Cube roots of integers. A conjecture about Heron's method in Metrika III. 20

Did Heron (or his teachers) use sequences of differences to find an approximate value of the cube root of an integer? I venture a conjecture of his heuristics and a couple of possible mathematical proofs of his method.     

Mehmet Nadir: An amateur mathematician in Ottoman Turkey

This note summarizes the results of a recent survey of all the mathematical work of Mehmet Nadir, a Turkish amateur mathematician and professional educator who lived from 1856 to 1927 during the last years of the Ottoman Empire and the first years of the Turkish Republic. It is shown that, although working in isolated and adverse conditions, Nadir was able to establish a continuous correspondence with mathematicians in western Europe and, through his studies in number theory, obtained some results of lasting value.     

Convergence and formal manipulation in the theory of series from 1730 to 1815

In the early calculus mathematicians used convergent series to represent geometrical quantities and solve geometrical problems. However, series were also manipulated formally using procedures that were the infinitary extension of finite procedures. By the 1720s results were being published that could not be reduced to the original conceptions of convergence and geometrical representation. This situation led Euler to develop explicitly a more formal approach which generalized the early theory. Formal analysis, which was predominant during the second half of the 18th century despite criticisms of it by some researchers, contributed to the enlargement of mathematics and even led to a new branch of analysis: the calculus of operations. However, formal methods could not give an adequate treatment of trigonometric series and series that were not the expansions of elementary functions. The need to use trigonometric series and introduce nonelementary functions led Fourier and Gauss to reject the formal concept of series and adopt a different, purely quantitative notion of series.     

Leonhard Euler’s use and understanding of mathematical transcendence

Leonhard Euler primarily applied the term “transcendental” to quantities which could be variable or determined. Analyzing Euler’s use and understanding of mathematical transcendence as applied to operations, functions, progressions, and determined quantities as well as the eighteenth century practice of definition allows the author to evaluate claims that Euler provided the first modern definition of a transcendental number. The author argues that Euler’s informal and pragmatic use of mathematical transcendence highlights the general nature of eighteenth century mathematics and proposes an alternate perspective on the issue at hand: transcendental numbers inherited their transcendental classification from functions.     

Algebra and geometry in Pietro Mengoli (1625–1686)

An important step in 17th-century research on quadratures involved the use of algebraic procedures. Pietro Mengoli (1625–1686), probably the most original student of Bonaventura Cavalieri (1598–1647), was one of several scholars who developed such procedures. Algebra and geometry are closely related in his works, particularly in Geometriae Speciosae Elementa   [Bologna, 1659]. Mengoli considered curves determined by equations that are now represented by y=K⋅xm⋅n(t−x)$y=K\cdot x^m\cdot {(t-x)}^n$. This paper analyzes the interrelation between algebra and geometry in this work, showing the complementary nature of the two disciplines and how their combination allowed Mengoli to calculate quadratures in a new way.     

Cristoforo Borri and the epistemological status of mathematics in seventeenth-century Portugal

This paper argues that the epistemological promotion of mathematics by the Jesuit Cristoforo Borri, while he was teaching at the Coimbra Jesuit College in the late 1620s, played a decisive role in the updating of cosmological ideas in 17th-century Portugal. The paper focuses on Borri's position on the celebrated quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum and on his understanding of the classification of sciences. It argues that by conferring on mathematics the status of Aristotelian causal science, Borri made it possible to integrate mathematical data into the philosophical debate, particularly with regard to the new cosmology.     

Non-Classical Stems from Classical: N. A. Vasiliev’s Approach to Logic and his Reassessment of the Square of Opposition

In the XIXth century there was a persistent opposition to Aristotelian logic. Nicolai A. Vasiliev (1880–1940) noted this opposition and stressed that the way for the novel – non-Aristotelian – logic was already paved. He made an attempt to construct non-Aristotelian logic (1910) within, so to speak, the form (but not in the spirit) of the Aristotelian paradigm (mode of reasoning). What reasons forced him to reassess the status of particular propositions and to replace the square of opposition by the triangle of opposition? What arguments did Vasiliev use for the introduction of new classes of propositions and statement of existence of various levels in logic? What was the meaning and role of the “method of Lobachevsky” which was implemented in construction of imaginary logic? Why did psychologism in the case of Vasiliev happen to be an important factor in the composition of the new ‘imaginary’ logic, as he called it?      

Hilbert's objectivity

Detlefsen (1986) reads Hilbert's program as a sophisticated defense of instrumentalism, but Feferman (1998) has it that Hilbert's program leaves significant ontological questions unanswered. One such question is of the reference of individual number terms. Hilbert's use of admittedly “meaningless” signs for numbers and formulae appears to impair his ability to establish the reference of mathematical terms and the content of mathematical propositions ( and ). The paper traces the history and context of Hilbert's reasoning about signs, which illuminates Hilbert's account of mathematical objectivity, axiomatics, idealization, and consistency.     

Lax-Phillips Scattering for Atomorphic Functions Based on the Eisenstein Transform

We construct a Lax-Phillips scattering system on the arithmetic quotient space of the Poincaré upper half-plane by the full modular group, based on the Eisenstein transform. We identify incoming and outgoing subspaces in the ambient space of all functions with finite energy-form for the non-Euclidean wave equation. The use of the Eisenstein transform along with some properties of the Eisenstein series of two variables enables one to work only on the space corresponding to the continuous spectrum of the Laplace-Beltrami operator. It is shown that the scattering matrix is the complex function appearing in the the functional equation of the Eisenstein series of two variables. We obtain a compression operator constructed from the Laplace-Beltrami operator, whose spectrum consists of eigenvalues that coincide, counted with multiplicities, with the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta-function. For this purpose we construct and use a scattering model on the one-dimensional Euclidean space.      

Jean Leray and nonlinear integral equations: A partially forgotten legacy

Some applications given in Jean Leray’s thesis of 1933 seem to have been forgotten, before being rediscovered and then widely developed. The reason may be found in the fact that the Arzelà–Schmidt’s method introduced in the thesis was superseded one year later by the more general and fruitful Leray-Schauder’s method. We also show that, despite its fame and a steadily increasing number of applications, some aspects of Leray–Schauder’s paper were somewhat forgotten too. Dedicated, with admiration, to the living memory of Jean Leray     

Hidden lemmas in the early history of infinite series

Euler, Fourier, Poisson and Cauchy appear to have used, in a more or less implicit form, some facts on infinitely small quantities. Attempting to state and prove several lemmata, I shall discuss their relationships to interchanges of limits in series and integrals. Early methods of summation for divergent series and integrals, including a conjecture of Poisson, are discussed.Dedicated to Professor Otto Haupt with best wishes on his 100th birthday.     

Decimal periods and their tables: A German research topic (1765–1801)

At the beginning of the 18th century, several mathematicians noted regularities in the decimal expansions of common fractions. Rules of thumb were set up, but it was only from 1760 onward that the first attempts to try to establish a coherent theory of periodic decimal fractions appeared. J.H. Lambert was the first to devote two essays to the topic, but his colleagues at the Berlin Academy, J. III Bernoulli and J.L. Lagrange, also spent time on the problem. Apart from the theoretical side of the question, the applications (factoring, irrationality proofs, and computational advantages), as well as the tabulation of decimal periods, aroused considerable interest, especially among Lambert's correspondents, C.F. Hindenburg and I. Wolfram. Finally, in 1797–1801, the young C.F. Gauss, informed of these developments, based the whole theory on firm number-theoretic foundations, thereby solving most of the open problems left by the mathematicians before him.     

The origins of Euler's early work on continued fractions

In this paper, I examine Euler's early work on the elementary properties of continued fractions in the 1730s, and investigate its possible links to previous writings on continued fractions by authors such as William Brouncker. By analysing the content of Euler's first paper on continued fractions, ‘De fractionibus continuis dissertatio’ (1737, published 1744) I conclude that, contrary to what one might expect, Euler's work on continued fractions initially arose not from earlier writings on continued fractions, but from a wish to solve the Riccati differential equation.     

The emergence of open sets,closed sets,and limit points in analysis and topology

General topology has its roots in real and complex analysis, which made important uses of the interrelated concepts of open set, of closed set, and of a limit point of a set. This article examines how those three concepts emerged and evolved during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, thanks especially to Weierstrass, Cantor, and Lebesgue. Particular attention is paid to the different forms of the Bolzano–Weierstrass Theorem found in the latter's unpublished lectures. An abortive early, unpublished introduction of open sets by Dedekind is examined, as well as how Peano and Jordan almost introduced that concept. At the same time we study the interplay of those three concepts (together with those of the closure of a set and of the derived set of a set) in the struggle to determine the ultimate foundations on which general topology was built, during the first half of the 20th century.     

A treatise on proportion in the tradition of Thomas Bradwardine: The De proportionibus libri duo (1528) of Jean Fernel

The famous French physician Jean Fernel published in 1528 in Paris the De proportionibus libri duo. This treatise belongs to the tradition of texts on proportion that follow Bradwardine?s Tractatus de proportionibus seu de proportionibus velocitatum in motibus (1328). In the first book, Fernel presented a theory of ratios that is traditional but contains some distinctive features, on denominating ratios, on fractions, on irrational ratios. The second book is devoted to a theory of ratio of ratios of which I give an account in this paper.