Ion pair formation in water. association constants of bolaform, bisquaternary ammonium, electrolytes by chemical trapping

The first and second association constants, K1 and K2, for ion pair formation in aqueous 0.02-3.5 M solutions of bis(trimethyl)-alpha,omega-alkanediammonium halides with variable spacer lengths, 1-n-1 2X (n = 2-4, X = Cl, Br) and bolaform salts and for tetramethylammonium halides (TMAX, X = Cl, Br), K(TMAX), were determined by the chemical trapping method. Values for K(TMAX) are small, K(TMABr) = 0.83 M(-1) and K(TMACl) = 0.29 M(-1), in agreement with literature values. For the bolaform salts, K1 depends on spacer length and counterion type, ranges from 0.4 to 17 M(-1), is 2-10 times larger than K2, is larger for Br- than Cl-, and decreases by a factor of approximately 3 for Cl- and approximately 10 for Br- as n increases from 2 to 4. K2, for the formation of bolaform dihalide pair, is essentially the same as that for ion pair formation in TMAX solutions, i.e., K2 approximately K(TMAX). Values of K1 and K(TMABr) obtained from changes in 79Br line widths are in good agreement with those obtained by chemical trapping. The results are consistent with a thermodynamic model in which the ion association depends on the balance of the ion specific hydration free energies of cations and anions and their ion specific and hydration interactions in ion pairs. Spacer length dependent ion pairing by bolaform electrolytes, which are analogues of the headgroups and counterions of gemini amphiphiles, suggests a new model for the spacer length dependent sphere-to-rod transitions of gemini micelles. Neutral, but polar, headgroup-counterion pairs have a lower demand for hydration that free headgroups and counterions, and headgroup-counterion pair formation releases interfacial water into the bulk aqueous phase, permitting tighter amphiphile packing in rodlike micelles.     

The structure of the homogeneous oxidation catalyst, Mn(II)(Br(-1))x, in supercritical water: an X-ray absorption fine-structure study

Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) and X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopies were used to probe the first-shell coordination structure about Mn(II) and Br(-1) ions that exist as contact ion pairs in supercritical water. This work was performed to clarify why solutions of MnBr2 in supercritical water are known to effectively catalyze the aerobic oxidative synthesis of terephthalic acid from p-xylene as well as a number of other methylaromatic compounds. The Mn and Br K-edge spectra were collected at the bending magnet beamline (sector 20) at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. The first-shell coordination structure about the Mn(II) ion changes from octahedral at ambient conditions to tetrahedral at supercritical conditions. Under supercritical conditions, the measured bond distances of Mn-OH2 and Mn-Br are 2.14 and 2.46 A, respectively. Direct contact ion pairs form with about 2 Br(-1) ions present in the first coordination shell of the Mn(II) ion. The structure of dissolved MnBr2, below 1.0 m, changes from essentially [Mn(II)(H2O)6]+2 to [Mn(II)(H2O)2(Br(-1))2] in supercritical water (scH2O). When an excess of Br(-1) ion is added, the bromide coordination number increases and the number of water molecules decreases. The results show that the initial MnBr2 catalyst in scH2O is tetrahedral with two Mn-Br contact ion pairs. The presence of the acetate anion deactivates the catalyst by formation of insoluble MnO.     

Micellization of dissymmetric cationic gemini surfactants and their interaction with dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine vesicles

The micellization process of a series of dissymmetric cationic gemini surfactants [CmH2m+1(CH3)2N(CH2)6N(CH3)2C6H13]Br2 (designated as m-6-6 with m = 12, 14, and 16) and their interaction with dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) vesicles have been investigated. In the micellization process of these gemini surfactants themselves, critical micelle concentration (cmc), micelle ionization degree, and enthalpies of micellization (DeltaHmic) were determined, from which Gibbs free energies of micellization (DeltaGmic) and entropy of micellization (DeltaSmic) were derived. These properties were found to be influenced significantly by the dissymmetry in the surfactant structures. The phase diagrams for the solubilization of DMPC vesicles by the gemini surfactants were constructed from calorimetric results combining with the results of turbidity and dynamic light scattering. The effective surfactant to lipid ratios in the mixed aggregates at saturation (Resat) and solubilization (Resol) were derived. For the solubilization of DMPC vesicles, symmetric 12-6-12 is more effective than corresponding single-chain surfactant DTAB, whereas the dissymmetric m-6-6 series are more effective than symmetric 12-6-12, and 16-6-6 is the most effective. The chain length mismatch between DMPC and the gemini surfactants may be responsible for the different Re values. The transfer enthalpy per mole of surfactant within the coexistence range may be associated with the total hydrophobicity of the alkyl chains of gemini surfactants. The transfer enthalpies of surfactant from micelles to bilayers are always endothermic due to the dehydration of headgroups and the disordering of lipid acyl chain packing during the vesicle solubilization.     

Micellization of cationic gemini surfactant and its interaction with DNA in dilute brine

The micellization of cationic gemini surfactant trimethylene-1,3-bis (dodecyldimethylammonium bromide) (12-3-12·2Br) was investigated and critical micelle concentrations (CMC) and thermodynamic parameters were evaluated as functions of ionic strength and temperature. The micellization of 12-3-12·2Br is entropically driven and thermodynamically favored. Raising the temperature slightly increases the CMC, while increasing the ionic strength lowers the CMC. A multi-technique study of the 12-3-12·2Br/DNA interaction and its dependence on ionic strength, temperature and DNA concentration were presented. DNA with loose coil conformation, necklace-like structure, highly ordered toroidal aggregates and coexisting of large aggregates and small structures in DNA/12-3-12·2Br system were observed. Critical aggregation concentrations (CAC), interaction saturation concentrations (C(2)), and associated thermodynamic parameters were determined. The screening effect of salt decreases the DNA/12-3-12·2Br electrostatic attraction, but favors the formation of free 12-3-12·2Br micelles or aggregates on the DNA chain. DNA acts as a separate phase contacting with the surfactant molecules and therefore CAC is independent of DNA concentration. Increasing DNA concentration postpones the appearance of free micelle in bulk phase, consequently increases the C(2). Finally an interaction mechanism between 12-3-12·2Br and DNA was proposed.     

Gemini阳离子表面活性剂在水溶液中胶团化行为的温度效 应与焓、熵补偿

测定了Cemini阳离子表面活性剂C~m-----s-----C~m·2Br(m=8,10,12,;s=2,6及m=12;s=3,4)水溶液的电导,从电导(k)～表面活性剂浓度(c)曲线的转折点可求得临界胶团浓度cmc.实验发现,Gemini阳离子表面活性剂的胶团化倾向明显强于其“单体分子”)即单离子头基单烷烃链表面活性剂)。根据质量作用模型计算了胶经过程的吉布氏能、焓和熵的改变。结果表明Gemini表面活性剂聚集机理和其对应的“单体分子”类似,主要来自熵驱动。所有的焓/熵补偿图均呈现良好的线性关系,补偿直线在γ轴的截距随s减小而变小,这意味着具有较小s的Gemini表面活性剂倾向于生成稳定的胶团。     

Aggregation behavior of a series of anionic sulfonate gemini surfactants and their corresponding monomeric surfactant

A series of anionic sulfonate gemini surfactants with the general structure of [(Cn H2n+1)(C3H6SO(-)3) NCsN(C3H6SO(-)3)(CnH2n+1)].2Na+ have been synthesized. While the spacer group Cs represents p-xylyl or (CH2)3, the surfactants are abbreviated as CnCpxCn(SO3)2 (n=8,10,12) or C12C3C12(SO3)2(n=12), respectively. A corresponding monomeric surfactant C12H25N(CH3)(C3H6SO(-)3).Na+(C12NSO3) has also been prepared. The aggregation behavior of these surfactants has been studied at pH 9.2 and ionic strength of 30 mM. The gemini surfactants exhibit stronger aggregation tendencies and much less endothermic enthalpy changes of micellization (DeltaH mic) compared with the monomeric surfactant. The critical micelle concentrations (CMC) of the gemini surfactants decrease with the increase of the hydrophobic chain length from C8CpxC8(SO3)2 to C10CpxC10(SO3)2, but the CMC values of C10CpxC10(SO3)2 and C12CpxC12(SO3)2 are very close. The DeltaH mic values vary from endothermic for C8CpxC8(SO3)2 to almost zero for C12CpxC12(SO3)2. Besides, vesicles are observed above the CMC for all these surfactants. The water-mediated intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the tertiary nitrogen groups may assist C12NSO3 and C12C3C12(SO3)2 in their vesicle formation, while the pi-pi interaction between aromatic rings should be another additional driving force for the vesicle formation of CnCpxCn(SO3)2. Meanwhile, the hydrogen bonding, pi-pi interaction, and strong hydrophobic interaction provide the possibility of a multilayer formation for C12CpxC12(SO3)2 and C12C3C12(SO3)2 at the air/water interface, which is a possible reason for the extremely small minimum area occupied per surfactant molecule at the air/water interface for these two gemini surfactants.     

The Adsorption of Gemini and Conventional Surfactants onto Some Soil Solids and the Removal of 2-Naphthol by the Soil Surfaces

The adsorption of two cationic gemini surfactants, [C(n)H(2n+1) N(+)(CH(3))(2)-CH(2)CH(2)](2).2Br(-), where n=12 and 14, on limestone, sand, and clay (Na-montmorillonite) from their aqueous solution in double-distilled water and the effect of this adsorption on the removal of 2-naphthol have been studied. Compared to those of conventional cationic surfactants with similar single hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups (C(n)H(2n+1)N(+)(CH(3))(3).Br(-), where n=12 and 14), the molar adsorptions of the gemini and the conventional surfactants on Na-montmorillonite are almost identical and very close to their cation exchange capacities. On sand and limestone, the molar adsorption of the cationic gemini surfactants is much larger than that of their corresponding conventional surfactants. Adsorption studies of the pollutants onto the three kinds of solids treated by either the gemini or the conventional surfactants show that the former are both more efficient and more effective at removing 2-naphthol from the aqueous phase. On all three soil solids, the addition of KBr increases the efficiency of the adsorption of both types of cationics and for most cases increases also the maximum amount adsorbed, but decreases slightly the efficiency of removal of 2-naphthol. On limestone, the anionic gemini adsorbs with one hydrophilic group oriented toward the Ca(2+) sites on the surface and its second hydrophilic group oriented toward the aqueous phase. The conventional anionic surfactant forms a double layer. The gemini anionic is more efficient and more effective than the conventional anionic in the removal of 2-naphathol from the aqueous phase. Both anionic conventional and gemini surfactants have no adsorption on sand. The adsorption mechanisms for all the surfactants on the three soil solid surfaces are discussed. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.     

Polymerizable cationic gemini surfactant

A polymerizable cationic gemini surfactant, [CH(2)=C(CH(3))COO(CH(2))(11)N(+)CH(3))(2)CH(2)](2).2Br(-), 1 has been synthesized and its basic interfacial properties were investigated (in water and in the presence of 0.05 M NaBr). For comparison, the properties of monomeric surfactant corresponding to 1, CH(2)=C(CH(3))COO(CH(2))(11)N(+)(CH(3))(3).Br(-), 2, were also investigated. Parameters studied include cmc (critical micelle concentration), C(20) (required to reduce the surface tension of the solvent by 20 mN/m), gamma(cmc) (the surface tension at the cmc), Gamma(cmc) (the maximum surface excess concentration at the air/water interface), A(min) (the minimum area per surfactant molecule at the air/water interface), and cmc/C(20) ratio (a measure of the tendency to form micelles relative to adsorb at the air/water interface). For the polymerizable gemini surfactant, 1, the methacryloxy groups at the terminal of each hydrophobic group in a molecule have no contact with the air/water interface in the monolayer, whereas for the corresponding monomeric surfactant, 2, the methacryloxy group contacts at the interface forming a looped configuration like a bolaamphiphile. Polymerized micelles of the gemini surfactant are fairly small monodisperse and spherical particles with a mean diameter of 3 nm.     

Decondensation of cationic gemini surfactant-induced DNA aggregates using triblock copolymer (PEO)20–(PPO)70–(PEO)20

Decondensation of DNA molecules, previously compacted by cationic gemini surfactant 12-3-12?·?2Br, has been successfully achieved by introducing triblock copolymer (PEO)₂₀–(PPO)₇₀–(PEO)₂₀ (P123). P123 can interact with 12-3-12?·?2Br to form supramolecular assemblies through hydrophobic interactions, while not interacting with DNA. When introducing 12-3-12?·?2Br into P123/DNA system, the presence of P123 will inhibit the formation of DNA/12-3-12?·?2Br complexes due to the stronger interaction between P123 and 12-3-12?·?2Br. For previously formed DNA/12-3-12?·?2Br complexes, the addition of P123 can lead to the release of DNA from the complex, which should be attributed to the complexation of P123 with free 12-3-12?·?2Br surfactants in bulk phase followed by the breakup of the thermodynamic equilibrium between surfactant aggregates associated with DNA and free surfactants in bulk phase. CD experiments reveal that 12-3-12?·?2Br can change the conformation of DNA from typical B-form to ψ-phase by formation of DNA/12-3-12?·?2Br complexes. However, the release of the surfactant from the complex induced by P123 turns DNA conformation from ψ-phase back to B-form.     

Effect of hydrocarbon parts of the polar headgroup on surfactant aggregates in gemini and bola surfactant solutions

Cationic gemini surfactant homologues alkanediyl-alpha,omega-bis(dodecyldiethylammonium) bromide, [C12H25(CH3CH2)2N(CH2)SN(CH2CH3)2C12H25]Br2, where S = 4, 6, 8, 10, or 12, referred to as C12CSC12(Et), and cationic bolaamphiphiles BPHEAB (biphenyl-4,4'-bis(oxyhexamethylenetriethylammonium) bromide), PHEAB (phenyl-4,4'- bis(oxyhexamethylenetriethylammonium) bromide) were synthesized, and their aggregation behaviors in aqueous solution were studied and compared by means of dynamic light scattering, fluorescence entrapment, and transmission electron microscopy. Spherical vesicles were found in the aqueous solutions of these gemini and bola surfactants, which can be attributed to the increase of the hydrocarbon parts of the polar headgroup of the surfactants. In combination with the result of the other gemini with headgroup of propyl group, the increase of the hydrophobic parts of the surfactant polar headgroup will be beneficial to enhance the aggregation capability of the gemini and bola surfactants. Both of the vesicles formed in the gemini and bola systems showed good stabilities with time and temperature, but different stability with salt due to the different membrane conformations of surfactant molecules in the vesicles.     

H2 and Cl2 production in the radiolysis of calcium and magnesium chlorides and hydroxides

The production of H2 has been examined in the gamma-ray and 5 MeV He ion radiolysis of CaCl2.2H2O, CaCl2.6H2O, Ca(OH)2, MgCl2.2H2O, MgCl2.6H2O, and Mg(OH)2. The highest yield for the formation of H2 is observed in the gamma-radiolysis of MgCl2.2H2O (0.72 molecule/(100 eV), 75 nmol/J), but the yield decreases with dose due to the relative instability of the dihydrate. The H2 yields with the other compounds range from 0.04 to 0.2 molecule/(100 eV) (4.2-21 nmol/J), which is lower than that from pure water or 2 M chloride solutions. There appears to be no relationship between the results for H2 from waters of hydration with that from aqueous salt brines. No particular trend is observed in the radiation chemical yields of H2 with respect to the cation or the degree of hydration. The production of Cl2 is found only in the gamma-radiolysis of CaCl2 with a few weight percent of excess water. No Cl2 was found in the 5 MeV He ion radiolysis of identical systems. None of the other compounds examined here showed detectable amounts of Cl2 formation.     

Adsorption of Gemini and Conventional Cationic Surfactants onto Montmorillonite and the Removal of Some Pollutants by the Clay

The adsorption of a series of gemini surfactants, [C(n)H(2n+1)N(+) (CH(3))(2)-CH(2)CH(2)](2).2Br(-), where n = 10, 12, 14, and 16, on clay (Na-montmorillonite) from their aqueous solution in 0.01 M KBr and the effect of this adsorption on the removal of 2-naphthol and 4-chlorophenol have been studied. Compared to those of conventional cationic surfactants with similar single hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups (C(n)H(2n+1)N(+)(CH(3))(3).Br(-), where n = 10, 12, 14, and 16), the molar adsorptions of the gemini and conventional surfactants are almost identical. This indicates that only one of the hydrophilic groups in the gemini molecule is adsorbed onto the clay and that the second hydrophilic is presumably oriented toward the aqueous phase, in contrast to the adsorption of the conventional surfactants, where the hydrophobic group is oriented toward the aqueous phase. Stability studies on dispersions of clay treated with the two types of surfactants confirm this. The slight increase in the moles of surfactant to values above the CEC of the clay with an increase in the carbon number of the hydrophobic chain indicates that adsorption through hydrophobic group interaction occurs in addition to the major ion exchange. Adsorption studies of the pollutants onto the clay treated by either the gemini or the conventional surfactants show that the former are both more efficient and more effective at removing the pollutants from the aqueous phase. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.     

Alzheimer amyloid beta(1-40) peptide: interactions with cationic gemini and single-chain surfactants

The aggregation of amyloid beta-peptide [Abeta(1-40)] into fibril is a key pathological process associated with Alzheimer's disease. The effect of cationic gemini surfactant hexamethylene-1,6-bis-(dodecyldimethylammonium bromide) [C(12)H(25)(CH(3))(2)N(CH(2))(6)N(CH(3))(2)C(12)H(25)]Br(2) (designated as C(12)C(6)C(12)Br(2)) and single-chain cationic surfactant dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) on the Alzheimer amyloid beta-peptide Abeta(1-40) aggregation behavior was studied by microcalorimetry, circular dichroism (CD), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements at pH 7.4. Without addition of surfactant, 0.5 g/L Abeta(1-40) mainly exists in dimeric state. It is found that the addition of the monomers of C(12)C(6)C(12)Br(2) and DTAB may cause the rapid aggregation of Abeta(1-40) and the fibrillar structures are observed by CD spectra and the AFM images. Due to the repulsive interaction among the head groups of surfactants and the formation of a small hydrophobic cluster of surfactant molecules, the fibrillar structure is disrupted again as the surfactant monomer concentration is increased, whereas globular species are observed in the presence of micellar solution. Different from single-chain surfactant, C(12)C(6)C(12)Br(2) has a much stronger interaction with Abeta(1-40) to generate larger endothermic energy at much lower surfactant concentration and has much stronger ability to induce the aggregation of Abeta(1-40).     

有机反离子对C12-s-C12·2Br水溶液表面活性的影响

溶液中添加的苯磺酸钠(SNzS)和萘磺酸钠(SNphS)与C12-s-C12·2Br产生强烈结合, 增大了Gemini表面活性剂分子的疏水性, 明显促进其在气/液界面的吸附和在溶液中的聚集. 这使得体系降低水表面张力的效率和能力大大提高, 并且在表面活性剂浓度很低时就生成了小聚集体. 因而, 此时表面张力法测得的cmc仅具有表观上的意义, 只反映了表面活性剂在气/液界面达到饱和吸附时的临界浓度. SNphS的疏水性强于SNzS, 更有效地促进了C12-s-C12·2Br的吸附和聚集.     

Interfacial composition and structural parameters of water/C12-s-C12 x 2Br/n-hexanol/n-heptane microemulsions studied by the dilution method

The interfacial composition of the stable water/C12-s-C12 x 2Br/n-hexanol/n-heptane microemulsions has been studied in detail by dilution method. The results showed a marked maximum amount of the n-hexanol populating on the surfaces of droplets (represented as a = n(a)i/n(s), where n(a)i and n(s) are respectively the moles of n-hexanol and gemini surfactant on the surface of droplets) with increasing water content. At a constant level of water addition (the molar ratio of water to surfactant W0 = 20), a decreased with increasing the spacer length in the C12-s-C12 x 2Br molecule. The structural parameters of a w/o microemulsion were also estimated by analyzing the data of dilution experiments, and we found that the radius of the water pool was very sensitive to the increment of water content. The radius of the water pool varied from 0.74 to 5.35 nm with increasing W0 from 10 to 50. The variation extent reached 4.61 nm. In the cases of water/CPC/n-butanol/isopropyl myristate and water/CTAB/n-butanol/isopropyl myristate, however, the corresponding variation extents were only 1.22 and 1.68 nm, respectively, when increasing comparable water content. The ratio of N(a)/N(2C), where N(a) and N(2C) are respectively the average numbers of n-hexanol and the total average numbers of alkyl chains of gemini surfactant populating on per droplet surface, decreased obviously with increasing water content at W0 > 15. This indicated that C12-2-C12 x 2Br favored to form large droplets that were suitable to solubilize more water.     

Interactions of cationic gemini surfactants with hydrophobically modified poly(acrylamides) studied by fluorescence and microcalorimetry

Steady-state fluorescence, time-resolved fluorescence quenching, and isothermal titration microcalorimetry have been used to study the interactions of cationic gemini surfactants alkanediyl-alpha,omega-bis(dodecyldimethylammonium bromide) (C(12)C(S)C(12)Br(2), S = 3, 6, and 12) with hydrophobically modified poly(acrylamide) (HMPAM) and unmodified poly(acrylamide) (PAM). Without addition of gemini surfactant, 0.2 wt % HMPAMs except PAM have already self-aggregated into hydrophobic aggregates. Different from single-chain surfactants, C(12)C(S)C(12)Br(2) have stronger interactions with HMPAMs to form surfactant/polymer aggregates, even with PAM. Addition of C(12)C(S)C(12)Br(2) may cause the disruption of HMPAM hydrophobic aggregates and the formation of mixed micelles. It is found that HMPAMs generate lower micropolarity of mixed micelles, larger values of enthalpy of interaction (DeltaH(ps)), and nearly constant values of Gibbs free energy of interaction (DeltaG(ps)). On the other hand, C(12)C(S)C(12)Br(2) with longer spacer brings out slightly lower micropolarity of mixed micelles, owing to the lower electrostatic repulsion between surfactant headgroups. Especially for C(12)C(12)C(12)Br(2), the values of DeltaH(ps) are much more endothermic and the values of DeltaG(ps) are much less negative. The weaker interactions of C(12)C(12)C(12)Br(2) with HMPAMs arise from the marked reduction of attraction between surfactant headgroups and polymer hydrophilic groups induced by its longer spacer.     

Local order in aqueous NaCl solutions and pure water: X-ray scattering and molecular dynamics simulations study

The microstructures of pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions over a wide range of salt concentrations (0-4 m) under ambient conditions are characterized by X-ray scattering and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. MD simulations are performed with the rigid SPC water model as a solvent, while the ions are treated as charged Lennard-Jones particles. Simulated data show that the first peaks in the O...O and O...H pair correlation functions clearly decrease in height with increasing salt concentration. Simultaneously, the location of the second O...O peak, the signature of the so-called tetrahedral structure of water, gradually disappears. Consequently, the degree of hydrogen bonding in liquid water decreases when compared to pure fluid. MD results also show that the hydration number around the cation decreases as the salt concentration increases, which is most likely because some water molecules in the first hydration shell are occasionally substituted by chlorine. In addition, the fraction of contact ion pairs increases and that of solvent-separated ion pairs decreases. Experimental data are analyzed to deduce the structure factors and the pair correlation functions of each system. X-ray results clearly show a perturbation of the association structure of the solvent and highlight the appearance of new interactions between ions and water. A model of intermolecular arrangement via MD results is then proposed to describe the local order in each system, as deduced from X-ray scattering data.     

Microcalorimetric study on the interaction of dissymmetric gemini surfactants with DNA

The interaction of a series of dissymmetric gemini surfactants, [C(m)H(2m+1)(CH(3))(2)N(CH(2))(6)N(CH(3))(2)C(n)H(2n+1)]Br(2) (designated as C(m)C(6)C(n)Br(2), with constant m+n=24, and m=12, 14, 16, and 18) with DNA in 10 mM NaCl solution has been investigated by isothermal titration microcalorimetry (ITC). The curves for titration of the surfactants into DNA solution show noticeable differences from those into 10 mM NaCl solution without DNA. It is attributed to the interaction between DNA and surfactants. The critical aggregation concentration (CAC), the saturation concentration (C(2)), and the thermodynamic parameters for the aggregation and interaction processes were obtained from the calorimetric titration curves. The results show that the dissymmetry degree (m/n) has a marked effect on the interaction of the C(m)C(6)C(n)Br(2) surfactants with DNA. The CAC and C(2) tend to become smaller with increased m/n. The enthalpy change (DeltaH(agg)) and the Gibbs free energy change (DeltaG(agg)) for aggregation become more negative down the series, indicating that the hydrophobic interaction between the hydrophobic chains of the surfactant molecules increases and the aggregation process is more spontaneous with increased m/n. The entropy changes of aggregation (DeltaS(agg)) are all positive and TDeltaS(agg) is much larger than |DeltaH(agg)|, revealing that the aggregation process is mainly entropy-driven. However, the calculated Gibbs free energy (DeltaG(DS)) for the interaction between the gemini surfactants and DNA becomes less negative with increased m/n, which reveals that the interaction between the gemini surfactants and DNA tends to be weaker with increased m/n. This is induced by the disruption of the chain-chain hydrophobic interaction between the surfactant molecules at higher m/n, where the entropy change DeltaS(DS) for the interaction process tends to be an unfavorable factor. In addition, the DNA concentration also has a remarkable influence on the interaction.     

Salt effect on the complex formation between cationic gemini surfactant and anionic polyelectrolyte in aqueous solution

Salt effect on the interaction of anionic polyelectrolyte sodium carboxymethylcellulose (NaCMC) with cationic gemini surfactant hexamethylene-1,6-bis(dodecyldimethylammonium bromide) [C12H25(CH3)2N(CH2)6N(CH3)2C12H25]Br2 (C12C6C12Br2) has been investigated using turbidimetric titration, steady-state fluorescence, and mobility measurement. It is found that the critical aggregation concentration(cac) for C12C6C12Br2/NaCMC complexes depends little on addition of sodium bromide (NaBr). However, in the presence of nonionic surfactant Triton X-100 (TX100), the critical ionic surfactant mole fraction for the onset of complex formation (Yc) increases markedly with increasing NaBr concentration. These salt effects are supposed as the overall result from competition between the increase of interaction and the screening of interaction. The increase of interaction is referred to as the effect that the larger micelle with higher surface charge density induced by salt has a stronger interaction with oppositely charged polyelectrolyte. The screening of interaction is referred to as the salt screening of electrostatic attraction between the polymer chain and the surfactant. For complex formation between C12C6C12Br2 and NaCMC, the increase of interaction probably compensates the screening of interaction, leading to constant cac values at different salt concentrations. For complex formation between the C12C6C12Br2/TX100 mixed micelle and NaCMC, the screening of interaction probably plays a dominant role, leading to higher suppression of electrostatic binding of micelles to polyelectrolyte.     

Effect of surfactant structure on the stability of carbon nanotubes in aqueous solution

The suspending behaviors of multiple-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs), including pristine MWNTs (p-MWNTs) and acid-mixture-treated MWNTs (MWNTCOOH), stabilized by cationic single-chain surfactant, dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB), and cationic gemini surfactant hexyl-alpha,beta-bis(dodecyldimethylammonium bromide) (C 12C 6C 12Br 2) were studied systematically. The surfactant structure influences the suspendability of MWNTs dramatically as well as the surfactant adsorption behavior on the nanotubes. Although both the surfactants can disperse the MWNTs effectively, they actually show different stabilizing ability. DTAB is not capable of stabilizing these two MWNTs below critical micelle concentration (CMC). However, C 12C 6C 12Br 2 can suspend both the nanotubes effectively even well below its CMC. Moreover, the adsorption of these two surfactants reaches equilibrium at twice the CMC with the original MWNT concentration of 2 mg/mL, 2 mM for C 12C 6C 12Br 2, and 30 mM for DTAB. After the adsorption equilibrium, the maximum amounts of the two suspended MWNTs in C 12C 6C 12Br 2 solution are about twice as much as those in DTAB solution. The strong hydrophobic interaction among the C 12C 6C 12Br 2 molecules and between the C 12C 6C 12Br 2 molecules and the nanotubes as well as the high charge capacity of C 12C 6C 12Br 2 lead to its much stronger adsorption ability on the MWNTs and result in its superior stabilizing ability for the MWNTs in aqueous phase. The gemini surfactant provides a possibility to effectively stabilize the MWNTs in aqueous solutions even at very low surfactant concentration well below its CMC.