Attempted Reduction of Divalent Rare Earth Iodo Aminopyridinates

Rare examples of amido‐iodo complexes of selected divalent lanthanides can be synthesized by using deprotonated Ap*H {Ap*H = 2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)‐[6‐(2,4,6‐triisopropylphenyl)‐pyridin‐2‐yl]‐amine} as a stabilizing ligand. Reaction of [Ap*K]_n with [LnI₂(thf)_n] (Ln = Eu, Yb, n = 4,5) in THF leads to [Ln(Ap*)I(thf)₂]₂ (Ln = Eu, Yb). An attempted reduction of these divalent heteroleptic complexes with KC₈ to synthesize complexes containing an unsupported Ln–Ln bond resulted in the formation of [Ln(Ap*)₂(thf)₂]. These lanthanide complexes were characterized by X‐ray structure analysis.     

Weak Ligand‐Field Effect from Ancillary Ligands on Enhancing Single‐Ion Magnet Performance

A series of bis‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl‐supported Dy complexes containing different ancillary ligands were synthesized and characterized. Magnetic studies showed that 1 Dy [Cp*₂DyCl(THF)], 1 Dy’ [Cp*₂DyCl₂K(THF)]_n, 2 Dy [Cp*₂DyBr(THF)], 3 Dy [Cp*₂DyI(THF)] and 4 Dy [Cp*₂DyTp] (Tp=hydrotris(1‐pyrazolyl)borate) were single‐ion magnets (SIMs). The 1D dysprosium chain 1 Dy’ exhibited a hysteresis at up to 5 K. Furthermore, 3 Dy featured the highest energy barrier (419 cm^?1) among the complexes. The effects of ancillary ligands on single‐ion magnetic properties were studied by experimental, ab initio calculations and electrostatic analysis methods in detail. These results demonstrated that the QTM rate was strongly dependent on the ancillary ligands and that a weak equatorial ligand field could be beneficial for constructing Dy‐SIMs.     

New Routes to a Series of σ‐Borane/Borate Complexes of Molybdenum and Ruthenium

A series of agostic σ‐borane/borate complexes have been synthesized and structurally characterized from simple borane adducts. A room‐temperature reaction of [Cp*Mo(CO)₃Me], 1 with Li[BH₃(EPh)] (Cp*=pentamethylcyclopentadienyl, E=S, Se, Te) yielded hydroborate complexes [Cp*Mo(CO)₂(μ‐H)BH₂EPh] in good yields. With 2‐mercapto‐benzothiazole, an N,S‐carbene‐anchored σ‐borate complex [Cp*Mo(CO)₂BH₃(1‐benzothiazol‐2‐ylidene)] ( 5 ) was isolated. Further, a transmetalation of the B‐agostic ruthenium complex [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BHL₂] ( 6 , L=C₇H₄NS₂) with [Mn₂(CO)₁₀] affords a new B‐agostic complex, [Mn(CO)₃(μ‐H)BHL₂] ( 7 ) with the same structural motif in which the central metal is replaced by an isolobal and isoelectronic [Mn(CO)₃] unit. Natural‐bond‐orbital analyses of 5–7 indicate significant delocalization of the electron density from the filled σ_B?H orbital to the vacant metal orbital.     

Synthesis,Structures and Magnetic Properties of Cyano‐bridged FeIII/MnIII Heterobimetallic 1D Chain Complexes

Using the tricyanometalate building block, (nBu₄N)[(Tp*)Fe(CN)₃] [Bu₄N⁺ = tetrabutylammonium cation; Tp*^– = hydrotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl)borate], and bidentate Schiff base ligands, HL1 or HL2 {HL1 = 2‐[[(2‐phenylethyl)imino]methyl]phenol; HL2 = 4‐methoxy‐2‐[[(2‐phenylethyl)imino]methyl]phenol}, two heterobimetallic one‐dimensional (1D) chain complexes, [Mn(L1)₂Fe(Tp*)(CN)₃]_n ( 1 ) and [Mn(L2)₂Fe(Tp*)(CN)₃]_n ( 2 ), were synthesized. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction reveal the formation of neutral cyano‐bridged zigzag single chains in 1 and 2 . Magnetic studies demonstrate that both complexes show ferromagnetic interactions between central Fe^III and Mn^III atoms.     

Synthesis and reactivity of naphthalene sandwich complexes of molybdenum. X-ray structure of [Mo(η6-naphthalene) {P(OMe)3}3] and [Mo(H)(η6-naphthalene){P(OMe)3}3][BF4]

The sandwich complexes bis(η⁶-naphthalene)molybdenum(0) ( 1 ), bis(η⁶-1-methylnaphthalene)molybdenum(0) ( 2 ), and bis(η⁶-1,4-dimethylnaphthalene)molybdenum(0) ( 3 ) are synthesized by cocondensation of Mo-atoms with the naphthalene ligands. Complexes 1–3 are also obtained by reduction of MoCl₅ or MoCl₄. 2THF with highly activated Mg in the presence of the naphthalene ligands. Mg was activated by sublimation of the metal in a simple rotating solution reactor. Complex 2 exists as a mixture of regio- and stereoisomers. Three regioisomers, 3a–c , are formed in reactions of Mo-atoms with 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene, whereas 3a , the isomer with the Mo-atom coordinated to the unsubstituted rings, is formed selectively via the reductive method. The ligands in 1–3 are highly labile. CO displaces both naphthalene rings in 2 and 3 to give [Mo(CO)₆], while PF₃, P(OMe)₃, and PMe₃ displace only one coordinated naphthalene in 1 to yield the [Mo(η⁶-naphthalene)L₃] complexes 4–6 . In toluene, arene exchange is a competitive process in reactions of 1 with PF₃. Complexes 5 (L = P(OMe)₃) and 6 (L = PMe₃) react with HBF₄ to give the cationic metal hydride complexes 8 and 9 . The X-ray crystal structures of [Mo(η⁶-naphthalene) {P(OMe)₃}₃] ( 5 ) and [Mo(H)(η⁶-naphthalene) {P(OMe)₃}₃][BF₄] ( 8 ) are reported.     

Tris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)methane‐Based Heterobimetallic Complexes that Contain Zn and CdTransition‐Metal Bonds: Synthesis,Structures, and Quantum Chemical Calculations

Reactions of the tris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)methanide amido complexes [M′{C(3,5‐Me₂pz)₃}{N(SiMe₃)₂}] (M′=Mg ( 1 a ), Zn ( 1 b ), Cd ( 1 c ); 3,5‐Me₂pz=3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl) with two equivalents of the acidic Group 6 cyclopentadienyl (Cp) tricarbonyl hydrides [MCp(CO)₃H] (M=Cr ( 2 a ), Mo ( 2 b )) gave different types of heterobimetallic complex. In each case, two reactions took place, namely the conversion of the tris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)methanide ligand (Tpmd*) into the ‐methane derivative (Tpm*) and the reaction of the acidic hydride M?H bond with the M′?N(SiMe₃)₂ moiety. The latter produces HN(SiMe₃)₂ as a byproduct. The Group 2 representatives [Mg(Tpm*){MCp(CO)₃}₂(thf)] ( 3 a / b ) form isocarbonyl bridges between the magnesium and chromium/molybdenum centres, whereas direct metal–metal bonds are formed in the case of the ions [Zn(Tpm*){MCp(CO)₃}]⁺ ( 4 a / b ; [MCp(CO)₃]^? as the counteranion) and [Cd(Tpm*){MCp(CO)₃}(thf)]⁺ ( 5 a / b ; [Cd{MCp(CO)₃}₃]^? as the counteranion). Complexes 4 a and 5 a / b are the first complexes that contain Zn?Cr, Cd?Cr, and Cd?Mo bonds (bond lengths 251.6, 269.8, and 278.9 pm, respectively). Quantum chemical calculations on 4 a / b* (and also on 5 a / b* ) provide evidence for an interaction between the metal atoms.     

Aluminum Complexes Stabilized by Piperazidine‐Bridged Bis(phenolate) Ligands: Syntheses,Structures, and Application in the Ring‐Opening Polymerization of ε‐Caprolactone

The synthesis and characterization of aluminum alkoxide and alkyl complexes stabilized by piperazidine‐bridged bis(phenolate) ligands are described. Treatment of ligand precursors H₂[ONNO]¹ {H₂[ONNO]¹=1,4‐bis(2‐hydroxy‐3‐tert‐butyl‐5‐methylbenzyl)piperazidine} and H₂[ONNO]² {H₂[ONNO]²=1,4‐bis(2‐hydroxy‐3,5‐di‐tert‐butylbenzyl)piperazidine} with AlEt₂(OCH₂Ph) and AlEt₂(OPr‐i), which were generated in situ by the reactions of AlEt₃ with equivalent of the corresponding alcohols, in a 1:1 molar ratio in THF gave the corresponding aluminum alkoxide complexes [ONNO]¹Al(OCH₂Ph) ( 1 ) and [ONNO]²Al(OPr‐i) ( 2 ), respectively. The reaction of H₂[ONNO]¹ with AlEt₂(OCH₂Ph) in a 1:2 molar ratio in THF afforded a mixture of monometallic aluminum ethyl complex [ONNO]¹AlEt ( 3 ) and complex 1 , which can be isolated by stepwise crystallization. Similarly, H₂[ONNO]² reacted with AlEt₂(OPr‐i) in a 1:2 molar ratio in THF to give a mixture of aluminum ethyl complex [ONNO]²AlEt ( 4 ) and complex 2 . Complexes 1 and 2 were also available via treatment of complexes 3 and 4 with 1 equiv. of benzyl alcohol and isopropyl alcohol, respectively. All of these complexes were fully characterized including X‐ray structural determination. It was found that complexes 1 to 4 can initiate the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone, and complexes 1 and 2 showed higher catalytic activity in comparison with complexes 3 and 4 .     

Unprecedentedly High Formic Acid Dehydrogenation Activity on an Iridium Complex with an N,N′‐Diimine Ligand in Water

Hydrogen production from the dehydrogenation of formic acid (FA) is promising. Most of the current catalysts for FA dehydrogenation are effective only in the presence of bases or additives. We report here newly developed iridium complexes containing conjugated N,N′‐diimine ligands for FA dehydrogenation in water without the addition of bases or additives. A turnover frequency (TOF) of 487 500 h^?1 with [Cp*Ir( L1 )Cl]Cl ( L1 =2,2′‐bi‐2‐imidazoline) at 90 °C and a turnover number (TON) of 2 400 000 with in situ prepared catalyst from [IrCp*Cl₂]₂ and 2,2′‐bi‐1,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidine ( L2 ) at 80 °C were obtained, the highest values reported for FA dehydrogenation to date. A mechanistic study reveals that the formation of [Ir‐H] intermediate species is the rate‐determining step in the catalytic cycle.     

Hydrido(hydrosilylene)tungsten Complexes: Dynamic Behavior and Reactivity Toward Acetone

Reaction of a labile tungsten nitrile complex, [(Cp*)W(CO)₂(NCMe)Me] (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅), with H₃SiC(SiMe₃)₃ gave the hydrido(hydrosilylene) complex [(Cp*)(CO)₂(H)W?Si(H){C(SiMe₃)₃}] ( 1a ). The hydrido(silylene) complex [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄Et)(CO)₂(H)W?SiMes₂] ( 2 ) (Mes=2,4,6‐Me‐C₆H₂) was synthesized by a similar reaction with H₂SiMes₂. There is a strong interligand interaction between the hydrido and silylene ligands of these complexes; this was confirmed by a neutron diffraction study of [D₂] 1b , that is, the deuterido and η⁵‐C₅Me₄Et derivative of 1a . The exchange between the W? H and the Si? D groups was observed in the deuterido complex [D] 1a . This H/D exchange proceeded slowly at room temperature, but very rapidly under UV irradiation. Variable‐temperature NMR spectroscopy measurements show the dynamic behavior of carbonyl ligands in 1a . Complex 1a reacted with acetone at room temperature to give mainly a hydrosilylation product, [(Cp*)(CO)₂(H)W?Si(OiPr){C(SiMe₃)₃}] ( 3a ), along with a siloxy complex, [(Cp*)(CO)₂WO(Si(H)iPr{C(SiMe₃)₃})] ( 4a ). At low temperature, a different reaction, namely, α‐H abstraction, proceeded to give an equilibrium mixture of 1a and a dihydrido(silyl) complex, [(Cp*)(CO)₂(H)₂W(Si(H){OC(?CH₂)Me}{C(SiMe₃)₃})] ( 5 ).     

Synthesis and Structures of Bis(alkene) Complexes of Tungsten and Molybdenum, [M(CO)2(dpphen)(dbf)2] (M = W or Mo; dpphen = 4,7‐diphenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline; dbf = dibutylfumarate)

Tungsten and molybdenum complexes [M(CO)₂(dpphen)(dbf)₂] (M = W 1 or Mo 2 ; dpphen = 4,7‐diphenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline; dbf = dibutylfumarate) have been synthesized and structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction analysis. In both complexes which have similar structure, the metal atom co‐ordination is distorted octahedral with dpphen and two CO groups in the equatorial plane and the metal atom binds in an η²‐fashion to the C–C bonds of two dbf ligands. The two C–C bonds are almost mutually orthogonal. The two complexes are different in conformation which result from face selection of the two dbf ligands for coordination to the metal atom.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of the Molybdenum(II) Complexes with the N,N‐dimethylthiocarbamoyl Containing Ligand: Crystal Structures of β [Mo(CO)2{η2‐S2P(OEt)2}(η2‐SCNMe2)(PPh3)] and [Mo(CO)2(η3‐Tp)(η2‐SCNMe2)(PPh3)]

Reactions of the thiocarbamoyl‐molybdenum complex [Mo(CO)₂(η²‐SCNMe₂)(PPh₃)₂Cl] 1 , and ammonium diethyldithiophosphate, NH₄S₂P(OEt)₂, and potassium tris(pyrazoyl‐1‐yl)borate, KTp, in dichloromethane at room temperature yielded the seven coordinated diethyldithiophosphate thiocarbamoyl‐molybdenum complexe [Mo(CO)₂{η²‐S₂P(OEt)₂}(η²‐SCNMe₂)(PPh₃)] β‐3 , and tris(pyrazoyl‐1‐yl)borate thiocabamoyl‐molybdenum complex [Mo(CO)₂(η³‐Tp)(η²‐SCNMe₂)(PPh₃)] 4 , respectively. The geometry around the metal atom of compounds β‐3 and 4 are capped octahedrons. The α‐ and β‐isomers are defined to the dithio‐ligand and one of the carbonyl ligands in the trans position in former and two carbonyl ligands in the trans position in later. The thiocabamoyl and diethyldithiophosphate or tris(pyrazoyl‐1‐yl)borate ligands coordinate to the molybdenum metal center through the carbon and sulfur and two sulfur atoms, or three nitrogen atoms, respectively. Complexes β‐3 and 4 are characterized by X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

New Heteronuclear Bridged Borylene Complexes That Were Derived from [{Cp*CoCl}2] and Mono‐Metal?Carbonyl Fragments

The synthesis, structural characterization, and reactivity of new bridged borylene complexes are reported. The reaction of [{Cp*CoCl}₂] with LiBH₄ ? THF at ?70 °C, followed by treatment with [M(CO)₃(MeCN)₃] (M=W, Mo, and Cr) under mild conditions, yielded heteronuclear triply bridged borylene complexes, [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)M(CO)₅] ( 1 – 3 ; 1 : M=W, 2 : M=Mo, 3 : M=Cr). During the syntheses of complexes 1 – 3 , capped‐octahedral cluster [(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐H)(BH)₄{Co(CO)₂}] ( 4 ) was also isolated in good yield. Complexes 1 – 3 are isoelectronic and isostructural to [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO){Fe(CO)₃}] ( 5 ) and [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐CO){Mn(CO)₃}] ( 6 ), with a trigonal‐pyramidal geometry in which the μ₃‐BH ligand occupies the apical vertex. To test the reactivity of these borylene complexes towards bis‐phosphine ligands, the room‐temperature photolysis of complexes 1 – 3 , 5 , 6 , and [{(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Ru)Fe(CO)₃}₂(μ‐CO)] ( 7 ) was carried out. Most of these complexes led to decomposition, although photolysis of complex 7 with [Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂] (n=1–3) yielded complexes 9 – 11 , [3,4‐(Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂)‐closo‐1,2,3,4‐Ru₂Fe₂(BH)₂] ( 9 : n=1, 10 : n=2, 11 : n=3). Quantum‐chemical calculations by using DFT methods were carried out on compounds 1 – 3 and 9 – 11 and showed reasonable agreement with the experimentally obtained structural parameters, that is, large HOMO–LUMO gaps, in accordance with the high stabilities of these complexes, and NMR chemical shifts that accurately reflected the experimentally observed resonances. All of the new compounds were characterized in solution by using mass spectrometry, IR spectroscopy, and ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹¹B NMR spectroscopy and their structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of complexes 1 , 2 , 4 , 9 , and 10 .     

Mesityl‐phenolato‐vanadium(III)‐Komplexe: Synthese,Struktur und Verhalten

Mesityl‐vanadium(III)‐phenolate Complexes: Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity Protolysis reactions of [VMes₃(THF)] with ortho‐substituted phenols (2‐iso‐propyl‐(H–IPP), 2‐tert‐butyl(H–TBP), 2,4,6‐trimethylphenol (HOMes) and 2,2′biphenol (H₂–Biphen) yield the partially and fully phenolate substituted complexes [VMes(OAr)₂(THF)₂] (OAr = IPP ( 1 ), TBP ( 2 )), [VMes₂(OMes)(THF)] ( 4 ), [V(OAr)₃(THF)₂] (OAr = TBP ( 3 ), OMes ( 5 )), and [V₂(Biphen)₃(THF)₄] ( 6 ). Treatment of 6 with Li₂Biphen(Et₂O)₄ results in formation of [{Li(OEt₂)}₃V(Biphen)₃] ( 7 ) and with MesLi complexes [{Li(THF)₂}₂VMes(Biphen)₂] · THF ( 8 ) and [{Li(DME)}VMes₂(Biphen)] ( 9 ) are formed. Reacting [VCl₃(THF)₃] with LiOMes in 1 : 1 to 1 : 4 ratios yields the componds [VCl_3–n(OMes)_n(THF)₂] (n = 1 ( 5 b ), 2 ( 5 a ), 3 ( 5 )) and [{Li(DME)₂}V(OMes)₄] ( 5 c ), the latter showing thermochromism due to a complexation/decomplexation equilibrium of the solvated cation. The mixed ligand mesityl phenolate complexes [{Li(DME)_n}{VMes₂(OAr)₂}] (OAr = IPP ( 10 ), TBP ( 11 ), OMes ( 12 ) (n = 2 or 3) and [{Li(DME)₂}{VMes(OMes)₃}] ( 15 ) are obtained by reaction of 1 , 2 , 5 a and 5 with MesLi. With [{Li(DME)₂(THF)}{VMes₃(IPP)}] ( 13 ) a ligand exchange product of 10 was isolated. Addition of LiOMes to [VMes₃(THF)] forming [Li(THF)₄][VMes₃(OMes)] ( 14 ) completes the series of [Li(solv.)_x][VMes_4–n(OMes)_n] (n = 1 to 4) complexes which have been oxidised to their corresponding neutral [VMes_4–n(OMes)_n] derivatives 16 to 19 by reaction with p‐chloranile. They were investigated by epr spectroscopy. The molecular structures of 1 , 3 , 5 , 5 a , 5 a – Br , 7 , 10 and 13 have been determined by X‐ray analysis. In 1 (monoclinic, C2/c, a = 29.566(3) Å, b = 14.562(2) Å, c = 15.313(1) Å, β = 100.21(1)°, Z = 8), 3 (orthorhombic, Pbcn, a = 28.119(5) Å, b = 14.549(3) Å, c = 17.784(4) Å, β = 90.00°, Z = 8), ( 5 ) (triclinic, P1, a = 8.868(1) Å, b = 14.520(3) Å, c = 14.664(3) Å, α = 111.44(1)°, β = 96.33(1)°, γ = 102.86(1)°, Z = 2), 5 a (monoclinic, P2₁/c, a = 20.451(2) Å, b = 8.198(1) Å, c = 15.790(2) Å, β = 103.38(1)°, Z = 4) and 5 a – Br (monoclinic, P2₁/c, a = 21.264(3) Å, b = 8.242(4) Å, c = 15.950(2) Å, β = 109.14(1)°, Z = 4) the vanadium atoms are coordinated trigonal bipyramidal with the THF molecules in the axial positions. The central atom in 7 (trigonal, P3c1, a = 20.500(3) Å, b = 20.500(3) Å, c = 18.658(4) Å, Z = 6) has an octahedral environment. The three Li(OEt₂)⁺ fragments are bound bridging the biphenolate ligands. The structures of 10 (monoclinic, P2₁/c, a = 16.894(3) Å, b = 12.181(2) Å, c = 25.180(3) Å, β = 91.52(1)°, Z = 4) and 13 (orthorhombic, Pna2₁, a = 16.152(4) Å, b = 17.293(6) Å, c = 16.530(7) Å, Z = 4) are characterised by separated ions with tetrahedrally coordinated vanadate(III) anions and the lithium cations being the centres of octahedral and trigonal bipyramidal solvent environments, respectively.     

Synthesis of ferrocene‐containing N‐aryloxo β‐ketoiminate lanthanide complexes and polymerization of ε‐caprolactone

The synthesis, characterization and ε‐caprolactone polymerization behavior of lanthanide amido complexes stabilized by ferrocene‐containing N‐aryloxo functionalized β‐ketoiminate ligand FcCOCH₂C(Me)N(2‐HO‐5‐Bu^t‐C₆H₃) (LH₂, Fc = ferrocenyl) are described. The lanthanide amido complexes [LLnN(SiMe₃)₂(THF)]₂ [Ln = Nd ( 1 ), Sm ( 2 ), Yb ( 3 ), Y ( 4 )] were synthesized in good yields by the amine elimination reactions of LH₂ with Ln[N(SiMe₃)₂]₃(µ‐Cl)Li(THF)₃ in a 1:1 molar ratio in THF. These complexes were characterized by IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy was added for the analysis of complex 4 . The definitive molecular structures of complexes 1 and 3 were determined by X‐ray diffraction studies. Complexes 1 – 4 can initiate the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone with moderate activity. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Concurrent Stabilization of π‐Donor and π‐Acceptor Ligands in Aromatized and Dearomatized Pincer [(PNN)Re(CO)(O)2] Complexes

Aromatized cationic [(PNN)Re(π acid)(O)₂]⁺ ( 1 ) and dearomatized neutral [(PNN*)Re(π acid)(O)₂] ( 2 ) complexes (where π acid=CO ( a ), tBuNC ( b ), or (2,6‐Me₂)PhNC ( c )), possessing both π‐donor and π‐acceptor ligands, have been synthesized and fully characterized. Reaction of [(PNN)Re(O)₂]⁺ ( 4 ) with lithiumhexamethyldisilazide (LiHMDS) yield the dearomatized [(PNN*)Re(O)₂] ( 3 ). Complexes 1 and 2 are prepared from the reaction of 4 and 3 , respectively, with CO or isocyanides. Single‐crystal X‐ray structures of 1 a and 1 b show the expected trans‐dioxo structure, in which the oxo ligands occupy the axial positions and the π‐acidic ligand occupies the equatorial plane in an overall octahedral geometry about the rhenium(V) center. DFT studies revealed the stability of complexes 1 and 2 arises from a π‐backbonding interaction between the d_xy orbital of rhenium, the π orbital of the oxo ligands, and the π* orbital of CO/isocyanide.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of [(1‐(Phenyltriazenido)‐2‐(phenyltriazeno)benzene)(nitrato)mercury(II)], {Hg[PhN3C6H4N3(H)Ph](NO3)}, a Complex with Weak Metal‐Arene π‐Interactions

The reaction of PhN₃(H)C₆H₄N₃(H)Ph with Hg(NO₃)₂ in THF in the presence of triethylamine yields {Hg[PhN₃C₆H₄N₃(H)Ph](NO₃)} as a yellow powder that can be recrystallized from THF/acetone. The crystals belong to the monoclinic system, space group P2₁ with the cell dimensions a = 9.639(2), b = 5.412(1), c = 19.675(4) Å, β= 97.47(3)°, V = 1017.7 (4) ų, Z = 2. The crystal structure determination (2668 unique reflections with [I>2σ(I)], 262 parameters, R₁ = 0.0393) shows that the structure consists of mononuclear complexes. Hg atoms are linearly coordinated by one N_α atom of the triazenide unit of the planar ligand [Hg‐N(1) = 2.101(8) Å] and an O atom of the NO₃^— ion [Hg‐O(1) = 2.11(1) Å]. Additional weak Hg‐N contacts [Hg‐N(4) = 2.662(9) and Hg‐N(3) = 2.851(9) Å] and an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the triazenide hydrogen and an O atom of the nitrate group are observed [N(6)‐H(6)···O(2) = 2.92(2) Å]. The complexes are stacked to infinite chains by metal‐arene π‐interactions. Each Hg atom is coordinated by the terminal phenyl rings of two neighboring complexes [Hg‐C from 3.40(1) to 4.10(1) Å] in a η² fashion.     

Interaction between Anions and Molybdenum Allyl Dicarbonyl Complexes of 1,4,7‐Trithiacyclononane

The labile complex [MoCl(η³‐methallyl)(CO)₂(NCMe)₂] reacts with the ligand 1,4,7‐trithiacyclononane ([9]aneS₃) and the salt NaBAr′₄ to afford [Mo(η³‐methallyl)(CO)₂([9]aneS₃)][BAr′₄] ( 1?BAr′₄ ). An analogous reaction of [MoBr(η³‐allyl)(CO)₂(NCMe)₂] yields [Mo(η³‐allyl)(CO)₂([9]aneS₃)][BAr′₄] ( 2?BAr′₄ ). The new compounds 1?BAr′₄ and 2?BAr′₄ were characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopic analysis and X‐ray diffraction studies. Both compounds feature the cyclic thioether [9]aneS₃ coordinated as a tridentate ligand to the molybdenum center. The allyl ligand in 2?BAr′₄ is aligned with the middle of the OC‐Mo‐CO angle, which is acute. Both of these features are typical of most pseudo‐octahedral allyl dicarbonyl molybdenum complexes. In contrast, the allyl group is rotated in 1?BAr′₄ , which is attributed to steric hindrance between the methyl substituent and the ligated thioether, and the OC‐Mo‐CO angle is obtuse. Compound 1?BAr′₄ undergoes rapid substitution of [9]aneS₃ by either chloride and fluoride ions in dichloromethane, and the products include the known species [{Mo(η³‐methallyl)(CO)₂}₂(μ‐Cl)₃]^? and a structurally similar new anionic complex with two fluoro and one hydroxo bridging ligands, respectively. Stable supramolecular adducts were formed in the reactions of 1?BAr′₄ and 2?BAr₄ with bromide, iodide, hydrogensulfate, and methanesulfonate compounds. The binding constants of these adducts in dichloromethane were calculated from ¹H NMR spectroscopic titration data, and the solid‐state structures of the 1?Br , 1?HSO₄ , 1?I , and 2?I adducts were determined by X‐ray diffraction studies. The surprising slightly higher stability of the iodide adduct relative to that of bromide was investigated theoretically, with the results pointing to an effect of the differential solvation of the halide ions.     

Syntheses,Structures, and Electronic Properties of Mono- and Bimetallic Thiolato Complexes Containing Unusual Coordination Modes of Thiolato Ligands

Synthesis, bonding and chemistry of mono- and bimetallic complexes supported by chelating thiolato ligands have been established. Treatment of [Cp*VCl₂]₃ ( 1 ) with [LiBH₄ ⋅ THF] followed by the addition of ethane-1,2-dithiol led to the formation of an EPR active bimetallic vanadium thiolato complex [(Cp*V){μ-(SCH₂CH₂S)-κ²S,S′)₂{V(SCH₂CH₂S-SH)}] ( 2 ). In complex 2 , two ethane-1,2-dithiolato ligands are symmetrically coordinated to two vanadium atoms through μ-S atoms. Interestingly, when similar reactions were carried out with heavier group 5 metal precursors, such as [Cp*NbCl₄] ( 3 a ), it afforded monometallic thiolato complex [Cp*Nb(SCH₂CH₂S)(SCH₂CH₂S−CH₂S)] ( 4 a ). On the other hand, the Ta-analogue [Cp*TaCl₄] ( 3 b ) yielded thiolato species [Cp*Ta(SCH₂CH₂S)(SCH₂CH₂S−CH₂S)] ( 4 b ) and [Cp*Ta(SCH₂CH₂S) (SCH₂CH₂S−S)] ( 5 ). In complexes 4 a and 4 b , one ethane-1,2-dithiolato and one trithiolato ligand are coordinated to Nb and Ta centers, respectively. Whereas, in complex 5 , one ethane-1,2-dithiolato and one 2-disulfanylethanethiolato is coordinated to the Ta center. Moreover, the photolytic reaction of 5 with [Mo(CO)₅ ⋅ THF] yielded heterobimetallic thiolato complex [(Cp*Ta){μ-(SCH₂CH₂S)-κ²S,S′}{μ-(SCH₂CH₂S−CH₂(CH₃)S)κ²S′′ : κ¹S-′′′′ : κ¹S′′′′′}{Mo(CO)₃}] ( 6 ). All the complexes have been characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. Further, computational analyses were performed to provide an insight into the bonding of these complexes.     

Zur Reaktivität von Titanocenkomplexen [Ti(Cp′)2(η2‐Me3SiC≡CSiMe3)] (Cp′ = Cp,Cp*) gegenüber Benzoldicarbonsäuren

On the Reactivity of Titanocene Complexes [Ti(Cp′)₂(η²‐Me₃SiC≡CSiMe₃)] (Cp′ = Cp, Cp*) towards Benzenedicarboxylic Acids Titanocene complexes [Ti(Cp′)₂(BTMSA)] ( 1a , Cp′ = Cp = η⁵‐C₅H₅; 1b , Cp′ = Cp* = η⁵‐C₅Me₅; BTMSA = Me₃SiC≡CSiMe₃) were found to react with iodine and methyl iodide yielding [Ti(Cp′)₂(μ‐I)₂] ( 2a / b ; a refers to Cp′ = Cp and b to Cp′ = Cp*), [Ti(Cp′)₂I₂] ( 3a / b ) and [Ti(Cp′)₂(Me)I] ( 4a / b ), respectively. In contrast to 2a , complex 2b proved to be highly moisture sensitive yielding with cleavage of HCp* [{Ti(Cp*)I}₂(μ‐O)] ( 7 ). The corresponding reactions of 1a / b with p‐cresol and thiophenol resulted in the formation of [Ti(Cp′)₂{O(p‐Tol)}₂] ( 5a / b ) and [Ti(Cp′)₂(SPh)₂] ( 6a / b ), respectively. Reactions of 1a and 1b with 1,n‐benzenedicarboxylic acids (n = 2–4) resulted in the formation of dinuclear titanium(III) complexes of the type [{Ti(Cp′)₂}₂{μ‐1,n‐(O₂C)₂C₆H₄}] (n = 2, 8a / b ; n = 3, 9a / b ; n = 4, 10a / b ). All complexes were fully characterized analytically and spectroscopically. Furthermore, complexes 7 , 8b , 9a ·THF, 10a / b were also be characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

Magnetic Ordering in Iron(II) Complexes due to a 2D Network of Hydrogen Bonds

The magnetic properties of two octahedral iron(II) complexes with Schiff base like equatorial N₂O₂ coordinating ligands and methanol (MeOH) as axial ligand are reported. Both compounds [FeL1(MeOH)₂] ( 1 ) and [FeL2(MeOH)₂] ( 2 ) (with L1 = [3,3′]‐[1,2‐phenylenebis(iminomethylidyne)‐bis(2,4‐pentanedionato)(2‐)‐N,N′,O²,O²′] and L2 = [E,E]‐[{diethyl 2,2′‐1,2‐phenylenebis(iminomethylidyne)bis(3‐oxo‐3‐phenylpropanato)} (2‐)‐N,N′,O3,O3′]) show a weak spontaneous magnetization below T_C = 10 K. Results from X‐ray structure analysis of 1 indicate, that this is due to 2D network of hydrogen bonds as previously discussed for a similar complex.