Building bridges within mathematics education: Teaching, research, and instructional design

Within mathematics education, classroom teachers, educational researchers, and instructional designers share the common goals of understanding and improving the teaching and learning of mathematics. Teachers work to help students learn; researchers study how people learn and teach mathematics; and designers develop instructional materials to support teachers and students. Each community (of teachers, of researchers, and of designers) develops its own perspectives, methods, and expertise. Too seldom, however, do practitioners have the opportunity to share their knowledge across communities. This first-person, retrospective case study speaks to the challenges and rewards of building bridges among these three communities by charting the evolution of an instructional activity (using graphing software to explore slope) through four cycles of teaching, research, and design. Initially separate, the three perspectives of teacher, researcher, and designer begin to interact as the worksite moves from the university laboratory to the author's classroom and then to other teachers’ classrooms. Many of these interactions are fruitful, resulting in new insights and strategies that strengthen the final product and inform the practitioner. At the same time, some tensions arise, particularly between teaching and research, highlighting fundamental differences between these fields. Lessons from this case study suggest implications for collaborations among teachers, researchers, and designers.     

Researching how professional mathematicians construct new mathematical definitions: a case study

In this work, we study the mathematical practice of defining by mathematics researchers. Since research is an important part of many professional mathematicians, understanding how they do research is a necessary step before thinking about future researchers’ undergraduate and postgraduate education. We focus on the defining process associated with the generalization of existing definitions as a way of constructing new ones. Data of this qualitative study come from a case study whose subject is a mathematics researcher in the area of differential geometry. We have interviewed this researcher and collected her research documents. From our analysis of the data, we have identified four phases in the defining process (Finding an opportunity to generalize an existing concept, Proposing a new definition, Justifying that the new definition is valid and Continuing the chain of definitions), which we will describe in detail in Section 4.     

Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: a case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course

It is widely accepted by mathematics educators and mathematicians that most proof-oriented university mathematics courses are taught in a “definition-theorem-proof” format. However, there are relatively few empirical studies on what takes place during this instruction, why this instruction is used, and how it affects students’ learning. In this paper, I investigate these issues by examining a case study of one professor using this type of instruction in an introductory real analysis course. I first describe the professor’s actions in the classroom and argue that these actions are the result of the professor’s beliefs about mathematics, students, and education, as well as his knowledge of the material being covered. I then illustrate how the professor’s teaching style influenced the way that his students attempted to learn the material. Finally, I discuss the implications that the reported data have on mathematics education research.     

Pourquoi, pour qui enseigner les mathématiques?

The evolution of education in Belgium is described from 1830 to our days. The mastery of education has always been a subject of disputes between the political forces in presence. With the flow of years, more attention is paid to social considerations and the necessity of a more democratic educational system arises. Simultaneously the pedagogical ideas change and active methods of teaching are promoted, although not always used. Different schoolsystems still coexist. However, except for philosophical and religious education, the differences between them tend to diminish. This is in particular the case for mathematics teaching whose evolution is also described with some details.     

Understanding rigid geometric transformations: Jeff's learning path for translation

This article describes the development of knowledge and understanding of translations of Jeff, a prospective elementary teacher, during a teaching experiment that also included other rigid transformations. His initial conceptions of translations and other rigid transformations were characterized as undefined motions of a single object. He conceived of transformations as movement and showed no indication about what defines a transformation. The results of the study indicate that the development of his thinking about translations and other rigid transformations followed an order of (1) transformations as undefined motions of a single object, (2) transformations as defined motions of a single object, and (3) transformations as defined motions of all points on the plane. The case of Jeff is part of a bigger study that included four prospective teachers and analyzed their development in understanding of rigid transformations. The other participants also showed a similar evolution.     

Research on mathematics education

This study addresses aspects that should be considered in every investigation concerning the reality of the subject being investigated, which in turn provide the basis for the procedures adopted to carry out the research. It speaks about the analysis of the procedures chosen to carry out the research. It is assumed that this care should be taken by the researcher at the moment the research procedures are being defined and made explicit. It is argued that the consonance between the ontological and epistemological dimensions of “what” and “how” to investigate the subject of investigation confers a degree of confidence to the research findings. The search for that confidence transcends analyses based only on calculations and explanations of methodological procedures, regardless of how well founded they are. This study addresses mathematics education specifically, adopting a phenomenological perspective. It is focused on the constitution of mathematical idealities and of mathematics as a science under the perspective of the Husserlian phenomenological conception of reality and knowledge. Characteristics of a phenomenological pedagogy are presented, which is carried out through work that is always intentional, with the educator taking account of what occurs with himself/herself, with the life world of the school, and with the student. The student is seen as a person and as being with others, his/her classmates, and the theme is addressed in the context of the field of inquiry under focus, with the teacher and with his/her “surroundings”.     

Mobilizing histories in mathematics teacher education: memories, social practices, and discursive games

In the first part of this paper, we share and elucidate the way we mobilize histories in some disciplines that are part of the undergraduate courses in mathematics teacher education offered by State University of Campinas and Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte in Brazil. This way of mobilization can be featured as a set of collective indisciplinary problematizations occurring in a series of student investigations. Mobilizing practices of mathematics culture are the object of these investigations. These practices are performed by different communities both constituted by and constituent of different human activities. In the second part of this paper, we will discuss our way of mobilizing histories, contrasting it with the theoretical perspective of expansive learning, just as it has been defended by Yrjö Engeström, in his article Non scolae sed vitae discimus—towards overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. We will also attempt to highlight the role which this researcher has attributed to history in his model of expansive learning, a perspective based on the current research on activity theory.     

Engaging a third-grade student with autism spectrum disorder in an error finding activity

This paper describes a case study of one mainstreamed third grade student with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and his ability to explain his solutions for two-digit addition problems, and find and explain the mistake when presented with incorrectly solved addition problems. The study is presented as a counterexample to deficit views of ASD, views that focus on lack of communication skills, not being able to see someone else’s point of view, and poor executive functions. Each encounter with the student is analyzed in two ways, first analyzing his mathematical knowledge, and then analyzing obstacles the student faces that are associated with ASD. Some obstacles are overcome by the student on his own and others are overcome with the help of the researcher, who responds to the student’s thinking, and supports his endeavor to engage with a challenging activity.     

Making mathematics and science integration happen: key aspects of practice

The integration of mathematics and science teaching and learning facilitates student learning, engagement, motivation, problem-solving, criticality and real-life application. However, the actual implementation of an integrative approach to the teaching and learning of both subjects at classroom level, with in-service teachers working collaboratively, at second-level education, is under-researched due to the complexities of school-based research. This study reports on a year-long case study on the implementation of an integrated unit of learning on distance, speed and time, within three second-level schools in Ireland. This study employed a qualitative approach and examined the key aspects of practice that impact on the integration of mathematics and science teaching and learning. We argue that teacher perspective, teacher knowledge of the ‘other subject’ and of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), and teacher collaboration and support all impact on the implementation of an integrative approach to mathematics and science education.     

Beyond mathematical content knowledge: A mathematician's knowledge needed for teaching an inquiry-oriented differential equations course

In this research report we examine knowledge other than content knowledge needed by a mathematician in his first use of an inquiry-oriented curriculum for teaching an undergraduate course in differential equations. Collaboratively, the mathematician and two mathematics education researchers identified the challenges faced by the mathematician as he began to adopt reform-minded teaching practices. Our analysis reveals that responding to those challenges entailed formulating and addressing particular instructional goals, previously unfamiliar to the instructor. From a cognitive analytical perspective, we argue that the instructor's knowledge — or lack of knowledge — influenced his ability to set and accomplish his instructional goals as he planned for, reflected on, and enacted instruction. By studying the teaching practices of a professional mathematician, we identify forms of knowledge apart from mathematical content knowledge that are essential to reform-oriented teaching, and we highlight how knowledge acquired through more traditional instructional practices may fail to support research-based forms of student-centered teaching.     

Humans-with-media and continuing education for mathematics teachers in online environments

This paper begins by situating online mathematics education in Brazil within the context of research on digital technology over the past 25?years. I argue that Brazilian research on technology in mathematics education can be divided into four phases, and then present an example that ??blends?? aspects of the second and third phases. Phase two can be characterized by research with software designed to address traditional mathematics topics, such as functions, while the third phase is characterized by online courses. The data presented show creative solutions for a problem designed for collectives of humans-with-function-software. The paper is analyzed from a perspective that emphasizes the role of different technologies as teachers and professors collaborate to produce knowledge about the use of mathematical software in regular face-to-face classrooms. A model of online education is presented. Finally, the paper discusses how technology may change collaboration and teaching approaches in continuing education, as it allows for greater integration of online learning with teachers?? classroom activities in schools. In this case, the online platform plays an active role in the learning collective composed of humans-with-media.     

Mathematics teachers’ conceptions and constraints for changing teaching practices in Brazilian higher education: an analysis through activity theory

In recent years, changes in the Brazilian economic and social scenario have generated a growing demand for higher education in the country. In response to this new context, the federal government launched in 2007 a programme aiming at expansion of the enrolment to public higher education. In such environment of changes, several proposals have emerged to adapt the Brazilian federal universities to a new reality. Taking this context into account, the focus of our study is on proposals from the Mathematics Department of the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Their aim is to create a new model of teaching practices for the freshman lessons of the Exact Sciences area, which at first were being experimented in special classrooms of students attending their first course on differential and integral calculus. The data were collected from interviews with students and professors from the mathematics department. They were analyzed and systematized using an activity theory approach. We became instigated by a model developed by Engeström in his study on the changes in the Finnish public health system, considering it as a test (testbench) for activity theory in its application to a particular case. Following Engeström's footsteps when developing his research, we arrived at our own model showing the internal tensions in the activity of reformulation of the courses offered by the Department of Mathematics and in the conceptions of teachers that promote – and constraint – the proposals for change.     

Arithmetical thinking in children attending special schools for the intellectually disabled

This article focuses on spontaneous and progressive knowledge building in “the arithmetic of the child.” The aim is to investigate variations in the behavior patterns of eight pupils attending a school for the intellectually disabled. The study is based on the epistemology of radical constructivism and the methodology of multiple clinical interviews. Theoretical models elucidate behavior patterns and the corresponding mental structures underlying them. The individual interviews of the pupils were video recorded. The results show that the activated behavior patterns, which are responses to well-adapted contexts presented by the researcher, are compatible with findings in Swedish compulsory schools. Six of the pupils’ mental structures in the study are numerical. A substantial implication for special education is the harmonization of the content in teaching with the children's own ways of operating, which implies a triadic teaching process.     

Mathematics teaching and values education—an intersection in need of research

This paper raises issues concerning the teaching of values in the context of mathematics education. It argues that a focus on education for democracy inevitably involves educating about values. It reviews the major relevant research and theoretical perspectives and argues for more research attention to be paid to this area. Although there has been relevant research done in the affective domain, both in general and in relation to mathematics, and in social and cultural issues, there is little direct research focus on either values or valuing. Teachers are rarely aware of teaching values either explicitly or implicitly, yet values teaching clearly does take place, mostly implicitly. If there are desires to change the directions of mathematics teaching to be more attuned to life in modern democratic societies then this aspect of mathematics education needs to be better understood in order that it can be better taught.     

MODELS AND SUPER-MODELS: WAYS OF THINKING ABOUT PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN MATHEMATICS TEACHING[1]

Teaching about teaching is a complex process requiring knowledge about teaching as well as knowledge about teaching about teaching. We have published findings on research carried out over the last few years about teachers’ subject knowledge. This research led to the proposal of a model for thinking about subject knowledge which distinguishes between knowledge needed to pass an examination and knowledge needed to help someone else to come to know that knowledge. The first is necessary but not sufficient for the latter. This model for thinking about subject knowledge has led to proposals for similar models for thinking about other aspects of teacher knowledge and has more recently developed into a parallel model for thinking about teacher education.     

Standards for professionalization of mathematics teachers: policy, curricula, and national teacher employment test in Korea

International comparative studies such as the Trend in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) indicate that Korean students have consistently performed well. In addition, a recent study titled Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) compared prospective teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about teaching and learning in six participant countries, reporting that Korean prospective secondary mathematics teachers were better prepared than those in other countries. In this context, this study has examined the curricula for mathematics teacher education and teacher employment tests in order to investigate the social expectation for teacher professionalization in Korea, particularly focusing on teacher knowledge. The analysis shows that while elementary mathematics teacher education emphasizes pedagogical knowledge, the secondary mathematics education curricula are highly content knowledge oriented. However, the secondary mathematics teacher education includes various aspects of pedagogical content knowledge in its curricula and teacher employment test. This research also identifies the discourse concerning mathematics instruction for diversity and equity and the emphasis of reflective practice as the significant development of the current Korean teacher education.     

A Collaborative Effort to Improve University Engineering Instruction

This study focused on the instructional development of an assistant professor of environmental engineering in collaboration with science education and higher education faculty members. One semester of data was collected in the assistant professor's environmental engineering laboratory class as he endeavored to address his teaching goals. Data collection included pre and post interviews with the assistant professor, students, and program coordinator, and collection of course documents, such as the course syllabus and assignments. In addition, all of the classroom sessions were observed and videotaped, and a midsemester video stimulated‐recall interview was conducted. Results show the assistant professor made growth in the areas of questioning strategies, “think time” for students, increased class participation, and the implementation of a student‐designed field research project. Implications include that new professors can benefit from peer faculty support, and they and their students can benefit when the new professors recognize the complementary nature of research and teaching.     

Making sense of instruction on fractions when a student lacks necessary fractional schemes: The case of Tim

This paper critically examines the discrepancies among the pre-requisite fractional concepts assumed by a curricular unit on operations with fractions, the teacher's assumptions about those concepts and a particular student's understanding of fractions. The paper focuses on the case of one student (Tim) in the teacher's 6th grade class who was interviewed by one of the authors once a week during the teaching of the unit. The teaching materials and the teacher's instruction were based on the assumption that students understood the concept of a unit fraction as being one of several equal parts of a given whole. The teacher neither emphasized the need for equal parts nor the part-to-whole relation. The teacher's reasonable assumptions about her students’ understanding of fractions were severely challenged by the cognitive constructs that Tim exhibited during his first two interviews. When she viewed tapes of the class instruction and the interviews with Tim she realized Tim lacked essential constructs to make sense of her instruction. She subsequently made adjustments in her instruction, making effective use of more appropriate representations based on tasks from the unit that we modified and used with Tim in our interviews. These adjustments helped Tim to construct partitioning operations and an appropriate unit fractional scheme. This study illustrates the importance of coming to understand a student's mathematical activity in terms of possible conceptual schemes and modifying instructional strategies to build on those schemes. The coordinated design of the research study facilitated these instructional modifications.