共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Abe K Adachi I Aihara H Arinstein K Asano Y Aulchenko V Aushev T Aziz T Bakich AM Balagura V Barbero M Bedny I Bitenc U Bizjak I Bondar A Bracko M Brodzicka J Browder TE Chao Y Chen A Cheon BG Chistov R Choi SK Choi Y Choi YK Chuvikov A Cole S Dalseno J Danilov M Dash M Drutskoy A Eidelman S Epifanov D Fratina S Gabyshev N Gershon T Gokhroo G Golob B Ha HC Haba J Hasegawa Y Hayasaka K Hayashii H Hazumi M Hinz L Hoshi Y Hou S Hou WS Hsiung YB Iijima T Ishikawa A Iwasaki M Iwasaki Y Kapusta P 《Physical review letters》2007,98(8):082001
We report the first observation of a charmoniumlike state recoiling from the J/psi in the inclusive process e+e- -->J/psi+anything at a mass of (3.943+/-0.006+/-0.006) GeV/c{2}. We also observe the decay of this state into D*D[over ] and determine its intrinsic width to be less than 52 MeV/c{2} at the 90% C.L. These results are obtained from a 357 fb{-1} data sample collected with the Belle detector near the Upsilon(4S) resonance, at the KEKB asymmetric-energy e+e- collider. 相似文献
2.
Next-to-leading-order (NLO) QCD corrections to double J/psi production in e+e- annihilation at sqrt[s]=10.6 GeV are calculated. We find that they greatly decrease the cross section, with a K factor (NLO/LO) ranging from -0.31 to 0.25 depending on the renormalization scale. Although the renormalization scale dependence indicates a large uncertainty, when combined with the NLO QCD corrections to J/psi+etac production, it can explain why the double J/psi production could not be found at B factories while the J/psi+etac production could, despite the fact that cross section of the former is larger than that of the latter at LO by a factor of 1.8. 相似文献
3.
Blaylock GT Bolton T Brown JS Bunnell KO Burnett TH Cassell RE Coffman D Cook V Coward DH Dorfan DE Dubois GP Eigen G Eisenstein BI Freese T Gladding G Grab C Heusch CA Hitlin DG Izen JM Köpke L Li A Lockman WS Mallik U Matthews CG Mir R Mockett PM Mozley RF Nemati B Odian A Parker J Parrish L Partridge R Pitman D Sadrozinski HF Scarlatella M Schalk TL Schindler RH Seiden A Simopoulos C Stockdale IE Stockhausen W Thaler JJ Toki W Tripsas B Villa F Wasserbaech S Wattenberg A Weinstein AJ 《Physical review letters》1987,58(21):2171-2174
4.
One of the most challenging open problems in heavy quarkonium physics is the double charm production in e+e- annihilation at B factories. The measured cross section of e+e- --> J/psi + eta(c) is much larger than leading order (LO) theoretical predictions. With the nonrelativistic QCD factorization formalism, we calculate the next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD correction to this process. Taking all one loop self-energy, triangle, box, and pentagon diagrams into account, and factoring the Coulomb-singular term into the cc bound state wave function, we get an ultraviolet and infrared finite correction to the cross section of e+e- --> J/psi + eta(c) at sqrt[s] = 10:6 GeV. We find that the NLO QCD correction can substantially enhance the cross section with a K factor (the ratio of NLO to LO) of about 1.8-2.1; hence, it greatly reduces the large discrepancy between theory and experiment. 相似文献
5.
Aubert B Barate R Boutigny D Couderc F Karyotakis Y Lees JP Poireau V Tisserand V Zghiche A Grauges-Pous E Palano A Pompili A Chen JC Qi ND Rong G Wang P Zhu YS Eigen G Ofte I Stugu B Abrams GS Borgland AW Breon AB Brown DN Button-Shafer J Cahn RN Charles E Day CT Gill MS Gritsan AV Groysman Y Jacobsen RG Kadel RW Kadyk J Kerth LT Kolomensky YG Kukartsev G Lynch G Mir LM Oddone PJ Orimoto TJ Pripstein M Roe NA Ronan MT Wenzel WA Barrett M Ford KE Harrison TJ Hart AJ Hawkes CM Morgan SE 《Physical review letters》2005,95(4):042002
We search for strange-pentaquark states that have been previously reported by other experiments--the Theta (1540)(+), Xi(5)(1860)(--), and Xi(5)(1860)(0)--in 123 fb(-1) of data recorded with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II e(+)e(-) storage ring. We find no evidence for these states and set 95% confidence level upper limits on the number of Theta(1540)(+) and Xi(5)(1860)(--) pentaquarks produced per e(+)e(-) annihilation into qq and Gamma(4S) decay. For qq events the Theta(1540)(+) [Xi(5)(1860)(--)] limit is about 8 [4] times lower than the rates measured for ordinary baryons of similar mass. 相似文献
6.
Abelev BI Aggarwal MM Ahammed Z Anderson BD Arkhipkin D Averichev GS Bai Y Balewski J Barannikova O Barnby LS Baudot J Baumgart S Belaga VV Bellingeri-Laurikainen A Bellwied R Benedosso F Betts RR Bhardwaj S Bhasin A Bhati AK Bichsel H Bielcik J Bielcikova J Bland LC Blyth SL Bombara M Bonner BE Botje M Bouchet J Brandin AV Burton TP Bystersky M Cai XZ Caines H Calderón de la Barca Sánchez M Callner J Catu O Cebra D Cervantes MC Chajecki Z Chaloupka P Chattopadhyay S Chen HF Chen JH Chen JY 《Physical review letters》2008,100(23):232003
We report a new STAR measurement of the longitudinal double-spin asymmetry A(LL) for inclusive jet production at midrapidity in polarized p + p collisions at a center-of-mass energy of sqrt[s]=200 GeV. The data, which cover jet transverse momenta 5相似文献
7.
Abachi S Derrick M Kooijman P Musgrave B Price LE Repond J Sugano K Waschbusch P Blockus D Brabson B Brom JM Jung C Ogren H Rust DR Akerlof C Chapman J Errede D Ken MT Meyer DI Neal H Nitz D Thun R Tschirhart R Baringer P Bylsma BG DeBonte R Koltick D Low EH McIlwain RL Miller DH Ng CR Shibata EI Cork B 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1989,40(3):706-711
8.
Li YK Li J Cheng CP Gu P Ye MH Zhu YC Imlay R Kirk P Lim J McNeil RR Metcalf W Myung SS Abashian A Gotow K Hu KP Low EH Mattson ME Piilonen L Sterner KL Lusin S Rosenfeld C Wang AT Wilson S Frautschi M Kagan H Kass R Trahern CG Breedon RE Kim GN Ko W Lander RL Maeshima K Malchow RL Smith JR Stuart D Abe K Fujii Y Higashi Y Kim SK Kurihara Y Maki A Nozaki T Omori T Sagawa H Sakai Y Sugimoto Y Takaiwa Y Terada S Walker RC Kajino F Perticone D Poling R Thomas T Ishi Y Miyano K Miyata H Sasaki T 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1990,41(9):2675-2688
9.
Adachi I Aihara H Dijkstra HB Enomoto R Fujii H Fujii K Fujii T Fujimoto J Fujiwara N Hayashii H Higashi S Iida N Imanishi A Ikeda H Ishii T Itoh R Iwasaki H Iwata S Kajikawa R Kamae T Kato S Kawabata S Kichimi H Kishida T Kobayashi M Kuroda S Kusuki N Maruyama A Maruyama K Masuda H Matsuda T Miyamoto A Morimoto T Nakamura K Nitoh O Noguchi S Ochiai F Okuno H Okusawa T Ohshima T Ozaki H Sato T Sai F Shimonaka J Shimozawa K Shirahashi A Sugahara R Sugiyama A Suzuki S Suwada T Takahashi K 《Physical review letters》1988,60(2):97-100
10.
Zheng HW Perez P Auchincloss P Blanis D Bodek A Budd H Eno S Fry CA Harada H Ho YH Kim YK Kumita T Mori T Olsen SL Shaw NM Sill A Thorndike EH Ueno K Imlay R Kirk P Lim J McNeil RR Metcalf W Myung SS Cheng CP Gu P Li J Li YK Ye MH Zhu YC Abashian A Gotow K Hu KP Low EH Mattson ME Piilonen L Sterner KL Lusin S Rosenfeld C Wang AT Wilson S Frautschi M Kagan H Kass R Trahern CG Breedon RE Kim GN Ko W Lander RL Maeshima K Malchow RL Smith JR Stuart D Abe K Fujii Y Higashi Y Kim SK Kurihara Y Maki A 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1990,42(3):737-747
11.
12.
13.
Ford WT Qi N Read AL Smith JG Camporesi T De Sangro R Peruzzi I Piccolo M Hurst RB Pyrlik J Venuti JP Weinstein R Gettner MW Goderre GP Sleeman JC von Goeler E Chadwick GB Leedy RE Messner RL Moss LJ Muller F Nelson HN Ritson DM Rosenberg LJ Wiser DE Zdarko RW Groom DE Verdini PG Band HR Delfino MC Johnson JR Lavine TL Maruyama T Prepost R 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1989,40(5):1385-1396
14.
Kanda S Olsen SL Ueno K Kirk P Cheng CP Ye MH Abashian A Gotow K Haim D Mattson ME Piilonen L Sterner KL Choi SK Lusin S Rosenfeld C Wilson S Zheng LY Fry CA Tanaka R Chinitz LM Ko W Lander RL Rowe J Smith JR Stuart D Abe K Breedon RE Fujii Y Kurihara Y Liu F Maki A Nozaki T Omori T Sagawa H Sakai Y Sasaki T Sugimoto Y Takaiwa Y Terada S Kajino F Aso T Miyano K Miyata H Ohkubo K Oyoshi M Shirai M Takashimizu N Yamashita Y Schnetzer S Vinson J Walker RC Bodek A Kim BJ Kumita T Velissaris C 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1995,52(9):4872-4876
15.
Takaki H Haba J Abe K Amako K Arai Y Arima T Asano Y Chiba M Chiba Y Daigo M Fukawa M Fukushima Y Hemmi Y Higuchi M Hinode F Hirose T Homma Y Hoshi Y Hosoda N Ishihara N Kanatani E Kanda N Kanematsu N Kanzaki J Kikuchi R Kondo T Korhonen TT Krüger AE Kurashige H MacNaughton J Matsui T Miyake K Miura M Mori S Nagashima Y Nakamura T Nakano I Odaka S Ogawa K Ohama T Ohsugi T Ohyama H Okamoto A Ono A Oyama T Sakamoto H Sakuda M Sato M Sato N Shioden M Shirai J Shirakata M Sumiyoshi T Suzuki A 《Physical review letters》1993,71(1):38-41
16.
Aihara H Alston-Garnjost M Avery RE Barbaro-Galtieri A Barker AR Barnett BA Bauer DA Bay A Bobbink GJ Buchanan CD Buijs A Caldwell DO Chao H Chun S Clark AR Cowan GD Crane DA Dahl OI Daoudi M Derby KA Eastman JJ Eberhard PH Edberg TK Eisner AM Enomoto R Erné FC Fairfield KH Hauptman JM Hofmann W Hylen J Kamae T Kaye HS Kenney RW Khacheryan S Kofler RR Langeveld WG Layter JG Lin WT Linde FL Loken SC Lu A Lynch GR Madaras RJ Magnuson BD Masek GE Mathis LG Matthews JA Maxfield SJ Miller ES Moses W 《Physical review letters》1988,61(11):1263-1266
17.
Gomez-Cadenas JJ Heusch CA Abrams G Adolphsen CE Akerlof C Alexander JP Alvarez M Amidei D Baden AR Ballam J Barish BC Barklow T Barnett BA Bartelt J Blockus D Bonvicini G Boyarski A Boyer J Brabson B Breakstone A Brom JM Bulos F Burchat PR Burke DL Butler F Calvino F Cence RJ Chapman J Cords D Coupal DP DeStaebler HC Dorfan DE Dorfan JM Drell PS Feldman GJ Fernandez E Field RC Ford WT Fordham C Frey R Fujino D Gan KK Gidal G Gladney L Glanzman T Gold MS Goldhaber G Golding L Green A 《Physical review letters》1991,67(8):1007-1010
18.
von Zanthier C de Boer W Grindhammer G Hylen J Harral B Hearty C Labarga L Matthews J Schaad M Abrams G Adolphsen CE Akerlof C Alexander JP Alvarez M Baden AR Ballam J Barish BC Barklow T Barnett BA Bartelt J Blockus D Bonvicini G Boyarski A Boyer J Brabson B Breakstone A Brom JM Bulos F Burchat PR Burke DL Butler F Calvino F Cence RJ Chapman J Cords D Coupal DP DeStaebler HC Dorfan DE Dorfan JM Drell PS Feldman GJ Fernandez E Field RC Ford WT Fordham C Frey R Fujino D Gan KK Gidal G 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1991,43(1):34-45
19.
Ash WW Band HR Camporesi T Chadwick GB Delfino MC De Sangro R Ford WT Gettner MW Goderre GP Groom DE Hurst RB Johnson JR Lau KH Lavine TL Leedy RE Maruyama T Messner RL Moromisato JH Moss LJ Muller F Nelson HN Peruzzi I Piccolo M Prepost R Pyrlik J Qi N Read AL Ritson DM Ronga F Rosenberg LJ Shambroom WD Sleeman JC Smith JG Venuti JP Verdini PG von Goeler E Wald HB Weinstein R Wiser DE Zdarko RW 《Physical review letters》1987,58(11):1080-1083
20.
Yoshida H Chiba Y Endo I Hayashibara I Ohsugi T Taketani A Tanaka R Amako K Arai Y Boerner H Fukawa M Fukushima Y Ishihara N Kanzaki J Kondo T Maehata M Matsui T Odaka S Ogawa K Ohama T Sakamoto H Sakuda M Shirai J Sumiyoshi T Suekane F Teramoto Y Takasaki F Tsuboyama T Uehara S Unno Y Wake M Watase Y Yamada Y Noguchi Y Ono A Homma Y Hojyo Y Sakae H Hemmi Y Kikuchi R Kubo K Kurashige H Miyake K Nakamura T Sasao N Tamura N Tobimatsu K Haba J Kamitani T Kanematsu N Nagashima Y Osabe H Sakamoto S 《Physical review letters》1987,59(26):2915-2918