Maps preserving the nilpotency of products of operators

Let B(X) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on the Banach space X, and let N(X) be the set of nilpotent operators in B(X). Suppose ?:B(X)→B(X) is a surjective map such that A,B∈B(X) satisfy AB∈N(X) if and only if ?(A)?(B)∈N(X). If X is infinite dimensional, then there exists a map f:B(X)→C?{0} such that one of the following holds:

(a)

There is a bijective bounded linear or conjugate-linear operator S:X→X such that ? has the form A?S[f(A)A]S^-1.

(b)

The space X is reflexive, and there exists a bijective bounded linear or conjugate-linear operator S : X′ → X such that ? has the form A ? S[f(A)A′]S⁻¹.

If X has dimension n with 3 ? n < ∞, and B(X) is identified with the algebra M_n of n × n complex matrices, then there exist a map f:M_n→C?{0}, a field automorphism ξ:C→C, and an invertible S ∈ M_n such that ? has one of the following forms:

     

Strong linear preservers of rank reverse permutability on triangular matrices

Let F be a field with ∣F∣ > 2 and T_n(F) be the set of all n × n upper triangular matrices, where n ? 2. Let k ? 2 be a given integer. A k-tuple of matrices A₁, …, A_k ∈ T_n(F) is called rank reverse permutable if rank(A₁ A₂ ? A_k) = rank(A_k A_k−1 ? A₁). We characterize the linear maps on T_n(F) that strongly preserve the set of rank reverse permutable matrix k-tuples.     

Lower bounds of Copson type for Hausdorff matrices

Let 1 ? p ? ∞, 0 < q ? p, and A = (a_n,k)_n,k?0 ? 0. Denote by L_p,q(A) the supremum of those L satisfying the following inequality:

     

Eigenvalues and degree deviation in graphs

Let G be a graph with n vertices and m edges and let μ(G) = μ₁(G) ? ? ? μ_n(G) be the eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix. Set s(G)=∑_u∈V(G)∣d(u)-2m/n∣. We prove that

     

On classical adjoint-commuting mappings between matrix algebras

Let F be a field and let m and n be integers with m,n?3. Let M_n denote the algebra of n×n matrices over F. In this note, we characterize mappings ψ:M_n→M_m that satisfy one of the following conditions:

1.

|F|=2 or |F|>n+1, and ψ(adj(A+αB))=adj(ψ(A)+αψ(B)) for all A,B∈M_n and α∈F with ψ(I_n)≠0.

2.

ψ is surjective and ψ(adj(A-B))=adj(ψ(A)-ψ(B)) for every A,B∈M_n.

Here, adjA denotes the classical adjoint of the matrix A, and I_n is the identity matrix of order n. We give examples showing the indispensability of the assumption ψ(I_n)≠0 in our results.     

Coherence relative to a weak torsion class

Let R be a ring. A subclass T of left R-modules is called a weak torsion class if it is closed under homomorphic images and extensions. Let T be a weak torsion class of left R-modules and n a positive integer. Then a left R-module M is called T-finitely generated if there exists a finitely generated submodule N such that M/N ∈ T; a left R-module A is called (T,n)-presented if there exists an exact sequence of left R-modules

$$0 \to {K_{n - 1}} \to {F_{n - 1}} \to \cdots \to {F_1} \to {F_0} \to M \to 0$$

such that F₀,..., F_n?1 are finitely generated free and K_n?1 is T-finitely generated; a left R-module M is called (T,n)-injective, if Ext ⁿ _R (A,M) = 0 for each (T, n+1)-presented left R-module A; a right R-module M is called (T,n)-flat, if Tor ^R _n (M,A) = 0 for each (T, n+1)-presented left R-module A. A ring R is called (T,n)-coherent, if every (T, n+1)-presented module is (n + 1)-presented. Some characterizations and properties of these modules and rings are given.

     

Proof of conjecture involving the second largest signless Laplacian eigenvalue and the index of graphs

Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph. Denote by D(G) the diagonal matrix of its vertex degrees and by A(G) its adjacency matrix. Then the signless Laplacian matrix of G is Q(G) = D(G) + A(G). In [5], Cvetkovi? et al. have given the following conjecture involving the second largest signless Laplacian eigenvalue (q₂) and the index (λ₁) of graph G (see also Aouchiche and Hansen [1]):

     

Accretive operators and Cassels inequality

Let a,b>0 and let Z∈M_n(R) such that Z lies into the operator ball of diameter [aI,bI]. Then for all positive definite A∈M_n(R),

     

Relative copure injective and copure flat modules

Let R be a ring, n a fixed nonnegative integer and I_n (F_n) the class of all left (right) R-modules of injective (flat) dimension at most n. A left R-module M (resp., right R-module F) is called n-copure injective (resp., n-copure flat) if (resp., ) for any N∈I_n. It is shown that a left R-module M over any ring R is n-copure injective if and only if M is a kernel of an I_n-precover f:A→B of a left R-module B with A injective. For a left coherent ring R, it is proven that every right R-module has an F_n-preenvelope, and a finitely presented right R-module M is n-copure flat if and only if M is a cokernel of an F_n-preenvelope K→F of a right R-module K with F flat. These classes of modules are also used to construct cotorsion theories and to characterize the global dimension of a ring under suitable conditions.     

On multilinear polynomials in four variables evaluated on matrices

Let K   be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 and let _Mn(K)$M_n(K)$, n?3$n?3$, be the matrix ring over K  . We will show that the image of any multilinear polynomial in four variables evaluated on _Mn(K)$M_n(K)$ contains all matrices of trace 0.     

Linear maps preserving M–P inverses of matrices between matrix spaces over fields

Suppose F is a field of characteristic not 2. Let n and m be two arbitrary positive integers with n≥2. We denote by M _n (F) and S _n (F) the space of n×n full matrices and the space of n×n symmetric matrices over F, respectively. All linear maps from S _n (F) to M _m (F) preserving M–P inverses of matrices are characterized first, and thereby all linear maps from S _n (F) (M _n (F)) to S _m (F) (M _m (F)) preserving M–P inverses of matrices are characterized, respectively.     

On the span of Hadamard products of vectors

Let A₁, … , A_k be positive semidefinite matrices and B₁, … , B_k arbitrary complex matrices of order n. We show that

span{(A₁x)°(A₂x)°?°(A_kx)|x∈Cⁿ}=range(A₁°A₂°?°A_k)     

The zeros of a quadratic form at square-free points

Let F(x₁,…,xn) be a nonsingular indefinite quadratic form, n=3 or 4. For n=4, suppose the determinant of F is a square. Results are obtained on the number of solutions of

F(x₁,…,xn)=0     

The growth, oscillation and fixed points of solutions of complex linear differential equations in the unit disc

We consider the complex differential equations of the form

Ak(z)f(k)+Ak−1(z)f(k−1)+?+A₁(z)f^′+A₀(z)f=F(z),     

k-Potence preserving maps without the linearity and surjectivity assumptions

Let M_n be the space of all n × n complex matrices, and let Γ_n be the subset of M_n consisting of all n × n k-potent matrices. We denote by Ψ_n the set of all maps on M_n satisfying A − λB ∈ Γ_n if and only if ?(A) − λ?(B) ∈ Γ_n for every A,B ∈ M_n and λ ∈ C. It was shown that ? ∈ Ψ_n if and only if there exist an invertible matrix P ∈ M_n and c ∈ C with c^k−1 = 1 such that either ?(A) = cPAP⁻¹ for every A ∈ M_n, or ?(A) = cPA^TP⁻¹ for every A ∈ M_n.     

The generalized superoptimal preconditioner

For any given n-by-n matrix A, a specific circulant preconditioner t_F(A) introduced by Tyrtyshnikov [E. Tyrtyshnikov, Optimal and super-optimal circulant preconditioners, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 13 (1992) 459-473] is defined to be the solution of

     

On idempotent <Emphasis Type="Italic">τ</Emphasis>-measurable operators affiliated to a von Neumann algebra

Let τ be a faithful normal semifinite trace on a von Neumann algebra M, let p, 0 < p < ∞, be a number, and let L_p(M, τ) be the space of operators whose pth power is integrable (with respect to τ). Let P and Q be τ-measurable idempotents, and let A ≡ P ? Q. In this case, 1) if A ≥ 0, then A is a projection and QA = AQ = 0; 2) if P is quasinormal, then P is a projection; 3) if Q ∈ M and A ∈ L_p(M, τ), then A² ∈ L_p(M, τ). Let n be a positive integer, n > 2, and A = Aⁿ ∈ M. In this case, 1) if A ≠ 0, then the values of the nonincreasing rearrangement μ_t(A) belong to the set {0} ∪ [‖A^n?2‖^?1, ‖A‖] for all t > 0; 2) either μ_t(A) ≥ 1 for all t > 0 or there is a t₀ > 0 such that μ_t(A) = 0 for all t > t₀. For every τ-measurable idempotent Q, there is aunique rank projection P ∈ M with QP = P, PQ = Q, and PM = QM. There is a unique decomposition Q = P + Z, where Z² = 0, ZP = 0, and PZ = Z. Here, if Q ∈ L_p(M, τ), then P is integrable, and τ(Q) = τ(P) for p = 1. If A ∈ L₁(M, τ) and if A = A³ and A ? A² ∈ M, then τ(A) ∈ R.     

Invariant random subgroups of linear groups

Let Γ < GL _n (_F) be a countable non-amenable linear group with a simple, center free Zariski closure. Let Sub(Γ) denote the space of all subgroups of Γ with the compact, metric, Chabauty topology. An invariant random subgroup (IRS) of Γ is a conjugation invariant Borel probability measure on Sub(Γ). An IRS is called non-trivial if it does not have an atom in the trivial group, i.e. if it is non-trivial almost surely. We denote by IRS⁰(Γ) the collection of all non-trivial IRS on Γ.

Theorem 0.1: With the above notation, there exists a free subgroup F < Γ and a non-discrete group topology on Γ such that for every μ ∈ IRS⁰(Γ) the following properties hold:

μ-almost every subgroup of Γ is open

• F ·Δ = Γ for μ-almost every Δ ∈ Sub(Γ).
• F ∩ Δ is infinitely generated, for every open subgroup. In particular, this holds for μ-almost every Δ ∈ Sub(Γ).
• The map

Φ: (Sub(Γ), μ) → (Sub(F),Φ*μ) Δ → Δ ∩ F is an F-invariant isomorphism of probability spaces.A more technical version of this theorem is valid for general countable linear groups. We say that an action of Γ on a probability space, by measure preserving transformations, is almost surely non-free (ASNF) if almost all point stabilizers are non-trivial.Corollary 0.2: Let Γ be as in the Theorem above. Then the product of finitely many ASNF Γ-spaces, with the diagonal Γ action, is ASNF.Corollary 0.3: Let Γ < GL_n(F) be a countable linear group, A Δ Γ the maximal normal amenable subgroup of Γ — its amenable radical. If μ ∈ IRS(Γ) is supported on amenable subgroups of Γ, then in fact it is supported on Sub(A). In particular, if A(Γ) = <e> then Δ = <e>, μ almost surely.