Finite invariant simplices in infinite graphs

It is shown that ifG is a graph which is contractible or dismantlable or finitely ball-Helly, and without infinite paths; or which is bounded, finitely ball-Helly and without infinite simplices then: (i) any contraction ofG stabilizes a finite simplex; and (ii)G contains a finite simplex which is invariant under any automorphism.     

Graphs without isometric rays and invariant subgraph properties,I

A ray of a graph G is isometric if every path in R is a shortest path in G. A vertex x of G geodesically dominates a subset A of V(G) if, for every finite S ⊆ V(G − x), there exists an element a of A − {x} such that the interval (set of vertices of all shortest paths) between x and a is disjoint from S. A set A ⊆ V(G) is geodesically closed if it contains all vertices which geodesically dominate A. These geodesically closed sets define a topology, called the geodesic topology, on V(G). We prove that a connected graph G has no isometric rays if and only if the set V(G) endowed with the geodesic topology is compact, or equivalently if and only if the vertex set of every ray in G is geodesically dominated. We prove different invariant subgraph properties for graphs containing no isometric rays. In particular we show that every self-contraction (map which preserves or contracts the edges) of a chordal graph G stabilizes a non-empty finite simplex (complete graph) if and only if G is connected and contains no isometric rays and no infinite simplices. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 27: 99–109, 1998     

Stable graphs for a family of endomorphisms

We prove several fixed subgraph properties. In particular it is shown that if is a commuting family of contractions of a connected graph G without infinite path and infinite interval, then there exists a nonempty finite subgraph F which is invariant under any element of . In particular this subgraph F is a simplex if G is moreover a strongly dismantlable graph or a ball-Helly graph without infinite block, or if it is chordal. This implies that for any commuting family of contractions of a tree without infinite path, there is a common fixed vertex or a common fixed edge.     

Strengthening Erdös–Pósa property for minor‐closed graph classes

Let ?? and ?? be graph classes. We say that ?? has the Erd?s–Pósa property for ?? if for any graph G ∈??, the minimum vertex covering of all ??‐subgraphs of G is bounded by a function f of the maximum packing of ??‐subgraphs in G (by ??‐subgraph of G we mean any subgraph of G that belongs to ??). Robertson and Seymour [J Combin Theory Ser B 41 (1986), 92–114] proved that if ?? is the class of all graphs that can be contracted to a fixed planar graph H, then ?? has the Erd?s–Pósa property for the class of all graphs with an exponential bounding function. In this note, we prove that this function becomes linear when ?? is any non‐trivial minor‐closed graph class. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 66:235‐240, 2011     

Rainbow faces in edge‐colored plane graphs

A face of an edge‐colored plane graph is called rainbow if the number of colors used on its edges is equal to its size. The maximum number of colors used in an edge coloring of a connected plane graph Gwith no rainbow face is called the edge‐rainbowness of G. In this paper we prove that the edge‐rainbowness of Gequals the maximum number of edges of a connected bridge face factor H of G, where a bridge face factor H of a plane graph Gis a spanning subgraph H of Gin which every face is incident with a bridge and the interior of any one face f∈F(G) is a subset of the interior of some face f′∈F(H). We also show upper and lower bounds on the edge‐rainbowness of graphs based on edge connectivity, girth of the dual graphs, and other basic graph invariants. Moreover, we present infinite classes of graphs where these equalities are attained. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 62: 84–99, 2009     

On Integral Sum Graphs

A graph G is said to be an integral sum graph if its nodes can be given a labeling f with distinct integers, so that for any two distinct nodes u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if f(u)+f(v) = f(w) for some node w in G. A node of G is called a saturated node if it is adjacent to every other node of G. We show that any integral sum graph which is not K₃ has at most two saturated nodes. We determine the structure for all integral sum graphs with exactly two saturated nodes, and give an upper bound for the number of edges of a connected integral sum graph with no saturated nodes. We introduce a method of identification on constructing new connected integral sum graphs from given integral sum graphs with a saturated node. Moreover, we show that every graph is an induced subgraph of a connected integral sum graph. Miscellaneous relative results are also presented.     

On the toughness index of planar graphs

The toughness indexτ(G) of a graph G is defined to be the largest integer t such that for any S ? V(G) with |S| > t, c(G - S) < |S| - t, where c(G - S) denotes the number of components of G - S. In particular, 1-tough graphs are exactly those graphs for which τ(G) ≥ 0. In this paper, it is shown that if G is a planar graph, then τ(G) ≥ 2 if and only if G is 4-connected. This result suggests that there may be a polynomial-time algorithm for determining whether a planar graph is 1-tough, even though the problem for general graphs is NP-hard. The result can be restated as follows: a planar graph is 4-connected if and only if it remains 1-tough whenever two vertices are removed. Hence it establishes a weakened version of a conjecture, due to M. D. Plummer, that removing 2 vertices from a 4-connected planar graph yields a Hamiltonian graph.     

The Ulam number of infinite graphs

The following is a conjecture of Ulam: In any partition of the integer lattice on the plane into uniformly bounded sets, there exists a set that is adjacent to at least six other sets. Two sets are adjacent if each contain a vertex of the same unit square. This problem is generalized as follows. Given any uniformly bounded partitionP of the vertex set of an infinite graphG with finite maximum degree, letP (G) denote the graph obtained by letting each set of the partition be a vertex ofP (G) where two vertices ofP (G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding sets have an edge between them. The Ulam number ofG is defined as the minimum of the maximum degree ofP (G) where the minimum is taken over all uniformly bounded partitionsP. We have characterized the graphs with Ulam number 0, 1, and 2. Restricting the partitions of the vertex set to connected subsets, we obtain the connected Ulam number ofG. We have evaluated the connected Ulam numbers for several infinite graphs. For instance we have shown that the connected Ulam number is 4 ifG is an infinite grid graph. We have settled the Ulam conjecture for the connected case by proving that the connected Ulam number is 6 for an infinite triangular grid graph. The general Ulam conjecture is equivalent to proving that the Ulam number of the infinite triangular grid graph equals 6. We also describe some interesting geometric consequences of the Ulam number, mainly concerning good drawings of infinite graphs.     

Total domination in 2‐connected graphs and in graphs with no induced 6‐cycles

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number γ_t(G) of G. It is known [J Graph Theory 35 (2000), 21–45] that if G is a connected graph of order n > 10 with minimum degree at least 2, then γ_t(G) ≤ 4n/7 and the (infinite family of) graphs of large order that achieve equality in this bound are characterized. In this article, we improve this upper bound of 4n/7 for 2‐connected graphs, as well as for connected graphs with no induced 6‐cycle. We prove that if G is a 2‐connected graph of order n > 18, then γ_t(G) ≤ 6n/11. Our proof is an interplay between graph theory and transversals in hypergraphs. We also prove that if G is a connected graph of order n > 18 with minimum degree at least 2 and no induced 6‐cycle, then γ_t(G) ≤ 6n/11. Both bounds are shown to be sharp. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 60: 55–79, 2009     

Retractions of split graphs and End-orthodox split graphs

A retraction f of a graph G is an edge-preserving mapping of G with f(v)=v for all v∈V(H), where H is the subgraph induced by the range of f. A graph G is called End-orthodox (End-regular) if its endomorphism monoid End X is orthodox (regular) in the semigroup sense. It is known that a graph is End-orthodox if it is End-regular and the composition of any two retractions is also a retraction. The retractions of split graphs are given and End-orthodox split graphs are characterized.     

A Ramsey-type theorem for traceable graphs

A graph G is traceable if there is a path passing through all the vertices of G. It is proved that every infinite traceable graph either contains arbitrarily large finite chordless paths, or contains a subgraph isomorphic to graph A, illustrated in the text. A corollary is that every finitely generated infinite lattice of length 3 contains arbitrarily large finite fences. It is also proved that every infinite traceable graph containing no chordless four-point path contains a subgraph isomorphic to K_ω,ω. The versions of these results for finite graphs are discussed.     

Orientation distance graphs

For two nonisomorphic orientations D and D′ of a graph G, the orientation distance d_o(D,D′) between D and D′ is the minimum number of arcs of D whose directions must be reversed to produce an orientation isomorphic to D′. The orientation distance graph 𝒟_o(G) of G has the set 𝒪(G) of pairwise nonisomorphic orientations of G as its vertex set and two vertices D and D′ of 𝒟₀(G) are adjacent if and only if d_o(D,D′) = 1. For a nonempty subset S of 𝒪(G), the orientation distance graph 𝒟₀(S) of S is the induced subgraph 〈S〉 of 𝒟_o(G). A graph H is an orientation distance graph if there exists a graph G and a set S⊆ 𝒪(G) such that 𝒟_o(S) is isomorphic to H. In this case, H is said to be an orientation distance graph with respect to G. This paper deals primarily with orientation distance graphs with respect to paths. For every integer n ≥ 4, it is shown that 𝒟_o(P_n) is Hamiltonian if and only if n is even. Also, the orientation distance graph of a path of odd order is bipartite. Furthermore, every tree is an orientation distance graph with respect to some path, as is every cycle, and for n ≥ 3 the clique number of 𝒟_o(P_n) is 2 if n is odd and is 3 otherwise. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 230–241, 2001     

Paired-Domination in Subdivided Star-Free Graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a paired-dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S and if the subgraph induced by S contains a perfect matching. The paired-domination number of G, denoted by γ _pr(G), is the minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set of G. In [Dorbec P, Gravier S, Henning MA, J Comb Optim 14(1):1–7, 2007], the authors gave tight bounds for paired-dominating sets of generalized claw-free graphs. Yet, the critical cases are not claws but subdivided stars. We here give a bound for graphs containing no induced subdivided stars, depending on the size of the star.     

Saturated graphs with minimal number of edges

Let F = {F₁,…} be a given class of forbidden graphs. A graph G is called F-saturated if no F_i ∈ F is a subgraph of G but the addition of an arbitrary new edge gives a forbidden subgraph. In this paper the minimal number of edges in F-saturated graphs is examined. General estimations are given and the structure of minimal graphs is described for some special forbidden graphs (stars, paths, m pairwise disjoint edges).     

Long cycles and spanning subgraphs of locally maximal 1-planar graphs

A graph is 1-planar if it has a drawing in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once by another edge. Moreover, if this drawing has the additional property that for each crossing of two edges the end vertices of these edges induce a complete subgraph, then the graph is locally maximal 1-planar. For a 3-connected locally maximal 1-planar graph G, we show the existence of a spanning 3-connected planar subgraph and prove that G is Hamiltonian if G has at most three 3-vertex-cuts, and that G is traceable if G has at most four 3-vertex-cuts. Moreover, infinitely many nontraceable 5-connected 1-planar graphs are presented.     

On large light graphs in families of polyhedral graphs

A graph H is said to be light in a family H of graphs if each graph G∈H containing a subgraph isomorphic to H contains also an isomorphic copy of H such that each its vertex has the degree (in G) bounded above by a finite number φ(H,H) depending only on H and H. We prove that in the family of all 3-connected plane graphs of minimum degree 5 (or minimum face size 5, respectively), the paths with certain small graphs attached to one of its ends are light.     

Cochromatic Number and the Genus of a Graph

The cochromatic number of a graph G, denoted by z(G), is the minimum number of subsets into which the vertex set of G can be partitioned so that each sbuset induces an empty or a complete subgraph of G. In this paper we introduce the problem of determining for a surface S, z(S), which is the maximum cochromatic number among all graphs G that embed in S. Some general bounds are obtained; for example, it is shown that if S is orientable of genus at least one, or if S is nonorientable of genus at least four, then z(S) is nonorientable of genus at least four, then z(S)≤χ(S). Here χ(S) denotes the chromatic number S. Exact results are obtained for the sphere, the Klein bottle, and for S. It is conjectured that z(S) is equal to the maximum n for which the graph G_n = K₁ ∪ K₂ ∪ … ∪ K_n embeds in S.     

Fault Tolerance of Cayley Graphs

It is a difficult problem in general to decide whether a Cayley graph Cay(G; S) is connected where G is an arbitrary finite group and S a subset of G. For example, testing primitivity of an element in a finite field is a special case of this problem but notoriously hard. In this paper, it is shown that if a Cayley graph Cay(G; S) is known to be connected then its fault tolerance can be determined in polynomial time in |S|log(|G|). This is accomplished by establishing a new structural result for Cayley graphs. This result also yields a simple proof of optimal fault tolerance for an infinite class of Cayley graphs, namely exchange graphs. We also use the proof technique for our structural result to give a new proof of a known result on quasiminimal graphs. Received March 10, 2006     

Almost reconstructing infinite,rayless graphs

We show that for every infinite, rayless graph G the following holds. If G is hypomorphic to H then G is isomorphic to an induced subgraph of G. This proves a conjecture of R. Halin for the class of infinite, rayless graphs and partly extends a result of Bondy and Hemminger. The proof makes use of the structure theory for rayless graphs which was developed by the author in a previous paper.     

Connected Domination Stable Graphs Upon Edge Addition

Abstract

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a connected dominating set of G if S dominates G and the subgraph induced by S is connected. We study the graphs for which adding any edge does not change the connected domination number.