On the process of gaining language as a resource in mathematics education

In this paper, we expand our prior work on mathematics education in contexts of language diversity by elaborating on the three perspectives on language described by Ruiz (NABE J 8(2):15–34, 1984): language-as-right, language-as-resource, and language-as-problem. We illustrate our arguments with data taken from research contexts in Catalonia-Spain and South Africa. In these two parts of the world, the language policy in education has long been an issue, with a monolingual orientation that values one language (i.e., Catalan in Catalonia and English in South Africa) over others. Throughout the introduction of specific examples of policy documents, classroom practices, and participants’ reports, our main point is that the right of using the students’ languages makes sense because it is itself more than an intrinsic human right; it is an option that potentially benefits the creation of mathematics learning opportunities. Especially for the instances of classroom practices, our examples can be considered as representative in that they point to a common situation in our data: despite the fact of the language of learning and teaching being fixed, there is room for the learners and the teacher to take or react to a decision on what language to use, with whom, and how in concrete moments of the interaction. However, on the basis of our studies and drawing on the literature in mathematics education and language diversity, we argue that language rights are not sufficiently connected to language as a pedagogical resource. The enactment of these rights is still contributing in many ways to the social and political construction of problems concerning the role of certain languages in classroom interaction. We conclude the paper by discussing some possibilities for framing language as a resource that provide effective support to all students’ learning of mathematics.     

Language and communication in mathematics education: an overview of research in the field

Within the field of mathematics education, the central role language plays in the learning, teaching, and doing of mathematics is increasingly recognised, but there is not agreement about what this role (or these roles) might be or even about what the term ‘language’ itself encompasses. In this issue of ZDM, we have compiled a collection of scholarship on language in mathematics education research, representing a range of approaches to the topic. In this survey paper, we outline a categorisation of ways of conceiving of language and its relevance to mathematics education, the theoretical resources drawn upon to systematise these conceptions, and the methodological approaches employed by researchers. We identify four broad areas of concern in mathematics education that are addressed by language-oriented research: analysis of the development of students’ mathematical knowledge; understanding the shaping of mathematical activity; understanding processes of teaching and learning in relation to other social interactions; and multilingual contexts. A further area of concern that has not yet received substantial attention within mathematics education research is the development of the linguistic competencies and knowledge required for participation in mathematical practices. We also discuss methodological issues raised by the dominance of English within the international research community and suggest some implications for researchers, editors and publishers.     

To what extent are students expected to participate in specialised mathematical discourse? Change over time in school mathematics in England

ABSTRACT

From a discursive perspective, differences in the language in which mathematics questions are posed change the nature of the mathematics with which students are expected to engage. The project The Evolution of the Discourse of School Mathematics (EDSM) analysed the discourse of mathematics examination papers set in the UK between 1980 and 2011. In this article we address the issue of how students over this period have been expected to engage with the specialised discourse of school mathematics. We explain our analytic methods and present some outcomes of the analysis. We identify changes in engagement with algebraic manipulation, proving, relating mathematics to non-mathematical contexts and making connections between specialised mathematical objects. These changes are discussed in the light of public and policy domain debates about ‘standards’ of examinations.     

“Everything is Math in the Whole World”: Integrating Critical and Community Knowledge in Authentic Mathematical Investigations with Elementary Latina/o Students

This critical ethnographic study of an after-school mathematics club for elementary-aged Latina/o youth focuses on connecting critical, community, and mathematical knowledge in the context of authentic, community-based investigations. We present cases of two extended projects to highlight tensions and dilemmas that emerged, particularly tensions related to ensuring rich mathematics in the contexts of projects that were personally and socially meaningful to the students. Our analysis offers insights into critical mathematics education with elementary aged students, and has the potential to counter dominant deficit perspectives of Latina/o youth. Additionally, the findings of this study inform critical approaches to teaching mathematics in schools attended by marginalized students in order to reverse prevalent trends of our educational system failing these students.     

Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: the productive notion of mathematics laboratories

In our research work, we have looked at the way in which artefacts become, for teachers as well as for students, instruments of their mathematical activity. The issues related to the use of tools and technologies in mathematical education are now widely considered. A look to history highlights the different ways in which the same questions have been studied at different times and in different places. This suggests that the contribution of artefacts to mathematics learning should be considered in terms of various contexts. Our “visits” to these contexts will be guided by the coordination of two main theoretical frameworks, the instrumental approach and the semiotic mediation approach from the perspective of mathematics laboratory. This journey through history and schooling represents a good occasion to address some questions: Are there “good” contexts in which to develop mathematical instruments? Are there “good” teaching practices which assist students’ instrumental geneses and construct mathematical meanings? How is it possible to promote such teaching practices? Some study cases are discussed.     

A study of early career teachers’ practices related to language and language diversity during mathematics instruction

The role of language in mathematics teaching and learning is increasingly highlighted by standards and reform movements in the US. However, little is known about teachers’, and especially early career teachers’ (ECTs) practices and understandings related to language in mathematics instruction. This multiple case study explored the language-related understandings and practices of six ECTs in diverse elementary classrooms. Using iterative cycles of analysis, we found that all ECTs regularly attended to students’ mathematical vocabulary use and development. Yet, there was variability in ECTs’ focus on how to teach mathematical vocabulary, expectations for students’ precise use of mathematical terminology, and the use of multiple languages during instruction. These findings indicate that ECTs need more targeted support during teacher preparation and early career teaching in order to better support all students’ language development in the mathematics classroom.     

Students’ multilingual repertoires-in-use for meaning-making: Contrasting case studies in three multilingual constellations

Mathematics education for multilingual classrooms calls for instructional approaches that build upon students’ multilingual resources. However, so far, students’ multilingual resources and the interplay of their components have only partly been disentangled and rarely compared between different multilingual contexts. This article suggests a conceptualization of multilingual repertoires-in-use as characterized by (a) what students use of certain languages, registers, and representations as sources for meaning-making in mathematics classrooms and (b) their processes of how they connect certain languages, registers, and representations. This qualitative learning-process study compares students’ multilingual repertoires-in-use in three contexts: Spanish-speaking foreign language learners of German in Colombia, Turkish- and German-speaking students born in Germany, and Arabic-speaking German language beginners recently immigrated to Germany. The analysis reveals the biggest differences not only in what the students use, but how they connect languages, registers, and representations. Some of these differences can partly be traced back to different classroom cultural practices. These findings suggest extending the conceptual framework for multilingual repertoires-in-use and including it in a social theoretical perspective. Thus, these findings have important practical consequences for multilingual mathematics classrooms: The instructional approach of relating languages, registers, and representations needs to be applied more flexibly, taking into account students’ different starting points. When doing so, students’ connection processes should be supported and explicated more systematically in order to fully exploit the students’ repertoires.     

A new generation of mathematics textbook research and development

This paper adopts a multimodal approach to the latest generation of digital mathematics textbooks (print and online) to investigate how the design, content, and features facilitate the construction of mathematical knowledge for teaching and learning purposes. The sequential organization of the print version is compared to the interactive format of the online version which foregrounds explanations and important mathematical content while simultaneously ensuring a high level of connectivity and coherence across hierarchical layers of mathematical knowledge. For example, mathematical content in the online version is linked to definitions, theorems, examples and exercises that can be viewed in the original context in which the material was presented, and the content can also be linked to mathematics software. Significantly, the development process for the new generation of mathematics textbooks involves using a ‘design neutral’ markup language so that the books are simultaneously published as both print books and online books. In this development process, the structure of the chapters, sections, and subsections with their various elements are explicitly marked-up in the master document and preserved in the output format, giving rise to new methodologies for large-scale analysis of mathematics textbooks and student use of these books. For example, tracking methodologies and interactive visualizations of student viewings of online mathematical textbooks are identified as new research directions for investigating how students engage with mathematics textbooks within and across different educational contexts.     

How young students communicate their mathematical problem solving in writing

This study investigates young students’ writing in connection to mathematical problem solving. Students’ written communication has traditionally been used by mathematics teachers in the assessment of students’ mathematical knowledge. This study rests on the notion that this writing represents a particular activity which requires a complex set of resources. In order to help students develop their writing, teachers need to have a thorough knowledge of mathematical writing and its distinctive features. The study aims to add to the body of knowledge about writing in school mathematics by investigating young students’ mathematical writing from a communicational, rather than mathematical, perspective. A basic inventory of the communicational choices, that are identifiable across a sample of 519 mathematical texts, produced by 9–12 year old students, is created. The texts have been analysed with multimodal discourse analysis, and the findings suggest diversity in students’ use of images, words, numerals, symbols and layout to organize their texts and to represent their problem-solving process along with an answer to the problem. The inventory and the indication that students have different ideas on how, what, for whom and why they should be writing, can be used by teachers to initiate discussions of what may constitute good communication.     

Moving toward shared realities through empathy in mathematical modeling: An ecological systems theory approach

The mathematics education community has routinely called for mathematics tasks to be connected to the real world. However, accomplishing this in ways that are relevant to students’ lived experiences can be challenging. Meanwhile, mathematical modeling has gained traction as a way for students to learn mathematics through real-world connections. In an open problem to the mathematics education community, this paper explores connections between the mathematical modeling and the nature of what is considered relevant to students. The role of empathy is discussed as a proposed component for consideration within mathematical modeling so that students can further relate to real-world contexts as examined through the lens of Ecological Systems Theory. This is contextualized through a classroom-tested example entitled “Tiny Homes as a Solution to Homelessness” followed by implications and conclusions as they relate to mathematics education.     

Exploiting the potential of primary historical sources in primary school: a focus on teacher’s actions

Integrating history of mathematics in classes could be a hard task with young pupils. Indeed, original historical sources have a language that is far from the modern one. Such texts represent cultural artefacts that can give access to mathematical knowledge. The teacher can exploit such potential acting as a mediator between the mathematical signs of the source and those signs that are accessible to students. Through a case study, we investigate the role of the teacher in the process of semiotic mediation during a collective discussion. The analysed intervention is made of two phases: firstly, students work collaboratively and secondly, the teacher mediates a discussion aimed at institutionalizing the knowledge. During the discussion, working on a text from Tartaglia’s translation of Euclid’s Elements, a group of fifth graders constructs a definition of prime numbers. Referring to the Theory of Semiotic Mediation, we analyse the role of the teacher in building up semiotic chains linking students’ productions to an institutionalized knowledge emerging from the collective discussion. We highlight how teacher’s focalization on students’ words allows the progress of the discussion: the potential of the historical text is exploited fostering a definition that is close to culturally shared mathematics.     

Mathematics education: Procedures, rituals and man's search for meaning

An attempt is made to analyze mathematical behavior from more general psychological perspectives. The mathematical language is a special case of the human language, which is a form of expression. Many people use common language in a meaningless way. The same is true about the mathematical language. Rituals are other forms of expression. Many people identify rituals in many mathematical contexts (procedures, argumentation). Thus, quite often, they behave in a meaningless way as required by many rituals. On the other hand, the community of mathematics education struggles for meaningful learning. This can be regarded as a special case of man's search for meaning. The general claims will be illustrated by some examples from various mathematical contexts.     

Conceptions of Turkish mathematics teachers about the effectiveness of classroom teaching

This study investigated how Turkish mathematics teachers evaluate the effectiveness of classroom teaching in terms of improving students’ mathematical proficiency. To this purpose, teachers were asked to evaluate a mathematics lesson as presented them in a vignette. By means of cluster analysis, the participants’ evaluations of the lesson were described in five thematic dimensions, which could be further assembled into two overriding categories: students’ understanding of the subject, and teachers’ classroom practices. The overall aim of the current paper is to propose a preliminary model of the framework that Turkish mathematics teachers use to evaluate a mathematics lesson.     

The stability of learners’ choices for real-life situations to be used in mathematics

One of the efforts to improve and enhance the performance and achievement in mathematics of learners is the incorporation of life-related contexts in mathematics teaching and assessments. These contexts are normally, with good reasons, decided upon by curriculum makers, textbook authors, teachers and constructors of examinations and tests. However, little or no consideration is given to whether students prefer and find these real-life situations interesting. There is also a dearth of studies dealing explicitly with the real-life situations learners prefer to deal with in mathematics. This issue was investigated and data on students’ choices for contextual issues to be used in mathematics were collected at two time periods. The results indicate that learners’ preferences for contextual situations to be used in mathematics remained fairly stable. It is concluded that real-life issues that learners highly prefer are not normally included in the school mathematics curriculum and that there is a need for a multidisciplinary approach to develop mathematical activities which take into account the expressed preferences of learners.     

Students' Critical Awareness of Voice and Agency in Mathematics Classroom Discourse

This account of my extended conversation with a high school mathematics class focuses on voice and agency. As an investigation of possibilities opened up by introducing mathematics students to what Fairclough (1992) called “critical language awareness” (p. 2), I prompted the students daily to become ever more aware of their language practices in class. The tensions in this conversation proved parallel to the tension in mathematics between individual initiative and convention, a tension that Pickering (1995) called the “dance of agency” (p. 21). Participant students in this classroom-based research resisted the idea of linguistic reference to human agency, although their actual language practice revealed some recognition of human agency.     

The ability of students and teachers to use counter-examples to justify mathematical propositions: a pilot study in South Korea and Hong Kong

Counter-examples, which are a distinct kind of example, have a functional role in inducing logically deductive reasoning skills in the learning process. In this investigation, we compare the ability of students and prospective teachers in South Korea and Hong Kong to use counter-examples to justify mathematical propositions. The results highlight that South Korean students performed better than Hong Kong students at justifying propositions using counter-examples in algebra problems, but both did equally well in geometry problems. In terms of the prospective teachers’ ability to justify propositions using counter-examples in two particular topics, properties of the absolute value function and parallelogram, Hong Kong prospective teachers performed relatively weakly in the absolute value problem but better in the parallelogram problem compared with South Korean prospective teachers. The weaknesses and strengths of students and prospective teachers in generating counter-examples associated with logical reasoning in mathematical contexts in the two regions indicate ways of improving the effectiveness of learning and teaching mathematics through the use of counter-examples.     

Prospective mathematics teachers’ use of linguistic signifiers in the context of angles formed by two lines cut by a transversal

Embracing a multisemiotic approach, this case study addresses the ways in which prospective middle school mathematics teachers use linguistic signifiers idiosyncratic to the Turkish language to construe mathematical meaning of angles formed by two lines cut by a transversal. Also, students’ mathematical referents to explain angle relationships were characterized. Six students (3 female, 3 male) volunteered to participate in an individual task-based interview. The results indicated that students used morphological units of meaning when they explained the mathematical concepts. Also, most students used the parallelism of the two lines cut by a transversal as a qualifier to be able to talk about the angle pairs on a transversal. They most often recited properties, such as the U property, to explain the angle relationships. Implications for future research are provided.     

Teaching teachers mathematics through programming

There are two main arguments underlying the claims for the value of interactive computer programming used by students to model mathematical ideas. One is concerned with mathematical content, i.e. with mathematics as an object of study. The other is concerned with mathematical activity, i.e. doing mathematics, or ‘Mathematicking’ [1]. Both content and activity include processes and these provide the main links with programming. Examples of processes in the content of mathematics are addition, transformation and integration, and these can be described by instructions in a computer program. Examples of process in the activity are problem‐solving, proof generation and pattern finding which can be described by analogy to program building and debugging. We assess the arguments for programming, in relation to the training of teachers, and describe a pilot‐study in which student teachers with mathematical difficulties were taught the programming language LOGO. Observation of the students, learning the language and using it to manipulate computer models of mathematical ideas, which they had not understood previously, highlights both advantages and disadvantages in this approach. The problem of the representation of mathematical ideas within programming projects is discussed.     

Semantic contamination and mathematical proof: Can a non-proof prove?

The way words are used in natural language can influence how the same words are understood by students in formal educational contexts. Here we argue that this so-called semantic contamination effect plays a role in determining how students engage with mathematical proof, a fundamental aspect of learning mathematics. Analyses of responses to argument evaluation tasks suggest that students may hold two different and contradictory conceptions of proof: one related to conviction, and one to validity. We demonstrate that these two conceptions can be preferentially elicited by making apparently irrelevant linguistic changes to task instructions. After analyzing the occurrence of “proof” and “prove” in natural language, we report two experiments that suggest that the noun form privileges evaluations related to validity, and that the verb form privileges evaluations related to conviction. In short, we show that (what is judged to be) a non-proof can sometimes (be judged to) prove.     

Soap films and GeoGebra in the study of Fermat and Steiner points

We discuss how mathematics and secondary mathematics education majors developed an understanding of Fermat points for the triangle as well as Steiner points for the square and regular pentagon, and also of soap film configurations between parallel plates where forces are in equilibrium. The activities included the use of soap films and the interactive geometry program GeoGebra. Students worked in small groups using these tools to investigate the properties of Fermat and Steiner points and then justified the results of their investigations using geometrical arguments. These activities are specific approaches of how to encourage prospective teachers to use physical experiments to support students’ development of mathematical curiosity and mathematical justifications.