Two‐Photon Chemistry in Ruthenium 2,2′‐Bipyridyl‐Functionalized Single‐Wall Carbon Nanotubes

Ruthenium polypyridyl complexes are widely used as light harvesters in dye‐sensitized solar cells. Since one of the potential applications of single‐wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and their derived materials is their use as active components in organic and hybrid solar cells, the study of the photochemistry of SWCNTs with tethered ruthenium polypyridyl complexes is important. A water‐soluble ruthenium tris(bipyridyl) complex linked through peptidic bonds to SWCNTs (Ru‐SWCNTs) was prepared by radical addition of thiol‐terminated SWCNT to a terminal C?C double bond of a bipyridyl ligand of the ruthenium tris(bipyridyl) complex. The resulting macromolecular Ru‐SWCNT (≈500 nm, 15.6 % ruthenium complex content) was water‐soluble and was characterized by using TEM, thermogravimetric analysis, chemical analysis, and optical spectroscopy. The emission of Ru‐SWCNT is 1.6 times weaker than that of a mixture of [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ and SWCNT of similar concentration. Time‐resolved absorption optical spectroscopy allows the detection of the [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺‐excited triplet and [Ru(bpy)₃]⁺. The laser flash studies reveal that Ru‐SWCNT exhibits an unprecedented two‐photon process that is enabled by the semiconducting properties of the SWCNT. Thus, the effect of the excitation wavelength and laser power on the transient spectra indicate that upon excitation of two [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ complexes of Ru‐SWCNT, a disproportionation process occurs leading to delayed formation of [Ru(bpy)₃]⁺ and the performance of the SWCNT as a semiconductor. This two‐photon delayed [Ru(bpy)₃]⁺ generation is not observed in the photolysis of [Ru(bpy)₃]³⁺; SWCNT acts as an electron wire or electron relay in the disproportionation of two [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ triplets in a process that illustrates that the SWCNT plays a key role in the process. We propose a mechanism for this two‐photon disproportionation compatible with i) the need for high laser flux, ii) the long lifetime of the [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ triplets, iii) the semiconducting properties of the SWNT, and iv) the energy of the HOMO/LUMO levels involved.     

Effect of a carboxyl group on the chemiluminescent reaction of tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(III) with aliphatic amines

The effect of a carboxyl group beside nitrogen of aliphatic amines on the tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(III), Ru(bpy)₃³⁺, chemiluminescent reaction was examined. It has been shown that a carboxylate anion promotes the chemiluminescent reaction at a lower pH and then the aliphatic amines with this substituent can be sensitively detected compared with corresponding aliphatic amines without this substituent. Based on this finding, preliminary studies on simultaneous determination of 4-hydroxyproline, N-methylglycine, N-methylalanine, proline, and pipecolic acid in human serum have been performed using isocratic reversed-phase ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrogenerated Ru(bpy)₃³⁺ chemiluminescent detection. The detection limits (signal-to-noise ratio of 3) with the proposed method were 3.0, 12, 2.7, 4.6, and 10 nM for 4-hydroxyproline, N-methylglycine, N-methylalanine, proline, and pipecolic acid, respectively.     

Electrochemiluminescence of Tris(2,2′‐bipyridine)ruthenium with Various Co‐reactants under Ultrasound Irradiation

Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) of tris(2,2′‐bipyridine)ruthenium, Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ in the presence of various co‐reactants, such as tripropylamine (TPA), oxalate ion (C₂O₄^2?), ascorbic acid (H₂A) and dehydroascorbic acid (DHA), were investigated under ultrasound irradiation. In sono‐ECL experiments, an indium‐thin‐oxide (ITO) was used as working electrode, and a titanium tipped sonic horn probe (diameter 2 mm) which operated at a frequency of 20 kHz was set in the front of the ITO electrode. Under the ultrasound irradiation, ECL signals were found to be significantly enhanced when TPA and C₂O₄^2? were used as co‐reactants, only slightly enhanced in Ru(bpy)₃²⁺/DHA system, but total quenched in Ru(bpy)₃²⁺/H₂A system. The difference of Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ ECL behaviors for various co‐reactant could to be due to the different kinetics of catalytic reactions associated in ECL schemes. ECL quenching effect observed in Ru(bpy)₃²⁺/H₂A system was suggested to be due to electron transfer (ET) route between the excited state *Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ and ascorbate anion HA^? diffused from the bulk solution, where the diffusional HA^? species served as electron donor. The effect becomes more pronounced upon sonication because the effective collision frequency between *Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ and HA^? would be significantly increased by the enhanced mass transport effect of ultrasound.     

Controlling Metal–Ligand–Metal Oxidation State Combinations by Ancillary Ligand (L) Variation in the Redox Systems [L2Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL2]n,boptz=3,6‐bis(2‐oxidophenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine,and L=acetylacetonate, 2,2′‐bipyridine,or 2‐phenylazopyridine

The new compounds [(acac)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(acac)₂] ( 1 ), [(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 2 ‐(ClO₄)₂), and [(pap)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(pap)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 3 ‐(ClO₄)₂) were obtained from 3,6‐bis(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine (H₂boptz), the crystal structure analysis of which is reported. Compound 1 contains two antiferromagnetically coupled (J=?36.7 cm^?1) Ru^III centers. We have investigated the role of both the donor and acceptor functions containing the boptz^2? bridging ligand in combination with the electronically different ancillary ligands (donating acac^?, moderately π‐accepting bpy, and strongly π‐accepting pap; acac=acetylacetonate, bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine pap=2‐phenylazopyridine) by using cyclic voltammetry, spectroelectrochemistry and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy for several in situ accessible redox states. We found that metal–ligand–metal oxidation state combinations remain invariant to ancillary ligand change in some instances; however, three isoelectronic paramagnetic cores Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru showed remarkable differences. The excellent tolerance of the bpy co ‐ ligand for both Ru^III and Ru^II is demonstrated by the adoption of the mixed ‐ valent form in [L₂Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL₂]³⁺, L=bpy, whereas the corresponding system with pap stabilizes the Ru^II states to yield a phenoxyl radical ligand and the compound with L=acac^? contains two Ru^III centers connected by a tetrazine radical‐anion bridge.     

The Factors Affecting the Electrochemiluminescence of Tris(2,2′‐bipyridyl)Ruthenium(II)/Tertiary Amines

Factors affecting tris(2,2′‐bipyridyl) ruthenium(II) (Ru(bpy)₃²⁺)/tertiary amine electrochemiluminescence (ECL) were investigated in the present work with several tertiary amines as coreactants. Some new phenomena different to those of traditional Ru(bpy)₃²⁺/tripropylamine were observed, such as the different responses of different coreactants to the hydrophobic nature of the working electrode and the ECL emission of triethanolamine at 0.85 V. The pK_a value (acid dissociation constant) for the deprotonation of tertiary amine group in the coreactant molecules and solubility of coreactants affect the ECL profiles vs. electrolyte pH. Moreover, the solubility of coreactants is also related to the ECL response to the addition of surfactants and electrode hydrophobic nature. Investigation of the effects of molecular structures indicated that molecules restricting the formation of the trigonal planar structure of the active radical in the electrooxidation procedure resulted in low ECL emission. The behaviors of hydroxyl and carboxylic group as substituents of α‐carbon are also totally different to the traditional opinions about the ECL from Ru(bpy)₃²⁺/tertiary amines.     

Luminescent polymeric ruthenium complexes with polystyrene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) macroligands: The sequential activation of initiator sites for blocks generated by parallel polymerization mechanisms

The synthesis of polystyrene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) diblock copolymers with a luminescent ruthenium(II) tris(bipyridine) [Ru(bpy)₃] complex at the block junction is described. The macroligand precursor, polystyrene bipyridine‐poly(methyl methacrylate) [bpy(PS–H)(PMMA)], was synthesized via the atom transfer radical polymerization of styrene and methyl methacrylate from two independent, sequentially activated initiating sites. Both polymerization steps resulted in the growth of blocks with sizes consistent with monomer loading and narrow molecular weight distributions (i.e., polydispersity index < 1.3). Subsequent reactions with ruthenium(II) bis(bipyridine) dichloride [Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂] in the presence of Ag⁺ generated the ruthenium tris(bipyridine)‐centered diblock, which is of interest for the imaging of block copolymer microstructures and for incorporation into new photonic materials. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 4250–4255, 2002     

Efficiency of polymer sensitizer in photosensitized reaction of tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II) complex-containing polymer

Photochemical properties of Ru(bpy)₂(poly-4-methyl-4′-vinyl-2,2′-bipyridine)Cl₂ ( 2 ) were studied and compared with that of Ru(bpy)₃Cl₂. Continuous irradiation of a solution, which contains polymer 2 as a photosensitizer, methylviologen (MV²⁺) or 4,4′-bipyridinium-1,1′-bis(trimethylenesulfonate) (SPV) as an electron acceptor and triethanolamine (TEOA) as a sacrificial donor, resulted in the formation of viologen radical ion (MV⁺ or SPV^?). The rate of formation of MV⁺ or SPV^? for the polymer 2 system was smaller than that for the Ru(bpy)₃ Cl₂ systems. The reason for this fact was kinetically analyzed by quenching experiments of excited Ru(II) complexes by MV²⁺ or SPV, the photosensitized reactions of the TEOA–Ru(II) complex–MV²⁺ or -SPV systems, and the dye laser photolysis of the Ru(II) complex–MV²⁺ or -SPV systems.     

Preparation and photoluminescence characteristics of polysiloxane pendant tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium (II) complex

Polysiloxanes containing pendant tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) complex (Ru(bpy)3²⁺) were prepared by reaction of polysiloxane-pendant 2,2′-bipyridine (PSiO-bpy) with cis-Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂. In methanol solution, the polymer pendant Ru(bpy)3²⁺ showed absorption maximum at 456nm and emission maximum at around 609nm, both of which are shifted to longer wavelength than the monomeric Ru(bpy)₃²⁺. The lifetime τ₀ of the excited polymer complex with low Ru(bpy)3²⁺ content was almost the same as that of the monomeric one in methanol (830ns), but τ₀ of the polymer with higher complex content was shorter because of a concentration quenching. In a solid state, τ₀ was much shorter (306–503ns) than that in a methanol solution contrary to the conventional polymeric system. Higher complex content in the polymer film caused higher glass transition temperature (Tg), but shorter τ₀. These results indicate concentration quenching in the polymer film. The excited polymer pendant Ru(bpy)3²⁺ was quenched by oxygen, and the relative emission intensity followed the Stern-Volmer equation. In a methanol solution the quenching rate constant (k_q) was the same order of magnitude as the monomeric complex, and independent of the complex content in the polymer. In a film, k_q was higher for the polymer with higher complex content.     

A Highly Efficient and Selective Aerobic Cross‐Dehydrogenative‐Coupling Reaction Photocatalyzed by a Platinum(II) Terpyridyl Complex

Thanks to the superior redox potential of platinum(II) complex compared with that of Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ in the excited state, an efficient and selective visible‐light‐induced CDC reaction has been developed by using a catalytic amount (0.25 %) of 1 . With the aid of FeSO₄ (2 equiv), the corresponding amide could not be detected under visible‐light irradiation (λ=450 nm), but the desired cross‐coupling product was exclusively obtained under ambient air conditions. A spectroscopic study and product analysis revealed that the CDC reaction is initiated by photoinduced electron‐transfer from N‐phenyltetrahydroisoquinoline to the complex. An EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance) experiment provides direct evidence on the generation of superoxide radical anion (O₂^{? .} ) rather than singlet oxygen (¹O₂) under irradiation of the reaction system, in contrast to that reported in the literature. Combined, the photoinduced electron‐transfer and subsequent formation of superoxide radical anion (O₂^{? .} ) results in a clean and facile transformation.     

2,3‐Di(2‐pyridyl)‐5‐phenylpyrazine: A NN‐CNN‐Type Bridging Ligand for Dinuclear Transition‐Metal Complexes

A new bridging ligand, 2,3‐di(2‐pyridyl)‐5‐phenylpyrazine (dpppzH), has been synthesized. This ligand was designed so that it could bind two metals through a NN‐CNN‐type coordination mode. The reaction of dpppzH with cis‐[(bpy)₂RuCl₂] (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine) affords monoruthenium complex [(bpy)₂Ru(dpppzH)]²⁺ ( 12+ ) in 64 % yield, in which dpppzH behaves as a NN bidentate ligand. The asymmetric biruthenium complex [(bpy)₂Ru(dpppz)Ru(Mebip)]³⁺ ( 23+ ) was prepared from complex 12+ and [(Mebip)RuCl₃] (Mebip=bis(N‐methylbenzimidazolyl)pyridine), in which one hydrogen atom on the phenyl ring of dpppzH is lost and the bridging ligand binds to the second ruthenium atom in a CNN tridentate fashion. In addition, the RuPt heterobimetallic complex [(bpy)₂Ru(dpppz)Pt(C?CPh)]²⁺ ( 42+ ) has been prepared from complex 12+ , in which the bridging ligand binds to the platinum atom through a CNN binding mode. The electronic properties of these complexes have been probed by using electrochemical and spectroscopic techniques and studied by theoretical calculations. Complex 12+ is emissive at room temperature, with an emission λ_max=695 nm. No emission was detected for complex 23+ at room temperature in MeCN, whereas complex 42+ displayed an emission at about 750 nm. The emission properties of these complexes are compared to those of previously reported Ru and RuPt bimetallic complexes with a related ligand, 2,3‐di(2‐pyridyl)‐5,6‐diphenylpyrazine.     

Chemiluminescence in the oxidation of sodium anthracenide and pyrenide by a RuIII complex

Chemiluminescence (CL) during oxidation of organosodium compounds of anthracene and pyrene in THF by a Ru(bpy)₃ ²⁺ complex was studied. Excited singlet states of anthracene and pyrene (¹R^*) and a Ru(bpy)₃ ^2+* complex were identified as CL emitters. A mechanism for the generation of the excited states in electron transfer reactions resulting in the formation of Ru(bpy)₃ ^2+* and triplet states of hydrocarbons (³R^*) was proposed. The direct formation of a singlet state from the radical anion is energetically impossible. Therefore¹R^* is generated in the triplet-triplet annihilation³R^*+³R^*→¹R^*+R, whereas Ru(bpy)₃ ^2+* can be formed in the reaction of Ru(bpy)₃ ³⁺ with Ru(bpy)₃ ¹⁺ or by the energy transfer from¹R^* to Ru(bpy)₃ ²⁺. Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 3, pp. 609–611, March, 1997.     

Cuso4‐amine redox‐initiated radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate mediated by a CuCl2 complex: Homogeneous reverse ATRP

Kinetic results of CuSO₄/2,2'‐bipyridine(bPy)‐amine redox initiated radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) at 70 to 90 °C in dimethylsulfoxide suggest that such initiation is characteristic of a slow rate and a low initiator efficiency, but tertiary amines exhibit a relatively higher rate. UV‐Vis spectroscopy confirms the alpha‐amino functionality of PMMA chains. CuCl₂/bPy successfully mediates the redox‐initiated radical polymerization of MMA with aliphatic tertiary amines in a fashion of slow‐initiated reverse atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), i.e. both the initiator efficiency of aliphatic tertiary amines and the average molecular weight of PMMA increase gradually, while the molecular weight distribution remains narrow but become broader with the conversions. As the PMMA chains contain alpha amino and omega C‐Cl moieties, UV‐induced benzophenone‐initiated radical polymerization and Cu^ICl/bPy‐catalyzed ATRP initiated from PMMA lead to block copolymers from terminal functionalities. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 2562‐2578     

Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence Sensor Based on Tris(2,2′‐bipyridine)ruthenium(II)‐Immobilized Natural Clay and Ionic Liquid

A novel electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) sensor based on natural clay and ionic liquid was fabricated. Tris(2,2′‐bipyridine)ruthenium(II) (Ru(bpy)₃²⁺) was immobilized on natural clay surface through simple adsorption. An ECL sensor was prepared by mixing Ru(bpy)₃²⁺‐incorporated clay, graphite powder and an ionic liquid (1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate) as the binder. The electrochemical behavior and ECL of the immobilized Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ was investigated. It was observed that the ECL of immobilized Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ was activated by the ionic liquid. The proposed ECL sensor showed high sensitivity to tri‐n‐propylamine (TPrA) and the detection limit was found to be 20 pM. In addition, the ECL sensor displayed good stability for TPrA detection and long‐term storage stability.     

Construction and Characterization of Ru(II)Tris(bipyridine)‐Based Silica Thin Film Electrochemiluminescent Sensors

Ru(II) tris‐bipyridine based ECL sensors were produced by embedding the complex inside silica glass thin films deposited via a sol‐gel dipping procedure on K‐glass conducing substrates. Films were prepared starting from a pre‐hydrolyzed ethanolic solution of Si(OC₂H₅)₄ and Ru(bpy)₃Cl₂. Transparent, crack‐free and homogeneous reddish silica layers, having a thickness of 200±20 nm, were obtained. The films, either deposited at room temperature or thermally annealed at 100, 200 and 300 °C for 30 h, were structurally and chemically characterized. Ru(bpy)₃Cl₂ thermal stability was previously checked by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The films were investigated by X‐Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and UV‐vis spectroscopy. XPS in‐depth profiles revealed a homogeneous distribution of the ruthenium complex inside the silica thin layers. SIMS data suggested that the embedded Ru(bpy)₃Cl₂ did not react with oxygen inside the oxygen‐rich silica matrix to give Ru‐O bonds. Electrochemical and ECL characterization of the thin film electrodes were made by means of cyclic voltammetry (CV) and controlled potential step experiments. The ECL sensor showed a diffusive redox behavior of the Ru(bpy)₃²⁺/Ru(bpy)₃³⁺ system. Light emission produced from the reaction between oxalic acid and the electrogenerated Ru(bpy)₃³⁺ was larger and stable when thermally treated electrodes were used after a suitable hydration period. The 300 °C treated sample was the best performing sensor both in terms of low complex leakage and sensitivity. Calibration plots relative to oxalic acid were obtained both in stationary and in flowing solutions in the concentration range 2×10^?6?3×10^?4 M. A linear behavior appeared in the former case, while in the latter a slight curvature was evident as a consequence of a finite diffusion time of the analyte inside the thin film. The signal repeatability, obtained by multiple 100 μL of 10^?5 M oxalic acid injections in flowing solutions, was better than 4%. The obtained detection limit (computed as three times the standard deviation of the base‐line noise) was 10^?6 M as oxalic acid.     

Electrochemiluminescence of SDBS‐Ru(bpy)32+‐CPM System and Its Application

When the concentration of dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid sodium salt (SDBS) is 0.7 mmol·L^?1, the electrochemical and electrochemiluminescence (ECL) intensity of Ru(bpy)₃²⁺‐chlorpheniramine maleate (CPM) system at the Au electrode were studied. The results showed that compared with the absence of SDBS, enhancement of the ECL intensity was 14‐fold at Au electrode. Base on this, an ECL method was established for efficient and simple determination of CPM at Au electrode. Under the optimum experimental condition, the enhanced ECL intensities had good linear relationship with the concentration of CPM in the range of 1.0×10^?4–1.0×10^?7 mol·L^?1, and a linear regression equation was obtained as follows: I (counts)=48.805×10⁶c+394.03 (r=0.9975), the detection limit for CPM was 1.4×10^?8 mol·L^?1. The RSD for 5 times determinations of 1.0×10^?5 mol·L^?1 CPM was 3.2%. The results of recovery test were between 96.3%–102.5%, and the RSD of recovery test (n=5) was 2.7%. In addition, eleven kinds of tertiary amines‐Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ systems were investigated in the absence and presence of SDBS. The results showed that the enhancement of SDBS on ECL intensity of tertiary amines‐Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ systems was universal.     

Pump‐Pump‐Probe Spectroscopy of a Molecular Triad Monitoring Detrimental Processes for Photoinduced Charge Accumulation

Controlling light‐induced accumulation of electrons or holes is desirable in view of multi‐electron redox chemistry, for example for the formation of solar fuels or for photoredox catalysis in general. Excitation with multiple photons is usually required for electron or hole accumulation, and consequently pump‐pump‐probe spectroscopy becomes a valuable spectroscopic tool. In this work, we excited a triarylamine‐Ru(bpy)₃²⁺‐anthraquinone triad (bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine) with two temporally delayed laser pulses of different color and monitored the resulting photoproducts. Absorption of the first photon by the Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ photosensitizer generated a triarylamine radical cation and an anthraquinone radical anion by intramolecular electron transfer. Subsequent selective excitation of either one of these two radical ion species then induced rapid reverse electron transfer to yield the triad in its initial (ground) state. This shows in direct manner that after absorption of a first photon and formation of the primary photoproducts, the absorption of a second photon can lead to unproductive electron transfer events that counteract further charge accumulation. In principle, this problem is avoidable by careful excitation wavelength selection in combination with good molecular design.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and DNA‐Binding Properties of the Chiral Ruthenium(II) Complexes Δ‐ and Λ‐[Ru(bpy)2(dmppd)]2+ (dmppd = 10,12‐Dimethylpteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13(10H,12H)‐dione; bpy = 2,2′‐Bipyridine)

Two novel chiral ruthenium(II) complexes, Δ‐[Ru(bpy)₂(dmppd)]²⁺ and Λ‐[Ru(bpy)₂(dmppd)]²⁺ (dmppd = 10,12‐dimethylpteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13(10H,12H)‐dione, bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine), were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H‐NMR and ES‐MS. The DNA‐binding behaviors of both complexes were studied by UV/VIS absorption titration, competitive binding experiments, viscosity measurements, thermal DNA denaturation, and circular‐dichroism spectra. The results indicate that both chiral complexes bind to calf‐thymus DNA in an intercalative mode, and the Δ enantiomer shows larger DNA affinity than the Λ enantiomer does. Theoretical‐calculation studies for the DNA‐binding behaviors of these complexes were carried out by the density‐functional‐theory method. The mechanism involved in the regulating and controlling of the DNA‐binding abilities of the complexes was further explored by the comparative studies of [Ru(bpy)₂(dmppd)]²⁺ and of its parent complex [Ru(bpy)₂(ppd)]²⁺ (ppd = pteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13 (10H,12H)‐dione).     

Photoreactions of tris(2,2'-bipyridyl)-ruthenium(II) with peroxydisulfate in deoxygenated aqueous solution in the presence of nucleic acid components, polynucleotides, and DNA

Abstract— The photobleaching of excited tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)-ruthenium(II), *Ru(bpy)₃²⁺, by peroxydis-ulfate in the presence of DNA and a series of polynucleotides, mononucleosides (uridine, cytidine, adenosine, guanosine), and purine or pyrimidine bases was studied in deoxygenated aqueous solution at room temperature. A reaction scheme is proposed which is confirmed by data obtained from mixing experiments with Ru(III) and bleaching measurements of Ru(II) using either continuous visible light or a nanosecond laser pulse (353 nm). The primary photobleaching step is the formation of Ru(bpy)₃²⁺ and the SO₄^- radical anion. In the presence of nucleic acids the two oxidizing species are formed in close proximity to the strand, since we used conditions where the Ru(bpy) ₃²⁺ ion is bound to the strand. Concerning the secondary reactions two clear cases (and several more complex cases) can be distinguished. On addition of uracil to the Ru(bpy)₃²⁺/S₂O₈^2- system the quantum yield for photobleaching is not significantly changed (φ^rel? 0.95), whereas it drops to virtually zero for guanosine-containing substrates, including DNA. The former result is explained by a reaction of SO₄^- with uracil leading to theN–1 radical which oxidizes Ru(II) to Ru(IIl). In contrast, the guanine moiety reacts with Ru(III) converting it into Ru(II). Therefore, in the presence of S₂O₈^2- and a substrate carrying a guanine moiety, Ru(bpy₃²⁺ acts as a photocatalyst.     

金属离子对联吡啶钌电致化学发光影响的研究

在玻碳电极上, 联吡啶钌[Ru(bpy)₃^2＋]于＋1.50 V (vs. Ag/AgCl)左右被氧化为Ru(bpy)₃^3＋, 该氧化态离子与碱性水溶液中(pH 8.2)的OH•反应生成激发态的[Ru(bpy)₃^2＋*]而发光. 研究比较了15种金属离子对Ru(bpy)₃^2＋碱性水溶液电致化学发光的影响, 并对这些影响进行了初步的解释.     

Chemiluminescence of Ru(bpy)3 2+* in the reaction of electron transfer from Ph3CNa to Ru(bpy)3 3+ in a solution

Conditions for the generation of the Ru(bpy)₃ ³⁺ complex in organic solvents (Me₃CN or MeNO₂) in the presence of small amounts of H₂SO₄ were found. Chemiluminescence was observed in the reaction of Ru(bpy)₃ ³⁺ with Ph₃Na in a THF-MeCN mixture. The chemiluminescence emitter was identified as Ru(bpy)₃ ^2+*. This emitter forms in the excited state in the elementary reaction of electron transfer from the Ph₃C⁻ anion to Ru(bpy)₃ ³⁺. Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 2, pp. 292–294, February, 1999.