The zwitterionic structure of 2‐hydroxy‐4‐[(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)amino]benzoic acid

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₁NO₄, exists in the solid phase in the zwitterionic form, 2‐{[(4‐carboxy‐3‐hydroxyphenyl)iminiumyl]methyl}phenolate, with the H atom from the phenol group on the 2‐hydroxybenzylidene ring transferred to the imine N atom, resulting in a strong intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond between the iminium H atom and the phenolate O atom, forming a six‐membered hydrogen‐bonded ring. In addition, there is an intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bond between the carboxylic acid group and the adjacent hydroxy group of the other ring, and an intermolecular C—H...O contact involving the phenol group and the C—H group adjacent to the imine bond, connecting the molecules into a two‐dimensional network in the (10) plane. π–π stacking interactions result in a three‐dimensional network. This study is important because it provides crystallographic evidence, supported by IR data, for the iminium zwitterionic form of Schiff bases.<!?tpb=12pt>     

Synthesis and characterization of (6‐{[2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)hydrazinylidene]methyl}pyridin‐2‐yl)methanol: a supramolecular and topological study

Hydrazones exhibit a versatile chemistry and are of interest for their potential use as functional molecular systems capable of undergoing reversible changes of configuration, i.e. E/Z isomerization. The title compound, C₁₂H₁₂N₄O, has an E configuration with respect to the hydrazone C=N bond. The crystal packing is formed by N—H...N and O—H...N hydrogen bonds that give a two‐dimensional layer structure and C—H...C interactions associated with layer stacking to produce the three‐dimensional supramolecular structure. These intermolecular interactions were analyzed and quantified by the Hirshfeld surface method and the two‐dimensional supramolecular arrangement was topologically simplified as a hcb network.     

Acetone‐4‐methyl­thio­semicarbazone at 220 K

In the title compound, C₅H₁₁N₃S, the trans conformation is stabilized by a weak intramolecular N—H?N hydrogen bond. Unusually, one N—H bond is not involved in any hydrogen‐bond interactions and instead the mol­ecules form a one‐dimensional polymer via N—H?S intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

Racemic 3,5‐di­chloro‐2‐{[(1‐phenyl­ethyl)­imino]­methyl}phenol

The title compound, (RS)‐3,5‐di­chloro‐2‐{[(1‐phenyl­ethyl)­imino]­methyl}phenol, C₁₅H₁₃Cl₂NO, was synthesized from racemic 1‐phenyl­ethyl­amine and 3,5‐di­chloro­salicyl­aldehyde. The π‐conjugate system around the imine group is essentially planar in the phenol–imine tautomer. Intramolecular O⋯N hydrogen‐bond and intermolecular C—H⋯π interactions are present in the crystal structure.     

Bis{2‐[(phenylimino)ethyl]‐1H‐pyrrol‐1‐ido‐κ2N,N′}nickel(II): a supramolecular structure formed by C—H...π hydrogen bonds

In the title compound, [Ni(C₁₂H₁₁N₂)₂], the Ni^II cation lies on an inversion centre and has a square‐planar coordination geometry. This transition metal complex is composed of two deprotonated N,N′‐bidentate 2‐[(phenylimino)ethyl]‐1H‐pyrrol‐1‐ide ligands around a central Ni^II cation, with the pyrrolide rings and imine groups lying trans to each other. The Ni—N bond lengths range from 1.894 (3) to 1.939 (2) Å and the bite angle is 83.13 (11)°. The Ni—N(pyrrolide) bond is substantially shorter than the Ni—N(imino) bond. The planes of the phenyl rings make a dihedral angle of 78.79 (9)° with respect to the central NiN₄ plane. The molecules are linked into simple chains by an intermolecular C—H...π interaction involving a phenyl β‐C atom as donor. Intramolecular C—H...π interactions are also present.     

3‐(p‐Chloro­phenyl)‐4‐phenyl‐4,5‐di­hydro­isoxazole‐5‐spiro‐2′‐1′,2′,3′,4′‐tetra­hydro­naphthalen‐1′‐one

In the title compound, C₂₄H₁₈ClNO₂, the phenyl ring and the tetralone moiety are approximately orthogonal to the isoxazoline ring. The isoxazoline ring adopts an envelope conformation, while the cyclo­hexenone ring of the tetralone moiety has an intermediate sofa/half‐chair conformation. In this structure, one C—H?N intermolecular and two C—H?O intramolecular hydrogen bonds occur; the H?A distances are 2.60, and 2.35 and 2.57 Å, respectively. The mol­ecules are held together by an intermolecular C—H?N hydrogen bond, forming a one‐dimensional chain along the [100] direction.     

Bis(2‐{1‐[(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)imino]ethyl}pyrrol‐1‐ido‐κ2N,N′)nickel(II): a supramolecular structure formed by C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds

<!?tlsb=‐0.2pt>Nitrogen‐based polydentate ligands are of interest owing to their flexible complexation to transition metal atoms. For the title compound, [Ni(C₁₅H₁₇N₂)₂], a transition metal complex formed by the coordination of two identical N,N′‐bidentate mono(imino)pyrrolyl ligands to an Ni^II centre, an X‐ray crystal diffraction study indicates that the two ligands show an inverted arrangement with respect to one another around the Ni^II centre, which is located on a crystallographic inversion centre. The planes of the aromatic substituents at the imine N atoms of the ligands show dihedral angles of 85.91 (5)° with respect to the NiN₄ plane. The Ni—N bond lengths are in the range 1.9072 (15)–1.9330 (15) Å and the N_imino—Ni—N_pyrrole bite angles are 83.18 (6)°. The Ni—N_pyrrole bond is substantially shorter than the Ni—N_imino bond. Molecules are linked into an extensive network by means of intermolecular C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds in which every molecule acts both as hydrogen‐bond donor and acceptor. The supramolecular assembly takes the form of an infinite two‐dimensional sheet.     

Zwitterionic pyrrolidine‐2,2‐diylbis(phosphonic acid) at 100, 150 and 293 K

The title compound, C₄H₁₁NO₆P₂, reveals a two‐dimensional network of P—O—H?O=P and N—H?O=P hydrogen‐bond interactions, forming molecular slabs parallel with the (010) plane. One O—H?O interaction is distinct within these sets: whilst forming the shortest intermolecular hydrogen bond, it possesses a short P—O(H) bond of 1.5291 (10) Å. Weak C—H?O contacts link individual stacks to produce a three‐dimensional array. The compound is zwitterionic: one H atom from a P—O—H group has transferred to the pyrrolidine ring N atom.     

2‐(3‐tert‐Butyldimethylsiloxy‐4‐methoxyphenyl)‐6‐methoxy‐3‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxybenzoyl)indole

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C₃₂H₃₉NO₇Si, all geometric parameters fall within experimental error of expected values. The analysis of molecular‐packing plots reveals an infinite two‐dimensional linear array running parallel to the b axis, formed by one N—H?O intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interaction. Several potential C—H?O interactions are also present.     

catena‐Poly­[[[cis‐bis(1‐phenyl­tetra­zole‐κN4)copper(II)]‐di‐μ‐chloro] hemi(1‐phenyl­tetrazole)]

The title compound, {[CuCl₂(PhTz)₂]·0.5PhTz}_n (PhTz is 1‐­phenyl­tetrazole, C₇H₆N₄), has a polymeric structure, with uncoordinated disordered PhTz mol­ecules in the cavities. The coordination polyhedron of the Cu atom is a highly elongated octahedron. The equatorial positions are occupied by two Cl atoms [Cu—Cl = 2.2687 (9) and 2.2803 (7) Å] and two N atoms of the PhTz ligands [Cu—N = 2.0131 (19) and 2.0317 (18) Å]. The more distant axial positions are occupied by two Cl atoms [Cu—Cl = 3.0307 (12) and 2.8768 (11) Å] that lie in the equatorial planes of two neighbouring Cu octahedra. The [CuCl₂(PhTz)₂] units are linked by Cu—Cl bridges into infinite chains extending parallel to the a axis. The chains are linked into two‐dimensional networks by intermolecular C—H⋯N interactions between the phenyl and tetrazole fragments, and by face‐to‐face π–π interactions between symmetry‐related phenyl rings. These two‐dimensional networks, which lie parallel to the ac plane, are connected by intermolecular π–π stacking interactions between phenyl rings, thus forming a three‐dimensional network.     

An interpenetrating primitive cubic net formed by hydrogen bonds and coordination bonds in catena‐poly[[bis(methanol‐κO)bis(thiocyanato‐κN)iron(II)]‐μ‐1,2‐bis(4‐pyridylmethylene)hydrazine‐κ2N:N′]

In the title compound, [Fe(NCS)₂(C₁₂H₁₀N₄)(CH₄O)₂]_n, at 153 (2) K, the Fe atom is located on an inversion centre, as is the centre of the N—N bond in the ligand molecule. The structure contains a one‐dimensional coordination polymer with an Fe...Fe distance of 15.866 (7) Å and can be described as two interpenetrating six‐connected primitive cubic (pcu) three‐dimensional networks when additional intermolecular O—H...S hydrogen bonds are taken into account. The compound is not isostructural with the corresponding Mn^II compound as they differ in the rotation around the M—O bond by 90°, giving rise to completely different hydrogen‐bond patterns. This study demonstrates the impact of conformational differences on the final supramolecular arrangement.     

1‐(4‐Methyl­amino‐1,2,5‐thia­diazo­le‐3‐carbonyl)­thio­semicarbazide

In the title compound, C₅H₈N₆OS₂, the supramol­ecular architecture is sustained by two N—H...O and three N—H...S hydrogen bonds, and by N...S electrostatic interactions. The hydrogen‐bond network generates a sheet structure, which extends in the a and b directions and is one c‐cell dimension thick. These extended sheets are then linked across inversion centres in the c direction by N...S electrostatic interactions, thus forming a three‐dimensional network. The principal intermolecular dimensions include N(H)...O distances of 2.8393 (17) and 3.0268 (16) Å, N(H)...S distances in the range 3.2896 (14)–3.5924 (16) Å and N...S distances of 3.0822 (16) Å.     

Hydro­gen bonds and C—H⃛O interactions in N‐(2‐hydroxy‐1,1‐dimethyl­ethyl)benzamide at 150 K

The title compound, C₁₁H₁₅NO₂, crystallized in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/n with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. There is a single intermolecular hydrogen bond, in which the N_donor?O_acceptor distance is 3.0374 (11) Å and the N—H?O angle is 171.0 (12)°. The single intramol­ecular hydrogen bond has an O_donor?O_acceptor distance of 2.6279 (11) Å and an O—H?O angle of 161.8 (14)°. The four leading intermolecular C—H?O interactions have H?O distances ranging from 2.52 to 2.65 (2) Å and C—H?O angles ranging from 125.2 (9) to 143°. Chains of interactions form two‐dimensional networks.     

Contrasting the supramolecular structures in the isomeric pair 5‐bromo‐3‐nitrosalicylaldehyde phenylhydrazone and 3‐bromo‐5‐nitrosalicylaldehyde phenylhydrazone

Isomeric 5‐bromo‐3‐nitrosalicylaldehyde phenylhydrazone and 3‐bromo‐5‐nitrosalicylaldehyde phenylhydrazone, C₁₃H₁₀BrN₃O₃, both crystallize with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. In both isomers, an intramolecular O—H...N hydrogen bond links the hydroxy group and the imine N atom. In the 5‐bromo‐3‐nitro isomer, there are two independent N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded chains, each molecule in the asymmetric unit forming its own chain. These chains are then linked to form a three‐dimensional framework by a combination of weak C—H...O, C—H...Br, C—H...π and π–π stacking interactions. In the 3‐bromo‐5‐nitro isomer, N—H...O hydrogen bonds link the independent molecules alternately into a zigzag chain, which is reinforced by a weak C—H...O interaction. Individual chains are linked by a C—H...Br interaction and a three‐dimensional framework is generated by π–π stacking interactions.     

The 7‐bromo derivative of 2‐amino‐2′‐deoxytubercidin fluorinated at the sugar moiety

The title compound, 2,4‐diamino‐5‐bromo‐7‐(2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐β‐d ‐arabinofuranosyl)‐7H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidine, C₁₁H₁₃BrFN₅O₃, shows two conformations of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond, with the torsion angle γ (O5′—C5′—C4′—C3′) being 170.1 (3)° for conformer 1 (occupancy 0.69) and 60.7 (7)° for conformer 2 (occupancy 0.31). The N‐glycosylic bond exhibits an anti conformation, with χ = −114.8 (4)°. The sugar pucker is N‐type (C3′‐endo; ³T₄), with P = 23.3 (4)° and τ_m = 36.5 (2)°. The compound forms a three‐dimensional network that is stabilized by several intermolecular hydrogen bonds (N—H...O, O—H...N and N—H...Br).     

7‐Amino‐1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazolo[4,5‐d]pyrimidine: an 8‐azaadenine nucleoside with the nucleobase in a syn conformation

The title compound, C₉H₁₂N₆O₃, shows a syn‐glycosylic bond orientation [χ = 64.17 (16)°]. The 2′‐deoxyfuranosyl moiety exhibits an unusual C1′‐exo–O4′‐endo (₁T⁰; S‐type) sugar pucker, with P = 111.5 (1)° and τ_m = 40.3 (1)°. The conformation at the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is +sc (gauche), with γ = 64.4 (1)°. The two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network is built from intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds. An intramolecular bifurcated hydrogen bond, with an amino N—H group as hydrogen‐bond donor and the ring and hydroxymethyl O atoms of the sugar moiety as acceptors, constrains the overall conformation of the nucleoside.     

3,6‐Bis­(4‐hydroxy­benzyl)­piperazine‐2,5‐dione

In the title compound, C₁₈H₁₆N₂O₄, the piperidine ring adopts a chair conformation, lying on an inversion centre. The 4‐hydroxy­benzyl groups are in quasi‐axial positions. A two‐dimensional network is formed through N—H?O and O—H?O intermolecular hydrogen bonds and C—H?O interactions.     

N,N′‐Diethyl‐4‐nitrobenzene‐1,3‐diamine, 2,6‐bis(ethylamino)‐3‐nitrobenzonitrile and bis(4‐ethylamino‐3‐nitrophenyl) sulfone

N,N′‐Diethyl‐4‐nitrobenzene‐1,3‐diamine, C₁₀H₁₅N₃O₂, (I), crystallizes with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit, both of which are nearly planar. The molecules differ in the conformation of the ethylamine group trans to the nitro group. Both molecules contain intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds between the adjacent amine and nitro groups and are linked into one‐dimensional chains by intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The chains are organized in layers parallel to (101) with separations of ca 3.4 Å between adjacent sheets. The packing is quite different from what was observed in isomeric 1,3‐bis(ethylamino)‐2‐nitrobenzene. 2,6‐Bis(ethylamino)‐3‐nitrobenzonitrile, C₁₁H₁₄N₄O₂, (II), differs from (I) only in the presence of the nitrile functionality between the two ethylamine groups. Compound (II) crystallizes with one unique molecule in the asymmetric unit. In contrast with (I), one of the ethylamine groups, which is disordered over two sites with occupancies of 0.75 and 0.25, is positioned so that the methyl group is directed out of the plane of the ring by approximately 85°. This ethylamine group forms an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond with the adjacent nitro group. The packing in (II) is very different from that in (I). Molecules of (II) are linked by both intermolecular amine–nitro N—H...O and amine–nitrile N—H...N hydrogen bonds into a two‐dimensional network in the (10) plane. Alternating molecules are approximately orthogonal to one another, indicating that π–π interactions are not a significant factor in the packing. Bis(4‐ethylamino‐3‐nitrophenyl) sulfone, C₁₆H₁₈N₄O₆S, (III), contains the same ortho nitro/ethylamine pairing as in (I), with the position para to the nitro group occupied by the sulfone instead of a second ethylamine group. Each 4‐ethylamino‐3‐nitrobenzene moiety is nearly planar and contains the typical intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond. Due to the tetrahedral geometry about the S atom, the molecules of (III) adopt an overall V shape. There are no intermolecular amine–nitro hydrogen bonds. Rather, each amine H atom has a long (H...O ca 2.8 Å) interaction with one of the sulfone O atoms. Molecules of (III) are thus linked by amine–sulfone N—H...O hydrogen bonds into zigzag double chains running along [001]. Taken together, these structures demonstrate that small changes in the functionalization of ethylamine–nitroarenes cause significant differences in the intermolecular interactions and packing.     

catena‐Poly[[bis(acetonitrile‐κN)manganese(II)]‐bis(μ‐trifluoromethanesulfonato‐κ2O:O′)]

The title compound, [Mn(CF₃SO₃)₂(CH₃CN)₂]_n, has an Mn^II cation on an inversion centre in an octahedral environment. The trifluoromethanesulfonate anions act as bridging ligands and form a one‐dimensional coordination polymer in the direction of the a axis. The F atoms of the trifluoromethanesulfonate anions form layers parallel to the ab plane, but despite short intermolecular distances, no stabilizing F...F interactions are detected. The Mn—N and C—C bonds of the acetonitrile ligand are analyzed according to the Hirshfeld rigid‐bond test. Renninger effects in the reflection data are considered, explored and discussed.     

The diastereoisomers 2‐[(S/R)‐2‐chloro‐3‐quinolyl]‐2‐[(R)‐1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)ethylamino]acetonitrile at 100 K

In the structures of the two enantiopure diastereoisomers of the title compound, C₂₀H₁₈ClN₃O, which crystallize in different space groups, the molecules are very similar as far as bond distances and angles are concerned, but more substantial differences are observed in some torsion angles. The crystal structures of both molecules can be described as zigzag layers along the c axis. The packing is stabilized by hydrogen‐bond interactions of N—H...O, C—H...Cl and C—H...π types for 2‐[(R)‐2‐chloro‐3‐quinolyl]‐2‐[(R)‐1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)ethylamino]acetonitrile, and of N—H...N, C—H...O and C—H...π types for 2‐[(S)‐2‐chloro‐3‐quinolyl]‐2‐[(R)‐1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)ethylamino]acetonitrile, resulting in the formation of two‐ and three‐dimensional networks.