Conception of expert mathematics teacher: a comparative study between Hong Kong and Chongqing

This paper reports the similarities and differences in how “expert mathematics teacher” is conceptualized by mathematics educators in Hong Kong and Chongqing, two cities in China which share similar but different cultural and social backgrounds. Thirty-seven mathematics education researchers, school principals with mathematics education background, and mathematics teachers were interviewed on their perceptions of expert mathematics teacher. It is found that in both cities an expert mathematics teacher should have a profound knowledge base in mathematics, teaching, and students; strong ability in teaching; and a noble personality and a spirit of life-long learning. As for differences, an expert mathematics teacher should have the ability to conduct research, mentor other teachers, and have profound knowledge of examination and educational theories in Chongqing. These attributes were not found in Hong Kong. These similarities and differences are discussed, and relevant social and cultural factors in the two contexts are examined.     

Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: the productive notion of mathematics laboratories

In our research work, we have looked at the way in which artefacts become, for teachers as well as for students, instruments of their mathematical activity. The issues related to the use of tools and technologies in mathematical education are now widely considered. A look to history highlights the different ways in which the same questions have been studied at different times and in different places. This suggests that the contribution of artefacts to mathematics learning should be considered in terms of various contexts. Our “visits” to these contexts will be guided by the coordination of two main theoretical frameworks, the instrumental approach and the semiotic mediation approach from the perspective of mathematics laboratory. This journey through history and schooling represents a good occasion to address some questions: Are there “good” contexts in which to develop mathematical instruments? Are there “good” teaching practices which assist students’ instrumental geneses and construct mathematical meanings? How is it possible to promote such teaching practices? Some study cases are discussed.     

Hong Kong teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning

Twelve experienced mathematics teachers in Hong Kong were invited to face-to-face semi-structured interviews to express their views about mathematics, about mathematics learning and about the teacher and teaching. Mathematics was generally regarded as a subject that is practical, logical, useful and involves thinking. In view of the abstract nature of the subject, the teachers took abstract thinking as the goal of mathematics learning. They reflected that it is not just a matter of “how” and “when”, but one should build a path so that students can proceed from the concrete to the abstract. Their conceptions of mathematics understanding were tapped. Furthermore, the roles of memorisation, practices and concrete experiences were discussed, in relation with understanding. Teaching for understanding is unanimously supported and along this line, the characteristics of an effective mathematics lesson and of an effective mathematics teacher were discussed. Though many of the participants realize that there is no fixed rule for good practices, some of the indicators were put forth. To arrive at an effective mathematics lesson, good preparation, basic teaching skills and good relationship with the students are prerequisite.     

Cross-national comparisons of mathematics curriculum materials: what might we learn?

In most of the world, there is a broad public interest in cross-national comparisons. Despite the myriad difficulties inherent in such comparisons, and despite the fact that most studies explicitly acknowledge limited generalizability, news media representatives, policy makers, politicians and educators often take the findings at face value as providing solid scientific evidence of the achievement of students in the countries studied. This often leads in turn to superficial commentaries and unhelpful recommendations. Our task as scholars of mathematics education is to demonstrate the nuanced complexity of such comparisons. The papers in this issue of ZDM succeed in this regard. Using a range of scholarly perspectives (mathematical, psychological and socio-cultural), the authors offer many insightful observations regarding curriculum and curriculum materials in East Asian countries (especially China) and the USA, with careful attention to the central role of curriculum in the teaching and learning of mathematics in schools. In this commentary study I discuss a few of these insights and develop one illustrative example of how cross-national comparative analyses such as these could be used to sensibly inform policy discussions related to changes in mathematics curriculum, teaching, or teacher preparation.     

The relationship between mathematicians’ pedagogical goals,orientations, and common teaching practices in advanced mathematics

Despite mathematics educators’ research into more effective modes of teaching, lecture is still the dominant mode of instruction in undergraduate mathematics courses. Surveys suggest this is because most mathematicians believe this is the best way to teach. This paper answers a call by mathematics education researchers to explore mathematicians’ needs and goals concerning teaching. We interviewed eight mathematicians about findings in the mathematics education research literature concerning common pedagogical practices of instructors of advanced mathematics classes: “chalk talk,” the presentation of formal and informal content, and teacher questioning. We then analyzed the responses for resources, orientations, and goals that might influence the participants to engage in these practices. We describe how participants believed common lecturing practices allowed them to achieve their goals and aligned with their orientations. We discuss these findings in depth and consider what implications they may have for researchers that aim to change mathematicians’ teaching practices.     

Elementary mathematics specialists in “departmentalized” teaching assignments: Affordances and constraints

In this article, we describe the experiences of three Elementary Mathematics Specialists (EMS) who were part of a larger project investigating the impact of EMS certification and assignment (self-contained or “departmentalized”) on teaching practices and student achievement outcomes. All three of the teachers were “departmentalized,” in the sense that each was responsible for teaching mathematics to at least two groups of students, and accordingly, did not teach all subjects as would a typical self-contained elementary teacher. Each teacher had recently earned an Elementary Mathematics Specialist certificate through completion of a 24-credit, graduate-level program designed to build pedagogical content knowledge and leadership capacity in mathematics. Through a series of observations and interviews over the course of one school year, we examined how the teachers described and navigated specific affordances and constraints they encountered in their particular contexts. Common affordances included opportunities to revise and learn from instruction, and constraints included reduced flexibility introduced by the need to schedule multiple classes of mathematics. Despite these common features, we found important differences between the three models of departmentalization, which we describe as team approach, class swap, and grade-level mathematics teacher. For example, some of the models provided more opportunities for collaboration while others made it difficult for teachers to address potential inequities in learning opportunities across sections. Despite the constraints of their respective models, we found evidence of the EMS-certified teachers drawing on professional expertise in mathematics to meet student needs.     

Online education for in-service secondary teachers and the incorporation of mathematics technology in the classroom

This paper reviews existing research on how in-service high school teachers have learned about, worked on or thought about the incorporation of mathematics technology into their teaching practices. The paper reviews different scenarios of instruction issuing from important research related to teacher professional development. Specifically, we will deal with contributions to online in-service mathematics teacher education that refer to the use of digital technologies in classroom teaching practices. The different articles reviewed belong to a range of teams of researchers from several universities and countries, and who have implemented distinct online education approaches. That work has allowed the gaining of knowledge on the specificities of using Web 2.0 tools for mathematics professional development (MPD), the function that online teacher interaction has in teacher learning, and the actual classroom conditions in which mathematics technology is incorporated into instructional practice. This paper describes and discusses the design features of those approaches emphasizing the main concepts and their underpinning theoretical frames, noting important design elements, and specific results. Finally, the paper discusses how some of these research findings are connected with emergent issues in the field of MPD.     

Mathematics professional development as design for boundary encounters

This theoretical paper examines a process for researchers and teachers to exchange knowledge. We use the concepts of communities of practice, boundary encounters, and boundary objects to conceptualize this process within mathematics professional development (MPD). We also use the ideas from design research to discuss how mathematics professional development researchers can make professional development the focus of their research. In particular, we examine the question: How can MPD be conceptualized and designed around research-based knowledge in ways that promote knowledge exchange about students’ mathematics and mathematics learning among researchers and teachers to improve the practices of both the research and the teaching communities? We propose that MPD is a premier space for researchers and teachers to exchange knowledge from their communities, impacting both researchers’ and teachers’ practices without reducing the importance of either.     

Mathematics teaching expertise development approaches and practices: similarities and differences between Western and Eastern countries

This paper comments on the other papers in this issue related to how “mathematics teaching expertise” is conceptualized and the approaches employed to facilitate its development in Western and Eastern countries. Similarities and differences are found to exist in the conceptualization of mathematics teaching expertise and the development approaches employed. The papers in this issue share the similarity of exploring mathematics teaching expertise from the perspective of knowledge. Under the influence of this perspective, the approaches mentioned in the papers mainly focus on the development of teachers’ knowledge. A feature in common among teacher development approaches employed in Western countries is to let teachers attend some courses or training programs designed or organized by mathematics teacher educators at universities. In contrast, teacher development approaches employed in Eastern countries, particularly those employed in Mainland China, are relatively more practical in nature and directly related to teachers’ needs, like learning from observing exemplary teaching. This shows that the conception of mathematics teaching expertise and development approaches are culturally and contextually dependent. It is argued that a broader perspective of mathematics teaching expertise should be taken to explore mathematics teaching expertise and its development, and teacher expertise development should be conceptualized as a complex system rather than as some separated knowledge, skills and techniques.     

A Sino-German semi-virtual seminar in mathematics education

In summer 2006 the University of Education in Weingarten, Germany, and East China Normal University, Shanghai, performed a semi-virtual seminar with mathematics students on “Mathematics and Architecture”. The goal was the joint development of teaching materials for German or Chinese school, based on different buildings such as “Nanpu Bridge”, or the “Eiffel Tower”. The purpose of the seminar was to provide a learning environment for students supported by using information and communication technology (ICT) to understand how the hidden mathematics in buildings should be related to school mathematics; to experience the multicultural potential of the international language “Mathematics”; to develop “media competence” while communicating with others and using technologies in mathematics education; and to recognize the differences in teaching mathematics between the two cultures. In this paper we will present our ideas, experiences and results from the seminar.     

Beliefs and beyond: affect and the teaching and learning of mathematics

The importance of beliefs for the teaching and learning of mathematics is widely recognized among mathematics educators. In this special issue, we explicitly address what we call “beliefs and beyond” to indicate the larger field surrounding beliefs in mathematics education. This is done to broaden the discussion to related concepts (which may not originate in mathematics education) and to consider the interconnectedness of concepts. In particular, we present some new developments at the conceptual level, address different approaches to investigate beliefs, highlight the role of student beliefs in problem-solving activities, and discuss teacher beliefs and their significance for professional development. One specific intention is to consider expertise from colleagues in the fields of educational research and psychology, side by side with perspectives provided by researchers from mathematics education.     

Gender justice,human rights and measurement in the mathematics classroom

In line with international trends, the new South African mathematics curriculum implores mathematics educators to realize a pedagogy in their classrooms that is more practical, activity-oriented, and connected to their learners' lives. Drawing on data from a larger study that explores theory–practice relations in mathematics education, this paper shows how such progressive practices, when interpreted with respect to the teaching of measurement which required learners to use different measuring instruments for measuring the school grounds in learning about length and perimeter, were found to be deeply gendered. In two different contexts of an ‘African' township school and a predominantly ‘Indian' suburban school, girls in a grade 6 mathematics classroom faced direct sexism as they struggled to take the opportunity to participate in the activity and learn how to measure – an important mathematical competence and everyday knowledge and skill. The article analyses the data with reference to the human rights imperatives of the new national curricula and approaches to addressing disadvantage and discrimination for girls in mathematics classrooms.     

Language and communication in mathematics education: an overview of research in the field

Within the field of mathematics education, the central role language plays in the learning, teaching, and doing of mathematics is increasingly recognised, but there is not agreement about what this role (or these roles) might be or even about what the term ‘language’ itself encompasses. In this issue of ZDM, we have compiled a collection of scholarship on language in mathematics education research, representing a range of approaches to the topic. In this survey paper, we outline a categorisation of ways of conceiving of language and its relevance to mathematics education, the theoretical resources drawn upon to systematise these conceptions, and the methodological approaches employed by researchers. We identify four broad areas of concern in mathematics education that are addressed by language-oriented research: analysis of the development of students’ mathematical knowledge; understanding the shaping of mathematical activity; understanding processes of teaching and learning in relation to other social interactions; and multilingual contexts. A further area of concern that has not yet received substantial attention within mathematics education research is the development of the linguistic competencies and knowledge required for participation in mathematical practices. We also discuss methodological issues raised by the dominance of English within the international research community and suggest some implications for researchers, editors and publishers.     

Immigrant parents’ perspectives on their children’s mathematics education

This paper draws on two research studies with similar theoretical backgrounds, in two different settings, Barcelona (Spain) and Tucson (USA). From a sociocultural perspective, the analysis of mathematics education in multilingual and multiethnic classrooms requires us to consider contexts, such as the family context, that have an influence on these classrooms and its participants. We focus on immigrant parents' perspectives on their children's mathematics education and we primarily discuss two topics (1) their experiences with the teaching of mathematics, and (2) the role of language (native language and second language). The two topics are explored with reference to the immigrant student's or their parents' former educational systems (the “before”) and their current educational systems (the “now”). Parents and schools understand educational systems, classroom cultures and students' attainment differently, as influenced by their sociocultural histories and contexts.     

问题驱动 多元表征的概念教学探究——对偶线性规划教学案例设计

数学与应用数学(师范)专业中的《运筹学》具有跨学科、实践性的课程特点,目标在于培养职前教师用数学方法解决实际问题的能力.结合义务教育阶段新课程标准中"四基"的提出这一背景,本文将以线性规划部分(运筹数学)对偶线性规划概念的引入这一知识模块为例,探讨通过问题串形式进行问题驱动、多元表征的概念教学过程.即遵循问题驱动—兴趣驱动—问题意识发展—提出和解决新问题,依据数学与外部联系、数学内部联系两条主线设计教学和学习,探索如何通过问题驱动、多元表征的结构化教学过程引导学生的学习方式发生改变,增强探究学习的动机,发展问题解决能力.课堂教学实践证明效果优于以往单一的讲授式教学法,一定程度上提高了学生的学业成绩、应用问题的兴趣和问题解决意识.     

The relationship of theory and practice in mathematics teacher professional development: an activity theory perspective

This paper describes certain interactions between the activity of “teaching” and the activity of “researching” in which the teachers participate in a 52-h professional development course aiming to introduce them to research in mathematics education as a tool for inquiry in their teaching. The teachers are involved in different research tasks such as: reading and presenting research papers; analyzing classroom dialogues and tasks; and designing, implementing, and evaluating collaboratively a classroom teaching intervention. From an activity theory (AT) perspective, and in particular Engeström’s (2001) third generation AT, distinguish two activity systems, the activity system of research and the activity system of teaching, to identify links that the participating teachers make. These links indicate the development of an inquiring stance to mathematics teaching and learning as a means of professional learning.     

Adult Education and Ethnomathematics: appropriating results, methods, and principles

This article aims at discussing the ways that Youth and Adult Education have been taking on the production, methods and principles of Ethnomathematics in the last decades, especially in Brazil. First, it focuses on how Youth and Adult educators found Ethnomathematics to be a resource to know their students and the mathematics they use and produce better. The second part discusses how intercultural studies undertaken by Ethnomathematics research offered a new perspective under which mathematics knowledge and educational practices of Youth and Adult Education are conceived. Finally, the interlocutive and interdiscursive dimensions of teaching and learning practices are approached to present a reflection about the relations among Youth and Adult Education, Ethnomathematics and the search for the meanings of teaching and learning mathematics at school into an Inclusion project.     

Inquiry Teaching and Learning: The Best Math Class Study

This research reports on prospective middle school teachers' perceptions of a “best mathematics class” during their involvement in an inquiry‐designed mathematics content course. Grounded in the prestigious Glenn Commission report ( U.S. Department of Education, 2000 ), the study examined the prospective teachers' perceptions of effective mathematics instruction both prior to and after completing the inquiry course. Pre‐essay analysis revealed that students could be grouped into one of two categories: the Watch‐Learn‐Practice view and the Self as Initiator view. Post‐essay analysis indicated that over two thirds of all students involved in the study changed their views of a best math class after the inquiry courses. The Watch‐Learn‐Practice group's changes focused on developing reasoning skills and learning how one “knows” in mathematics. The Self as Initiator group noted expanded roles for the students, particularly emphasizing the importance of going beyond basic requirements to think deeply about the why and how of mathematics and expanded views of the benefits of group learning.     

Mathematics teachers’ specialized knowledge: a secondary teacher's knowledge of rational numbers

Recognising teachers’ knowledge as one of the main factors influencing their practices and student learning, we aim to contribute to obtaining a better and deeper understanding of the specificities of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. A case study involving one 8th-grade Chilean mathematics teacher is presented in the context of rational numbers. Using video and audio recordings of classroom practices, questionnaires, and an interview, we sought to characterise, and better understand the content of the Knowledge of Topics from the perspective of the Mathematics Teachers’ Specialized Knowledge (MTSK) theoretical framework. The results reveal some critical aspects that teacher education should focus on, while also identifying lost opportunities and examples of “good” practices, thus contributing to the refinement of the MTSK conceptualisation. The conclusions can be considered in a broader perspective, with implications for teacher education in other contexts.