首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 375 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
We examine observational constraints on the generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG) model for dark energy from the 9 Hubble parameter data points, the 115 SNLS Sne Ia data and the size of baryonic acoustic oscillation peak at redshift, z=0.35z=0.35. At a 95.4% confidence level, a combination of three data sets gives 0.67?As?0.830.67?As?0.83 and −0.21?α?0.420.21?α?0.42, which is within the allowed parameters ranges of the GCG as a candidate of the unified dark matter and dark energy. It is found that the standard Chaplygin gas model (α=1α=1) is ruled out by these data at the 99.7% confidence level.  相似文献   

11.
12.
13.
14.
We employ chaotic (?2?2 and ?4?4) inflation to illustrate the important role radiative corrections can play during the inflationary phase. Yukawa interactions of ?  , in particular, lead to corrections of the form −κ?4ln(?/μ)κ?4ln(?/μ), where κ>0κ>0 and μ   is a renormalization scale. For instance, ?4?4 chaotic inflation with radiative corrections looks compatible with the most recent WMAP (5 year) analysis, in sharp contrast to the tree level case. We obtain the 95% confidence limits 2.4×10−14?κ?5.7×10−142.4×10−14?κ?5.7×10−14, 0.931?ns?0.9580.931?ns?0.958 and 0.038?r?0.2050.038?r?0.205, where nsns and r   respectively denote the scalar spectral index and scalar to tensor ratio. The limits for ?2?2 inflation are κ?7.7×10−15κ?7.7×10−15, 0.929?ns?0.9660.929?ns?0.966 and 0.023?r?0.1350.023?r?0.135. The next round of precision experiments should provide a more stringent test of realistic chaotic ?2?2 and ?4?4 inflation.  相似文献   

15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号