Tetrakis(μ‐2,3‐dimethoxybenzoato)bis[(2,2′‐bipyridine)(2,3‐dimethoxybenzoato)lanthanum(III)]

The title compound, tetrakis(μ‐2,3‐di­methoxy­benzoato)‐κ⁴O:O′;κ⁶O,O′:O′‐bis[(2,2′‐bi­pyridine‐N,N′)(2,3‐di­methoxy­benzoato‐O,O′)lanthanum(III)], [La₂(2,3‐DMOBA)₆(2,2′‐bpy)₂], where 2,3‐DMOBA is 2,3‐di­methoxy­benzoate (C₉H₉O₄) and 2,2′‐bpy is 2,2′‐bi­pyridine (C₁₀H₈N₂), is a dimer with a centre of inversion between the La atoms bridged by four carboxyl­ate ligands. The central La atom is ennea‐coordinated and has a distorted monocapped square‐antiprism geometry.     

A photochromic dinuclear compound: aquatetrakis(μ‐2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)bis(2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)ethanolbis(1,10‐phenanthroline)dilanthanum(III)

The title dinuclear complex, (aqua‐1κO)tetrakis(μ‐2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato‐1:2κ²O:O′)bis(2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoato)‐1κO;2κO‐(ethanol‐2κO)bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)‐1κ²N,N′;2κ²N,N′‐dilanthanum(III), [La₂(C₁₅H₁₁O₂)₆(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(C₂H₅OH)(H₂O)], contains two similar La^III centres with distorted [LaO₆N₂] bicapped triganol–prismatic coordination polyhedra formed by six phenylcinnamate (PCA⁻ or 2,3‐diphenylprop‐2‐enoate) ligands, two 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) ligands, a coordinating ethanol molecule and a coordinating water molecule. The two metal centres are bridged by four μ‐PCA⁻ ligands, with the remaining two PCA⁻ ligands coordinated in a monodentate fashion. The noncoordinated carboxylate O atoms on the terminal PCA⁻ ligands form O—H...O hydrogen bonds with the coordinated solvent molecules. Each La centre is also coordinated by a bidentate phen ligand. The PCA⁻ ligands all adopt syn–syn orientations, with the two phenyl rings presenting dihedral angles of about 70°. The compound displays photochromic behaviour both in solution and in the solid state.     

Hydrothermal synthesis,crystal structure and photoluminescence of two homochiral zinc(II) coordination polymers

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have potentially useful applications and an intriguing variety of architectures and topologies. Two homochiral coordination polymers have been synthesized by the hydrothermal method, namely poly[(μ‐N‐benzyl‐L‐phenylalaninato‐κ⁴O,O′:O,N)(μ‐formato‐κ²O:O′)zinc(II)], [Zn(C₁₆H₁₆NO₂)(HCOO)]_n, (1), and poly[(μ‐N‐benzyl‐L‐leucinato‐κ⁴O,O′:O,N)(μ‐formato‐κ²O:O′)zinc(II)], [Zn(C₁₃H₁₈NO₂)(HCOO)]_n, (2), and studied by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, elemental analyses, IR spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy. Compounds (1) and (2) each have a two‐dimensional layer structure, with the benzyl or isobutyl groups of the ligands directed towards the interlayer interface. Photoluminescence investigations show that both (1) and (2) display a strong emission in the blue region.     

Three isotypic polymeric complexes with rare earth cations,but‐2‐enoate anions and 4,4′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)dipyridine and 4,4′‐(ethene‐1,2‐diyl)dipyridine bridging ligands

Three isotypic rare earth complexes, catena‐poly[[aquabis(but‐2‐enoato‐κ²O,O′)yttrium(III)]‐bis(μ‐but‐2‐enoato)‐κ³O,O′:O;κ³O:O,O′‐[aquabis(but‐2‐enoato‐κ²O,O′)yttrium(III)]‐μ‐4,4′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)dipyridine‐κ²N:N′], [Y₂(C₄H₅O₂)₆(C₁₂H₁₂N₂)(H₂O)₂], the gadolinium(III) analogue, [Gd₂(C₄H₅O₂)₆(C₁₂H₁₂N₂)(H₂O)₂], and the gadolinium(III) analogue with a 4,4′‐(ethene‐1,2‐diyl)dipyridine bridging ligand, [Gd₂(C₄H₅O₂)₆(C₁₂H₁₀N₂)(H₂O)₂], are one‐dimensional coordination polymers made up of centrosymmetric dinuclear [M(but‐2‐enoato)₃(H₂O)]₂ units (M = rare earth), further bridged by centrosymmetric 4,4′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)dipyridine or 4,4′‐(ethene‐1,2‐diyl)dipyridine spacers into sets of chains parallel to the [20] direction. There are intra‐chain and inter‐chain hydrogen bonds in the structures, the former providing cohesion of the linear arrays and the latter promoting the formation of broad planes parallel to (010).     

Dimeric hexakis(4‐methyl­benzoato)­bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)didyspros­ium(III)

The title compound, [Dy₂(C₈H₇O₂)₆(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂], forms binuclear complexes, viz. di‐μ‐4‐methyl­benzoato‐κ⁴O:O′‐bis[bis(4‐methyl­benzoato‐κ²O,O′)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)dyspros­ium(III)] tetra‐μ‐4‐methyl­benzoato‐κ⁸O:O′‐bis[(4‐methyl­benzoato‐κ²O,O′)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)dyspros­ium(III)]. There are two independent binuclear com­plexes in the asymmetric unit, both of which are centrosymmetric. In one, the Dy^III ions are linked by two bridging 4‐­methyl­benzoate groups, while in the other, the Dy^III ions are linked by four bridging 4‐methyl­benzoate groups. The remaining 4‐methyl­benzoate groups and 1,10‐phenanthroline units coordinate to just one metal ion in bidentate modes.     

The structure of {[Co(pht)(bpy)(H2O)]·3H2O}n (pht is phthalate and bpy is 4,4′‐bipyridine) and the role of solvent water clusters in structure stability

The Co^II cation in poly[[aqua(μ‐benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylato‐κ³O¹,O²:O¹)(μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐κ²N:N′)cobalt(II)] trihydrate], {[Co(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)]·3H₂O}_n, is octahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of two 4,4′‐bipyridine ligands, three O atoms from phthalate anions and a fourth O atom from a coordinated water molecule. The packing consists of planes of coordination polymers linked by hydrogen bonds mediated by three solvent water molecules; the linkage is achieved by the water molecules forming intricate oligomeric clusters which also involve the O atoms of the phthalate ligands.     

Acetate and acetamide complexes of [Ni(Me4[12]aneN4)]PF6: a tale of two ligands

Although there are many examples of acetate complexes, acetamide complexes are virtually unknown. A side‐by‐side comparison in (acetato‐κ²O,O′)(1,4,7,10‐tetramethyl‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐κ⁴N)nickel(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Ni(C₂H₃O₂)(C₁₂H₂₈N₄)]PF₆, (1), and (acetamidato‐κ²O,O′)(1,4,7,10‐tetramethyl‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐κ⁴N)nickel(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Ni(C₂H₄NO)(C₁₂H₂₈N₄)]PF₆, (2), shows the steric equivalence between these two ligands, suggesting that acetamide could be considered as a viable acetate replacement for electronic tuning.     

Bis­(acetato‐κ2O,O′)(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)mercury(II) in two differently hydrated crystal forms

Two differently hydrated crystal forms of the title compound, viz. bis­(acetato‐κ²O,O′)(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­mercury(II), [Hg(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₂)] or [HgAc₂(dmph)] [dmph is 2,3‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenantroline (neocuproine) and Ac is acetate], (I), and tris­[bis­(acetato‐κ²O,O′)(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­mercury(II)] hexadecahydrate, [Hg(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₂)]₃·16H₂O or [HgAc₂(dmph)]₃·16H₂O, (II), are presented. Both structures are composed of very simple monomeric units, which act as the building blocks of complex packing schemes stabilized by a diversity of π–π and hydrogen‐bonding interactions.     

Adducts of bis(acetylacetonato)zinc(II) with 1,10‐phenanthroline and 2,2′‐bipyridine

In each of the zinc(II) complexes bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)zinc(II), [Zn(C₅H₇O₂)₂(C₁₂H₈N₂)], (I), and bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ²N,N′)zinc(II), [Zn(C₅H₇O₂)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)], (II), the metal center has a distorted octahedral coordination geometry. Compound (I) has crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry, with Z′ = 0.5. The presence of a rigid phenanthroline group precludes intramolecular hydrogen bonding, whereas the rather flexible bipyridyl ligand is twisted to form an intramolecular C—H...O interaction [the chelated bipyridyl ligand is nonplanar, with the pyridyl rings inclined at an angle of 13.4 (1)°]. The two metal complexes are linked by dissimilar C—H...O interactions into one‐dimensional chains. The present study demonstrates the distinct effects of two commonly used ligands, viz. 1,10‐phenanthroline and 2,2′‐bipyridine, on the structures of metal complexes and their assembly.     

Di‐ and triphenylacetate complexes of yttrium and europium

The significant variety in the crystal structures of rare‐earth carboxylate complexes is due to both the large coordination numbers of the rare‐earth cations and the ability of the carboxylate anions to form several types of bridges between rare‐earth metal atoms. Therefore, these complexes are represented by mono‐, di‐ and polynuclear complexes, and by coordination polymers. The interaction of LnCl₃(thf)_x (Ln = Eu or Y; thf is tetrahydrofuran) with sodium or diethylammonium diphenylacetate in methanol followed by recrystallization from a DME/THF/hexane solvent mixture (DME is 1,2‐dimethoxyethane) leads to crystals of the non‐isomorphic dinuclear complexes tetrakis(μ‐2,2‐diphenylacetato)‐κ⁴O:O′;κ³O,O′:O′;κ³O:O,O′‐bis[(1,2‐dimethoxyethane‐κ²O,O′)(2,2‐diphenylacetato‐κ²O,O′)europium(III)], [Eu(C₁₄H₁₁O₂)₆(C₄H₁₀O₂)₂], (I), and tetrakis(μ‐2,2‐diphenylacetato)‐κ⁴O:O′;κ³O,O′:O′;κ³O:O,O′‐bis[(1,2‐dimethoxyethane‐κ²O,O′)(2,2‐diphenylacetato‐κ²O,O′)yttrium(III)], [Y(C₁₄H₁₁O₂)₆(C₄H₁₀O₂)₂], (II), possessing monoclinic (P2₁/c) symmetry. The [Ln(Ph₂CHCOO)₃(dme)]₂ molecule (Ln = Eu or Y) lies on an inversion centre and exhibits three different coordination modes of the diphenylacetate ligands, namely bidentate κ²O,O′‐terminal, bidentate μ₂‐κ¹O:κ¹O′‐bridging and tridentate μ₂‐κ¹O:κ²O,O′‐semibridging. The terminal and bridging ligands in (I) are disordered over two positions, with an occupancy ratio of 0.806 (2):0.194 (2). The interaction of EuCl₃(thf)₂ with Na[Ph₃CCOO] in methanol followed by crystallization from hot methanol produces crystals of tetrakis(methanol‐κO)tris(2,2,2‐triphenylacetato)‐κ⁴O:O′;κO‐europium(III) methanol disolvate, [Eu(C₁₉H₁₅O₂)₃(CH₃OH)₄]·2CH₃OH, (III)·2MeOH, with triclinic (P) symmetry. The molecule of (III) contains two O,O′‐bidentate and one O‐monodentate terminal triphenylacetate ligand. (III)·2MeOH possesses one intramolecular and four intermolecular hydrogen bonds, forming a [(III)·2MeOH]₂ dimer with two bridging methanol molecules.     

Three isomorphous Ln complexes: {[Ln2(bt)6(bno)(H2O)4]·bno}n (bt is but‐2‐enoate and bno is 4,4′‐bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide), with Ln = Nd,Er and Y

The polymeric title compounds, namely catena‐poly[[[di‐μ‐but‐2‐enoato‐κ³O:O,O′;κ³O,O′:O′‐bis[diaquadibut‐2‐enoato‐κO;κ²O,O′‐neodymium(III)]]‐μ‐4,4′‐bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide‐κ²O:O′] 4,4′‐bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide solvate] and the erbium(III) and yttrium(III) analogues, {[Ln₂(C₄H₅O₂)₆(C₁₀H₈N₂O₂)(H₂O)₄]·C₁₀H₈N₂O₂}_n (Ln = Nd, Er and Y), form from [Ln₂(bt)₆(H₂O)₄] dimers (bt is but‐2‐enoate) bridged by 4,4′‐bipyridyl dioxide (bno) spacers into sets of parallel chains; these linear arrays are interconnected by aqua‐mediated hydrogen bonds into broad two‐dimensional structures, which in turn interact with each other though the hydrogen‐bonded bridged bno solvent units. Both independent bno units in the structures are bisected by symmetry centres.     

First‐row transition metal–pyridine (py)–sulfate [(py)xM](SO4) complexes (M = Ni,Cu and Zn): crystal field theory in action

The crystal structures of three first‐row transition metal–pyridine–sulfate complexes, namely catena‐poly[[tetrakis(pyridine‐κN)nickel(II)]‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′], [Ni(SO₄)(C₅H₅N)₄]_n, (1), di‐μ‐sulfato‐κ⁴O:O‐bis[tris(pyridine‐κN)copper(II)], [Cu₂(SO₄)₂(C₅H₅N)₆], (2), and catena‐poly[[tetrakis(pyridine‐κN)zinc(II)]‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′‐[bis(pyridine‐κN)zinc(II)]‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′], [Zn₂(SO₄)₂(C₅H₅N)₆]_n, (3), are reported. Ni compound (1) displays a polymeric crystal structure, with infinite chains of Ni^II atoms adopting an octahedral N₄O₂ coordination environment that involves four pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands. Cu compound (2) features a dimeric molecular structure, with the Cu^II atoms possessing square‐pyramidal N₃O₂ coordination environments that contain three pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands. Zn compound (3) exhibits a polymeric crystal structure of infinite chains, with two alternating zinc coordination environments, i.e. octahedral N₄O₂ coordination involving four pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands, and tetrahedral N₂O₂ coordination containing two pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands. The observed coordination environments are consistent with those predicted by crystal field theory.     

Phenanthroline complexes of zinc and calcium carbamates

Bis(N,N‐di‐n‐butyl­di­thio­carbamato‐κ²S,S′)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­zinc(II) ethanol hemisolvate, [Zn(C₉H₁₈NS₂)₂(C₁₂H₈N₂)]·0.5C₂H₆O, (I), and bis(N,N‐di‐n‐hexyldithiocarbamato‐κ²S,S′)­bis(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)calcium(II), [Ca(C₁₃H₂₆NS₂)₂(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂], (II), are mixed‐ligand com­plexes. In the first compound, the Zn atom has a distorted octahedral coordination, while in the second compound, the Ca atom is eight‐coordinate, with four S and four N atoms forming a highly distorted cube.     

A linear heterometallic bismuth–copper coordination polymer containing two types of organic ligands

In the linear coordination polymer catena‐poly[[[aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)copper(II)]‐μ‐pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato‐κ⁴O²:O^2′,N,O⁶‐[(nitrato‐κ²O,O′)bismuth(III)]‐μ‐pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato‐κ⁴O²,N,O⁶:O^6′] dihydrate], {[Bi^IIICu^II(C₇H₃NO₄)₂(NO₃)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(H₂O)]·2H₂O}_n, the Bi^III cation is O,N,O′‐chelated by the two pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylate ligands and O,O′‐chelated by the nitrate anion, the nine coordinating atoms conferring a tricapped trigonal prismatic environment on the metal centre. Each pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylate ligand uses one of its carboxylate O atoms to bind to an aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline)copper(II) unit, the Cu—O dative bonds giving rise to the formation of a ribbon motif. The Cu^II cation exhibits a square‐pyramidal geometry. The ribbon motif propagates along the shortest axis of the triclinic unit cell and the solvent water molecules are hydrogen bonded to the same ribbon.     

Zn/Mn–MOFs with `S‐shaped' packing modes

Two novel polymers exhibiting metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been synthesized by the combination of a metal ion with a benzene‐1,3,5‐tricarboxylate ligand (BTC) and 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) under hydrothermal conditions. The first compound, poly[[(μ₄‐benzene‐1,3,5‐tricarboxylato‐κ⁴O:O′:O′′:O′′′)(μ‐hydroxido‐κ²O:O)bis(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)dizinc(II)] 0.32‐hydrate], {[Zn₂(C₉H₃O₆)(OH)(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂]·0.32H₂O}_n, denoted Zn–MOF, forms a two‐dimensional network in which a binuclear Zn₂ cluster serves as a 3‐connecting node; the BTC trianion also acts as a 3‐connecting centre. The overall topology is that of a 6³ net. The phen ligands serve as appendages to the network and interdigitate with phen ligands belonging to adjacent parallel sheets. The second compound, poly[[(μ₆‐benzene‐1,3,5‐tricarboxylato‐κ⁷O¹,O^1′:O¹:O³:O^3′:O⁵:O^5′)(μ₃‐hydroxido‐κ²O:O:O)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)dimanganese(II)] 1.26‐hydrate], {[Mn₂(C₉H₃O₆)(OH)(C₁₂H₈N₂)]·1.26H₂O}_n, denoted Mn–MOF, exists as a three‐dimensional network in which an Mn₄ cluster serves as a 6‐connecting unit, while the BTC trianion again plays the role of a 3‐connecting centre. The overall topology is that of the rutile net. Phen ligands act as appendages to the network and form the `S‐shaped' packing mode.     

(Benzoyl­acetonato)­chloro(1,10‐phen­anthroline)copper(II)

The crystal structure of the title compound, chloro(1,10‐phenanthroline‐N,N′)(1‐phenyl‐1,3‐butane­dion­ato‐O,O′)copper(II), [CuCl(C₁₀H₉O₂)(C₁₂H₈N₂)], has been determined. The Cu^II ion displays a distorted square‐pyramidal coordination, being linked to the two O atoms of the benzoyl­acetonate ligand and the two N atoms of the 1,10‐phenanthroline ligand in the basal plane, and the Cl atom in the apical site. TheCu—N, Cu—O and Cu—Cl bond lengths are 2.043 (2)/2.025 (2), 1.914 (2)/1.941 (2) and 2.485 (1) Å, respectively.     

A new two‐dimensional ZnII coordination polymer constructed by a multidentate N‐heterocyclic ligand and 5‐carboxybenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylate

In the coordination polymer, poly[[{μ‐1‐[(1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐imidazole‐κ²N:N′}(μ‐5‐carboxybenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ²O¹:O³)zinc(II)] dimethylformamide monosolvate pentahydrate], {[Zn(C₉H₄O₆)(C₁₁H₁₀N₄)]·C₃H₇NO·5H₂O}_n, the Zn^II ion is coordinated by two N atoms from two symmetry‐related 1‐[(1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐imidazole (bmi) ligands and two O atoms from two symmetry‐related 5‐carboxybenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylate (Hbtc²⁻) ligands in a slightly distorted tetrahedral geometry. The Zn^II ions are bridged by Hbtc²⁻ and bmi ligands, leading to a 4‐connected two‐dimensional network with the topological notation (4⁴.6²). Adjacent layers are further connected by 12 kinds of hydrogen bonds and also by π–π interactions, resulting in a three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture in the solid state.     

A two‐dimensional CdII coordination polymer with 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoate and 1,10‐phenanthroline ligands

In poly[[μ₃‐2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoato‐κ⁵O:O,O′:O′′,O′′′](1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)cadmium(II)], [Cd(C₁₄H₈O₄S₂)(C₁₂H₈N₂)]_n, the asymmetric unit contains one Cd^II cation, one 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoate anion (denoted dtdb²⁻) and one 1,10‐phenanthroline ligand (denoted phen). Each Cd^II centre is seven‐coordinated by five O atoms of bridging/chelating carboxylate groups from three dtdb²⁻ ligands and by two N atoms from one phen ligand, forming a distorted pentagonal–bipyramidal geometry. The Cd^II cations are bridged by dtdb²⁻ anions to give a two‐dimensional (4,4) layer. The layers are stacked to generate a three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture via a combination of aromatic C—H...π and π–π interactions. The thermogravimetric and luminescence properties of this compound were also investigated.     

Aqua(dipicolinato‐κ3O2,N,O6)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)manganese(II) monohydrate

In the title compound [systematic name: aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)(pyridine‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ³O²,N,O⁶)manganese(II) monohydrate, [Mn(C₇H₃NO₄)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(H₂O)]·H₂O, the manganese(II) centre is surrounded by one bidentate phenanthroline ligand [Mn—N = 2.248 (3) and 2.278 (3) Å], one tridentate dipicolinate ligand [Mn—N = 2.179 (3) Å, and Mn—O = 2.237 (2) and 2.266 (2) Å] and one water mol­ecule [Mn—O = 2.117 (3) Å], and it exhibits a strongly distorted octahedral geometry, with trans angles ranging from 144.12 (9) to 158.88 (11)°. Extensive intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions involving coordinated and uncoordinated water mol­ecules and the carboxyl O atoms of the dipicolinate ligand, as well as a stacking interaction involving the phenanthroline rings, are observed in the crystal structure.     

Copper(II) and cadmium(II) isothiocyanate coordination polymers with 4,4′‐bi‐1,2,4‐triazole

The coordination polymers catena‐poly[[[(4,4′‐bi‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κN¹)bis(thiocyanato‐κN)copper(II)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bi‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N¹:N^1′] dihydrate], {[Cu(NCS)₂(C₄H₄N₆)₂]·2H₂O}_n, (I), and poly[tetrakis(μ‐4,4′‐bi‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N¹:N^1′)bis(μ‐thiocyanato‐κ²N:S)tetrakis(thiocyanato‐κN)tricadmium(II)], [Cd₃(NCS)₆(C₄H₄N₆)₄]_n, (II), exhibit chain and two‐dimensional layer structures, respectively. The differentiation of the Lewis acidic nature of Cu^II and Cd^II has an influence on the coordination modes of the triazole and thiocyanate ligands, leading to topologically different polymeric motifs. In (I), copper ions are linked by bitriazole N:N′‐bridges into zigzag chains and the tetragonal–pyramidal CuN₅ environment is composed of two thiocyanate N atoms and three triazole N atoms [basal Cu—N = 1.9530 (18)–2.0390 (14) Å and apical Cu—N = 2.2637 (15) Å]. The structure of (II) contains two types of crystallographically unique Cd^II atoms. One type lies on an inversion center in a distorted CdN₆ octahedral environment, with bitriazole ligands in the equatorial plane and terminal isothiocyanate N atoms in the axial positions. The other type lies on a general position and forms centrosymmetric binuclear [Cd₂(μ‐NCS‐κ²N:S)₂(NCS)₂] units (tetragonal–pyramidal CdN₄S coordination). N:N′‐Bridging bitriazole ligands link the Cd centers into a flat (4,4)‐network.