trans‐Diaceto­nitrilebis­(di‐2‐pyridyl sulfide‐N,N′)ruthenium(II) bis­(tetra­fluoro­borate) monohydrate

The title complex, [Ru(C₁₀H₈N₂S)₂(CH₃CN)₂](BF₄)₂·H₂O, is the product of the solvolysis of [Ru(dps‐N,N)₂(dps‐N,S)](PF₆)₂ (dps is di‐2‐pyridyl sulfide) in the presence of HBF₄ in acetone–aceto­nitrile at room temperature. There are two independent cations, with the Ru atoms on inversion centres; each Ru atom has an octahedral geometry with the dps mol­ecules behaving as N,N′‐bidentate ligands and assuming a trans arrangement.     

Aqua­bis­(benzo­nitrile)(o‐benzo­quin­one di­imine)(tri­phenyl­phosphine)­ruthenium(II) bis­(tetra­fluoro­borate) hydrate

The Ru atom in the title compound, [Ru(C₆H₅CN)₂{P(C₆H₅)₃}{C₆H₄(NH)₂}(H₂O)](BF₄)₂·H₂O, has six‐coordinate octahedral geometry, with a trans arrangement of the tri­phenyl­phosphine ligand and the water mol­ecule. The asymmetric unit contains one complex cation, two tetra­fluoro­borate anions and one solvent water mol­ecule, which is disordered over two sites (ratio of occupancies 0.70:0.30).     

2,3,4,5‐Tetrakis­[(2‐hydroxy­ethyl)­thio]­tetra­thia­fulvalene tetra­fluoro­borate

The title complex, C₁₄H₂₀O₄S₈^+.BF₄^?, is a charge‐transfer complex with typical charges for the donor and anion of +1 and ?1, respectively. Two centrosymmetrically related donors form a face‐to‐face π‐dimer with a strong intermolecular S?S interaction. These π‐dimers stack along the a axis to form a donor column. The structure is extensively hydrogen bonded.     

High‐temperature phase of trans‐tetra­aqua­bis­(tri­fluoro­acetato‐O)­manganese(II)

The title compound, [Mn(CF₃COO)₂(H₂O)₄], crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c. At about 215 K, it undergoes a reversible phase transition, which leads to crystal twinning. The crystal structure of the high‐temperature phase was determined at 220 K. The Mn²⁺ ion lies on a twofold axis and is octahedrally coordinated by two monodentate tri­fluoro­acetate ligands in apical positions and by four equatorial aqua ligands, two of which lie on the twofold axis. Hydro­gen‐bonding interactions connect the complex mol­ecules, generating a three–dimensional network.     

Neutral bis­(ethyl­enedi­thio)­tetra­thia­fulvalene at 100 K

The low‐temperature crystal structure of bis­(ethyl­enedi­thio)­tetra­thia­fulvalene (BEDT‐TTF), C₁₀H₈S₈, is similar to its high‐temperature structure. The room‐temperature central bond lengths of this mol­ecule are often used as reference in empirical methods to estimate the charge carried by the (BEDT‐TTF)_xⁿ⁺ cations in the BEDT‐TTF mol­ecule‐based organic conductors. We show that the method we previously reported can still be used with low‐temperature BEDT‐TTF salts data. Moreover, we confirm the purely thermal origin of the ordering of the ethyl­ene group.     

Inhibition of a palladium(II) catalyst upon formation of a di‐μ‐chloro complex: di‐μ‐chloro‐bis­[1,2‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ethane‐P,P′]dipalladium(II) bis­(tetra­fluoro­borate) bis­(deutero­chloro­form) solvate

The title compound was formed upon slow evaporation of a solution of the solvated dicationic complex bis­(aceto­nitrile)­bis­[1,2‐bis­(di­phenyl‐phosphino)­ethane]­palladium(II) bis(tetra­fluoro­borate) in deuterated chloro­form. The dinucleur palladium complex forms triclinic crystals and there is an inversion center between the Pd atoms. Compared to the corresponding monomeric compound, the Cl—Pd—Cl angles decrease upon briding from 94.19 (7) to 86.96 (4)°.     

Bis[bis­(methoxy­carbimido)amine‐κ2N,N′]bis­(perchlorato‐κO)copper(II) bis­[bis­(methoxy­carbimido)amine‐κ2N,N′]bis­(methanol‐κO)copper(II) bis­(perchlorate) methanol disolvate

The title compound, [Cu(ClO₄)₂(C₄H₉N₃O₂)₂][Cu(C₄H₉N₃O₂)₂(CH₄O)₂](ClO₄)₂·2CH₃OH, comprises two independent Cu^II species lying on different inversion sites. In the Cu complexes, a distorted octa­hedral geometry arises (from basic square‐planar N₄ coordination) from the weak coordination of two perchlorate ions (as Cu—O) in one species and two methanol mol­ecules in the other (also as Cu—O). Inter­actions between the O atoms of the perchlorate anions or methanol groups and the imide or amine NH groups afford an extensive inter­molecular hydrogen‐bonding network.     

Second‐sphere coordination in anion binding: sodium hexa­ammine­cobalt(III) tetra­kis­(4‐fluoro­benzoate) monohydrate

In sodium hexa­amminecobalt(III) tetra­kis­(4‐fluoro­benzoate) monohydrate, Na[Co(NH₃)₆](C₇H₄FO₂)₄·H₂O, determined at 180 K, [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ cations lie on centres of inversion and form layers in which their C₄ axes lie perpendicular to the layer planes. 4‐Fluoro­benzoate anions lie on twofold axes and general positions and adopt near‐planar geometries. Na⁺ cations and water mol­ecules lie on twofold axes, forming [NaO₅] square pyramids that lie between the [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ cations. The second‐sphere inter­actions between [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ cations and 4‐fluorobenzoate anions comprise edge‐to‐face and vertex‐to‐face arrangements. The structure is closely comparable with that of the benzoic acid salt, demonstrating that fluorination of the anion in the para position has no significant influence on the second‐sphere inter­actions and minimal influence on the gross crystal structure.     

The monoclinic polymorph of rac‐5,7,7,12,12,14‐hexa­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazonia­cyclo­tetra­decane bis­(hexa­fluoro­germanate) tetrahydrate

X‐ray data were obtained for the monoclinic polymorph of rac‐5,7,7,12,12,14‐hexa­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazonia­cyclo­tetra­decane bis­(hexa­fluoro­germanate) tetrahydrate, (C₁₆H₄₀N₄)[GeF₆]₂·4H₂O. The tetra­aza‐macrocyclic cations lie across inversion centers in space group P2₁/c. Water mol­ecules and [GeF₆]²⁻ anions form zigzag chains, which alternate in a three‐dimensional network with the macrocyclic cations. The structure is sustained by multiple hydrogen bonds.     

Rubidium bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonyl)­imidate dioxane disolvate

The bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonyl)­imidate anion crystallizes with Rb as the title dioxane 1:2 solvate, Rb⁺·CF₃SO₂NSO₂CF₃⁻·2C₄H₈O₂, with the anion in a transoid conformation, as opposed to the cisoid form typically seen when there are significant cation–anion interactions. The Rb^I cation is eight‐coordinate, interacting with one anion in a chelating fashion and with two other anions through the remaining sulfonyl O atoms. The latter interactions link ion pairs through the formation of Rb₂O₂ dimers about inversion centers at (0, , 0) and (, , 0), forming extended columns which run parallel to the a axis of the unit cell. Rb–dioxane bridges crosslink these salt columns in the (010), (001) and (011) directions, resulting in a three‐dimensional network solid. One dioxane solvent mol­ecule is disordered over two half‐occupancy sites.     

Di­chloro­bis­(di­benzyl­amino)­bis­(tetra­hydro­furan)­zirconium(IV) toluene hemisolvate

The title complex, [ZrCl₂(C₄H₈O)₂(C₁₄H₁₄N)₂]·0.5C₇H₈, was prepared in an unusual manner by utilizing [Mg{N(CH₂Ph)₂}₂] as a ligand transfer reagent. The Zr atom lies in a distorted octahedral environment where steric repulsion from the large di­benzyl­amino ligands leads to a widening of the N—Zr—N angle [99.95 (9)°] and corresponding compression of other angles [Cl—Zr—Cl 160.95 (3)° and O—Zr—O 78.22 (7)°]. This distortion is compared with those found in the previously determined structures of the di­methyl­amino and diethyl­amino analogues.     

Bis­(ethyl­enedi­amine‐N,N′)(pyrimidine‐2‐carboxyl­ato‐N1,O)­cobalt(III) bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate) dihydrate

In the title compound, the coordination geometry of the Co^III atom is only slightly distorted from regular octahedral, and the racemic nature of the material was confirmed by X‐ray structure analysis.     

(Aceto­nitrile)­[2,6‐bis­(pyrazol‐1‐yl)­pyridine](isonicotin­amide)copper(II)–tetra­fluoro­borate–aceto­nitrile (1/2/2)

Molecules of the title compound, [Cu(C₂H₃N)(C₁₁H₉N₅)(C₆H₆N₂O)](BF₄)₂·2C₂H₃N, comprise (aceto­nitrile)[2,6‐bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)­pyridine](isonicotin­amide)copper(II) cations, tetra­fluoro­borate anions and lattice aceto­nitrile mol­ecules. The cations have distorted square‐pyramidal geometries in which the N₃‐donor, viz. 2,6‐bis­(pyrazol‐1‐yl)­pyridine, and the N‐donor, viz. the isonicotin­amide ligand, occupy the four basal positions, with the coordinated aceto­nitrile N‐donor atom occupying the apical position. Pairs of cations are linked by N—H?F hydrogen bonds through tetra­fluoro­borate anions, forming centrosymmetric dimers, which are further linked by C—H?O hydrogen bonds into two‐dimensional undulating sheets, three of which interpenetrate to generate a two‐dimensional network.     

Di‐μ‐hydro­xo‐bis­(diiso­propyl­gallium)–1,4,8,11‐tetra­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane (1/1)

The hydro­lysis product [Ga₂(C₃H₇)₄(OH)₂]·C₁₄H₃₂N₄, derived from the tetrakis­(triiso­propyl­gallium)–1,4,8,11‐tetra­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane (1/1) adduct, consists of a centrosymmetric [ⁱPr₂Ga(μ‐OH)]₂ unit hydrogen bonded through the hydroxyl group to a nitro­gen on an adjacent centrosymmetric 1,4,8,11‐tetra­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane molecule, resulting in the generation of a molecular chain through the crystal.     

(Azido‐κN)bis­(di‐2‐pyridylamine)­copper(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate and (azido‐κN)bis­(di‐2‐pyridylamine)­copper(II) chloride tetra­hydrate

The two new title complexes, [Cu(N₃)(dpyam)₂]PF₆ (dpyam is di‐2‐pyridylamine, C₁₀H₁₁N₃), (I), and [Cu(N₃)(dpyam)₂]Cl·4H₂O, (II), respectively, have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Both complexes display a distorted square‐pyramidal geometry. Each Cu atom is coordinated in the basal plane by three dpyam N atoms and one azide N atom in equatorial positions, and by another N atom from the dpyam group in the apical position. In complex (I), the one‐dimensional supra­molecular architecture is assembled via hydrogen‐bonding inter­actions between the amine N atom and terminal azide N atoms and the F atoms of the PF₆⁻ anion. For complex (II), hydrogen‐bonding inter­actions between the amine N atom, the Cl⁻ anion and water O atoms result in a two‐dimensional lattice.     

μ‐Oxo‐bis­[(2,3,12,13‐tetra­bromo‐5,10,15,20‐tetra­phenyl­porphyrinato)­iron(III)] bis­(di­chloro­methane) solvate

The precise structure of the title compound, [Fe₂O(C₄₄H₂₄Br₄N₄)₂]·2CH₂Cl₂, is reported. The Fe—N distances are non‐equivalent in pairs because of the asymmetric peripheral substitution; the values are 2.098 Å to the brominated rings and 2.041 Å to the other two rings. The Fe—O bond distance is 1.7583 (4) Å. The mol­ecule has required twofold symmetry so that there is one unique porphyrin macrocycle and one Fe—O bond length in contrast to a previous report on the same species.     

Bis­[bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino­methyl)­phenyl­phosphine]­di­chloro­tetra­gold(I) bis­[chloro­tris­(penta­fluoro­phenyl)­aurate(III)]

The cation of the title compound, [Au₄(PPh₂CH₂PPhCH₂PPh₂)₂Cl₂][Au(C₆F₅)₃Cl]₂ or [Au₄Cl₂(C₃₂H₂₉P₃)₂][AuCl(C₆F₅)₃]₂, displays a rhomboidal geometry for the Au atoms, with short Au?Au distances of 3.104 (2) and 3.185 (1) Å; the linear coordination at the Au^I atoms is distorted: P—Au—P 164.7 (2)° and P—Au—Cl 170.67 (11)°. The anion shows the expected square‐planar geometry at Au^III, with the Au atom 0.022 (5) Å out of the plane of the four donor atoms.     

A magnesium–bis­(di­aryldiketiminate) complex

The 1:1 of reaction of di­butyl­magnesium with the ligand 2‐[(2‐iso­propyl­phenyl)­amino]‐4‐[(2‐iso­propyl­phenyl)­imino]­pent‐2‐ene gives only the 1:2 metal–ligand compound bis­[N,N′‐bis(2‐iso­propyl­phenyl)­pentane‐2,4‐diiminato]­magnesium(II), [Mg(C₂₃H₂₉N₂)₂], as an isolated solid. The coordination geometry about the Mg atom is distorted tetrahedral [N—Mg—N angles range from 90.73 (5) to 136.40 (6)°], with the metal lying out of the ligand plane. The ligands themselves have non‐crystallographic C_s geometry. The structure is isotypic with the Zn analogue, and the small differences between these two structures provide evidence for a significant covalent contribution to bonds that are generally described as largely ionic.     

A main‐group donor–acceptor adduct: 1,3,4,5‐tetra­methyl­imidazol‐2‐yl­idene–tris­(penta­fluoro­phenyl)borane

The solid‐state structural analysis of the title compound, Me₄C₂N₂C→B(C₆F₅)₃ or C₂₅H₁₂BF₁₅N₂, provides useful metric parameters for the qualitative comparison of the donor strength with other mono‐ and dicoordinate main‐group compounds which feature distinctive lone‐pair character.     

l‐Argininamidium bis­(hydrogen­squarate)

Cations and anions of the title compound {systematic name: 1‐[4‐(amino­carbonyl)butyl]guanidinium bis­(hydrogen­squarate)}, C₆H₁₇N₅O²⁺·2C₄HO₄⁻, are connected into a three‐dimensional network by inter­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the l ‐argininamidium ammonium, amide and guanidinium functions and the hydrogensquarate carbonyl O atoms. The independent hydrogensquarate monoanions are linked into dimers by pairs of O—H⋯O′ hydrogen bonds.