Ab initio calculations on the barrier height for the hydrogen addition to ethylene and formaldehyde. The importance of spin projection

Heats of reaction and barrier heights have been computed for H + CH₂CH₂ → C₂H₅, H + CH₂O → CH₃O, and H + CH₂O → CH₂OH using unrestricted Hartree-Fock and Møller–Plesset perturbation theory up to fourth order (with and without spin annihilation), using single-reference configuration interaction, and using multiconfiguration self-consistent field methods with 3-21G, 6-31G(d), 6-31G(d,p), and 6-311G(d,p) basis sets. The barrier height in all three reactions appears to be relatively insensitive to the basis sets, but the heats of reaction are affected by p-type polarization functions on hydrogen. Computation of the harmonic vibrational frequencies and infrared intensities with two sets of polarization functions on heavy atoms [6-31G(2d)] improves the agreement with experiment. The experimental barrier height for H + C₂H₄ (2.04 ± 0.08 kcal/mol) is overestimated by 7?9 kcal/mol at the MP2, MP3, and MP4 levels. MCSCF and CISD calculations lower the barrier height by approximately 4 kcal/mol relative to the MP4 calculations but are still almost 4 kcal/mol too high compared to experiment. Annihilation of the largest spin contaminant lowers the MP4SDTQ computed barrier height by 8?9 kcal/mol. For the hydrogen addition to formaldehyde, the same trends are observed. The overestimation of the barrier height with Møller-Plesset perdicted barrier heights for H + C₂H₄ → C₂H₅, H + CH₂O → CH₃O, and H + CH₂O → CH₂OH at the MP4SDTQ /6-31G(d) after spin annihilation are respectively 1.8, 4.6, and 10.5 kcal/mol.     

An ab initio molecular orbital study of the structures and energies of neutral and charged bimolecular complexes of NH3 with the hydrides AHn (A = N,O, F,P, S,and Cl)

Hartree-Fock 6-31G(d) structures for the neutral, positive ion, and negative ion bimolecular complexes of NH₃ with the first- and second-row hydrides AH_n (AH_n = NH₃, OH₂, FH, PH₃, SH₂, and ClH) have been determined. All of the stable neutral complexes except (NH₃)₂, the positive ion complexes with NH₃ as the proton acceptor, and the negative ion complexes containing first-row anions exhibit conventional hydrogen bonded structures with essentially linear hydrogen bonds and directed lone pairs of electrons. The positive ion complex NH₄⁺ …? OH₂ has the dipole moment vector of H₂O instead of a lone pair directed along the intermolecular line, while the complexes of NH₄⁺ with SH₂, FH, and ClH have structures intermediate between the lone-pair directed and dipole directed forms. The negative ion complexes containing second-row anions have nonlinear hydrogen bonds. The addition of diffuse functions on nonhydrogen atoms to the valence double-split plus polarization 6-31G(d,p) basis set usually decreases the computed stabilization energies of these complexes. Splitting d polarization functions usually destabilizes these complexes, whereas splitting p polarization functions either has no effect or leads to stabilization. The overall effect of augmenting the 6-31G(d,p) basis set with diffuse functions on nonhydrogen atoms and two sets of polarization functions is to lower computed stabilization energies. Electron correlation stabilizes all of these complexes. The second-order Møller–Plesset correlation term is the largest term and always has a stabilizing effect, whereas the third and fourth-order terms are smaller and often of opposite sign. The recommended level of theory for computing the stabilization energies of these complexes is MP2/6-31+G(2d,2p), although MP2/6-31+G(d,p) is appropriate for the negative ion complexes.     

Tautomerism of monochalcogenosilanoic acids CH3Si(O)XH (X = S,Se, Te) in the gas phase and in the polar and aprotic solution: An ab initio computational investigation

Computational investigations by an ab initio molecular orbital method (HF and MP2) with the 6‐311+G(d,p) and 6‐311++G(2df, 2pd) basis sets on the tautomerism of three monochalcogenosilanoic acids CH₃Si(?O)XH (X = S, Se, and Te) in the gas phase and a polar and aprotic solution tetrahydrofuran (THF) was undertaken. Calculated results show that the silanol forms CH₃Si(?X)OH are much more stable than the silanone forms CH₃Si(?O)XH in the gas‐phase, which is different from the monochalcogenocarboxylic acids, where the keto forms CH₃C(?O)XH are dominant. This situation may be attributed to the fact that the Si? O and O? H single bonds in the silanol forms are stronger than the Si? X and X? H single bonds in the silanone forms, respectively, even though the Si?X (X = S, Se, and Te) double bonds are much weaker than the Si?O double bond. These results indicate that the stability of the monochalcogenosilanoic acid tautomers is not determined by the double bond energies, contrary to the earlier explanation based on the incorrect assumption that the Si?S double bond is stronger than the S?O double bond for the tautomeric equilibrium of RSi(?O)SH (R?H, F, Cl, CH₃, OH, NH₂) to shift towards the thione forms [RSi(?S)OH]. The binding with CH₃OCH₃ enhances the preference of the silanol form in the tautomeric equilibrium, and meanwhile significantly lowers the tautomeric barriers by more than 34 kJ/mol in THF solution. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2008     

The 6-31G++ basis set: An economical basis set for correlated wavefunctions

The 6-31G ⁺⁺ basis set is described. This basis set is very similar to the existing 6-31G ^** set but is somewhat smaller through the use of five (rather than six) second-order Gaussians (d functions) and has polarization function exponents optimized for correlated rather than Hartree–Fock wavefunctions. The performance of 6-31G ⁺⁺ is compared with that of the 6-31G ^** and 6-31G ^** basis sets through calculation of the geometries and atomization energies for the set of molecules LiH, FH, H₂O, NH₃, CH₄, N₂, CO, HCN, and HCCH.     

Correlated one‐electron wave functions

Using four basis sets, 6‐311G(d,p), 6‐31+G(d,p), 6‐311++G(2d,2p), and 6‐311++G(3df,3pd), the optimized structures with all real frequencies were obtained at the MP2 level for dimers CH₂O? HF, CH₂O? H₂O, CH₂O? NH₃, and CH₂O? CH₄. The structures of CH₂O? HF, CH₂O? H₂O, and CH₂O? NH₃ are cycle‐shaped, which result from the larger bend of σ‐type hydrogen bonds. The bend of σ‐type H‐bond O…H? Y (Y?F, O, N) is illustrated and interpreted by an attractive interaction of a chemically intuitive π‐type hydrogen bond. The π‐type hydrogen bond is the interaction between one of the acidic H atoms of CH₂O and lone pair(s) on the F atom in HF, the O atom in H₂O, or the N atom in NH₃. By contrast with above the three dimers, for CH₂O? CH₄, because there is not a π‐type hydrogen‐bond to bend its linear hydrogen bond, the structure of CH₂O? CH₄ is a noncyclic shaped. The interaction energy of hydrogen bonds and the π‐type H‐bond are calculated and discussed at the CCSD(T)/6‐311++G(3df,3pd) level. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005     

On the additivity of basis set effects in some simple fluorine containing systems

The reactions F + H₂ → HF + H, HF → H + F, F → F⁺ + e^? and F + e^? → F^? were used as simple test cases to assess the additivity of basis set effects on reaction energetics computed at the MP4 level. The 6-31G and 6-311G basis sets were augmented with 1, 2, and 3 sets of polarization functions, higher angular momentum polarization functions, and diffuse functions (27 basis sets from 6-31Gd, p) to 6-31 ++ G(3df, 3pd) and likewise for the 6-311G series). For both series substantial nonadditivity was found between diffuse functions on the heavy atom and multiple polarization functions (e.g., 6-31 + G(3d, 3p) vs. 6-31 + G(d, p) and 6-31G(3d, 3p)). For the 6-311G series there is an extra nonadditivity between d functions on hydrogen and multiple polarization functions. Provided that these interactions are taken into account, the remaining basis set effects are additive to within ±0.5 kcal/mol for the reactions considered. Large basis set MP4 calculations can also be estimated to within ±0.5 kcal/mol using MP2 calculations, est. E_MP4(6-31 ++ G(3df, 3pd)) ≈ E_MP4(6-31G(d, p)) + E_MP2(6-31 ++ G(3df, 3pd)) – E_MP2(6-31G(d, p)) or E_MP4(6-31 + G(d, p) + E_MP2(6-31 ++ G(3df, 3pd)) – E_MP2(6-31 + G(d, p)) and likewise for the 6-311G series.     

Pair-excitation MCSCF treatment of small molecules in an optimized Slater–Transform–Preuss basis set

Pair-excitation multiconfigurational self-consistent field (PEMCSCF ) treatment of 11 small molecules (LiH, BeH₂, BH₃, BF, CH₄, C₂H₄, C₂H₂, CH₂O, NH₃, H₂O, and HF) has been carried out in a minimum basis set of Slater Transform Preuss functions as fitted by six cartesian gaussians (STP -6G). The advantages of accuracy without using a split basis are shown by comparison to familiar 4-31G and 6-31G calculations using molecular geometries optimized with STO -6G basis sets. A benefit is shown for the use of minimum basis fitted to STP functions: they overemphasize long-tail radial dependence to achieve long range basis sensitivity without increasing the basis size at the AO -to-MO transformation step in the configuration interaction portion of the MCSCF algorithm. Fully optimized STP -6G parameters are given and appear to be transferable as shown for acrolein. A FORTRAN listing of the full least squares fitting algorithm is available* for in situ generation of STP -6G orbitals energetically superior to 4-31G, or a less accurate STP -6G 1S, 2S, and 2P basis may be scaled directly as if they were STO -6G functions, but with considerably lower energy that with an STO -6G basis.     

Long‐range π‐type hydrogen bond in dimers CH2?HF,CH2O?H2O,and CH2O?NH3

Using four basis bets, (6‐311G(d,p), 6‐31+G(d,p), 6‐31++G(2d,2p), and 6‐311++G(3df,3pd), the optimized structures with all real frequencies were obtained at the MP2 level for the dimers CH₂O? HF, CH₂O? H₂O, CH₂O? NH₃, and CH₂O? CH₄. The structures of CH₂O? HF, CH₂O? H₂O, and CH₂O? NH₃ are cycle‐shaped, which result from the larger bend of σ‐type hydrogen bonds. The bend of σ‐type H‐bond O…H? Y (Y?F, O, N) is illustrated and interpreted by an attractive interaction of a chemically intuitive π‐type hydrogen bond. The π‐type hydrogen bond is the interaction between one of the H atoms of CH₂O and lone pair(s) on the F atom in HF, the O atom in H₂O, or the N atom in NH₃. In contrast with the above three dimers, for CH₂O? CH₄, because there is not a π‐type hydrogen bond to bend its linear hydrogen bond, the structure of CH₂O? CH₄ is noncyclic shaped. The interaction energy of hydrogen bonds and the π‐type H‐bond are calculated and discussed at the CCSD (T)/6‐311++G(3df,3pd) level. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005     

Degenerate lithium-hydrogen exchange reactions: Ab initio models for metallation mechanisms involving H2, CH4, NH3, H2O,and HF

Hydrogen exchange reactions between lithium and sodium compounds, MX (M=Li: X=H, CH₃, NH₂, OH, F; M=Na: X=CH₃), and the corresponding hydrides, HX, have been modelled by means of ab initio calculations including electron correlation and zero point energy (ZPE) corrections. Small or no activation barriers (from the initial complexes) are encountered in systems involving lone pairs (10.8, 2.4, 0.0 kcal/mol for X=NH₂, OH, F, respectively). Since the association energies of the initial complexes are much larger (21.0, 20.4, 23.5 kcal/mol, respectively; MP2/6–31+G*/6–31+G* + ZPE), such exchange reactions should occur spontaneously in the gas phase. The methyl systems (X=CH₃) have the largest barriers: 26.7 (M=Li) and 31.7 (M=Na) kcal/mol (MP2/6–31+G*/6–31G* + ZPE), and the initial complexes are only weakly bound. The significance of these systems as models for hydrogen exchange reactions in complexes of electropositive transition metals is discussed. However, the gegenion-free exchange of hydrogen between CH₃ and CH₄ has a much lower, 11.8 kcal/mol barrier (MP2/6–31+G*/6–31+G* + ZPE). All the transition structures are highly ionic (charges on the metals > +0.8). The effect of aggregation has been considered by examining the hydrogen exchange between (LiX)₂ and HX(X=H, CH₃, NH₂, OH). Although these dimer reactions formally involve six, instead of four electrons, no “aromatic” preference is observed.     

Non-convertional hydrogen bonding interaction of BH3NH3 complexes: a comparative theoretical study

A new type of hydrogen bond, called a dihydrogen bond, has recently been introduced. In this bond hydrogen is donated to (hydridic) hydrogen. In this paper, ab initio HF, MP2 and DFT(B3LYP) levels of theory with different basis sets in combination with counterpoise procedure for basis set superposition error correction have been applied to BH₃NH₃ dimer and BH₃NH₃ complexes of methane, hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, water, methanol and hydrogen fluoride to understand the features of dihydrogen bond. The optimized geometric parameters and interaction energies for various isomers at different levels are estimated. The structures obtained at different computational levels are in agreement with each other. Dihydrogen bond does not occur in both BH₃NH₃⋯CH₄ and BH₃NH₃⋯NH₃ complexes. Apart from the B–H⋯H–N dihydrogen bond found in the BH₃NH₃ crystal and dimmer, the B–H⋯H–X (XC, O, F) dihydrogen bonds have been observed in the BH₃NH₃⋯HCN, BH₃NH₃⋯H₂O, BH₃NH₃⋯CH₃OH and BH₃NH₃⋯HF complexes, while the classic H bonds also exist in the last three complexes. As for the complexes in which only dihydrogen bonds appear the strength of dihydrogen bonds ranges from 17.9 to 18.9 kJ mol⁻¹ at B3LYP/6-311++g(d,p) level. Binding energies obtained from the MP2 and B3LYP optimized structures are more sensitive to basis sets than those from the HF method. Larger basis functions generally tend to produce slightly longer intermolecular distances, and the B3LYP and MP2 methods generate shorter intermolecular distances though they usually produce longer bond lengths compared with those at the HF level. The infrared spectrum frequencies, IR intensities and the vibrational frequency shifts are reported. Finally the solution phase studies on BH₃NH₃⋯HF complex are also carried out using the Onsager reaction field model with a range of dielectric constants from 2 to 80 at B3LYP/6-311++g(d,p) level.     

Geometry,basis set,and correlation energy dependence of computed protonation energies of imino bases

The nitrogen protonation energies of the imino bases HN?CHR, where R is H, CH₃, NH₂, OH, and F, have been evaluated to determine the dependence of absolute and relative protonation energies on geometry, basis set, and correlation effects. Reliable absolute protonation energies require a basis set larger than a split-valence plus polarization basis, the inclusion of correlation, and optimized geometries of at least Hartree–Fock 4-31G quality. Consistent relative protonation energies can be obtained at the Hartree–Fock level with smaller basis sets. Extending the split-valence basis set by the addition of polarization functions on all atoms decreases the computed absolute Hartree–Fock nitrogen protonation energies of the imino bases HN?CHR except when R is F, but increases the oxygen protonation energies of the carbonyl bases O?CHR.     

Searching blue-shifted O–H···Y hydrogen bond in CH<Subscript>3</Subscript>OH complexes with CF<Subscript>4</Subscript>, C<Subscript>2</Subscript>F<Subscript>2</Subscript>, OC,Ne, and He: a theoretical study

The hydrogen-bonded structures of the CH₃OH complexes with CF₄, C₂F₂, OC, Ne, and He are designated as the starting points for geometry optimizations without and with counterpoise (CP) correction at MP2 level of theory with the basis sets 6-31+G*, 6-31++G**, and 6-311++G**, respectively. Tight convergence criteria are applied throughout all geometry optimizations in order to reduce the computational errors. According to the optimizations without CP correction, a blue-shifted O–H···Y (where Y = F, O, Ne, or He) hydrogen bond exists in all these five complexes. The magnitudes of blue shifts of ν(O–H) of the former four complexes with respect to that of CH₃OH are reduced greatly when the polarization and diffuse functions of the hydrogen atoms are added (results from 6-31+G* versus those from 6-31++G**). However, for the complexes CH₃OH–CF₄ and CH₃OH–C₂F₂, our optimizations using the CP corrections did not find the hydrogen-bonded structure to be a stationary point. The energy minimum of both the complexes corresponds to a non-hydrogen-bonded structure.     

Basis set and correlation effects on computed lithium ion affinities of some oxygen and nitrogen bases

Basis set expansion and correlation effects on computed lithium cation affinities have been evaluated for the oxygen and nitrogen bases CH₃OH, H₂CO, CO, CH₃NH₂, CH₂NH, and HCN. The presence of diffuse functions on nonhydrogen atoms is found to be the most important single enhancement of double- and triple-split valence plus polarization basis sets. With the triple-split basis, enhancement effects are nearly additive. Correlation usually decreases computed lithium ion affinities, with the second order Møller-Plesset correlation term being the dominant term.     

An ab initio molecular orbital study of the deprotonation of amines

The geometries of the amines NH₂X and amido anions NHX^?, where X = H, CH₃, NH₂, OH, F, C₂H, CHO, and CN have been optimized using ab initio molecular orbital calculations with a 4-31G basis set. The profiles to rotation about the N? X bonds in CH₃NH^?, NH₂NH^?, and HONH^? are very similar to those for the isoprotic and isoelectronic neutral compounds CH₃OH, NH₂OH, and HOOH. The amines with unsaturated bonds adjacent to the nitrogen atoms undergo considerable skeletal rearrangement on deprotonation such that most of the negative charge of the anion is on the substituent. The computed order of acidity for the amines NH₂X is X = CN > HCO > F ≈ C₂H > OH > NH₂ > CH₃ > H and for the reaction NHX^? + H⁺ → NH₂X the computed energies vary over the range 373–438 kcal/mol.     

Minimal basis sets in calculations of intermolecular interaction energies

Several minimal (7, 3/3) Gaussian basis sets have been used to calculate the energies and some other properties of CH₄ and H₂O. Improved basis sets developed for these molecules have been extended to NH₃ and HF and employed to H₂CO and CH₃OH. Interaction energies between XH_n molecules have been calculated using the old and the new minimal basis sets. The results obtained with the new basis sets are comparable in accuracy to those calculated with significantly more extended basis sets involving polarization functions. Binding energies calculated using the counterpoise method are not much different for the new and the old minimal basis sets, and are likely to be more accurate than the results of much more extended calculations.     

Nonempirical calculations of dipole moments of molecules in semifloating gaussian basis sets

For the example of the calculation of the dipole moments of the HF, HCl, H₂O, NH₃, CO, H₂CO, CH₃F molecules in two-exponent and three-exponent Gaussian basis sets, we have studied the effect of including floating functions in the basis, directly giving the effect of polarization of the electron shell of the atom in the molecule. We have established a weak dependence of the calculated dipole moment on the dimensionality of the basis, the number of floating functions, and also the orbital exponents of the hydrogen atoms. The correction introduced by the floating functions in molecules with polar bonds is considerably greater than the correlation correction. The proposed approach allows us to decrease the dimensionality of the orbital basis by a factor of 1.5–2 without making the agreement with experiment worse.Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Éksperimental'naya Khimiya, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 481–485, July–August, 1990.     

K-shell ionization energies in molecules by SCF GF calculations

Energies of CH₄, NH₃, H₂O and C₂H₄ K-ionized molecules are calculated by means of a Group Function method using minimal or near minimal basis sets of STO's. Further results from very large basis sets are reported for CH₄, NH₃, and H₂O. Results seemingly do not suffer the shortcomings of a previous SCF MO treatment.     

Ab initio study of hydrogen bonding in the phenol–water system

Three hydrogen-bonded minima on the phenol-water, C₆H₅OH—H₂O, potential energy surface were located with 3–21G and 6–31G** basis sets at both Hartree–Fock and MP2 levels of theory. MP2 binding energies were computed using large “correlation consistent” basis sets that included extra diffuse functions on all atoms. An estimate of the effect of expanding the basis set to the triple-zeta level (multiple f functions on carbon and oxygen and multiple d functions on hydrogen) was derived from calculations on a related prototype system. The best estimates of the electronic binding energies for the three minima are –7.8, –5.0, and –2.0 kcal/mol. The consequences of uncertainties in the geometries and limitations in the level of correlation recovery are analyzed. It is suggested that our best estimates will likely underestimate the complete basis set, full CI values by 0.1–0.3 kcal/mol. Vibrational normal modes were determined for all three minima, including an MP2/6–31G** analysis for the most strongly bound complex. Computational strategies for larger phenol–water complexes are discussed. © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Crystal and molecular structure of 1,1-quasigermatranediol-1,1-dihydroxy-2,8-dioxa-5-azagermocane

By X-ray diffraction the crystal and molecular structure of quasigermatranediol (HO)₂Ge(OCH₂CH₂)₂NH at 155 K is determined. By quantum chemical method using second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) and a split-valence 6-311++G(d,p) basis set with polarization and diffuse functions for all types of atoms, the structural parameters of this molecule are calculated. In the crystal, the quasigermatranediol molecules are arranged in columns due to O-H...O and N-H...O hydrogen bonds of medium strength. The columns are linked together via weak O-H...O and N-H...O hydrogen bonds. By calorimetry, the phase transition in a crystal of quasigermatranediol at 150–145 K is revealed.     

NLO‐X (X = I–III): New Gaussian basis sets for prediction of linear and nonlinear electric properties

New adjusted Gaussian basis sets are proposed for first and second rows elements (H, B, C, N, O, F, Si, P, S, and Cl) with the purpose of calculating linear and mainly nonlinear optical (L–NLO) properties for molecules. These basis sets are new generation of Thakkar‐DZ basis sets, which were recontracted and augmented with diffuse and polarization extrabasis functions. Atomic energy and polarizability were used as reference data for fitting the basis sets, which were further applied for prediction of L–NLO properties of diatomic, H₂, N₂, F₂, Cl₂, BH, BF, BCl, HF, HCl, CO, CS, SiO, PN, and polyatomic, CH₄, SiH₄, H₂O, H₂S, NH₃, PH₃, OCS, NNO, and HCN molecules. The results are satisfactory for all electric properties tested; dipole moment (µ), polarizability (α), and first hyperpolarizability (β), with an affordable computational cost. Three new basis sets are presented and called as NLO‐I (ADZP), NLO‐II (DZP), and NLO‐III (VDZP). The NLO‐III is the best choice to predict L–NLO properties of large molecular systems, because it presents a balance between computational cost and accuracy. The average errors for β at B3LYP/NLO‐III level were of 8% for diatomic molecules and 14% for polyatomic molecules that are within the experimental uncertainty. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.