Five N′‐benzylidene‐N‐methylpyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazides

The compounds N′‐benzylidene‐N‐methylpyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazide, C₁₃H₁₂N₄O, (IIa), N′‐(2‐methoxybenzylidene)‐N‐methylpyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazide, C₁₄H₁₄N₄O₂, (IIb), N′‐(4‐cyanobenzylidene)‐N‐methylpyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazide dihydrate, C₁₄H₁₁N₅O·2H₂O, (IIc), N‐methyl‐N′‐(2‐nitrobenzylidene)pyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazide, C₁₃H₁₁N₅O₃, (IId), and N‐methyl‐N′‐(4‐nitrobenzylidene)pyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazide, C₁₃H₁₁N₅O₃, (IIe), have dihedral angles between the pyrazine rings and the benzene rings in the range 55–78°. These methylated pyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazides have supramolecular structures which are formed by weak C—H...O/N hydrogen bonds, with the exception of (IIc) which is hydrated. There are π–π stacking interactions in all five compounds. Three of these structures are compared with their nonmethylated counterparts, which have dihedral angles between the pyrazine rings and the benzene rings in the range 0–6°.     

Radical polymerization of novel N‐substituted‐N‐vinylformamide derivatives with bulky chiral substitutents

A series of novel N‐substituted‐N‐vinylformamides were synthesized, and the effect of bulky substituents on their radical polymerizability and polymer structure were investigated. N‐(p‐Methoxybenzyl)‐N‐vinylformamide ( 3 ) and N‐cyclohexylmethyl‐N‐vinylformamide ( 4 ) generated polymers, while it was known that their N‐vinylacetamide derivatives did not. ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR analyses of poly( 3 ), however, revealed almost no difference among the various polymerization conditions, implying that the substituent bulkiness did not influence the polymer structures. On the other hand, the chiral polymers, which were obtained by the radical polymerization of N‐(S)‐2‐methylbutyl‐N‐vinylformamide ((S)‐ 5 ) and N‐(S)‐2,3‐dihydroxypropyl‐N‐vinylformamide ((S)‐ 7 ) at 0 °C, showed sharper spectral patterns than those obtained at higher polymerization temperatures. Furthermore, the intensities of their positive cotton effects on circular dichroism increased when the polymerization temperature was low, suggesting that the substituent bulkiness of (S)‐ 5 and (S)‐ 7 influenced the polymer structures, such as their stereoregularity and regioregularity. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2012     

Synthesis and NMR characteristics of N‐acetyl‐4‐nitro,N‐acetyl‐5‐nitro,N‐acetyl‐6‐nitro and N‐acetyl‐7‐nitrotryptophan methyl esters

N‐acetyl‐4‐nitrotryptophan methyl ester (2), N‐acetyl‐5‐nitrotryptophan methyl ester (3), N‐acetyl‐6‐nitrotryptophan methyl ester (4) and N‐acetyl‐7‐nitrotryptophan methyl ester (5) were synthesized through a modified malonic ester reaction of the appropriate nitrogramine analogs followed by methylation with BF₃‐methanol. Assignments of the ¹H and ¹³C NMR chemical shifts were made using a combination of ¹H–¹H COSY, ¹H–¹³C HETCOR and ¹H–¹³C selective INEPT experiments. Copyright © 2008 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd     

Hydrogen‐bonding patterns in three substituted N‐benzyl‐N‐(3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐5‐yl)acetamides

The molecules of N‐(3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐5‐yl)‐2‐chloro‐N‐(4‐methoxybenzyl)acetamide, C₂₃H₂₆ClN₃O₂, are linked into a chain of edge‐fused centrosymmetric rings by a combination of one C—H...O hydrogen bond and one C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bond. In N‐(3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐5‐yl)‐2‐chloro‐N‐(4‐chlorobenzyl)acetamide, C₂₂H₂₃Cl₂N₃O, a combination of one C—H...O hydrogen bond and two C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds, which utilize different aryl rings as the acceptors, link the molecules into sheets. The molecules of S‐[N‐(3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐5‐yl)‐N‐(4‐methylbenzyl)carbamoyl]methyl O‐ethyl carbonodithioate, C₂₆H₃₁N₃O₂S₂, are also linked into sheets, now by a combination of two C—H...O hydrogen bonds, both of which utilize the amide O atom as the acceptor, and two C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds, which utilize different aryl groups as the acceptors.     

Synthesis of Scopin Acetate and 6,7‐Didehydrohyoscyamin. Intramolecular Phenylsulfenylation of a Nonactivated Methylene Group of Ethyl N‐Demethyl‐3‐O‐(phenylthio)tropine‐N‐carboxylate

The synthesis of scopin acetate ( 6b ) and 6,7‐didehydrohyoscyamine ( 17 ) was achieved by using tropine ( 5 ) as the starting compound. Formal (phenylthio)‐radical transfer to the nonactivated 6‐position of ethyl N‐demethyl‐3‐O‐(phenylthio)tropine‐N‐carboxylate ( 9 ) by irradiation in the presence of hexabutyldistannane is a key step of this synthetic approach, involving ethyl 6,7‐didehydro‐N‐demethyltropine‐N‐carboxylate ( 15 ) as a synthetic intermediate (Schemes 3 and 5). The reaction of 9 with tributylstannane in the presence of ethyl acrylate, as a radicophilic olefin, involves Michael‐type alkylation at C(6) of the tropine skeleton affording ethyl N‐demethyl‐N‐(ethoxycarbonyl)tropine‐6‐propanoate ( 18 ) (Scheme 6).     

N‐Nitrosomelatonin

The title compound, N‐[2‐(5‐methoxy‐1‐nitro­so‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)­ethyl]­acet­amide, C₁₃H₁₅N₃O₃, an N‐nitroso derivative of melatonin, crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c space group. The mol­ecules are arranged in such a way that the aromatic rings are in a planar conformation, with the alkyl­amide side chains in a different plane, at a dihedral angle of 108.60 (6)°. The alkyl­amide chains are interconnected by hydrogen bonds, constituting an infinite array.     

Rearrangement products of 3‐methane­sulfonyl‐N‐methyl‐N‐nitro­aniline

Two isomeric products (C₈H₁₀N₂O₄S) of the rearrangement of 3‐methane­sulfonyl‐N‐methyl‐N‐nitro­aniline have been investigated, viz. 3‐methane­sulfonyl‐N‐methyl‐2‐nitro­aniline, which was the main product of the rearrangement, and 5‐methane­sulfonyl‐N‐methyl‐2‐nitro­aniline. In both mol­ecules, the aromatic rings are appreciably deformed towards ortho‐quinonoidal geometry by electronic and steric interactions. The crystal structure is stabilized, in both cases, by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

New Reactions of N‐tert‐Butylimines; Formation of N‐Heterocycles by Methyl Radical Elimination on Flash Vacuum Thermolysis of N‐Benzylidene‐ and N‐(2‐Pyridylmethylidene)‐tert‐butylamines

Thermal reactions of N‐benzylidene‐ and N‐(2‐pyridylmethylidene)‐tert‐butylamines ( 5 and 13 ) under FVT conditions have been investigated. Unexpectedly, at 800 °C, compound 5 yields 1,2‐dimethylindole and 3‐methylisoquinoline. In the reaction of 13 at 800 °C, 3‐methylimidazo[1,5‐a]pyridine was obtained as the major product. Mechanisms of these reactions have been proposed on the basis of DFT calculations. Furthermore, UV‐photoelectron spectroscopy combined with FVT has been applied for direct monitoring and characterization of the thermolysis products in situ.     

O‐Benzyl‐N‐tert‐butoxy­carbonyl‐N‐methyl‐l‐tyrosine

The crystal structure of the title compound, alternatively called 3‐[4‐(benzyl­oxy)­phenyl]‐2‐(N‐tert‐butoxy­car­bonyl‐N‐methyl­amino)­propi­onic acid, C₂₂H₂₇NO₅, has been studied in order to ex­amine the role of N‐methyl­ation as a determinant of peptide conformation. The conformation of the tert‐butoxy­carbonyl group is trans–trans. The side chain has a folded conformation and the two phenyl rings are effectively perpendicular to one another. The carboxyl­ate hydroxyl group and the urethane carbonyl group form a strong intermolecular O—H?O hydrogen bond.     

N‐Germyl derivatives of sulfacetamide and ortho‐(sulfonamido)phenylamines: characterization of N‐[o‐(N′,N′‐dimethylsulfonamido)phenyl]‐N‐dimesitylgermaimine

Triethylgermylation of sulfacetamide occurs on the sulfonamido nitrogen in competition with the 1,2 addition of the starting triethylgermyl dimethylamine on the carbonyl group. Thermal decomposition in the presence of dimethylamine yields N‐triethylgermylsulfanilamide. Stable 1:1 sulfacetamide–DBU and 1:1 sulfacetamide–Et₃N complexes were isolated and fully characterized in the course of dehydrochlorination reactions. o‐Sulfonamidophenylamine yields N,N′‐bis‐triethylgermylated derivatives, whereas o‐(N,N‐dimethylsulfonamido)phenylamine leads to monogermylated compounds. The N‐dimethylaminodimesitylgermyl derivative is thermally stable. Dehydrohalogenation of the N‐dimesitylfluorogermyl compound leads to the thermally stable but water sensitive N‐[o‐(N′,N′‐dimethylsulfonamido)phenyl]‐N‐dimesitylgermaimine. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

N‐(4‐Methyl­phenyl)‐N‐(5‐nitro­furfuryl)‐N‐prop‐2‐ynyl­amine

The title compound, C₁₅H₁₄N₂O₃, is the first example of a structurally determined tertiary amine with both N‐5‐nitro­furfuryl and N‐prop‐2‐ynyl moieties. The mol­ecule is not planar, i.e. the furan ring is inclined at an angle of 84.35 (4)° to the phenyl ring. The crystal structure is dominated by van der Waals forces. The terminal alkynyl group as the strongest C—H hydrogen‐bond donor is not involved in hydrogen‐bond formation.     

Heterobimetallische Komplexe von Lithium,Aluminium und Gold mit dem N‐[2‐N′,N′‐(Dimethylaminoethyl)‐N‐methyl‐aminoethyl]‐ferrocenyl‐Liganden (η5‐C5H5)Fe{η5‐C5H3[CH(CH3)N(CH3)CH2CH2NMe2]‐2}

Heterobimetallic Complexes of Lithium, Aluminum, and Gold with the N ‐[2‐ N ′, N ′‐(dimethylaminoethyl)‐ N ‐methyl‐aminoethyl]‐ferrocenyl Ligand (η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃[CH(CH₃)N(CH₃)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]‐2} N‐[2‐N′,N′‐(dimethylaminoethyl)‐N‐methyl‐aminoethyl]ferrocene FcN,NH ( 1 ) reacts with ⁿBuLi under formation of the lithium organyl (FcN,N)Li ( 2 ). At reactions of 2 with AlBr₃ and AuCl · PPh₃ the heterobimetallic organo derivatives (FcN,N)AlBr₂ ( 3 ), (FcN,N)Au · PPh₃ ( 4 ) are formed. A detailed characterization of 2 – 4 was carried out by single crystal x‐ray analyses as well as by NMR and Mößbauer spectroscopy.     

Effective Synthesis of N‐Arylformamide from α‐Halo‐N‐arylacetamides

A convenient synthetic method for N‐arylformamide derivatives was successfully developed by reacting α‐iodo‐N‐arylacetamides with formamide. This method was applicable to α‐iodo‐N‐arylacetamide substrates bearing electron‐donating or electron‐withdrawing groups, N‐(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol‐5‐yl)‐2‐iodoacetamide, 2‐iodo‐N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)acetamide, and 2‐iodo‐N‐(naphthalen‐4‐yl)acetamide to give the corresponding N‐arylformamides in moderate to excellent yields (65–94%). A plausible mechanism was proposed to account for the new transformation.     

Kinetics and mechanism for the formation of o‐carboxy(N‐methyl)‐benzohydroxamic acid in the cleavage of ethyl N‐[o‐(N‐methyl‐N‐hydroxycarbamoyl)‐benzoyl]carbamate in N‐methylhydroxylamine,acetate, and phosphate buffers

The rate of cleavage of ethyl N‐[o‐(N‐methyl‐N‐hydroxycarbamoyl)benzoyl]‐ carbamate (ENMBC) in the buffer solutions containing N‐methylhydroxylamine, acetate + N‐methylhydroxylamine, and phosphate + N‐methylhydroxylamine followed an irreversible consecutive reaction path: ENMBC where A and B represent N‐hydroxyl group cyclized product of ENMBC and o‐(N‐methyl‐N‐hydroxycarbamoyl)benzoic acid, respectively. Both rate constants k_{1 obs} and k_{2 obs} showed the presence of buffer catalysis, but buffer catalysis turned out to be weak in the presence N‐methylhydroxylamine buffer, while it was strong in the presence of acetate and phosphate ones. Buffer‐independent rate constants k₁₀ and k₂₀ increased linearly with the increase in a_OH with definite intercepts. The values of molar absorption coefficient of A , obtained under varying total buffer concentrations at a constant pH, showed the presence of a fast equilibrium: A + CH₃NHOH ? C , where C represents N‐[o‐(N‐methyl‐N‐hydroxycarbamoyl)methyl]benzohydroxamic acid. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 35: 427–437, 2003     

The Synthesis of N‐Glycosyl‐N′‐Pyrazolylmethylene Aminothioureas under a 4Å Molecular Sieve

A series of novel N‐glycosyl‐N′‐pyrazolylmethylene aminothioureas ( 4a‐4e, 5a‐5e ) were synthesized from N‐glycosyl‐N′‐aminothioureas ( 2a‐2d ) and 4‐formylpyrazole ( 3a‐3e ). Activated 4Å molecular sieves were adopted for dehydrated reagent to improve the reaction rate and yield. The structures of the new compounds were identified on the basis of IR, ¹H NMR and MS spectra. Simultaneously, the compounds were detected by fluorescence spectrophotometer and had preferable fluorescence activity, so they can be selected as a kind of novel fluorescence labeled derivative of sugar.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Novel N‐Alkylamine‐ and N‐Cycloalkylamine‐Derived 2‐Benzoyl‐N‐aminohydrazinecarbothioamides, 1,3,4‐Thiadiazoles and 1,2,4‐Triazole‐5(4H)thiones

4‐Aminomorpholine, 1‐aminopiperidine, and 1,1‐dimethylhydrazine were carried out in the corresponding methyl dithiocarbamates and those in turn in aminohydrazinethioamides, which under the influence of acid chlorides (benzoyl, 4‐chlorobenzoyl, 4‐fluorobenzoyl, 4‐methoxybenzoyl and 2‐furoyl) gave arylcarbonyl derivatives. Those compounds were cyclized in concentrated H₂SO₄ to 2‐(N‐cycloalkylamino‐ and N‐dimethylamino)‐amino‐5‐phenyl‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole derivatives and in 10% NaOH aqueous solution to 4‐cycloalkylamino‐ and 4‐dimethylamino‐3‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazole‐5(4H)‐thiones.     

Ene Reaction with Pummerer‐type Reaction Intermediate of α‐(Methylthio)‐N‐methoxy‐N‐methyl Acetamide: A New Synthesis of N‐methoxy‐N‐methyl‐(E,E)‐2,4‐dienamides

Pummerer‐type reaction intermediate 2 of α‐(methylthio)‐N‐methoxy‐N‐methyl acetamide (1) has been found to react with 1‐alkenes to afford ene adducts 3 . N‐Methoxy‐N‐methyl‐(E,E)‐2,4‐dienamides were synthesized from the adducts 3b‐f .     

Two New N‐(O‐Carbamoylglucopyranosyl)‐N‐dimethylansamitocins from Actinosynnema pretiosum

Two new and a known N‐(O‐carbamoylglucopyranosyl)ansamitocins were isolated from Actinosynnema pretiosum ssp. auranticum ATCC 31565. The known N‐(4‐O‐carbamoyl‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)‐N‐demethylansamitocin P 2 (=ACGP‐2; 1 ) was assigned according to 1D‐ and 2D‐NMR data, and the two new compounds were identified as N‐(6‐O‐carbamoyl‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)‐N‐demethylansamitocin P 2 (=ACGP‐2′; 2 ) and N‐(4‐O‐carbamoyl‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)‐N‐demethylansamitocin P 1 (=ACGP‐1; 3 ) on the basis of spectroscopic data interpretation including 2D‐NMR and tandem MS analysis.     

Lithiation of N‐protected‐dihydro‐1,4‐benzoxaziness

Lithiation of N‐protected‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,4‐benzoxazines is described. Lithiation of N‐(tert‐butoxycarbonyl)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,4‐benzoxazine ( 1 ) with BuLi/TMEDA occurred in the α‐position to nitrogen on the heterocyclic ring, leading to the unexpected ring‐opened product 3 . On the other hand, lithiation of N‐methyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,4‐benzoxazine ( 4 ) took place at the oxygen‐adjacent ortho‐position of the aromatic ring.     

N‐(3H‐Thia­zol‐2‐yl­idene)­nitr­amine and N‐methyl‐N‐(thia­zol‐2‐yl)­nitr­amine

The geometries of the thia­zole ring and the nitr­amino groups in N‐(3H‐thia­zol‐2‐yl­idene)­nitr­amine, C₃H₃N₃O₂S, (I), and N‐­methyl‐N‐(thia­zol‐2‐yl)­nitr­amine, C₄H₅N₃O₂S, (II), are very similar. The nitr­amine group in (II) is planar and twisted along the C—N bond with respect to the thia­zole ring. In both structures, the asymmetric unit includes two practically equal mol­ecules. In (I), the mol­ecules are arranged in layers connected to each other by N—H⋯N and much weaker C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In the crystal structure of (II), the mol­ecules are arranged in layers bound to each other by both weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and S⋯O dipolar interactions.