Deep sequent systems for modal logic

We see a systematic set of cut-free axiomatisations for all the basic normal modal logics formed by some combination the axioms d, t, b, 4, 5. They employ a form of deep inference but otherwise stay very close to Gentzen’s sequent calculus, in particular they enjoy a subformula property in the literal sense. No semantic notions are used inside the proof systems, in particular there is no use of labels. All their rules are invertible and the rules cut, weakening and contraction are admissible. All systems admit a straightforward terminating proof search procedure as well as a syntactic cut elimination procedure.      

Labeled sequent calculi for modal logics and implicit contractions

The paper settles an open question concerning Negri-style labeled sequent calculi for modal logics and also, indirectly, other proof systems which make (more or less) explicit use of semantic parameters in the syntax and are thus subsumed by labeled calculi, like Brünnler’s deep sequent calculi, Poggiolesi’s tree-hypersequent calculi and Fitting’s prefixed tableau systems. Specifically, the main result we prove (through a semantic argument) is that labeled calculi for the modal logics K and D remain complete w.r.t. valid sequents whose relational part encodes a tree-like structure, when the unique rule which contains an harmful implicit contraction—by which the condition that the premises be less complex than the conclusion is violated—is modified into a contraction-free one respecting the latter condition, thus making the proof-search space finite.     

A coding method for a sequent calculus of propositional logic

The paper deals with a coding method for a sequent calculus of the propositional logic. The method is based on the sequent calculus. It allows us to determine if a formula is derivable in the calculus without constructing a derivation tree. The main advantage of the coding method is its compactness in comparison with derivation trees of the sequent calculus. The coding method can be used as a decision procedure for the propositional logic.     

Analytic proof systems for λ-calculus: the elimination of transitivity, and why it matters

We introduce new proof systems G[β] and G _ext[β], which are equivalent to the standard equational calculi of λβ- and λβη- conversion, and which may be qualified as ‘analytic’ because it is possible to establish, by purely proof-theoretical methods, that in both of them the transitivity rule admits effective elimination. This key feature, besides its intrinsic conceptual significance, turns out to provide a common logical background to new and comparatively simple demonstrations—rooted in nice proof-theoretical properties of transitivity-free derivations—of a number of well-known and central results concerning β- and βη-reduction. The latter include the Church–Rosser theorem for both reductions, the Standardization theorem for β- reduction, as well as the Normalization (Leftmost reduction) theorem and the Postponement of η-reduction theorem for βη-reduction      

A Sahlqvist theorem for distributive modal logic

In this paper we consider distributive modal logic, a setting in which we may add modalities, such as classical types of modalities as well as weak forms of negation, to the fragment of classical propositional logic given by conjunction, disjunction, true, and false. For these logics we define both algebraic semantics, in the form of distributive modal algebras, and relational semantics, in the form of ordered Kripke structures. The main contributions of this paper lie in extending the notion of Sahlqvist axioms to our generalized setting and proving both a correspondence and a canonicity result for distributive modal logics axiomatized by Sahlqvist axioms. Our proof of the correspondence result relies on a reduction to the classical case, but our canonicity proof departs from the traditional style and uses the newly extended algebraic theory of canonical extensions.     

A sequent calculus for logic of knowledge and past time: Completeness and decidability

We consider logic of knowledge and past time. This logic involves the discrete-time linear temporal operators next, until, weak yesterday, and since. In addition, it contains an indexed set of unary modal operators agent i knows.We consider the semantic constraint of the unique initial states for this logic. For the logic, we present a sequent calculus with a restricted cut rule. We prove the soundness and completeness of the sequent calculus presented. We prove the decidability of provability in the considered calculus as well. So, this calculus can be used as a basis for automated theorem proving. The proof method for the completeness can be used to construct complete sequent calculi with a restricted cut rule for this logic with other semantical constraints as well. Published in Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 427–437, July–September, 2006.     

A modal logic framework for reasoning about comparative distances and topology

We propose and investigate a uniform modal logic framework for reasoning about topology and relative distance in metric and more general distance spaces, thus enabling the comparison and combination of logics from distinct research traditions such as Tarski’s S4 for topological closure and interior, conditional logics, and logics of comparative similarity. This framework is obtained by decomposing the underlying modal-like operators into first-order quantifier patterns. We then show that quite a powerful and natural fragment of the resulting first-order logic can be captured by one binary operator comparing distances between sets and one unary operator distinguishing between realised and limit distances (i.e., between minimum and infimum). Due to its greater expressive power, this logic turns out to behave quite differently from both S4 and conditional logics. We provide finite (Hilbert-style) axiomatisations and ExpTime-completeness proofs for the logics of various classes of distance spaces, in particular metric spaces. But we also show that the logic of the real line (and various other important metric spaces) is not recursively enumerable. This result is proved by an encoding of Diophantine equations.     

A two-dimensional metric temporal logic

We introduce a two-dimensional metric (interval) temporal logic whose internal and external time flows are dense linear orderings. We provide a suitable semantics and a sequent calculus with axioms for equality and extralogical axioms. Then we prove completeness and a semantic partial cut elimination theorem down to formulas of a certain type.     

Algorithmic correspondence and canonicity for distributive modal logic

We define the algorithm ALBA for the language of the same distributive modal logic (DML) for which a Sahlqvist theorem was proved by Gehrke, Nagahashi, and Venema. Successful executions of ALBA compute the local first-order correspondents of input DML inequalities, and also guarantee their canonicity. The class of inequalities on which ALBA is successful is strictly larger than the newly introduced class of inductive inequalities, which in its turn properly extends the Sahlqvist inequalities of Gehrke et al. Evidence is given to the effect that, as their name suggests, inductive inequalities are the distributive counterparts of the inductive formulas of Goranko and Vakarelov in the classical setting.     

A modal provability logic of explicit and implicit proofs

We establish the bi-modal forgetful projection of the Logic of Proofs and Formal Provability GLA. That is to say, we present a normal bi-modal provability logic with modalities □ and whose theorems are precisely those formulas for which the implicit provability assertions represented by the modality can be realized by explicit proof terms.     

A spatial modal logic with a location interpretation

A spatial modal logic (SML) is introduced as an extension of the modal logic S4 with the addition of certain spatial operators. A sound and complete Kripke semantics with a natural space (or location) interpretation is obtained for SML. The finite model property with respect to the semantics for SML and the cut‐elimination theorem for a modified subsystem of SML are also presented. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Solvability of logical equations in the modal system Grz and intuitionistic logic

Krasnoyarsk. Translated fromSibirskii Matematicheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 140–153, March–April, 1991.     

Loop-free calculus for modal logic S4. II

In [J. Andrikonis, Loop-free calculus for modal logic S4. I, Lith. Math. J., 52(1):1–12, 2012], loop-free calculus for modal logic S4 is presented. The calculus uses several types of indexes to avoid loops and obtain termination of derivation search. Although the mentioned article proves that derivation search in the calculus is finite, the proof of soundness and completeness is omitted and, therefore, is presented in this paper. Moreover, this paper presents loop-free calculus for modal logics K4, which is obtained by modifying the calculus for S4. Finally, some remarks for programming the given calculi are offered.     

Loop-free calculus for modal logic S4. I

In the article, loop-free calculus for modal logic S4 is presented. To restrict applications of reflexivity and transitivity rules, several types of indexes are used. The use of indexes replaces the need to keep the history of previous applications of the rules. The article details the purpose of each type of index and proves that derivation search in the calculus is finite.     

Scattered and hereditarily irresolvable spaces in modal logic

When we interpret modal ? as the limit point operator of a topological space, the Gödel-Löb modal system GL defines the class Scat of scattered spaces. We give a partition of Scat into α-slices S _α , where α ranges over all ordinals. This provides topological completeness and definability results for extensions of GL. In particular, we axiomatize the modal logic of each ordinal α, thus obtaining a simple proof of the Abashidze–Blass theorem. On the other hand, when we interpret ? as closure in a topological space, the Grzegorczyk modal system Grz defines the class HI of hereditarily irresolvable spaces. We also give a partition of HI into α-slices H _α , where α ranges over all ordinals. For a subset A of a hereditarily irresolvable space X and an ordinal α, we introduce the α-representation of A, give an axiomatization of the α-representation of A, and characterize H _α in terms of α-representations. We prove that ${X \in {\bf H}_{1}}When we interpret modal ◊ as the limit point operator of a topological space, the G?del-L?b modal system GL defines the class Scat of scattered spaces. We give a partition of Scat into α-slices S _α , where α ranges over all ordinals. This provides topological completeness and definability results for extensions of GL. In particular, we axiomatize the modal logic of each ordinal α, thus obtaining a simple proof of the Abashidze–Blass theorem. On the other hand, when we interpret ◊ as closure in a topological space, the Grzegorczyk modal system Grz defines the class HI of hereditarily irresolvable spaces. We also give a partition of HI into α-slices H _α , where α ranges over all ordinals. For a subset A of a hereditarily irresolvable space X and an ordinal α, we introduce the α-representation of A, give an axiomatization of the α-representation of A, and characterize H _α in terms of α-representations. We prove that X ? H₁{X \in {\bf H}_{1}} iff X is submaximal. For a positive integer n, we generalize the notion of a submaximal space to that of an n-submaximal space, and prove that X ? H_n{X \in {\bf H}_{n}} iff X is n-submaximal. This provides topological completeness and definability results for extensions of Grz. We show that the two partitions are related to each other as follows. For a successor ordinal α = β + n, with β a limit ordinal and n a positive integer, we have H_a ?Scat = S_b+2n-1 èS_b+2n{{\bf H}_{\alpha} \cap {\bf Scat} = {\bf S}_{\beta+2n-1} \cup {\bf S}_{\beta+2n}} , and for a limit ordinal α, we have H_a ?Scat = S_a{{\bf H}_{\alpha} \cap {\bf Scat} = {\bf S}_{\alpha}} . As a result, we obtain full and faithful translations of ordinal complete extensions of Grz into ordinal complete extensions of GL, thus generalizing the Kuznetsov–Goldblatt–Boolos theorem.