(n‐Nitrophenyl)acetonitrile,with n = 2, 3 and 4

The molecular structures of the three title nitro‐substituted phenyl­aceto­nitriles, C₈H₆N₂O₂, at 123 K show that the mol­ecules are linked together very differently. In the 2‐ and 4‐nitro compounds, there are both O?H and N_cyano?H interactions, whereas the crystal lattice of the 3‐nitro compound is essentially built up by O?H interactions. The O atoms seem to prefer the aromatic H atoms, while the cyano N atoms prefer the methyl­ene H atoms. The phenyl–nitro torsion angles are ?19.83 (13), ?5.69 (12) and ?2.88 (12)°, while the phenyl–cyano­methyl torsion angles are ?62.27 (12), ?147.99 (9) and ?16.75 (14)° in the 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐NO₂‐substituted compounds, respectively.     

PM3 semiempirical study and its comparison with X-ray crystal structure of 2-methyl-4-(4-methoxyphenylazo)phenol

The crystal and molecular structure of 2-methyl-4-(4-methoxyphenylazo)phenol have been determined by X-ray single crystal diffraction technique. The compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a=9.7763(8) Å, b=11.3966(8) Å, c=11.9531(8) Å and β=108.752(6)°. In addition to the molecular geometry from X-ray experiment, its optimized molecular structure has been obtained with the aid of PM3 semiempirical quantum mechanical method, and then the corresponding geometric parameters were compared with those of X-ray crystallography. To determine conformational flexibility and crystal packing effects on the molecules, molecular energy profile of the title compound was obtained with respect to two selected degrees of torsional freedom, which were varied from ?180° to +180° in steps of 10°. Crystal structure of the title compound is a fibroid structure constructed by C–H···O and O–H···N type intermolecular hydrogen bonds. The most favorable conformer of the title compound has been determined by the crystal packing effects and there is no steric hindrance during rotation around the selected torsion angles.     

4‐Fluoro‐2‐(phospho­no­methyl)­benzene­sulfonic acid monohydrate

The title compound, C₇H₈FO₆PS·H₂O, contains both phospho­nic and sulfonic acid functionalities. An extensive network of O—H?O hydrogen bonds is present in the crystal structure. The three acidic protons are associated with the phospho­nate group. Two protons experience typical hydrogen‐bond contacts with the sulfonate‐O atoms, while the third has a longer covalent bond of 1.05 (3) Å to the phospho­nate‐O atom and a short hydrogen‐bond contact of 1.38 (3) Å to the water O atom (all O—H?O angles are in the range 162–175°). The sulfonate group is positioned so that one S—O bond is nearly coplanar with the phenyl ring [torsion angle O—S—C—C ?8.6 (2)°]. The phospho­nate group is oriented approximately perpendicular to the ring [torsion angle P—C—C—C 99.2 (2)°] with one P—O bond anti to the benzyl C—C bond. The mol­ecules pack in layers in the b–c plane with the water mol­ecules in between adjacent pairs of inverted layers.     

Methoxy[meso‐5,10,15,20‐tetrakis(2,6‐difluorophenyl)porphyrinato]­iron(III), [Fe(TDFPP)(OCH3)]

The crystal structure of the title compound, [Fe(C₄₄H₂₀F₈N₄)(CH₃O)], has been determined. The Fe atom lies 0.485 (1) Å out of the plane of the four N atoms to which it is coordinated and from the inversion centre at the origin of the unit cell. The methoxy group is axially coordinated to the Fe atom with O—Fe—N angles of 106.3 (2) and 102.4 (2)°, a C—O—Fe angle of 128.3 (5)° and an Fe—O distance of 1.788 (5) Å. Di­fluoro­phenyl rings are tilted from the porphyrin (por) plane with torsion angles of ?68.1 (6) and 77.7 (5)° across the two C_por—­C—C—C_ar systems.     

Synthesis, biological activity and crystal structure of ethyl 6-amino-8-(4-methoxy phenyl)-9-nitro-2,3,4,8-tetrahydropyrido[2,1b][1,3]thiazine-7-carboxylate

The compound ethyl 6-amino-8-(4-methoxy phenyl)-9-nitro-2,3,4,8-tetrahydropyrido[2,1b][1,3]thiazine-7-carboxylate (C₁₄H₂₂N₄O₄S₂) has been synthesized by multicomponent reactions, and characterized by ¹H NMR, IR, and X-ray diffraction. The crystal structure analysis shows that the thiazinane ring displays a half-chair conformation. The benzene ring is almost vertical to the tetrahydro-pyridine ring. Intramolecular H-bonding of N–H···O type exists and completes an S (6) ring. In the crystal, the molecules are connected into a 3D network by a N–H···O and C–H···O intermolecular hydrogen bond. The bioassay indicates that the compound shows moderate insecticidal activity against Aphis craccivora.     

Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Antidepressant Activity of 5-[4-(Benzyloxy)phenyl]-9-(n-propyl)-4,6-dioxa-1-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane Hydrochloride 0.5Hydrate

The title compound 2(C22H28N+O3)·H2O·2Cl-was synthesized by the reaction of 2-bromo-1-[4-(benzyloxy)phenyl]-1-pentone with 2,2'-azanediyldiethanol. The crystal determined by X-ray diffraction analysis belongs to the monoclinic system, space group Pc with a = 18.312(3), b = 14.838(3), c = 7.6227(14) , β = 97.981(4)°, Z = 2, Mr = 797.82, V = 2051.1(6) 3, Dc = 1.292 g/cm3, S = 0.956, μ = 0.21 mm-1, F(000) = 852, the final R = 0.0625 and wR = 0.1428 for 5683 observed reflections (Ⅰ > 2σ(Ⅰ)). Flack parameter is 0.10(9). The title compound is composed by four non-coplanar ring systems, two benzenes and two morpholines. One morpholine ring (C(3)-C(4)-N(1)-C(1)-C(2)-O(1)) forms a chair conformation, while the other (C(4)-C(3)-O(2)-C(6)-C(5)-N(1)) assumes a boat conformation. X-ray crystal structure displays extensive N-H…Cl and O-H…Cl intermolecular hydrogen bonds. The preliminary antidepressant activity test indicates that the inhibition ratio of SERT (5-HT Transporter) was 35.9% at the dosage of 10.0 mg/L.     

Synthesis and crystal structure of 2-{5-[2-(2,6-dichlorophenylamino)benzyl]-4-p-tolyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylthio}acetate

The compound 2-{5-[2-(2,6-dichlorophenylamino)benzyl]-4-p-tolyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylthio}acetate has been prepared and characterized by IR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and mass spectra. The crystal and molecular structure were further confirmed using single crystal X-ray diffraction. The crystal structure has been found to be stabilized by intermolecular C–H···O interaction generating bifurcated hydrogen bonds whereas the C–H···N interactions generate chain of molecules. The intramolecular N–H···N hydrogen bond forms a ring with S(7) graph-set motif.     

The effect of molecular planarity on crystal non‐centrosymmetry in benzyl­idene–aniline derivatives

In the title compound, N‐(2‐methoxy­phenyl)‐4‐nitro­benzyli­deneamine, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₃, the two phenyl rings make a dihedral angle of 48.0 (2)° and the nitro group is at an angle of 6.5 (1)° with respect to its attached phenyl ring. In the crystal structure, mol­ecules are related as centrosymmetric pairs through π–π interactions and are further connected through strong C—H?O hydrogen bonds [C?O 3.4259 (17) Å and C—H?O 167°], forming molecular stacks along [100]. These stacks associate further through longer C—H?O interactions, forming two‐dimensional networks. In the c direction, there are only weak van der Waals interactions. The relationship between the molecular planarity and its centrosymmetry is also briefly described.     

A benzopyran derivative substituted at position 3

In (E)‐3‐{[(di­phenoxy­phospho­ryl)­methyl­hydrazono]­methyl}‐4H‐1‐benzo­pyran‐4‐one, C₂₃H₁₉N₂O₅P, the benzo­pyran–methyl­hydrazone moiety is planar and the two phenoxy phenyl rings are inclined at angles of 21.29 (6) and 89.33 (5)°. Weak C—H?O and C—H?N intramolecular interactions exert some influence on the planarity and orientation of that moiety.     

[4‐(Tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]­aceto­nitrile

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₉H₆F₃N, at 123 K contains mol­ecules linked together via several C—H?F and C—H?N contacts, the strongest of which are 2.58 and 2.65 Å, respectively. Apparently, an F atom in the CF₃ group is able to compete with a cyano N atom for aromatic H atoms but is less prone to interact with the more acidic methyl­ene H atoms. The Ph–CH₂CN torsion angle is ?6.4 (2)° and the planar phenyl ring exhibits a typical deformation of the endo angles at the ipso‐C atoms, due to the difference in the electron‐withdrawing power of the CF₃ and CH₂CN substituents.     

Different molecular assemblies in two new phosphoric triamides with the same C(O)NHP(O)(NH)<Subscript>2</Subscript> skeleton: crystallographic study and Hirshfeld surface analysis

Different molecular assemblies were compared in two new structures [4-CH₃-C₆H₄C(O)NH]P(O)[NH]₂(CH₂)₃, 1, and [4-CH₃-C₆H₄C(O)NH]P(O)[NHC₆H₃(3,4-CH₃)₂]₂, 2, belonging to the families of “cyclic phosphoric triamide” and “phosphoric triamide”, respectively. The differences in the hydrogen bond motifs were discussed (by single crystal X-ray diffraction) as a result of three factors: (1) action of two N atoms with a non-planar environment in 1 as an H-bond acceptor, (2) different orientations of three N–H bond vectors in two molecules and (3) different conformations of C=O and P=O groups. These differences lead to more complicated hydrogen bond pattern of 1, with respect to that of 2, as structure 1 may be considered as a model of four-acceptor–three-donor versus a two-acceptor–three-donor system in 2. The main discrepancies of 1 and 2, monitored by the Hirshfeld surface analysis, are related to the contribution portions of O···H/H···O contacts, in which compound 1 not only involves the greater existence of classical hydrogen bonds but also contains the further C–H···O weak interactions in its crystal packing with respect to compound 2. Instead, in 2, the shortage of O···H/H···O contacts has been partially compensated by the C···H/H···C interactions, due to the presence of more unsaturated carbon acceptors. The differences in assemblies are also reflected in the solid-state IR spectra, especially for the N–H vibration frequencies. The new compounds were further studied by 1D NMR experiments (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P), 2D NMR techniques [HMQC and HMBC (H–C correlation), HSQC (N–H correlation)], high-resolution ESI–MS, EI–MS spectrometry and IR spectroscopy.     

Flavone‐3′‐sulfon­amide

In the title mol­ecule, C₁₅H₁₁NO₄S, the phenyl and benzene rings are quite planar, with maximum deviations from planarity of 0.009 (2) and 0.004 (1) Å, respectively. The γ‐pyrone ring deviates from planarity and makes a dihedral angle of 8.3 (3)° with the 2‐phenyl substituent. The sulfon­amide group is involved in N—H?O hydrogen bonding.     

Two trans‐4‐aminoazoxybenzenes

Two isomeric trans‐4‐amino­azoxy­benzenes, trans‐1‐(4‐amino­phenyl)‐2‐phenyl­diazene 2‐oxide (α, C₁₂H₁₁N₃O) and trans‐2‐(4‐amino­phenyl)‐1‐phenyl­diazene 2‐oxide (β, C₁₂H₁₁N₃O), have been characterized by X‐ray diffraction. The α isomer is almost planar, having torsion angles along the C_aryl—N bonds of only 4.9 (2) and 8.0 (2)°. The relatively short C_aryl—N bond to the non‐oxidized site of the azoxy group [1.401 (2) Å], together with the significant quinoid deformation of the respective phenyl ring, is evidence of conjugation between the aromatic sextet and the π‐electron system of the azoxy group. The geometry of the β isomer is different. The non‐substituted phenyl ring is twisted with respect to the NNO plane by ca 50°, whereas the substituted ring is almost coplanar with the NNO plane. The non‐oxidized N atom in the β isomer has increased sp³ character, which leads to a decrease in the N—N—C bond angle to 116.8 (2)°, in contrast with 120.9 (1)° for the α isomer. The deformation of the C—C—C angles (1–2°) in the phenyl rings at the substitution positions is evidence of the different character of the oxidized and non‐oxidized N atoms of the azoxy group. In the crystal structures, mol­ecules of both isomers are arranged in chains connected by weak N—H?O (α and β) and N—H?N (β) hydrogen bonds.     

Synthesis,X-ray Structure aSynthesis,X-ray Structure and Bioactivity of N-4-Methyl-1,2,3-thiadiazole-5-carbonyl-N′-3,5- dichloro-4-(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethoxyl)phenyl Urea

The title compound N-4-methyl-1,2,3-thiadiazole-5-carbonyl-N?-3,5-dichloro-4- (1,1,2,2- tetrafluoroethoxyl)phenyl urea (C13H8Cl2F4N4O3S, Mr = 447.19) has been synthesized from 4-methyl- 1,2,3-thiadiazole-5-carbonyl chloride as the starting material, and its structure was characterized by proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H NMR), Infra Red Spectroscopy (IR), high-resolution mass spectroscopy (HRMS), and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The crystal of the title compound belongs to triclinic, space group P with a = 6.0780(8), b = 11.3760(14), c = 12.1440(18) , α = 96.887(7), β = 91.027(12), γ = 104.252(13)°, Z = 2, V = 806.98(19) ·3, Dc = 1.840 g/cm3, μ = 0.601 mm-1, F(000) = 448, R = 0.0450 and wR = 0.0869. X-ray analysis indicates that the 1,2,3-thiadiazole ring is not coplanar with the phenyl ring, and the dihedral angle is 33.57°. Two intermolecular hydrogen bonds N(2)-H…O(1), S(1)…H-C(11), and three weak intermolecular interactions, C(11)…O(1), N(1)…O(2) and S…O(1), are observed. The bioassay results indicate that the title compound has good insecticidal activity against Culex pipiens pallens and good induction activity for tobacco against tobacco mosaic virus which is equal to that of TDL.     

1‐Methyl‐4‐nitraminopyridinium nitrate and 4‐nitraminopyridinium methanesulfonate

In the title compounds, C₆H₈N₃O₂⁺·NO₃^? and C₅­H₆­N₃­O₂⁺·­CH₃SO₃^?, respectively, the cations are almost planar; the twist of the nitr­amino group about the C—N and N—N bonds does not exceed 10°. The deviations from coplanarity are accounted for by intermolecular N—H?O interactions. The coplanarity of the NHNO₂ group and the phenyl ring leads to the deformation of the nitr­amino group. The C—N—N angle and one C—C—N angle at the junction of the phenyl ring and the nitr­amino group are increased from 120° by ca 6°, whereas the other junction C—C—N angle is decreased by ca 5°. Within the nitro group, the O—N—O angle is increased by ca 5° and one O—N—N angle is decreased by ca 5°, whereas the other O—N—N angle remains almost unchanged. The cations are connected to the anions by relatively strong N—H?O hydrogen bonds [shortest H?O separations 1.77 (2)–1.81 (3) Å] and much weaker C—H?O hydrogen bonds [H?O separations 2.30 (2)–2.63 (3) Å].     

Hydro­gen bonding and π–π stacking in di­methyl­genistein

The title compound, 5‐hydroxy‐4′,7‐di­methoxy­isoflavone, C₁₇H₁₄O₅, is composed of a benzo­pyran­one moiety, a phenyl moiety and two methoxy groups. The benzo­pyran­one ring is not coplanar with the phenyl ring, the dihedral angle between them being 56.28 (3)°. The two methoxy groups are nearly coplanar with their corresponding rings, having C—C—O—C torsion angles of 2.9 (2) and 5.9 (2)°. The mol­ecules are linked by C—H·O hydrogen bonds into sheets containing classical centrosymmetric (8) rings. The sheets are further linked by aromatic π–π stacking interactions and C—H·O hydrogen bonds into a supramolecular structure.     

5‐Ethyl‐2′‐deoxy‐4′‐thiouridine (R)‐S‐oxide monohydrate

The pyrimidine ring of the title compound, C₁₁H₁₆N₂O₅S·H₂O, is planar to within 0.026 (1) Å and makes an angle of 77.73 (8)° with the mean plane of the thiosugar ring. In terms of standard nucleoside nomenclature, this ring has a C1′‐exo,C2′‐endo conformation. The O5′—C5′—C4′—C3′ torsion angle is ?167.4 (2)° and the glycosidic S4′—C1′—N1—C2 torsion angle is ?101.8 (2)° (anti).     

5‐Methyl‐2′‐deoxy‐4′‐thio‐α‐uridine (R)‐­S‐oxide

The pyrimidine ring of the title compound, C₁₀H₁₄N₂O₅S, is planar to within 0.024 (1) Å and makes an angle of 75.46 (10)° with the mean plane of the thio­sugar ring. In terms of standard nucleoside nomenclature, this ring has the C3′‐endo conformation. The O5′—C5′—C4′—C3′ torsion angle is 166.5 (3)° and the glycosidic torsion angle S4′—C1′—N1—C2 is ?52.1 (2)° (syn).     

Ethyl 2‐{[2‐(3‐nitro­phenyl)‐5‐phenyl‐1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl]­sulfanyl}acetate: synthesis via a microwave‐mediated combinatorial chemistry approach

The orange title compound, C₁₉H₁₇N₃O₄S, can be synthesized either via microwave‐mediated combinatorial chemistry strategies or conventional synthetic procedures. The phenyl and meta‐nitro­phenyl C₆ rings are essentially coplanar with the central imidazolyl ring, with interplanar angles of 0.87 (5) and 0.97 (4)°, respectively, resulting in optimum conjugation (SCH₂ moiety included); λ_max = 281 nm in CH₃CN. The principal intermolecular interactions are N_imid—H?O_nitro and N_imid—H?O=C [N?O = 3.058 (2) and 3.432 (3) Å, and N—H?O = 128 and 153°, respectively]. The closest H?S distance is an intramolecular C—H?S contact, with H?S = 2.54 Å and C—H?S = 136°.     

Tris(5-bromo-2-methoxyphenyl)bismuth dicarboxylates [(C<Subscript>6</Subscript>H<Subscript>3</Subscript>(Br-5)(MeO-2)]<Subscript>3</Subscript>Bi[OC(O)CHal<Subscript>3</Subscript>]<Subscript>2</Subscript> (Hal = F,Cl): synthesis and structure

Tris(5-bromo-2-methoxyphenyl)bismuth dicarboxylates [(C₆H₃(Br-5)(MeO-2)]₃Bi[OC(O)CHal₃]₂, Hal = F (II) and Cl (III), have been synthesized by the reaction between tris(5-bromo-2-methoxyphenyl)bismuth (I) and trifluoroacetic acid and thrichloroacetic acid, respectively, in the presence of hydrogen peroxide in ether. According to X-ray diffraction data, a crystal of complex I contains two types of crystallographically independent molecules (a and b) both with a trigonal pyramid configuration. The bismuth atoms in complexes II and III have a distorted trigonal bipyramidal coordination with carboxylate substituents in axial positions. Axial OBiO angles are 166.3(3)° (II) and 171.6(2)° (III); equatorial CBiC angles are 118.0(3)°–123.1(3)° (II) and 113.6(3)°–127.4(3)° (III). Bi–C bond lengths are 2.189(7)–2.200(8) Å (II) and 2.190(8)–2.219(7) Å (III), and Bi–О distances are 2.280(6), 2.459(16) Å (II) and 2.264(5), 2.266(5) Å (III). Intramolecular contacts between the central atom and the oxygen atoms of carbonyl groups (Bi···O 3.028(9), 3.162(9) Å (II); 3.117(9), 3.202(9) Å (III)) are observed at maximum equatorial angles. The oxygen atoms of methoxy groups are coordinated to the bismuth atom. The Bi···O distances in complexes II and III (3.028(16), 3.157(16), 3.162(16) and 3.17(16), 3.143(16), 3.202(16) Å, respectively) are slightly longer than in complex I (3.007(9)–3.136(4) Å).