Azole. 44.

The structure analyses of racemic 3‐chloro‐1‐(4‐morpholino‐5‐nitro­imidazol‐1‐yl)­propan‐2‐ol, C₁₀H₁₅ClN₄O₄, (II), and 3‐chloro‐1‐(5‐morpholino‐4‐nitro­imidazol‐1‐yl)­propan‐2‐ol, C₁₀H₁₅ClN₄O₄, (III), have been undertaken in order to determine the position of the morpholine residue in these two isomers. The morpholine residue in (II) is connected at the 4‐position, while in (III), it is connected at the 5‐position of the imidazole ring. The morpholine mean planes and nitro groups in the two compounds deviate from the imidazole planes to different extents. The nitro groups in (II) and (III) take part in the conjugation system of the imidazole rings. In consequence, the exocyclic C—N bonds are significantly shorter than the normal single Csp²—NO₂ bond and the nitro groups in (II) and (III) show an extraordinary stability on treatment with morpholine and piperidine [Gzella, Wrzeciono & Pöppel (1999). Acta Cryst. C 55 , 1562–1565]. In the crystal lattice, the mol­ecules of both compounds are linked by O—H?N and C—H?O intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

2,6‐Diiodo‐4‐nitrophenol, 2,6‐diiodo‐4‐nitrophenyl acetate and 2,6‐diiodo‐4‐nitroanisole: interplay of hydrogen bonds,iodo–nitro interactions and aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions to give supramolecular structures in one,two and three dimensions

In 2,6‐di­iodo‐4‐nitro­phenol, C₆H₃I₂NO₃, the mol­ecules are linked, by an O—H?O hydrogen bond and two iodo–nitro interactions, into sheets, which are further linked into a three‐dimensional framework by aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions. The mol­ecules of 2,6‐di­iodo‐4‐nitro­phenyl acetate, C₈H₅I₂NO₄, lie across a mirror plane in space group Pnma, with the acetyl group on the mirror, and they are linked by a single iodo–nitro interaction to form isolated sheets. The mol­ecules of 2,6‐di­iodo‐4‐nitro­anisole, C₇H₅I₂NO₃, are linked into isolated chains by a single two‐centre iodo–nitro interaction.     

N‐Meth­yl‐N‐(2‐nitro­phen­yl)nitramine and N‐meth­yl‐N‐(3‐nitro­phen­yl)­nitramine

The structures of the two title isomeric compounds (systematic names: N‐meth­yl‐N,2‐dinitro­aniline and N‐meth­yl‐N,3‐di­nitro­aniline, both C₇H₇N₃O₄) are slightly different because they exhibit different steric hindrances and hydrogen‐bonding environments. The aromatic rings are planar. The –N(Me)NO₂ and –NO₂ groups are not coplanar with the rings. Comparison of the geometric parameters of the ortho, meta and para isomers together with those of N‐meth­yl‐N‐phenyl­nitramine suggests that the position of the nitro group has a strong influence on the aromatic ring distortion. The crystal packing is stabilized by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to the nitramine group.     

Four (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐alkoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐trienes

The crystal structures of the four E,Z,E isomers of 1‐(4‐alk­oxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, namely (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐methoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, C₁₉H₁₇NO₃, (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐ethoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, C₂₀H₁₉NO₃, (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐n‐propoxyphen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, C₂₁H₂₁NO₃, and (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐n‐butoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, C₂₂H₂₃NO₃, have been determined. Inter­molecular N⋯O dipole inter­actions between the nitro groups are observed for the meth­oxy derivative, while for the eth­oxy derivative, two adjacent mol­ecules are linked at both ends through N⋯O dipole–dipole inter­actions between the N atom of the nitro group and the O atom of the eth­oxy group to form a supra­molecular ring‐like structure. In the crystal structures of the n‐prop­oxy and n‐but­oxy derivatives, the shortest inter­molecular distances are those between the two O atoms of the alk­oxy groups. Thus, the nearest two mol­ecules form an S‐shaped supra­molecular dimer in these crystal structures.     

3,5‐Di­fluoro‐4‐nitro­pyridine N‐oxide and 3,5‐di­amino‐4‐nitro­pyridine N‐oxide monohydrate

The mol­ecule of 3,5‐di­fluoro‐4‐nitro­pyridine N‐oxide, C₅H₂F₂N₂O₃, is twisted around the C—NO₂ bond by 38.5 (1)°, while the 3,5‐di­amino analogue, 3,5‐di­amino‐4‐nitro­pyridine N‐oxide monohydrate, C₅H₆N₄O₃·H₂O, adopts a planar conformation stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonds, with a significant redistribution of π electrons.     

Three‐dimensional aggregation in 2‐hydroxy‐3‐iodo‐5‐nitrobenzaldehyde involving C—H⋯O,iodo–nitro and aromatic π–π stacking interactions,and isolated dimers in disordered 2,4‐diiodo‐6‐nitroanisole

In 2‐hydroxy‐3‐iodo‐5‐nitro­benz­aldehyde, C₇H₄INO₄, the mol­ecules are linked into sheets by a combination of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and two‐centre iodo–nitro interactions, and these sheets are linked by aromatic π–π stacking interactions. Molecules of 2,4‐di­iodo‐6‐nitro­anisole, C₇H₅I₂NO₃, are disordered, with the nitro group and one of the I substituents each occupying common sets of sites with 0.5 occupancy. The mol­ecules are linked into isolated centrosymmetric dimeric units by a single iodo–nitro interaction.     

4‐Amino derivatives of 7‐nitro‐2,1,3‐benzoxadiazole: the effect of the amino moiety on the structure of fluorophores

The crystal structures of three 4‐amino derivatives of 7‐nitro‐2,1,3‐benzoxa­diazole with increasing substituent ring size, viz. 7‐nitro‐4‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐2,1,3‐benzoxa­diazole, C₁₀H₁₀N₄O₃, 7‐nitro‐4‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)‐2,1,3‐benzoxa­diazole, C₁₁H₁₂N₄O₃, and 4‐(azepan‐1‐yl)‐7‐nitro‐2,1,3‐benzoxa­diazole, C₁₂H₁₄N₄O₃, have been determined in order to understand their photophysical behaviour. All three were found to crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups. There is considerable electron delocalization compared with the parent compound, although the five‐membered oxa­diazole ring apparently does not participate in this. The length of the C—N bond between the amino N atom and the 7‐nitro­benzoxa­diazole system is found to be shorter than in similar compounds, as is the C—N_nitro bond. In each structure, the nitro group lies in the plane of the benzoxa­diazole unit.     

Three structures containing (E)‐1,2‐bis­(benzimidazol‐2‐yl)ethene groups

Two of the title compounds, namely (E)‐1,2‐bis­(1‐methyl­benzimidazol‐2‐yl)ethene, C₁₈H₁₆N₄, (Ib), and (E)‐1,2‐bis­(1‐ethyl­benzimidazol‐2‐yl)ethene, C₂₀H₂₀N₄, (Ic), consist of centrosymmetric trans‐bis­(1‐alkyl­benzimidazol‐2‐yl)ethene mol­ecules, while 3‐eth­yl‐2‐[(E)‐2‐(1‐ethyl­benzimidazol‐2‐yl)­ethen­yl]benzimidazol‐1‐ium perchlorate, C₂₀H₂₁N₄⁺·ClO₄⁻, (II), contains the monoprotonated analogue of compound (Ic). In the three structures, the benzimidazole and benzimidazolium moieties are essentially planar; the geometric parameters for the ethene linkages and their bonds to the aromatic groups are consistent with double and single bonds, respectively, implying little, if any, conjugation of the central C=C bonds with the nitro­gen‐containing rings. The C—N bond lengths in the N=C—N part of the benzimidazole groups differ and are consistent with localized imine C=N and amine C—N linkages in (Ib) and (Ic); in contrast, the corresponding distances in the benzimidazolium cation are equal in (II), consistent with electron delocalization resulting from protonation of the amine N atom. Crystals of (Ib) and (Ic) contain columns of parallel mol­ecules, which are linked by edge‐over‐edge C—H⋯π overlap. The columns are linked to one another by C—H⋯π inter­actions and, in the case of (Ib), C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. Crystals of (II) contain layers of monocations linked by π–π inter­actions and separated by both perchlorate anions and the protruding eth­yl groups; the cations and anions are linked by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

(4S,5S)‐(+)‐4‐Hydro­xy­methyl‐2,5‐di­phenyl­oxazoline

The absolute configuration of the title compound, alter­natively called (+)‐(4,5‐di­hydro‐2,5‐di­phenyl­oxazol‐4‐yl)­methanol, C₁₆H₁₅NO₂, has been confirmed as 4S,5S. The hydroxy­methyl group and phenyl ring at the asymmetric C atoms exhibit β and α orientations, respectively. The exocyclic C—C bonds at the asymmetric C atoms are mutually anticlinal (?ac). The hydroxyl group and the N atom of the oxazoline ring are involved in an intermolecular hydrogen bond leading to chains of mol­ecules.     

A new photochromic tetra­hydro­indolizine

The title compound, di­methyl 10b′‐(4‐fluoro­styryl)‐8′,9′‐di­methoxy‐4‐nitro‐5′,6′‐di­hydrospiro­[9H‐fluorene‐9,1′(10b′H)‐pyrrolo­[2,1‐a]­iso­quinoline]‐2′,3′‐di­carboxyl­ate, C₃₈H₃₁FN₂O₈, is a new photochromic tetra­hydro­indolizine. One of the C—C bonds at the spiro C atom is very long [1.630 (2) Å], thus explaining the photochromic behaviour.     

2,4‐Di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazones of 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde, 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone

In 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate {or 4‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)­hydrazono­methyl]­benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate}, C₁₃H₁₀N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (X), 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­am­ide solvate (or 4‐{1‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]ethyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate), C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (XI), and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate (or 4‐­{[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]phenyl­methyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate), C₁₉H₁₄N₄O₆·C₄H₉NO, (XII), the molecules all lack a center of symmetry, crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups and have been observed to exhibit non‐linear optical activity. In each case, the hydrazone skeleton is fairly planar, facilitated by the presence of two intramolecular hydrogen bonds and some partial N—N double‐bond character. Each molecule is hydrogen bonded to one solvent mol­ecule.     

A combinatorial chemistry approach to new materials for non‐linear optics. I. Five Schiff bases

A combinatorial chemistry approach has been used to synthesize an array of Schiff bases, five of which, namely N‐[(E,2E)‐3‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐3‐nitro­aniline, C₁₆H₁₄N₂O₃, (1a), N‐[(E,2E)‐3‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐4‐nitro­aniline, C₁₆H₁₄N₂O₃, (2a), N‐{(E,2E)‐3‐[4‐(di­methyl­amino)­phenyl]‐2‐propenyl­idene}‐3‐nitro­aniline, C₁₇H₁₇N₃O₂, (1b), N‐{(E,2E)‐3‐[4‐(di­methyl­amino)­phenyl]‐2‐propenyl­idene}‐4‐nitro­aniline, C₁₇H₁₇N₃O₂, (2b), and N‐{(E,2E)‐3‐[4‐(di­methyl­amino)­phenyl]‐2‐propenyl­idene}‐2‐methyl‐4‐nitro­aniline, C₁₈H₁₉N₃O₂, (3b), have been structurally characterized. A stack structure is observed for (1a) and (1b) in the crystal phase. Experimental and calculated molecular structures are discussed for these compounds which belong to a chemical class having potential applications as non‐linear optical materials.     

(N‐Maleoylglycinato)trimethyltin(IV)

The Sn atom in the crystal structure of the title compound,catena‐poly­[trimethyl­tin‐μ‐[(2,5‐di­oxo‐2,5‐di­hydro­pyrrol‐1‐yl)­acetato‐O:O′]], [Sn(CH₃)₃(C₆H₄NO₄)], adopts a distorted trigonal bipyramidal coordination geometry with three methyl groups defining the trigonal plane [mean Sn—C 2.117 (11) Å] and the axial positions occupied by O atoms from different carboxylate groups, with significantly different Sn—O bond lengths [2.207 (5) and 2.358 (6) Å]. The structure forms a polymeric chain of complex molecules linked via carboxylate moieties.     

2‐Chloro­phenyl 3‐nitro­benzene­sulfonate and 2,4‐di­chloro­phenyl 3‐nitro­benzene­sulfonate: supramole­cular aggregation through C–H⋯O, π–π and van der Waals interactions

In 2‐chloro­phenyl 3‐nitro­benzene­sulfonate, C₁₂H₈ClNO₅S, and 2,4‐di­chloro­phenyl 3‐nitro­benzene­sulfonate, C₁₂H₇Cl₂NO₅S, weak C—H⋯O interactions generate S(5), S(6) and (7) rings. The supramolecular aggregation is completed by the presence of π–π interactions and intermolecular van der Waals short contacts.     

Conformation of N‐methyl‐4‐piperidyl 2,4‐dinitrobenzoate

The crystal structure of N‐methyl‐4‐piperidyl 2,4‐di­nitro­benzoate, C₁₃H₁₅N₃O₆, (I), at 130 (2) K reveals that, in the solid state, the mol­ecule exists in the equatorial conformation, (Ieq). Thus, the through‐bond interaction present in the axial conformation, (Iax), is not strong enough to overcome the syn–diaxial interactions between the axial methyl substituent and the axial H atoms on the two piperidyl ring C atoms either side of the ester‐linked ring C atom. The carboxyl­ate group in (I) is orthogonal to the aromatic ring, in contrast with other 2,4‐di­nitro­benzoates, which are coplanar. The piperidyl–ester C—O bond distance is 1.467 (3) Å, which is actually shorter than other equatorial cyclo­hexyl–ester C—O distances. This shorter piperidyl–ester C—O bond distance is due to the reduced electron demand of the orthogonal ester group.     

2,3,4,5,6‐Penta­nitro­aniline 1,2‐dichloro­ethane disolvate: `push–pull' deformation of aromatic rings by intra­molecular charge transfer

The title compound, C₆H₂N₆O₁₀·2C₂H₄Cl₂, forms layered stacks of penta­nitro­aniline mol­ecules, which possess twofold symmetry. The voids between these stacks are occupied by dichloro­ethane mol­ecules, which reside near a 2/m symmetry element and display pseudo‐inversion symmetry. The C atoms in one of the two solvent mol­ecules are threefold disordered. In the penta­nitro­aniline mol­ecule, considerable distortion of the benzenoid ring, coupled with the short C—N(H₂) bond and out‐of‐plane NO₂ twistings, point to significant intra­molecular `push–pull' charge transfer at the amino‐ and nitro‐substituted (ortho and para) positions, as theoretically quantified by natural bond orbital analysis of the π‐electron density.     

Triaquatris(2,6‐dinitrophenolato‐κ2O1,O2)yttrium(III)

In the title compound, [Y(C₆H₃N₂O₅)₃(H₂O)₃], the Y atom is nine‐coordinate with a slightly distorted tricapped trigonal prismatic coordination geometry. The Y^III ion is coordinated to three bidentate 2,6‐di­nitro­phenolate ligands and three water mol­ecules. The Y—O bond distances are in the range 2.217 (3)–2.754 (4) Å, with the Y—O distances from the nitro groups being longer than those from the water mol­ecules and the phenol groups. The coordinated NO₂ groups are almost coplanar with the benzene rings.     

Two intermediates in the synthesis of deca­hydro­iso­quinolines with NMDA and AMPA receptor antagonist activity

In 6‐methyl‐N‐(4‐nitro­benzoyl)‐5,6‐di­hydropyridin‐2(1H)‐one, C₁₃H₁₂N₂O₄, (I), the piperidone ring is in a distorted half‐chair conformation. In 8‐methoxy‐3‐methyl‐N‐(4‐nitro­benzoyl)‐1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8‐octa­hydro­iso­quinoline‐1,6‐dione, C₁₈H₂₀N₂O₆, (II), the heterocyclic ring is in a slightly distorted half‐boat conformation, while the other six‐membered ring is in a distorted chair conformation. Compound (II) presents a strong intramolecular C—H?O hydrogen bond. In both (I) and (II), the mol­ecules interact through C—H?O interactions.     

Ranitidine hydro­chloride,a polymorphic crystal form

In the title compound, di­methyl­({5‐[2‐(1‐methyl­amino‐2‐nitro­eth­enyl­amino)­ethyl­thio­methyl]‐2‐furyl}­methyl)­ammon­ium chloride, C₁₃H₂₃N₄O₃S⁺·­Cl^?, protonation occurs at the di­methyl­amino N atom. The ranitidine mol­ecule adopts an eclipsed conformation. Bond lengths indicate extensive electron delocalization in the N,N′‐di­methyl‐2‐nitro‐1,1‐ethenedi­amine system of the mol­ecule. The nitro and methyl­amino groups are trans across the side chain C=C double bond, while the ethyl­amino and nitro groups are cis. The Cl^? ions link mol­ecules through hydrogen bonds.     

Structural properties of a series of photochromic fluorinated indolylfulgides

Fluorinated indolyl­fulgides are a class of photochromic organic compounds that meet many of the requirements for use as optical memory media and optical switches. The X‐ray crystal structures of a series of five photochromic fluorinated indolyl­fulgides have been determined, namely (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐di­methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,2‐tri­fluoro­ethyl­idene]‐4‐(1‐methyl­ethyl­idene)­dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (tri­fluoro­methyl­iso­propyl­idene­indolyl­fulgide), C₁₉H₁₆F₃NO₃, (I), (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐dimethyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,3,3,3‐penta­fluoro­propyl­idene]‐4‐(1‐methyl­ethyl­idene)­dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (penta­fluoro­ethyl­iso­propyl­idene­indolyl­fulgide), C₂₀H₁₆F₅NO₃, (II), (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐di­methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,3,3,4,4,4‐hepta­fluoro­butyl­idene]‐4‐(1‐methyl­ethyl­idene)­dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (hepta­fluoro­propyl­iso­propyl­idene­indolyl­fulgide), C₂₁H₁₆F₇NO₃, (III), (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐di­methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,2‐tri­fluoro­ethyl­idene]‐4‐(tri­cyclo­[3.3.1.1^3,7]­decyl­idene­)dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (tri­fluoro­methyl­adamantyl­idene­indolyl­fulgide), C₂₆H₂₄F₃NO₃, (IV), and (3Z)‐3‐[1‐(1,2‐di­methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2,2,3,3,4,4,4‐hepta­fluoro­butyl­idene]‐4‐(tri­cyclo­[3.3.1.1^3,7]­decyl­idene­)dihydrofuran‐2,5‐dione (hepta­fluoro­propyl­adamantylidenein­dolyl­fulgide), C₂₈H₂₄F₇NO₃, (V). The photochromic property of fulgides is based on the photochemically allowed electrocyclic ring closure of a hexatriene system to form a cyclo­hexa­diene. For each fulgide examined, the bond lengths within the hexatriene system alternate between short and long, as expected. Comparing the structures of the five fulgides with each other demonstrates no significant difference in bond lengths, bond angles or dihedral angles within the hexatriene systems. The distance between the bond‐forming C atoms at each end of the hexatriene system does vary. Correlations of structural properties with optical properties are addressed.