Kripke submodels and universal sentences

We define two notions for intuitionistic predicate logic: that of a submodel of a Kripke model, and that of a universal sentence. We then prove a corresponding preservation theorem. If a Kripke model is viewed as a functor from a small category to the category of all classical models with (homo)morphisms between them, then we define a submodel of a Kripke model to be a restriction of the original Kripke model to a subcategory of its domain, where every node in the subcategory is mapped to a classical submodel of the corresponding classical model in the range of the original Kripke model. We call a sentence universal if it is built inductively from atoms (including ? and ⊥) using ∧, ∨, ?, and →, with the restriction that antecedents of → must be atomic. We prove that an intuitionistic theory is axiomatized by universal sentences if and only if it is preserved under Kripke submodels. We also prove the following analogue of a classical model‐consistency theorem: The universal fragment of a theory Γ is contained in the universal fragment of a theory Δ if and only if every rooted Kripke model of Δ is strongly equivalent to a submodel of a rooted Kripke model of Γ. Our notions of Kripke submodel and universal sentence are natural in the sense that in the presence of the rule of excluded middle, they collapse to the classical notions of submodel and universal sentence. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Sémantique de type Kripke d'un système logique basé sur un ensemble ordonné fini

In order to modelize the reasoning of intelligent agents represented by a poset T, H. Rasiowa introduced logic systems called “Approximation Logics”. In these systems the use of a set of constants constitutes a fundamental tool. We have introduced in [8] a logic system called without this kind of constants but limited to the case that T is a finite poset. We have proved a completeness result for this system w.r.t. an algebraic semantics. We introduce in this paper a Kripke‐style semantics for a subsystem of for which there existes a deduction theorem. The set of “possible worldsr is enriched by a family of functions indexed by the elements of T and satisfying some conditions. We prove a completeness result for system with respect to this Kripke semantics and define a finite Kripke structure that characterizes the propositional fragment of logic . We introduce a reational semantics (found by E. Orlowska) which has the advantage to allow an interpretation of the propositionnal logic using only binary relations. We treat also the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem of the propositional fragment of logic .     

Incompleteness Results in Kripke Bundle Semantics

Kripke bundle and C-set semantics are known as semantics which generalize standard Kripke semantics. In [4] and in [1, 2] it is shown that Kripke bundle and C-set semantics are stronger than standard Kripke semantics. Also it is true that C-set semantics for superintuitionistic logics is stronger than Kripke bundle semantics ([6]). Modal predicate logic Q-S4.1 is not Kripke bundle complete ([3] - it is also yielded as a corollary to Theorem 6.1(a) of the present paper). This is shown by using difference of Kripke bundle semantics and C-set semantics. In this paper, by using the same idea we show that incompleteness results in Kripke bundle semantics which are extended versions of [2].     

Interpreting Intuitionistic Propositional Logic in Terms of Intuitionistic Protothetics

An algebra of sentences of the quite intuitionistic protothetics, that is, an intuitionistic propositional logic with quantifiers augmented by the negation of the excluded middle, is a faithful model of intuitionistic propositional logic.     

Preservation theorems for Kripke models

There are several ways for defining the notion submodel for Kripke models of intuitionistic first‐order logic. In our approach a Kripke model A is a submodel of a Kripke model B if they have the same frame and for each two corresponding worlds A^α and B^α of them, A^α is a subset of B^α and forcing of atomic formulas with parameters in the smaller one, in A and B, are the same. In this case, B is called an extension of A. We characterize theories that are preserved under taking submodels and also those that are preserved under taking extensions as universal and existential theories, respectively. We also study the notion elementary submodel defined in the same style and give some results concerning this notion. In particular, we prove that the relation between each two corresponding worlds of finite Kripke models A ≤ B is elementary extension (in the classical sense) (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Relating Categorical Semantics for Intuitionistic Linear Logic

There are several kinds of linear typed calculus in the literature, some with their associated notion of categorical model. Our aim in this paper is to systematise the relationship between three of these linear typed calculi and their models. We point out that mere soundness and completeness of a linear typed calculus with respect to a class of categorical models are not sufficient to identify the most appropriate class uniquely. We recommend instead to use the notion of internal language when relating a typed calculus to a class of models. After clarifying the internal languages of the categories of models in the literature we relate these models via reflections and coreflections. Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000) 03G30, 03B15, 18C50, 03B20.     

A Basis in Semi‐Reduced Form for the Admissible Rules of the Intuitionistic Logic IPC

We study the problem of finding a basis for all rules admissible in the intuitionistic propositional logic IPC. The main result is Theorem 3.1 which gives a basis consisting of all rules in semi‐reduced form satisfying certain specific additional requirements. Using developed technique we also find a basis for rules admissible in the logic of excluded middle law KC.     

Some Connections between Topological and Modal Logic

We study modal logics based on neighbourhood semantics using methods and theorems having their origin in topological model theory. We thus obtain general results concerning completeness of modal logics based on neighbourhood semantics as well as the relationship between neighbourhood and Kripke semantics. We also give a new proof for a known interpolation result of modal logic using an interpolation theorem of topological model theory.     

Specialization of Loop Rules of a Sequent Calculus of Intuitionistic Temporal Logic with Time Gaps

The paper deals with the loop-rule problem in the first-order intuitionistic temporal logic sequent calculus LBJ. The calculus LBJT is intended for the specialization of the antecedent implication rule. The invertibility of some of the LBJT rules and the syntactic admissibility of the structural rules and the cut rule in LBJT, as well as the equivalence of LBJ and LBJT, are proved. The calculus LBJT2 is intended for the specialization of the antecedent universal quantifier and antecedent box rules. The decidability of LBJT2 is proved.     

Minimal Axiomatization in Modal Logic

We consider the problem of finding, in the ambit of modal logic, a minimal characterization for finite Kripke frames, i.e., a formula which, given a frame, axiomatizes its theory employing the lowest possible number of variables and implies the other axiomatizations. We show that every finite transitive frame admits a minimal characterization over K4, and that this result can not be extended to K.     

Kripke‐style semantics for many‐valued logics

This paper deals with Kripke‐style semantics for many‐valued logics. We introduce various types of Kripke semantics, and we connect them with algebraic semantics. As for modal logics, we relate the axioms of logics extending MTL to properties of the Kripke frames in which they are valid. We show that in the propositional case most logics are complete but not strongly complete with respect to the corresponding class of complete Kripke frames, whereas in the predicate case there are important many‐valued logics like BL, ? and Π, which are not even complete with respect to the class of all predicate Kripke frames in which they are valid. Thus although very natural, Kripke semantics seems to be slightly less powerful than algebraic semantics. (© 2003 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

A secondary semantics for Second Order Intuitionistic Propositional Logic

In this paper we propose a Kripke‐style semantics for second order intuitionistic propositional logic and we provide a semantical proof of the disjunction and the explicit definability property. Moreover, we provide a tableau calculus which is sound and complete with respect to such a semantics. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Corrigendum to “Kripke‐style semantics for many‐valued logics”

This note contains a correct proof of the fact that the set of all first‐order formulas which are valid in all predicate Kripke frames for Hájek's many‐valued logic BL is not arithmetical. The result was claimed in [5], but the proof given there was incorrect. (© 2003 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Full Models for Positive Modal Logic

The positive fragment of the local modal consequence relation defined by the class of all Kripke frames is studied in the context of Abstract Algebraic Logic. It is shown that this fragment is non‐protoalgebraic and that its class of canonically associated algebras according to the criteria set up in [7] is the class of positive modal algebras. Moreover its full models are characterized as the models of the Gentzen calculus introduced in [3].     

量词模态逻辑的代数语义学（Ⅲ）──关于不含Barcan公式的正规模态系统的情形

本文首先讨论嵌套论域语义的相应代数语义并由Ｈｕｇｈｅｓ和Ｃｒｅｓｓｗｅｌｌ在［５］中建立的关于具有嵌套论域的正规量词模态系统的关系语义完全性定理推出其相应的代数语义完全性定理：然后对于具有任意可变论域语义的正规系统，我们用Ｈｅｎｋｉｎ方法给出其关于狭义Ｋｒｉｐｋｅ语义的关系语义完全性定理，由此通过将关系语义转化为代数语义从而亦推得其代数语义完全性定理。     

直觉主义量词模态逻辑系统MIPC~*的可靠性定理

设WMμ为系统MIPC*全部公式的集,再设г∪{A} WMμ,则гMIPC* A意义明显.而 M A指гM-蕴涵A.以前已证明гM A гMIPC*A,即MIPC*为强完全的.本文证明其逆定理成立,即гMIPC*A гM A.是为MIPC*的可靠性定理.