF=N,N′‐dimethylformamide) to investigate their photoluminescence properties and sensing/detection behavior upon exposure to vapors of various aromatic molecules (analytes) including nitroaromatic explosives. The results show that all four compounds are capable of detecting these molecules in the vapor phase through fluorescence quenching or enhancement. Both electrochemical measurements and theoretical calculations are performed to analyze the analyte–MOF interactions, to explain the difference in signal response by different analytes, and to understand the mechanism of fluorescence quenching or enhancement observed in these systems. Interestingly, compound 3 also shows an emission frequency shift when exposed to benzene (BZ), chlorobenzene (ClBZ), and toluene (TO), which provides an additional variable for the identification of different analytes in the same category.     

Ethyl 1,4‐Dihydro‐4‐oxo‐1,8‐naphthyridine‐3‐carboxylates by a Tandem SNAr‐Addition‐Elimination Reaction

A series of N‐substituted 1,4‐dihydro‐4‐oxo‐1,8‐naphthyridine‐3‐carboxylate esters has been prepared in two steps from ethyl 2‐(2‐chloronicotinoyl)acetate. Treatment of the β‐ketoester with N,N‐dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal in N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) gave a 95% yield of the 2‐dimethylaminomethylene derivative. Subsequent reaction of this β‐enaminone with primary amines in DMF at 120^oC for 24 h then afforded the target compounds in 47–82% yields by a tandem S_NAr‐addition‐elimination reaction. Synthetic and procedural details as well as a mechanistic rationale are presented.     

Fluorescence Sensing and Selective Binding of a Novel 4,4′‐Sulfonyldianiline‐Bridged Bis(β‐cyclodextrin) for Bile Salts

A novel 4,4′‐sulfonyldianiline‐bridged bis(β‐cyclodextrin (CD)) 2 was synthesized, and its complex stability constants (K_s) for the 1 : 1 inclusion complexation with bile salts, i.e., cholate (CA), deoxycholate (DCA), glycocholate (GCA), and taurocholate (TCA) have been determined in phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) at 25° by fluorescence spectroscopy. The result indicated that 2 can act as efficient fluorescent sensor and display remarkable fluorescence enhancement upon addition of optically inert bile salts. Structures of the inclusion complexes between bile salts and 2 were elucidated by 2D‐NMR experiments, indicating that the anionic tail group and the D ring of bile salts penetrate into one CD cavity of 2 from the wide opening deeply, while the phenyl moiety of the CD linker is partially self‐included in the other CD cavity to form a host–linker–guest binding mode. As compared with native β‐CD 1 upon complexation with bile salts, bis(β‐CD) 2 enhances the binding ability and molecular selectivity. Typically, 2 gives the highest K_s value of 26200 M ^?1 for the complexation with CA, which may be ascribed to the simultaneous contributions of hydrophobic, H‐bond, and electrostatic interactions. These phenomena are discussed from the viewpoints of multiple recognition and induce‐fit interactions between host and guest.     

Inclusion compounds of 2,5‐di­phenyl­hydro­quinone

The crystal structures of three 1:2 inclusion compounds that consist of host mol­ecule 2,5‐di­phenyl­hydro­quinone (C₁₈H₁₄O₂) and the guest mol­ecules 2‐pyridone (C₅H₅NO), 1,3‐di­phenyl‐2‐propen‐1‐one (chalcone, C₁₅H₁₂O) and 1‐(4‐meth­oxy­phenyl)‐3‐phenyl‐2‐propen‐1‐one (4′‐methoxy­chal­cone, C₁₆H₁₄O₂) were determined in order to study the ability of guest mol­ecules in inclusion compounds to undergo photoreaction. All of the crystals were found to be photoresistant. The three inclusion compounds crystallize in triclinic space group . In each case, the host/guest ratio is 1:2, with the host mol­ecules occupying crystallographic centers of symmetry and the guest mol­ecules occupying general positions. The guest mol­ecules in each of the inclusion compounds are linked to the host mol­ecules by hydrogen bonds. In the inclusion compound where the guest mol­ecule is pyridone, the host mol­ecule is disordered so that the hydroxy groups are distributed between two different sites, with occupancies of 0.738 (3) and 0.262 (3). The pyridone mol­ecules form dimers via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

N‐(2‐Bromoethyl)‐4‐piperidino‐1,8‐naphthalimide and N‐(3‐bromopropyl)‐4‐piperidino‐1,8‐naphthalimide

N‐(2‐Bromoethyl)‐4‐piperidino‐1,8‐naphthalimide, C₁₉H₁₉BrN₂O₂, (I), and N‐(3‐bromopropyl)‐4‐piperidino‐1,8‐naphthalimide, C₂₀H₂₁BrN₂O₂, (II), are an homologous pair of 1,8‐naphthalimide derivatives. The naphthalimide units are planar and each piperidine substituent adopts a chair conformation. This study emphasizes the importance of π‐stacking interactions, often augmented by other contacts, in determining the crystal structures of 1,8‐naphthalimide derivatives.     

Highly Luminescent and Water‐Soluble Two‐Dimensional Supramolecular Organic Framework: All‐Organic Photosensitizer Template for Visible‐Light‐Driven Hydrogen Evolution from Water

A highly fluorescent (Φ_F=0.60) and water‐soluble two‐dimensional (2D) honeycomb‐shaped supramolecular organic framework (SOF) was successfully synthesized in pure aqueous solution via self‐assembly of novel cyanostilbene‐functionalized trilateral guest molecules and cucurbit[8]uril hosts. The size of this fluorescent 2D SOF was >500 nm in diameter, 1.7 nm in thickness, and 3.9 nm in the honeycomb pore diameter. This 2D SOF holds potential as a new all‐organic photosensitizer template for photocatalytic H₂ evolution from pure water.     

Adsorption behaviour of a CdII–triazole MOF for butan‐2‐one in a single‐crystal‐to‐single‐crystal (SCSC) fashion: the role of hydrogen bonding and C—H…π interactions

The adsorption behaviour of the Cd^II–MOF {[Cd(L)₂(ClO₄)₂]·H₂O ( 1 ), where L is 4‐amino‐3,5‐bis[3‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)phenyl]‐1,2,4‐triazole, for butan‐2‐one was investigated in a single‐crystal‐to‐single‐crystal (SCSC) fashion. A new host–guest system that encapsulated butan‐2‐one molecules, namely poly[[bis{μ₃‐4‐amino‐3,5‐bis[3‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)phenyl]‐1,2,4‐triazole}cadmium(II)] bis(perchlorate) butanone sesquisolvate], {[Cd(C₂₄H₁₈N₆)₂](ClO₄)₂·1.5C₄H₈O}_n, denoted C₄H₈O@Cd‐MOF ( 2 ), was obtained via an SCSC transformation. MOF 2 crystallizes in the tetragonal space group P4₃2₁2. The specific binding sites for butan‐2‐one in the host were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies. N—H…O and C—H…O hydrogen‐bonding interactions and C—H…π interactions between the framework, ClO₄^? anions and guest molecules co‐operatively bind 1.5 butan‐2‐one molecules within the channels. The adsorption behaviour was further evidenced by ¹H NMR, IR, TGA and powder X‐ray diffraction experiments, which are consistent with the single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. A ¹H NMR experiment demonstrates that the supramolecular interactions between the framework, ClO₄^? anions and guest molecules in MOF 2 lead to a high butan‐2‐one uptake in the channel.     

α‐Cyclodextrin Host–Guest Binding: A Computational Study of the Different Driving Forces

Free‐energy differences govern the equilibrium between bound and unbound states of a host and its guest molecules. The understanding of the underlying entropic and enthalpic contributions, and their complex interplay are crucial for the design of new drugs and inhibitors. In this study, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed with inclusion complexes of α‐cyclodextrin (αCD) and three monosubstituted benzene derivatives to investigate host–guest binding. αCD Complexes are an ideal model system, which is experimentally and computationally well‐known. Thermodynamic integration (TI) simulations were carried out under various conditions for the free ligands in solution and bound to αCD. The two possible orientations of the ligand inside the cavity were investigated. Agreement with experimental data was only found for the more stable orientation, where the substituent resides inside the cavity. The better stability of this conformation results from stronger Van der Waals interactions and a favorable antiparallel host–guest dipole–dipole alignment. To estimate the entropic contributions, simulations were performed at three different temperatures (250, 300, and 350 K) and using positional restraints for the host. The system was found to be insensitive to both factors, due to the large and symmetric cavity of αCD, and the nondirectional nature of the host–guest interactions.     

Inclusion of chlorophenols by 4,4′‐(cyclohexane‐1,1‐diyl)diphenol: structures and kinetics of decomposition

The structures of the inclusion compounds 4,4′‐(cyclohexane‐1,1‐diyl)diphenol–3‐chlorophenol (1/1) and 4,4′‐(cyclohexane‐1,1‐diyl)diphenol–4‐chlorophenol (1/1), both C₁₈H₂₀O₂·C₆H₅ClO, are isostructural with respect to the host molecule and are stabilized by extensive host–host, host–guest and guest–host hydrogen bonding. The packing is characterized by layers of host and guest molecules. The kinetics of thermal decomposition follow the R2 contracting‐area model, kt = [1 − (1 − α)^½], and yield activation energies of 105 (8) and 96 (8) kJ mol⁻¹, respectively.     

A Highly Luminescent Tetramer from a Weakly Emitting Monomer: Acid‐ and Redox‐Controlled Multiple Complexation by Cucurbit[7]uril

The tetrahedral, shape‐persistent molecule 1 ⁴⁺, containing four pyridylpyridinium units connected through a central carbon atom, exhibits unexpected photophysical properties including a substantially redshifted absorption (2350 cm^?1) and a very strong fluorescence (Φ_em=40 %), compared with the monomer 2 ⁺ (Φ_em=0.4 %). Density functional theory calculations on the structure and spectroscopic properties of 1 ⁴⁺ and 2 ⁺ show that exciton interactions, homoconjugation, and orbital nature account for the observed differences in their photophysical properties. The protonated tetramer binds four cucurbit[7]uril molecules and the host/guest interactions can be controlled by chemical (acid/base) as well as redox stimuli.     

Highly Efficient Singlet–Singlet Energy Transfer in Light‐Harvesting [60,70]Fullerene–4‐Amino‐1,8‐naphthalimide Dyads

New C₆₀ and C₇₀ fullerene dyads formed with 4‐amino‐1,8‐naphthalimide chromophores have been prepared by the Bingel cyclopropanation reaction. The resulting monoadducts were investigated with respect to their fluorescence properties (quantum yields and lifetimes) to unravel the role of the charge‐transfer naphthalimide chromophore as a light‐absorbing antenna and excited‐singlet‐state sensitizer of fullerenes. The underlying intramolecular singlet–singlet energy transfer (EnT) process was fully characterized and found to proceed quantitatively (Φ_EnT≈1) for all dyads. Thus, these conjugates are of considerable interest for applications in which fullerene excited states have to be created and photonic energy loss should be minimized. In polar solvents (tetrahydrofuran and benzonitrile), fluorescence quenching of the fullerene by electron transfer from the ground‐state aminonaphthalimide was postulated as an additional path.     

Effect of Bulkiness on Reversible Substitution Reaction at MnII Center with Concomitant Movement of the Lattice DMF: Observation through Single‐Crystal to Single‐Crystal Fashion

The porous coordination polymer ({[Mn(L)H₂O](H₂O)_1.5(dmf)}_n, 1 ) (DMF=N,N‐dimethylformamide) exhibits variety of substitution reactions along with movement of lattice DMF molecule depending upon bulkiness of the external guest molecules. If pyridine or 4‐picoline is used as a guest, both lattice and coordinated solvent molecules are simultaneously substituted (complexes 6 and 7 , respectively). If a bulky guest like aniline is used, a partial substitution at the metal centers and full substitution at the channels takes place (complex 8 ). If the guest is 2‐picoline (by varying the position of bulky methyl group with respect to donor N atom), one Mn^II center is substituted by 2‐picoline, whereas the remaining center is substituted by a DMF molecule that migrates from the channel to the metal center (complex 9 ). Here, the lattice solvent molecules are substituted by 2‐picoline molecules. For the case of other bulky guests like benzonitrile or 2,6‐lutidine, both the metal centers are substituted by two DMF molecules, again migrating from the channel, and the lattice solvent molecules are substituted by these guest molecules (complex 10 and 11 , respectively). A preferential substitution of pyridine over benzonitrile (complex 12 ) at the metal centers is observed only when the molar ratio of PhCN:Py is 95:5 or less. For the case of an aliphatic dimethylaminoacetonitrile guest, the metal centers remain unsubstituted (complex 13 ); rather substitutions of the lattice solvents by the guest molecules take place. All these phenomena are observed through single crystal to single crystal (SC–SC) phenomena.